Plan Review Stops For Permit 16010225 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-04-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-04-06 |
Time |
18:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-04-06 |
Time |
18:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-04-06 18:18:13 | | | | | BUILDING REVIEW APPROVED WITH PROVISO: | | 1- REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED TO MATCH | | PLANS.; A) CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA. B) FLOOR AREAS. C) | | ROOF MATERIAL. D) TAKING CEILING FAN CREDIT. PROVIDE | | FANS SIZES REQ'D BY SEC. R405.7.6 FBC ENERGY | | CONSERVATION. E) REVISE ATTIC VENT RATIO OF 1/300. SEE | | SEC. R806.2 OF THE FBC-RESIDENTIAL. | | | | NOTE: LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR | | AND SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | WILL BE REQUIRED. | 2018-04-06 18:17:43 | 04/06/18 MET WITH MR. ERNEST (OWNER). HE WANTS PERMIT | | TO BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO. JG. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-03-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-03-29 |
Time |
12:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-03-29 |
Time |
08:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-03-29 08:34:23 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) SIXTH BUILDING REVIEW | | CHECKLIST. | | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | NOTE: | | BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO | | MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT REQUIRED INFORMATION AFTER | | THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID | | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES APPLY. CONTRACTOR TO | | ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED AT THIS TIME OR | | IF RE-SUBMITTING REQUIRED INFORMATION BEFORE PERMIT | | ISSUANCE. | | | | IMPORTANT: | | NEED OWNER TO SIGN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS FOR PROVISO | | OPTION. PERMIT CAN NOT BE ISSUED WITHOUT THE OWNER'S | | CERTIFICATION. | | | | | | 1-ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: | | A) THE OWNER OR OWNER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT NEEDS TO | | CERTIFY AND DATE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AT THE BOTTOM | | OF FORM AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY | | CONSERVATION. THE FORM SUBMITTED ONLY HAVE THE NAME OF | | THE PERSON PREPARING THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. NEED THE | | OWNER OR LEGALLY DESIGNATED AGENT TO CERTIFY | | COMPLIANCE. PERMIT CAN NOT BE ISSUED WITHOUT THE | | OWNER'S CERTIFICATION. | | | | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. | | | | B) CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA SHOWN ON ITEM #6 WAS REVISED. | | NOW, IT DOESN'T MATCH FLOOR PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | (NOTE: REVISE THE AREAS SHOWN ON ITEM #8 ACCORDINGLY). | | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. | | | | C) ROOF MATERIAL SHOWN ON PAGE 2 OF 5 WAS REVISED. NOW | | IT DOESN'T MATCH MATERIAL SPECIFIED ON PLANS. REVISE AS | | REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. | | | | D) THERE ARE TWO NEW INSULATED DOORS SHOWN ON PAGE 3 OF | | 5. THERE ARE NOT INSULATED DOORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS OR | | PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED. WHERE ARE THESE DOORS. | | REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH PLANS. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 | | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. | | | | E) ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE TAKING THE CEILING FAN | | CREDIT. PREPARER TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND | | SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW THE HOUSE COMPLIES WITH THE | | CEILING FAN CREDIT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.7.6 FBC | | ENERGY CONSERVATION. SHOW ALL CEILING FAN SIZES AND | | LOCATION. | | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. | | | | F) ENERGY CALCULATIONS SHOW AN ATTIC VENT RATIO OF | | 1/300 ON PAGE 2 OF 5. SEC. R806.2 OF THE | | FBC-RESIDENTIAL REQUIRES 1/150 RATIO. PLANS DON'T SEEM | | TO HAVE THE HOUSE DESIGNED FOR 1/300 VENT RATIO. | | PREPARER TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS | | SHOWING HOW THE HOUSE COMPLIES WITH THE 1/300 RATIO AS | | REQUIRED BY EXCEPTION OF SEC. R806.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. | | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. | | | | NOTE: LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR | | AND SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | WILL BE REQUIRED WHEN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT | | USING THE SOFTWARE DEFAULT FACTOR FOR GLAZING. | | | | | | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH | | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | ***PLEASE REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY REVISED DRAWING. DON'T | | STAPLE OLD COPY TO THE PLANS. SUBMIT OLD COPIES FOR | | REFERENCE. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | JULIO GOMEZ | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | (561)805-6712 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-03-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-03-19 |
Time |
08:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-03-19 |
Time |
08:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-03-20 08:11:19 | EXPIRED? |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-09-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-09-28 |
Time |
12:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-09-28 |
Time |
12:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-09-28 12:56:08 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) FIFTH BUILDING REVIEW | | CHECKLIST. | | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | | | NOTE: | | MISSING ONE SET OF DRAWINGS | | | | | | | | 1-ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | A) BUILDER TO COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL | | (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.3 OF FBC-ENERGY | | CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | RESPONSE: | | THE INFORMATION IS INCOMPLETE. BUILDER DIDN'T WROTE THE | | ADDRESS OF THE NEW HOME. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | B) THE OWNER OR OWNER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT NEEDS TO | | CERTIFY AND DATE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AT THE BOTTOM | | OF FORM AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY | | CONSERVATION. ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED SHOW THE | | NAME OF THE OWNER ONLY. THIS IS NOT CERTIFICATION THAT | | THE OWNER IS COMPLYING WITH THE ENERGY CODE. HE/SHE MAY | | NOT EVEN BE AWARE OF THIS CERTIFICATION. NEED THE OWNER | | OR AGENT TO SPECIFICALLY CERTIFY COMPLIANCE. | | | | RESPONSE: | | THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED NOW ARE DONE BY | | ANOTHER PERSON. THIS SAME PERSON IS CERTIFYING ON THE | | OWNER/AGENT LINE. PROVIDE PROOF THAT THE PERSON | | CERTIFYING CODE COMPLIANCE IS LEGALLY DESIGNATED BY THE | | OWNER AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY | | CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). PERMIT CAN NOT BE | | ISSUED WITHOUT THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATION. SEC. | | R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | C) CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA SHOWN ON ITEM #6 WAS REVISED. | | NOW, IT DOESN'T MATCH FLOOR PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | (NOTE: REVISE THE AREAS SHOWN ON ITEM #8 ACCORDINGLY). | | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | RESPONSE: | | NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | D) ROOF MATERIAL SHOWN ON PAGE 2 OF 5 WAS REVISED. NOW | | IT DOESN'T MATCH MATERIAL SPECIFIED ON PLANS. REVISE AS | | REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | RESPONSE: | | NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | E) THERE ARE TWO NEW INSULATED DOORS SHOWN ON PAGE 3 OF | | 5. THERE ARE NOT INSULATED DOORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS OR | | PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED. WHERE ARE THESE DOORS. | | REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH PLANS. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 | | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | RESPONSE: | | NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | NOTE: LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR | | AND SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | WILL BE REQUIRED WHEN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT | | USING THE SOFTWARE DEFAULT FACTOR FOR GLAZING. | | | | F) ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE TAKING THE CEILING FAN | | CREDIT. PREPARER TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND | | SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW THE HOUSE COMPLIES WITH THE | | CEILING FAN CREDIT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.7.6 FBC | | ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | G) ENERGY CALCULATIONS SHOW AN ATTIC VENT RATIO OF | | 1/300 ON PAGE 2 OF 5. SEC. R806.2 OF THE | | FBC-RESIDENTIAL REQUIRES 1/150 RATIO. PREPARER TO | | PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW | | THE HOUSE COMPLIES WITH THE 1/300 RATIO AS REQUIRED BY | | EXCEPTION OF SEC. R806.2 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. | | | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | 2- ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE TAKING THE CEILING FAN AND | | CROSS VENTILATION CREDITS ON ITEM #15 OF PAGE 1 OF 5. | | DESIGNER OF RECORD TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND | | SPECIFICATIONS ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS SHOWING | | FULL COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R405.7.6 AND SEC. R405.7.4 OF | | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | RESPONSE: | | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE | | STILL TAKING THE CEILING FAN CREDIT. DESIGNER OF RECORD | | NEEDS TO SHOW IN PLANS COMPLIANCE WITH THE CEILING FAN | | REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE ALL THE INFORMATION REQUIRED BY | | SEC. R405.7.6 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH | | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | ***PLEASE REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY REVISED DRAWING. DON'T | | STAPLE OLD COPY TO THE PLANS. SUBMIT OLD COPIES FOR | | REFERENCE. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | JULIO GOMEZ | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | (561)805-6712 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-08-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-08-17 |
Time |
08:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-08-16 |
Time |
19:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-08-17 08:55:58 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) FOURTH BUILDING REVIEW | | CHECKLIST. | | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | ***NOTE: | | BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO ONCE THE | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE CERTIFIED BY THE OWNER. PROVISO | | MEANS THAT PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED AFTER THE IMPACT FEES | | AND RECEIPT ARE SUBMITTED. THE REQUIRED INFORMATION MAY | | BE SUBMITTED AFTER THE PERMIT IS ISSUED. REVISION FEES | | MAY APPLY EXCEPT FOR THE ENTRY DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | REQUIRED INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO | | INSPECTIONS TO AVOID CONFLICTS OR DELAYS. CONTRACTOR TO | | ADVICE IN WRITING IF PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED AT | | THIS TIME. | | | | | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | 1-ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | A) BUILDER TO COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL | | (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.3 OF FBC-ENERGY | | CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | RESPONSE: | | REPEAT COMMENT. FOUR TIMES. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | B) THE OWNER OR OWNER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT NEEDS TO | | CERTIFY AND DATE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AT THE BOTTOM | | OF FORM AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY | | CONSERVATION. ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED SHOW THE | | NAME OF THE OWNER ONLY. THIS IS NOT CERTIFICATION THAT | | THE OWNER IS COMPLYING WITH THE ENERGY CODE. HE/SHE MAY | | NOT EVEN BE AWARE OF THIS CERTIFICATION. NEED THE OWNER | | OR AGENT TO SPECIFICALLY CERTIFY COMPLIANCE. | | | | RESPONSE: | | REPEAT COMMENT. TWO TIMES. WRITING DOWN THE NAME OF THE | | OWNER IS NOT PROOF THAT THE OWNER IS CERTIFYING | | COMPLIANCE. PERMIT CAN NOT BE ISSUED WITHOUT THE | | OWNER'S CERTIFICATION. SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY | | CONSERVATION. | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | C) CONDITIONED FLOOR AREA SHOWN ON ITEM #6 WAS REVISED. | | NOW, IT DOESN'T MATCH FLOOR PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | (NOTE: REVISE THE AREAS SHOWN ON ITEM #8 ACCORDINGLY). | | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | D) ROOF MATERIAL SHOWN ON PAGE 2 OF 5 WAS REVISED. NOW | | IT DOESN'T MATCH MATERIAL SPECIFIED ON PLANS. REVISE AS | | REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | E) THERE ARE TWO NEW INSULATED DOORS SHOWN ON PAGE 3 OF | | 5. THERE ARE NOT INSULATED DOORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS OR | | PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED. WHERE ARE THESE DOORS. | | REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH PLANS. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 | | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | NOTE: LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR | | AND SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | WILL BE REQUIRED WHEN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT | | USING THE SOFTWARE DEFAULT FACTOR FOR GLAZING. | | | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | 2- ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE TAKING THE CEILING FAN AND | | CROSS VENTILATION CREDITS ON ITEM #15 OF PAGE 1 OF 5. | | DESIGNER OF RECORD TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND | | SPECIFICATIONS ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS SHOWING | | FULL COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R405.7.6 AND SEC. R405.7.4 OF | | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | RESPONSE: | | REPEAT COMMENT. ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE STILL TAKING | | THE CEILING FAN CREDIT. DESIGNER OF RECORD NEEDS TO | | SHOW IN PLANS COMPLIANCE WITH THE CEILING FAN | | REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE ALL THE INFORMATION REQUIRED BY | | SEC. R405.7.6 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | 3- AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED, BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH | | COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD.) FOR IMPACT FEES ASSESSMENT. | | BRING BACK COUNTY STAMPED PLANS AND COPY OF PAID | | RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. COUNTY IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE OF | | THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. | | | | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH | | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | ***PLEASE REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY REVISED DRAWING. DON'T | | STAPLE OLD COPY TO THE PLANS. SUBMIT OLD COPIES FOR | | REFERENCE. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | JULIO GOMEZ | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-06-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-06-15 |
