 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 16050249
Plan Review Stops For Permit 16050249 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-09-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-19 |
Time |
11:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-19 |
Time |
11:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-09-19 12:20:15 | PROVISOS: | | | | COMPONENT AND CLADDING PRODUCT APPROVALS REVIEWED BY | | DESIGNER OF RECORD ARE TO BE SUBMTTED AS A REVISION | | PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. | | | | ROOF PERMIT REQUIRED. PRODUCT APPROVALS REVIEWED BY | | DESIGNER OF RECORD ARE TO BE SUBMITTED AS A REVISION | | PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR TO INDICATE ASSEMBLY | | OR INSTALLATION METHOD PROPOSED. INCLUDE ENGINEERING IF | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | VERIFIED PLANS ARE THE SAME WITH THE FOLLOWING | | EXCEPTION: | | | | SHEET E0.01 HAS A VERSION/DATE OF V3, 7/22/16 FOR SETS | | 1 AND 3 | | SHEET E0.01 HAS A VERSION/DATE OF V2, 6/03/16 FOR SET 2 | | | | THE SHEET APPEAR THE SAME WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE | | REVISION NUMBER. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-09-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-16 |
Time |
09:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-16 |
Time |
07:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-09-16 10:07:53 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | 561-805-6724 | | | | 1. BUILDING REVIEW IS PASSED PENDING RECEIPT OF 3RD SET | | (SEE ITEM #2). | | | | 2. THE THIRD SET PROVIDED IS NOT THE SAME AS THE OTHER | | TWO SETS SUBMITTED. | | | | CIVIL SHEETS ARE NOT INCLUDED | | AE311 IS NOT THE SAME VERSION | | AE312 MISSING | | | | THE PROCESS OF CONFIRMING THAT THE THIRD SET MATCHES | | THE OTHER SETS WAS STOPPED AT THIS POINT. HAVE | | CONTRACTOR PROVIDE A THIRD SET WHICH MATCHES THE OTHER | | SETS (AS SOON AS POSSIBLE - NO ADDITIONAL REVIEWS WILL | | BE DONE UNTIL THIS IS COMPLETED). I'VE WRITTEN "SET #3" | | ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE NEW SET. PLEASE LET ME KNOW WHEN | | THIS IS COMPLETE. | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-08-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-08-16 |
Time |
08:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-08-16 |
Time |
08:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-08-16 08:11:36 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | REVISED 9/7 (ITEM 34) | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | 561-805-6724 | | | | GOVERNING CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (FBC 2014) | | | | 1. FLORIDA STATUTE 553.71, IT APPEARS THAT THIS | | BUILDING MAY QUALIFY AS A THRESHOLD BUILDING; ANY | | BUILDING WHICH IS GREATER THAN (3) STORIES OR 50 FT. IN | | HEIGHT, OR WHICH HAS AN ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY | | CLASSIFICATION AS DEFINED IN THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | WHICH EXCEEDS 5,000 SF IN AREA AND AN OCCUPANT CONTENT | | OF GREATER THAN 500 PERSONS. | | | | 2. AS A THRESHOLD BUILDING, THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: | | | | A. THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN; FS 553.79(5)(A), CITY OF | | WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION 109.3.6.1. THE | | ENFORCING AGENCY SHALL REQUIRE A SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO | | PERFORM STRUCTURAL INSPECTIONS ON A THRESHOLD BUILDING | | PURSUANT TO A STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN PREPARED BY | | THE ENGINEER OR ARCHITECT OF RECORD. THE STRUCTURAL | | INSPECTION PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY | | THE ENFORCING AGENCY BEFORE THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING | | PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A THRESHOLD BUILDING. | | THE PURPOSE OF THE STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN IS TO | | PROVIDE SPECIFIC INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND SCHEDULES SO | | THAT THE BUILDING CAN BE ADEQUATELY INSPECTED FOR | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE PERMITTED DOCUMENTS. | | | | B. THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: WPB AMENDMENT 109.3.6.2 W.P.B. | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT REQUESTS FOR THRESHOLD | | BUILDINGS A SPECIAL INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY FS | | 553.79(5)(A) TO THE MINIMUM INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY | | THIS CODE. THE THRESHOLD INSPECTION FORMS ARE REQUIRED | | TO BE FILED OUT BY ALL PARTIES, NOTARIZED AND RETURNED | | TO THIS OFFICE, REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO PERMIT | | ISSUANCE. CONTACT KEN CONRAD, MANAGER OF THE SPECIAL | | INSPECTOR PROGRAM, AT 561-805-6666 FOR ADDITIONAL | | INFORMATION. | | FORMS WERE SENT TO: [email protected] | | ON 5/28/16. | | | | C. SPECIAL INSPECTOR RESUME': PROVIDE A RESUME' OF | | INSPECTION EXPERIENCE ON PREVIOUS PROJECTS FOR REVIEW | | BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS DESIGNEE. AFTER THE | | RESUME' IS REVIEWED, AN INTERVIEW WILL BE SCHEDULED. | | UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL AN INSPECTOR BE INTERVIEWED | | FOR WORK WITHOUT FIRST MEETING THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE | | RESUME' IS TO BE SUBMITTED TO KEN CONRAD (AND COPY | | SAMANTHA HILL), 561-805-6666, [email protected], | | [email protected] | | | | ALL PROSPECTIVE INSPECTORS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY THE | | CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR AND ALL ARE REQUIRED TO SIGN | | THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR AGREEMENT. | | | | D. CONTRACTOR RESUME': PROVIDE A JOB SUMMARY OR HISTORY | | FOR THIS TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED TO | | KEN CONRAD, (PLEASE COPY SAMANTHA HILL) VIA E-MAIL | | ([email protected], [email protected]). | | | | E. PERMIT DOCUMENTS: PAPER SUBMITTALS REQUIRE THREE | | SIGNED AND SEALED (IF APPLICABLE) ORIGINAL SETS OF ALL | | DOCUMENTS. | | | | F. THRESHOLD BLDG., REQUIRED STATEMENT: W.P.B. | | AMENDMENT 110.3.7.4.4 ALL PLANS FOR THE BUILDING WHICH | | ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT | | OR ENGINEER OF RECORD CONTAIN A STATEMENT THAT, TO THE | | BEST OF THE ARCHITECT'S OR ENGINEER'S KNOWLEDGE, THE | | PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE | | MINIMUM BUILDING CODES AND THE APPLICABLE FIRESAFETY | | STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH THIS CHAPTER AND CHAPTER 633. | | | | (ARCHITECT OK - REVISED PLAN) | | | | THE ENGINEER HAS A SIMILAR STATEMENT BUT LACKS SOME OF | | THE STATUTORY LANGUAGE; PLEASE REVISE. | | | | 3. ADVISORY ONLY; PER FS 553.79, ALL SHORING/RE-SHORE | | ENGINEERING IS TO BE REVIEWED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD | | AND THREE SIGNED AND SEALED ORIGINAL SETS ARE TO BE | | SUBMITTED FOR PLAN REVIEW. THE SHORING/RESHORE | | ENGINEERING IS TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO | | INSPECTION. THE CITY APPROVED (CITY STAMPED) | | SHORING/RE-SHORE ENGINEERING IS TO BE AVAILABLE ON THE | | JOB AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION. | | | | 4. ADVISORY ONLY; PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, A GUARD RAIL | | DETAIL IS TO BE SUBMITTED FOR PLAN REVIEW. THIS SHOULD | | BE SUBMITTED WITH THE SHORING/RESHORE ENGINEERING. | | | | 5. SEE IMPACT FEE REVIEW. | | | | 6. ADVISORY ONLY; SEE ROOF (R STOP) REVIEW. NO ROOFING | | INFORMATION PROVIDED IF ROOFING INFORMATION (PRODUCT | | APPROVAL REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD, ASSEMBLY | | PROPOSED, ENHANCED FASTENING CALCULATIONS IF REQUIRED) | | IS NOT SUBMITTED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, THIS PERMIT | | WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO. ROOF INFORMATION WILL BE | | REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR | | TO INSTALLATION. | | | | 9. THREE COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS REQUIRED FOR ALL | | THRESHOLD JOBS (CITY, CONTRACTOR, THRESHOLD INSPECTOR). | | | | 11 TO 18. OK | | | | 19. LS101, ACADEMICS TEAM ROOM OCCUPANT LOAD IS SHOWN | | AS 20 SF PER PERSON, CLARIFY, APPEARS TO BE A TYPO AS | | THIS SHOULD BE 15 SF (AND OCC LOAD CALCULATED USING 15 | | SF). REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY USE OF THE SPACE. 15SF IS | | FOR AREAS WITH TABLES AND CHAIRS, AREAS WITH CHAIRS | | ONLY SHOULD USE 7 SF, AND STANDING AREAS SHOULD USE | | 5SF. | | | | 2ND REVIEW, ARCHITECT?S RESPONSE IS ACCEPTABLE. PLEASE | | REVISE PLAN TO NOTE THAT ACADEMICS TEAM ROOM IS A | | CLASSROOM, ACCESSORY USE. | | | | 20. LS101, THE ACADEMICS TEAM ROOM MEANS OF EGRESS | | FORCES THE OCCUPANT TO TRAVEL THROUGH A SPACE WHICH IS | | A WORK AREA, WHICH APPEARS TO BE PROHIBITED BY FBC | | 1014.2. REVISE PLAN TO EITHER MODIFY EXITING STRATEGY | | OR REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE (I.E., SHOW HOW THE | | TWO SPACES ARE ACCESSORY TO ONE ANOTHER). | | | | 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE STATES THAT DIRECT ACCESS TO THE | | CORRIDOR WAS PROVIDED. PLEASE SEE LS101; THE NEW ACCESS | | TO CORRIDOR APPEARS TO BE LABELED STORAGE ON ALL | | SHEETS. PLEASE REVISE THE LIFE SAFETY AND FLOOR PLAN. | | IT APPEARS THAT THE STORAGE ROOM MAY BE THE ADJACENT | | ROOM. ALSO PLEASE INCLUDE THE DIMENSION BETWEEN THE TWO | | DOORS TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 5TH EDITION | | ACCESSIBILITY FIGURE 404.2.6. | | | | 24 - 27. OK | | | | 30. OK | | | | 31 TO 33. OK | | | | 34. REVISED 9/7 - RECEIVED LETTER FROM ENGINEER | | REGARDING RATIONALE FOR RISK CATEGORY II. LETTER IS | | ACCEPTABLE; PLEASE INCLUDE THE SIGNED, SEALED ORGINAL | | WITH THE RESUBMITTAL. | | | | 35. OK | | | | 36. FBC 1008.1.10, REVISE DOOR SCHEDULE AE701 TO | | INCLUDE DOOR HARDWARE; IT IS NOT CLEAR WHERE PANIC | | HARDWARE IS PROPOSED. | | | | FBC TABLE 716.5, EXIT ENCLOSURES REQUIRE 1 HOUR DOORS; | | DOOR 101 PROPOSES 20 MIN, PLEASE REVISE. | | | | ALSO, REGARDING THIS EXIT STAIR WHICH DISCHARGES INTO | | THE FIRST FLOOR, SEE FBC 1027.1 EXCEPTION 1.1, THE EXIT | | IS TO BE READILY VISIBLE AND IDENTIFIABLE FROM THE | | POINT OF TERMINATION OF THE ENCLOSURE. PLEASE SEE | | CLARIFICATION IN THE COMMENTARY, WHICH SPECIFICALLY | | STATES THAT THE OCCUPANT SHOULD NOT BE REQUIRED TO TURN | | COMPLETELY AROUND OR AROUND A CORNER. IT APPEARS THAT | | EITHER THE DOOR SHOULD OPEN DIRECTLY INTO THE DIRECTION | | OF THE EXIT DISCHARGE OR THE WALL AT THE END OF THE | | FIRST FLOOR STAIR SHOULD BE RATED THE SAME AS THE STAIR | | IF THIS IS TO BE CONSIDERED A CONTINUATION OF THE STAIR | | EXIT. | | | | 37. FROM PREVIOUS LIST: A SPOT CHECK OF THE ENERGY | | CALCS WAS DONE; PLEASE CLARIFY THE FOLLOWING OR REVISE | | PLAN: | | ROOF INSULATION IS R20 ON ENERGY CALCS, R19 ON PLAN | | | | 2ND REVIEW, THIS WAS CORRECTED BUT STILL SPECS R19 IN | | SOME LOCATIONS (SEE AE320, AE321). PLEASE REVISE AND | | CHECK ALL. | | | | 38. THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH THE FOLLOWING | | PROVISOS: | | | | COMPONENTS AND CLADDING PRODUCT APPROVALS REVIEWED BY | | DESIGNER OF RECORD ARE TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND | | APPROVED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION | | | | SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS, REVIEWS, AND FEES WILL BE | | REQUIRED FOR SIGNS, AWNINGS, PARKING | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | | | 39. PLAN REVIEW NOTE: THIS PLAN WAS RESUBMITTED PRIOR | | TO BUILDING PLAN REVIEW #2. | | | | PLEASE SEE FS553.80 (NOTE LANGUAGE "SHALL IMPOSE" | | RATHER THAN "MAY"): | | (B)"WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS' | | DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN | | ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS | | REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO | | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY | | NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, | | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, | | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, | | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER | | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL | | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH | | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, | | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE | | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW. | | | | FOR THIS PROJECT, PLAN REVIEW FEE IS $22,637 (4X FEE = | | $90,548). IF DESIGN PROFESSIONAL DISAGREES WITH A | | SIGNIFICANT PLAN REVIEW COMMENT FOR ANY PROJECT, IT IS | | RESPECTFULLY SUGGESTED THAT THE APPROPRIATE REVIEWER BE | | CONTACTED AND RESOLVE PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING. ALTHOUGH | | LANGUAGE REQUIRES THAT THE FEE BE IMPOSED, IT IS NOT | | BEING IMPOSED AT THIS TIME DUE TO THE FACT THAT SINCE | | PLANS WERE RESUBMITTED WITHOUT ADDRESSING BUILDING | | COMMENTS FROM REVIEW 1, THIS IS BUILDING REVIEW 2 | | RATHER THAN BUILDING REVIEW 3. PLEASE ALLOW ALL TRADES | | TO COMPLETE REVIEWS PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-07-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-07-25 |
Time |
07:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-07-25 |
Time |
07:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-07-25 08:08:12 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | 561-805-6724 | | | | GOVERNING CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (FBC 2014) | | | | 1. FLORIDA STATUTE 553.71, IT APPEARS THAT THIS | | BUILDING MAY QUALIFY AS A THRESHOLD BUILDING; ANY | | BUILDING WHICH IS GREATER THAN (3) STORIES OR 50 FT. IN | | HEIGHT, OR WHICH HAS AN ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY | | CLASSIFICATION AS DEFINED IN THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | WHICH EXCEEDS 5,000 SF IN AREA AND AN OCCUPANT CONTENT | | OF GREATER THAN 500 PERSONS. | | | | 2. AS A THRESHOLD BUILDING, THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: | | | | A. THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN; FS 553.79(5)(A), CITY OF | | WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION 109.3.6.1. THE | | ENFORCING AGENCY SHALL REQUIRE A SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO | | PERFORM STRUCTURAL INSPECTIONS ON A THRESHOLD BUILDING | | PURSUANT TO A STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN PREPARED BY | | THE ENGINEER OR ARCHITECT OF RECORD. THE STRUCTURAL | | INSPECTION PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY | | THE ENFORCING AGENCY BEFORE THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING | | PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A THRESHOLD BUILDING. | | THE PURPOSE OF THE STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN IS TO | | PROVIDE SPECIFIC INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND SCHEDULES SO | | THAT THE BUILDING CAN BE ADEQUATELY INSPECTED FOR | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE PERMITTED DOCUMENTS. | | | | B. THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: WPB AMENDMENT 109.3.6.2 W.P.B. | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT REQUESTS FOR THRESHOLD | | BUILDINGS A SPECIAL INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY FS | | 553.79(5)(A) TO THE MINIMUM INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY | | THIS CODE. THE THRESHOLD INSPECTION FORMS ARE REQUIRED | | TO BE FILED OUT BY ALL PARTIES, NOTARIZED AND RETURNED | | TO THIS OFFICE, REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO PERMIT | | ISSUANCE. CONTACT KEN CONRAD, MANAGER OF THE SPECIAL | | INSPECTOR PROGRAM, AT 561-805-6666 FOR ADDITIONAL | | INFORMATION. | | FORMS WERE SENT TO: [email protected] | | ON 5/28/16. | | | | C. SPECIAL INSPECTOR RESUME': PROVIDE A RESUME' OF | | INSPECTION EXPERIENCE ON PREVIOUS PROJECTS FOR REVIEW | | BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS DESIGNEE. AFTER THE | | RESUME' IS REVIEWED, AN INTERVIEW WILL BE SCHEDULED. | | UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL AN INSPECTOR BE INTERVIEWED | | FOR WORK WITHOUT FIRST MEETING THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE | | RESUME' IS TO BE SUBMITTED TO KEN CONRAD (AND COPY | | SAMANTHA HILL), 561-805-6666, [email protected], | | [email protected] | | | | ALL PROSPECTIVE INSPECTORS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY THE | | CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR AND ALL ARE REQUIRED TO SIGN | | THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR AGREEMENT. | | | | D. CONTRACTOR RESUME': PROVIDE A JOB SUMMARY OR HISTORY | | FOR THIS TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED TO | | KEN CONRAD, (PLEASE COPY SAMANTHA HILL) VIA E-MAIL | | ([email protected], [email protected]). | | | | E. PERMIT DOCUMENTS: PAPER SUBMITTALS REQUIRE THREE | | SIGNED AND SEALED (IF APPLICABLE) ORIGINAL SETS OF ALL | | DOCUMENTS. | | | | F. THRESHOLD BLDG., REQUIRED STATEMENT: W.P.B. | | AMENDMENT 110.3.7.4.4 ALL PLANS FOR THE BUILDING WHICH | | ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT | | OR ENGINEER OF RECORD CONTAIN A STATEMENT THAT, TO THE | | BEST OF THE ARCHITECT'S OR ENGINEER'S KNOWLEDGE, THE | | PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE | | MINIMUM BUILDING CODES AND THE APPLICABLE FIRESAFETY | | STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH THIS CHAPTER AND CHAPTER 633. | | | | I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE THIS STATEMENT ON THE | | ARCHITECT'S PLANS. | | | | THE ENGINEER HAS A SIMILAR STATEMENT BUT LACKS SOME OF | | THE STATUTORY LANGUAGE; PLEASE REVISE. | | | | 3. ADVISORY ONLY; PER FS 553.79, ALL SHORING/RE-SHORE | | ENGINEERING IS TO BE REVIEWED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD | | AND THREE SIGNED AND SEALED ORIGINAL SETS ARE TO BE | | SUBMITTED FOR PLAN REVIEW. THE SHORING/RESHORE | | ENGINEERING IS TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO | | INSPECTION. THE CITY APPROVED (CITY STAMPED) | | SHORING/RE-SHORE ENGINEERING IS TO BE AVAILABLE ON THE | | JOB AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION. | | | | 4. ADVISORY ONLY; PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, A GUARD RAIL | | DETAIL IS TO BE SUBMITTED FOR PLAN REVIEW. THIS SHOULD | | BE SUBMITTED WITH THE SHORING/RESHORE ENGINEERING. | | | | 5. SEE IMPACT FEE REVIEW. | | | | 6. ADVISORY ONLY; SEE ROOF (R STOP) REVIEW. NO ROOFING | | INFORMATION PROVIDED IF ROOFING INFORMATION (PRODUCT | | APPROVAL REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD, ASSEMBLY | | PROPOSED, ENHANCED FASTENING CALCULATIONS IF REQUIRED) | | IS NOT SUBMITTED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, THIS PERMIT | | WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO. ROOF INFORMATION WILL BE | | REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR | | TO INSTALLATION. | | | | 7, 8. OK | | | | 9 ? 12. REVISE SHEETS TO ADDRESS COMMENTS 9 THROUGH 12 | | FROM REVIEW 1 AS DISCUSSED PER EMAILS AND ATTACHED PDF. | | | | 13. FBC 107, FS 553.71, SHEET LS101, PROVIDE A TOTAL | | OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THE BUILDING, BROKEN DOWN BY FLOOR | | AND OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION. | | | | 14. LS101, ROOM 145 SHOWS OCCUPANT LOAD CALCULATED AT | | 100 SF PER PERSON. FBC TABLE 1004.1.2, 50 SF GROSS | | REQUIRED, PLEASE REVISE. | | | | 15, 16. OK | | | | 17. LS101, SOME ROOMS AND SPACES DO NOT INCLUDE AN | | OCCUPANT LOAD (137, 138, 139, 140, CORRIDORS, ALL | | OTHERS AS APPLICABLE). PLEASE REVISE TO INCLUDE, FBC | | 1004. NOTE THAT DEFINITION (CHAPTER 2) OF FLOOR AREA | | GROSS INCLUDES ALL AREAS, BUT FLOOR AREA NET EXCLUDES | | UNOCCUPIED SPACE. ALTHOUGH THIS IS ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY, | | TABLE 1004.1.2 UTILIZES GROSS SF FOR THE MAJORITY OF | | THE SPACES ON THIS FLOOR. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS | | RATIONALE IS SUBSTANTIATED BY THE IBC, BUILDING 2012 | | COMMENTARY. | | | | FBC 107, IT IS ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THE ISSUES OF ROUNDING | | AND MISSING OCCUPANT LOAD WILL LIKELY NOT AFFECT THE | | LIFE SAFETY DESIGN. HOWEVER, A TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD IS | | REQUIRED FOR INFORMATION REQUIRED TO BE ON THE | | CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. | | | | 2ND REVIEW, PLEASE REVISE LIFE SAFETY PLAN AND OCCUPANT | | LOAD AS DISCUSSED VIA EMAIL. | | | | 18. BREAK ROOM 110 OCCUPANT LOAD APPEARS TO HAVE A TYPO | | (16 SF RATHER THAN 15 SF), ALSO PLEASE ROUND UP, SEE | | OTHER COMMENTS, FBC TABLE 1004.1.2. | | | | 19. LS101, ACADEMICS TEAM ROOM OCCUPANT LOAD IS SHOWN | | AS 20 SF PER PERSON, CLARIFY, APPEARS TO BE A TYPO AS | | THIS SHOULD BE 15 SF (AND OCC LOAD CALCULATED USING 15 | | SF). REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY USE OF THE SPACE. 15SF IS | | FOR AREAS WITH TABLES AND CHAIRS, AREAS WITH CHAIRS | | ONLY SHOULD USE 7 SF, AND STANDING AREAS SHOULD USE | | 5SF. | | | | 20. LS101, THE ACADEMICS TEAM ROOM MEANS OF EGRESS | | FORCES THE OCCUPANT TO TRAVEL THROUGH A SPACE WHICH IS | | A WORK AREA, WHICH APPEARS TO BE PROHIBITED BY FBC | | 1014.2. REVISE PLAN TO EITHER MODIFY EXITING STRATEGY | | OR REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE (I.E., SHOW HOW THE | | TWO SPACES ARE ACCESSORY TO ONE ANOTHER). | | | | IF THE RESUBMITTAL PROPOSES TO MAINTAIN EGRESS FROM AN | | A2 AREA THROUGH A WORK AREA, PLEASE GET THIS ITEM | | REVIEWED PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL VIA EMAIL. | | | | 21. LS 101 AND LS 102, NO DIMENSIONS WERE INCLUDED ON | | THE PLAN, OR ON THE OTHER A SHEETS. ADD OVERALL | | DIMENSIONS. REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMMON PATH IN ROOM | | 145, FBC 1014.3. | | | | 22. TRAVEL DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS NOTES ARE INCLUDED IN | | CODE REVIEW SECTION OF THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN, BUT NO | | TRAVEL DISTANCES SHOWN. PLEASE REVISE TO INCLUDE WORST | | CASE, FBC 107. | | | | 23. OK | | | | 24. LS 101, EXITING STRATEGY VESTIBULE 128 IS NOT | | CLEAR, SEE FBC 1005.7.1, REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE | | OR CLARIFY MEANS OF EGRESS PATH. LS101 SHOWS AN ARROW | | THROUGH THE VESTIBULE, BUT WHEN BOTH DOORS ARE IN THE | | OPEN POSITION, THE CORRIDOR APPEARS TO BE ALMOST | | ENTIRELY BLOCKED. | | | | 25. FBC 1011.1, REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE ALL REQUIRED | | EXIT SIGNS. | | | | LS101, PLEASE ADD AN EXIT SIGN AT CORRIDOR 164, BETWEEN | | ICE AND WET ROOM, OR REVISE EXIT ACCESS. | | | | 26. 2ND REVIEW, PLEASE REVISE PLAN AS DISCUSSED VIA | | EMAIL. | | | | 26. FBC 1007, REVISE PLAN TO INDICATE METHOD OF | | ACCESSIBLE MEANS OF EGRESS SELECTED, REVISE PLAN TO | | SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH METHOD SELECTED. | | | | 27. OK | | | | 28. ACCESSIBILITY NOT ADDRESSED ON THIS PLAN: | | | | 206.2.13, EXERCISE MACHINES AND EQUIPMENT | | 241, SAUNAS AND STEAM ROOMS | | 222, LOCKER ROOMS | | 226, DINING SURFACES (TERRACES) | | | | THESE ITEMS CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH NOTES ON THE PLAN, | | SHOP DRAWINGS TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. | | | | 29. AE 112, PROVIDE DIMENSION OF CLEARANCE, 18IN | | MINIMUM, PULL SIDE, FOR DOOR A121, FBC 5TH ED | | ACCESSIBILITY FIGURE 404.2.4.1(A). | | | | 30. REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 404.6, | | ENCLOSURE OF ATRIUMS (FP SHEETS, LS SHEETS). THE NOTE | | ON LS SHEETS REFERS TO THE SMOKE PARTITION, BUT I WAS | | UNABLE TO LOCATE THE REFERENCE TO WINDOW SPRINKLERS. | | | | 31. LS101 AND 102, REVISE INTERIOR FINISH NOTES TO | | INCLUDE ATRIUM REQUIREMENT, FBC 404.8. | | | | 32. FBC 107, 703.1, PROVIDE DETAILS (ASSEMBLIES) FOR | | THE FIRE RATED ELEMENTS. | | | | 33. AE801 RATED STUD PARTITION DOES NOT SPECIFY THE UL | | NUMBER, PLEASE REVISE TO INCLUDE, FBC 703. | | | | 34. NOTE CD 01 STATES THIS WAS DESIGNED PER FBC. FBC | | TABLE 1604.5, RISK CATEGORY III INCLUDES BUILDINGS OF | | ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD OVER 300, | | SHEET S0.01 INDICATES THIS BUILDING WAS DESIGNED AS | | RISK CATEGORY II, PLEASE REVISE. | | | | 35. PLEASE REVISE FLOOR PLAN TO INCLUDE THE GATE SHOWN | | ON DETAIL AE712. IF THIS GATE IS IN THE EXIT DISCHARGE, | | REVISE THE DETAIL TO DEPICT THE REQUIRED PANIC | | HARDWARE, FBC 1008.2. | | | | 36. FBC 1008.1.10, REVISE DOOR SCHEDULE AE701 TO | | INCLUDE DOOR HARDWARE; IT IS NOT CLEAR WHERE PANIC | | HARDWARE IS PROPOSED. | | | | 37. A SPOT CHECK OF THE ENERGY CALCS WAS DONE; PLEASE | | CLARIFY THE FOLLOWING OR REVISE PLAN: | | ROOF INSULATION IS R20 ON ENERGY CALCS, R19 ON PLAN | | WALL INSULATION IS R3.9 ON ENERGY CALCS, UNABLE TO | | LOCATE ON PLAN | | WATER HEATER SECTION IS BLANK | | EXTERIOR LIGHTING IS BLANK | | FLOOR R VALUE 3.73, CLARIFY | | | | 38. THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH THE FOLLOWING | | PROVISOS: | | | | COMPONENTS AND CLADDING PRODUCT APPROVALS REVIEWED BY | | DESIGNER OF RECORD ARE TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND | | APPROVED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION | | | | SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS, REVIEWS, AND FEES WILL BE | | REQUIRED FOR SIGNS, AWNINGS, PARKING | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-06-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-06-06 |
Time |
11:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-06-06 |
Time |
11:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-06-06 11:34:42 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | 561-805-6724 | | | | GOVERNING CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (FBC 2014) | | | | 1. FLORIDA STATUTE 553.71, IT APPEARS THAT THIS | | BUILDING MAY QUALIFY AS A THRESHOLD BUILDING; ANY | | BUILDING WHICH IS GREATER THAN (3) STORIES OR 50 FT. IN | | HEIGHT, OR WHICH HAS AN ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY | | CLASSIFICATION AS DEFINED IN THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | WHICH EXCEEDS 5,000 SF IN AREA AND AN OCCUPANT CONTENT | | OF GREATER THAN 500 PERSONS. | | | | 2. AS A THRESHOLD BUILDING, THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: | | | | A. THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN; FS 553.79(5)(A), CITY OF | | WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION 109.3.6.1. THE | | ENFORCING AGENCY SHALL REQUIRE A SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO | | PERFORM STRUCTURAL INSPECTIONS ON A THRESHOLD BUILDING | | PURSUANT TO A STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN PREPARED BY | | THE ENGINEER OR ARCHITECT OF RECORD. THE STRUCTURAL | | INSPECTION PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY | | THE ENFORCING AGENCY BEFORE THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING | | PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A THRESHOLD BUILDING. | | THE PURPOSE OF THE STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN IS TO | | PROVIDE SPECIFIC INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND SCHEDULES SO | | THAT THE BUILDING CAN BE ADEQUATELY INSPECTED FOR | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE PERMITTED DOCUMENTS. | | | | B. THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: WPB AMENDMENT 109.3.6.2 W.P.B. | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT REQUESTS FOR THRESHOLD | | BUILDINGS A SPECIAL INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY FS | | 553.79(5)(A) TO THE MINIMUM INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY | | THIS CODE. THE THRESHOLD INSPECTION FORMS ARE REQUIRED | | TO BE FILED OUT BY ALL PARTIES, NOTARIZED AND RETURNED | | TO THIS OFFICE, REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO PERMIT | | ISSUANCE. CONTACT KEN CONRAD, MANAGER OF THE SPECIAL | | INSPECTOR PROGRAM, AT 561-805-6666 FOR ADDITIONAL | | INFORMATION. | | FORMS WERE SENT TO: [email protected] | | ON 5/28/16. | | | | C. SPECIAL INSPECTOR RESUME': PROVIDE A RESUME' OF | | INSPECTION EXPERIENCE ON PREVIOUS PROJECTS FOR REVIEW | | BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS DESIGNEE. AFTER THE | | RESUME' IS REVIEWED, AN INTERVIEW WILL BE SCHEDULED. | | UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL AN INSPECTOR BE INTERVIEWED | | FOR WORK WITHOUT FIRST MEETING THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE | | RESUME' IS TO BE SUBMITTED TO KEN CONRAD (AND COPY | | SAMANTHA HILL), 561-805-6666, [email protected], | | [email protected] | | | | ALL PROSPECTIVE INSPECTORS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY THE | | CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR AND ALL ARE REQUIRED TO SIGN | | THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR AGREEMENT. | | | | D. CONTRACTOR RESUME': PROVIDE A JOB SUMMARY OR HISTORY | | FOR THIS TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED TO | | KEN CONRAD, (PLEASE COPY SAMANTHA HILL) VIA E-MAIL | | ([email protected], [email protected]). | | | | E. PERMIT DOCUMENTS: PAPER SUBMITTALS REQUIRE THREE | | SIGNED AND SEALED (IF APPLICABLE) ORIGINAL SETS OF ALL | | DOCUMENTS. | | | | F. THRESHOLD BLDG., REQUIRED STATEMENT: W.P.B. | | AMENDMENT 110.3.7.4.4 ALL PLANS FOR THE BUILDING WHICH | | ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT | | OR ENGINEER OF RECORD CONTAIN A STATEMENT THAT, TO THE | | BEST OF THE ARCHITECT'S OR ENGINEER'S KNOWLEDGE, THE | | PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE | | MINIMUM BUILDING CODES AND THE APPLICABLE FIRESAFETY | | STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH THIS CHAPTER AND CHAPTER 633. | | | | I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE THIS STATEMENT ON THE | | ARCHITECT'S PLANS. | | | | THE ENGINEER HAS A SIMILAR STATEMENT BUT LACKS SOME OF | | THE STATUTORY LANGUAGE; PLEASE REVISE. | | | | 3. ADVISORY ONLY; PER FS 553.79, ALL SHORING/RE-SHORE | | ENGINEERING IS TO BE REVIEWED BY ENGINEER OF RECORD | | AND THREE SIGNED AND SEALED ORIGINAL SETS ARE TO BE | | SUBMITTED FOR PLAN REVIEW. THE SHORING/RESHORE | | ENGINEERING IS TO BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO | | INSPECTION. THE CITY APPROVED (CITY STAMPED) | | SHORING/RE-SHORE ENGINEERING IS TO BE AVAILABLE ON THE | | JOB AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION. | | | | 4. ADVISORY ONLY; PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, A GUARD RAIL | | DETAIL IS TO BE SUBMITTED FOR PLAN REVIEW. THIS SHOULD | | BE SUBMITTED WITH THE SHORING/RESHORE ENGINEERING. | | | | 5. SEE IMPACT FEE REVIEW. | | | | 6. ADVISORY ONLY; SEE ROOF (R STOP) REVIEW. NO ROOFING | | INFORMATION PROVIDED IF ROOFING INFORMATION (PRODUCT | | APPROVAL REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD, ASSEMBLY | | PROPOSED, ENHANCED FASTENING CALCULATIONS IF REQUIRED) | | IS NOT SUBMITTED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, THIS PERMIT | | WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO. ROOF INFORMATION WILL BE | | REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR | | TO INSTALLATION. | | | | 7. DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR | | PUBLIC RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED | | ORIGINALS. SHEETS C1 THROUGH C4 PREPARED BY RICHARD | | REIKENIS, PE ARE COPIES. THESE PAGES LACK THE | | CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION, REFERENCE AN OUTDATED | | BUILDING CODE, AND THE SEAL LACKS A DATE. ALSO, PLEASE | | NOTE THAT THIS ENGINEER HAS NOT YET COMPLIED WITH FS | | 471.0195, FAC 61G15-22.01 (MANDATORY BY JUNE 30, 2016). | | NOTE THAT THIS ENGINEER, ALTHOUGH RESPONSIBLE FOR CIVIL | | SHEETS, HAS REFERENCED ACCESSIBILITY ON HIS PLAN. SEE | | PAGE 4 OF THE APRIL EDITION OF THE FBPE NEWSLETTER FOR | | MORE INFORMATION: | | | | HTTPS://WWW.FBPE.ORG/INDEX.PHP/FILE-DOWNLOADS/SEND/56- | | 2015-2016-FBPE-NEWSLETTERS/377-APRIL-2016-FBPE-NEWSLET | | TER | | | | 8. GENERAL ADVISORY TO ALL ENGINEERS WHO DESIGN | | BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, FACILITIES OR SYSTEMS COVERED BY | | THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, ALL ENGINEERS ARE REQUIRED | | TO COMPLETE THE ADVANCED BUILDING CODE COURSE BY JUNE | | 30, 2016, FS471.0195 AND FAC61G15-22.001. UPON | | COMPLETION OF THE COURSE, FBPE IS TO BE PROVIDED WITH A | | COPY OF THE COMPLETION CERTIFICATE SO THAT THE | | ENGINEER?S LICENSE RECORD ON WWW.MYFLORIDALICENSE.COM | | WEBSITE WILL BE BEEN UPDATED. | | | | CURRENTLY, MORE INFORMATION REGARDING THIS COURSE CAN | | BE FOUND ON THE FBPE HOME PAGE, LATEST NEWS: | | | | WWW.FBPE.ORG | | | | AND ALSO ON PAGE 4 OF THE FBPE NEWSLETTER: | | | | HTTPS://WWW.FBPE.ORG/INDEX.PHP/FILE-DOWNLOADS/SEND/56-2 | | 015-2016-FBPE-NEWSLETTERS/377-APRIL-2016-FBPE-NEWSLETT | | ER | | | | 9. THREE COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS REQUIRED FOR ALL | | THRESHOLD (AND RESIDENT INSPECTOR) JOBS, FBC 107. | | | | 10. FBC 506, REVISE PLAN TO SHOW THE DISTANCE BETWEEN | | THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE AND THE EXISTING BLEACHERS, AND | | PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR THE EXISTING BLEACHERS. | | | | 11. FBC 506, PROVIDE DIMENSIONS AND IDENTIFICATION FOR | | THE LARGE UNIDENTIFIED RECTANGLE, NORTHWEST SIDE. | | | | 12. FBC 506.2.2, SHOW DISTANCE FROM THE WEST SIDE OF | | THE BUILDING TO THE FIRE LANE. | | | | 13. FBC 107, FS 553.71, SHEET LS101, PROVIDE A TOTAL | | OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THE BUILDING, BROKEN DOWN BY FLOOR | | AND OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION. | | | | 14. LS101, ROOM 145 SHOWS OCCUPANT LOAD CALCULATED AT | | 100 SF PER PERSON. FBC TABLE 1004.1.2, 50 SF GROSS | | REQUIRED, PLEASE REVISE. | | | | 15. LS101, ROOM 165 APPEARS TO HAVE A TYPO (230 | | OCCUPANT LOAD). EITHER CORRECT OR PROVIDE ADDITIONAL | | MEANS OF EGRESS, FBC 1015. | | | | 16. LS101, ROOMS 148, 149 152, 159, ANY OTHER ROOMS AS | | APPLICABLE, PLEASE ROUND UP FOR OCCUPANT LOAD, FBC | | TABLE 1004.1.2. | | | | 17. LS101, SOME ROOMS AND SPACES DO NOT INCLUDE AN | | OCCUPANT LOAD (137, 138, 139, 140, CORRIDORS, ALL | | OTHERS AS APPLICABLE). PLEASE REVISE TO INCLUDE, FBC | | 1004. NOTE THAT DEFINITION (CHAPTER 2) OF FLOOR AREA | | GROSS INCLUDES ALL AREAS, BUT FLOOR AREA NET EXCLUDES | | UNOCCUPIED SPACE. ALTHOUGH THIS IS ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY, | | TABLE 1004.1.2 UTILIZES GROSS SF FOR THE MAJORITY OF | | THE SPACES ON THIS FLOOR. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS | | RATIONALE IS SUBSTANTIATED BY THE IBC, BUILDING 2012 | | COMMENTARY. | | | | FBC 107, IT IS ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THE ISSUES OF ROUNDING | | AND MISSING OCCUPANT LOAD WILL LIKELY NOT AFFECT THE | | LIFE SAFETY DESIGN. HOWEVER, A TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD IS | | REQUIRED FOR INFORMATION REQUIRED TO BE ON THE | | CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. | | | | 18. BREAK ROOM 110 OCCUPANT LOAD APPEARS TO HAVE A TYPO | | (16 SF RATHER THAN 15 SF), ALSO PLEASE ROUND UP, SEE | | OTHER COMMENTS, FBC TABLE 1004.1.2. | | | | 19. LS101, ACADEMICS TEAM ROOM OCCUPANT LOAD IS SHOWN | | AS 20 SF PER PERSON, CLARIFY, APPEARS TO BE A TYPO AS | | THIS SHOULD BE 15 SF (AND OCC LOAD CALCULATED USING 15 | | SF). REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY USE OF THE SPACE. 15SF IS | | FOR AREAS WITH TABLES AND CHAIRS, AREAS WITH CHAIRS | | ONLY SHOULD USE 7 SF, AND STANDING AREAS SHOULD USE | | 5SF. | | | | 20. LS101, THE ACADEMICS TEAM ROOM MEANS OF EGRESS | | FORCES THE OCCUPANT TO TRAVEL THROUGH A SPACE WHICH IS | | A WORK AREA, WHICH APPEARS TO BE PROHIBITED BY FBC | | 1014.2. REVISE PLAN TO EITHER MODIFY EXITING STRATEGY | | OR REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE (I.E., SHOW HOW THE | | TWO SPACES ARE ACCESSORY TO ONE ANOTHER). | | | | IF THE RESUBMITTAL PROPOSES TO MAINTAIN EGRESS FROM AN | | A2 AREA THROUGH A WORK AREA, PLEASE GET THIS ITEM | | REVIEWED PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL VIA EMAIL. | | | | 21. LS 101 AND LS 102, NO DIMENSIONS WERE INCLUDED ON | | THE PLAN, OR ON THE OTHER A SHEETS. ADD OVERALL | | DIMENSIONS. REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMMON PATH IN ROOM | | 145, FBC 1014.3. | | | | 22. TRAVEL DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS NOTES ARE INCLUDED IN | | CODE REVIEW SECTION OF THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN, BUT NO | | TRAVEL DISTANCES SHOWN. PLEASE REVISE TO INCLUDE WORST | | CASE, FBC 107. | | | | 23. FBC 1022.5 AND .6, MECHANICAL SHEETS APPEAR TO SHOW | | A DUCT INTO THE EXIT STAIR, PLEASE REMOVE. | | | | 24. LS 101, EXITING STRATEGY VESTIBULE 128 IS NOT | | CLEAR, SEE FBC 1005.7.1, REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE | | OR CLARIFY MEANS OF EGRESS PATH. LS101 SHOWS AN ARROW | | THROUGH THE VESTIBULE, BUT WHEN BOTH DOORS ARE IN THE | | OPEN POSITION, THE CORRIDOR APPEARS TO BE ALMOST | | ENTIRELY BLOCKED. | | | | 25. FBC 1011.1, REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE ALL REQUIRED | | EXIT SIGNS. | | | | 26. FBC 107, 1004, 1008, USE OF THE HOSPITALITY SPACES | | ON THE SECOND FLOOR AND HOW OCCUPANT LOAD WAS | | DETERMINED IS NOT CLEAR. A TABLE AND CHAIR OCCUPANT | | LOAD (15SF) WAS USED FOR TERRACES, AND STANDING (5SF) | | FOR INDOORS. WILL OCCUPANTS NEVER BE ALLOWED TO STAND | | OUTDOORS IN THE TERRACES? IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY DIFFERENT | | METHODS WERE USED WHEN IT APPEARS THAT THE TERRACES ARE | | EXTENSIONS OF THE HOSPITALITY SPACE. IT APPEARS | | POSSIBLE THAT 5SF PER PERSON SHOULD BE USED FOR THE | | TERRACES. PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION OR REVISE OCCUPANT | | LOAD, NUMBER OF EXITS, DOOR SWING. PLEASE CONTACT ME IF | | YOU WISH TO DISCUSS. | | | | 26. FBC 1007, REVISE PLAN TO INDICATE METHOD OF | | ACCESSIBLE MEANS OF EGRESS SELECTED, REVISE PLAN TO | | SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH METHOD SELECTED. | | | | 27. PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE ACCESSIBLE SHOWER, FBC 5TH | | EDITION ACCESSIBILITY 608. | | | | 28. ACCESSIBILITY NOT ADDRESSED ON THIS PLAN: | | | | 206.2.13, EXERCISE MACHINES AND EQUIPMENT | | 241, SAUNAS AND STEAM ROOMS | | 222, LOCKER ROOMS | | 226, DINING SURFACES (TERRACES) | | | | THESE ITEMS CAN BE ADDRESSED WITH NOTES ON THE PLAN, | | SHOP DRAWINGS TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. | | | | 29. AE 112, PROVIDE DIMENSION OF CLEARANCE, 18IN | | MINIMUM, PULL SIDE, FOR DOOR A121, FBC 5TH ED | | ACCESSIBILITY FIGURE 404.2.4.1(A). | | | | 30. REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 404.6, | | ENCLOSURE OF ATRIUMS (FP SHEETS, LS SHEETS). THE NOTE | | ON LS SHEETS REFERS TO THE SMOKE PARTITION, BUT I WAS | | UNABLE TO LOCATE THE REFERENCE TO WINDOW SPRINKLERS. | | | | 31. LS101 AND 102, REVISE INTERIOR FINISH NOTES TO | | INCLUDE ATRIUM REQUIREMENT, FBC 404.8. | | | | 32. FBC 107, 703.1, PROVIDE DETAILS (ASSEMBLIES) FOR | | THE FIRE RATED ELEMENTS. | | | | 33. AE801 RATED STUD PARTITION DOES NOT SPECIFY THE UL | | NUMBER, PLEASE REVISE TO INCLUDE, FBC 703. | | | | 34. NOTE CD 01 STATES THIS WAS DESIGNED PER FBC. FBC | | TABLE 1604.5, RISK CATEGORY III INCLUDES BUILDINGS OF | | ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD OVER 300, | | SHEET S0.01 INDICATES THIS BUILDING WAS DESIGNED AS | | RISK CATEGORY II, PLEASE REVISE. | | | | 35. PLEASE REVISE FLOOR PLAN TO INCLUDE THE GATE SHOWN | | ON DETAIL AE712. IF THIS GATE IS IN THE EXIT DISCHARGE, | | REVISE THE DETAIL TO DEPICT THE REQUIRED PANIC | | HARDWARE, FBC 1008.2. | | | | 36. FBC 1008.1.10, REVISE DOOR SCHEDULE AE701 TO | | INCLUDE DOOR HARDWARE; IT IS NOT CLEAR WHERE PANIC | | HARDWARE IS PROPOSED. | | | | 37. A SPOT CHECK OF THE ENERGY CALCS WAS DONE; PLEASE | | CLARIFY THE FOLLOWING OR REVISE PLAN: | | ROOF INSULATION IS R20 ON ENERGY CALCS, R19 ON PLAN | | WALL INSULATION IS R3.9 ON ENERGY CALCS, UNABLE TO | | LOCATE ON PLAN | | WATER HEATER SECTION IS BLANK | | EXTERIOR LIGHTING IS BLANK | | FLOOR R VALUE 3.73, CLARIFY | | | | 38. THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH THE FOLLOWING | | PROVISOS: | | | | COMPONENTS AND CLADDING PRODUCT APPROVALS REVIEWED BY | | DESIGNER OF RECORD ARE TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND | | APPROVED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION | | | | SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS, REVIEWS, AND FEES WILL BE | | REQUIRED FOR SIGNS, AWNINGS, PARKING | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-09-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
