Plan Review Stops For Permit 15081154 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-03-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2016-03-18 |
Time |
11:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2016-03-17 |
Time |
17:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-03-18 11:48:14 | APPROVED WITH EXCEPTIONS. | | | | 1) A SEPARATE PERMIT, APPLICATION AND REVIEW OF PLANS | | FOR THE FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM REQUIRED BY | | FBC903.2.11.3.1 ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AND | | APPROVED AT A LATER DATE PER YOUR REQUEST. | | | | 2) SUBMIT TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT HAVE BEEN | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF | | WRITING FOR THE SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS, EXTERIOR DOORS | | AND WINDOWS, STRUCTURAL MULLIONS, ROOFING MATERIALS, | | ROOF TOP ATTIC VENTILATORS AND ANY OTHER PRODUCTS | | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9N-3. | | | | 3) SUBMIT A GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT WITH THE | | ENGINEER'S ORIGINAL HANDWRITTEN SIGNATURE AND SEAL. THE | | ONES SUBMITTED HAVE COPIED SIGNATURES. FAC 61G15-23.002 | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-02-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2016-02-17 |
Time |
16:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2016-02-17 |
Time |
15:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-02-17 16:41:37 | PLAN | | REVIEW COMMENTS | | | | 3RD REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | (561) 805-6714 | | [email protected] | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: | | | | 1) THE SURVEY SPECIFIES THE PROPERTY AS BEING IN FLOOD | | ZONE B WHEN IT IS ACTUALLY IN FLOOD ZONE C. IF NOT | | CORRECTED, THIS MAY RESULT IN THE HOMEOWNERS PAYING | | MORE FOR FLOOD INSURANCE. | | I DID NOT FIND THE NEW SURVEY THAT WAS REFERENCED IN | | YOUR RESPONSE LETTER IN THE RE-SUBMITTAL. TWO COPIES OF | | THE CORRECTED SURVEY ARE REQUIRED. BECAUSE THESE ARE | | FEE SIMPLE TOWNHOUSES, TWO SETS OF INDIVIDUAL SURVEYS | | FOR EACH LOT ARE REQUIRED FOR EACH UNIT. | | | | 2) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-R806.1 VENTILATION | | REQUIRED. ENCLOSED ATTICS AND ENCLOSED RAFTER SPACES | | FORMED WHERE CEILINGS ARE APPLIED DIRECTLY TO THE | | UNDERSIDE OF ROOF RAFTERS SHALL HAVE CROSS VENTILATION | | FOR EACH SEPARATE SPACE BY VENTILATING OPENINGS | | PROTECTED AGAINST THE ENTRANCE OF RAIN OR SNOW. SUBMIT | | TWO COPIES OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS AND MANUFACTURER'S | | SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 18" DIAMETER INTAKE AND EXHAUST | | ATTIC VENTS ON THE ROOF. PROVIDE INFORMATION TO SHOW | | THAT THEY WILL PROVIDE THE REQUIRED ATTIC VENTILATION. | | | | 3) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS WILL BE A PROVISO ITEM TO BE | | SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL AT A LATER DATE PRIOR | | TO INSTALLATION AS REQUESTED. FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO | | SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE | | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9N-3 THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND | | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. PROVIDE | | TWO COMPLETE PRODUCT APPROVALS WITH FL OR NOA NUMBERS | | INCLUDING INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS AND MAXIMUM DESIGN | | PRESSURES FOR EACH OF THE DIFFERENT ROOFING MATERIALS, | | WINDOW/GLASS TYPES, STRUCTURAL MULLIONS AND EXTERIOR | | DOOR TYPES (INCLUDING SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS). | | | | 4) THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM CONTAINS | | ERRORS AND IS MISSING INFORMATION. THE FORMS REQUIRE | | THE SIGNATURE OF THE OWNER/AGENT. INDICATE THE CORRECT | | ADDRESS ON THE ENERGY FORM FOR THAT SPECIFIC UNIT. | | | | 5) SHEETS 1, 2 AND 5 FROM FRANCIS ENGINEERING ( FIRE | | SPRINKLER PLANS? ) ARE MISSING. A SEPARATE PERMIT, | | APPLICATION AND REVIEW OF FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS ARE | | REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AT A LATER DATE PER YOUR | | REQUEST. | | | | 6) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME, PLEASE SUBMIT A | | RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW | | COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-12-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-12-22 |
Time |
15:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-12-21 |
Time |
17:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-12-22 15:20:04 | PLAN | | REVIEW COMMENTS | | | | 2ND REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | (561) 805-6714 | | [email protected] | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: | | | | 1) THE SURVEY SPECIFIES THE PROPERTY AS BEING IN FLOOD | | ZONE B WHEN IT IS ACTUALLY IN FLOOD ZONE C. IF NOT | | CORRECTED, THIS MAY RESULT IN THE HOMEOWNERS PAYING | | MORE FOR FLOOD INSURANCE. | | I DID NOT FIND THE NEW SURVEY THAT WAS REFERENCED IN | | YOUR RESPONSE LETTER IN THE RE-SUBMITTAL. | | | | 2) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-R806.1 VENTILATION | | REQUIRED. ENCLOSED ATTICS AND ENCLOSED RAFTER SPACES | | FORMED WHERE CEILINGS ARE APPLIED DIRECTLY TO THE | | UNDERSIDE OF ROOF RAFTERS SHALL HAVE CROSS VENTILATION | | FOR EACH SEPARATE SPACE BY VENTILATING OPENINGS | | PROTECTED AGAINST THE ENTRANCE OF RAIN OR SNOW. | | VENTILATION OPENINGS SHALL HAVE A LEAST DIMENSION OF | | 1/16 INCH MINIMUM AND 1/4 INCH MAXIMUM. VENTILATION | | OPENINGS HAVING A LEAST DIMENSION LARGER THAN 1/4 INCH | | SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH CORROSION-RESISTANT WIRE CLOTH | | SCREENING, HARDWARE CLOTH, OR SIMILAR MATERIAL WITH | | OPENINGS HAVING A LEAST DIMENSION OF 1/16 INCH MINIMUM | | AND 1/4 INCH MAXIMUM. OPENINGS IN ROOF FRAMING MEMBERS | | SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION R802.1.8. | | REQUIRED VENTILATION OPENINGS SHALL OPEN DIRECTLY TO | | THE OUTSIDE AIR. CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIRED AREA OF | | VENTILATION OPENINGS WERE ADDED TO THE PLANS. I DID NOT | | SEE THE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF THE VENT OPENINGS SHOWN | | ON THE PLANS. | | | | 3) FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS | | FOR THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9N-3 | | THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE | | DESIGNER OF RECORD. PROVIDE TWO COMPLETE PRODUCT | | APPROVALS WITH FL OR NOA NUMBERS INCLUDING INSTALLATION | | INSTRUCTIONS AND MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES FOR EACH OF | | THE DIFFERENT ROOFING MATERIALS, WINDOW/GLASS TYPES, | | STRUCTURAL MULLIONS AND EXTERIOR DOOR TYPES (INCLUDING | | SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS). | | THE FOLLOWING IS A LINK TO THE MIAMI - DADE PRODUCT | | APPROVAL WEBSITE. | | HTTP://WWW.MIAMIDADE.GOV/BUILDING/PC-SEARCH_APP.ASP | | THE FOLLOWING IS A LINK TO THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL | | WEBSITE. | | HTTPS://FLORIDABUILDING.ORG/PR/PR_APP_SRCH.ASPX | | | | 4) THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM CONTAINS | | ERRORS AND IS MISSING INFORMATION. THE FORMS REQUIRE | | THE SIGNATURE OF THE OWNER/AGENT. THE STREET IS LAKE | | AVE. AND NOT LAKE WORTH AVE. THE CITY IS WEST PALM | | BEACH AND NOT LANTANA. THE JURIDICTION NUMBER IS | | 