|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 15090197
Plan Review Stops For Permit 15090197 |
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-11-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-11-17 |
Time |
15:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-11-06 |
Time |
12:07 |
Sent To |
L |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-10-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-10-29 |
Time |
11:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-10-14 |
Time |
15:46 |
Sent To |
L |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-09-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-09-28 |
Time |
16:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-09-08 |
Time |
13:28 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-11-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-11-17 |
Time |
15:41 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-11-17 |
Time |
15:40 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-10-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-10-29 |
Time |
11:44 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-10-29 |
Time |
11:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-10-29 11:21:11 | FAILED | | | | 1) THE SINGLE TRUNK ALEXANDER PALM THAT IS SHOWN IN THE | | ISLAND WITH THE STREET TREES DOES NOT COUNT TOWARD | | MEETING THE MULTIFAMILY ADDITIONAL TREES AS IT IS NOT | | ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING. STAFF IS CONFUSED WHY A | | DOUBLE TRUNK ALEXANDER OR TWO SINGLE TRUNK ALEXANDER | | PALMS WERE NOT INSTALLED ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE | | BUILDING (A SINGLE TRUNK ALEXANDER WAS SHOWN IN THIS | | LOCATION ON PREVIOUS SET OF PLANS. | | | | 2) WHILE THE STREET TREES ARE NOT DIRECTLY PART OF THIS | | PERMIT REVIEW, STAFF HAS NOTED THAT THE LIVE OAK TREE | | THAT IS REQUIRED TO TERMINATE THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE | | PARKING ROW IS NOW SHOWN IN THE NORTHERN ISLAND. THIS | | IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. THAT ISLAND CANNOT SUPPORT TREE OAK | | TREES AND THE FPL TRANSFORMER AND PERMIT THEM ADEQUATE | | LONG TERM GROWTH. IF THE CONCERN IS THE PROXIMITY OF | | THE OAK TREE TO THE TREE PRESERVE, THEN STAFF IS OPEN | | TO AN ALTERNATIVE TREE SPECIES IN THAT LOCATION ONLY. A | | TREE IS REQUIRED AT THAT LOCATION PRIOR TO THE STAFF?S | | FINAL CLOSEOUT OF OAKTON COMMONS. | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-09-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-09-28 |
Time |
16:32 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-09-28 |
Time |
16:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-09-28 16:32:29 | FAILED | | | | 1) ITALIAN CYPRESS DOES NOT MEET THE CITY'S DEFINITION | | AS A TREE AND MAY NOT BE USED TO SATISFY THE REQUIRED | | MULTIFAMILY TREE CALCULATION. | | | | 2) THE MULTIFAMILY TREE CALCULATION SHALL BE DONE PER | | BUILDING, NOT FOR BOTH BUILDINGS COMBINED. | | | | 3) THE APPROVED MASTER LANDSCAPE PLAN DID NOT ESTABLISH | | THAT FOXTAIL PALMS AND SILVER BUTTONWOOD TRESS COULD BE | | TRADED FOR ALEXANDER PALMS AS PROPOSED. STAFF WILL | | ACCEPT THE TRADE OUT ONLY IF ALL OF THE ALEXANDER PALM | | LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLAN ARE INSTALLED WITH DOUBLE | | TRUNKS. NOTE: THIS WILL ALSO RESULT IN COMPLIANCE WITH | | THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF MULTIFAMILY TREES. | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-09-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-09-28 |
Time |
16:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2015-09-28 |
Time |
16:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
 |