Plan Review Stops For Permit 15030968 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-12-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-12-28 |
Time |
11:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-12-28 |
Time |
11:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-12-28 11:32:50 | INCREASED VALUE TO $15,000.00 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-10-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-10-28 |
Time |
07:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-10-28 |
Time |
07:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-10-28 07:12:34 | 3RD REVIEW: FBC 2010 | | | | THE SUBMITTAL IS THROUGHLY CONFUSING. THE APPLICATION | | DESCRIPTION AND NEWEST PLAN DO NOT MATCH, THE SUBMITTAL | | CONSIST OF PLANS FROM MORE THAN ONE DESIGN | | PROFESSIONAL. ONE HAS A SITE PLAN, THE NEW ONE DOES | | NOT. THERE IS ENGINEERING FROM A THIRD DESIGN | | PROFESSIONAL SUPPLIED FOR WINDOW AND DOOR DESIGN | | PRESSURES YET THE BUILDING SHOWING THE AREA OF | | INSTALLATION IS SIGNED AND SEAL BY SOMEONE ELSE. A | | SHUTTER INSTALLATION SCHEDULE HAS BEEN PROVIDE BUT LIST | | THE DOOR AND WINDOW PRODUCT ON IT. WHY IS THAT | | SUPPLIED. ARE WINDOWS ON THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE PROPOSED | | TO BE REPLACED? ALTHOUGH THE NEW PLAN FOR THE ACCESSORY | | BUILDING IS LABLED "STORAGE" IT PRESENTS AS LIVING AREA | | AND ACCORDINGLY IS A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY AND THE | | PREVIOUS COMMENTS AS FOLLOWS STILL APPLY. | | | | THE VALUATION FOR THE PROPOSED WORK IS LOW AND THE | | SCOPE OF WORK IS UNCLEAR. PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE | | CLAIMED VALUE OR REVISE VALUE AND PROVIDE A FULL SCOPE | | OF WORK. | | FBC 109.3 BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION. FOR PERMITTING | | PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE | | TOTAL REPLACEMENT VALUE TO INCLUDE STRUCTURAL, | | ELECTRIC, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, INTERIOR FINISH, | | RELATIVE SITE WORK, ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN FEES, | | MARKETING COSTS, OVERHEAD AND PROFIT; EXCLUDING ONLY | | LAND VALUE. VALUATION REFERENCES MAY INCLUDE THE LATEST | | PUBLISHED DATA OF NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYSIS | | SERVICES (MARSHALL-SWIFT, MEANS, ETC.), AS PUBLISHED BY | | INTERNATIONAL CODE CONGRESS. FINAL BUILDING PERMIT | | VALUATION SHALL BE SET BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | | FBC 107 - PROVIDE A SURVEY WITH FLOOD DESIGNATION. | | | | FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THOSE | | PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BYFAC RULE 9N-3 REVIEWED | | AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. | | SPECIFICALLY, PROVIDE WINDOW, WINDOW MULLION, AND DOOR | | SUBMITTALS. PROVIDE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE APPLICABLE | | OPENINGS. | | | | THE FOLLOWING APPLIES TO THE GARAGE CONVERSION TO | | LIVING SPACE: | | | | PER TABLE 101.4.1 NONEXEMPT EXISTING BUILDINGS, NOT | | PREVIOUSLY CONDITIONED PERMITTED BEFORE MARCH 1979 AND | | OCCUPANCY TYPE CHANGE MINIMUM EFFICIENCY LEVELS SHALL | | BE MET FOR COMPONENTS BEING CHANGED ENVELOPE: SECTION | | 402, WQUIPMENT: SECTION 403, LIGHTING: SECTION 404. | | FBC 107.3.5.1.6 ENERGY CALCULATIONS - PROVIDE AN ENERGY | | SUBMITTAL COMPLIANT WITH FBC-E 103 | | | | FBCR TABLE R302.1 EXTERIOR WALLS; MINIMUM | | FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING WITHIN 3 FEET OF PROPERTY LINE | | IS: 1 HOUR-TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 119 OR UL | | 263 WITH EXPOSURE FROM BOTH SIDES. PROVIDE DETAILS TO | | DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FORGOING. FOR THE REAR | | AND WEST WALLS. | | | | FBC 107. PROVIDE FRAMING DETAILS FOR THE INSTALLATION | | OF THE NEW WINDOW AND NEW DOOR. | | | | A NEW WALL SECTION IS PROVIDED, BUT THE PREVIOUS | | COMMENT STILL APPLIES AS FOLLOWS: | | A TYPICAL BEARING WALL DETAIL IS PROVIDED. PLEASE | | CLARIFY WHY THE DETAIL IS PROVIDED AND WHAT WORK | | DEPICTED THERE IS PROPOSED AS NEW. | | | | A COMPLETE REVIEW CANNOT BE COMPLETED DUE TO THE LACK | | OF CLARITY OF THE SUBMITTAL. | | | | 107.2.1 INFORMATION ON CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. | | CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE DIMENSIONED AND DRAWN | | UPON SUITABLE MATERIAL. ELECTRONIC MEDIA DOCUMENTS | | SHALL BE SUBMITTED WHEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING | | OFFICIAL. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT | | CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF | | THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT WILL | | CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND RELEVANT | | LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS DETERMINED | | BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. SUCH DRAWINGS AND | | SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN THE FORM | | OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, | | WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY WITH THE | | TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE SPECIFIC, | | AND THE TECHNICAL CODES SHALL NOT BE CITED AS A WHOLE | | OR IN PART, NOR SHALL THE TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS | | EQUIVALENT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC | | INFORMATION. | | | | PLEASE NOTE IF THESE COMMENTS ARE NOT ADDRES PROPERLY | | ON THE 4TH REVIEW, A PENALTY WILL BE CHARGED. | | | | | | STEVEN KENNEDY, CBO | | CHIEF PLANS EXAMINER | | (561) 805-6710 | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | STEVEN KENNEDY, CBO | | CHIEF PLANS EXAMINER | | (561) 805-6710 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-08-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-08-25 |
Time |
07:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-08-24 |
Time |
10:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-08-25 07:58:50 | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2010 | | | | THE VALUATION FOR THE PROPOSED WORK IS LOW AND THE | | SCOPE OF WORK IS UNCLEAR. PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION FOR THE | | CLAIMED VALUE OR REVISE VALUE AND PROVIDE A FULL SCOPE | | OF WORK. | | FBC 109.3 BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION. FOR PERMITTING | | PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE | | TOTAL REPLACEMENT VALUE TO INCLUDE STRUCTURAL, | | ELECTRIC, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, INTERIOR FINISH, | | RELATIVE SITE WORK, ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN FEES, | | MARKETING COSTS, OVERHEAD AND PROFIT; EXCLUDING ONLY | | LAND VALUE. VALUATION REFERENCES MAY INCLUDE THE LATEST | | PUBLISHED DATA OF NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYSIS | | SERVICES (MARSHALL-SWIFT, MEANS, ETC.), AS PUBLISHED BY | | INTERNATIONAL CODE CONGRESS. FINAL BUILDING PERMIT | | VALUATION SHALL BE SET BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | | FBC 107 - PROVIDE A SURVEY WITH FLOOD DESIGNATION. | | | | FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THOSE | | PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BYFAC RULE 9N-3 REVIEWED | | AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. | | SPECIFICALLY, PROVIDE WINDOW, WINDOW MULLION, AND DOOR | | SUBMITTALS. PROVIDE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE APPLICABLE | | OPENINGS. | | | | THE FOLLOWING APPLIES TO THE GARAGE CONVERSION TO | | LIVING SPACE: | | | | PER TABLE 101.4.1 NONEXEMPT EXISTING BUILDINGS, NOT | | PREVIOUSLY CONDITIONED PERMITTED BEFORE MARCH 1979 AND | | OCCUPANCY TYPE CHANGE MINIMUM EFFICIENCY LEVELS SHALL | | BE MET FOR COMPONENTS BEING CHANGED ENVELOPE: SECTION | | 402, WQUIPMENT: SECTION 403, LIGHTING: SECTION 404. | | FBC 107.3.5.1.6 ENERGY CALCULATIONS - PROVIDE AN ENERGY | | SUBMITTAL COMPLIANT WITH FBC-E 103 | | | | FBCR TABLE R302.1 EXTERIOR WALLS; MINIMUM | | FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING WITHIN 3 FEET OF PROPERTY LINE | | IS: 1 HOUR-TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 119 OR UL | | 263 WITH EXPOSURE FROM BOTH SIDES. PROVIDE DETAILS TO | | DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FORGOING. FOR THE REAR | | AND WEST WALLS. | | | | FBC 107. PROVIDE FRAMING DETAILS FOR THE INSTALLATION | | OF THE NEW WINDOW AND NEW DOOR. | | | | A TYPICAL BEARING WALL DETAIL IS PROVIDED. PLEASE | | CLARIFY WHY THE DETAIL IS PROVIDED AND WHAT WORK | | DEPICTED THERRE IS PROPOSED AS NEW. | | | | A COMPLETE REVIEW CANNOT BE COMPLETED DUE TO THE LACK | | OF CLARITY OF THE SUBMITTAL. | | | | 107.2.1 INFORMATION ON CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. | | CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE DIMENSIONED AND DRAWN | | UPON SUITABLE MATERIAL. ELECTRONIC MEDIA DOCUMENTS | | SHALL BE SUBMITTED WHEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING | | OFFICIAL. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT | | CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF | | THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT WILL | | CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND RELEVANT | | LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS DETERMINED | | BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. SUCH DRAWINGS AND | | SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN THE FORM | | OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, | | WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY WITH THE | | TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE SPECIFIC, | | AND THE TECHNICAL CODES SHALL NOT BE CITED AS A WHOLE | | OR IN PART, NOR SHALL THE TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS | | EQUIVALENT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC | | INFORMATION. | | | | | | STEVEN KENNEDY, CBO | | CHIEF PLANS EXAMINER | | (561) 805-6710 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-05-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-05-01 |
Time |
11:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-04-28 |
Time |
15:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-05-01 11:32:56 | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2010 | | | | THE REVIEW IS SUSPENDED AS THE SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS ARE | | PREPARED AND SIGNED AND SEAL BY FERNANDO R, GOMEZ-PINA | | DATED 12/18/14. MR. GOMEZ-PINA VOLUNTARILY RELINQUISHED | | HIS LICENSE NUMBER 14710 ON 12/15/14 ACCORDING TO THE | | DBPR PUBLIC RECORDS.. ACCORDINGLY, THE DOCUMENTS ARE | | NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH FLORDIA BUILDING CODE SECTION | | 107, CHAPTER 471, FLORIDA STATUTES, AND 61G15 FLORIDA | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. THE MATTER IS FORWARDED THE | | FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS. | | | | STEVEN KENNEDY, CBO | | CHIEF PLANS EXAMINER | | (561) 805-6710 | | [email protected] | | | | | 2015-04-29 06:51:38 | 4/28/15 NOTE: BUILDING TO BE USED AS AN OFFICE ONLY, NO | | SLEEPING OR LIVING SPACE. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-12-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-12-28 |
Time |
11:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-12-28 |
Time |
11:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-10-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-10-28 |
Time |
07:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-10-28 |
Time |
07:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-10-28 07:43:27 | 2ND REVIEW: FBC 2010 NEC 2008 | | | | THE PLAN INDICATES THE DESIGN IS TO COMPLY WITH THE | | 2014 NFPA 70 NEC, WHICH IS NOT THE ADOPTED CODE IN | | EFFECT. THE CODE IN EFFECT AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION | | IS THE NEC 2008, BUT YOU MAY CHOOSE THE FBC 5TH EDITION | | RESIDENTIAL IF YOU WISH. | | | | THE ELECTRICAL DESIGN IS UNCLEAR. IS A NEW SERVICE | | PROPOSED? A RISER DIAGRAM IS PROVIDED THAT APPEARS TO | | BE NEW WORK. THERE ARE ALSO MANY NOTES REFERING TO AREA | | NOT ON THE PLAN SUCH AS BATHROOMS AND KITCHENS. ARE YOU | | DOING WORK IN THE PRIMARY BUILDING. ADDITIONALLY, THE | | PANEL SCHEDULE IS TOO SMALL AND NOT LEGIBLE. PROVIDE A | | MORE CLEAR PLAN. | | | | 107.2.1 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT | | CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF | | THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT WILL | | CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE. AND RELEVANT | | LAWS, | | | | | | STEVEN KENNEDY, CBO | | CHIEF PLANS EXAMINER | | (561) 805-6710 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-08-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-08-25 |
Time |
08:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-08-25 |
Time |
08:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-08-25 08:12:15 | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2010 NEC 2008 | | | | NEC 210.52(A)(1)&(2) OUTLET SPACING, IT APPEARS SOME | | POINTS ALONG THE WALL EXCEED 6? FROM AN OUTLET | | | | NEC 210.12B - OUTLETS TO BE AFCI PROTECTED. | | | | NEC 406.11- PROVIDE TAMPER RESISTANT RECEPTACLES. | | | | FBC 1006.1 MEANS OF EGRESS ILLUMINATION. PROVIDE | | ILLUMINATION. | | | | SHOW HOW THE AREA IS FED, PANEL, SUB PANEL, MEANS OF | | DICCONNECT, WIRING METHOD????? | | | | STEVEN KENNEDY, CBO | | CHIEF PLANS EXAMINER | | (561) 805-6710 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-05-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-05-01 |
Time |
11:13 |
Rev Time |
|
Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-02-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2016-02-03 |
Time |
08:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2016-01-27 |
Time |
13:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2016-01-27 13:50:53 | RESUB ROUTED TO IMPACT FEES |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2016-01-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2016-01-07 |
Time |
17:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2015-12-02 |
Time |
12:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-12-02 12:53:33 | RESUB ROUTED TO SKENNEDY |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-10-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-10-28 |
Time |
16:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-10-14 |
Time |
14:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-10-14 14:45:50 | SKENNEDY'S DESK |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-08-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-08-25 |
Time |
08:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-05-06 |
Time |
10:49 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2015-05-07 11:43:11 | SENT TO SGRAHAM | 2015-05-07 10:49:29 | ROUTE TO S.KENNEDY'S DESK. |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-05-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-05-01 |
Time |
11:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-03-23 |
Time |
14:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-04-08 14:11:30 | R33 | | | | | 2015-03-23 14:41:13 | ROUTED TO MISC 1 |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2016-02-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2016-02-03 |
Time |
08:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2016-02-03 |
Time |
08:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-10-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-10-28 |
Time |
07:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-10-28 |
Time |
07:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-10-28 07:02:41 | 2ND REVIEW: FBC 2010 RESIDENTIAL | | | | PLANS REQUIRE REVIEW BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE. CALL | | 233-5025. UPON APPROVAL, YOU MAY CHECK OUT ONE PLAN AND | | TAKE TO THAT OFFICE FOR REVIEW. PLEASE RETURNED STAMPED | | WITH A COPY OF RECEIPT AS APPLICABLE. | | | | STEVEN KENNEDY, CBO | | CHIEF PLANS EXAMINER | | (561) 805-6710 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-08-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-08-25 |
Time |
07:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-08-25 |
Time |
07:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-08-25 08:00:47 | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2010 | | | | THE FOLLOWING APPLIES TO THE PLANNED CONVERSION OF THE | | GARAGE TO LIVING SPACE. | | | | PLANS REQUIRE REVIEW BY THE PBC IMPACT FEE OFFICE. CALL | | 233-5025. UPON APPROVAL, YOU MAY CHECK OUT ONE PLAN AND | | TAKE TO THAT OFFICE FOR REVIEW. PLEASE RETURNED STAMPED | | WITH A COPY OF RECEIPT AS APPLICABLE. | | | | STEVEN KENNEDY, CBO | | CHIEF PLANS EXAMINER | | (561) 805-6710 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-12-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-12-28 |
Time |
11:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-12-28 |
Time |
11:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-10-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-10-28 |
Time |
07:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-10-28 |
Time |
07:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-10-28 07:40:37 | 2ND REVIEW: FBC 2010 | | | | THESE ARE REPEAT COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIUOS REVIEW. | | | | THE FOLLOWING APPLIES TO THE PLANNED CONVERSION OF THE | | GARAGE TO LIVING SPACE. | | | | FBCE-103.2.1.1.1 BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE ALTERNATIVE. | | AN ACCURATELY COMPLETED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING FORM 402 | | SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL TO | | DEMONSTRATE CODE COMPLIANCE BY THIS METHOD. | | | | FBCE-103.2.1.1.2 SIMULATED PERFORMANCE ALTERNATIVE. | | AN ACCURATELY COMPLETED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING FORM 405 | | (GENERATED BY COMMISSION APPROVED SOFTWARE) SHALL BE | | SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL TO DEMONSTRATE CODE | | COMPLIANCE BY SECTION 405. | | | | FBC-EC 403.2.5 PROVIDE A SIZING CALCULATION | | | | FBC- 107.3.5.3 PROVIDE A MECHANICAL PLAN/SPECIFY | | EQUIPMENT PER FBC-R M16. IT APPEARS YOU PLAN TO PUT A | | MECHANICAL UNIT IN THE REAR WALL, BUT THE WALL IS | | REQUIRED TO BE FIRE RATED THEREFORE YOU MAY NOT CHOOSE | | THIS LOCATION FOR THE UNIT. | | | | STEVEN KENNEDY, CBO | | CHIEF PLANS EXAMINER | | (561) 805-6710 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-08-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-08-25 |
Time |
08:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-08-25 |
Time |
08:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-08-25 08:04:00 | 1ST REVIEW: FBC 2010 | | | | THE FOLLOWING APPLIES TO THE PLANNED CONVERSION OF THE | | GARAGE TO LIVING SPACE. | | | | FBCE-103.2.1.1.1 BUILDING THERMAL ENVELOPE ALTERNATIVE. | | AN ACCURATELY COMPLETED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING FORM 402 | | SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL TO | | DEMONSTRATE CODE COMPLIANCE BY THIS METHOD. | | | | FBCE-103.2.1.1.2 SIMULATED PERFORMANCE ALTERNATIVE. | | AN ACCURATELY COMPLETED RESIDENTIAL BUILDING FORM 405 | | (GENERATED BY COMMISSION APPROVED SOFTWARE) SHALL BE | | SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL TO DEMONSTRATE CODE | | COMPLIANCE BY SECTION 405. | | | | FBC-EC 403.2.5 PROVIDE A SIZING CALCULATION | | | | FBC- 107.3.5.3 ? PROVIDE A MECHANICAL PLAN TO SHOW | | SUPPLY DUCTS PER FBC-R M16. | | | | STEVEN KENNEDY, CBO | | CHIEF PLANS EXAMINER | | (561) 805-6710 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-05-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-05-01 |
Time |
11:13 |
Rev Time |
|
Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-10-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
sgraham |
Date |
2015-10-28 |
Time |
16:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
sgraham |
Date |
2016-01-04 |
Time |
08:29 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-10-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
|
Date |
2015-10-28 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
|
Date |
2015-10-28 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2015-10-28 12:08:29 | 10/28/15 SUBMIT NEW SURVEYS |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-05-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-08-25 |
Time |
08:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
sgraham |
Date |
2015-05-13 |
Time |
12:06 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2015-05-13 12:07:49 | 5/13/15 PROVISO: BUILDING CAN NOT BE USED AS A SLEEPING | | ROOM, ONLY AN OFFICE |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-04-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
sgraham |
Date |
2015-04-28 |
Time |
15:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
sgraham |
Date |
2015-04-28 |
Time |
15:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|