604700. THE UNITS DO NOT MEET THE CRITERIA IN FBC | | ENERGY CONSERVATION SECTION R405.7.4 TO USE THE CROSS | | VENTILATION OPTION CREDIT. THE FORMS SPECIFY AN | | UNVENTED ATTIC AND THE PLANS SHOW A VENTILATED ATTIC. | | THE FORMS SPECIFY A CONCRETE ROOF AND THE PLANS HAVE A | | PLYWOOD ROOF WITH ASPHALT ROOFING. | | | | 5) ACCORDING TO THE DRAWING INDEX ON SHEET CV-1.0, | | SHEET A-6.0 IS MISSING. SHEETS 1-4 FROM FRANCIS | | ENGINEERING ( FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS? ) ARE ALSO MISSING. | | | | 6) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME, PLEASE SUBMIT A | | RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW | | COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | 7) THE SIGNATURE OF THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER APPEARS TO | | BE A FASCIMILE. FLORIDA STATUTES REQUIRE THAT ALL | | DRAWINGS AND DOCUMENTS FROM ENGINEERS, AS WELL AS, | | ARCHITECTS THAT ARE SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC RECORD HAVE | | THEIR HANDWRITTEN SIGNATURES ON THEM IN ADDITION TO | | THEIR SEALS. FAC 61G15-23.002 AND 61G1-16.003 | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-10-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-10-22 |
Time |
07:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-10-22 |
Time |
07:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-10-22 10:16:18 | PLAN | | REVIEW COMMENTS | | | | 1ST REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | (561) 805-6714 | | [email protected] | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: | | | | 1) THE PLANS WILL NEED TO BE DIVIDED INTO TWO SEPARATE | | SUBMITTAL PACKAGES SUCH THAT ALL OF THE DRAWINGS AND | | CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR THE 6 TOWNHOUSE UNIT A | | BUILDING ARE IN ONE AND THE DRAWINGS AND CONSTRUCTION | | DOCUMENTS FOR THE 8 TOWNHOUSE UNIT B BUILDING ARE IN | | THE OTHER. THIS WILL PROVIDE CLARIFICATION FOR RECORD | | MANAGEMENT AND HELP TO AVOID CONFUSION AND DELAYS IN | | THE FIELD DUE TO FAILED INSPECTIONS. FBC 107.2.1.4 | | | | 2) THE SURVEY SPECIFIES THE PROPERTY AS BEING IN FLOOD | | ZONE B WHEN IT IS ACTUALLY IN FLOOD ZONE C. IF NOT | | CORRECTED, THIS MAY RESULT IN THE HOMEOWNERS PAYING | | MORE FOR FLOOD INSURANCE. | | | | 3) THE FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS SHOW THE ADJACENT | | INTERIOR UNITS WITH WINDOWS ON THE ZERO LOT LINE, WHICH | | IS NOT ALLOWED. FBC-R302.1 | | | | 4) THE NOTE STATING THAT THE WINDOWS IN THE SIDE WALL | | ARE ONLY ON THE END UNITS IS MISSING FROM SHEET A-1.7 | | | | 5) PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE 2 HOUR FIRE RATED COMMON | | WALL BETWEEN DWELLING UNITS AND DETACHED GARAGES THAT | | SHOWS COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-R302.2 TOWNHOUSES. | | EACH TOWNHOUSE SHALL BE CONSIDERED A SEPARATE BUILDING | | AND SHALL BE SEPARATED BY FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED WALL | | ASSEMBLIES MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION R302.1 | | FOR EXTERIOR WALLS. EXCEPTION: A COMMON 2-HOUR | | FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED WALL ASSEMBLY TESTED IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 119 OR UL 263 IS PERMITTED FOR | | TOWNHOUSES IF SUCH WALLS DO NOT CONTAIN PLUMBING OR | | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, DUCTS OR VENTS IN THE CAVITY OF | | THE COMMON WALL, UNLESS SUCH MATERIALS AND METHODS OF | | PENETRATION COMPLY WITH SECTION R302.4. THE WALL SHALL | | BE RATED FOR FIRE EXPOSURE FROM BOTH SIDES AND SHALL | | EXTEND TO AND BE TIGHT AGAINST EXTERIOR WALLS AND THE | | UNDERSIDE OF THE ROOF SHEATHING. ELECTRICAL | | INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | CHAPTER 34. PENETRATIONS OF ELECTRICAL OUTLET BOXES | | SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION R302.4. | | | | 6) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH R302.2.4 STRUCTURAL | | INDEPENDENCE. EACH INDIVIDUAL TOWNHOUSE SHALL BE | | STRUCTURALLY INDEPENDENT. | | | | 7) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-R302.2.2 PARAPETS. | | PARAPETS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION | | R302.2.3 SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED FOR TOWNHOUSES AS AN | | EXTENSION OF EXTERIOR WALLS OR COMMON WALLS IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | 1. WHERE ROOF SURFACES ADJACENT TO THE WALL OR WALLS | | ARE AT THE SAME ELEVATION, THE PARAPET SHALL EXTEND NOT | | LESS THAN 30 INCHES ABOVE THE ROOF SURFACES. | | 2. WHERE ROOF SURFACES ADJACENT TO THE WALL OR WALLS | | ARE AT DIFFERENT ELEVATIONS AND THE HIGHER ROOF IS NOT | | MORE THAN 30 INCHES ABOVE THE LOWER ROOF, THE PARAPET | | SHALL EXTEND NOT LESS THAN 30 INCHES ABOVE THE LOWER | | ROOF SURFACE. | | EXCEPTION: A PARAPET IS NOT REQUIRED IN THE TWO CASES | | ABOVE WHEN THE ROOF IS COVERED WITH A MINIMUM CLASS C | | ROOF COVERING, AND THE ROOF DECKING OR SHEATHING IS OF | | NONCOMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS OR APPROVED | | FIRE-RETARDANT-TREATED WOOD FOR A DISTANCE OF 4 FEET ON | | EACH SIDE OF THE WALL OR WALLS, OR ONE LAYER OF | | 5/8-INCH TYPE X GYPSUM BOARD IS INSTALLED DIRECTLY | | BENEATH THE ROOF DECKING OR SHEATHING, SUPPORTED BY A | | MINIMUM OF NOMINAL 2-INCH LEDGERS ATTACHED TO THE SIDES | | OF THE ROOF FRAMING MEMBERS, FOR A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF | | 4 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF THE WALL OR WALLS AND THERE ARE | | NO OPENINGS OR PENETRATIONS IN THE ROOF WITHIN 4 FEET | | OF THE COMMON WALLS. | | 3. A PARAPET IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE ROOF SURFACES | | ADJACENT TO THE WALL OR WALLS ARE AT DIFFERENT | | ELEVATIONS AND THE HIGHER ROOF IS MORE THAN 30 INCHES | | ABOVE THE LOWER ROOF. THE COMMON WALL CONSTRUCTION FROM | | THE LOWER ROOF TO THE UNDERSIDE OF THE HIGHER ROOF DECK | | SHALL HAVE NOT LESS THAN A 1-HOUR FIRE-RESISTANCE | | RATING. THE WALL SHALL BE RATED FOR EXPOSURE FROM BOTH | | SIDES. | | | | 8) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-R302.2.3 PARAPET | | CONSTRUCTION. | | PARAPETS SHALL HAVE THE SAME FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING AS | | THAT REQUIRED FOR THE SUPPORTING WALL OR WALLS. ON ANY | | SIDE ADJACENT TO A ROOF SURFACE, THE PARAPET SHALL HAVE | | NONCOMBUSTIBLE FACES FOR THE UPPERMOST 18 INCHES, TO | | INCLUDE COUNTERFLASHING AND COPING MATERIALS. WHERE THE | | ROOF SLOPES TOWARD A PARAPET AT SLOPES GREATER THAN 2 | | UNITS VERTICAL IN 12 UNITS HORIZONTAL, THE PARAPET | | SHALL EXTEND TO THE SAME HEIGHT AS ANY PORTION OF THE | | ROOF WITHIN A DISTANCE OF 3 FEET, BUT IN NO CASE SHALL | | THE HEIGHT BE LESS THAN 30 INCHES. | | | | 9) THERE IS A NOTE ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLANS FOR | | BUILDING A THAT STATES SEE DETAIL 10/S5 FOR PLYWOOD | | NAILING PATTERN. THERE IS NO DETAIL 10 ON SHEET S5. FBC | | 107.2.1 | | | | 10) THERE IS A NOTE ON THE ROOF FRAMING PLANS FOR | | BUILDING B THAT STATES SEE DETAIL 1/S12 FOR PLYWOOD | | NAILING PATTERN. DETAIL 1 ON SHEET S12 DOES NOT PROVIDE | | THE PLYWOOD NAILING PATTERN. THE NAILING FOR THE ROOF | | SHEATHING IS SPECIFIED ON DETAIL 4 ON S15. FBC 107.2.1 | | | | 11) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-R302.5.1 OPENING | | PROTECTION. OPENINGS BETWEEN THE GARAGE AND RESIDENCE | | SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH SOLID WOOD DOORS NOT LESS THAN | | 1-3/8 INCHES IN