Plan Review Details - Permit 15070952
Plan Review Stops For Permit 15070952
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 8 Status F Date 2017-03-29 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2017-03-29 Time 18:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2017-03-29 Time 12:40 Sent To  
Notes
2017-03-29 14:07:06RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, 8TH BUILDING REVIEW
 CHECKLIST. (REAR BUILDING).
 CODE: FBC-5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 1- INFORMATION SUBMITTED IN THE DESIGN CRITERIA ON
 SHEETS A-1 AND A-2 IS NOT CLEAR. CLARIFY WHAT IS THE
 EXTERNAL = -0.9, INTERNAL - 0.2 AND NET UPLIFT
 COEFFICIENT=1.1 AND WHERE WERE IS THIS INFORMATION
 TAKEN FROM. ENGINEER OF RECORD TO PROVIDE CLARIFICATION
 IN WRITING. SEC. 107.2.1 AND 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 RESPONSE: RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT "ALL REFERENCES
 WERE TAKEN FROM ASCE 7-10 AS FOLLOWS: EXTERNAL PRESSURE
 COEFFICIENT CHAPTER 30.2.4 TABLE 30.3.1. INTERNAL
 PRESSURE COEFFICIENT TAKEN FROM CH. 26.11.1. NET UPLIFT
 COEFFICIENT TAKEN FROM CH. 27". THIS PARTIAL DESIGN
 INFORMATION DOESN'T SEEM TO MAKE SENSE AND SEEMS TO BE
 INCORRECT.
  
 2- TWO STORY WALL SECTION ON SHEET A-2:
 A) REVISE ROOF SHEATHING FASTENING TYPE AND SPACING.
 SEE SEC. R803. 2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
 REPEAT COMMENT. ENGINEER NOW SPECIFIED "8D CORREGATED
 NAILS 4" @ EDGE 9" ELSEWHERE". CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHAT'S
 A 8D CORREGATED NAIL. ALSO, TYPE OF NAIL AND SPACING
 LOOKS LESS STRONGER THAN THE MINIMUM REQUIRED BY SEC.
 R803.2.3.1. ENGINEER TO PROVIDE CALCULATIONS SHOWING
 THAT THE PROPOSED NAIL TYPE AND SPACING IS EQUAL OR
 BETTER THAN THE REQUIRED BY CODE.
 SEC. 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. SAME DRAWING WAS
 RE-SUBMITTED.
  
 B) REVISE ROOF FRAMING FASTENERS. R301.1
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 REPEAT COMMENT. FASTENERS SPECIFIED NOW DON'T MATCH
 FASTENERS SPECIFIED ON THE REVISED ROOF FRAMING PLAN.
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. SAME DRAWING WAS
 RE-SUBMITTED.
  
 C) SPECIFY ROOF INSULATION. SEC. R103.2 FBC-ENERGY
 CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014).
 REPEAT COMMENT. ENGINEER SPECIFIED R-30 ROOF
 INSULATION. CLEARLY SPECIFIED WHAT KIND OF INSULATION
 IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED. IF USING R-30 BATT
 INSULATION, THEN IT CAN NOT BE USED BECAUSE R-30 BATT
 INSULATION DOESN'T FIT ON 2 X 8 ROOF RAFTERS. THE
 THICKNESS OF R-30 BATT IS ABOUT 9-1/2". IN ADDITION IT
 DOESN'T ALLOW THE 1" SPACE BETWEEN INSULATION AND ROOF
 SHEATHING REQUIRED BY SEC. R806.3 FOR VENTILATION.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. SAME DRAWING WAS
 RE-SUBMITTED.
  
 D) CLARIFY HOW THE SPECIFIED ROOF VENTILATION PROVIDE
 CROSS VENTILATION TO ENTIRE ROOF AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 R806 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 REPEAT COMMENT. ENGINEER SPECIFIED 2" HOLE WITH SCREEN
 COVER FOR VENT EVERY OTHER RAFTER @ EA. END. THIS ONLY
 PROVIDES VENTILATION AT EVERY OTHER RAFTER. WHAT ABOUT
 CROSS VENTILATION FOR THE OTHER RAFTERS? .
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. SAME DRAWING WAS
 RE-SUBMITTED.
  
 E) A) WHAT'S IS THE "2 X 2 BELOW" SHOWN ON THE SECOND
 FLOOR BY THE ROOF AREA?. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. SAME DRAWING WAS
 RE-SUBMITTED.
  
 F) ENGINEER SPECIFIED 2" HOLE WITH SCREEN COVER FOR
 VENT EVERY OTHER RAFTER @ EA. END. PROVIDE
 SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW THE PROPOSED HOLES PROVIDE
 WATER RESISTANCE FROM THE WIND DRIVEN RAIN. SEC.
 R703.1.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. SAME DRAWING WAS
 RE-SUBMITTED.
  
 G) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
 CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROOF EAVE SHOWN N ON REVISED PLANS.
 SPECIFY ALL FRAMING MEMBERS AND FASTENERS. SEC. R301.1
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. SAME DRAWING WAS
 RE-SUBMITTED.
  
 H) NEED TO SPECIFY ROOF GUTTERS AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 R318.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND
 SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF ROOF GUTTERS.
 NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM #3(G) ABOVE.
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. SAME DRAWING WAS
 RE-SUBMITTED.
  
 I) SPECIFY ON PLANS THE ROOF SLOPE AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 R905.11.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. SAME DRAWING WAS
 RE-SUBMITTED.
  
 3- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED;
 A) NEED TO PROVIDE THE NAME OF THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE
 FOR THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 R405.4.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014).
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. NEED THE NAME OF
 THE PERSON WHO PREPARED THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. ONLY A
 SIGNATURE WAS PROVIDED. SIGNATURE IS NOT A NAME. UNABLE
 TO IDENTIFY WHO PREPARED THEM.
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. SAME ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS WERE RE-SUBMITTED.
  
 B) CEILING INSULATION ITEM #10. NEW PLANS CALL FOR 2 X
 8 ROOF JOISTS. R30 BATT INSULATION DOESN'T FIT ON A 2 X
 8 SPACE. BATT INSULATION IS +/- 9-1/2" THICK. IN
 ADDITION L NEED AT LEAST 1" CLEAR SPACE FOR CROSS
 VENTILATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R103.2 FBC-ENERGY
 CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014).
 REPEAT COMMENT. THIS NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE
 ENGINEER OF RECORD. PLANS NEED TO BE REVISED. REVISE
 THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ONCE THE PLANS ARE REVISED TO
 COMPLY WITH THE INSULATION AND VENTILATION
 REQUIREMENTS.
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. SAME ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS WERE RE-SUBMITTED.
  
 C) SIZE OF A/C UNIT SHOWN ON ITEM #12 SEEMS TO BE TOO
 SMALL FOR THE SIZE OF THE APARTMENT. THIS ITEM NEEDS TO
 BE COORDINATED WITH THE A/C EQUIPMENT SIZING
 CALCULATIONS. SEC. R403.6.1 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION,
 5TH EDITION (2014).
 REPEAT COMMENT. SIZE OF EQUIPMENT SPECIFIED ON PREVIOUS
 ENERGY CALCULATIONS WAS TOO BIG NOW SIZE SPECIFIED
 SEEMS TO BE TOO SMALL. THIS NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED
 BEFORE REVISING THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS.
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. SAME ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS WERE RE-SUBMITTED.
  
 D) ROOF MATERIAL SPECIFIED ON PAGE 2 OF 4 DOESN'T MATCH
 PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R103.2 FBC-ENERGY
 CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014).
 REPEAT COMMENT. ROOF MATERIAL IS NOT COMPOSITION
 SHINGLES. THIS IS A FLAT ROOF. SEE PLANS AND PRODUCT
 APPROVALS SUBMITTED AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. SAME ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS WERE RE-SUBMITTED.
  
 NOTE:
 LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR AND
 SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WILL
 BE REQUIRED AT TIME OF INSPECTION WHEN ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS ARE NOT USING THE DEFAULT FACTOR FOR
 GLAZING.
  
 4- FLAT ROOF NOA 14-1030.02 SUBMITTED.
 PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS AS
 REQUIRED BY GENERAL LIMITATION #7 ON LAST PAGE OF NOA.
 REPEAT COMMENT. CALCULATIONS WERE REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS
 COMMENTS IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE
 DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES. CALCULATIONS
 REQUIRED TO MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL.
  
 5- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO
 LOW BASED ON ALL THE NEW SCOPE OF WORK. VALUATION TO
 INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND
 PROFIT AND ALL DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES. REVISE
 VALUATION AS REQUIRED. PROVIDE COPY OF PROPERLY SIGNED
 CONTRACT FOR BUILDING OFFICIAL REVIEW/APPROVAL. NOTE:
 INCLUDE THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES.
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL.
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL.
  
 6- ROOF TYPE SHOWN ON THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ON NEW
 SHEET E-1 DON'T MATCH ROOF TYPE SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED
 ROOF PLAN ON SHEET A-1. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. SAME DRAWING WAS
 RE-SUBMITTED.
  
 7- STAIRS SHOWN ON THE NORTH ELEVATION, EAST ELEVATION
 ON SHEET E-1 AND GROUND FLOOR PLAN, SECOND FLOOR PLAN
 ON SHEET A-1 DON'T MAKE SENSE. NUMBER OF STEPS SHOWN
 AND THE WAY THEY ARE DRAWN DON'T MAKE ANY SENSE. THEY
 ARE NOT PROPERLY DRAWN. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC.
 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. SAME DRAWING WAS
 RE-SUBMITTED.
  
 8- SCOPE OF WORK ON SHEET A-1 SPECIFIES "SAWCUT FLOOR
 FOR NEW FOOTING REQUIRED". PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND
 SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS SCOPE OF WORK. SEC. R301.1
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. SAME DRAWING WAS
 RE-SUBMITTED.
  
 9- NEW REVISED COVER DRAWING: SIZE OF WINDOW #11 SHOWN
 ON THE EXISTING WINDOWS SCHEDULE, REPLACEMENT WINDOWS
 SCHEDULE AND SECOND FLOOR PLAN DON'T MATCH. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 NOTE:
 ENGINEER TO PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH
 COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 7 Status F Date 2017-01-05 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2017-01-05 Time 14:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2017-01-04 Time 17:17 Sent To  
Notes
2017-01-03 15:38:20RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, 7TH BUILDING REVIEW
 CHECKLIST. (REAR BUILDING).
 CODE: FBC-5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 NOTE:
 ENGINEER OF RECORD MAY BE CHARGED 4 TIMES THE PLAN
 REVIEW FEE, WHEN THE PLANS ARE DENIED 3 OR MORE TIMES
 AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B).
  
  
 1- INFORMATION SUBMITTED IN THE DESIGN CRITERIA IS NOT
 CLEAR. CLARIFY WHAT IS THE EXTERNAL = -0.9, INTERNAL -
 0.2 AND NET UPLIFT COEFFICIENT=1.1 AND WHERE WERE IS
 THIS INFORMATION TAKEN FROM. ENGINEER OF RECORD TO
 PROVIDE CLARIFICATION IN WRITING. SEC. 107.2.1 AND
 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS.
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL.
  
 2- SEC. R303.9 REQUIRES HEATING. PROVIDE INFORMATION
 SHOWING HOW COMPLYING WITH THE HEAT REQUIREMENTS. PLANS
 DON'T SHOW LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED HEATING UNIT.
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. NEED TO INDICATE
 PROPOSED LOCATION FOR THE HEATING/COOLING UNIT.
 COMPLETE A/C PLANS AND EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS
 MAY BE SUBMITTED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT BUT EQUIPMENT
 LOCATION NEEDS TO BE SHOWN ON PLANS.
  
 3- TWO STORY WALL SECTION ON SHEET A-2:
 A) REVISE ROOF SHEATHING FASTENING TYPE AND SPACING.
 SEE SEC. R803. 2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
 REPEAT COMMENT. ENGINEER NOW SPECIFIED "8D CORREGATED
 NAILS 4" @ EDGE 9" ELSEWHERE". CLEARLY IDENTIFY WHAT'S
 A 8D CORREGATED NAIL. ALSO, TYPE OF NAIL AND SPACING
 LOOKS LESS STRONGER THAN THE MINIMUM REQUIRED BY SEC.
 R803.2.3.1. ENGINEER TO PROVIDE CALCULATIONS SHOWING
 THAT THE PROPOSED NAIL TYPE AND SPACING IS EQUAL OR
 BETTER THAN THE REQUIRED BY CODE.
 SEC. 107.2.1.3 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 B) REVISE ROOF FRAMING FASTENERS. R301.1
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 REPEAT COMMENT. FASTENERS SPECIFIED NOW DON'T MATCH
 FASTENERS SPECIFIED ON THE REVISED ROOF FRAMING PLAN.
  
 C) SPECIFY ROOF INSULATION. SEC. R103.2 FBC-ENERGY
 CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014).
 REPEAT COMMENT. ENGINEER SPECIFIED R-30 ROOF
 INSULATION. CLEARLY SPECIFIED WHAT KIND OF INSULATION
 IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED. IF USING R-30 BATT
 INSULATION, THEN IT CAN NOT BE USED BECAUSE R-30 BATT
 INSULATION DOESN'T FIT ON 2 X 8 ROOF RAFTERS. THE
 THICKNESS OF R-30 BATT IS ABOUT 9-1/2". IN ADDITION IT
 DOESN'T ALLOW THE 1" SPACE BETWEEN INSULATION AND ROOF
 SHEATHING REQUIRED BY SEC. R806.3 FOR VENTILATION.
 REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 D) CLARIFY HOW THE SPECIFIED ROOF VENTILATION PROVIDE
 CROSS VENTILATION TO ENTIRE ROOF AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 R806 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 REPEAT COMMENT. ENGINEER SPECIFIED 2" HOLE WITH SCREEN
 COVER FOR VENT EVERY OTHER RAFTER @ EA. END. THIS ONLY
 PROVIDES VENTILATION AT EVERY OTHER RAFTER. WHAT ABOUT
 CROSS VENTILATION FOR THE OTHER RAFTERS? .
  
 NEW COMMENTS BASED ON REVISED 2 STORY WALL SECTION:
 E) A) WHAT'S IS THE "2 X 2 BELOW" SHOWN ON THE SECOND
 FLOOR BY THE ROOF AREA?. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 F) ENGINEER SPECIFIED 2" HOLE WITH SCREEN COVER FOR
 VENT EVERY OTHER RAFTER @ EA. END. PROVIDE
 SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW THE PROPOSED HOLES PROVIDE
 WATER RESISTANCE FROM THE WIND DRIVEN RAIN. SEC.
 R703.1.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 G) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
 CONSTRUCTION OF THE ROOF EAVE SHOWN N ON REVISED PLANS.
 SPECIFY ALL FRAMING MEMBERS AND FASTENERS. SEC. R301.1
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 H) NEED TO SPECIFY ROOF GUTTERS AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 R318.5 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND
 SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE INSTALLATION OF ROOF GUTTERS.
 NOTE: COORDINATE WITH ITEM #3(G) ABOVE.
  
 I) SPECIFY ON PLANS THE ROOF SLOPE AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 R905.11.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 4- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED;
 A) NEED TO PROVIDE THE NAME OF THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE
 FOR THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 R405.4.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014).
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. NEED THE NAME OF
 THE PERSON WHO PREPARED THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. ONLY A
 SIGNATURE WAS PROVIDED. SIGNATURE IS NOT A NAME. UNABLE
 TO IDENTIFY WHO PREPARED THEM.
  
 B) CEILING INSULATION ITEM #10. NEW PLANS CALL FOR 2 X
 8 ROOF JOISTS. R30 BATT INSULATION DOESN'T FIT ON A 2 X
 8 SPACE. BATT INSULATION IS +/- 9-1/2" THICK. IN
 ADDITION L NEED AT LEAST 1" CLEAR SPACE FOR CROSS
 VENTILATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R103.2 FBC-ENERGY
 CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014).
 REPEAT COMMENT. THIS NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE
 ENGINEER OF RECORD. PLANS NEED TO BE REVISED. REVISE
 THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ONCE THE PLANS ARE REVISED TO
 COMPLY WITH THE INSULATION AND VENTILATION
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 C) SIZE OF A/C UNIT SHOWN ON ITEM #12 SEEMS TO BE TOO
 SMALL FOR THE SIZE OF THE APARTMENT. THIS ITEM NEEDS TO
 BE COORDINATED WITH THE A/C EQUIPMENT SIZING
 CALCULATIONS. SEC. R403.6.1 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION,
 5TH EDITION (2014).
 REPEAT COMMENT. SIZE OF EQUIPMENT SPECIFIED ON PREVIOUS
 ENERGY CALCULATIONS WAS TOO BIG NOW SIZE SPECIFIED
 SEEMS TO BE TOO SMALL. THIS NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED
 BEFORE REVISING THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS.
  
 D) ROOF MATERIAL SPECIFIED ON PAGE 2 OF 4 DOESN'T MATCH
 PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R103.2 FBC-ENERGY
 CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014).
 REPEAT COMMENT. ROOF MATERIAL IS NOT COMPOSITION
 SHINGLES. THIS IS A FLAT ROOF. SEE PLANS AND PRODUCT
 APPROVALS SUBMITTED AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 NOTE:
 LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR AND
 SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WILL
 BE REQUIRED AT TIME OF INSPECTION WHEN ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS ARE NOT USING THE DEFAULT FACTOR FOR
 GLAZING.
  
 5- FLAT ROOF NOA 14-1030.02 SUBMITTED.
 PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS AS
 REQUIRED BY GENERAL LIMITATION #7 ON LAST PAGE OF NOA.
 REPEAT COMMENT. CALCULATIONS WERE REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS
 COMMENTS IF THE SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE
 DESIGN PRESSURES FOR ALL ROOF ZONES. CALCULATIONS
 REQUIRED TO MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 6- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO
 LOW BASED ON ALL THE NEW SCOPE OF WORK. VALUATION TO
 INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND
 PROFIT AND ALL DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES. REVISE
 VALUATION AS REQUIRED. PROVIDE COPY OF PROPERLY SIGNED
 CONTRACT FOR BUILDING OFFICIAL REVIEW/APPROVAL. NOTE:
 INCLUDE THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES.
 REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL.
  
 NEW COMMENTS BASED ON REVISED DRAWINGS SUBMITTED:
 7- ROOF TYPE SHOWN ON THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ON NEW
 SHEET E-1 DON'T MATCH ROOF TYPE SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED
 ROOF PLAN ON SHEET A-1. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 8- STAIRS SHOWN ON THE NORTH ELEVATION, EAST ELEVATION
 ON SHEET E-1 AND GROUND FLOOR PLAN, SECOND FLOOR PLAN
 ON SHEET A-1 DON'T MAKE SENSE. NUMBER OF STEPS SHOWN
 AND THE WAY THEY ARE DRAWN DON'T MAKE ANY SENSE. THEY
 ARE NOT PROPERLY DRAWN. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC.
 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 9- SCOPE OF WORK ON SHEET A-1 SPECIFIES "SAWCUT FLOOR
 FOR NEW FOOTING REQUIRED". PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND
 SPECIFICATIONS FOR THIS SCOPE OF WORK. SEC. R301.1
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 NOTE:
 ENGINEER TO PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH
 COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 BUILDING DIVISION
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 6 Status F Date 2016-08-24 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2016-08-23 Time 15:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2016-08-23 Time 15:31 Sent To P
Notes
2016-08-23 15:32:24RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, SIXTH BUILDING REVIEW
 CHECKLIST. (REAR BUILDING).
 CODE: FBC-5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 ****NOTE: SCOPE OF WORK WAS COMPLETELY REVISED.
  
 1- INFORMATION SUBMITTED IN THE DESIGN CRITERIA IS NOT
 CLEAR. CLARIFY WHAT IS THE EXTERNAL = -0.9, INTERNAL -
 0.2 AND NET UPLIFT COEFFICIENT=1.1 AND WHERE WERE ARE
 THEM TAKEN FROM. ALSO, CLEARLY SPECIFY IF THE WIND LOAD
 SPECIFIED IS THE ULTIMATE WIND LOAD OR NOMINAL WIND
 LOAD. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS AND SEC. R301.1
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 2- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
 NEW BELL FOOTING SPECIFIED ON THE GROUND FLOOR PLAN.
 CLEARLY SPECIFY WHAT'S THE PURPOSE OF THIS FOOTING.
 WHAT IS IT REINFORCING? SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 3- ROOF FRAMING PLAN SPECIFIES EMBEDDED STRAP OR
 SIMPSON MSTM16. THERE IS THE OPTION TO USE EITHER THE
 EXISTING STRAP OR TO INSTALL A NEW ONE. CLEARLY SPECIFY
 EXISTING STRAP TO VERIFY IF THE STRAP WILL MEET THE
 DESIGN PRESSURES REQUIRED FOR ON CURRENT CODE. SEC.
 R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 NOTE: IT LOOKS LIKE THERE IS A TYPO ON THE SPECIFIED
 STRAP. DO YOU MEAN MTSM16?. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 4- SIZE OF SECOND FLOOR BEDROOM EGRESS WINDOW IS NOT
 CLEAR. LEGEND CALLS EXISTING WINDOW #11 AS 52"X50
 JALOUSIE WINDOW; REPLACEMENT WINDOW #11 AS 52" X 53
 5/8" IMPACT EGRESS WINDOW; WHILE SECOND FLOOR PLAN
 CALLS WINDOW #11 AS 36X 53 5/8" EGRESS. REVISE AS
 REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 5- SEC. R303.9 REQUIRES HEATING. PROVIDE INFORMATION
 SHOWING HOW COMPLYING WITH THE HEAT REQUIREMENTS. PLANS
 DON'T SHOW LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED HEATING UNIT.
  
