2017-07-27 09:40:00 | PLAN |
| REVIEW COMMENTS |
| |
| 1ST REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) |
| ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| (561) 805-6714 |
| [email protected] |
| |
| DENIED BY BUILDING |
| PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| |
| 1) THIS SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING HAS A VALUE OF MORE THAN |
| $300,000.00. SHOW HOW YOU WILL COMPLY WITH FBC EXISTING |
| BUILDING SECTION 708.8. WHEN A ROOF COVERING ON AN |
| EXISTING SITE-BUILT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE |
| IS REMOVED AND REPLACED ON A BUILDING THAT IS LOCATED |
| IN THE WIND-BORNE DEBRIS REGION AS DEFINED IN THE |
| FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING AND THAT HAS AN INSURED |
| VALUE OF $300,000 OR MORE OR, IF THE BUILDING IS |
| UNINSURED OR FOR WHICH DOCUMENTATION OF INSURED VALUE |
| IS NOT PRESENTED, HAS A JUST VALUATION FOR THE |
| STRUCTURE FOR PURPOSES OF AD VALOREM TAXATION OF |
| $300,000 OR MORE: |
| |
| (A) ROOF TO WALL CONNECTIONS SHALL BE IMPROVED AS |
| REQUIRED BY SECTION 708.8.1. |
| |
| (B) MANDATED RETROFITS OF THE ROOF-TO-WALL CONNECTION |
| SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED BEYOND A 15-PERCENT INCREASE IN |
| THE COST OF REROOFING. |
| |
| EXCEPTION: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES |
| PERMITTED SUBJECT TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ARE NOT |
| REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THIS SECTION. |
| |
| 708.8.1 ROOF-TO-WALL CONNECTIONS FOR SITE-BUILT |
| SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES. |
| WHERE REQUIRED BY SECTION 708.8, THE INTERSECTION OF |
| ROOF FRAMING WITH THE WALL BELOW SHALL PROVIDE |
| SUFFICIENT RESISTANCE TO MEET THE UPLIFT LOADS |
| SPECIFIED IN TABLE 708.8.1, EITHER BECAUSE OF EXISTING |
| CONDITIONS OR THROUGH RETROFIT MEASURES. AS AN |
| ALTERNATIVE TO AN ENGINEERED DESIGN, THE PRESCRIPTIVE |
| RETROFIT SOLUTIONS PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 708.8.1.1 |
| THROUGH 708.8.1.7 SHALL BE ACCEPTED AS MEETING THE |
| MANDATED ROOF-TO-WALL RETROFIT REQUIREMENTS. |
| |
| EXCEPTIONS: |
| |
| 1. WHERE IT CAN BE DEMONSTRATED (BY CODE ADOPTION DATE |
| DOCUMENTATION AND PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) THAT |
| ROOF-TO-WALL CONNECTIONS AND/OR ROOF-TO-FOUNDATION |
| CONTINUOUS LOAD PATH REQUIREMENTS WERE REQUIRED AT THE |
| TIME OF ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION. |
| |
| 2. ROOF-TO-WALL CONNECTIONS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED |
| UNLESS EVALUATION AND INSTALLATION OF CONNECTIONS AT |
| GABLE ENDS OR ALL CORNERS CAN BE COMPLETED FOR 15 |
| PERCENT OF THE COST OF ROOF REPLACEMENT. |
| |
| |
| |