THICKNESS, SOLID OR HONEYCOMB-CORE | | STEEL DOORS NOT LESS THAN 1-3/8 INCHES THICK, OR | | 20-MINUTE FIRE-RATED DOORS, EQUIPPED WITH A | | SELF-CLOSING DEVICE. | | | | 12) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-R302.6 DWELLING/GARAGE | | FIRE SEPARATION. THE GARAGE SHALL BE SEPARATED AS | | REQUIRED BY TABLE R302.6. OPENINGS IN GARAGE WALLS | | SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION R302.5. THIS PROVISION DOES | | NOT APPLY TO GARAGE WALLS THAT ARE PERPENDICULAR TO THE | | ADJACENT DWELLING UNIT WALL. | | | | 13) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-R311.7.8.1 HANDRAIL | | HEIGHT, MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM THE SLOPED PLANE | | ADJOINING THE TREAD NOSING, OR FINISH SURFACE OF RAMP | | SLOPE, SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 34 INCHES (864 MM) AND | | NOT MORE THAN 38 INCHES (965 MM). | | | | 14) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-R806.1 VENTILATION | | REQUIRED. ENCLOSED ATTICS AND ENCLOSED RAFTER SPACES | | FORMED WHERE CEILINGS ARE APPLIED DIRECTLY TO THE | | UNDERSIDE OF ROOF RAFTERS SHALL HAVE CROSS VENTILATION | | FOR EACH SEPARATE SPACE BY VENTILATING OPENINGS | | PROTECTED AGAINST THE ENTRANCE OF RAIN OR SNOW. | | VENTILATION OPENINGS SHALL HAVE A LEAST DIMENSION OF | | 1/16 INCH MINIMUM AND 1/4 INCH MAXIMUM. VENTILATION | | OPENINGS HAVING A LEAST DIMENSION LARGER THAN 1/4 INCH | | SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH CORROSION-RESISTANT WIRE CLOTH | | SCREENING, HARDWARE CLOTH, OR SIMILAR MATERIAL WITH | | OPENINGS HAVING A LEAST DIMENSION OF 1/16 INCH MINIMUM | | AND 1/4 INCH MAXIMUM. OPENINGS IN ROOF FRAMING MEMBERS | | SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION R802.1.8. | | REQUIRED VENTILATION OPENINGS SHALL OPEN DIRECTLY TO | | THE OUTSIDE AIR. | | | | 15) FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS | | FOR THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9N-3 | | THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE | | DESIGNER OF RECORD. PROVIDE TWO COMPLETE PRODUCT | | APPROVALS WITH FL OR NOA NUMBERS INCLUDING INSTALLATION | | INSTRUCTIONS AND MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES FOR EACH OF | | THE DIFFERENT ROOFING MATERIALS, WINDOW/GLASS TYPES, | | STRUCTURAL MULLIONS AND EXTERIOR DOOR TYPES (INCLUDING | | SECTIONAL GARAGE DOORS). | | THE FOLLOWING IS A LINK TO THE MIAMI - DADE PRODUCT | | APPROVAL WEBSITE. | | HTTP://WWW.MIAMIDADE.GOV/BUILDING/PC-SEARCH_APP.ASP | | THE FOLLOWING IS A LINK TO THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL | | WEBSITE. | | HTTPS://FLORIDABUILDING.ORG/PR/PR_APP_SRCH.ASPX | | | | 16) THE ENERGY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FORM CONTAINS | | ERRORS AND IS MISSING INFORMATION. THE FORMS REQUIRE | | THE SIGNATURE OF THE OWNER/AGENT. THE STREET IS LAKE | | AVE. AND NOT LAKE WORTH AVE. THE CITY IS WEST PALM | | BEACH AND NOT LANTANA. THE JURIDICTION NUMBER IS | | 604700. THE UNITS DO NOT MEET THE CRITERIA IN FBC | | ENERGY CONSERVATION SECTION R405.7.4 TO USE THE CROSS | | VENTILATION OPTION CREDIT. | | | | 17) THERE IS AN OVER-TYPE ERROR IN THE TITLE BLOCK OF | | SHEETS S10, S11, S12 AND S13. FBC 107.2.1 | | | | 18) SPECIFY THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION AND OCCUPANCY ON | | THE PLANS. THE CONSTRUCTION IS TYPE V-B AND TOWNHOUSES | | ARE R-3 OCCUPANCIES. FBC 601 AND FBC 302.1 | | | | 19) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME, PLEASE SUBMIT | | A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW | | COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | RE-SUBMITTAL PROCEDURE | | YOU ARE REQUIRED TO FILL OUT A RE-SUBMITTAL FORM TO BE | | SUBMITTED WITH THE CORRECTED PLANS AND/OR OTHER | | DOCUMENTS. THE PERMIT CLERK WILL RETRIEVE THE DENIED | | APPLICATION, PLANS AND OTHER DOCUMENTS FOR YOU. YOU ARE | | REQUIRED TO REMOVE THE OLD PLAN SHEETS THAT HAVE BEEN | | CORRECTED AND REPLACE THEM WITH THE NEW ONES. THE CLERK | | WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH A STAPLE REMOVER AND A STAPLER. | | ONE SET OF THE OLD PLAN SHEETS THAT HAVE BEEN REMOVED | | SHALL BE MARKED AS VOIDED AND RESUBMITTED ALONG WITH | | THE TWO (OR MORE) SETS THAT CONTAIN THE CORRECTED | | SHEETS. IF THERE ARE ANY SHEETS THAT HAVE BEEN STAMPED | | FOR COUNTY IMPACT FEES, HOA APPROVAL STAMPS OR OTHERS, | | RESUBMIT THOSE SHEETS. | | IF ALL OF THE PLAN SHEETS HAVE BEEN CORRECTED, THEN TWO | | (OR MORE) SETS OF THE NEW PLANS AND ANY OTHER DOCUMENTS | | SHALL BE SUBMITTED. | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-03-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2016-03-30 |
Time |
11:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2016-03-29 |
Time |
15:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-03-30 11:13:41 | APPROVED WITH PROVISOS AS MENTIONED BELOW: | | I REVIEWED THE NEWLY SUBMITTED SHEETS YESTERDAY AND | | FOUND A FEW MINOR ISSUES THAT I BELIEVE CAN BE | | ADDRESSED WITH A PROVISO AS LONG AS THE DESIGN | | PROFESSIONAL AGREES WITH THESE ITEMS. THEY ARE AS | | MENTIONED BELOW: | | | | 1. SHEET E101: FIRE ALARM NOTES 2 QUOTES THE 2008 | | EDITION OF THE NEC WHEN IN FACT THE APPLICABLE CODE | | WOULD BE THE 2011 EDITION. CORRECT ACCORDINGLY. | | 2. INITIALLY WE HAD DISCUSSED THAT THE HOUSE METER AND | | PANEL WOULD BE ON THE BLDG. A WALL, THE PLAN CALL FOR A | | UNI-STRUT STRUCTURE TO SUPPORT THESE ITEMS. IF THIS IS | | FACT WHAT IS PLANNED, PLEASE MAKE CERTAIN THAT ALL | | SHARP EDGES OF THE UNI-STRUT BE PROTECTED WITH END CAPS | | AND THAT THERE BE PROTECTION FROM PHYSICAL DAMAGE IF | | REQUIRED. | | 3. SHEET E102: THOUGH THE END RESULT WILL NOT VARY, THE | | ELECTRICAL LOAD CALCS DO NOT APPEAR TO BE CORRECT. | | 4. SHEET E201: REMINDER THAT THE REQUIRED UTILITY | | EASEMENTS SHALL BE FILES BEFORE ANY FINALS CAN BE | | SECURED. | | 5. NEC 300.5(D)(3) REQUIRES THAT THERE BE A CAUTION | | RIBBON PLACED IN THE SERVICE TRENCH 12"ABOVE THE | | RACEWAYS. | | | | THANK YOU, | | MIKE ALBARRAN | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | PH: 561-805-6746 | | EMAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-02-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2016-02-17 |
Time |
14:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2016-02-16 |
Time |
14;30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-02-18 09:15:32 | WHILE STAMPING THE SECOND SET OF PLANS, A DISCREPANCY | | WAS NOTICED THAT MUST BE CORRECTED BEFORE PROCEEDING. | | BOTH SETS OF ELECTRICAL PLANS DO NOT MATCH. ACCORDING | | TO THE SHEET INDEX ON THE COVER OF BLDG A SET. PAGES | | E301 & E302 ARE THE POWER & LIGHTING FLOOR PLANS FOR | | THE A UNITS AND E401 & 402 ARE THE SAME FOR THE B | | UNITS. WELL ONE SET HAS THE 301 & 302 SHEETS WHILE THE | | OTHER HAS THE 401 & 402 SHEETS. | | | 2016-02-17 14:31:50 | WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE RECORDED EASEMENT, ALL | | PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED DEFICIENCIES HAVE BEEN | | SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED.THEREFORE THIS PERMIT HAS BEEN | | CONDITIONALLY ISSUED PROVIDED A COPY OF THE RECORDED | | EASEMENT IS AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION AT THE TIME OF | | FINAL ELECTRICAL INSPECTION. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-12-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-12-22 |
Time |
17:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-12-22 |
Time |
17:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-12-22 17:24:16 | DECEMBER 22ND, 2015 2ND. ELECTRICAL REVIEW | | | | RE: RESPONSE TO FIRST REVIEW COMMENTS FOR THE PARK | | SLOPE TOWNHOUSES. | | | | BELOW IS MY RESPONSE TO YOUR COMMENTS. PLEASE NOTE THAT | | THEY APPEAR IN THE SAME ORDER IN WHICH YOU SUBMITTED | | THEM TO ME. | | | | 10) I INFORMED YOU THAT WE WILL NEED A COPY OF THE | | RECORDED EASEMENTS BEFORE WE CAN APPROVE THE ELECTRICAL | | REVIEW. YOU DELEGATED TO SOMEONE ELSE, BUT REGARDLESS | | OF WHO SECURES THE EASEMENTS. A COPY OF THE RECORDED | | DOCUMENTS SHALL ACCOMPANY YOUR SUBMITTAL PRIOR TO | | APPROVAL. | | | | 11) WE ALREADY ESTABLISHED A SEPARATE PERMIT FOR THE | | HOUSE METER AND OTHER ITEMS RELATED THERETO. | | | | 12) WE CONCUR ON THE POOL PERMIT ISSUE. | | | | 13) YOU CORRECTED THE NOTE BUT INCORRECT CODE | | REFERENCES REMAIN. THE PROPER CODES TO FOLLOW ARE: THE | | FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE (FFPC) 2012, NFPA 70 | | (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) 2011, NFPA 72 2010 EDITION, | | AND THE 5TH EDITION OF THE 2014 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | (FBC). CORRECT YOUR NOTE ACCORDINGLY. | | | | 17) YOU CONTINUE TO REFER TO A NONEXISTENT CABLE. BX | | CABLE IS NOT RECOGNIZED IN THE CODE BOOK. | | | | 30 - 35) REFER TO SHEET E401 & E402 WHICH WAS NOT | | PROVIDED. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO | | CONTACT ME. HAVE A VERY MERRY CHRISTMAS AND A | | PROSPEROUS 2016. | | | | MIKE ALBARRAN, | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | (561) 805-6746 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-10-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-10-21 |
Time |
20:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2015-10-21 |
Time |
16:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-10-21 18:43:20 | THE PLANS FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED PERMIT APPLICATION | | HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE 2011 EDITION | | OF THE NEC, (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE); THE 5TH EDITION | | OF THE 2014 FBC, (FLORIDA BUILDING CODE) AS APPLICABLE | | AND BELOW ARE THE DEFICIENCIES NOTED. | | 1. YOU SHALL PROVIDE PROOF OF THE RECORDED EASEMENTS | | FOR THE FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT (FPL) UNDERGROUND FEEDERS | | TRAVERSING NEIGHBORING AND NON RELATED PROPERTIES. | | 2. THE HOUSE METER AND PANEL ?H? ON THE EXTERIOR OF | | 1200 S. LAKE AVENUE, ALONG WITH THE RESPECTIVE | | LANDSCAPE LIGHTING AND ANY INCIDENTAL ATTACHED THERETO | | INDICATED OR NOT ON THE APPROVED PLANS SHALL BE | | INSTALLED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. | | 3. ALL POOL ELECTRIC SHALL BE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. | | 4. SPEC NOTE 3, QUOTES NON-APPLICABLE CODES. CORRECT TO | | REFLECT THE CODES IN EFFECT AS INDICATED ABOVE. | | 5. SPEC NOTE 9, REFLECTS INCORRECT ARC-FAULT | | REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CURRENT CODE. CORRECT ACCORDINGLY. | | 6. SPEC NOTE 10, CONDUCTOR INSULATION HAS NOTHING TO DO | | WITH WIRE GAUGE, BUT WITH INSTALLATION CONDITIONS. THWN | | SHALL BE REQUIRED REGARDLESS OF GAUGE FOR CONDUCTORS IN | | WET LOCATIONS. | | 7. GENERAL NOTES 10, REFER TO BX CABLE, CORRECT THAT TO | | REFLECT NM OR AC AS IN THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE NEC. | | 8. GENERAL NOTES 11, ALL LUMINARIES SHALL BE GROUNDED | | AS INDICATED IN PART V OF SECTION 410 OF THE 2011 NEC. | | 9. ADDITIONAL NOTES REQUIRED: | | A) ALL RECEPTACLES TO BE LISTED TAMPER-RESISTANT ?TR? | | AS REQUIRED IN NEC 406.12. | | B) ALL CEILING LUMINAIRE OUTLETS SHALL BE RATED TO | | SUPPORT 50# AS INDICATED IN NEC 314.27. | | C) RECEPTACLES IN WET LOCATIONS SHALL BE LISTED FOR THE | | PURPOSE ?WR? AS INDICATED IN NEC 406.8 | | 10. UNIT ?H? FEEDER NOTES, BLDG. GRD. PER NEC 250.66 A | | 100 AMP SERVICE REQUIRES A #8CU GEC. *THE 5OHM | | RESISTANCE CALLED FOR ON THE PLANS IS PROBABLY | | UNOBTAINABLE. CODE CALLS FOR 25 OHMS IN NEC 250.53. | | 11. ARE YOU SURE YOU WANT THE PANELS SURFACE MOUNTED AS | | INDICATED ON THE RESPECTIVE PANEL SCHEDULES? | | 12. PANEL SCHEDULE ?A? CIRCUIT 14 IS LABELED AS | | DISPOSAL YET INDICATED AS D/W ON FLOOR PLAN. CORRECT | | ACCORDINGLY. | | | | UNIT ?A? | | 1. INDICATE LOCATION OF ELECTRIC METER & SERVICE | | DISCONNECT ON FLOOR PLAN. | | 2. NEC 210.52(E)(3) REQUIRES THAT THERE BE AN OUTLET IN | | THE PORCH AREA. | | 3. ROOM A103, OUTLET SPACING SHALL BE AS PER NEC | | 210.52(A), CHECK THE NORTH WALL. | | 4. THE AREA BETWEEN THE PANTRY AND THE POWDER ROOM IS | | MISSING AN OUTLET. NEC 210.52(A). | | 5. ROOM A300 IS MISSING AN OUTLET ON THE EXTERIOR WALL | | OF ROOM A303. | | 6. ROOM A307 IS MISSING AN OUTLET ON THE EXTERIOR WALL | | OF ROOM A309. | | 7. ROOM A306 REQUIRES A LIGHT CONTROLLED BY A WALL | | SWITCH PER NEC 210.70(A)(3) | | 8. IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS AN HVAC UNIT INSIDE THE | | ATTIC, IF THIS IS CASE; NEC 110.33(B) REQUIRES THAT | | THERE BE A PERMANENT LADDER INTO THE ATTIC. OTHER | | SECTIONS OF THE CODE REQUIRE THAT THERE BE A GFI OUTLET | | AND A LIGHT CONTROLLED BY A WALL SWITCH AND NOT A PULL | | CHAIN INSIDE THE ATTIC. THIS LIGHT SWITCH SHOULD HAVE | | AN INDICATOR SO AS NOT TO LEAVE THE LIGHT ON INSIDE THE | | ATTIC WHEN NOT NEEDED. | | | | UNIT ?B? | | 1. INDICATE LOCATION OF ELECTRIC METER & SERVICE | | DISCONNECT ON FLOOR PLAN. | | 2. NEC 680.10 PROHIBITS ANY UNDERGROUND WIRING FROM | | RUNNING UNDER THE POOL OF WITHIN 5? HORIZONTALLY OF THE | | INSIDE WALL OF THE POOL UNLESS THE WIRING IS DIRECTLY | | RELATED TO THE POOL. | | 3. THERE IS A MISSING OUTLET FOR THE SPACE OUTSIDE OF | | THE SOUTH WALL OF ROOM B302. | | 4. A FLOOR OUTLET SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG THE FLOOR | | LINE OF THE STAIR RAILING. | | 5. ROOM B200 IS MISSING AN OUTLET ON THE WALL OUTSIDE | | OF THE BATHROOM. | | 6. ROOM B307 REQUIRES A LIGHT CONTROLLED BY A WALL | | SWITCH. | | | | THE PLANS SHALL BE REVISED TO ADDRESS THE HEREIN | | MENTIONED ITEMS; ONCE CORRECTED SHALL BE RESUBMITTED | | FOR ANOTHER REVIEW. WHEN RESUBMITTING, YOU ARE REQUIRED | | TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG | | WITH THE STANDARD CITY RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. PLEASE, | | ADDITIONALLY, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE SUBMITTAL | | AND LEAVE THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS FOR | | COMPARISON. CLOUDING THE CHANGES WILL BE GREATLY | | APPRECIATED. | | | | IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO | | CONTACT ME DIRECTLY. | | | | THANK YOU, | | MIKE ALBARRAN | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-02-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
Mgonzale |
Date |
2016-02-18 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2016-02-18 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-10-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
2015-10-29 |
Time |
08:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
cranford |
Date |
2015-10-29 |
Time |
07:59 |
Sent To |
L |
|
Notes |