 6- DETAIL "C" ON SHEET A-2. SPECIFY SIZE OF EXISTING
 FOOTING. CLARIFY HOW THE ENGINEER KNOWS THAT EXISTING
 FOOTING IS ADEQUATE FOR THE NEW PROPOSED CONCENTRATED
 LOAD. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 7- TWO STORY WALL SECTION ON SHEET A-2:
 A) REVISE ROOF SHEATHING FASTENING TYPE AND SPACING.
 SEE SEC. R803. 2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL AND REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
  
 B) REVISE ROOF FRAMING STRAPS. SEE ITEM # 3 ABOVE. SEC.
 R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 C) THERE ARE NO SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE THE SECOND FLOOR
 MATERIALS (SUBFLOORING AND FINISH FLOORING). SEC.
 R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 D) THERE ARE NO SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROOF, WALL AND
 SECOND FLOOR INSULATION. COORDINATE WITH THE ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED. SEC. R103.2 FBC-ENERGY
 CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 E) GARAGE CEILING SPECIFICATIONS DON'T MATCH
 SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON THE GROUND FLOOR ON SHEET A-1.
 SEC. R302.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 F) CLARIFY HOW THE SPECIFIED ROOF VENTILATION PROVIDE
 CROSS VENTILATION TO ENTIRE ROOF AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 R806 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
  
 8- REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED:
 A) NEED TO PROVIDE THE NAME OF THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE
 FOR THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 R405.4.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 B) ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED FORM 405-10 ARE FOR
 THE 2010 CODE. THE CURRENT CODE IS FBC-5TH EDITION
 (2014). NEED TO PROVIDE CURRENT FORM 405-2014. SEC. 553
 FLORIDA STATUTE.
  
 C) CEILING INSULATION ITEM #10. NEW PLANS CALL FOR 2 X
 8 ROOF JOISTS. R30 BATT INSULATION DOESN'T FIT ON A 2 X
 8 SPACE. BATT INSULATION IS +/- 9-1/2" THICK. IN
 ADDITION WILL NEED AT LEAST 1" CLEAR SPACE FOR CROSS
 VENTILATION. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R103.2 FBC-ENERGY
 CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 D) SIZE OF A/C UNIT SHOWN ON ITEM #12 SEEMS TO BE TOO
 LARGE FOR THE SIZE OF THE APARTMENT. THIS ITEM NEEDS TO
 BE COORDINATED WITH THE A/C EQUIPMENT SIZING
 CALCULATIONS. SEC. R403.6.1 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION,
 5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 F) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR THE NEW ELECTRIC
 WATER HEATER ITEM #14. SPECIFY SIZE AND EFFICIENCY.
 SEC. R403.4.4 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION
 (2014).
  
 G) ROOF MATERIAL SPECIFIED ON PAGE 2 OF 4 DOESN'T MATCH
 PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED. NOTE: GRAVEL IS NOT ALLOWED.
 SEC. R103.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION
 (2014).
  
 H) THE ATTIC VENT RATIO SHOWN ON PAGE 2 OF 5 IS 1/300.
 SEC. R806.2 REQUIRES 1/150 RATIO. REVISE AS REQUIRED OR
 PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF SEC. R806.2.
  
 I) WINDOWS AREA AND ORIENTATION SHOWING ON PAGE 3 OF 5
 DOESN'T MATCH ACTUAL WINDOW AREA AND ORIENTATION SHOWN
 ON PLANS. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. R103.2
 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 NOTE:
 LABEL FOR WINDOWS AND DOORS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR AND
 SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WILL
 BE REQUIRED WHEN ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT USING THE
 DEFAULT FACTOR FOR GLAZING.
  
 9- PROVIDE DETAIL AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONCRETE
 BLOCK WALL INSULATION R VALUE SPECIFIED ON THE ENERGY
 CALCULATIONS. COORDINATE WITH ENERGY CALCULATIONS. SEC.
 R103.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 10- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING
 HOW OBTAINING THE R8 VALUE ON THE DUCTS AS SPECIFIED ON
 ITEM #11 OF THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. SEC. R103.2
 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 11- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL ( 2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY
 FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR:
 A) NEW FLAT ROOF AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. AND CLEARLY
 MARK WHICH APPROVED ASSEMBLY IS GOING TO BE INSTALLED
 TO VERIFY THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL.
 NOTE: IF SELECTED ASSEMBLY DOESN'T MEET THE DESIGN
 PRESSURES, THEN SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS
 WILL BE REQUIRED. SEE LIMITATIONS ON PRODUCT APPROVAL.
  
 B) ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS
 AND DETAILS. PROVIDE ONLY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL
 COVER PAGE AND PAGE SHOWING THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR OR
 LIST THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NEXT TO EACH
 SPECIFIED CONNECTOR.
  
 12- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE ABOVE
 PRODUCT APPROVAL PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 13- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO
 LOW BASED ON ALL THE NEW SCOPE OF WORK. VALUATION TO
 INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND
 PROFIT AND ALL DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES. REVISE
 VALUATION AS REQUIRED. A COPY OF PROPERLY SIGNED
 CONTRACT MAY BE SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING OFFICIAL
 REVIEW/APPROVAL. NOTE: INCLUDE THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL
 FEES.
  
 NOTE: ON JUNE 23RD I MET WITH DANIEL MOSS (ENGINEER) TO
 GO OVER THE COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS CHECKLISTS. INFORMED
 HIM ABOUT DRAFTSMAN'S DEFICIENCIES IN DRAWINGS.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2016-05-10 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2016-05-10 Time 16:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2016-05-10 Time 16:37 Sent To  
Notes
2016-05-10 16:38:24RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, FIFTH BUILDING REVIEW
 CHECKLIST. (REAR BUILDING).
 CODE: FBC-5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 *****NOTE: ACCORDING TO FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B)
 ENGINEER OF RECORD MAY BE CHARGED FOUR TIMES THE PLAN
 REVIEW FEE EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD REVIEW IS
 REJECTED.
  