Time |
13:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-06-15 |
Time |
13:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-06-15 13:43:38 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) THIRD BUILDING REVIEW | | CHECKLIST. | | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | 1- PROVIDE SOIL TEST REPORT (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | SEC. R401.4 OF FBC RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. 3 TIMES. STILL NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | 2- PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. | | R401.3 OF FBC RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. 3 TIMES. STILL NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | 3- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: | | A) WINDOWS INFORMATION, WHICH INCLUDES DOORS WITH | | GLAZING, DOESN'T MATCH PLANS. IT LOOKS LIKE THERE ARE | | MORE WINDOWS SHOWN ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS THAN | | THERE ARE ON PLANS. PLEASE NUMBER EACH WINDOW/DOOR ON | | THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS TO VERIFY THAT INFORMATION | | MATCHES. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | B) BUILDER TO COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL | | (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.3 OF FBC-ENERGY | | CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | RESPONSE: NOT DONE. REPEAT COMMENT.. 3 TIMES. | | | | C) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF THE FORM | | INCLUDING: BUILDER NAME AND PERMIT OFFICE. SEC. | | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. | | | | D) THE OWNER OR OWNER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT NEEDS TO | | CERTIFY AND DATE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AT THE BOTTOM | | OF FORM AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC- ENERGY | | CONSERVATION. ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED SHOW THE | | NAME OF THE OWNER ONLY. THIS IS NOT CERTIFICATION THAT | | THE OWNER IS COMPLYING WITH THE ENERGY CODE. HE/SHE MAY | | NOT BE EVEN AWARE OF THIS CERTIFICATION. NEED THE OWNER | | OR AGENT TO SPECIFICALLY CERTIFY COMPLIANCE. | | | | NOTE: LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR | | AND SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | WILL BE REQUIRED WHEN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT | | USING THE SOFTWARE DEFAULT FACTOR FOR GLAZING. | | | | NEW COMMENT: | | 4- ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE TAKING THE CEILING FAN AND | | CROSS VENTILATION CREDITS ON ITEM #15 OF PAGE 1 OF 5. | | DESIGNER OF RECORD TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND | | SPECIFICATIONS ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS SHOWING | | FULL COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R405.7.6 AND SEC. R405.7.4 OF | | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | NOTE: SEE COMMENT REGARDING THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. | | MAY BE THAT'S WHY THE CREDITS WERE TAKEN. IT SEEMS THAT | | THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE SHOWING MORE GLASS THAN | | THERE IS IN THE HOUSE. | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | 5- SUBMITTAL PACKAGE IS MISSING ONE SET OF PRODUCT | | APPROVALS. PROVIDE THE SECOND SET. | | | | RESPONSE: THERE ARE SOME PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT ARE | | MISSING. REVIEW COMPLETE PACKAGE SUBMITTED AND PROVIDE | | TWO COMPLETE SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS REVIEWED BY THE | | ENGINEER OF RECORD. | | | | 6- AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED, BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH | | COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD.) FOR IMPACT FEES ASSESSMENT. | | BRING BACK COUNTY STAMPED PLANS AND COPY OF PAID | | RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. COUNTY IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE OF | | THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. | | | | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH | | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | ***PLEASE REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY REVISED DRAWING. DON'T | | STAPLE OLD COPY TO THE PLANS. SUBMIT OLD COPIES FOR | | REFERENCE. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | JULIO GOMEZ | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-05-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-05-05 |
Time |
14:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-05-05 |
Time |
14:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-05-05 14:40:20 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) SECOND BUILDING REVIEW | | CHECKLIST. | | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | 1- PROVIDE SOIL TEST REPORT (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | SEC. R401.4 OF FBC RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | (REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. NEED REPORT TO VERIFY | | PROPOSED DESIGN AND SOIL PREPARATION RECOMMENDATIONS.). | | | | 2- PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. | | R401.3 OF FBC RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). (REPEAT | | COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED). | | | | 3- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED; | | (NOTE: ENGINEER MAY BE CHARGED 4 TIMES THE PLAN REVIEW | | FEES AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B) EACH | | TIME AFTER THE THIRD REVIEW IF THE PLANS ARE DENIED) | | | | A) TYPE OF ADJACENT WALL SHOWN ON ITEM #9 IS INCORRECT. | | SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 OF | | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). (REPEAT | | COMMENT. NOTE: REVISE TYPE OF WALL AND INSULATION | | R-VALUE. SEE PLANS). | | | | B) PAGE 3 OF 5: WHERE IS THE NORTH INSULATED DOOR ON | | THE SECOND FLOOR SHOWN ON PLANS. THERE ARE NO INSULATED | | DOORS ON SECOND FLOOR. SEE PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS | | AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 OF FBC-ENERGY | | CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). (REPEAT COMMENT). | | | | C) WALLS INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 5 FOR THE GARAGE WALL | | IS INCORRECT. REVISE THE WALL ORIENTATION AND WALL | | TYPE. SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. THERE ARE NO | | GARAGE STEEL WALLS ON THE SECOND FLOOR. SEC. | | R101.5.1.1.2 OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION | | (2014). (REPEAT COMMENT). | | | | D) BUILDER TO COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL | | (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.3 OF FBC-ENERGY | | CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). (REPEAT COMMENT). | | | | NOTE: LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR | | AND SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | WILL BE REQUIRED WHEN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT | | USING THE SOFTWARE DEFAULT FACTOR FOR GLAZING. | | | | 4- SUBMITTAL PACKAGE IS MISSING ONE SET OF PRODUCT | | APPROVALS. PROVIDE THE SECOND SET. | | | | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH | | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | ***PLEASE REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY REVISED DRAWING. DON'T | | STAPLE OLD COPY TO THE PLANS. SUBMIT OLD COPIES FOR | | REFERENCE. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | JULIO GOMEZ | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-02-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-02-17 |
Time |
09:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-02-17 |
Time |
09:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-02-17 09:41:54 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) BUILDING REVIEW | | COMMENTS. | | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | 1- AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED, BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH | | COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD.) FOR IMPACT FEES ASSESSMENT. | | BRING BACK COUNTY STAMPED PLANS AND COPY OF PAID | | RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. COUNTY IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE OF | | THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. | | | | 2- ACCORDING TO SEC. R301.2.1.4 OF FBC RESIDENTIAL, 5TH | | EDITION (2014) THIS HOUSE IS LOCATED IN EXPOSURE "D" | | NOT EXPOSURE "C". REVISE INFORMATION ON DESIGN CRITERIA | | AND STRUCTURAL NOTES ON SHEET S.1. ALSO, REVISE THE | | DESIGN PRESSURES ON SHEET S.2 AND S.7. | | | | 3- GARAGE DOOR STRUCTURAL BUCK DETAIL ON SHEET S.1: (A) | | CLEARLY SPECIFY ANCHOR SPACING AT THE ENDS OF THE DOOR | | OPENING. INFORMATION ON DETAIL DOESN'T MATCH | | INFORMATION SHOWN ON GARAGE DOOR NOTES. ALSO, | | FOUNDATION PLAN SHOW FILLED CELLS AT THE ENDS OF THE | | GARAGE OPENINGS, NOT POURED CONCRETE. REVISE | | SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS | | SHOWING THAT THE PROPOSED ANCHOR SPACING IS ADEQUATE TO | | RESIST THE DESIGN PRESSURES. COORDINATE DESIGN | | PRESSURES WITH ITEM #2 ABOVE. SEC. R301 OF FBC | | RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | 4- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO | | LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, | | CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND ALL DESIGN | | PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY | | AMENDMENTS. VALUATION WAS UPDATED TO $413,334. THE | | PERMIT FEE BALANCE IS $6305.17. | | | | 5- STAIRWAY ON SHEET S.2: PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND | | SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE WINDER TREADS SHOWING COMPLIANCE | | WITH SEC. R311.7.5.2.1 OF FBC RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION | | (2014). CLEARLY PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THE NARROWEST | | PART OF THE TREAD. | | | | 6- REVISE TYPICAL STAIR & GUARDRAIL NOTES ON SHEET S.2. | | REVISE THE LIVE LOADS. SEE NOTES "D" , "F" AND "H" FROM | | TABLE R301.5 OF FBC RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014) AND | | REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | 7- PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE DOOR LEADING FROM | | GARAGE TO THE INTERIOR OF THE HOUSE. SPECIFY FIRE | | RATING AND SELF CLOSING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R302.5.1 OF | | FBC RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | 8- DIMENSION SHOWN ON THE BOTTOM TREAD OF THE REAR | | PORCH STAIRS IS TOO NARROW COMPARED TO THE OTHER ONES. | | REVISE AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R311.7.5.2. OF FBC | | RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | 9- ROOF DESIGN LOADS ON SHEET S.7: SPECIFY THE ATTIC | | LIVE LOAD AS REQUIRED BY NOTES "B" AND "G" OF TABLE | | R301.5 OF FBC RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | NOTE: COORDINATE LOADS WITH LOADS SHOWN ON THE | | STRUCTURAL NOTES ON SHEET S.1. | | | | 10- PROVIDE SOIL TEST REPORT (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | SEC. R401.4 OF FBC RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | 11- PROVIDE DRAINAGE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. | | R401.3 OF FBC RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | 12- PROVIDE SURVEY OR SITE PLAN AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | 107.3.5.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | 13-ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED; | | A) ENGINEER WHO PREPARED THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO | | PROVIDE HIS NAME AND ALL HIS INFORMATION AND TO PROVIDE | | ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 | | FL. ST. | | | | B) STREET ADDRESS IS INCORRECT. THE STREET IS MANGONIA | | DR. NOT MAGNOLIA DR. ALSO, THE NAME OF BUILDER IS | | INCORRECT. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 OF | | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | C) NUMBER OF BEDROOMS SHOWN ON ITEM # 3 IS INCORRECT.. | | SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 OF | | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | D) TYPE OF ADJACENT WALL SHOWN ON ITEM #9 IS INCORRECT. | | SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 OF | | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | E) TYPE OF HOT WATER SYSTEM SHOWN ON ITEM #14 IS | | INCORRECT. SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. | | R101.5.1.1.2 OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION | | (2014). | | | | F) ROOF MATERIAL SHOWN ON PAGE 2 OF 5 IS INCORRECT. SEE | | PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 OF | | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | G) WHERE IS THE NORTH WOOD DOOR SHOWN ON PAGE 3 OF 5?. | | THERE ARE NO WOOD DOORS ON SECOND OR FIRST FLOOR. SEE | | PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH | | EDITION (2014). | | | | H) WALLS INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 5 FOR THE GARAGE WALL | | IS INCORRECT. REVISE THE WALL ORIENTATION AND WALL | | TYPE. SEE PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. | | R101.5.1.1.2 OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION | | (2014). | | | | I) WINDOWS ORIENTATION, AREA AND OVERHANG DEPTH AND | | SEPARATION SHOWN ON PAGE 3 OF 5 DON'T MATCH PLANS. SEE | | PLANS AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 OF | | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | J) BUILDER TO COMPLETE THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE LEVEL | | (EPL) DISPLAY CARD. SEC. R405.3 OF FBC-ENERGY | | CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | K) PROVIDE DOORS AND WINDOWS DOCUMENTATION SHOWING THE | | U-FACTOR AND SHGC FACTOR SHOWN ON ITEM #7 AS REQUIRED | | BY SEC. R405.3 OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION | | (2014). | | | | NOTE: LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR | | AND SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | WILL BE REQUIRED WHEN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT | | USING THE SOFTWARE DEFAULT FACTOR FOR GLAZING. | | | | 14- CLARIFY DOORS #4 AND #5 ON THE EXTERIOR DOOR | | SCHEDULE ON SHEET S.2. WHAT'S (3)3'-0" X 8'-0"?. SEC. | | 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | 15- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY | | FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR: | | A) ENTRY DOOR SIZE AND TYPE AS SHOWN ON PLANS. DOOR | | WITH SIDELITES. FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL13540-R3 | | SUBMITTED DOESN'T COVER 8'-0" HIGH DOORS. | | | | B) PRECAST LINTELS. NOA 14-0903.03 SUBMITTED WITH | | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL158-R7 IS FOR 4", 6" & 12" | | LINTELS. NEED NOA FOR 8" LINTELS AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. | | | | C) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS | | AND DETAILS. PROVIDE ONLY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL | | COVER PAGE AND PAGE SHOWING THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR OR | | LIST THE FLORIDA 2014 CODE VERSION PRODUCT APPROVAL | | NEXT TO EACH SPECIFIED CONNECTOR. | | | | 16- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY THE METAL ROOF | | FASTENING FOR ALL ROOF ZONES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | 107.2.1.2 OF CITY AMENDMENTS. | | NOTE: CLEARLY IDENTIFY APPROVED ASSEMBLY ON METAL ROOF | | NOA 13-0114.03 SUBMITTED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. ALSO, SEE LIMITATION #2 ON | | PAGE 7 OF 9 OF NOA SUBMITTED. COORDINATE WITH REVISED | | DESIGN PRESSURES REQUIRED BY ITEM #2 ABOVE. | | | | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH | | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | ***PLEASE REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY REVISED DRAWING. DON'T | | STAPLE OLD COPY TO THE PLANS. SUBMIT OLD COPIES FOR | | REFERENCE. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | JULIO GOMEZ | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-06-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
vperez |
Date |
2016-06-17 |
Time |
11:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
vperez |
Date |
2016-06-17 |
Time |
11:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-04-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
vperez |
Date |
2016-04-07 |
Time |
09:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
vperez |
Date |
2016-04-07 |
Time |
09:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-02-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
vperez |
Date |
2016-02-11 |
Time |
07:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
vperez |
Date |
2016-02-11 |
Time |
07:53 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2016-02-11 07:54:02 | INITIAL ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | | APPLICABLE CODES IN EFFECT: | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE RESIDENTIAL 2014 5TH EDITION | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2014 5TH | | EDITION | | NFPA 70- 2011 NEC | | COMMENTS: | | | | 1. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE RISER DIAGRAM SHOWN AT 250A | | WITH COMBINATION BREAKERS IS NOT TYPICAL AS TO DESIGN | | OR PRODUCT MANUFACTURING. REVISE RISER DIAGRAM TO SHOW | | ACTUAL FIELD INSTALLATION FOR THE LOAD CALCULATION | | SHOWN. FOR EXAMPLE A TYPICAL INSTALLATION WOULD BE A | | 320A/400A CONTINUOUS METER CAN WITH MAIN BREAKERS SHOWN | | WIRED FROM METER CAN OR A 400AMP METER COMBO WITH TWO | | MAINS BREAKERS, FBC 107 MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA. | | 2. NOTE THAT THE CONDUCTORS SELECTED (3/0) FOR THE | | 100AMP PANEL IS ABOVE THE STANDARD CAPACITY OF THE | | TERMINATION LUGS MANUFACTURED FOR 100A PANEL BOARDS. | | TYPICALLY THESE PANELS HAVE LUGS TO HOLD FROM #6- TO | | #1/0 MAX. CONDUCTORS. EITHER SHOW SIZED WITH #3 | | CONDUCTORS FOR 100AMPS OR INCREASE PANEL MAIN BREAKER | | AND PANEL BOARD ACCORDINGLY. NEC 110.3 FBC 107 | | 3. SHOW THE SIZE OF THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR | | AT THE SERVICE. PER NEC 250.66 | | 4. SHOW AN INTERSYSTEM BONDING TERMINAL AT THE SERVICE. | | A NOTE WILL SUFFICE. NEC 250.94 | | 5. SHOW CORRECT SIZE OF MCB ON PANEL SCHEDULE A AT 200A | | NOT 250A. FBC 107 | | 6. IDENTIFY THE AREAS LABELED AS RECESSED LIGHTING ON | | PANEL SCHEDULES TO INDICATE SPECIFICALLY THE AREAS | | SERVED. NEC 408.4 | | 7. SHOW COMBINATION SMOKE/CO AT BOTH LANDINGS OF THE | | STAIRS AREA. FBC RES 314 | | 8. IF THE COUNTERTOP SPACE TO THE LEFT OF RANGE SHOWN | | IS 12? OR MORE PLEASE SHOW A RECEPTACLE FOR THAT AREA | | PER NEC 210.52C1. LABEL GFCI | | 9. PROVIDE A GENERAL NOTE TO PLANS TO INDICATE THE | | REQUIREMENTS FBC EC 405.1- NO LESS THAN 75% OF LAMPS TO | | BE HIGH EFFICACY LAMPS. | | 10. SHOW LOCATION OF THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE ON THE | | FLOOR PLAN. FBC 107 | | 11. FURTHER COMMENTS MAY FOLLOW PENDING COMMENTS BEING | | ADDRESSED. | | | | VALENTINO PEREZ | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER II | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2018-04-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-04-06 |
Time |
19:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-04-06 |
Time |
18:14 |
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
2018-04-06 18:16:58 | MET WITH MR. ERNEST (OWNER). HE WANTS PERMIT TO BE | | ISSUED WITH PROVISO. JG. |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2018-03-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-03-29 |
Time |
12:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-03-22 |
Time |
17:34 |
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
2018-03-22 17:34:42 | TO JG DESK | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2018-03-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2018-03-19 |
Time |
12:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2018-03-05 |
Time |
10:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-03-19 12:41:26 | 3/19/18 APPLICATION IS EXPIRED, SEE FRONT SCREEN. | | EMAILED CONTRACTOR AND CALLED OWNER. OWNER STATED THAT | | PLANS WERE DROPPED OFF AT PALM BEACH COUNTY IMPACT FEES | | 9/16 AND NOT RETURNED UNTIL 3/18. OWNER WAS INSTRUCTED | | TO WRITE A LETTER EXPLAINING "ACTIVITY" ON THE PERMIT, | | EMAIL TO ME AS AN ATTACHMENT (TO [email protected]), FOR | | BUILDING OFFICIAL'S CONSIDERATION. | | | 2018-03-06 10:30:23 | RESUB ROTUED TO TKLARGE |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-09-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-09-28 |
Time |
16:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-09-22 |
Time |
10:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-09-23 10:29:47 | RESUB ROUTED TO TKLARGE |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-08-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-08-17 |
Time |
19:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-08-09 |
Time |
10:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-08-10 10:32:19 | RESUB ROUTED TO TKLARGE |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-06-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
vperez |
Date |
2016-06-17 |
Time |
11:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
vperez |
Date |
2016-06-17 |
Time |
11:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-05-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-05-06 |
Time |
11:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-04-05 |
Time |
09:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-02-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-02-18 |
Time |
13:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-01-11 |
Time |
11:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-03-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-03-29 |
Time |
10:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-03-29 |
Time |
10:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-03-29 10:13:47 | $10,003.08 PAID. MU-2016-024060. |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-03-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-03-19 |
Time |
08:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-03-19 |
Time |
08:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-03-20 08:11:59 | EXPIRED? |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-09-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-09-28 |
Time |
17:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-09-28 |
Time |
17:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-09-28 17:24:12 | 1- BRING PLANS TO PALM BEACH COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD.) | | FOR IMPACT FEES ASSESSMENT. BRING BACK COUNTY STAMPED | | PLANS AND COPY OF PAID RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. COUNTY | | IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE OF THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT | | CODE. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-08-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-08-17 |
Time |
16:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-08-17 |
Time |
16:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-08-17 16:16:40 | 1- BRING PLANS TO PALM BEACH COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD.) | | FOR IMPACT FEES ASSESSMENT. BRING BACK COUNTY STAMPED | | PLANS AND COPY OF PAID RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. COUNTY | | IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE OF THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT | | CODE. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-06-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-06-15 |
Time |
14:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-06-15 |
Time |
14:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-05-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-05-05 |
Time |
15:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-05-05 |
Time |
15:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-05-05 15:17:47 | 1- AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED, BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH | | COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD.) FOR IMPACT FEES ASSESSMENT. | | BRING BACK COUNTY STAMPED PLANS AND COPY OF PAID | | RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. COUNTY IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE OF | | THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-02-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-02-17 |
Time |
09:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-02-17 |
Time |
09:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-02-17 09:42:39 | 1- AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED, BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH | | COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD.) FOR IMPACT FEES ASSESSMENT. | | BRING BACK COUNTY STAMPED PLANS AND COPY OF PAID | | RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. COUNTY IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE OF | | THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2018-04-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-04-06 |
Time |
18:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-04-06 |
Time |
18:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-04-06 18:19:12 | PROVIDE COMPLETE AND CORRECT EQUIPMENT SIZING | | CALCULATIONS AND A/C PLANS UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. | 2018-04-06 18:18:39 | MET WITH MR. ERNEST (OWNER). HE WANTS PERMIT TO BE | | ISSUED WITH PROVISO. JG. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-03-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-03-29 |
Time |
12:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-03-29 |
Time |
12:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-03-29 12:25:03 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) SIXTH MECHANICAL | | REVIEW CHECKLIST. | | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | NOTE: | | BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO | | MEANS CONTRACTOR WILL SUBMIT REQUIRED INFORMATION AFTER | | THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID | | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES APPLY. CONTRACTOR TO | | ADVICE IF PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED AT THIS TIME OR | | IF RE-SUBMITTING REQUIRED INFORMATION BEFORE PERMIT | | ISSUANCE. | | | | | | 1- IT LOOKS LIKE THE EQUIPMENT MAY BE OVERSIZED AGAIN. | | IT LOOKS LIKE THE EQUIPMENT WAS SIZED BASED ON A LARGE | | NUMBER OF PEOPLE. 35 PEOPLE IS A LARGE QUANTITY FOR A | | SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. EQUIPMENT CAN NOT BE SIZED | | BASED ON OTHER FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT THE EQUIPMENT | | SIZING. REVISE CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED TO MATCH ACTUAL | | DESIGN CONDITIONS REQUIRED BY SEC. R403.6.1 FBC-ENERGY | | CONSERVATION. NOTE: COORDINATE DRAWING M.1 WITH REVISED | | EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 2- EQUIPMENT SHOWN ON A/C PLAN DOESN'T MATCH EQUIPMENT | | SHOWN ON THE AHRI CERTIFICATES SUBMITTED. REVISE AS | | REQUIRED TO MATCH. NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM #1 ABOVE. | | SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH | | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | ***PLEASE REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY REVISED DRAWING. DON'T | | STAPLE OLD COPY TO THE PLANS. SUBMIT OLD COPIES FOR | | REFERENCE. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | JULIO GOMEZ | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | (561)805-6712 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2018-03-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-03-19 |
Time |
08:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2018-03-19 |
Time |
08:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2018-03-20 08:12:16 | EXPIRED? |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-09-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-09-28 |
Time |
16:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-09-28 |
Time |
16:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-09-28 16:48:13 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) FIFTH MECHANICAL | | REVIEW CHECKLIST. | | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | | | 1- IT LOOKS LIKE THE EQUIPMENT MAY BE OVERSIZED AGAIN. | | IT LOOKS LIKE THE EQUIPMENT WAS SIZED BASED ON A LARGE | | NUMBER OF PEOPLE. 35 PEOPLE IS A LARGE QUANTITY FOR A | | SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. EQUIPMENT CAN NOT BE SIZED | | BASED ON OTHER FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT THE EQUIPMENT | | SIZING. REVISE CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED TO MATCH ACTUAL | | DESIGN CONDITIONS REQUIRED BY SEC. R403.6.1 FBC-ENERGY | | CONSERVATION. NOTE: COORDINATE DRAWING M.1 WITH REVISED | | EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH | | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | ***PLEASE REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY REVISED DRAWING. DON'T | | STAPLE OLD COPY TO THE PLANS. SUBMIT OLD COPIES FOR | | REFERENCE. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | JULIO GOMEZ | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | (561)805-6712 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-08-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-08-17 |
Time |
18:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-08-17 |
Time |
16:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-08-17 18:26:32 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) FOURTH MECHANICAL | | REVIEW CHECKLIST. | | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | | | ***NOTE: | | MECHANICAL REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO | | MEANS THAT PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED AND THE REQUIRED | | INFORMATION MAY BE SUBMITTED AFTER THE PERMIT IS | | ISSUED. REVISION FEES APPLY. REQUIRED INFORMATION TO BE | | SUBMITTED PRIOR TO INSPECTIONS TO AVOID CONFLICTS OR | | DELAYS. CONTRACTOR TO ADVICE IN WRITING IF PROVISO | | OPTION IS PREFERRED AT THIS TIME. | | | | | | | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | 1- THE EQUIPMENT SIZE FOR UNITS 1 AND 2 IS OVERSIZED. | | ACCORDING TO SEC. R403.6.1.1 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, | | THE EQUIPMENT CAN NOT BE MORE THAN 1.15 TIMES GREATER | | THAN THE TOTAL CALCULATED LOAD OR CLOSEST AVAILABLE | | SIZE. TOTAL COOLING LOADS ARE 27531 BTU'S AND 27192 | | BTU'S. THE CLOSES SIZE IS 2-1/2 TON NOT 3 TON. REVISE | | AS REQUIRED INCLUDING SHEET M.1. | | | | RESPONSE: | | REPEAT COMMENT. TOTAL COOLING LOADS SUBMITTED NOW ARE | | 26144 BTU'S AND 26736 BTU'S. THE CLOSES SIZE IS 2-1/2 | | TON NOT 3 TON. REVISE AS REQUIRED INCLUDING SHEET M.1. | | | | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH | | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | ***PLEASE REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY REVISED DRAWING. DON'T | | STAPLE OLD COPY TO THE PLANS. SUBMIT OLD COPIES FOR | | REFERENCE. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | JULIO GOMEZ | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | (561)805-6712 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-06-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-06-15 |
Time |
15:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-06-15 |
Time |
15:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-06-15 15:19:18 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) THIRD MECHANICAL | | REVIEW CHECKLIST. | | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | 1- EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS NEED TO COMPLY WITH | | THE EQUIPMENT SIZING SECTION R403.6.1 FBC-ENERGY | | CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). CALCULATIONS NEED TO | | BE DONE USING AN APPROVED SOFTWARE (FOR EXAMPLE ELITE, | | WRIGHTSOFT, ETC). NEED CALCULATIONS BASED ON THE | | BUILDING LOADS FOR THE DIRECTIONAL ORIENTATION OF THE | | BUILDING. AND, NEED TO BE DONE BASED ON THE INTERIOR | | DESIGN DESIGN TEMPERATURE REQUIRED BY SEC. R302.1 OF | | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE NOT DONE WITH AN APPROVED | | SOFTWARE AND THE INTERIOR DESIGN TEMPERATURE DOESN'T | | COMPLY WITH SEC. R302.1. | | | | RESPONSE: | | EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: | | A) CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE DONE BASE ON THE ACTUAL | | ORIENTATION OF THE BUILDING AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | R403.6.1 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). | | CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED DON'T MATCH ACTUAL BUILDING | | ORIENTATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED. NOTE: COORDINATE WITH | | THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ONCE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | ARE REVISED. SEE BUILDING COMMENTS FOR ENERGY | | CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED. | | | | B) THE EQUIPMENT SIZE FOR UNITS 1 AND 2 IS OVERSIZED. | | ACCORDING TO SEC. R403.6.1.1 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, | | THE EQUIPMENT CAN NOT BE MORE THAN 1.15 TIMES GREATER | | THAN THE TOTAL CALCULATED LOAD OR CLOSEST AVAILABLE | | SIZE. TOTAL COOLING LOADS ARE 27531 BTU'S AND 27192 | | BTU'S. THE CLOSES SIZE IS 2-1/2 TON NOT 3 TON. REVISE | | AS REQUIRED INCLUDING SHEET M.1. | | | | | | ORIGINAL COMMENT: | | 2- MECHANICAL PLAN M.1 SUBMITTED; | | A) SIZE OF "TRANSFER DUCTS" SHOWN ON THE SECOND FLOOR | | BEDROOMS DON'T COMPLY WITH THE BALANCED RETURN AIR SEC. | | M1602.4 OF FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). SHOW | | COMPLIANCE. (REPEAT COMMENT). THE TRANSFER DUCT SIZE | | WAS NOT REVISED. IN ADDITION THE CFM'S SHOWN ON PLANS | | DON'T MATCH CFM SHOWN ON THE EQUIPMENT SIZING | | CALCULATIONS. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. | | NOTE: INFORMATION WAS CHANGED ON THE FIRST FLOOR. THE | | TRANSFER DUCTS NEED TO COMPLY WITH THE BALANCED RETURN | | AIR SEC. M1602.4. ALSO, COORDINATE CFM'S WITH EQUIPMENT | | SIZING CALCULATIONS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | RESPONSE: | | SIZE OF MASTER BEDROOM #2 TRANSFER DUCT NEEDS TO BE | | REVISED TO COMPLY. | | | | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH | | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | ***PLEASE REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY REVISED DRAWING. DON'T | | STAPLE OLD COPY TO THE PLANS. SUBMIT OLD COPIES FOR | | REFERENCE. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | JULIO GOMEZ | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | (561)805-6712 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-05-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-05-06 |
Time |
09:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-05-06 |
Time |
09:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-05-06 09:45:41 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) SECOND MECHANICAL | | REVIEW CHECKLIST. | | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | 1- EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS NEED TO COMPLY WITH | | THE EQUIPMENT SIZING SECTION R403.6.1 FBC-ENERGY | | CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). CALCULATIONS NEED TO | | BE DONE USING AN APPROVED SOFTWARE (FOR EXAMPLE ELITE, | | WRIGHTSOFT, ETC). NEED CALCULATIONS BASED ON THE | | BUILDING LOADS FOR THE DIRECTIONAL ORIENTATION OF THE | | BUILDING. AND, NEED TO BE DONE BASED ON THE INTERIOR | | DESIGN DESIGN TEMPERATURE REQUIRED BY SEC. R302.1 OF | | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE NOT DONE WITH AN APPROVED | | SOFTWARE AND THE INTERIOR DESIGN TEMPERATURE DOESN'T | | COMPLY WITH SEC. R302.1. | | | | 2- MECHANICAL PLAN M.1 SUBMITTED; | | A) SIZE OF "TRANSFER DUCTS" SHOWN ON THE SECOND FLOOR | | BEDROOMS DON'T COMPLY WITH THE BALANCED RETURN AIR SEC. | | M1602.4 OF FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). SHOW | | COMPLIANCE. (REPEAT COMMENT). THE TRANSFER DUCT SIZE | | WAS NOT REVISED. IN ADDITION THE CFM'S SHOWN ON PLANS | | DON'T MATCH CFM SHOWN ON THE EQUIPMENT SIZING | | CALCULATIONS. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. | | NOTE: INFORMATION WAS CHANGED ON THE FIRST FLOOR. THE | | TRANSFER DUCTS NEED TO COMPLY WITH THE BALANCED RETURN | | AIR SEC. M1602.4. ALSO, COORDINATE CFM'S WITH EQUIPMENT | | SIZING CALCULATIONS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | B) CLARIFY HOW THE RETURN AREA GRILLS SHOWN ON THE | | FIRST FLOOR BY THE DINING AREA AND ON THE SECOND FLOOR | | BY THE ATTIC ACCESS ARE CONNECTED TO THE AIR HANDLER | | UNIT. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. (REPEAT COMMENT). | | THE MECHANICAL PLAN WAS NOT REVISED. | | | | | | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH | | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | ***PLEASE REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY REVISED DRAWING. DON'T | | STAPLE OLD COPY TO THE PLANS. SUBMIT OLD COPIES FOR | | REFERENCE. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | JULIO GOMEZ | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | (561)805-6712 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-02-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-02-18 |
Time |
13:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-02-18 |
Time |
13:42 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2016-02-18 13:47:45 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3) MECHANICAL REVIEW | | COMMENTS. | | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). | | | | 1- EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: | | ENGINEER WHO PREPARED THE CALCULATIONS TO PROVIDE HIS | | NAME AND ALL HIS INFORMATION AND TO PROVIDE ORIGINAL | | SEAL AND SIGNATURE AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 FL. ST. | | | | 2- MECHANICAL PLAN M.1 SUBMITTED; | | A) SIZE OF "TRANSFER DUCTS" SHOWN ON THE SECOND FLOOR | | BEDROOMS DON'T COMPLY WITH THE BALANCED RETURN AIR SEC. | | M1602.4 OF FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). SHOW | | COMPLIANCE. | | | | B) CLARIFY HOW THE RETURN AREA GRILLS SHOWN ON THE | | FIRST FLOOR BY THE DINING AREA AND ON THE SECOND FLOOR | | BY THE ATTIC ACCESS ARE CONNECTED TO THE AIR HANDLER | | UNIT. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. | | | | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH | | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | ***PLEASE REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY REVISED DRAWING. DON'T | | STAPLE OLD COPY TO THE PLANS. SUBMIT OLD COPIES FOR | | REFERENCE. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT | | JULIO GOMEZ | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2018-03-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2018-03-07 |
Time |
11:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2018-03-07 |
Time |
11:44 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-09-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-09-26 |
Time |
02:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-09-26 |
Time |
01:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-09-26 02:05:26 | 1) THERE WAS ONLY ONE SET OF PLANS IN THE RESUBMITTAL | | PACKAGE. SUBMIT TWO SETS OF PLANS FOR REVIEW. WPB | | AMEND. TO FBC SEC.107.1. | | 2) THE WATER HEATER ON SHT. E.1 IS STILL SHOWN AS 50 | | GALLONS. CORRECT IT TO READ 70 GALS. | | 3) THE WATER HEATER DETAIL ON SHT. P.1 REFERS TO THE | | 2010 FBC. REVISE NOTE TO READ 2014 FBC. | | | | TIM LARGE | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6692 | | [email protected] | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-08-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-08-11 |
Time |
12:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-08-11 |
Time |
11:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-08-11 12:12:11 | 1) THE PLANS SHOW A 50 GALLON TANK TYPE WATER HEATER | | AND THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS CALL OUT A 70 GALLON WATER | | HEATER. A TANKLESS WATER HEATER IS ALSO SHOWN IN THE | | GARAGE. CLARIFY. SEE SHEETS S.2, E.1. ON SHT. P.1 I | | CANNOT TELL WHAT THE CAPACITY OF THE WATER HEATER | | IS.2ND REQUEST | | 2) THE WATER HEATER SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM EFFICIENCIES | | OF TABLE C404.2 IN CHAPT. 4 OF THE FBC, ENERGY | | CONSERVATION FOR THE TYPE OF EQUIPMENT INSTALLED. | | SUBMIT THE CORRECT EF RATING.2ND REQUEST. | | 3) CORRECT THE PLANS TO COMPLY WITH THE ENERGY | | CALCULATIONS. | | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | TIM LARGE | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | 561-805-6692 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-06-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-06-16 |
Time |
11:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-06-16 |
Time |
10:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-06-16 11:58:21 | 1) THE PLANS SHOW A 50 GALLON TANK TYPE WATER HEATER | | AND THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS CALL OUT A 70 GALLON WATER | | HEATER. A TANKLESS WATER HEATER IS ALSO SHOWN IN THE | | GARAGE. CLARIFY. | | 2) THE WATER HEATER SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM EFFICIENCIES | | OF TABLE C404.2 IN CHAPT. 4 OF THE FBC, ENERGY | | CONSERVATION FOR THE TYPE OF EQUIPMENT INSTALLED. | | SUBMIT THE CORRECT EF RATING. | | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | TIM LARGE | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | 561-805-6692 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-04-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2016-04-27 |
Time |
13:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2016-04-27 |
Time |
13:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-04-27 13:47:24 | 2ND REVIEW: FBC 2014 | | | | GEORGE JOHNSON | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6711 | | [email protected] | | | | PLUMBING COMMENTS: | | 1.MISSING P-1 IN PLAN SET WPB AMEND. TOFBC SEC. 107.2.1 |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-01-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-01-19 |
Time |
05:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-01-19 |
Time |
05:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-01-19 05:52:11 | 1) THE PLANS SHOW A 50 GALLON TANK TYPE WATER HEATER | | AND THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS CALL OUT AN EXTERIOR GAS | | TANKLESS WATER HEATER. CLARIFY. | | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | TIM LARGE | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | 561-805-6692 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-05-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-05-06 |
Time |
09:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-05-06 |
Time |
09:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-05-06 09:29:57 | METAL ROOF NOA 12-0814.10. JG. |
|
|
Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-02-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-02-18 |
Time |
13:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2016-02-18 |
Time |
13:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-02-18 13:41:57 | 1- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY THE METAL ROOF | | FASTENING FOR ALL ROOF ZONES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | 107.2.1.2 OF CITY AMENDMENTS. | | NOTE: CLEARLY IDENTIFY APPROVED ASSEMBLY ON METAL ROOF | | NOA 13-0114.03 SUBMITTED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. ALSO, SEE LIMITATION #2 ON | | PAGE 7 OF 9 OF NOA SUBMITTED. COORDINATE WITH REVISED | | DESIGN PRESSURES REQUIRED BY ITEM #2 ABOVE. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-06-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
nwier |
Date |
2016-06-13 |
Time |
10:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
njwira |
Date |
2016-06-13 |
Time |
10:49 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-05-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
ajones |
Date |
2016-05-06 |
Time |
11:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
ajones |
Date |
2016-05-06 |
Time |
11:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-05-06 11:14:52 | LANDSCAPE PEMIT REQUIRED PRIOR TO CO |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-01-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
sgraham |
Date |
2016-01-22 |
Time |
15:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
sgraham |
Date |
2016-01-22 |
Time |
15:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-01-22 15:58:18 | 1/22/16 ZONING FAILED | | | | 1. SUBMIT TWO CERTIFIED UP TO DATE SURVEYS AND SITE | | PLANS. | | 2. DRAWING MUST BE TO SCALE IN ORDER TO DETERMINE THE | | HEIGHT OF THE ROOF |
|
|