| 2015-05-27 08:16:09 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: |
| | |
| | 1. TWO COMPLETE SETS OF PERMIT DOCUMENTS REQUIRED, FBC |
| | 107. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW - ONLY ONE DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED. |
| | TWO REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 2. OK |
| | |
| | 3. FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL REQUIRED, |
| | FAC9N-3. THE INSERT FROM THE DOOR WAS PROVIDED. PROVIDE |
| | THE FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER SHEET WHICH |
| | SHOWS THE PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER AND STATUS |
| | (WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG). |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, PARTIAL COVER SHEETS FOR FIXED WINDOWS, |
| | EXTERIOR DOORS, PANEL WALLS (EXTERIOR INSULATION FINISH |
| | SYSTEM, FL11429). |
| | |
| | THE MIAMIDADE NOAS SUBMITTED FOR THE WINDOWS ARE |
| | INCOMPLETE. THE DRAWINGS WERE PRINTED IN A SIZE |
| | INTENDED FOR 11X17, BUT PRINTED ON 8 1/2 X 11 PAPER SO |
| | HALF OF EACH SHEET IS MISSING. PLEASE RE-PRINT |
| | PROPERLY. FL PRODUCT APPROVAL NOT REQUIRED FOR NOAS. |
| | |
| | IT IS NOT CLEAR WHERE THE FIXED WINDOWS WILL BE |
| | INSTALLED. ONLY A PARTIAL FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL WAS PROVIDED; THE REST OF THE COVER SHEET IS |
| | MISSING AS ARE THE INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS/ |
| | EVALUATION REPORT. |
| | |
| | IT IS NOT CLEAR WHERE THE EIFS SYSTEM WILL BE |
| | INSTALLED. SHEETROCK / DURAROCK DOES NOT REQUIRE A |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL AS IT IS NOT SUBJECT TO WIND LOADS. |
| | |
| | TO ADDRESS THE ABOVE ISSUES: |
| | |
| | REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE THE FIXED WINDOWS AND EIFS OR |
| | VOID THE PAGES PROVIDED IF THEY ARE NOT BEING |
| | INSTALLED. |
| | |
| | PROVIDE A SECOND COPY OF THE DOOR EVALUATION REPORT/ |
| | INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. |
| | |
| | PROVIDE A COMPLETE COPY OF THE FLORIDA STATE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL DOOR COVER SHEET. THIS WILL INCLUDE THE LINKS |
| | TO THE EVALUATION REPORT, INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. |
| | |
| | PROVIDE TWO COMPLETE, COLLATED SETS OF PLANS FOR PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE. OLD SHEETS (OR SHEETS NOT APPLICABLE) SHOULD |
| | BE MARKED VOID. |
| | |
| | AN ATTEMPT TO ASSEMBLE TWO COMPLETE PACKAGES WAS MADE, |
| | BUT IT IS NOT POSSIBLE AS SCOPE IS NOT CLEAR (NEW |
| | INCOMPLETE PRODUCT APPROVALS PROVIDED). |
| | |