  
 1- PLANS SHOW NEW OPENINGS FOR GARAGE OVERHEAD DOORS.
 PROVIDE COMPLETE FRAMING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
 THE NEW GARAGE DOORS. SPECIFY REINFORCEMENT AT THE ENDS
 OF EACH OPENING. SPECIFY LINTEL OR BEAM, SPECIFY
 STRUCTURAL BUCK ATTACHMENT, ETC. SEC. R301 OF
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 RESPONSE: A) DETAIL SUBMITTED DOESN'T PROVIDE COMPLETE
 STRUCTURAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE REINFORCEMENT AT THE
 ENDS OF EACH OPENING. IT ONLY SPECIFIES "SAWCUT CMU TO
 ALLOW (2)#5 R.B. VERT. FTG, TO BM. TYP. EA. GARAGE DOOR
 W/SET22 EPOXY". THIS SPECIFICATION IS VERY DEFICIENT.
 IT DOESN'T SPECIFY HOW THE CMU CELLS ARE FILLED AND HOW
 MUCH EMBEDMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THE REBARS. ALSO, A NEW
 OPENING WAS CREATED FOR THE SECOND GARAGE DOOR.
 ACCORDING TO THE PROPERTY APPRAISER STREET VIEW OF THIS
 BUILDING, THERE IS A WINDOW WHERE THE SECOND GARAGE
 DOOR IS PROPOSED TO BE INSTALLED. THE EXISTING WINDOW
 OPENING IS NOT THE SAME SIZE AS THE PROPOSED GARAGE
 DOOR OPENING. THE GARAGE DOOR BUCK DETAIL SUBMITTED
 SPECIFIES EXISTING CONCRETE HEADER BEAM. IT LOOKS LIKE
 THE EXISTING HEADER BEAM SIZE MAY NOT BE LONG ENOUGH TO
 COVER THE NEW OPENING AND HOW THE ENGINEER KNOWS THAT
 EXISTING HEADER IS STRONG ENOUGH TO SUPPORT THE
 PROPOSED LOAD?. ENGINEER OF RECORD TO PROVIDE COMPLETE
 AND CLEAR STRUCTURAL SPECIFICATIONS THAT REFLECT THE
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONDITIONS.
  
 NOTE: SECOND FLOOR PLAN SHOWS AN "EXISTING CMU WALL"
 DIVIDING THE LIVING AREA AND THE BEDROOM. IT LOOKS
 UNUSUAL TO HAVE AN INTERIOR MASONRY WALL ON THE SECOND
 FLOOR. CLARIFY IF THIS IS A TRUE MASONRY WALL. IF SO,
 THEN PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW THE BEAM FOR
 THE NEW GARAGE DOOR OPENING BELOW IS REINFORCED TO
 SUPPORT THE WALL ABOVE. SEC. R301.1
  
 B) ANCHOR SPECIFICATIONS SHOWN ON THE GARAGE DOOR BUCK
 DETAIL AND THE NEW GARAGE DOOR BUCK DETAIL "C" DON'T
 MATCH. REVISE SIZE AND SPACING. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 C) NEW GARAGE DOOR BUCK DETAIL "C" IS NOT DRAWN TO
 SCALE. PROVIDE DETAIL DRAWN TO SCALE SO CORRECT NUMBER
 OF ANCHORS ARE SHOWN. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 2- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED:
 A) OWNER/AGENT TO CERTIFY BOTTOM OF FORM AS REQUIRED BY
 SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION
 (2014).
  
 B) PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM,
 INCLUDING NAME OF BUILDER, PERMIT OFFICE. SEC.
 R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION
 (2014).
  
 ****ENGINEER OF RECORD TO PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER
 ADDRESSING EACH COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2016-04-06 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2016-04-06 Time 17:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2016-04-06 Time 17:47 Sent To P
Notes
2016-04-06 17:49:43RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, FOURTH BUILDING REVIEW
 CHECKLIST. (REAR BUILDING).
 CODE: FBC-5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 *****NOTE: ACCORDING TO FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B)
 ENGINEER OF RECORD MAY BE CHARGED FOUR TIMES THE PLAN
 REVIEW FEE EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD REVIEW.
  
  
 1- PLANS SHOW NEW OPENINGS FOR GARAGE OVERHEAD DOORS.
 PROVIDE COMPLETE FRAMING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
 THE NEW GARAGE DOORS. SPECIFY REINFORCEMENT AT THE ENDS
 OF EACH OPENING. SPECIFY LINTEL OR BEAM, SPECIFY
 STRUCTURAL BUCK ATTACHMENT, ETC. SEC. R301 OF
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 RESPONSE: A) DETAIL SUBMITTED DOESN'T PROVIDE ANY
 STRUCTURAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE REINFORCEMENT AT THE
 ENDS OF EACH OPENING. THERE ARE NO SPECIFICATIONS
 SHOWING HOW THE EXISTING MASONRY WALLS ARE REINFORCED
 TO RECEIVE THE LOADS OF THE NEW GARAGE DOORS.
  
 B) SPECIFY HOW MUCH EMBEDMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THE 1/2
 ANCHOR BOLTS SPECIFIED ON THE GARAGE DOOR BUCK DETAIL.
 SEC. R301 OF FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 2- PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED
 BY SEC. R101.4.3 OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH
 EDITION (2014).
 NOTE: ONLY THE FRONT BUILDING IS CONTRIBUTING HISTORIC
 BUILDING. THE REAR BUILDING IS NOT. THEREFORE, IT'S NOT
 EXEMPT FROM THE ENERGY CODE.
  
 RESPONSE: RESPONSE LETTER STATES "A/C & HEAT UNDER
 SEPARATE PERMIT W/ ENERGY CALCULATIONS". THIS DOESN'T
 ADDRESS THE COMMENT. ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND A/C & HEAT
 CALCULATIONS ARE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS. THE INFORMATION
 FOR THE A/C & HEAT CALCULATIONS ALONG WITH THE A/C
 PLANS MAY BE SUBMITTED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT BUT THE
 ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE SUBMITTED NOW.
  
 3- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
 DWELLING/GARAGE FIRE SEPARATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 R302.6 OF FBC RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 RESPONSE: SPECIFICATIONS ON PLANS DOESN'T SPECIFY THE
 TYPE OF GYPSUM WALL BOARD AS REQUIRED BY TABLE R302.6
 OF FBC RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 ****ENGINEER OF RECORD TO PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER
 ADDRESSING EACH COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2016-02-16 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2016-02-16 Time 17:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2016-02-16 Time 16:41 Sent To  
Notes
2016-02-16 16:43:56RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, THIRD BUILDING REVIEW
 CHECKLIST. (REAR BUILDING).
 CODE: FBC-5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 NOTE:
 PLANS WERE REVISED. NEW SCOPE OF WORK IS SHOWN.
 COMMENTS BELOW ARE BASED ON THE NEW PLANS PROVIDED.
  
 1- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION. REVISE
 VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL THE SCOPE OF WORK SHOWN ON
 PLANS. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS,
 CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND THE DESIGN
 PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY
 AMENDMENTS.
  
 2- PLANS SHOW NEW OPENINGS FOR GARAGE OVERHEAD DOORS.
 PROVIDE COMPLETE FRAMING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
 THE NEW GARAGE DOORS. SPECIFY REINFORCEMENT AT THE ENDS
 OF EACH OPENING. SPECIFY LINTEL OR BEAM, SPECIFY
 STRUCTURAL BUCK ATTACHMENT, ETC. SEC. R301 OF
 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 3- ACCORDING TO NEW PLANS PROVIDED, THIS IS ALTERATION
 LEVEL 3 NOT ALTERATION LEVEL 2. REVISE DESIGN CRITERIA
 INFORMATION AS REQUIRED. SEC. 505 OF FBC-EXISTING
 BUILDING, 5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 4- PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED
 BY SEC. R101.4.3 OF FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH
 EDITION (2014).
 NOTE: ONLY THE FRONT BUILDING IS CONTRIBUTING HISTORIC
 BUILDING. THE REAR BUILDING IS NOT. THEREFORE, IT'S NOT
 EXEMPT FROM THE ENERGY CODE.
  