vperez |
Date |
2016-09-19 |
Time |
07:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
vperez |
Date |
2016-09-19 |
Time |
07:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-09-19 08:13:06 | PLANS APPROVED PENDING SET #2 LABELED CONTRACTOR SET | | MISSING 3 SHEETS E 2.01-2.02-2.03 PROVIDE FOR STAMPS |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-08-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
vperez |
Date |
2016-08-13 |
Time |
14:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
vperez |
Date |
2016-08-13 |
Time |
14:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-07-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
vperez |
Date |
2016-07-11 |
Time |
14:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
vperez |
Date |
2016-07-11 |
Time |
09:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-07-11 14:06:53 | 2ND ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | | APPLICABLE CODES IN EFFECT: | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2014 5TH EDITION | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2014 5TH | | EDITION | | NFPA 70- 2011 NEC | | PENDING COMMENTS: | | | | NO COMMENTS FOR ELECTRICAL ADDRESSED SEE BELOW PREVIOUS | | COMMENTS. | | | | 1. GENERAL NOTES- PROVIDE A BLOCK NOTE INDICATING THE | | REQUIRED SEPARATE PERMITS AND DATA CUT SHEET SUBMITTALS | | FOR ALL LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS TO INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED | | TO FIRE ALARM, ACCESS CONTROLS, CCTV, PHONE AND DATA, | | SIGNAGE, WIRELESS SYSTEMS, ETC. A NOTE WILL SUFFICE. | | 2. PROVIDE A NOTE/SIGN TO INDICATE THE REQUIREMENTS NEC | | 110.24 THE MAX. AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT SHALL BE | | DURABLY MARKED AND DATED ON ALL ELECTRICAL APPARATUS | | AND NEC 110.16 ARC-FLASH HAZARD WARNING LABELS | | REQUIRED. | | 3. PER FBC EC 405.7.3- SHOW VOLTAGE DROP CALCULATIONS | | FOR FEEDERS AND BRANCH CIRCUITS. | | 4. PER FBC EC 405.7- 50% OF ALL RECEPTACLES 125V, 15 | | AND 20A MUST BE AUTOMATICALLY CONTROLLED WHERE | | INSTALLED IN PRIVATE OFFICES, OPEN OFFICES, AND | | COMPUTER CLASSROOMS. THIS INCLUDES THOSE INSTALLED IN | | MODULAR PARTITIONS. SHOW COMPLIANCE. | | 5. PLEASE ADDRESS FIRE COMMENTS RELATED TO THE | | ELECTRICAL DESIGN. | | 6. LABEL GFCI ALL RECEPTACLES IN THE MEN?S AND WOMEN?S | | LOCKER ROOMS PER NEC 210.8B7 | | 7. LABEL GFCI ALL RECEPTACLES WITHIN 6FT OF SINKS, SEE | | SERVING PANTRY?S AREA. NEC 210.8B5 | | 8. LABEL GFCI CIRCUIT LB-40 ELEVATOR SUMP PUMP SHOWS A | | DUPLEX RECEPTACLE. IF IT?S A SINGLE RECEPTACLE SHOW | | CORRECT SYMBOL. NEC 620.85 | | 9. SHOW THE AIC RATING PER UTILITY COMPANY LETTERHEAD | | AT THE TRANSFORMER. FBC 107.3.5 | | 10. PROVIDE AIC CALCULATION FOR THE NEW SERVICE. | | 11. REFLECT ON PANEL SCHEDULE THE CONDUCTORS SIZE | | SELECTED FOR ALL BRANCH CICUITS. FBC 107.3.5 | | 12. CLARIFY THE LOCATION OF THE ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM. | | 13. COMMENTS MAY FOLLOW UPON RE-REVIEW. PLEASE FEEL | | FREE TO CONTACT ME SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS | | REGARDING THIS PROJECT. | | | | | | VALENTINO PEREZ | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER II | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-06-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
vperez |
Date |
2016-06-23 |
Time |
14:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
vperez |
Date |
2016-06-23 |
Time |
14:04 |
Sent To |
ENG |
|
Notes |
2016-06-23 14:15:28 | INITIAL ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | | APPLICABLE CODES IN EFFECT: | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2014 5TH EDITION | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2014 5TH | | EDITION | | NFPA 70- 2011 NEC | | COMMENTS: | | | | 1. GENERAL NOTES- PROVIDE A BLOCK NOTE INDICATING THE | | REQUIRED SEPARATE PERMITS AND DATA CUT SHEET SUBMITTALS | | FOR ALL LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS TO INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED | | TO FIRE ALARM, ACCESS CONTROLS, CCTV, PHONE AND DATA, | | SIGNAGE, WIRELESS SYSTEMS, ETC. A NOTE WILL SUFFICE. | | 2. PROVIDE A NOTE/SIGN TO INDICATE THE REQUIREMENTS NEC | | 110.24 THE MAX. AVAILABLE FAULT CURRENT SHALL BE | | DURABLY MARKED AND DATED ON ALL ELECTRICAL APPARATUS | | AND NEC 110.16 ARC-FLASH HAZARD WARNING LABELS | | REQUIRED. | | 3. PER FBC EC 405.7.3- SHOW VOLTAGE DROP CALCULATIONS | | FOR FEEDERS AND BRANCH CIRCUITS. | | 4. PER FBC EC 405.7- 50% OF ALL RECEPTACLES 125V, 15 | | AND 20A MUST BE AUTOMATICALLY CONTROLLED WHERE | | INSTALLED IN PRIVATE OFFICES, OPEN OFFICES, AND | | COMPUTER CLASSROOMS. THIS INCLUDES THOSE INSTALLED IN | | MODULAR PARTITIONS. SHOW COMPLIANCE. | | 5. PLEASE ADDRESS FIRE COMMENTS RELATED TO THE | | ELECTRICAL DESIGN. | | 6. LABEL GFCI ALL RECEPTACLES IN THE MEN?S AND WOMEN?S | | LOCKER ROOMS PER NEC 210.8B7 | | 7. LABEL GFCI ALL RECEPTACLES WITHIN 6FT OF SINKS, SEE | | SERVING PANTRY?S AREA. NEC 210.8B5 | | 8. LABEL GFCI CIRCUIT LB-40 ELEVATOR SUMP PUMP SHOWS A | | DUPLEX RECEPTACLE. IF IT?S A SINGLE RECEPTACLE SHOW | | CORRECT SYMBOL. NEC 620.85 | | 9. SHOW THE AIC RATING PER UTILITY COMPANY LETTERHEAD | | AT THE TRANSFORMER. FBC 107.3.5 | | 10. PROVIDE AIC CALCULATION FOR THE NEW SERVICE. | | 11. REFLECT ON PANEL SCHEDULE THE CONDUCTORS SIZE | | SELECTED FOR ALL BRANCH CICUITS. FBC 107.3.5 | | 12. CLARIFY THE LOCATION OF THE ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM. | | 13. COMMENTS MAY FOLLOW UPON RE-REVIEW. PLEASE FEEL | | FREE TO CONTACT ME SHOULD YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS | | REGARDING THIS PROJECT. | | | | | | VALENTINO PEREZ | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER II | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-09-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
Mgonzale |
Date |
2016-09-19 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2016-09-19 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
2016-09-19 19:20:01 | PROVISOS: | | | | #1 OBTAIN UG FIRELINE PERMIT FOR FIRELINE AND PLUMBING | | PERMIT FOR WATER SERVICE CONNECTION/BACKFLOW. | | | | #2 SUBMIT THE DCDA AND RPPA BACKFLOWS MUST BE LEAD | | FREE, | | | | #3 CUSTOMER SERVICE MUST APPROVE SERVICE LOCATIONS. ANY | | OBSTRUCTIONS MUST BE ADDRESSED. | | SERVICE LOCATIONS SHALL BE LANDSCAPED LEAVING ADEQUATE | | CLEARANCE FOR MAINTENANCE TO BACKFLOWS. | | | | #4 TAPPS TO WATER LINES WILL REQUIRE PRESENCE OF CITY | | OF WPB ENGINEERING PERSONNEL. OBTAIN ENGINEERING | | DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL | | FOR PUBLIC UTILITIE SERVICES. | | | | MANUEL JULIAN GONZALEZ | | ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | HTTP://WWW.WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS | | /FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | IMPORTANT MESSAGE: AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015 THE CITY OF | | WEST PALM BEACH | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | MAKING KNOWN THAT "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD | | FREE." | | FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI | | CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-06-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
Mgonzale |
Date |
2016-06-29 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2016-06-29 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
2016-06-29 13:09:36 | PLEASE ADDRESS FIRE AND PLUMBING COMMENTS. | | | | IMPORTANT MESSAGE: AS OF DECEMBER 20, 2015 THE CITY OF | | WEST PALM BEACH | | CROSS-CONNECTION CONTROL MANUAL HAS BEEN REVISED, | | MAKING KNOWN THAT "ALL BACKFLOW DEVICES MUST BE LEAD | | FREE." | | FOR MORE INFORMATION REFER TO THE LINK BELOW: | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/PUBLIC-UTILITIES/FORMS-PUBLI | | CATIONS/BACKFLOW-CROSS-CONNECTION-CONTROL-MANUAL | | | | EMAIL SPECIFICATIONS SHEETS FOR "LEAD FREE" DCDA AND | | RPPA DEVICES. TO [email protected] | | | | MANUEL JULIAN GONZALEZ | | ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-09-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2016-09-20 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2016-09-20 |
Time |
11:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-08-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2016-08-17 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2016-08-16 |
Time |
16:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-07-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2016-07-15 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2016-07-14 |
Time |
16:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-05-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2016-05-10 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2016-05-09 |
Time |
12:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-05-09 15:25:00 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE | | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | 1) SHEET LS 101 - STAIR 1 INDICATES ITS EXIT TO THE | | INTERIOR OB THE BUILDING. THE EXIT DOES NOT MEET THE | | REQUIREMENTS BELOW # 1, 136 OCCUPANTS VS 105 FOR STAIR | | # 2. AND # 3 THE EXIT PATH IS READILY VISIBLE AND | | IDENTIFIABLE. | | | | AN EXTERIOR EXIT DOOR IS REQUIRED IN STAIR # 1. | | | | PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 12, NEW ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES, | | 12.2.7 DISCHARGE FROM EXITS. | | 12.2.7.1 EXIT DISCHARGE SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 7.7. | | | | 7.7 DISCHARGE FROM EXITS. | | 7.7.1* EXIT TERMINATION. EXITS SHALL TERMINATE | | DIRECTLY, AT A PUBLIC WAY OR AT AN EXTERIOR EXIT | | DISCHARGE, UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN 7.7.1.2 THROUGH | | 7.7.1.4. | | 7.7.2 EXIT DISCHARGE THROUGH INTERIOR BUILDING AREAS. | | EXITS SHALL BE PERMITTED TO DISCHARGE THROUGH INTERIOR | | BUILDING AREAS, PROVIDED THAT ALL OF THE FOLLOWING ARE | | MET: | | (1) NOT MORE THAN 50 PERCENT OF THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF | | EXITS, AND NOT MORE THAN 50 PERCENT OF THE REQUIRED | | EGRESS CAPACITY, SHALL DISCHARGE THROUGH AREAS ON ANY | | LEVEL OF DISCHARGE, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PERMITTED BY | | ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: | | (A) ONE HUNDRED PERCENT OF THE EXITS SHALL BE PERMITTED | | TO DISCHARGE THROUGH AREAS ON ANY LEVEL OF DISCHARGE IN | | DETENTION AND CORRECTIONAL OCCUPANCIES AS OTHERWISE | | PROVIDED IN CHAPTERS 22 AND 23. | | (B) IN EXISTING BUILDINGS, THE 50 PERCENT LIMIT ON | | EGRESS CAPACITY SHALL NOT APPLY IF THE 50 PERCENT LIMIT | | ON THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF EXITS IS MET. | | (2) EACH LEVEL OF DISCHARGE SHALL DISCHARGE DIRECTLY | | OUTSIDE AT THE FINISHED GROUND LEVEL OR DISCHARGE | | DIRECTLY OUTSIDE AND PROVIDE ACCESS TO THE FINISHED | | GROUND LEVEL BY OUTSIDE STAIRS OR OUTSIDE RAMPS. | | (3) THE INTERIOR EXIT DISCHARGE SHALL LEAD TO A FREE | | AND UNOBSTRUCTED WAY TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING, | | AND SUCHWAY SHALL BE READILY VISIBLE AND IDENTIFIABLE | | FROM THE POINT OF DISCHARGE FROM THE EXIT. | | (4) THE INTERIOR EXIT DISCHARGE SHALL BE PROTECTED BY | | ONE OF THE FOLLOWING METHODS: | | (A) THE LEVEL OF DISCHARGE SHALL BE PROTECTED | | THROUGHOUT BY AN APPROVED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.7, OR THE PORTION OF THE | | LEVEL OF DISCHARGE USED FOR INTERIOR EXIT DISCHARGE | | SHALL BE PROTECTED BY AN APPROVED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER | | SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.7 AND SHALL BE | | SEPARATED FROM THE NONSPRINKLERED PORTION OF THE FLOOR | | BY FIRE BARRIERS WITH A FIRE RESISTANCE RATING MEETING | | THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ENCLOSURE OF EXITS. (SEE | | 7.1.3.2.1.) | | (B) THE INTERIOR EXIT DISCHARGE AREA SHALL BE IN A | | VESTIBULE OR FOYER THAT MEETS ALL OF THE FOLLOWING | | CRITERIA: | | I. THE DEPTH FROM THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE | | NOT MORE THAN 10 FT (3050 MM), AND THE LENGTH SHALL BE | | NOT MORE THAN 30 FT (9.1 M). | | II. THE FOYER SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM THE REMAINDER OF | | THE LEVEL OF DISCHARGE BY CONSTRUCTION PROVIDING | | PROTECTION NOT LESS THAN THE EQUIVALENT OF WIRED GLASS | | IN STEEL FRAMES OR 45 MINUTES FIRERESISTIVE | | CONSTRUCTION. | | III. THE FOYER SHALL SERVE ONLY AS MEANS OF EGRESS AND | | SHALL INCLUDE AN EXIT DIRECTLY TO THE OUTSIDE. | | (5) THE ENTIRE AREA ON THE LEVEL OF DISCHARGE SHALL BE | | SEPARATED FROM AREAS BELOW BY CONSTRUCTION HAVING A | | FIRE RESISTANCE RATING NOT LESS THAN THAT REQUIRED FOR | | THE EXIT ENCLOSURE, UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN | | 7.7.2(6). | | (6) LEVELS BELOW THE LEVEL OF DISCHARGE IN AN ATRIUM | | SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE OPEN TO THE LEVEL OF DISCHARGE | | WHERE SUCH LEVEL OF DISCHARGE IS PROTECTED IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH 8.6.7. | | | | 2) SHEET FA 1.01 - PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE INDICATING | | THAT THE FIRE ALARM WORK SHALL BE SUBMITTED AND | | COMPLETED UNDER SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS BY CERTIFIED | | LIFE SAFETY CONTRACTOR. | | | | 3) SHEET M 0.02 - DUCT DETECTORS ARE NOT CLEARLY | | INDICATED OR COULD BE EASILY LOCATED. PER NFPA CHAPTER | | 12, 12.5 BUILDING SERVICES. | | 12.5.1 UTILITIES. UTILITIES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE | | PROVISIONS OF SECTION 9.1. | | 12.5.2 HEATING, VENTILATING, AND AIR-CONDITIONING | | EQUIPMENT. HEATING, VENTILATING, AND AIR-CONDITIONING | | EQUIPMENT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION | | 9.2. | | | | 9.2 HEATING, VENTILATING, AND AIR-CONDITIONING. | | 9.2.1 AIR-CONDITIONING, HEATING, VENTILATING DUCTWORK, | | AND RELATED EQUIPMENT. AIR-CONDITIONING, HEATING, | | VENTILATING DUCTWORK, AND RELATED EQUIPMENT SHALL BE IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 90A, STANDARD FOR THE INSTALLATION | | OF AIR-CONDITIONING AND | | VENTILATING SYSTEMS, OR NFPA 90B, STANDARD FOR THE | | INSTALLATION OF WARM AIR HEATING AND AIR-CONDITIONING | | SYSTEMS, AS APPLICABLE, UNLESS SUCH INSTALLATIONS ARE | | APPROVED EXISTING INSTALLATIONS, WHICH SHALL BE | | PERMITTED TO BE CONTINUED IN SERVICE. | | | | PER NFPA 90 A , CHAPTER 6 CONTROLS | | 6.4* SMOKE DETECTION FOR AUTOMATIC CONTROL. | | 6.4.1 TESTING. ALL AUTOMATIC SHUTDOWN DEVICES SHALL BE | | TESTEDAT LEAST ANNUALLY. | | 6.4.2* LOCATION. | | 6.4.2.1 SMOKE DETECTORS LISTED FOR USE IN AIR | | DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS SHALL BE LOCATED AS FOLLOWS: | | (1) DOWNSTREAM OF THE AIR FILTERS AND AHEAD OF ANY | | BRANCH CONNECTIONS IN AIR SUPPLY SYSTEMS HAVING A | | CAPACITY GREATER THAN 944 L/SEC (2000 FT3/MIN) | | (2) AT EACH STORY PRIOR TO THE CONNECTION TO A COMMON | | RETURN AND PRIOR TO ANY RECIRCULATION OR FRESH AIR | | INLET CONNECTION IN AIR RETURN SYSTEMS HAVING A | | CAPACITY GREATER THAN 7080 L/SEC (15,000 FT3/MIN) AND | | SERVING MORE THAN ONE STORY | | | | 3) SHEET AE701 - THE DOOR & FRAME SCHEDULE DOES NOT | | INDICATE ANY DOOR HARDWARE SPECIFCALLY, EXIT DOOR | | HARDWARE AND PANIC DEVICES. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL | | HARDWARE DEVICES FOR EACH DOOR PER NFPA 101 CHAPTER 12, | | 12.2.2.2 DOORS | | 12.2.2.2.3 ANY DOOR IN A REQUIRED MEANS OF EGRESS FROM | | AN AREA HAVING AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 100 OR MORE PERSONS | | SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE PROVIDED WITH A LATCH OR LOCK | | ONLY IF THE LATCH OR LOCK IS PANIC HARDWARE OR FIRE | | EXIT HARDWARE COMPLYING WITH 7.2.1.7, UNLESS OTHERWISE | | PERMITTED BY ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: | | (1) THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL NOT APPLY TO DELAYED-EGRESS | | LOCKS AS PERMITTED IN 12.2.2.2.5. | | (2) THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL NOT APPLY TO | | ACCESS-CONTROLLED EGRESS DOORS AS PERMITTED IN | | 12.2.2.2.6. | | | | 4) SHEET AE 210 - THERE IS NO INDICATION OF A LIGHT | | WEIGHT ROOF AND/OR FLOOR SIGN PLEASE PROVIDE FOR A | | LIGHTWEIGHT SIGN PER FLORIDA 69A-60.0081; NOTICE | | SIGNAGE IS REQUIRED FOR STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME | | TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION. ANY COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, OR | | ANY MULTIUNIT RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OF THREE UNITS OR | | MORE WHICH USES HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL LIGHT-FRAME | | TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION IN ANY PORTION SHALL BE MARKED | | WITH A MALTESE CROSS SIGN MEASURING 8 INCHES | | HORIZONTALLY AND 8 INCHES VERTICALLY, OF A BRIGHT RED | | REFLECTIVE COLOR. THE APPROVED SYMBOL SHALL BE PLACED | | WITHIN 24 INCHES TO THE LEFT OF THE MAIN ENTRY DOOR. | | 1. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS ROOFS SHALL BE | | MARKED WITH THE LETTER "R". | | 2. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS FLOOR SYSTEMS | | SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE LETTER "F". | | 3. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS FLOOR AND ROOF | | SYSTEMS SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE LETTERS "R/F". | | | | 5) SHEET AE 112 - THERE IS NO INDICATION OF THE | | DIMENSIONS OF CORRIDORS 130 AND 133. PLEASE PROVIE THE | | DIMENSIONS COMPLY WITH NFPA 101, CHAPTER 12, 12.2.3.8 | | MINIMUM CORRIDOR WIDTH. THE WIDTH OF ANY EXIT ACCESS | | CORRIDOR SERVING 50 OR MORE PERSONS SHALL BE NOT LESS | | THAN 44 IN. (1120 MM). | | | | PETER LEDUC | | FIRE MARSHAL | | 561-804-4709 | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-09-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2016-09-23 |
Time |
13:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2016-09-22 |
Time |
14:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-09-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2016-09-20 |
Time |
15:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2016-09-07 |
Time |
14:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-09-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2016-09-07 |
Time |
14:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2016-08-03 |
Time |
14:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-08-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2016-08-03 |
Time |
14:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2016-06-30 |
Time |
10:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-06-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
vperez |
Date |
2016-06-29 |
Time |
16:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
cpuell |
Date |
2016-06-23 |
Time |
14:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-09-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-22 |
Time |
17:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-22 |
Time |
17:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-09-22 17:36:08 | MU 2016 023888 0000 |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-08-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-08-16 |
Time |
08:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-08-16 |
Time |
08:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-08-16 08:14:10 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | 561-805-6724 | | | | 1. IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT BY PALM BEACH COUNTY IS | | REQUIRED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. THE PLANS ARE TO BE | | STAMPED AND THE RECEIPT SHOWING THAT ALL FEES DUE HAVE | | BEEN PAID IS TO BE PROVIDED. 561-233-5025 FOR MORE | | INFORMATION. | | | | THIS MAY BE DONE AT THE END OF PLAN REVIEW, BUT IS | | REQUIRED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE. AFTER PALM | | BEACH COUNTY IMPACT FEE IS COMPLETE, THE STAMPED PLANS | | AND RECEIPT ARE TO BE RESUBMITTED AT THE BUILDING | | DIVISION COUNTER. THIS IS A PLAN REVIEW WHICH MAY TAKE | | UP TO THREE BUSINESS DAYS. IF PROJECT IS TIME | | SENSITIVE, PLEASE CONSIDER HAVING IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT | | AND PAYMENT COMPLETE PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING TO AVOID THE | | ADDITIONAL WEEK DELAY AT THE END OF PLAN REVIEW. | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-07-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-07-25 |
Time |
08:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-07-25 |
Time |
08:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-07-25 08:09:08 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | 561-805-6724 | | | | 1. IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT BY PALM BEACH COUNTY IS | | REQUIRED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. THE PLANS ARE TO BE | | STAMPED AND THE RECEIPT SHOWING THAT ALL FEES DUE HAVE | | BEEN PAID IS TO BE PROVIDED. 561-233-5025 FOR MORE | | INFORMATION. | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-05-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-05-27 |
Time |
10:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-05-27 |
Time |
10:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-05-27 10:54:41 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | 561-805-6724 | | | | 1. IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT BY PALM BEACH COUNTY IS | | REQUIRED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. THE PLANS ARE TO BE | | STAMPED AND THE RECEIPT SHOWING THAT ALL FEES DUE HAVE | | BEEN PAID IS TO BE PROVIDED. 561-233-5025 FOR MORE | | INFORMATION. | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-09-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2016-09-19 |
Time |
10:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2016-09-19 |
Time |
10:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-08-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2016-08-15 |
Time |
11:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2016-08-15 |
Time |
08:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-08-15 11:57:03 | 3RD REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL | | PERMIT #16050249 | | 8/15/16 | | | | 1) THE ENERGY/GAUGE SUBMITTAL INDICATES AHU-5 TO HAVE A | | CAPACITY OF 284 MBH HOWEVER THE AC SCHEDULE INDICATES | | 316 MBH- PLEASE CORRECT ONE OR THE OTHER. | | | | 2) THE AC SYSTEMS APPEAR TO BE OVERSIZED AND NOT IN | | COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION C403.2.2 FBC-14 ENERGY | | CONSERVATION. THE AC CALCULATIONS INDICATE A TOTAL HEAT | | LOAD OF 62.8 TON HOWEVER THE SCHEDULE INDICATES 75 TONS | | OF COOLING. THE CALCULATIONS INDICATE A HEATING COIL | | REQUIREMENT OF 76 KW, HOWEVER THE SCHEDULE INDICATES 95 | | KW ELECTRIC HEAT SELECTED- SEE SECTION C403.2.2 FBC-14 | | ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | 3) THE ZONE LOCATIONS INDICATED IN THE AC CALCULATIONS- | | EAST, WEST, CENTRAL, LOCKERS, STR COND DO NOT MATCH THE | | AHU LOCATIONS SHOW IN THE SCHEDULE- SOUTH, STRENGTH, | | NORTH, HOSPITALITY, & SOUTH O/A. PLEASE CORRELATE THE | | CALCS WITH THE SYSTEMS AND THE PLANS. | | | | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6719 | | [email protected] | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-07-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2016-07-12 |
Time |
09:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2016-07-11 |
Time |
16:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-07-12 09:17:25 | 2ND REVIEW: FBC 2014 MECHANICAL | | PERMIT #16050249 | | 7/12/16 | | | | 1) SHEETS M0.02 & M1.01: EF-1 HAS A CAPACITY OF 1075 | | CFMS, HOWEVER THE PLAN INDICATES A TOTAL OF 1150 CFMS | | REQUIRED. | | | | 2) M0.02 & M1.01: EF-10 HAS A CAPACITY OF 100 CFRMS, | | HOWEVER THE PLAN INDICATES A TOTAL OF 200 CFMS | | REQUIRED. | | | | 3) M0.02 & M1.01: AHU-5 HAS A TOTAL SUPPLY AND O/A | | CAPACITY OF 3100 CFMS, HOWEVER THE PLAN IS INDICATING A | | LESSER AMOUNT OF 2815 CFMS OF AIR BEING SUPPLIED. AS | | THIS UNIT IS PROVIDING 100 % AIR FOR EXHAUST, PLEASE | | REVIEW THE PLAN FOR ANY POSSIBLE SUPPLY DIFFUSER | | OMISSIONS. | | | | 4) M0.02 & M1.01, AHU-5 O/A SCHEDULE SHOWS 520 CFMS OF | | EXHAUST AIR FOR THE WOMEN'S LOCKER/SHOWER ROOM, HOWEVER | | THE PLAN IS INDICATING A LESSER AMOUNT OF 450 CFMS. | | | | 5) THE AC COOLING AND HEATING CALCULATIONS, AND THE | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE NOT RESUBMITTED WITH THE | | CORRECTED PLANS. | | | | 6) AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED IN 1ST REVIEW COMMENT #4B, | | PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS OR NOTES ON THE PLAN INDICATING | | COMPLIANCE FOR O/A INTAKE AND EXHAUST TERMINATION | | LOCATION CLEARANCES- SEE SECTIONS 401.4 & 501.3.1. | | | | 7) IN REFERENCE TO 1ST REVIEW COMMENT #5, CLARIFY IF | | THE AIR HANDLERS WILL BE LINKED TOGETHER FOR FAN | | SHUTDOWN IF ANY SINGLE DUCT SMOKE DETECTOR ACTIVATES. | | | | 8) AS PREVIOUSLY REQUESTRED IN 1ST REVIEW COMMENT #8B, | | PROVIDE MAKEUP AIR FOR THE DRYERS. THE RESPONSE FROM | | JLRD REFERENCES THE AHU-5 TABLE HOWEVER AHU-5 IS NOT | | SERVING THE LAUNDRY ROOM. | | | | 9) ADVISORY: IN REFERENCE TO JLRD RESPONSE TO 1ST | | REVIEW COMMENT #10, A SPECIALTY ENGINEER WILL PROVIDE | | THE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA FOR THE EXTERIOR MECHANICAL | | EQUIPMENT INSTALLATIONS. PLEASE NOTE TRHAT A HOLD WILL | | BE PLACED ON MECHANICAL INSPECTIONS UNTIL THE | | ENGINEERING IS SUBMITTED AND APPROVED. | | | | 10) M1.01, M1.02, & M1.03: PLEASE SHOW THE REQUIRED | | ACCESS PANELS ON THE PLANS FOR ALL ABOVE CEILING | | EXHAUST FANS- SECTION 306.1. | | | | 11) M1.01, M1.02, & M1.03: SHOW THE REQUIRED SMOKE | | DAMPERS FOR DUCT PENETRATING SMOKE WALLS AT CORRIDORS | | 132 & 200- SECTION 607.5.4. | | | | 12) M3.03: PROVIDE A SMOKE DAMPER DETAIL AND INDICATE | | WHERE THE FIRE DAMPERS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN SHEET CAN BE | | FOUND ON THE HVAC FLOOR PLANS. | | | | 13) REFER TO SECTION C403.2.7.2 FBC-14 ENERGY | | CONSERVATION AND PROVIDE NON-COMBUSTIBLE DOORS FOR ALL | | MECHANICAL CLOSETS, UNLESS THE RETURN DUCTS ARE | | DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE AIR HANDLERS. | | | | 14) ADVISORY: JLRD HAS REQUESTED DEFFERRED SUBMITTALS | | FOR PRODUCTS INCLUDING O/A INTAKE AND EXHAUST LOUVERS, | | AND DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS. PLEASE REVIEW THE FOLLOWING | | SECTIONS FOR THE WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC: | | | | DEFERRED SUBMITTAL: 107.3.4.2 DEFERRED SUBMITTALS. FOR | | THE PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ARE | | DEFINED AS THOSE PORTIONS OF THE DESIGN THAT ARE NOT | | SUBMITTED AT THE TIME OF THE | | APPLICATION AND THAT ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE | | BUILDING OFFICIAL WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD. DEFERRAL | | OF ANY SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL HAVE THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF | | THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. THE REGISTERED DESIGN | | PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE SHALL LIST THE | | DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ON THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR | | REVIEW BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | | DOCUMENTS FOR DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE | | SUBMITTED TO THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN | | RESPONSIBLE CHARGE WHO SHALL REVIEW THEM AND FORWARD | | THEM TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITH A NOTATION | | INDICATING THAT THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE | | BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO | | THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL | | ITEMS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THE DEFERRED | | SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING | | OFFICIAL. | | | | DEFERRED SUBMITTAL. 2010 FBC 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT | | APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE | | DCA RULE 9N-03 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN | | WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL | | FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6719 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-05-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2016-05-17 |
Time |
06:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2016-05-17 |
Time |
06:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-05-17 08:08:41 | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2014 MECHANICAL | | PERMIT #16050249 | | 5/17/16 | | | | 1) PROVIDE EXHAUST VENTILATION CALCULATIONS FOR THE | | LOCKER ROOMS AND BATH ROOMS, AND PROVIDE HVAC CONTROL | | SEQUENCING DETAILS- SEE TABLE 403.3 FBC-14 MECHANICAL | | AND ASHRAE 62.1-2010. | | | | 2) SHEET M0.02: REFER TO TABLE D-1 ASHRAE 90.1 AND | | CORRECT THE DRY AND WET BULB TEMPERATURES FOR WEST PALM | | BEACH SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND IN THE AC CALCULATIONS. | | | | 3) SUBMIT A 2ND SET OF ENERGY AND AC CALCULATIONS, AND | | COMPLETE THE MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST ON PAGE | | 11 OF THE ENERGY SUBMITTAL. | | | | 4) SHEETS M1.01, M1.02, & M1.03: PLEASE LABEL THE O/A | | INTAKES A) PROVIDE SHUTOFF DAMPER CONTROLS FOR THE O/A | | AND EXHAUST DUCTS.- SECTION C403.2.4.4 FBC-14 ENERGY | | CONSERVATION. B) VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 401.4 | | AND 501.3.1 FBC-14 MECHANICAL - REQUIRED CLEARANCES FOR | | O/A INTAKES AND EXHAUST OUTLETS. C) INDICATE HOW THE | | O/A INLET AND EXHAUST OUTLET OPENINGS WILL PROTECTED IN | | COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 401.5 AND 501.3.2 , AND | | PROVIDE SUBMITTALS APPROVED WITH SIGNATURE BY THE | | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. | | | | 5) M1.01, M1.02, M1.03: PROVIDE DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS IN | | THE RETURN AIR SYSTEMS OF ALL SYSTEMS RETURNING OVER | | 2000 CFM'S- SECTION 606.2.1. INDICATE CONTROLS | | OPERATION AND SUPERVISION OF THE DETECTORS, AND PROVIDE | | A SUBMITTAL APPROVED WITH SIGNATURE BY THE DESIGN | | PROFESSIONAL, | | | | 6) M1.01 & M1.02: AHU-4 SHALL NOT SUPPLY AIR TO STAIR | | #1- REFER TO SECTION 1022.6 FBC-14 BUILDING: THE | | INTERIOR EXIT STAIRWAY AND RAMP VENTILATION SYSTEMS | | SHALL BE INDEPENDENT OF OTHER BUILDING VENTILATION | | SYSTEMS. | | | | 7) M1.01: PROVIDE AN INDEPENDENT EXHAUST SYSTEM FOR THE | | JANITOR ROOM- SECTION 501.2. | | | | 8) M1.01, LAUNDRY ROOM: SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S | | SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE DRYERS WITH APPROVAL SIGNATURE | | BY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL- REFER TO SECTION 504.7 AND | | REVISE THE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE. | | 504.7 COMMERCIAL CLOTHES DRYERS. | | THE INSTALLATION OF DRYER EXHAUST DUCTS SERVING | | COMMERCIAL CLOTHES DRYERS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE | | APPLIANCE MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. | | EXHAUST FAN MOTORS INSTALLED IN EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL | | BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE AIRSTREAM. IN MULTIPLE | | INSTALLATIONS, THE FAN SHALL OPERATE CONTINUOUSLY OR BE | | INTERLOCKED TO OPERATE WHEN ANY INDIVIDUAL UNIT IS | | OPERATING. DUCTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM CLEARANCE OF 6 | | INCHES (152 MM) TO COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS. CLOTHES DRYER | | TRANSITION DUCTS USED TO CONNECT THE APPLIANCE TO THE | | EXHAUST DUCT SYSTEM SHALL BE LIMITED TO SINGLE LENGTHS | | NOT TO EXCEED 8 FEET (2438 MM) IN LENGTH AND SHALL BE | | LISTED AND LABELED FOR THE APPLICATION. TRANSITION | | DUCTS SHALL NOT BE CONCEALED WITHIN CONSTRUCTION. | | A) INDICATE THE GAGE OF THE DRYER EXHAUST DUCT. B) | | INDICATE HOW MAKE-UP MAIR IS BEING RPOVIDE AND PROVIDE | | A CALCULATION. | | | | 9) M1.03: THE LABEL FOR AHU-4 IS MISSING. | | | | 10) M3.01: PROVIDE THE WIND LOAD DESIGN CRITERIA ON THE | | PLAN- SECTION 301.15 FBC-14 MECHANICAL. | | | | 11) INDICATE HOW ACC/AHU-6 WAS SIZED- PROVIDE A | | CALCULATION. | | | | 12) M0.02: A) PROVIDE THE CORRECT SPELLING FOR | | "CONDENSER" IN THE SCHEDULE. B) PROVIDE THE EFFICIENCY | | RATINGS FOR THE ACC SYSTEMS 1-5 IN THE SCHEDULE. | | | | 13) PROVIDE CONDENSATE DISPOSAL PLANS FOR ALL SYSTEMS- | | SECTION 307. | | | | 14) REFER TO SECTION C403.2.7.2 FBC-14 ENERGY | | CONSERVATION AND PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS AND | | MATERIALS COMPLIANCE FOR THE MECHANICAL CLOSETS. | | | | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6719 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-09-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-09-08 |
Time |
05:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-09-08 |
Time |
04:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-08-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-08-29 |
Time |
06:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-08-27 |
Time |
09:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-08-29 06:16:16 | 1) SUBMIT A CONDENSATE RISER FOR REVIEW.SHT. P3.03 HAS | | BEEN REVISED TO SHOW THE HUB DRAINS, NOT THE CONDENSATE | | DRAINS AS HAS BEEN REQUESTED 2 PREVIOUS TIMES.SUBMIT A | | CONDENSATE RISER SHOWING THE SIZE OF THE CONDENSATE | | DRAINS AND THE EQUIPMENT CAPACITY OF THE DRAINS IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH 2014 FPC TABLE 314.2.2. | | 2) WHAT WILL THE SINK IN CONFERENCE ROOM #134 BE USED | | FOR THAT IT WOULD NOT HAVE TO COMPLY WITH FPC | | SEC.607.1? | | 3) THE FAUCETS IN BREAKROOM #110 AND PANTRY #118 SHALL | | BE EQUIPPED WITH A WATER TEMPERATURE LIMITING DEVICE | | THAT CONFORMS TO ASSE 1070 AND SHALL LIMIT THE TEMPERED | | WATER TO A MAXIMUM OF 110 DEGREES FARRENHEIT.THIS WILL | | ALSO APPLY TO THE CONFERENCE ROOM SINK IF DETERMINED | | THAT IT NEEDS TEMPERED WATER. | | 4) PLEASE IDENTIFY THE CONTINUATION LINES ON THE WATER | | RISER BY IDENTIFICATION TAGS EITHER BY LETTERS OR | | NUMBERS. | | | | TIM LARGE | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6692 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-07-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2016-07-27 |
Time |
11:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2016-07-27 |
Time |
11:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-07-27 11:30:11 | 2ND REVIEW | | | | | | | | GEORGE JOHNSON | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER LL | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | | BUILDING DIVISION | | 561-805-6711 | | [email protected] | | | | | | PLUMBING COMMENTS: | | | | 1. SHOW DIMENSION OF WATER CLOSET OF SIDE WALL. PER FBC | | ACC 604.2 LOCATION. | | THE WATER CLOSET SHALL BE POSITIONED WITH A WALL OR | | PARTITION TO THE REAR AND TO ONE SIDE. THE CENTERLINE | | OF THE WATER CLOSET SHALL BE 16 INCHES (405 MM) MINIMUM | | TO 18 INCHES (455 MM) MAXIMUM FROM THE SIDE WALL OR | | PARTITION, EXCEPT THAT THE WATER CLOSET SHALL BE 17 | | INCHES (430 MM) MINIMUM AND 19 INCHES (485 MM) MAXIMUM | | FROM THE SIDE WALL OR PARTITION IN THE AMBULATORY | | ACCESSIBLE TOILET COMPARTMENT SPECIFIED IN 604.8.2. | | WATER CLOSETS SHALL BE ARRANGED FOR A LEFT-HAND OR | | RIGHT-HAND APPROACH. | | | | 2. SHOW CLEARANCE AROUND WATER CLOSET TO COMPLY WITH | | FBC ACC 604.3.1 SIZE. | | CLEARANCE AROUND A WATER CLOSET SHALL BE 60 INCHES | | (1525 MM) MINIMUM MEASURED PERPENDICULAR FROM THE SIDE | | WALL AND 56 INCHES (1420 MM) MINIMUM MEASURED | | PERPENDICULAR FROM THE REAR WALL. | | | | | | 3. PREVIOUS COMMENT 16) SHT. P0.03 - SUBMIT | | MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE OIL GUARD SUMP | | PUMP SYSTEM. FPC SEC.1003.4 - EXCEPTION. THE DETAIL YOU | | PROVIDED ON P0.03 IS NOT WHAT WE ARE LOOKING FOR. WE | | WANT THE SPECIFICATION SHEETS FROM THE SPECIFIC | | MANUFACTURE FOR THE PUMP AND OIL GUARD SYSTEM. PER WPB | | AMEND. TO FBC 107.2.1 | | | | 4. PREVIOUS COMMENT 17) SHT.P0.03 - CONDENSATE BOX | | DETAIL - HOW WILL THE POSSIBILITY OF WATER SPILLAGE BE | | CONTROLLED WITH THIS DEVICE? CLARIFY. THIS DETAIL DOES | | NOT SHOW US HOW SPILLAGE WILL BE CONTROLLED. PLEASE | | CLARIFY PER WPB AMEND. TO FBC 107.2.1 | | | | 5. PREVIOUS COMMENT 18) SUBMIT A CONDENSATE RISER FOR | | REVIEW. SHOW THE TERMINATION POINT OF THE CONDENSATE | | DRAINS. FBC 107.1. YOU RESPONDED THAT A RISER WAS ADDED | | BUT COULD NOT FIND IT PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | 6. SHT. P0.03 DETAIL FOR WATER HEATER. THE RETURN LINE | | OF THE RECIRCULATION SYSTEM SHALL SHOW THAT IT CONNECTS | | TO BOTH THE COLD INLET OF THE WATER HEATER AND THE COLD | | WATER INLET OF THE THERMOSTATIC MIXING VALVE . PER FBC | | PL SEC. 607.2.2 | | | | 7. SHT. P1.04+P3.03 SNK 1+2 SHALL BE PROVIDE WITH HOT | | OR TEMPERED WATER. PER FBC PL 607.1 | | | | 8. SHT. P3.02 SHOW WATER HAMMER ARRESTOR ON ICE | | MACHINE. PER FBC PL 604.9 | | | | 9. PLEASE SHOW FLOW ARROWS ON HOT WATER RETURN SYSTEM . | | PER WPB AMEND TO FBC 107.2.1 | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-05-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-05-19 |
Time |
06:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-05-17 |
Time |
04:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-05-17 15:20:15 | 1) SUBMIT THE OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THE A-3 OCCUPANCY AND | | ALSO FOR THE B OCCUPANCY.FBC 1004.1. | | 2) SHT. AE 410 - SHOW THE REQUIRED CLEAR FLOOR SPACE | | FOR THE BREAK ROOM SINK. 2014 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY | | SEC.606.2. | | 3) SHT. AE 401 - CLEARLY SHOW THE INSIDE CLEAR | | DIMENSIONS OF THE ACCESSIBLE SHOWERS. TRANSFER SHOWERS | | SHALL BE 36 INCHES BY 36 INCHES CLEAR INSIDE DIMENSIONS | | PER 2014 FAC SEC.608.2.1. | | 4) SHT.AE 403 - TOILET ACCESSORY LEGEND - NOTE # 4 | | REFERS TO CHAPTER 11 SEC. 4.1.3 OF ADA. REVISE NOTE TO | | READ 2014 FBC-ACCESSIBILITY. THERE IS NO CHAPTER 11 | | SEC. 4.1.3. IN THE 2014 FL. ACCESS. CODE. | | 5) SHT. AE 911 - THE GRAB BARS SHALL BE MEASURED TO THE | | TOP OF THE GRIPPING SURFACE, NOT TO THE CENTER AS | | SHOWN. 2014 FAC SEC. 609.4. | | 6) INDICATE THE ACCESSIBLE URINAL IN EACH MEN'S | | RESTROOM ON THE FLOOR PLANS AND ON THE ELEVATION | | DRAWINGS. SHOW THE REQUIRED CLEAR FLOOR SPACE ON THE | | PLANS. COMPLY WITH 2014 FAC SEC.605.1 THRU 605.4. | | 7) SHOW THE INSIDE CLEAR DIMENSIONS (LXW) OF ALL | | ACCESSIBLE TOILET COMPARTMENTS AND TOILET ROOMS ON THE | | PLAN. FBC 107.2.1. | | 8) SHOW THE LENGTH AND WIDTH OF THE STANDARD TOILET | | STALLS ON THE PLAN. COMPLY WITH 2014 FPC SEC. 405.3.1. | | 9) AT LEAST ONE LAVATORY LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE TOILET | | COMPARTMENT IN THE RESTROOMS SHALL COMPLY WITH FAC | | SEC.213.3.4. | | 10) SHT. AE 911 - THE TOP OF THE SHOWER SEAT SHALL BE A | | MAXIMUM OF 19 INCHES ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR.FAC | | SEC.610.3. | | 11) SHT. AE 911 - THE MAXIMUM SPOUT HEIGHT OF THE | | DRINKING FOUNTAIN FOR PERSONS IN A WHEELCHAIR SHALL BE | | A MAXIMUM OF 36 INCHES. THE SPOUT HEIGHT OF THE | | DRINKING FOUNTAIN FOR STANDING PERSONS SHALL BE 38 | | INCHES MINIMUM AND 43 INCHES MAXIMUM ABOVE THE FINISH | | FLOOR. FAC SECS.602.5 AND 602.7. | | 12) SHOW THE REQUIRED TURNING SPACE IN THE TOILET ROOMS | | & TOILET COMPARTMENTS.FAC SEC. 304. | | 13) SHT. AE 801 - DETAIL #6 - SHOW THE REQUIRED KNEE | | AND TOE CLEARANCES PER THE FAC SEC.306. | | 14) SHT. AE 911 - THE TOILET PAPER DISPENSER SHALL BE | | LOCATED 7"- 9" MAXIMUM IN FRONT OF THE WATER CLOEST TO | | THE CENTERLINE OF THE DISPENSER PER FAC SEC. 604.7. | | 15) THE SHOWER CONTROLS SHALL BE LOCATED A MAXIMUM 15 | | INCHES FROM THE CENTERLINE OF THE SEAT TOWARD THE | | SHOWER OPENING.INDICATE THIS ON THE PLAN. FAC | | SEC.608.5.1. | | 16) SHT. P0.03 - SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS | | FOR THE OIL GUARD SUMP PUMP SYSTEM. FPC SEC.1003.4 - | | EXCEPTION. | | 17) SHT.P0.03 - CONDENSATE BOX DETAIL - HOW WILL THE | | POSSIBILITY OF WATER SPILLAGE BE CONTROLLED WITH THIS | | DEVICE? CLARIFY. | | 18) SUBMIT A CONDENSATE RISER FOR REVIEW. SHOW THE | | TERMINATION POINT OF THE CONDENSATE DRAINS. FBC 107.1. | | 19)SHT. P0.03 - WATER HEATER DETAIL SHOWS THE WATER | | HEATERS AS BEING BOTTOM FED & THE WATER RISER ON SHT. | | P3.03 SHOWS THE WATER HEATERS AS TOP FED. CLARIFY. | | BOTTOM FED WATER HEATERS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A | | VACUUM RELIEF ON THE CCOLD WATER SUPPLY PER FPC | | SEC.504.2. | | 20) SHT. P0.03 - WATER HEATER DETAIL - THE HOT WATER | | RETURN LINE SHALL ALSO CONNECT TO THE COLD WATER INLET | | TO THE WATER HEATERS. THE FLOW ARROW ON THE DETAIL DOES | | NOT SEEM TO MEET THE INTENT OF FPC 607.2.1. | | 21) SHT.P3.04 - INDICATE THE SLOPE OF THE HORIZONTAL | | STORM DRAIN PIPING. SIZING SHALL COMPLY WITH FPC TABLE | | 1106.3. THE DESIGN OF THE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM SHALL | | INCLUDE 1/2 THE AREA OF ANY VERTICAL WALL THAT DIVERTS | | RAINWATER TO THE ROOF. SUBMIT CALCULATIONS. | | 22) SHT. P3.04 - RISER 3 ST - SIZE THE HORIZONTAL LINE | | DRAINING 2480 SQ. FT., 6115 SQ. FT., & 1835 SQ. FT. THE | | STORM DRAIN SYSTEM SHALL BE SIZED ON A RAINFALL RATE OF | | 5 INCHES PER HOUR. | | 23) SHT. P3.04 - RISER 2 ST - THE 6" LINE DRAINING 5185 | | SQ. FT. MAY BE UNDERSIZED.INDICATE THE PIPE SLOPE AND | | COMPLY WITH FPC TABLE 1106.3. | | 24) A BACKFLOW PREVENTER IS REQUIRED ON THE WATER | | SUPPLY TO THE REFRIGERATOR FOR THE ICE MAKER AND A | | WATER HAMMER ARRESTOR IS REQUIRED BECAUSE IT IS A QUICK | | CLOSING VALVE. FPC SEC.608.3. | | 25) SHT. P3.01 - SIZE ALL SECTIONS OF THE VENTS AND THE | | WASTE STACKS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS SECTIONS THAT ARE NOT | | SIZED. FBC 107.2.1. | | 26) SHT. P3.01 - THE SH-2 SHOWERS IN MEN'S RESTROOM | | 158B & 159B AS DRAWN ON THE RISER CREATE A PLUMBING | | CODE VIOLATION FOR FIXTURES PERMITTED ON A WET VENT. | | EITHER INDIVIDUALLY VENT EACH SHOWER OR CONNECT BOTH | | SHOWERS TO THE STACK.FPC SEC. 912. | | 27) THE SHOWERS IN ROOMS 148B & 153B AS DRAWN ON THE | | RISER CREATE A PLUMBING CODE VIOLATION OF FPC SEC. 912 | | FOR THE NUMBER AND TYPE OF FIXTURE PERMITTED ON A WET | | VENT. | | 28) THE VENT FOR THE MOP SINK AND THE FLOOR DRAIN SHALL | | BE LOCATED BETWWEEN THE TWO FIXTURES. FPC SECS.901.2, | | 901.2.1. | | 29) SHT. P3.01 - THE VENT FOR THE STATIONARY WHIRLPOOLS | | SHALL BE LOCATED BETWEEN THE TWO DRAINS. FPC SECS. | | 901.2, 901.2.1. | | 30) CLEANOUTS ARE REQUIRED IN THE BASE OF EACH SOIL OR | | WASTE STACK. FPC SEC.708.3.4. | | 31) INDICATE THE SLOPE OF THE BUILDING DRAIN AND | | BRANCHES ON THE PLANS. COMPLY WITH FPC SEC.710 AND | | TABLE 710.1 (1). | | 32) THE WASHERS AND DRYERS SHALL COMPLY WITH | | FBC-ACCESSIBILITY SEC.611. | | 33) SIZE ALL SECTIONS OF THE WATER RISER.FBC 107.2.1. | | 34) SHOW THE HOT WATER RECIRCULATING LINE ON SHEET | | P3.02. | | 35) SHT.P1.01 & P1.03 - RESTROOMS #155A & 156A - THE | | RESTROOMS ARE MISLABELED. THE MEN'S IS SHOWN AS THE | | WOMEN'S AND THE WOMEN'S IS SHOWN AS THE MEN'S. PLEASE | | CORRECT. | | 36) INDICATE THE ACCESSIBLE URINAL IN EACH MEN'S | | RESTROOM ON THE FLOOR PLANS AND ON THE ELEVATION | | DRAWINGS. SHOW THE REQUIRED CLEAR FLOOR SPACE ON THE | | PLANS. COMPLY WITH 2014 FAC SEC.605.1 THRU 605.4. | | 37) URINAL PARTITIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH 2014 FBC | | SEC.1210.3.2. | | 38) SUBMIT A DESIGN DETAIL FOR THE LINT TRAP / | | INTERCEPTOR. COMPLY WITH 2014 FPC SEC.1003.6. | | 39) SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION SPECIFICATIONS | | FOR THE WHIRLPOOL TUBS. FBC 107.1. | | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | TIM LARGE | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | 561-805-6692 | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-09-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-16 |
Time |
10:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-16 |
Time |
10:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-09-16 10:17:38 | NO ROOF INFORMATION SUBMITTED | | THIS IS TO BE SUBMITTED AS A REVISION PRIOR TO | | INSTALLATION. THE PRODUCT APPROVAL, REVIEWED BY | | DESIGNER OF RECORD, IS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE | | ASSEMBLY PROPOSED INDICATED. ENGINEERING FOR ENHANCED | | FASTENING TO BE SUBMITTED IF APPLICABLE. | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-08-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-08-15 |
Time |
17:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-08-15 |
Time |
17:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-08-15 17:37:33 | NO ROOFING INFORMATION PROVIDED IF ROOFING INFORMATION | | (PRODUCT APPROVAL REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD, | | ASSEMBLY PROPOSED, ENHANCED FASTENING CALCULATIONS IF | | REQUIRED) IS NOT SUBMITTED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, | | THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO. ROOF | | INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED | | AND APPROVED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. |
|
|
Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-07-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-07-25 |
Time |
08:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-07-25 |
Time |
08:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-07-25 08:09:47 | NO ROOFING INFORMATION PROVIDED | | IF ROOFING INFORMATION (PRODUCT APPROVAL REVIEWED BY | | DESIGNER OF RECORD, ASSEMBLY PROPOSED, ENHANCED | | FASTENING CALCULATIONS IF REQUIRED) IS NOT SUBMITTED | | PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, THIS INFORMATION WILL BE | | REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR | | TO INSTALLATION | | | | MODIFIED | | METAL BARREL TILE | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-06-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-06-03 |
Time |
12:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-06-03 |
Time |
12:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-06-03 12:10:38 | NO ROOFING INFORMATION PROVIDED | | IF ROOFING INFORMATION (PRODUCT APPROVAL REVIEWED BY | | DESIGNER OF RECORD, ASSEMBLY PROPOSED, ENHANCED | | FASTENING CALCULATIONS IF REQUIRED) IS NOT SUBMITTED | | PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE, THIS INFORMATION WILL BE | | REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR | | TO INSTALLATION | | | | MODIFIED | | METAL BARREL TILE | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
THRESHOLD |
THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-09-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-19 |
Time |
16:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-19 |
Time |
16:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
THRESHOLD |
THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-09-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-19 |
Time |
07:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-09-16 |
Time |
08:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-09-16 08:59:25 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | 561-805-6724 | | | | GOVERNING CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (FBC 2014) | | 4TH SUBMITTAL, THRESHOLD DOCUMENTS FIRST REVIEW | | PLEASE NOTE THAT THRESHOLD DOCUMENTS REQUIRE A PLAN | | REVIEW AND THE PERMIT CANNOT BE ISSUED UNTIL APPROVED | | BY KEN CONRAD. | | | | YOU MAY PROVIDE ONLY THE CORRECTED PAGES (RATHER THAN | | THE ENTIRE AGREEMENT). THE DOCUMENTS MAY BE SENT VIA | | EMAIL TO [email protected] FOR PRELIMINARY REVIEW PRIOR TO | | PLAN RESUBMITTAL. IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS | | PROJECT IS TIME SENSITIVE. PLEASE SEND DOCUMENTS AS | | SOON AS POSSIBLE. ALTHOUGH IT IS PREFERABLE THAT THEY | | BE SUBMITTED ALL AT ONCE, TO AVOID FURTHER DELAYS | | PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTS AS THEY ARE AVAILABLE. | | | | 1. FLORIDA STATUTE 553.71 | | | | A. NA | | | | B. CONTRACTOR (DALE HEDRICK, QUALIFIER) IS TO SIGN THE | | THRESHOLD AGREEMENT. | | | | C. PER KEN CONRAD, THE CONTRACTOR AND INSPECTOR HAS | | BEEN APPROVED. HOWEVER, IT IS RECOMMENDED TO ADD AN | | ADDITIONAL INSPECTOR TO THE AGREEMENT. ONLY LICENSED | | INSPECTORS WHO HAVE SUBMITTED A RESUME AND SIGNED THE | | SI AGREEMENT MAY PERFORM INSPECTIONS ON THIS THRESHOLD | | STRUCTURE. APPROVAL OF AN ADDITIONAL INSPECTOR WILL NOT | | DELAY PERMIT ISSUANCE. | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
THRESHOLD |
THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-08-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-08-16 |
Time |
08:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-08-16 |
Time |
08:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-08-16 08:25:11 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | [email protected] | | 561-805-6724 | | | | GOVERNING CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (FBC 2014) | | 3RD SUBMITTAL, THRESHOLD DOCUMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN | | PROVIDED. | | PLEASE NOTE THAT THRESHOLD DOCUMENTS REQUIRE A PLAN | | REVIEW AND THE PERMIT CANNOT BE ISSUED UNTIL APPROVED | | BY KEN CONRAD. THE DOCUMENTS MAY BE SENT VIA EMAIL TO | | [email protected] FOR PRELIMINARY REVIEW PRIOR TO PLAN | | RESUBMITTAL. IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS PROJECT | | IS TIME SENSITIVE. PLEASE SEND DOCUMENTS AS SOON AS | | POSSIBLE. ALTHOUGH IT IS PREFERABLE THAT THEY BE | | SUBMITTED ALL AT ONCE, TO AVOID FURTHER DELAYS PLEASE | | PROVIDE DOCUMENTS AS THEY ARE AVAILABLE. | | | | 1. FLORIDA STATUTE 553.71, IT APPEARS THAT THIS | | BUILDING MAY QUALIFY AS A THRESHOLD BUILDING; ANY | | BUILDING WHICH IS GREATER THAN (3) STORIES OR 50 FT. IN | | HEIGHT, OR WHICH HAS AN ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY | | CLASSIFICATION AS DEFINED IN THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | WHICH EXCEEDS 5,000 SF IN AREA AND AN OCCUPANT CONTENT | | OF GREATER THAN 500 PERSONS. | | | | 2. AS A THRESHOLD BUILDING, THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: | | | | A. THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN; FS 553.79(5)(A), CITY OF | | WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING | | CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION 109.3.6.1. THE | | ENFORCING AGENCY SHALL REQUIRE A SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO | | PERFORM STRUCTURAL INSPECTIONS ON A THRESHOLD BUILDING | | PURSUANT TO A STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN PREPARED BY | | THE ENGINEER OR ARCHITECT OF RECORD. THE STRUCTURAL | | INSPECTION PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY | | THE ENFORCING AGENCY BEFORE THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING | | PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A THRESHOLD BUILDING. | | THE PURPOSE OF THE STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN IS TO | | PROVIDE SPECIFIC INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND SCHEDULES SO | | THAT THE BUILDING CAN BE ADEQUATELY INSPECTED FOR | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE PERMITTED DOCUMENTS. | | | | B. THRESHOLD INSPECTOR: WPB AMENDMENT 109.3.6.2 W.P.B. | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT REQUESTS FOR THRESHOLD | | BUILDINGS A SPECIAL INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY FS | | 553.79(5)(A) TO THE MINIMUM INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY | | THIS CODE. THE THRESHOLD INSPECTION FORMS ARE REQUIRED | | TO BE FILED OUT BY ALL PARTIES, NOTARIZED AND RETURNED | | TO THIS OFFICE, REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRIOR TO PERMIT | | ISSUANCE. CONTACT KEN CONRAD, MANAGER OF THE SPECIAL | | INSPECTOR PROGRAM, AT 561-805-6666 FOR ADDITIONAL | | INFORMATION. | | FORMS WERE SENT TO: [email protected] | | ON 5/28/16. | | | | C. SPECIAL INSPECTOR RESUME': PROVIDE A RESUME' OF | | INSPECTION EXPERIENCE ON PREVIOUS PROJECTS FOR REVIEW | | BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS DESIGNEE. AFTER THE | | RESUME' IS REVIEWED, AN INTERVIEW WILL BE SCHEDULED. | | UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL AN INSPECTOR BE INTERVIEWED | | FOR WORK WITHOUT FIRST MEETING THE ABOVE CRITERIA. THE | | RESUME' IS TO BE SUBMITTED TO KEN CONRAD (AND COPY | | SAMANTHA HILL), 561-805-6666, [email protected], | | [email protected] | | | | ALL PROSPECTIVE INSPECTORS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY THE | | CHIEF BUILDING INSPECTOR AND ALL ARE REQUIRED TO SIGN | | THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR AGREEMENT. | | | | D. CONTRACTOR RESUME': PROVIDE A JOB SUMMARY OR HISTORY | | FOR THIS TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED TO | | KEN CONRAD, (PLEASE COPY SAMANTHA HILL) VIA E-MAIL | | ([email protected], [email protected]). | | | | E. PERMIT DOCUMENTS: PAPER SUBMITTALS REQUIRE THREE | | SIGNED AND SEALED (IF APPLICABLE) ORIGINAL SETS OF ALL | | DOCUMENTS. | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
THRESHOLD |
THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-07-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-07-25 |
Time |
08:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-07-25 |
Time |
08:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-07-25 08:24:59 | SEE BUILDING COMMENTS | | TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD 761, A3 AND B OCCUPANCIES | | 2 STORIES, 28,188 SF 1ST STORY, 4,164 SF 2ND STORY. |
|
|
Review Stop |
THRESHOLD |
THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-05-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-05-28 |
Time |
16:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2016-05-28 |
Time |
16:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-05-28 16:18:23 | SEE BUILDING COMMENTS | | A TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD WAS NOT PROVIDED BUT IT APPEARS | | THAT IT EXCEEDS 500, A3 AND B OCCUPANCIES | | 2 STORIES, 28,188 SF 1ST STORY, 4,164 SF 2ND STORY. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-09-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2016-09-23 |
Time |
13:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2016-09-23 |
Time |
13:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-09-23 13:55:33 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW | | ___________________________________________ | | | | DATE OF REVIEW: 09.23.2016 | | PERMIT NO.: 16050249 | | ADDRESS: 3501 PARKER AVENUE | | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: BRETT | | TELEPHONE NO.: 561.324.1127 | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: NEW RECREATION BUILDING. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | REVIEW STATUS: PASSED WITH PROVISOS | | ___________________________________________ | | | | THIS REVIEW HAS BEEN PASSED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING | | PROVISOS: | | | | 1. PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, A REVISION SHALL BE SUBMITTED | | FOR APPROVAL OF THE BIKE RACK DETAIL. | | | | 2. SEPARATE PERMITS SHALL BE OBTAINED FOR LANDSCAPING | | AND IRRIGATION. ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE PERMITTED, | | INSTALLED AND PASSED INSPECTION PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE | | OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY (CO). | | | | 3. ALL OUTSTANDING LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING ENCLOSURES | | FOR THE ENTIRE PBAU ATHLETIC COMPLEX WILL BE REQUIRED | | TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A CO FOR THE | | RECREATION BUILDING. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | P: 561.822.1448 | | F: 561.822.1460 | | | | E: [email protected] | | | | W: WPB.ORG | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-09-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2016-09-19 |
Time |
11:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2016-09-19 |
Time |
11:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-09-19 11:10:41 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW | | ___________________________________________ | | | | DATE OF REVIEW: 09.19.2016 | | PERMIT NO.: 16050249 | | ADDRESS: | | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: | | TELEPHONE NO.: | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: NEW RECREATION BUILDING. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | REVIEW STATUS: FAILED | | ___________________________________________ | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN | | REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | 1. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ISSUED DURING THE MAJOR | | AMENDMENT PROCESS STILL NEED TO BE INCORPORATED INTO | | THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION: | | | | A. BIKE RACKS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE ENTRANCE (OR | | CLOSE TO) THE BUILDING. | | | | 2. SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR | | LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. | | | | 3. THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT (PREPARED BY KIMLEY-HORN & | | ASSOCIATES) SHALL BE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND/OR ACCEPTED BY | | PALM BEACH COUNTY PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING | | PERMIT. | | | | 4. PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL OUTSTANDING LANDSCAPING AND | | SCREENING ENCLOSURES FOR THE PBAU ATHLETIC COMPLEX WILL | | BE REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A | | CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE RECREATION BUILDING. | | | | 5. PLEASE INCLUDE THE SITE/MASTER PLAN, PREPARED BY | | WINSTON LEE & ASSOCIATES (LYNN BENDER), AS THIS IS THE | | OFFICIAL SITE/MASTER PLAN FOR THE PBAU ATHLETIC CAMPUS | | AND IS AN ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF ALL SITE | | IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE TO OCCUR AROUND THE BUILDING. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | P: 561.822.1448 | | F: 561.822.1460 | | | | E: [email protected] | | | | W: WPB.ORG |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-09-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2016-09-02 |
Time |
11:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2016-09-02 |
Time |
11:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-09-02 11:11:10 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW | | ___________________________________________ | | | | DATE OF REVIEW: 09.02.2016 | | PERMIT NO.: 16050249 | | ADDRESS: | | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: | | TELEPHONE NO.: | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: NEW RECREATION BUILDING. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | REVIEW STATUS: FAILED | | ___________________________________________ | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN | | REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, A MAJOR | | AMENDMENT TO THE PALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY (PBAU) | | ATHLETIC COMPLEX COMMUNITY SERVICE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT | | (CSPD) SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION. SUCH | | APPLICATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED AND IS BEING REVIEWED AT | | THIS TIME. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ISSUED DURING THE | | MAJOR AMENDMENT PROCESS WILL NEED TO BE INCORPORATED | | INTO THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION: | | | | A. BIKE RACKS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE ENTRANCE (OR | | CLOSE TO) THE BUILDING. | | | | 2. SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR | | LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. | | | | 3. THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT (PREPARED BY KIMLEY-HORN & | | ASSOCIATES) SHALL BE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND/OR ACCEPTED BY | | PALM BEACH COUNTY PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING | | PERMIT. | | | | 4. PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL OUTSTANDING LANDSCAPING AND | | SCREENING ENCLOSURES FOR THE PBAU ATHLETIC COMPLEX WILL | | BE REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A | | CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE RECREATION BUILDING. | | | | 5. PLEASE INCLUDE THE SITE/MASTER PLAN, PREPARED BY | | WINSTON LEE & ASSOCIATES (LYNN BENDER), AS THIS IS THE | | OFFICIAL SITE/MASTER PLAN FOR THE PBAU ATHLETIC CAMPUS | | AND IS AN ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF ALL SITE | | IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE TO OCCUR AROUND THE BUILDING. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | P: 561.822.1448 | | F: 561.822.1460 | | | | E: [email protected] | | | | W: WPB.ORG |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-07-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2016-07-06 |
Time |
09:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2016-07-06 |
Time |
09:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-07-06 09:28:15 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW | | ___________________________________________ | | | | DATE OF REVIEW: 07.06.2016 | | PERMIT NO.: 16050249 | | ADDRESS: | | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: | | TELEPHONE NO.: | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: NEW RECREATION BUILDING. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | REVIEW STATUS: FAILED | | ___________________________________________ | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN | | REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, A MAJOR | | AMENDMENT TO THE PALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY (PBAU) | | ATHLETIC COMPLEX COMMUNITY SERVICE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT | | (CSPD) SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION. SUCH | | APPLICATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED AND IS BEING REVIEWED AT | | THIS TIME. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ISSUED DURING THE | | MAJOR AMENDMENT PROCESS WILL NEED TO BE INCORPORATED | | INTO THE BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION: | | | | A. THE CORNER OF THE COVERED WALKWAY AT THE FAR NORTH | | END OF THE BUILDING ENCROACHES INTO AN EXISTING FPL | | EASEMENT. EASEMENT CONSENT SHALL BE PROVIDED, OR THE | | BUILDING SHALL BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. | | | | B. BIKE RACKS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE ENTRANCE (OR | | CLOSE TO) THE BUILDING. | | | | 2. SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR | | LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. | | | | 3. THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT (PREPARED BY KIMLEY-HORN & | | ASSOCIATES) SHALL BE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND/OR ACCEPTED BY | | PALM BEACH COUNTY PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING | | PERMIT. | | | | 4. PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL OUTSTANDING LANDSCAPING AND | | SCREENING ENCLOSURES FOR THE PBAU ATHLETIC COMPLEX WILL | | BE REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A | | CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR THE RECREATION BUILDING. | | | | 5. PLEASE INCLUDE THE SITE/MASTER PLAN, PREPARED BY | | WINSTON LEE & ASSOCIATES (LYNN BENDER), AS THIS IS THE | | OFFICIAL SITE/MASTER PLAN FOR THE PBAU ATHLETIC CAMPUS | | AND IS AN ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF ALL SITE | | IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE TO OCCUR AROUND THE BUILDING. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | P: 561.822.1448 | | F: 561.822.1460 | | | | E: [email protected] | | | | W: WPB.ORG |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-06-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2016-06-06 |
Time |
14:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2016-06-06 |
Time |
14:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-06-06 14:37:02 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW | | ___________________________________________ | | | | DATE OF REVIEW: 06.06.2016 | | PERMIT NO.: 16050249 | | ADDRESS: | | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: | | TELEPHONE NO.: | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: NEW RECREATION BUILDING. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | REVIEW STATUS: FAILED | | ___________________________________________ | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN | | REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, A MAJOR | | AMENDMENT TO THE PALM BEACH ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY (PBAU) | | ATHLETIC COMPLEX COMMUNITY SERVICE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT | | (CSPD) SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION. SUCH | | APPLICATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED AND IS BEING REVIEWED AT | | THIS TIME. ANY COMMENTS ISSUED DURING THE MAJOR | | AMENDMENT PROCESS WILL NEED TO BE INCORPORATED INTO THE | | BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | 2. SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR | | LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | P: 561.822.1448 | | F: 561.822.1460 | | | | E: [email protected] | | | | W: WPB.ORG | | |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |