|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 17031171
Plan Review Stops For Permit 17031171 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2017-05-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2017-05-19 |
Time |
14:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2017-05-19 |
Time |
14:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-04-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2017-04-06 |
Time |
11:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2017-04-06 |
Time |
11:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2017-04-06 11:31:40 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | 561-805-6724 | | | | 1. FBC 107, THE SUBMITTAL INCLUDES PLAN PAGES PRINTED | | 11X17 WHICH APPEAR TO BE REDUCED. THE PLANS WERE | | PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER, BUT THE PLANS ARE NOT SIGNED | | AND SEALED. FLOOR PLAN NOTES ARE TOO SMALL TO BE READ | | EASILY. PLANS NEED TO BE FULL SIZE FOR REVIEW, RECORDS | | RETENTION (SCANNING), AND INSPECTIONS. | | | | FBC 107, FS 471, PROVIDE FULL SIZE LEGIBLE SIGNED & | | SEALED PLANS FOR REVIEW. | | | | IN THE FUTURE, PLEASE CONSIDER DIGITAL SUBMITTAL. IF | | APPLICANT RESUBMITS THIS DIGITALLY, ONE COMPLETE | | PACKAGE FOR REVIEW NEEDS TO BE UPLOADED. IT IS NOT | | NECESSARY TO UPLOAD PREVIOUSLY DENIED DOCUMENTS. | | | | TO SUBMIT DIGITALLY, CONTACT | | | | [email protected] | | [email protected] | | | | PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU WISH TO DISCUSS | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2017-03-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2017-03-31 |
Time |
11:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2017-03-31 |
Time |
11:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2017-03-31 12:38:15 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | 561-805-6724 | | | | 1. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHERE THE PRODUCTS ARE PROPOSED. THE | | PRODUCT APPROVALS INCLUDE MORE THAN ONE INSTALLATION | | OPTION OR PRODUCT. | | | | PROVIDE A SCHEDULE, OR MARK UP THE ELEVATIONS, TO SHOW | | LOCATIONS OF PRODUCTS PROPOSED. UNLESS A SHEDULE IS | | PROVIDED BY SEOR, WORST CASE WILL BE USED FOR ALL | | PRODUCTS (APPEARS TO BE +81/-117 ASD, +135/-195 LFRD) | | SEE SHEETS S002, S003). | | | | FOR INSTANCE, SEE NOA 15-0430.04 PAGES 3-6, FOUR | | DIFFERENT WIND DESIGN LOAD CHARTS, WHICH OPTION(S) DO | | YOU PROPOSE? THE DPS RANGE FROM +67.9 TO 85, -67.9 TO | | -145 (BASED ON GLASS TYPE, ANCHORING METHOD, SIZE). | | | | ON THE PRODUCT APPROVALS, INDICATE WHICH OPTION IS | | PROPOSED. | | | | 2. SHOP DRAWING REVIEW STAMP DOES NOT INDICATE WHICH | | PRODUCTS WERE REVIEWED, FBC 107, CLARIFY. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2017-05-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2017-05-19 |
Time |
14:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2017-05-16 |
Time |
14:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2017-04-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2017-04-06 |
Time |
11:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2017-04-03 |
Time |
14:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2017-04-04 14:57:19 | RESUB ROUTED TO SHILL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2017-03-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2017-03-31 |
Time |
12:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2017-03-29 |
Time |
10:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2017-03-30 10:07:32 | SUBMITTAL ROUTED TO SHILL |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2017-05-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2017-05-19 |
Time |
14:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2017-05-19 |
Time |
14:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
 |