 5- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY
 FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR THE INSWING DOOR SHOWN ON THE
 FIRST FLOOR PLAN.
  
 6- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO APPROVE ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS
 AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS.
  
 7- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
 DWELLING/GARAGE FIRE SEPARATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC.
 R302.6 OF FBC RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 8- PROVIDE INFORMATION SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE
 HEATING REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R303.9 OF FBC RESIDENTIAL,
 5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 9- SHOW CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS WITHIN 10 FEET OF
 SLEEPING ROOMS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R315.1. NOTE: THERE
 IS A NEW GARAGE BELOW THE DWELLING UNIT.
  
 ****ENGINEER OF RECORD TO PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER
 ADDRESSING EACH COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-11-10 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-11-10 Time 16:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-11-10 Time 07:29 Sent To E
Notes
2015-11-10 07:47:07RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW
 CHECKLIST. (REAR BUILDING).
 CODE: FBC-5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 1- CLEARLY SPECIFY THE TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING
 BEDROOM WINDOWS AND TYPE AND SIZE OF PROPOSED BEDROOM
 WINDOWS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS
 REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 701.2 OF FBC-EXISTING BUILDING,
 5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 RESPONSE: PLANS SUBMITTED DON'T IDENTIFY THE BEDROOMS
 ON FIRST AND SECOND FLOOR. FLOOR PLANS SUBMITTED DON'T
 IDENTIFY THE TYPE AND ACTUAL SIZE OF THE PROPOSED
 WINDOW TO BE INSTALLED. UNABLE TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS.
  
 ALSO, CLARIFY NOTE LOCATED AT THE BOTTOM LEFT OF
 DRAWING SUBMITTED; "1ST FLOOR EXISTING WINDOW ARE FIXED
 GLASS".
 CLEARLY IDENTIFY ALL ROOMS ON THE FIRST FLOOR TO VERIFY
 WHY THE WINDOWS HAVE FIXED GLASS. ALSO, IDENTIFY ALL
 ROOMS ON THE SECOND FLOOR.
  
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-09-21 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2015-09-21 Time 17:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2015-09-21 Time 17:25 Sent To E
Notes
2015-09-21 17:58:06RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS
 (REAR BUILDING).
 CODE: FBC-5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 1- THE CURRENT CODE IS THE FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION
 (2014) NOT THE 2010 FBC. ENGINEER TO REVISE ALL DESIGN
 CRITERIA AS REQUIRED.
  
 2- CLEARLY SPECIFY THE TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING
 BEDROOM WINDOWS AND TYPE AND SIZE OF PROPOSED BEDROOM
 WINDOWS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS
 REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 701.2 OF FBC-EXISTING BUILDING,
 5TH EDITION (2014).
  
 3- A) ENGINEER TO REVISE THE WINDOWS AND DOORS DESIGN
 PRESSURES CALCULATIONS. ACCORDING TO SEC. R301.2.1.4.3
 OF FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014) THIS BUILDING IS
 LOCATED IN EXPOSURE "C" NOT "B".
  
 B) ENGINEER TO PROVIDE THE ENGINEER SEAL ON THE WINDOWS
 AND DOORS DESIGN PRESSURES CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY
 CHAPTER 471 F.S.
  
 C) WINDOWS AND DOORS NUMBERS GIVEN ON THE ENGINEER
 DESIGN PRESSURES CALCULATIONS DON'T MATCH THE NUMBERS
 SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH.
 SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. ALSO, COORDINATE THE
 PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBERS WITH THE REVISED PRODUCT
 APPROVALS. SEE COMMENT #4 BELOW.
  
 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY
 FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR:
 A) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS. FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL
 FL14604-R3 SUBMITTED IS NOT APPROVED. THE APPLICATION
 STATUS SAYS "RE-APPLY". ALSO, NEED TO PROVIDE PRODUCT
 APPROVAL FOR THE CURRENT CODE VERSION OF 2014.
  
 B) EXTERIOR DOORS. FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL15558
 SUBMITTED IS FOR 2010 CODE VERSION. NEED TO PROVIDE
 PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE CURRENT CODE VERSION OF 2014.
  
 ****PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH
 COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT
 JULIO GOMEZ
 COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 (561)805-6712
 [email protected]
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 7 Status P Date 2017-03-21 Cont ID  
Sent By vperez Date 2017-03-21 Time 09:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vperez Date 2017-03-21 Time 09:17 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 6 Status F Date 2017-01-11 Cont ID  
Sent By mvaldes Date 2017-01-11 Time 16:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mvaldes Date 2017-01-11 Time 15:03 Sent To  
Notes
2017-01-11 16:47:37MARIO VALDES
 ELECTRICAL PLAN EXAMINER
 561-805-6713
 [email protected]
  
  
 1] PROVIDE AN ELECTRICAL SCOPE OF WORK. FBC 107
  
 2] SHOW A/C EQUIPMENT LOCATION TO VERIFY DISCONNECT.
 FBC-R SECTION E4101.5
  
 3] GARAGE DOOR OPENER RECEPTACLE OUTLET TO BE GFCI
 PROTECTED. FBC-R SECTION E3902.2
  
 4] ADD AN INTERSYSTEM BONDING TERMINAL TO THE RISER
 DIAGRAM. FBC-R SECTION E3609.3
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2016-08-24 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2016-08-24 Time 16:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2016-08-24 Time 14:34 Sent To  
Notes
2016-08-24 16:16:17ELECTRICAL REVIEW NOTES
 REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH:
 5TH EDITION FBC 2014 & NFPA 70 2011 (NEC)
  
 PROJECT NAME:
 JOB ADDRESS: 354 MARLBORO PL. REAR
 DESCRIPTION: INTERIOR RENOVATIONS OF REAR BLDG.
 MASTER PERMIT: 15070952
  
 BELOW PLEASE FIND A LIST OF REQUIRED CORRECTIONS.
 ADDITIONAL CORRECTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED AFTER REVIEW OF
 SUBMITTED CORRECTIONS.
  
