Plan Review Stops For Permit 16020030 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-03-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2016-03-29 |
Time |
19:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2016-03-29 |
Time |
19:23 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-02-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2016-02-10 |
Time |
07:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2016-02-10 |
Time |
07:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-03-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2016-03-30 |
Time |
13:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2016-03-30 |
Time |
12:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-03-30 13:51:04 | ELECTRICAL REVIEW NOTES | | REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH: | | 5TH EDITION FBC 2014, NFPA 70 2011 (NEC) | | | | CORRECTIONS REQUIRED: | | 1. ACCORDING TO THE SUBMITTED SITE PLAN, THE OVERHEAD | | SERVICE CONDUCTORS ARE CROSSING OVER THE POOL. SEE NEC | | TABLE 680.8 FOR MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. | | 2. THERE SEEMS TO BE A CONFLICT BETWEEN THE SITE PLAN | | AND THE SITE SURVEY. THE SURVEY SHOWS THE O/H | | CONDUCTORS, YET THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT. COMPARING THE | | PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED SITE DRAWING TO THE CURRENT THERE | | CONTINUES TO BE A CONFLICT. THE OLD SITE PLAN SHOWS THE | | O/H CONDUCTORS WITH A NOTE INDICATING THAT THEY WILL BE | | REMOVED BY OWNER. THE CURRENT SITE PLAN NO LONGER HAS | | THE O/H SERVICE CONDUCTORS, BUT OUR SYSTEM DOES NOT | | REFLECT THAT AN ELECTRICAL PERMIT FOR THE CHANGE WAS | | EVER ISSUED. THIS MATTER NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED PRIOR TO | | THE ISSUANCE OF THE PERMIT. | | 3. YOU MUST SHOW THE EQUI-POTENTIAL BONDING ON THE | | DRAWINGS AS INDICATED IN NEC 680.26. | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, FOR A QUICKER RETURN ON YOUR | | RE-SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER | | (NARRATIVE) ADDRESSING EACH ITEM AND THE PAGE NUMBER | | WHERE THE CORRECTIONS APPEAR ALONG WITH THE STANDARD | | CITY RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT | | CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. MARK VOID | | AND LEAVE THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS FOR | | COMPARATIVE REVIEW. CLOUDING THE CHANGES WILL BE | | GREATLY APPRECIATED. | | | | IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO | | CONTACT ME DIRECTLY. | | | | THANK YOU, | | MIKE ALBARRAN | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | PH: 561-805-6746 | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-02-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2016-02-05 |
Time |
10:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2016-02-05 |
Time |
09:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-02-05 10:42:13 | 1ST ELECTRICAL REVIEW NOTES: | | REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH: | | FBC 5TH EDITION 2014 | | NFPA 70 2011 (NEC) | | | | CORRECTIONS REQUIRED: | | 1. YOU SHALL PROVIDE AN ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM | | INDICATING ALL THE PROPOSED POOL EQUIPMENT AND | | LIGHTING. THIS SHOULD ALSO INDICATE THE TYPE OF POOL | | LIGHTING PROPOSED IF ANY. | | 2. FROM THE SITE PLAN PROVIDED, ACTUAL MEASUREMENTS FOR | | THE LOCATION OF OVERHEAD SERVICE CONDUCTORS IN RELATION | | TO THE POOL WOULD NOT BE PRACTICAL. THE PLAN HAS A NOTE | | INDICATING THAT THE SERVICE DROP WILL BE REMOVED BY THE | | OWNER. VERIFY OVERHEAD CONDUCTOR CLEARANCES AS | | INDICATED IN NEC 680.8 IF IT IS TO REMAIN AND REVISE | | THE DRAWING TO REMOVE SUCH NOTE. | | 3. WHEN DIGGING THE HOLE FOR THE POOL SHELL, ASCERTAIN | | COMPLIANCE WITH NEC 680.10 WHICH PROHIBITS ANY | | UNDERGROUND WIRING WITHIN 5? HORIZONTALLY OF THE POOL | | SHELL UNLESS THE WIRING IS DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE | | POOL. | | 4. ALL POOL BONDING AS REQUIRED BY NEC 680.26 SHALL BE | | INDICATED ON DRAWINGS. | | 5. IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-R | | CHAPTER 42. | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, FOR A QUICKER RETURN ON YOUR | | RE-SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER | | (NARRATIVE) ADDRESSING EACH ITEM AND THE PAGE NUMBER | | WHERE THE CORRECTIONS APPEAR ALONG WITH THE STANDARD | | CITY RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT | | CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. MARK VOID | | AND LEAVE THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS FOR | | COMPARATIVE REVIEW. CLOUDING THE CHANGES WILL BE | | GREATLY APPRECIATED. | | | | IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO | | CONTACT ME DIRECTLY. | | | | THANK YOU, | | MIKE ALBARRAN | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | PH: 561-805-6746 | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-02-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-02-08 |
Time |
04:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-02-08 |
Time |
04:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-02-08 04:57:48 | THERE IS NO GAS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS POOL. |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-04-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-04-04 |
Time |
06:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-03-22 |
Time |
09:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-03-22 09:41:28 | RESUB ROUTED TO AJONES VIA ZONING INBOX |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-02-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2016-02-10 |
Time |
07:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2016-02-01 |
Time |
13:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-02-02 13:53:38 | ROUTED TO ZONING |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-04-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-04-04 |
Time |
06:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-04-04 |
Time |
05:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-04-04 05:53:31 | NONE OF THE PLUMBING COMMENTS FROM THE FIRST REVIEW | | HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | 1) PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS ON THE PUMP, | | TSUNAMI VALVE,& MDX REMOVAL SYSTEM. FBC | | SEC.107.2.1.SUBMIT COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE | | PUMP. THE ONE SHEET THAT WAS SUBMITTED IS UNACCEPTABLE. | | 2) SUPPLY TOTAL DYNAMIC HEAD CALCULATIONS, PUMP | | CURVE,TURNOVER RATE, ETC. FBC SEC.107.2.1. | | 3) PLEASE REVISE THE CODE REFERENCE ON THE THE PLANS TO | | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. | | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | TIM LARGE | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | 561-805-6692 | | [email protected] | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-02-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-02-08 |
Time |
05:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-02-08 |
Time |
04:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-02-08 05:07:08 | 1) PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS ON THE PUMP, | | TSUNAMI VALVE,& MDX REMOVAL SYSTEM. FBC SEC.107.2.1. | | 2) SUPPLY TOTAL DYNAMIC HEAD CALCULATIONS, PUMP | | CURVE,TURNOVER RATE, ETC. FBC SEC.107.2.1. | | 3) PLEASE REVISE THE CODE REFERENCE ON THE THE PLANS TO | | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. | | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | TIM LARGE | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | 561-805-6692 | | [email protected] | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-02-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
ajones |
Date |
2016-02-04 |
Time |
16:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
ajones |
Date |
2016-02-04 |
Time |
16:47 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
|
|