2015-10-29 08:07:26 | 1. AS MENTIONED DURING PPRC REVIEW SEPARATE SUBMITTALS | | WILL BE REQUIRED TO THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | APPROVAL AND TECHNICAL PLAT REVIEW. | | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | PLEASE CONTACT VINCE NOEL AT [email protected] TO GET A | | COPY OF THE PLAT APPLICATION. | | | | 2. ALSO AS MENTIONED DURING THE PPRC REVIEW, A PROPERTY | | OWNERS ASSOCIATION MUST BE FORMED TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR | | THE OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE COMMONLY OWNED | | UTILITIES. PLEASE SUBMIT ONE COPY OF THE ASSOCIATION | | DOCUMENTS. | | | | 3. CITY STANDARD DETAILS SHOULD BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. | | THEY CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | KELLY CRANFORD, P.E. | | CIP MANAGER | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | [email protected] | | 561-494-1098 (OFFICE) | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-03-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-03-24 |
Time |
04:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-03-24 |
Time |
03:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-03-24 04:10:04 | SEPARATE PERMIT REQUIRED FOR GAS . |
|
|
Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-02-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-02-06 |
Time |
04:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-02-06 |
Time |
04:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-02-06 03:52:35 | 1) SHT. M401 - DRYER COMBUSTION AIR CALCS. - THE TABLE | | SHOW THE LAUNDRY ROOM VOLUME AS 1750 CUBIC FEET. PLEASE | | EXPLAIN HOW A CLOSET THAT MEASURES 3 FT. BY 7 FT. BY | | APPROX. 8 FT.HIGH EQUALS 1750 CUBIC FEET. | | 2) SUBMIT A GAS RISER FOR THE "A" TYPE UNIT.FBC SEC. | | 107.2.1. | | 3) THE REQUIREMENTS FOR COMBUSTION AIR FOR THE DRYER | | HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED IN TWO DIFFERENT WAYS; ONE WITH 50 | | CU. FT. FOR EACH 1000 BTU'S AND ALSO WITH WOOD LOUVER | | DOORS. WHICH METHOD IS BEING USED? IF WOOD LOUVER DOORS | | ARE GOING TO BE USED, SHOW THE DIMENSIONS (LXW) OF THE | | LOUVERED AREA OF EACH DOOR. 25% OF THIS AREA IS THE NET | | FREE AREA OF THE LOUVERS THAT IS TO BE USED IN | | CALCULATING THE REQUIRED SQUARE INCH AREA FOR | | COMBUSTION AIR.2014 FGC SEC.304.10, 304.5.3.1.ALSO, | | REFER TO YOUR RESPONSE TO MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENT | | #25. | | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | TIM LARGE | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | 561-805-6692 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-12-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2015-12-01 |
Time |
14:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2015-12-01 |
Time |
14:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-12-01 14:28:13 | 2ND REVIEW: FBC 2014 | | | | GEORGE JOHNSON | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6711 | | [email protected] | | | | GAS COMMENTS: | | | | 1.MEP SHEETS DO NOT COMPLY WITH FL ADMEN CODE SEC | | 61G15-23.003 PROCEDURES FOR PHYSICALLY SIGNING AND | | SEALING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER | | DOCUMENTS. | | ENGINEERING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER | | DOCUMENTS WHICH MUST BE SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 471.025, | | F.S., AND RULE 61G15-23.001, F.A.C. MAY BE PHYSICALLY | | SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED AS PROVIDED HEREIN BY THE | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE. | | (1) THE LICENSEE SHALL SIGN BY HAND AN ORIGINAL OF THE | | LICENSEE?S SIGNATURE ON EACH PAGE REQUIRED TO BE | | SEALED. A SCANNED, FACSIMILE, DIGITALLY CREATED OR | | COPIED IMAGE OF THE LICENSEE?S SIGNATURE SHALL NOT BE | | USED. | | (2) THE LICENSEE MUST THEN USE A WET SEAL, A DIGITALLY | | CREATED SEAL, OR AN EMBOSSING SEAL PLACED PARTIALLY | | OVERLAPPING THE LICENSEE?S SIGNATURE ON EACH PAGE | | REQUIRED TO BE SEALED. THE PLACEMENT OF THE SEAL SHALL | | NOT RENDER THE SIGNATURE ILLEGIBLE. | | | | 2.PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL AND MANUFACTURE INSTALLATION | | GUIDE FOR WATER HEATER VENT. PER WPB AMEND TO FBC SEC | | 107.2.1 SHEET M401 IS REFERENCED IN YOUR RESPONSE BUT | | IT IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE PLAN SET. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-09-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2015-09-21 |
Time |
06:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2015-09-21 |
Time |
06:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-09-21 06:39:07 | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2014 | | | | GAS COMMENTS: | | 1.SHEETS P203 AND P303 YOU REFERENCED SIZING TABLES | | FROM FBC FUEL GAS 2010 AND ON P303 THE TABLE ON THE LOW | | PRESSURE SIDE OF THE RISER IS NOTE MATCHING UP TO THE | | TABLE AT THE TOP OF THE PAGE . THE RISER APPEARS TO BE | | OVER SIZED PLEASE RESIZE USE TABLES FROM FBC FUEL GAS | | 2014. | | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE COMBUSTION AIR CALCULATIONS FOR WATER | | HEATER AND DRYER. PER WPB AMEND 107.2.1 | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE SPEC SHEETS ON DRYER, TANKLESS HEATER | | AND RANGE. PER WPB AMEND 107.2.1 | | | | GEORGE JOHNSON | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6711 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
HIST |
HISTORICAL |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-03-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
2016-03-14 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
llouie |
Date |
2016-03-14 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
HIST |
HISTORICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-02-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
2016-02-01 |
Time |
17:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
llouie |
Date |
2016-02-01 |
Time |
17:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
HIST |
HISTORICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-01-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
fmittner |
Date |
2016-01-11 |
Time |
11:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
fmittner |
Date |
2016-01-28 |
Time |
11:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
HIST |
HISTORICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-11-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
fmittner |
Date |
2015-11-05 |
Time |
08:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
fmittner |
Date |
2015-11-05 |
Time |
08:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-03-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
albarran |
Date |
2016-03-30 |
Time |
11:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
albarran |
Date |
2016-03-07 |
Time |
10:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-03-30 11:13:02 | | | | 2016-03-08 10:33:08 | R25 - TRAVELLING WITH 15081154, 15090390, 15090391, | | 15090392, 15090393 & 15090394 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-02-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2016-02-19 |
Time |
09:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2016-01-29 |
Time |
12:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-01-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2016-01-29 |
Time |
12:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2015-11-23 |
Time |
10:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-11-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2015-11-05 |
Time |
09:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lmarchan |
Date |
2015-08-31 |
Time |
16:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-08-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2016-08-18 |
Time |
11:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2016-08-18 |
Time |
11:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-08-18 11:30:07 | MU 2016 - 4113, PAID $22,553.46 (BUILDING A) |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-03-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2016-03-17 |
Time |
15:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2016-03-17 |
Time |
15:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-03-17 16:03:37 | BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT CAN BE ISSUED, IMPACT FEES | | MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. UPON CITY APPROVAL, | | ONE SET OF PLANS SHALL BE SIGNED OUT AND SUBMITTED TO | | PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR AN IMPACT FEE REVIEW. THE PLANS | | WITH THE IMPACT FEE STAMP AND A COPY OF THE PAID | | RECEIPT MUST BE RETURNED TO THE CITY BUILDING | | DEPARTMENT BEFORE THE BUILDING PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. | | FOR INFORMATION CALL PALM BEACH COUNTY IMPACT FEES AT | | (561) 233-5025. |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-02-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2016-02-17 |
Time |
15:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2016-02-17 |
Time |
15:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-02-17 15:28:15 | SEE 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-02-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-12-22 |
Time |
15:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-12-22 |
Time |
15:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-02-17 15:23:52 | SEE COMMENTS FROM 1ST REVIEW. |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-10-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-10-22 |
Time |
07:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-10-22 |
Time |
07:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-10-22 07:55:55 | BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT CAN BE ISSUED, IMPACT FEES | | MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. UPON CITY APPROVAL, | | ONE SET OF PLANS SHALL BE SIGNED OUT AND SUBMITTED TO | | PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR AN IMPACT FEE REVIEW. THE PLANS | | WITH THE IMPACT FEE STAMP AND A COPY OF THE PAID | | RECEIPT MUST BE RETURNED TO THE CITY BUILDING | | DEPARTMENT BEFORE THE BUILDING PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED. | | FOR INFORMATION CALL PALM BEACH COUNTY IMPACT FEES AT | | (561) 233-5025. |
|
|
Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-03-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
2016-03-11 |
Time |
16:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
2016-03-11 |
Time |
16:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-03-11 16:21:54 | NEED SEPARETE PERMIT AND PLANS FOR LANDSCAPE |
|
|
Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-11-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
2015-11-30 |
Time |
15:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
2015-11-30 |
Time |
15:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-11-30 15:56:25 | SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT REQUIRED |
|
|
Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-11-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
2015-11-04 |
Time |
13:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
2015-11-04 |
Time |
13:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-11-04 13:44:03 | SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION REQUIRED FOR LANDSCAPING. | | LANDSCAPE PLANS ARE IN THIS PERMIT SET. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-03-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2016-03-18 |
Time |
08:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2016-03-18 |
Time |
14:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-03-18 14:18:35 | MECHANICAL PROVISO: | | 3/18/16 | | | | PER THE ENGINEER'S REQUEST, REVISED AC CALCULATIONS, | | PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS | | SHALL BE SUBMITTED AT A FUTURE DATE. | | | | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6719 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-02-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2016-02-12 |
Time |
12:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2016-02-12 |
Time |
12:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-02-12 12:45:49 | 3RD REVIEW: FBC 2014 MECHANICAL | | PERMIT #15081154: MODEL A- #1200. | | 2/12/16 | | | | 1) THERE ARE SEVERAL CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE AC COOLING | | LOAD CALCULATIONS, THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND THE AC | | PLANS. | | A) THE AC CALCULATIONS INDICATE A 4-TON LOAD FOR AC | | A-01 WHICH IS CONDITIONING THE 1ST LEVEL, HOWEVER SHEET | | M401 INDICATES A 3-TON SYSTEM FOR THE 1ST LEVEL SYSTEM. | | PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SYSTEM IS MISLABED AC-B, AND REFER | | TO SECTION R403.6.1.1FBC-14 ENERGY CONSERVATION WHICH | | REQUIRES SYSTEMS TO BE SIZED NOT LESS NOT THAN THE | | CALCULATED LOADS. | | B) AC CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED FOR ACA- 02 | | HOWEVER THE PLANS ARE INDICATING ACB-02. | | C) AC CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED FOR VAV A-01B, | | HOWEVER THAT SYSTEM IS NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS. | | D) THE SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATION FORM R405-2014 | | SHOWS COMPLIANCE DATA FOR A SINGLE COOLING SYSTEM WHICH | | APPEARS TO ACTUALLY BE COMPLIANCE DATA FOR THE TWO | | 4-TON SYSTEMS SHOWN IN THE SCHEDULE COMBINED AND | | AVERAGED. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE DATA FOR EACH | | INDIVIDUAL SYSTEM AND COMPARE WITH THE PLANS WHICH | | INDICATES A 3-TON AND A 4-TON SYSTEM. | | E) THE AC CALCULATIONS ARE INDICATING THE FRONT DOOR | | FACES EAST HOWEVER THE FRONT DOOR IS FACING NORTH. | | | | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6719 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-12-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2015-12-14 |
Time |
14:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2015-12-14 |
Time |
14:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-12-14 14:46:42 | 2ND REVIEW 2014 MECHANICAL | | PERMIT #15081154 | | 12/14/15 | | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE REVISED PLANS AND THE RESPONSE | | NARRATIVE FROM JWL ENGINEERING, HOWEVER INADEQUATE | | REVISIONS AND RESPONSES HAVE BEEN GIVEN TO SOME OF THE | | COMMENTS. THE FOLLOWING REVIEW WILL REFER BACK TO THOSE | | 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS. PLEASE NOTE THE RESPONSE NARRATIVE | | FROM JWL ADDRESSES ONLY THE FIRST FOUR COMMENTS (LISTED | | AS 6-9 IN THE NARRATIVE), AND THERE WERE NO RESPONSES | | FROM THE ARCHITECT. | | 1) COMMENT #1: THE NARRATIVE REPONSE TO THIS COMMENT | | STATES THAT THE REQUESTED DESIGN CRITERIA FOR THE | | PROJECT IS NOTED ON SHEET M101, HOWEVER I DID NOT SEE | | ANY INFORMATION LISTED IN THE MECH SPEC NOTES. | | 2) COMMENT #3: SECTION 405.4.2 EXCEPTION ALLOWS FOR | | WORSE CASE SCENARARIOS, HOWEVER AS NOTED IN THE 1ST | | REVIEW, INDIVIDUAL ENERGY AND AC CALCULATIONS SHALL BE | | SUBMITTED FOR EACH TOWN HOME UNDER PERMIT PER SECTION | | R103.1 FBC-14 ENERGY CONSERVATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE | | RE-SUBMITTED ENERGY FORM R405-2014 INDICATES IT IS NOT | | A WORSE CASE ON PAGE 1. | | 3) COMMENT #4: RE-SUBMITTED FORM R405-2014 : A) PAGE 1 | | INDICATES 98.7 KBTU/HR FOR 2204 SQ.FT.- ONE OF THESE | | VALUES IS INCORRECT. B) PAGE 3- THE COOLING SYSTEM DATA | | DOES NOT INDICATE A COOLING CAPACITY VALUE, AND THE | | 2960 AIR FLOW CFM'S DOES NOT MATCH THE CFM'S INDICATED | | IN THE AC EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE ON M101. C) THE PREVIOUSLY | | REQUESTED COMPLIANCE DATA FOR THE DOORS WAS NOT PLACED | | INTO THE CALCULATIONS. | | 4) COMMENT #5: AC COOLING AND HEATING CALCULATIONS HAVE | | BEEN SUBMITTED FOR THE ENTIRE BUILDING, HOWEVER THEY DO | | NOT INDICATE A "WORSE CASE SCENARIO" AND DO NOT SHOW | | CALCULATIONS AT EACH DIRECTIONAL ORIENTATION- NORTH, | | SOUTH, EAST, AND WEST- PLEASE CORRECT. | | 5) COMMENTS #6,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,& 15: NO RESPONSES OR | | REVISIONS WERE PROVIDED: REFER TO 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS | | AND COMPLY. PLEASE NOTE IN REGARD TO COMMENT #9- THE | | PLUMBING PLANS LIST THE WATER HEATER CAPACTITY AT 199 | | CFH NOT AT 34 KBTUH, | | | | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6719 | | [email protected] | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-09-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
ccole |
Date |
2015-09-28 |
Time |
13:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
ccole |
Date |
2015-09-28 |
Time |
13:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-09-28 14:37:19 | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2014 RESIDENTIAL | | PERMIT #15081154 | | 9/28/15 | | | | 1) DESIGN CRITERIA: PLEASE PROVIDE DEFINITIVE DESIGN | | CRITERIA AND CODE DATA ON THE PLANS FOR THE PROPOSED | | PROJECT. AS THE PERMIT APPLICATIONS INDICATE "TOWN | | HOMES" I AM REVIEWING THE PLANS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | FBC-14 RESIDENTIAL CODE. PLEASE REVIEW AND REVISE WHERE | | REQUIRED. | | 2) CORRECT THE SUBMITTED ENERGY AND HVAC CALCULATIONS | | INDICATING "LANTANA, FL." IN THE TITLE ADDRESSES- THE | | PROPOSED PROJECT IS IN THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH. | | 3) INDIVIDUAL ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND AC COOLING AND | | HEATING CALCULATIONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED SEPARATELY FOR | | EACH TOWN HOME IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION R103.1 FBC-14 | | ENERGY CONSERVATION- "GENERAL. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS | | AND OTHER SUPPORTING DATA SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN ONE OR | | MORE SETS WITH EACH APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT. THE | | CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE PREPARED BY A | | REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL WHERE REQUIRED BY THE | | STATUTES OF THE JURISDICTION IN WHICH THE PROJECT IS TO | | BE CONSTRUCTED. WHERE SPECIAL CONDITIONS EXIST, THE | | CODE OFFICIAL IS AUTHORIZED TO REQUIRE NECESSARY | | CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS TO BE PREPARED BY A REGISTERED | | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL." EACH SUBMITTAL DOCUMENT SHALL | | BEAR THE SAME ADDRESS AS THE ONE LISTED ON THE | | CORRESPONDING PERMIT APPLICATION, AND MANUAL J AC | | SIZING WORKSHEETS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR EACH NEW TOWN | | HOME INDICATING DIRECTIONAL ORIENTATIONS AND CALCULATED | | LOADS FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL TOWN HOME- REFER TO SECTION | | R403.6.1 FBC-14 ENERGY CONSERVATION- "WORST CASE | | SCENARIOS" FOR EACH BUILDING ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. | | 4) REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED ENERGY EFFICIENCY FORM | | R405-2014 FOR BLDG. A REVEALED THESE DEFICIENCIES: A) | | THE SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATION DOESN'T MATCH THE | | FOOTAGE LISTED ON SHEET A-1.0. B) THE WINDOW U-VALUES | | LISTED DON'T MATCH THE U-VALUES LISTED ON THE AC | | CALCULATIONS. C) THE 18.46 SEER LISTED FOR THE AC | | SYSTEM DOESN'T MATCH THE 17.3 SEER SYSTEMS LISTED IN | | THE AC EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE. D) THE AIRFLOW CFM'S AND | | HEATING CAPACITIES LISTED DON'T MATCH THE AC SCHEDULE. | | E) THERE IS NO COMPLIANCE DATA LISTED FOR THE DOORS, | | INCLUDING THE GARAGE DOOR WHICH IS PART OF THE THERMAL | | ENVELOPE. | | 5) REVIEW OF THE SUBMITTED HVAC CALCULATIONS REVEALED | | THESE DEFICIENCIES: A) THE COOLING EQUIPMENT SUMMARIES | | WERE NOT COMPLETED FOR EACH SYSTEM. B) REFER TO COMMENT | | #3. | | 6) SHEET M101: CORRECT THE REFERENCES TO THE FBCM SHOWN | | ON THE BUILDING AND GARAGE VENTILATION TABLES. PROVIDE | | CALCULATIONS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE FBC-14 RESIDENTIAL. | | 7) M102, DETAIL A7: THE PRINT IN THE DETAIL AND | | STRAPPING TABLE IS TOO FAINT TO READ AND NEEDS TO BE | | EMBOLDENED FOR REVIEW AND COMPUTER SCANNING. PLEASE | | NOTE THAT THE ROOM ID NUMBERS SHOWN ON ALL OF THE | | LAYOUT PLANS ALSO NEED TO BE EMBOLDENED. | | 8) M102, DETAIL C7: INDICATE THE TYPE AND SIZE OF | | CONDENSATE PIPING TO BE INSTALLED. | | 9) M301: CORRECT THE REFERENCES TO THE FBCFG ON THE | | RANGE AND DRYER COMBUSTION TABLES. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS | | IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE FBC-14 RESIDENTIAL. PLEASE NOTE | | THE DRYER IN THE CLOSET MUST BE PROVIDED COMBUSTION AIR | | THROUGH OPENINGS IN THE DOORS- SEE SECTION G2407.5.3 | | FBC-14 RESIDENTIAL AND PROVIDE SIZING CALCULATIONS AND | | OPENING SIZES. | | 10) M301: REFER TO SECTION M1305.1.1 AND SHOW | | COMPLIANCE FOR THE AIR HANDLERS IN THE CLOSETS- PROVIDE | | AN ENLARGED DETAIL IF NECESSARY TO THE REQUIRED | | CLEARANCE DIMENSIONS. | | 11) M301: CORRECT THE 820 CFM'S OF RETURN AIR SHOWN ON | | THE 16" X 16" GRILL IN BEDROOM #A307. CLARIFY HOW ALL | | AIR IS BEING RETURNED TO THE AIR HANDLER- THE PLAN | | SHOWS A LOUVERED DOOR, BUT THE DETAIL ON M102 SHOWS A | | DUCTED RETURN IN THE CLOSET. | | 12) M301: THE AIR HANDLER IN THE GARAGE MUST BE | | PROTECTED FROM VEHICLE IMPACT- SEE SECTION M1307.3.1 | | AND PROVIDE A BOLLARD OR OTHER APPROVED MEANS OF | | PROTECTION. | | 13) SHOW THE CONDENSATE DISPOSAL PIPING RUNS AND | | DISCHARGE LOCATIONS. | | 14) SHOW THE REFRIGERANT PIPING RUNS. | | 15) PROVIDE A SUBMITTAL PACKAGE CONSISTING OF THE | | RANGE, RANGE HOOD AND EXHAUST DUCT, WATER HEATER AND | | VENT PIPING, DRYER AND VENT PIPING, AC SYSTEMS, AND THE | | VAV BOXES. | | | | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE | | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6719 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-03-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-03-24 |
Time |
03:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-03-24 |
Time |
02:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2016-02-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-02-06 |
Time |
04:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2016-02-06 |
Time |
04:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-02-06 03:53:46 | 1) SHT. P102 - PLANS REFER TO SHTS. P201, 202, & 203 | | FOR DETAILS FOR A TYPE "A" BUILDING. THERE ARE NO SHTS. | | P201, 202 OR 203 IN THIS SET OF PLANS. CLARIFY. | | 2) SUBMIT PLUMBING PLANS FOR THE TYPE "A" BUILDING. | | 2014 FBC SEC. 107.2.1. THERE ARE NO PLUMBING PLANS FOR | | TYPE A IN THIS SET. CLARIFY. | | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | TIM LARGE | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | 561-805-6692 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-12-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2015-12-01 |
Time |
14:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2015-12-01 |
Time |
14:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-12-01 14:32:50 | 2ND REVIEW: FBC 2014 | | | | GEORGE JOHNSON | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6711 | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | PLUMBING COMMENTS: | | | | 1. MEP SHEETS DO NOT COMPLY WITH FL ADMEN CODE | | SE61G15-23.003 PROCEDURES FOR PHYSICALLY SIGNING AND | | SEALING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER | | DOCUMENTS. | | ENGINEERING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS OR OTHER | | DOCUMENTS WHICH MUST BE SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 471.025, | | F.S., AND RULE 61G15-23.001, F.A.C. MAY BE PHYSICALLY | | SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED AS PROVIDED HEREIN BY THE | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE. | | (1) THE LICENSEE SHALL SIGN BY HAND AN ORIGINAL OF THE | | LICENSEE?S SIGNATURE ON EACH PAGE REQUIRED TO BE | | SEALED. A SCANNED, FACSIMILE, DIGITALLY CREATED OR | | COPIED IMAGE OF THE LICENSEE?S SIGNATURE SHALL NOT BE | | USED. | | (2) THE LICENSEE MUST THEN USE A WET SEAL, A DIGITALLY | | CREATED SEAL, OR AN EMBOSSING SEAL PLACED PARTIALLY | | OVERLAPPING THE LICENSEE?S SIGNATURE ON EACH PAGE | | REQUIRED TO BE SEALED. THE PLACEMENT OF THE SEAL SHALL | | NOT RENDER THE SIGNATURE ILLEGIBLE. | | | | 2. FYI WPB AMEND. TO FBC SEC 107.3.5 MINIMUM PLAN | | REVIEW CRITERIA FOR BUILDINGS. 107.3.5.3 RESIDENTIAL | | (ONE AND TWO-FAMILY)- 11.PLUMBING: | | PLUMBING RISER. A PLUMBING RISER CONTAINS BOTH SANITARY | | AND POTABLE WATER. PLEASE SHOW LOCATION OF MAIN SHUT | | OFF VALVE SHALL COMPLY WITH FBCP 606.1 LOCATION OF | | FULL-OPEN VALVES. | | FULL-OPEN VALVES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE FOLLOWING | | LOCATIONS 2. ON THE WATER DISTRIBUTION SUPPLY PIPE AT | | THE ENTRANCE INTO THE STRUCTURE. | | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL OF EMERGENCY ROOF SCUPPER | | SHALL COMPLY WITH FBC SEC 1503.4.2.1 | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-09-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2015-09-21 |
Time |
06:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
gjohnson |
Date |
2015-09-21 |
Time |
06:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-09-21 06:40:07 | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2014 | | | | PLUMBING COMMENTS: | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE WATER RISER DIAGRAM. PER WPB AMEND. | | 107.3.5.1.3(13) | | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE SPEC. ON SHOWER PANS, TUBS AND THE | | TANKLESS WATER HEATER. PER WPB AMEND. 107.2.1 | | | | GEORGE JOHNSON | | PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6711 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-03-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
2016-03-14 |
Time |
13:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
llouie |
Date |
2016-03-14 |
Time |
13:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-03-14 13:56:16 | ZONING APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING PROVISOS: | | | | 1.) LANDSCAPE HEDGE REQUIRED IN FRONT OF THE CHAIN LINK | | FENCE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LINE ALONG THE EASTERN | | BOUNDARY OF THE SITE. | | | | 2.) CHAIN LINK FENCE ALONG EASTERN BOUNDARY OF SITE | | SHALL NOT EXCEED 4 FT. IN HEIGHT WITHIN THE FIRST 25 | | FT. OF THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE. | | | | 3.) SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION AND REVIEW REQUIRED FOR | | LANDSCAPING. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-02-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
2016-02-01 |
Time |
17:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
llouie |
Date |
2016-02-01 |
Time |
17:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-02-01 17:03:00 | ZONING APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING PROVISOS: | | | | 1.) SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION AND REVIEW REQUIRED FOR | | LANDSCAPING. | | | | 2.) LANDSCAPE HEDGE WILL BE REQUIRED IN FRONT OF CHAIN | | LINK FENCE ON THE EAST SIDE OF BUILDING B. | | | | 3.) APPLICATION IS SUBJECT TO REQUIREMENT FOR ART IN | | PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP). PLEASE CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, | | AIPP COORDINATOR AT (561) 822-1521. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-12-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
2015-12-10 |
Time |
10:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
llouie |
Date |
2015-12-10 |
Time |
10:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-12-10 10:13:23 | ** FAILED ** | | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS. RESPOND TO THE | | COMMENTS IN WRITING AND/OR ON THE PLANS WHERE | | APPLICABLE: | | | | 1.) REPEAT COMMENT: A RE-PLAT OF THE PROPERTY IS | | REQUIRED. AN APPLICATION FOR A RE-PLAT SHALL BE | | SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY THE CITY, AND RECORDED | | WITH PALM BEACH COUNTY PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF A | | BUILDING PERMIT. | | | | (12/10/15 NOTE: THE RE-PLAT (RESOLUTION NO. 366-15) IS | | SCHEDULED FOR THE 1/4/16 CITY COMMISSION MEETING FOR | | APPROVAL.) | | | | ADDITIONAL NOTE(S): | | | | * ALL NEW PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT, NEW CONSTRUCTION, | | RENOVATION OR REMODELING, WHERE THE TOTAL VERTICAL | | CONSTRUCTION OF ALL BUILDINGS ON A PROJECT SITE ARE | | EQUAL OR GREATER THAN $500,000.00 IS SUBJECT TO THE ART | | IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED IN | | CHAPTER 78, ARTICLE V OF THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCES. | | PLEASE CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, AIPP COORDINATOR, AT | | (561) 822-1521 FOR MORE INFORMATION. | | | | * PLEASE CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF YOU | | HAVE QUESTIONS. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-10-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
llouie |
Date |
2015-10-28 |
Time |
16:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
llouie |
Date |
2015-10-28 |
Time |
16:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-10-28 16:06:47 | ** FAILED ** | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE SITE PLAN HAVE NOT BEEN | | ADDRESSED (REFERENCE: ISPR 15-01): | | | | 1.) A RE-PLAT OF THE PROPERTY IS REQUIRED. AN | | APPLICATION FOR A RE-PLAT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO AND | | APPROVED BY THE CITY, AND RECORDED WITH PALM BEACH | | COUNTY PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT. | | | | 2.) ALL NEW PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT, NEW CONSTRUCTION, | | RENOVATION OR REMODELING, WHERE THE TOTAL VERTICAL | | CONSTRUCTION OF ALL BUILDINGS ON A PROJECT SITE ARE | | EQUAL OR GREATER THAN $500,000.00 IS SUBJECT TO THE ART | | IN PUBLIC PLACES (AIPP) REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED IN | | CHAPTER 78, ARTICLE V OF THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCES. | | PLEASE CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, AIPP COORDINATOR, AT | | (561) 822-1521 FOR MORE INFORMATION. | | | | PLEASE CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF YOU HAVE | | QUESTIONS. | | | | |
|
|