 1. CORRECT THE TITLE BLOCK TO INCLUDE THE ELECTRICAL
 WORK. ACCORDING TO THE EXISTING TITLE BLOCK, NO
 ELECTRICAL WORK IS TO BE DONE.
 2. PROVIDE A SITE PLAN SHOWING THE LOCATION OF THE FPL
 UTILITY POLE AND SERVICE DROP TO THE METER. INCLUDE THE
 MAIN SERVICE DISCONNECT.
 3. NEC 215.5: A RISER DIAGRAM SHOWING FEEDER DETAILS
 ALONG WITH RESPECTIVE LOAD CALCS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
 THIS DIAGRAM SHALL INCLUDE CONDUCTOR SIZING AND
 INSULATION TYPE. FURTHERMORE, IT SHALL BE SITE
 SPECIFIC.
 4. FBC-RE E3705.8/NEC240.24(B): READY ACCESS FOR
 OCCUPANTS. EACH OCCUPANT SHALL HAVE READY ACCESS TO ALL
 OVERCURRENT DEVICES PROTECTING THE CONDUCTORS SUPPLYING
 THAT OCCUPANCY. THE SUBMITTED DRAWINGS SHOW THE
 ELECTRICAL PANEL IN THE GARAGE WITH NO DIRECT ACCESS TO
 THE UPPER BLDG.
 5. FBC-RE 3903.3/NEC 210.70: ILLUMINATION FOR THE
 STAIRWAY IS REQUIRED. FURTHERMORE, THE STAIRWAY
 LIGHTING SHALL BE CONTROLLED FROM BOTH TOP AND BOTTOM
 UNLESS AUTOMATIC CONTROL IS INSTALLED.
 6. FBC-R3706.2 NEC 408.4(A) REQUIRES THAT YOU PROVIDE A
 PANEL SCHEDULE OR CIRCUIT DIRECTORY LEGIBLY INDICATING
 THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE OF EVERY CIRCUIT.
 7. E3601.6.2: SERVICE DISCONNECT LOCATION. THE SERVICE
 DISCONNECTING MEANS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT A READILY
 ACCESSIBLE LOCATION EITHER OUTSIDE OF A BUILDING OR
 INSIDE NEAREST THE POINT OF ENTRANCE OF THE SERVICE
 CONDUCTORS. SERVICE DISCONNECTING MEANS SHALL NOT BE
 INSTALLED IN BATHROOMS. EACH OCCUPANT SHALL HAVE ACCESS
 TO THE DISCONNECT SERVING THE DWELLING UNIT IN WHICH
 THEY RESIDE. INDICATE IF THE PANEL IS MAIN LUG ONLY OR
 MAIN BREAKER.
 8. R404.1: LIGHTING EQUIPMENT (MANDATORY). A MINIMUM OF
 75 PERCENT OF THE LAMPS IN PERMANENTLY INSTALLED
 LIGHTING FIXTURES SHALL BE HIGH-EFFICACY LAMPS OR A
 MINIMUM OF 75 PERCENT OF THE PERMANENTLY INSTALLED
 LIGHTING FIXTURES SHALL CONTAIN ONLY HIGH EFFICACY
 LAMPS.
 9. R303.9: REQUIRED HEATING. WHEN THE WINTER DESIGN
 TEMPERATURE IN TABLE R301.2(1) IS BELOW 60?F (16?C),
 EVERY DWELLING UNIT SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH HEATING
 FACILITIES CAPABLE OF MAINTAINING A MINIMUM ROOM
 TEMPERATURE OF 68?F (20?C) AT A POINT 3 FEET (914 MM)
 ABOVE THE FLOOR AND 2 FEET (610 MM) FROM EXTERIOR WALLS
 IN ALL HABITABLE ROOMS AT THE DESIGN TEMPERATURE. THE
 INSTALLATION OF ONE OR MORE PORTABLE SPACE HEATERS
 SHALL NOT BE USED TO ACHIEVE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS
 SECTION. THEREFORE HEAT SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR FINAL
 INSPECTION.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, FOR A QUICKER RETURN ON YOUR
 RE-SUBMITTAL, PLEASE PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER
 (NARRATIVE) ADDRESSING EACH ITEM AND THE PAGE NUMBER
 WHERE THE CORRECTIONS APPEAR ALONG WITH THE STANDARD
 CITY RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT
 CORRECTED PAGES INTO THE SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. MARK VOID
 AND LEAVE THE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS FOR
 COMPARATIVE REVIEW. CLOUDING THE CHANGES WILL BE
 GREATLY APPRECIATED.
  
 IF YOU HAVE FURTHER QUESTIONS, PLEASE DON?T HESITATE TO
 CONTACT ME DIRECTLY.
 THANK YOU,
 MIKE ALBARRAN
 ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 PH: 561-805-6746
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
2016-08-24 10:35:25NEW REVISED DRAWINGS SUBMITTED
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2016-08-11 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2016-08-11 Time 19:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2016-08-11 Time 18:50 Sent To  
Notes
2016-08-11 19:06:24ELECTRICAL REVIEW PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY MARIO VALDEZ
 ON 2/17/16. NO ADDITIONAL ELECTRICAL SCOPE SUBMITTED.
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2016-02-17 Cont ID  
Sent By mvaldes Date 2016-02-17 Time 14:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mvaldes Date 2016-02-17 Time 14:34 Sent To  
Notes
2016-02-17 14:38:262014 5TH FBC ED. NEC 2011/RESIDENTIAL
 MARIO VALDES
 ELECTRICAL PLAN EXAMINER
 516-805-6713
 [email protected]
  
  
 PASSED WITH A PROVISO
  
  
 - TAMPER RESISTANT RECEPTACLES REQUIRED PER NEC 406.11
 - SMOKE/CARBON ALARMS REQUIRED PER RESIDENTIAL CODE
 SECTIONS 314 & 315
 - AFCI PROTECTION REQUIRED PER NEC 210.12 B
2016-02-16 17:38:39NEW PLANS WITH ELECTRICAL WORK SHOWN. JG.
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2015-11-19 Cont ID  
Sent By mvaldes Date 2015-11-19 Time 11:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mvaldes Date 2015-11-19 Time 11:34 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-09-22 Cont ID  
Sent By skennedy Date 2015-09-22 Time 15:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By skennedy Date 2015-09-22 Time 15:48 Sent To HIST
Notes
2015-09-22 15:48:321ST REVIEW: FBC 2014 5TH ED.
  
 THERE ARE TWO APPLICATIONS ONE FOR A FRONT BUILDING AND
 ONE FOR A REAR BUILDING, BUT THE PLAN IS ONLY FOR ONE
 BUILDING. ACCORDINGLY, I CANNOT DETERMINE THE SCOPE OF
 WORK.
  
 THE APPLICABLE ELECTRICAL CODE IN THE A FUNCTION OF THE
 BASE CODE CITED ABOVE. PLEASE REVISE PLAN TO INDICATE
 THE APPLIED CODE IN EFFECT.
  
 A LOAD CALCULATION IS PROVIDED BUT IT IS UNKNOW IF IT
 APPLIES TO ONR OR BOTH BUILDINGS/
  
 THE RANGE CUICUIT SHOWN IS 40AMP, PROVIDE APPLIANCE
 INFORMATION TO DEMONSTRATE ADEQUACY OF THIS OCP.
 E4101.4 OVERCURRENT PROTECTION.
 EACH APPLIANCE SHALL BE PROTECTED AGAINST OVERCURRENT
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RATING OF THE APPLIANCE AND ITS
 LISTING.
  
 INFORMATION PROVIDE IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW FOR FULL
 REVIEW.
  
