| 2016-11-01 09:43:11 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) THE PROPOSED PROJECT INDICATES MULTIPLE NEW FIRE |
| | ALARM DEVICES THAT WERE NOT EXISTING REPLACEMENTS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE REVISED VOLTAGE DROP AND BATTERY |
| | CALCULATIONS TO INCLUDE ALL NEW DEVICES. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) THERE WERE NO PRODUCTS SPECS OR SHEETS PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE ALL APPLICABLE PRODUCTS SHEETS FOR ALL |
| | NEW DEVICES. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) THE NEW DEVICES ARE NOT SHOWN ON SYSTEM DIAGRAM. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A SYSTEM DIAGRAM INCLUDING ADDRESSABLE |
| | LABELS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) THERE WERE NO WIRING DIAGRAMS PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE NEW WIRING DIAGRAMS FOR ALL NEW DEVICES |
| | AND/OR ANY NEW WIRING INSTALLATIONS. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 5) THERE IS NO INDICATIONS THAT THE EXISTING FIRE ALARM |
| | WILL REMAIN FULLY FUNCTIONAL DURING CONSTRUCTION |
| | PERIOD. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA NFPA 101, CHAPTER 9, BUILDING SERVICE AND FIRE |
| | PROTECTION EQUIPMENT |
| | |
| | 9.6.1.6* WHERE A REQUIRED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS OUT OF |
| | SERVICE FOR MORE THAN 4 HOURS IN A 24-HOUR PERIOD, THE |
| | AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION SHALL BE NOTIFIED, AND |
| | THE BUILDING SHALL BE EVACUATED, OR AN APPROVED FIRE |
| | WATCH SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL PARTIES LEFT |
| | UNPROTECTED BY THE SHUTDOWN UNTIL THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM |
| | HAS BEEN RETURNED TO SERVICE. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE OF COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 6) A NFPA 72 INSPECTION AND FULL FIRE ALARM TEST SHALL |
| | BE REQUIRED FOR THIS PROPOSED INSTALLATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 7) PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET REVISION CLOUDS OR |
| | NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | 8) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
