City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Permit 15090732

Plan Review Stops For Permit 15090732

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	2016-02-05		Cont ID
Sent By	jwitmer			Date	2016-02-05	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jwitmer			Date	2016-02-05	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	2015-12-14			Cont ID
Sent By	jwitmer			Date	2015-12-14	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	jwitmer			Date	2015-12-10	Time	16:38	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	E			ELECTRICAL
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	2016-03-14			Cont ID
Sent By	albarran			Date	2016-03-14	Time	14:20	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	albarran			Date	2016-03-14	Time	12:33	Sent To	I

Notes

2016-03-14 14:21:07	ALL PREVIOUS;Y MENTIONED DEFICIENCIES HAVE BEEN
	SATISFACTORILY CORRECTED.

Review Stop	E			ELECTRICAL
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	2016-02-24			Cont ID
Sent By	albarran			Date	2016-02-24	Time	14:15	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	albarran			Date	2016-02-23	Time	17:14	Sent To

Notes

2016-02-24 14:22:58	2ND ELECTRICAL REVIEW NOTES FOR REVISION #:15090732
	REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH:
	FBC 2010 EDITION
	NFPA 70 2008 (NEC)

	CORRECTIONS REQUIRED:
	IN FOLLOWING YOUR RESPONSE LETTER ON THE ELECTRICAL
	REVIEW COMMENTS OF THE PREVIOUS REVIEW, BELOW IS A LIST
	OF ITEMS THAT REQUIRE FURTHER EXPLANATION OR ACTION.
	THESE WILL BE NUMBERED AS IN THE INITIAL REVIEW BECAUSE
	THEY ARE NOT NEW COMMENTS BUT PREVIOUS COMMENTS NOT
	PROPERLY ADDRESSED.
	1. COMMENT #3 DEALING WITH THE SHOW WINDOW OUTLETS. NEC
	210.62 REQUIRES THAT THERE BE AN OUTLET WITHIN 18" OF
	THE TOP OF THE WINDOW FOR EVERY 12' OF WINDOW OR MAJOR
	PORTION THEREOF. IT DOESN'T MEAN THAT IF YOU HAVE TWO
	6' WINDOWS A SINGLE OUTLET WILL DO. YOU SHALL HAVE AN
	OUTLET WITHIN 18" OF THE TOP OF EACH WINDOW.
	2. COMMENT #6 DEALING WITH THE "WEATHER RESISTANT"
	RECEPTACLES. NEC 406.8(B) REQUIRES THAT ALL RECEPTACLES
	IN WET LOCATIONS BE IN ADDITION TO THE WEATHER-PROOF
	ENCLOSURE, ALSO BE LISTED AS WEATHER-RESISTANT "WR".
	3. COMMENT #7 DEALS WITH THE DEDICATED SIGN OUTLET. NEC
	600.5 REQUIRES THAT THERE BE IN AN ACCESSIBLE LOCATION
	A DEDICATED OUTLET FOR SIGNAGE AT EVERY PEDESTRIAN
	ENTRY DOOR.
	4. COMMENT #8 EMERGENCY AND EXIT LIGHTS. THE EMERGENCY
	LIGHTING AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM
	STANDARDS. IN ADDITION TO EMERGENCY LIGHTING, AN EXIT
	LIGHT IS MISSING TO INDICATE THE REAR EXIT CORRIDOR AS
	THAT SIGN ABOVE THE DOOR IS NOT VISIBLE FROM LOCATIONS
	WITHIN THE PREMISES.
	5. COMMENT #9 CONTINUES TO DEAL WITH THE EMERGENCY AND
	EXIT LIGHTS. NEC 700.12 REQUIRES THAT EMERGENCY LIGHTS
	BE ON THE SAME CIRCUIT AS THE LIGHTING OF THE AREA
	WHICH THEY OCCUPY. WHETHER AHEAD OF THE SWITCH OR NOT
	DOES NOT INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH CODE. MARK ON THE
	PLANS THE LIGHTING CIRCUIT USED TO POWER THE EMERGENCY
	LIGHTS WHEN THEY ARE INCORPORATED INTO THE PLANS.
	6. COMMENT #10 ASKS FOR DEFINITION OF THE FEEDER
	CONDUCTORS OF THE RISER DIAGRAM. ACCORDING TO YOUR LOAD
	CALCS FOR PANEL B, THE CONNECTED LOAD IS 152 AMP. PER
	NEC 310.15 THE AMPACITY OF THE #2 CONDUCTOR IS ONLY 115
	AMP. THE SAME APPLIES TO THE CONDUCTORS FOR PANEL A.
	CONNECTED LOAD OF 291 AMP FEED WITH A 3/0 CONDUCTOR
	LISTED FOR ONLY 200 AMP. THIS IS ALL ASSUMING THAT YOU
	ARE USING COPPER CONDUCTORS WITH 75 DEGREE INSULATION
	WHICH AGAIN IS NOT DEFINED. PER NEC 220.88, THE
	CONNECTED LOADS OF BOTH PANELS (160 KW) BEING <200 KW
	FOR A NOT ALL ELECTRIC RESTAURANT BE CONSIDERED AT 100
	DEMAND. THEREFORE 160 KW @ 208 V. 3? HAS A CONNECTED
	LOAD VALUE OF 443 AMP. MAIN FEEDER CONDUCTORS SHALL BE
	SIZED ACCORDINGLY.
	7. COMMENT #11 ENERGY CODE REQUIREMENTS. IN ADDITION TO
	THE LIGHTING POWER DENSITY ALLOWANCES THE FBC-ENERGY
	CONSERVATION SECTION HAS MANDATORY SWITCHING & LIGHTING
	CONTROL REQUIREMENTS WHICH SHALL BE ADDRESSED ON THE
	PLANS.
	8. COMMENT #12 FIXTURE SCHEDULE. INCLUDE IN THE FIXTURE
	SCHEDULE THE TYPE AND LABEL DESIGNATOR FOR THE PROPOSED
	EMERGENCY LIGHTING FIXTURE AND/OR NIGHT LIGHT FIXTURE.

	WHEN RESUBMITTING, FOR A QUICKER RETURN ON YOUR
	RE-SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER
	(NARRATIVE) ADDRESSING EACH ITEM AND THE PAGE NUMBER
	WHERE THE CORRECTIONS APPEAR ALONG WITH THE STANDARD
	CITY RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT
	CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. MARK VOID
	AND LEAVE THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS FOR
	COMPARATIVE REVIEW. CLOUDING THE CHANGES WILL BE
	GREATLY APPRECIATED.

	IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO
	CONTACT ME DIRECTLY.

	THANK YOU,
	MIKE ALBARRAN
	ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER
	PH: 561-805-6746
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	E			ELECTRICAL
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2015-12-30			Cont ID
Sent By	albarran			Date	2015-12-30	Time	13:47	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	albarran			Date	2015-12-30	Time	11:27	Sent To	I

Notes

2015-12-30 13:53:44	THE PLANS FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED REVISION HAS BEEN
	REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE EDITION OF THE NEC,
	(NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE), FIRE CODES AND THE FBC,
	(FLORIDA BUILDING CODE) AS WELL AS THE CITY OF WEST
	PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF
	SUBMITTAL. BELOW IS A LIST OF THE DEFICIENCIES NOTED.

	1. CLEARLY DEFINE YOUR SCOPE OF WORK ON BOTH, THE
	REVISION FORM AND PLANS. THEY MUST MATCH.
	2. NEC 210.8 REQUIRES THAT ALL RECEPTACLES IN KITCHENS,
	BATHROOMS AND ROOFTOPS BE GFCI PROTECTED.
	3. NEC 210.62. AT LEAST ONE RECEPTACLE OUTLET SHALL BE
	INSTALLED WITHIN 18? OF THE TOP OF A SHOW WINDOW FOR
	EVERY 12 LINEAR FT. OR MAJOR PORTION THEREOF AREA
	MEASURED HORIZONTALLY. BASED ON THE MEASURED SHOW
	WINDOW FOOTAGE ON THE PLANS, YOU SHALL ADD AN
	ADDITIONAL SHOW WINDOW OUTLET FOR BOTH THE DOWNSTAIRS
	WINDOW AS WELL AS THE UPSTAIRS.
	4. NEC 314.27(A) LUMINAIRE OUTLETS. BOXES USED AT
	LUMINAIRE OR LAMPHOLDER OUTLETS IN A CEILING SHALL BE
	REQUIRED TO SUPPORT A LUMINAIRE WEIGHING A MINIMUM OF
	50 LB. ADD THIS TO THE NOTES ON CEILING OUTLETS.
	5. NEC 314.27(D) PADDLE FANS. BOXES USED FOR THE SOLE
	SUPPORT OF CEILING FANS SHALL BE MARKED BY THE
	MANUFACTURER AS SUITABLE FOR THE PURPOSE, AND INDICATE
	THE WEIGHT LIMITATIONS BUT SHALL NOT BE USED TO SUPPORT
	PADDLE FANS HEAVIER THAN 70 LBS.
	6. NEC 406.8(B), RECEPTACLES OUTDOORS OR EXPOSED TO THE
	WEATHER SHALL BE LISTED WEATHER-RESISTANT ?WR?.
	7. NEC 600.5 REQUIRED BRANCH CIRCUIT. EACH COMMERCIAL
	BUILDING AND EACH COMMERCIAL OCCUPANCY ACCESSIBLE TO
	PEDESTRIANS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AT LEAST ONE 20 AMP
	DEDICATED OUTLET IN AN ACCESSIBLE LOCATION AT EACH
	ENTRANCE TO EACH TENANT SPACE FOR SIGN OR OUTLINE
	LIGHTING. SERVICE HALLWAYS OR CORRIDORS SHALL NOT BE
	CONSIDERED ACCESSIBLE TO PEDESTRIANS.
	8. REVISE YOUR PLANS TO INCLUDE THE REQUIRED EMERGENCY
	AND EXIT LIGHTING.
	9. NEC 700.12 (F) (4) - EMERGENCY LIGHTING SHALL BE FED
	BY LIGHTING CIRCUIT OF SAME LOCAL AREA. *IF 3 OR MORE
	LIGHTING CIRCUITS SUPPLY THE AREA, EM LIGHTS MAY BE ON
	OWN CIRCUIT.
	10. REDEFINE THE FEEDERS BETWEEN THE METER AND THE
	FIRST DISCONNECT. INCLUDE CONDUCTOR INSULATION &
	RACEWAY SIZING.
	11. FBC-E 505 HAS SPECIFIC MANDATORY ELECTRICAL POWER
	AND LIGHTING SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS WHICH SHALL BE
	ADHERED TO.
	12. THE FIXTURE SCHEDULE AS SUBMITTED REFERS TO A NOTE
	3 NOT IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS.
	13. PROVIDE A FIXTURE SCHEDULE AS REQUIRED ALONG WITH
	THE REQUIRED LIGHT DENSITY CHART TO SHOW COMPLIANCE.

	WHEN RESUBMITTING, FOR A QUICKER RETURN ON YOUR
	RE-SUBMITTAL, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
	LETTER (NARRATIVE) ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE
	STANDARD CITY RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE
	INSERT CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. MARK
	VOID AND LEAVE THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS FOR
	COMPARATIVE REVIEW. CLOUDING THE CHANGES WILL BE
	GREATLY APPRECIATED.

	IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO
	CONTACT ME DIRECTLY.

	THANK YOU,
	MIKE ALBARRAN
	ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER
	PH: 561-805-6746
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	2016-01-29			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	2016-01-29	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	2016-01-29	Time	10:21	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2015-11-25			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	2015-11-25	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	2015-11-25	Time	10:51	Sent To

Notes

2015-11-25 11:24:41	THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE
	MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. A FIRE SPRINKLER PLAN SCHEMATIC IS NOT PROVIDED,
	SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED

	2. A FIRE ALARM SCHEMATIC IS NOT PROVIDED, SEPARATE
	SHOP DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED

	3. A STAIR AND RAILING DETAIL IS NOT PROVIDED FOR
	EITHER STAIR.

	4. ALL EXIT SIGN LOCATIONS ARE NOT PROVIDED.

	5. EMERGENCY LIGHT LOCATIONS ARE NOT PROVIDED.

	6. A DOOR SCHEDULE, INCLUDING HARDWARE, EXIT HARDWARE,
	FRAME TYPE, FIRE RATING, LOCKING MECHANISM, IS NOT
	PROVIDED.

	7. FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS ARE NOT PROVIDED.

	8. PROVIDE A NOTE: ALL COOKING EQUIPMENT SHALL COMPLY
	WITH NFPA 96, INCLUDING VENTILATION AND SUPPRESSION
	SYSTEMS, UNDER SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED.

	9. AT THE 1ST FLOOR EXIT CORRIDOR, THE KITCHEN DOOR AND
	THE TWO DOUBLE DOORS OPEN INTO THE CORRIDOR AND
	ENCROUCH INTO THE EXIT CORRIDOR. NO DIMENSIONS ARE
	PROVIDED.

	NFPA 101 CHAPTER 7, MEANS OF EGRESS

	7.2.1.4.3 DOOR LEAF ENCROACHMENT
	7.2.1.4.3.1 DURING ITS SWING, ANY DOOR LEAF IN A MEANS
	OF EGRESS SHALL LEAVE NOT LESS THAN ONE-HALF OF THE
	REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, A CORRIDOR, A PASSAGEWAY,
	OR A LANDING UNOBSTRUCTED AND SHALL NOT PROJECT NOT
	MORE THAN 7 IN. INTO THE REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, A
	CORRIDOR, A PASSAGE WAY, OR A LANDING, WHEN FULLY OPEN,
	UNLESS BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET:
	(1) THE DOOR OPENING PROVIDES ACCESS TO A STAIR IN AN
	EXISTING BUILDING.
	(2) THE DOOR OPENING MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS THAT LIMITS
	PROJECTION TO NOT MORE THAN 7 IN. INTO THE REQUIRED
	WIDTH OF THE STAIR LANDING WHEN THE DOOR LEAF IS FULLY
	OPEN.

	PROVIDE DIMESNIONS INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE
	OR PROVIDE ALTERNATIVE DOOR OPTIONS.

Review Stop	G			GAS REVIEW
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	2016-11-02			Cont ID
Sent By	tklarge			Date	2016-03-12	Time	14:25	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tklarge			Date	2016-03-03	Time	14:25	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	HIST			HISTORICAL
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	2016-02-29			Cont ID
Sent By	aaponte			Date	2016-02-29	Time	14:51	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	aaponte			Date	2016-02-29	Time	14:51	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	HIST			HISTORICAL
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2015-12-22			Cont ID
Sent By	fmittner			Date	2015-12-22	Time	16:19	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	fmittner			Date	2015-12-22	Time	16:19	Sent To

Notes

2015-12-22 16:19:55	NO ELEVATION PROVIDED. FRIEDERIKE MITTNER, 822-1457

Review Stop	I			INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	4	Status	N	Date	2016-03-14			Cont ID
Sent By	albarran			Date	2016-03-14	Time	14:22	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	albarran			Date	2016-03-03	Time	12:52	Sent To

Notes

2016-03-14 14:23:53	3/14/16 PASSED LAST OF ALL REVIEWS, ARCHITECT NOTIFIED
	IN LIEU OF CONTRACTOR, SENT FILE TO LARGE READY BIN
	"W". MA
2016-03-03 12:52:29	C09

Review Stop	I			INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	3	Status	N	Date	2016-02-29			Cont ID
Sent By	lmarchan			Date	2016-02-29	Time	15:10	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	lmarchan			Date	2016-01-26	Time	08:49	Sent To

Notes

2016-01-27 08:50:16

C08

Review Stop	I			INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	2	Status	N	Date	2015-12-30			Cont ID
Sent By	albarran			Date	2015-12-30	Time	13:57	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	albarran			Date	2015-11-17	Time	10:28	Sent To

Notes

2015-12-30 13:57:06	12/30/15 FAILED THE LAST OF THE TRADE REVIEWS AND IS
	READY FOR RESUBMITTAL. CONTACTED MEGAN VIA PHONE CALL
	AND SENT FILE TO SMALL DENIED BIN "W". MA
2015-11-18 10:29:55	C04

Review Stop	I			INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No	1	Status	N	Date	2015-09-18			Cont ID
Sent By	tklarge			Date	2015-09-18	Time	11:08	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tklarge			Date	2015-09-17	Time	11:03	Sent To

Notes

2015-09-17 11:03:16

REVISION ROUTED TO TKLARGE

Review Stop	M			MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	2016-03-14			Cont ID
Sent By	ccole			Date	2016-03-10	Time	13:42	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	ccole			Date	2016-03-10	Time	11:41	Sent To

Notes

2016-03-10 11:44:11	MECHANICAL PROVISO
	3/10/16

	1) WIND LOAD ENGINEERING FOR TIE DOWN AND ATTACHMENT OF
	THE CU, RTU'S, CURBS AND STANDS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO
	THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR
	TO 1ST INSPECTION.
	2) VALUE INCREASE ON PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIRED FOR
	COST OF LARGER 1ST FLOOR AC SYSTEM.

	CHRISTOPHER L. COLE
	MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER
	561-805-6719
	[email protected]

Review Stop	M			MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	2016-02-05			Cont ID
Sent By	ccole			Date	2016-02-05	Time	17:03	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	ccole			Date	2016-02-05	Time	17:03	Sent To

Notes

2016-02-05 17:21:42	2ND REVIEW: FBC 2014 MECHANICAL
	PERMIT #15090732
	2/5/16

	1) THE HEAT LOAD SUMMARY ON SHEET M-1 IS INCOMPLETE AND
	SHALL BE SUBMITTED ON A SEPARATE SIGNED AND SEALED
	SUMMARY SHEET- REFER TO SECTION 503.2.1 FBC-10 ENERGY
	CONSERVATION (EXCEPTION):
	WHERE MECHANICAL SYSTEMS ARE DESIGNED BY A REGISTERED
	ENGINEER, THE ENGINEER HAS THE OPTION OF SUBMITTING A
	SIGNED AND SEALED SUMMARY SHEET TO THE BUILDING
	DEPARTMENT IN LIEU OF THE COMPLETE SIZING
	CALCULATION(S). SUCH SUMMARY SHEET SHALL INCLUDE THE
	FOLLOWING (BY ZONE):
	1. PROJECT NAME/OWNER
	2. PROJECT ADDRESS
	3. AREA IN SQUARE FEET
	4. SIZING METHOD USED
	5. OUTDOOR DRY BULB USE
	6. INDOOR DRY BULB
	7. OUTDOOR WET BULB USED
	8. GRAINS WATER (DIFFERENCE)
	9. TOTAL SENSIBLE GAIN
	10. TOTAL LATENT GAIN
	11. RELATIVE HUMIDITY
	12. TOTAL COOLING REQUIRED WITH OUTSIDE AIR
	13. TOTAL HEATING REQUIRED WITH OUTSIDE AIR
	2) UNDER THIS REVISION, PLEASE CLARIFY HOW THE THE HEAT
	LOAD HAS INCREASED FROM 131 MBH TO 230 MBH COOLING ,
	AND 35.8 TO 83 MBH HEATING WHEN THERE APPEARS TO BE NO
	APPARENT CHANGE IN THE ZONE, THE OCCUPANT LOAD, OR THE
	OUTSIDE AIR INTAKE.
	3) DUE TO THE CHANGE IN THE 1ST FLOOR AC SYSTEM, A
	REVISED ENERGY CALCULATION FORM 506-2010 MUST BE
	SUBMITTED.
	4) PROVIDE AN AIR BALANCE CALCULATION ON THE PLAN.

	CHRISTOPHER L. COLE
	MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER
	561-805-6719
	[email protected]

Review Stop	M			MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2015-11-23			Cont ID
Sent By	hmoser			Date	2015-11-23	Time	11:06	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	ccole			Date	2015-11-23	Time	10:43	Sent To

Notes

2015-11-23 11:11:39	1ST REVIEW 2010 MECHANICAL
	REVISION #15090732
	MASTER #14030818
	11/23/15

	1) REVISE THE HEAT LOAD AND AIR BALANCE CALCULATIONS TO
	INCLUDE THE NEW GAS-FIRED APPLIANCES AND EXHAUST HOOD
	IN THE NEW 1ST FLOOR KITCHEN.
	2) PLACE A NOTE ON THE PLAN INDICATING THE KITCHEN
	HOOD, THE KITCHEN HOOD FIRE SUPPRESSION, AND THE
	WALK-IN BOXES WILL BE DONE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT.
	3) CLARIFY IF A SHAFT WILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO HOUSE THE
	NEW GREASE DUCT INSTALLATION, AND PROVIDE DETAILS ON
	THE PLAN IF APPLICABLE

	CHRISTOPHER L. COLE
	MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER
	561-805-6719
	[email protected]

Review Stop	P			PLUMBING
Rev No	4	Status	P	Date	2016-03-12			Cont ID
Sent By	tklarge			Date	2016-03-12	Time	04:54	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tklarge			Date	2016-03-12	Time	03:54	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	P			PLUMBING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	2016-02-03			Cont ID
Sent By	tklarge			Date	2016-01-30	Time	11:45	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tklarge			Date	2016-01-30	Time	10:13	Sent To

Notes

2016-01-30 12:04:51	1) SHT. P-5 - THE NOTE ON THE PLAN REFERS TO GAS TABLE
	402.4 (2). THIS TABLE IS FOR A SYSTEM WITH LESS THAN 2
	PSI BUT THE PLANS ALSO NOTE THAT THE INLET PRESSURE IS
	2 PSI. WHICH IS IT? I CANNOT DO A THOROUGH REVIEW ON
	THE GAS UNLESS THE CORRECT PRESSURE AND PROPER SIZING
	TABLE ARE ON THE PLANS.
	2) SHT. P-5 - THE PLANS REFER TO THE 2007 FUEL GAS
	CODE. THE CODE IN EFFECT FOR THIS PROJECT IS THE 2010
	FBC & FUEL GAS CODE.
	3) THE GAS PLAN NOTES THE BTU LOAD IS 667K BUT MY
	CALCULATIONS ARE 906K. PLEASE CHECK YOUR CALCULATIONS.
	4) SUBMIT AN EXPANDED SANITARY RISER FOR THE SECOND
	FLOOR. IT IS EXTREMELY DIFFICULT TO SEE WHERE ONE LINE
	STOPS AND ANOTHER BEGINS.DON'T OVERLAY THE FIRST FLOOR
	RISER FOR THE GREASY WASTE WITH THE 2ND FLOOR RISER.
	SHT. P-5 - THE FIXTURES IN THE FOOD PREP AREA ARE NOT
	ON THE WATER RISER. CLARIFY.
	5) SHT. P-5- THE 2ND FLOOR WATER RISER REFERS TO THE
	3RD FLOOR. CLARIFY. WHERE IS THE WATER RISER CONNECTION
	TO THE FIRST FLOOR?
	6) SHT. P-6 - FIRST FLOOR GREASY WASTE - THE VENT IS
	MISSING FOR THE TWO FLOOR SINKS IN THE FOOD PREP ARREA.
	7) THE AIR ADMITTTANCE VALVE (STUDOR VENT) IS MISSING
	ON THE FIRST FLOOR GREASY WASTE RISER IN THE BAR AREA.
	8) IDENTIFY THE AIR ADMITTANCE VALVES ON THE 2ND FLOOR
	GREASY WASTE.
	9) SHT.P-6 - THE SECOND FLOOR GREASY WASTE STILL SHOWS
	THE ICE BINS DISCHARGING INTO THE GREASY WASTE. WASTES
	THAT DO NOT REQUIRE SEPARATION OR TREATMENT SHALL NOT
	BE DISCHARGED INTO ANY INTERCEPTOR OR SEPARATOR PER THE
	2010 FBC- PLUMBING SEC.1003.2. 3RD REQUEST.
	10) THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE GAS APPLIANCES HAVE NOT
	BEEN SUBMITTED. SUBMIT MANUF. SPECS FOR THE GAS
	EQUIPMENT.3RD REQUEST.

	PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW
	TIM LARGE
	CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR
	561-805-6692
	[email protected]

Review Stop	P			PLUMBING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	2015-11-21			Cont ID
Sent By	tklarge			Date	2015-11-21	Time	07:50	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tklarge			Date	2015-11-21	Time	06:57	Sent To

Notes

2015-11-21 07:49:57	1) SUBMIT INTERCEPTOR SIZING CALCULATIONS. THE
	INTERCEPTOR SHALL BE SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ONE OF
	THE METHODS LISTED IN THE 2010 FBC SEC.1003.3.4. 2ND
	REQUEST.
	2) SUBMIT MANUF. SPECS FOR THE ADDED GAS EQUIPMENT AND
	SUBMIT A COMPLETE GAS DRAWING FOR REVIEW.WPB AMEND. TO
	FBC SEC. 107.2.1. 2ND REQUEST
	3) SHT.P-4 - SHOWS THE DRAINS FROM ICE BINS DISCHARGING
	INTO THE GREASE INTERCEPTOR.WASTES THAT DO NOT REQUIRE
	TREATMENT OR SEPARATION SHALL NOT BE DISCHARGED INTO
	ANY INTERCEPTOR OR SEPARATOR PER 2010 FBC-PLUMBING
	SEC.1003.2. 2ND REQUEST.
	4) GREASE INTTERCEPTORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH DEVICES
	TO CONTROL THE RATE OF WATER FLOW SO THAT THE WATER
	FLOW DOES NOT EXCEED THE RATED FLOW PER FBC-PLUMBING
	SEC.1003.3.4.2. 2ND REQUEST. REFER TO THE
	MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS THAT I PRINTED
	OUT SINCE THEY WERE NOT SUBMITTED AS PREVIOUSLY
	REQUESTED.SHOW THE REQUIRED VENT ON THE RISER
	DIAGRAM.THE VENT FOR THE SERVICE SINK WILL NOT SUFFICE
	FOR THE INTERCEPTOR.
	5) SUBMIT A WATER RISER FOR REVIEW FOR THE CHANGES MADE
	TO THE WATER PIPING SYSTEM. WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC.
	107.3.5.1.3.2ND REQUEST.
	6) SUBMIT AN EXPANDED SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM. IT IS
	DIFFICULT TO SEE WHERE ONE LINE STOPS AND ANOTHER
	BEGINS. WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1.

	PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW
	TIM LARGE
	CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR
	561-805-6692
	[email protected]

Review Stop	P			PLUMBING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	2015-09-18			Cont ID
Sent By	tklarge			Date	2015-09-18	Time	11:07	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	tklarge			Date	2015-09-18	Time	04:30	Sent To

Notes

2015-09-18 08:48:07	1) SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS/INSTALL MANUAL
	FOR THE ZURN GREASE INTERCEPTOR FOR REVIEW. WPB AMEND.
	TO FBC SEC.107.2.1, 107.3.5.1.3.
	2) SUBMIT INTERCEPTOR SIZING CALCULATIONS. THE
	INTERCEPTOR SHALL BE SIZED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ONE OF
	THE METHODS LISTED IN THE 2010 FBC SEC.1003.3.4.
	3) SUBMIT A REVISED KITCHEN EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE. THE
	PLANS SHOW A NEW GRIDDLE AND FRYER BUT NO INFORMATION
	HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR THESE APPLIANCES.
	4) INDICATE ON THE PLANS IF THE GRIDDLE AND FRYER ARE
	GAS OR ELECTRIC. IF THE APPLIANCES ARE GAS, THEN SUBMIT
	MANUF. SPECS FOR THE EQUIPMENT AND SUBMIT A COMPLETE
	GAS DRAWING FOR REVIEW. IF THE APPLIANCES ARE ELECTRIC,
	SUBMIT COMPLETE ELECTRIC PLANS FOR REVIEW.WPB AMEND. TO
	FBC SEC. 107.2.1.
	5) THE PLANS FOR THIS PLUMBING REVISION SHOW CHANGES
	FRROM THE ORIGINAL PLANS THAT APPEAR TO AFFECT
	STRUCTURAL, MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL DISCIPLINES.
	SUBMIT A COMPLETE SET OF PLANS THAT REFLECTS THE ENTIRE
	SCOPE OF CHANGES THAT HAVE BEEN MADE FROM THE ORIGINAL
	PLANS. WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1.
	6) SHT.P-4 - SHOWS THE DRAINS FROM ICE BINS DISCHARGING
	INTO THE GREASE INTERCEPTOR.WASTES THAT DO NOT REQUIRE
	TREATMENT OR SEPARATION SHALL NOT BE DISCHARGED INTO
	ANY INTERCEPTOR OR SEPARATOR PER 2010 FBC-PLUMBING
	SEC.1003.2.
	7)THE GREASE INTERCEPTOR SHALL HAVE THE GREASE
	RETENTION CAPACITY INDICATED IN TABLE 1003.3.4.1 OF
	FBC-PLUMBING FOR THE FLOW THROUGH RATES INDICATED.
	8) GREASE INTTERCEPTORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH DEVICES
	TO CONTROL THE RATE OF WATER FLOW SO THAT THE WATER
	FLOW DOES NOT EXCEED THE RATED FLOW PER FBC-PLUMBING
	SEC.1003.3.4.2.
	9) INDICATE THE TYPE OF COOKING OPERATIONS THAT WILL BE
	DONE IN THE STRUCTURE.WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1.
	10) SUBMIT A WATER RISER FOR REVIEW. WPB AMEND. TO FBC
	SEC. 107.3.5.1.3.

	WHEN A COMPLETE SET OF PLANS ARE SUBMITTED THAT SHOW
	ALL THE CHANGES TO THE BUILDING, ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL
	AND PLUMBING SYSTEMS THOSE PLANS WILL BE REVIEWED BY
	EACH DISCIPLINE. THE PLANS MUST BE SUBMITTED AS A
	COMPLETE PACKAGE.

	PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW
	TIM LARGE
	CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR
	561-805-6692
	[email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	2016-02-29			Cont ID
Sent By	aaponte			Date	2016-02-29	Time	14:38	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	aaponte			Date	2016-02-29	Time	14:38	Sent To

Notes

2016-02-29 14:50:42	PROVISO: ANY NEW MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ON THE ROOF SHALL
	BE SCREENED WITH A WALL, LOUVER OR SIMILAR IN THE SAME
	HEIGHT OF THE EQUIPMENT.
	ESTABLISHMENT SHALL FOLLOW THE ALCOHOL REGULATION IN
	CHAPTER VI OF THE CITY CODE.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	2015-12-22			Cont ID
Sent By	fmittner			Date	2015-12-22	Time	16:20	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	fmittner			Date	2015-12-22	Time	16:20	Sent To	E

Notes

2015-12-22 16:20:38

ALCOHOL RESTRICTIONS APPLY.