 STEVEN KENNEDY, CBO
 CHIEF PLANS EXAMINER
 (561) 805-6710
 [email protected]
Review Stop HIST HISTORICAL
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2017-01-30 Cont ID  
Sent By fmittner Date 2017-01-30 Time 14:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fmittner Date 2017-01-30 Time 14:38 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop HIST HISTORICAL
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2016-08-24 Cont ID  
Sent By fmittner Date 2016-08-24 Time 09:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fmittner Date 2016-08-24 Time 09:06 Sent To  
Notes
2016-08-24 09:08:21ROOF STYLE CHANGE REQUIRES COA. SECOND FLOOR DOOR LEADS
 TO NO WHERE. INCOMPLETE/INCOHERANT DRAWINGS SUBMITTED.
 PLEASE REVISE AND ALSO SUBMIT ELEVATIONS. QUESTIONS,
 CONTACT FRIEDERIKE MITTNER, CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION
 PLANNER AT 822-1457.
Review Stop HIST HISTORICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2016-02-10 Cont ID  
Sent By fmittner Date 2016-02-10 Time 11:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fmittner Date 2016-02-10 Time 11:10 Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop HIST HISTORICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2015-11-09 Cont ID  
Sent By fmittner Date 2015-11-04 Time 11:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fmittner Date 2015-11-04 Time 11:31 Sent To B
Notes
2015-11-04 11:32:38SAME COMMENTS AS BEFORE PLUS VINYL WINDOW PRODUCT
 APPROVALS SUBMITTED.
Review Stop HIST HISTORICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-08-27 Cont ID  
Sent By fmittner Date 2015-08-27 Time 10:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fmittner Date 2015-08-27 Time 10:49 Sent To  
Notes
2015-08-27 10:50:58APPLICATION DOES NOT REFLECT WINDOW GRID PATTERN,
 CONFIRMT HE WINDOWS ARE CLEAR OR LOW-E (NO TINTING) IN
 GLASS AND WHITE FRAMES. QUESTIONS CONTACT FRIEDERIKE
 MITTNER AT 822-1457.
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 8 Status N Date 2017-03-29 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2017-03-29 Time 18:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2017-03-16 Time 11:12 Sent To  
Notes
2017-03-17 11:12:52R17
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 7 Status N Date 2017-02-22 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2017-02-22 Time 14:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2016-12-13 Time 14:29 Sent To  
Notes
2016-12-14 14:29:18R13
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 6 Status N Date 2016-08-25 Cont ID  
Sent By gjohnson Date 2016-08-25 Time 09:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gjohnson Date 2016-08-09 Time 13:00 Sent To  
Notes
2016-08-09 13:00:49R28
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2016-05-11 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2016-05-11 Time 09:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2016-04-14 Time 09:25 Sent To  
Notes
2016-04-15 09:25:28R16
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2016-04-06 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2016-04-06 Time 18:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2016-03-30 Time 09:33 Sent To  
Notes
2016-03-31 09:34:08R15
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2016-02-18 Cont ID  
Sent By tklarge Date 2016-02-18 Time 03:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tklarge Date 2016-02-03 Time 15:04 Sent To  
Notes
2016-02-03 15:04:42RESUB ROUTED TO FMITTNER VIA ZONING INBOX
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2015-11-19 Cont ID  
Sent By mvaldes Date 2015-11-19 Time 11:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mvaldes Date 2015-10-08 Time 08:44 Sent To Z
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2015-10-09 Cont ID  
Sent By cpuell Date 2015-10-09 Time 08:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cpuell Date 2015-07-23 Time 08:13 Sent To  
Notes
2015-07-24 08:13:48R14
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 7 Status P Date 2017-03-27 Cont ID  
Sent By gjohnson Date 2017-03-27 Time 15:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gjohnson Date 2017-03-27 Time 11:47 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 6 Status F Date 2017-01-13 Cont ID  
Sent By gjohnson Date 2017-01-13 Time 16:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gjohnson Date 2017-01-13 Time 16:57 Sent To  
Notes
2017-01-13 16:59:071ST REVIEW
  
 GEORGE JOHNSON
 PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER LL
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
 BUILDING DIVISION
 561-805-6711
 [email protected]
  
 PLUMBING COMMENTS:
  
 SHALL COMPLY WITH ELECTRICAL AND BUILDING COMMENTS. WPB
 AMEN-TO FBC 107.2.1
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2016-08-25 Cont ID  
Sent By gjohnson Date 2016-08-25 Time 09:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gjohnson Date 2016-08-25 Time 09:11 Sent To  
Notes
2016-08-25 09:13:26 
 5TH REVIEW: FBC 2014
  
 GEORGE JOHNSON
 PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
  561-805-6711
 [email protected]
  
 PLUMBING COMMENTS: 2ND REQUEST
  
 1. SHOW LOCATION OF WASHING MACHINE ON PLAN VIEW. WPB
 AMEN. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1
  
 2. SHOW WASHING MACHINE ON RISER DIAGRAM . WPB AMEN. TO
 FBC SEC. 107.2.1
  
 3. TUB SHALL CONNECT BELOW LAVATORY. SANITARY RISER
 DIAGRAM NOT TO CODE SHALL COMPLY WITH FBC RES.
 SEC.P3101.2.1
  
 4. CLEAN OUTS REQUIRED AT THE BASE OF SOIL AND WASTE
 STACKS PER FBC RES. P3005.2.6
  
 5. PLEASE PROVIDE WATER RISER DIAGRAM. WPB AMEN. TO FBC
 SEC. 107.2.1
  
 REVIEW DONE BY GEORGE EARL 0013-B
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2016-04-26 Cont ID  
Sent By gjohnson Date 2016-04-26 Time 13:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gjohnson Date 2016-04-26 Time 13:38 Sent To  
Notes
2016-04-26 13:48:40 
 4TH REVIEW: FBC 2014
  
 GEORGE JOHNSON
 PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
  561-805-6711
 [email protected]
  
 PLUMBING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SHOW LOCATION OF WASHING MACHINE ON PLAN VIEW. WPB
 AMEN. TO FBC SEC. 107.2.1
  
 2. SHOW WASHING MACHINE ON RISER DIAGRAM . WPB AMEN. TO
 FBC SEC. 107.2.1
  
 3. SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM NOT TO CODE SHALL COMPLY WITH
 FBC RES. SEC.P3101.2.1
  
 4. CLEAN OUTS REQUIRED AT THE BASE OF SOIL AND WASTE
 STACKS PER FBC RES. P3005.2.6
  
 5. PLEASE PROVIDE WATER RISER DIAGRAM. WPB AMEN. TO FBC
 SEC. 107.2.1
  
 REVIEW DONE BY GEORGE EARL 0013-B
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2016-04-07 Cont ID  
Sent By tklarge Date 2016-04-07 Time 14:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tklarge Date 2016-04-07 Time 14:32 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2016-02-18 Cont ID  
Sent By tklarge Date 2016-02-18 Time 03:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tklarge Date 2016-02-18 Time 03:20 Sent To  
Notes
2016-02-18 03:24:281) THE APPLIANCES LOCATED ON THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE
 GARAGE SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE BY VEHICULAR
 IMPACT.
 2) SUBMIT A SANITARY AND WATER RISER DIAGRAM FOR THE
 PLUMBING THAT IS BEING ADDED IN THE GARAGE. 2014 FBC
 SEC. 107.3.5.3.
 3) SHOW THE FIXTURE CLEARANCES FOR THE FIXTURES IN THE
 NEW BATHROOM. 2014 FBCR SEC.R307.1 & R P2705.
  
 PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW
 TIM LARGE
 CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR
 561-805-6692
 [email protected]
  
  
2016-02-16 17:39:43NEW PLANS WITH PLUMBING WORK SHOWN. JG.
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2015-08-03 Cont ID  
Sent By tklarge Date 2015-08-03 Time 12:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tklarge Date 2015-08-03 Time 12:16 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2017-01-30 Cont ID  
Sent By fmittner Date 2017-01-30 Time 14:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fmittner Date 2017-01-30 Time 14:38 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2015-11-04 Cont ID  
Sent By mvaldes Date 2015-11-19 Time 11:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fmittner Date 2015-11-04 Time 11:32 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved