|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 16051111
Plan Review Stops For Permit 16051111 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-06-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-06-23 |
Time |
11:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-06-23 |
Time |
11:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-06-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-06-01 |
Time |
12:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-06-01 |
Time |
12:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-06-01 12:20:44 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | 561-805-6724 | | | | FROM PREVIOUS LIST (INCLUDED ONLY THE PORTION | | APPLICABLE TO THIS SUBMITTAL): | | | | 1. EVIDENCE OF DELEGATED ENGINEERING REVIEW IS TO BE | | ACCOMPLISHED IN THE FOLLOWING WAYS (FBC 107): | | | | B. A REVIEW LETTER, SIGNED AND SEALED IN ACCORDANCE | | WITH FAC61G15-23.002/FS471. THE LETTER IS TO BE VERY | | SPECIFIC - ENGINEER NAME AND FIRM, DRAWINGS REVIEWED | | (SHEET NUMBERS, DATES, NAME OF DRAWINGS). THE LETTER | | SUBMITTED HAS A DIGITALLY CREATED SIGNATURE, REFERS TO | | DRAWINGS PREPARED BY CECO, BUT CECO DELEGATED TO | | ANOTHER ENGINEER AND FIRM OR, | | | | 2ND REVIEW, LETTER IS SIGNED AND SEALED BUT NOT | | REVISED. THIS DELEGATED ENGINEERING REVIEW LETTER WAS | | REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AND HE DETERMINED | | THAT THE LETTER IN ITS CURRENT STATE DID NOT REFER | | SPECIFICALLY ENOUGH TO THE DELEGATED ENGINEERING. | | | | THE LETTER DOES NOT REFER TO ANY SHEET NUMBERS OR DATES | | | | THE LETTER REFERS TO ENGINEER'S DRAWINGS AND | | CALCULATIONS "PREPARED BY SUNCOAST POST-TENSION." IT | | DOES NOT APPEAR THAT SUNCOAST POST-TENSION DID NOT | | PREPARE THE DRAWINGS. BASED ON THE SEAL AND TITLE | | BLOCK, THE ENGINEERING WAS PREPARED BY RAFAEL E. | | PUERTA, PE, OF DPS INC. | | | | 2. FOR DELEGATED ENGINEERING REVIEW PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED | | WITH A DIGITAL IMAGE OF A SIGNATURE, PLEASE PROVIDE | | SIGNED AND SEALED ORIGINALS TO PROPERLY DOCUMENT THE | | FILE. | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-05-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-05-26 |
Time |
14:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-05-26 |
Time |
13:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-05-26 14:15:20 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | 561-805-6724 | | | | 1. EVIDENCE OF DELEGATED ENGINEERING REVIEW IS TO BE | | ACCOMPLISHED IN THE FOLLOWING WAYS (FBC 107): | | | | A. A SHOP DRAWING REVIEW STAMP DIRECTLY ON THE | | DELEGATED ENGINEERING BY THE EOR (OR BY ANOTHER | | LICENSED ENGINEER IN THE EOR'S OFFICE, PLEASE INCLUDE | | NAME & LICENSE NUMBER). THE SIGNATURE/INITIALS SHOULD | | BE IN INK, OR | | | | B. A REVIEW LETTER, SIGNED AND SEALED IN ACCORDANCE | | WITH FAC61G15-23.002/FS471. THE LETTER IS TO BE VERY | | SPECIFIC - ENGINEER NAME AND FIRM, DRAWINGS REVIEWED | | (SHEET NUMBERS, DATES, NAME OF DRAWINGS). THE LETTER | | SUBMITTED HAS A DIGITALLY CREATED SIGNATURE, REFERS TO | | DRAWINGS PREPARED BY CECO, BUT CECO DELEGATED TO | | ANOTHER ENGINEER AND FIRM OR, | | | | C. THE DELEGATED ENGINEERING COULD BE SUBMITTED | | DIGITALLY. IF THIS ENGINEER (RAFAEL E. PUERTA, PE OF | | DPS INC) DOES NOT HAVE A DIGITAL SIGNATURE, THE PAPER | | ORIGINAL CAN BE PROVIDED AT THE BUILDING DIVISION AS A | | "SIGNATURE DOCUMENT." THE ENGINEER CAN SIGN AND SEAL | | HIS REVIEW LETTER DIGITALLY. | | | | 2. FOR DELEGATED ENGINEERING REVIEW PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED | | WITH A DIGITAL IMAGE OF A SIGNATURE, PLEASE PROVIDE | | SIGNED AND SEALED ORIGINALS TO PROPERLY DOCUMENT THE | | FILE. | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-06-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-06-23 |
Time |
11:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-06-10 |
Time |
11:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-06-10 11:22:05 | RESUB ROUTED TO SHILL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-06-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-06-01 |
Time |
12:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-06-01 |
Time |
10:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-06-01 10:24:07 | RESUB ROUTED TO SHILL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-05-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-05-27 |
Time |
08:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-05-25 |
Time |
10:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-05-26 10:34:52 | SUBMITTAL ROUTED TO SHILL |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
 |