| 2016-04-20 15:50:04 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1) SHEET AA 102 - EXITING THROUGH A GATE DOOR IS |
| | INDICATED NEAR CLERKS OFFICE 102. NO INFORMATION IS |
| | PROVIDED FOR THIS EXIT DOOR INCLUDING EXIT HARDWARE. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS. |
| | |
| | 2) SHEET AA 102 - AN 1 HOUR WALL LINE IS INDICATED |
| | ALONG THE CORRIDOR/WORKSHOP WALL. THIS 1 HOUR WALL |
| | DESIGN INDICATED A "JOG" AT THE BOTTOM OF THE STAIRS. |
| | THIS IS INCONSISTANT WILL OTHER SHEET DESIGNS SHOWING A |
| | STRIGHT WALL. PLEASE CORRECT OR CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 3) SHEET 102-105 - THE STAIRS FROM THE MEZZANINE SHOWS |
| | A DOOR ALONG THE CORRIDOR WALL TO EXIT; HOWEVER, SHEET |
| | EO101-102 SHOW A DIFFERENT DESIGN. PLEASE CORRECT AND |
| | CLARIFY WHICH ONE IS ACCURATE. |
| | |
| | 4) SHEET AA 103 - THE DOORS ALONG THE CORRIDOR OF ROOMS |
| | 116 (JAN. CLOST, 128 (TRAINING STORAGE) AND 122 (IT |
| | ROOM) OPEN INTO THE EXIT CORRIDOR.PER NFPA 101 CHAPTER |
| | 7, MEANS OF EGRESS |
| | 7.2.1.4.3 DOOR LEAF ENCROACHMENT |
| | 7.2.1.4.3.1 DURING ITS SWING, ANY DOOR LEAF IN A MEANS |
| | OF EGRESS SHALL LEAVE NOT LESS THAN ONE-HALF OF THE |
| | REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, A CORRIDOR, A PASSAGEWAY, |
| | OR A LANDING UNOBSTRUCTED AND SHALL NOT PROJECT NOT |
| | MORE THAN 7 IN. INTO THE REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, A |
| | CORRIDOR, A PASSAGE WAY, OR A LANDING, WHEN FULLY OPEN, |
| | UNLESS BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET: |
| | (1) THE DOOR OPENING PROVIDES ACCESS TO A STAIR IN AN |
| | EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | (2) THE DOOR OPENING MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS THAT LIMITS |
| | PROJECTION TO NOT MORE THAN 7 IN. INTO THE REQUIRED |
| | WIDTH OF THE STAIR LANDING WHEN THE DOOR LEAF IS FULLY |
| | OPEN. |
| | |
| | PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 5) SHEET AA 114 - THE DOOR SCHEDULE INDICATES A FUSIBLE |
| | LINK FOR DOOR 104 C. IN THE EVENT OF AN ACTIVATION AND |
| | THE DOOR DEPLOYS, HOW DOES A PERSON EXIT FROM THE |
| | ISOLATED AREA BY THE ELECRTRICAL AND FACITITY STORAGE |
| | ROOMS AND AREA? PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 6) SHEET AA 200-301- INCORRECT REFERENCES TO THE FIRE |
| | CODE ARE NOTED AND ARE INCONSISTENT ON REFERENCED |
| | PAGES. THE PROPOSED PROJECT SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF THE 5TH EDITION OF FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE |
| | INCLUDING THE 2012 EDITION OF NFPA 1 AND NFPA 101 AND |
| | ALL OTHER APPLICABLE CODES OR STANDARDS. |
| | |
| | FOR CLARIFICATION AND CORRECTION PURPOSES: |
| | |
| | THE CURRENT FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, THE 5TH |
| | EDITION, WAS ADOPED BY THE STATE OF FLORIDA ON DECEMBER |
| | 31, 2014; HOWEVER, IT INCLUDES THE 2012 EDITIONS OF |
| | NFPA 1 & 101. REFERENCES TO THE 5TH EDITION OR THE 2012 |
| | EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE IS |
| | SUFFICIENT IN THESE AREAS. |
| | |
| | 7) SHEET AA 301 - A TRAVEL DISTANCE OF 210 FEET AND 126 |
| | FEET ARE INDICATED FROM WITHIN THE SEPARATE PIT AREAS. |
| | PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 40, TABLE 40.2.2, A COMMON PATH |
| | OF TRAVEL CAN NOT EXCEED 100 FEET. PLEASE REVIEW AND |
| | CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 8) SHEET EC 101 - EXIT SIGNS SHOULD DIRECT OCCUPANTS TO |
| | THE NEAREST EXIT. THE EXIT SIGN 2ND FROM THE NORTH WALL |
| | INDICATES AN ARROW POINTING AWAY FROM THE NEAREST EXIT. |
| | PLEASE TURN THIS EXIT ARROW IN THE OTHER DIRECTION |
| | TOWARDS THE NORTH EXIT DOOR. |
| | |
| | 9) SHEET EC 101 - THERE IS AN EXIT THAT PASSES THROUGH |
| | A FENCE GATE TYPE DOOR WITH NO EXIT SIGN AT THAT DOOR. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE AN EXIT SIGN AT THE FENCE GATE DOOR. |
| | |
| | 10) SHEET EP 101 - EXIT SIGNS NEED TO BE INSTALLED AT |
| | THE CENTER ENDS OF EACH PIT CORRIDOR. THE PROPOSED |
| | INDICATED EXIT SIGNS CAN NOT BE SEEN ALONG THE LONG |
| | CORRIDOR. |
| | |
| | 11) SHEET ECA 302 - A NOTE ADDRESSING THE FA SOUND |
| | LEVEL WITHIN THE PIT AREA IS INDICATED; HOWEVER, THE IS |
| | NO INDICATION ACCOUNTING OF VISUAL OR STROBE FA |
| | DEVICES. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | 12) SHEET FP 103 - THE FLOOR LAYOUT OF THE WORKSHOP AND |
| | MEZZANINE DOES NOT MATCH SHEET AA 106. PLEASE CORRECT |
| | AND/OR CONFIRM WHICH ONE. |
| | |
| | 13) SHEET FP 202 - THERE IS A NOTE INDICATING " FIRE |
| | PUMP CONTROL CONTROLLER W / ATS. WHAT IS ATS? IT IS NOT |
| | INDICATED IN THE ABBGREVIATIONS TABLE ON SHEET FP 001. |
| | |
| | 14) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED BASED ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
