| Plan Review Stops For Permit 15030959 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-04-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-04-20 |
Time |
13:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-04-20 |
Time |
13:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-04-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-04-15 |
Time |
22:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-04-15 |
Time |
22:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-05-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-05-14 |
Time |
16:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-05-14 |
Time |
14:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-05-14 15:01:10 | 5/14/2015 | | | PROJECT: LAUNDRY | | | PERMIT#: 15030959 | | | CODE: 2008 EDITION OF THE NEC, 2010 EDITION OF THE FBC | | | ,2010 WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC, CHAPTER 1, | | | ADMINISTRATION, 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS. | | | 4TH ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | ACTION: APPROVED WITH EXCEPTION. THE PLANS HAVE BEEN | | | APPROVED PROVISIONALLY. FAILURE TO CORRECT THE LISTED | | | DEFICIENCIES PRIOR TO INSPECTION WILL RESULT IN FAILED | | | INSPECTION(S) AND THE ASSESSMENT OF RE-INSPECTION | | | FEE(S). | | | | | | 1) IDENDIFY THE SCALE. WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC | | | 107.2.1 THROUGH 107.2.5 | | | | | | 2)THE BRANCH CIRCUIT FEEDING THE UNIT EQUIPMENT SHALL | | | BE THE SAME BRANCH CIRCUIT AS THAT SERVING THE NORMAL | | | LIGHTING IN THE AREA AND CONNECTED AHEAD OF ANY LOCAL | | | SWITCHES. NEC 700.12(F) | | | | | | 3) VERIFY THE ALLOWABLE AMPACITY OF EACH CONDUCTOR | | | SHALL BE REDUCED AS SHOWN IN TABLE 310.15(B)(2)(A). SEE | | | ANNEX B | | | | | | 4) BOXES AND CONDUIT BODIES SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE | | | TO PROVIDE FREE SPACE FOR ALL ENCLOSED CONDUCTORS. IN | | | NO CASE SHALL THE VOLUME OF THE BOX, AS CALCULATED IN | | | 314.16(A), BE LESS THAN THE FILL CALCULATION AS | | | CALCULATED IN 314.16(B). THE MINIMUM VOLUME FOR CONDUIT | | | BODIES SHALL BE AS CALCULATED IN 314.16(C). NEC 314.16 | | | | | | 5) USE ANNEX C, THE CONDUIT AND TUBING FILL TABLES TO | | | DETERMINE THE MAXIMUM FILL CAPACITY FOR CONDUCTORS AND | | | FIXTURE WIRES OF THE SAME SIZE IN CONDUIT OR TUBING | | | USED. | | | | | | DAVID HAYES, ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER, PX3421, | | | 561-805-6717 OR [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-05-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-05-12 |
Time |
15:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-05-12 |
Time |
15:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-05-12 16:04:15 | REVISE YOUR PLANS IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEW | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1) "B PHASE 208V TO GROUND ON A 120/240 DELTA HI LEG | | | ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM. THERE SHOULD BE NO | | | SINGLE POLE 120V BREAKERS INSERTED INTO ANY "B" PHASE | | | SLOTS IN ANY 3 PHASE DELTA PANEL BOARDS. | | | | | | 2) ACCESS TO EXITS SHALL BE MARKED BY APPROVED, READILY | | | VISIBLE SIGNS IN ALL CASES WHERE THE EXIT OR WAY TO | | | REACH THE EXIT IS NOT READILY APPARENT TO THE | | | OCCUPANTS. NFPA 101 SECTION 7.10.1.5.1 | | | | | | 3) EMERGENCY ILLUMINATION SHALL INCLUDE ALL REQUIRED | | | MEANS OF EGRESS LIGHTING, ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGNS, AND | | | ALL OTHER LIGHTS SPECIFIED AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE | | | REQUIRED ILLUMINATION. EMERGENCY LIGHTING SYSTEMS SHALL | | | BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED SO THAT THE FAILURE OF ANY | | | INDIVIDUAL LIGHTING ELEMENT, SUCH AS THE BURNING OUT OF | | | A LAMP, CANNOT LEAVE IN TOTAL DARKNESS ANY SPACE THAT | | | REQUIRES EMERGENCY ILLUMINATION. NEC 700.16 | | | | | | 4) THE BRANCH CIRCUIT FEEDING THE UNIT EQUIPMENT SHALL | | | BE THE SAME BRANCH CIRCUIT AS THAT SERVING THE NORMAL | | | LIGHTING IN THE AREA AND CONNECTED AHEAD OF ANY LOCAL | | | SWITCHES. THE BRANCH CIRCUIT THAT FEEDS UNIT EQUIPMENT | | | SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AT THE DISTRIBUTION PANEL. | | | EMERGENCY LUMINAIRES THAT OBTAIN POWER FROM A UNIT | | | EQUIPMENT AND ARE NOT PART OF THE UNIT EQUIPMENT SHALL | | | BE WIRED TO THE UNIT EQUIPMENT AS REQUIRED BY 700.9 AND | | | BY ONE OF THE WIRING METHODS OF NEC CHAPTER 3. NEC | | | 700.12(F) | | | | | | 5) VERIFY CONDUIT AND BOX FILL AS WELL AS CONDUCTOR | | | DERATING. | | | | | | 6) CORRECT THE SCALE THE PLAN IS DESIGNED TO. | | | | | | 7) CORRECT THE SIZE OF THE ARCHITACT'S SEAL. | | | | | | DAVID HAYES, ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER, PX3421, | | | 561-805-6717 OR [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-05-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-05-07 |
Time |
16:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-05-07 |
Time |
16:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-05-07 16:55:01 | 4/6/2015 | | | PROJECT: LAUNDRY | | | PERMIT#: 15030959 | | | CODE: 2008 EDITION OF THE NEC, 2010 EDITION OF THE FBC | | | ,2010 WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC, CHAPTER 1, | | | ADMINISTRATION, 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS. | | | 2ND ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | REVISE YOUR PLANS IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEW | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1) NEW PANEL "C" INDICATES A 90 AMP TOTAL CONNECTED | | | LOAD AT THE PANEL SCHEDULE YET IS FED BY ONLY A 70AMP | | | OCPD IN THE MAIN PANEL. | | | | | | 2) WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC 107.3.2 | | | A) INDICATE ALL CIRCUITRY ON THE FLOOR PLAN. INDICATE | | | WHAT IS EXISTING TO REMAIN AND WHAT IS PROPOSED TO BE | | | NEW. | | | B) INDICATE THE REQUIRED MEANS OF DISCONNECT FOR ALL | | | FIXED IN PLACE APPLIANCES. NEC 422 | | | | | | 3) NEC 700.12, 700.16 | | | THE BRANCH CIRCUIT FEEDING THE UNIT EQUIPMENT SHALL BE | | | THE SAME BRANCH CIRCUIT AS THAT SERVING THE NORMAL | | | LIGHTING IN THE AREA AND CONNECTED AHEAD OF ANY LOCAL | | | SWITCHES. THE BRANCH CIRCUIT THAT FEEDS EMERGENCY AND | | | EXIT LIGHTING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AT | | | THE DISTRIBUTION PANEL. NEC 700.12 | | | EMERGENCY LIGHTING SHALL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED SO | | | THAT THE FAILURE OF ANY INDIVIDUAL LIGHTING ELEMENT, | | | SUCH AS THE BURNING OUT OF A LAMP, CANNOT LEAVE IN | | | TOTAL DARKNESS ANY SPACE THAT REQUIRES EMERGENCY | | | ILLUMINATION. INDICATE THE REQUIRED EMERGENCY AND EXIT | | | LIGHTING ON THE LIGHTING PLAN. NEC 700.16 | | | | | | 5) NEC110.26 | | | INDICATE THE REQUIRED CLEARANCES FOR ELECTRICAL | | | EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. SEE LINK: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEVELOPMENT/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/SITES/33/ | | | 2013/09/APPLICATION_RESUBMITTAL_FORM_04132010.PDF | | | | | | ADDITIONALLY, IT IS REQUIRED TO INSERT THE CORRECTED | | | PAGES INTO THE DENIED SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. VOID THE | | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND LEAVE FOR COMPARATIVE | | | REVIEW. | | | | | | DAVID HAYES, ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER, PX3421, | | | 561-805-6717 OR [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-04-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-04-06 |
Time |
10:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-04-06 |
Time |
10:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-04-06 12:03:03 | 4/6/2015 | | | PROJECT: LAUNDRY | | | PERMIT#: 15030959 | | | CODE: 2008 EDITION OF THE NEC, 2010 EDITION OF THE FBC | | | ,2010 WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC, CHAPTER 1, | | | ADMINISTRATION, 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS. | | | 1ST ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC 107.3.2 | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS REQUIRED. THE ELECTRICAL PLAN | | | SUBMITTED ON SHEET E-1 INDICATES ALL ELECTRICAL | | | CIRCUITRY IS EXISTING. HOWEVER, SHEET A-1 INDICATES THE | | | INSTALLATION OF 3 NEW DRYERS AND 17 NEW WASHERS, | | | A) PROVIDE A RISER DIAGRAM TO INDICATE THE ELECTRICAL | | | SERVICE ENTRANCE, ALL MAIN OCPD(S) AND PANELS. | | | B) PROVIDE PANEL SCHEDULES INCLUDING THE OCPD(S) AND | | | WIRE SIZES FOR ALL AFFECTED CIRCUITRY AND FEEDERS. | | | C) PROVIDE LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR THE PANELS AND FOR THE | | | ELECTRICAL SERVICE. | | | | | | 2) WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC 107.3.2 | | | A) ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATION IS REQUIRED. INDICATE ALL | | | CIRCUITRY ON THE FLOOR PLAN. INDICATE WHAT IS EXISTING | | | TO REMAIN AND WHAT IS PROPOSED TO BE NEW. | | | B) INDICATE THE REQUIRED MEANS OF DISCONNECT FOR ALL | | | FIXED IN PLACE APPLIANCES. NEC 422 | | | | | | 3) NEC 700.12, 700.16 | | | THE BRANCH CIRCUIT FEEDING THE UNIT EQUIPMENT SHALL BE | | | THE SAME BRANCH CIRCUIT AS THAT SERVING THE NORMAL | | | LIGHTING IN THE AREA AND CONNECTED AHEAD OF ANY LOCAL | | | SWITCHES. THE BRANCH CIRCUIT THAT FEEDS EMERGENCY AND | | | EXIT LIGHTING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AT | | | THE DISTRIBUTION PANEL. NEC 700.12 | | | EMERGENCY LIGHTING SHALL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED SO | | | THAT THE FAILURE OF ANY INDIVIDUAL LIGHTING ELEMENT, | | | SUCH AS THE BURNING OUT OF A LAMP, CANNOT LEAVE IN | | | TOTAL DARKNESS ANY SPACE THAT REQUIRES EMERGENCY | | | ILLUMINATION. INDICATE THE REQUIRED EMERGENCY AND EXIT | | | LIGHTING ON THE LIGHTING PLAN. NEC 700.16 | | | | | | 4)NEC 422.60 | | | PROVIDE EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER DOCUMENTATION FOR ALL | | | NEW EQUIPMENT INDICATING LISTING REQUIREMENTS AND | | | ELECTRICAL CHARACTERISTICS SUCH AS LOAD, VOLTAGE AND | | | FREQUENCY. NEC 422.60 | | | | | | 5) WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC 107.3.2 | | | IDENTIFY ROOM DESIGNATIONS ON THE FLOOR PLAN AND | | | INDICATE THE LOCATIONS FOR THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE | | | ENTRANCE METER/MAINS EQUIPMENT AND PANELS. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY | | | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. SEE LINK: | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEVELOPMENT/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/SITES/33/ | | | 2013/09/APPLICATION_RESUBMITTAL_FORM_04132010.PDF | | | | | | ADDITIONALLY, IT IS REQUIRED TO INSERT THE CORRECTED | | | PAGES INTO THE DENIED SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. VOID THE | | | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND LEAVE FOR COMPARATIVE | | | REVIEW. | | | | | | DAVID HAYES, ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER, PX3421, | | | 561-805-6717 OR [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-04-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-04-29 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-04-27 |
Time |
16:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-03-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-03-25 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
2015-03-25 |
Time |
15:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-05-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-05-12 |
Time |
12:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-05-12 |
Time |
12:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-05-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-05-06 |
Time |
14:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-05-06 |
Time |
13:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-05-06 14:18:58 | 1) SHT. PM2 - GAS RISER - THE DRYERS ARE SHOWN AS 96 | | | CFH EACH BUT IN THE GAS LOAD TABLE THEY ARE SHOWN AS 90 | | | MBH.CLARIFY. | | | 2) THE TOTAL CFH/MBH LOAD ON THE SYSTEM THAT I | | | CALCULATED IS 1,547 CFH.YOU HAVE CLCULATED 1469 MBH. | | | PLEASE RE-CHECK YOUR CALCULATIONS. | | | 3) THERE ARE 7 DIFFERENT CFH LOADS ON THE GAS RISER | | | DIAGRAM WHERE THERE ARE NO INCREASES IN THE NUMBER OF | | | APPLIANCES. CLARIFY. | | | 4) THE GAS SIZING TABLES YOU HAVE LISTED (A2-2, 2-4, | | | 5-1, 5-2, & 3-4) ARE NOT LISTED IN THE 2010 FBC-FUEL | | | GAS CODE. HOW CAN 5 DIFFERENT SIZING TABLES BE UTILIZED | | | FOR ONE TYPE OF PIPING MATERIAL AT A SET DEVELOPED | | | LENGTH? CLARIFY. THE SYSTEM SHALL BE SIZED PER THE | | | SIZING TABLES IN CHAPTER 4 OF THE 2010 FBC-FUEL GAS | | | CODE. | | | 5) THE PLAN SHOWS THE PIPING MATERIAL AS COPPER. COPPER | | | SHALL NOT BE USED IF THE GAS CONTAINS MORE THAN AN | | | AVERAGE OF 0..3 GRAINS OF HYDROGEN SULFIDE PER 100 | | | STANDARD CUBIC FEET OF GAS PER THE 2010 FGC | | | SEC.403.4.3, 403.5.2. SINCE THIS IS A SAFETY ISSUE | | | DOCUMENTATION FROM FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES WILL BE | | | REQUIRED STATING THE CONTENT OF HYDROGEN SULFIDE IN | | | THEIR LINES. | | | 6) EXPLAIN HOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIRED | | | COMBUSTION AIR WERE DONE. I DO NOT UNDERSTAND YOUR | | | CALCULATIONS. THE RESULTING VALUE IS 16.29 OF WHAT? | | | NOTHING IS IDENTIFIED. CLARIFY.THESE CALCULATIONS DO | | | NOT APPEAR TO COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 304 OF THE 2010 | | | FGC.SEE THE MANUF. SPECS FOR THE DRYER FOR THE MIN. | | | REQD. MAKE-UP AIR. | | | 7) THE PLANS STATE THAT THE VENTS SHALL BE A MIN. OF 28 | | | GAUGE.ARE THESE SINGLE WALL VENTS? IF SO, THE MINIMUM | | | THICKNESS SHALL GALVANIZED SHEET STEEL NOT LESS THAN | | | 0.0304 INCH THICK. INDICATE THE THICKNESS OF THE 28 | | | GAUGE VENT PIPE PER THE 2010 FGC SEC.503.7. | | | 8) INDICATE ON THE PLANS IF THE DRYERS WILL BE | | | INDIVIDUALLY VENTED THROUGH THE ROOF OR INTERCONNECTED | | | WITH OTHER DRYERS.THE MANUF. SPECS RECCOMMEND | | | INDIVIDUAL VENTING.IF THE FLUES ARE INTERCONNECTED, | | | THEN THE VENTING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE VENTING TABLES | | | IN CHAPT. 304 OF THE 2010 FGC. | | | | | | I SUGGEST THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL CONTACT ME TO SET UP | | | AN APPOINTMENT TO REVIEW MY PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | | TIM LARGE | | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | | 561-805-6692 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-04-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-04-03 |
Time |
06:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-04-03 |
Time |
06:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-05-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-05-14 |
Time |
16:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-05-13 |
Time |
09:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-05-14 09:02:28 | RE-SUBMITTAL SENT TO DAVID HAYES FOR REVIEW. JG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-05-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-05-07 |
Time |
16:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-04-16 |
Time |
17:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-04-16 17:40:05 | ****EXPEDITED**** | | | C38 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-04-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-04-15 |
Time |
22:15 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
skennedy |
Date |
2015-03-23 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-03-23 14:26:08 | INCOMING SENT TO C-03. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-04-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2015-04-27 |
Time |
15:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2015-04-27 |
Time |
15:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-04-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2015-04-25 |
Time |
10:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2015-04-25 |
Time |
09:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-04-25 10:05:59 | PLAN DENIED | | | THE INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS IN THE PACKAGE ARE FOR | | | A T- 50 X 2 EXPRESS STACK DRYER. PLAN SHOWS A | | | T- 900 DRYER. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE | | | DRYER BEING USED FOR THE JOB OR REVISE THE PLAN. | | | | | | PLAN REVIEW BY HAROLD MOSER | | | [email protected] | | | OFFICE 561-805-6732 | | | FAX 561-805-6676 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-04-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2015-04-04 |
Time |
07:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2015-04-04 |
Time |
07:12 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2015-04-04 07:38:59 | PLAN DENIED | | | 1) REFER TO SECTION 304.1 GENERAL PROVIDE | | | MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS | | | FOR THE CLOTHS DRYERS 2010 FBC (M) | | | 2) PROVIDE MECHANICAL PLAN SHOWING DRYER EXHAUST. PER | | | SECTION 107 FBC 2010 | | | | | | PLAN REVIEW BY HAROLD MOSER | | | [email protected] | | | OFFICE 561-805-6732 | | | FAX 561-805-6676 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-05-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-05-06 |
Time |
13:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-05-06 |
Time |
10:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-04-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-04-03 |
Time |
06:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-04-03 |
Time |
03:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-04-03 06:06:17 | 1) THE WASHERS AND DRYERS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FL. | | | ACCESSIBILITY CODE SECS. 611.3 FOR THE LOCATION OF | | | OPERABLE PARTS OF THE MACINES AND 611.4 FOR THE HEIGHT | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR MACHINE DOORS FOR THE TOP LOADING AND | | | FRONT LOADING MACHINES.SHOW ALL THE DIMENSIONS ON THE | | | PLANS. | | | 2) THE PLANS SHOW 3 NEW DRYERS. ACTUALLY ALL THE | | | EXISTING DRYERS HAVE BEEN REPLACED.INDICATE THIS ON THE | | | PLANS. IDENTIFY ALL DRYERS ON THE PLANS AND NOTE THAT | | | THEY ARE BEING REPLACED. WPB AMEND. TO 2010 FBC | | | SEC.107.2.1. | | | 3) SHT. A-2 ELEVATION B-B DOES NOT CORRELATE WITH A-1. | | | SHOW THE ALCOVE (NEW DRYER AREA) WALLS, ETC. | | | 4) NOTE ON THE PLAN IF THE EXISTING TOILET ROOM IS | | | UNDERGOING ANY ALTERATION. IF SO, IT SHALL COMPLY | | | W/2010 FL. ACCESSIBILITY CODE. | | | 5) THE PLAN SHOWS MOST OF THE DRAINAGE PIPING AND WATER | | | PIPING AS EXISTING. ACTUALLY, MOST OF THIS PIPING WAS | | | REMOVED WITHOUT PERMITS. THE PLANS SHALL CLARLY REFLECT | | | THE ENTIRE SCOPE OF WORK TO BE DONE AND EXACTLY WHAT IS | | | NEW PIPING TO BE INSTALLED.WPB AMEND. TO 2010 FBC | | | SEC.107.2.1. | | | 6) THE SANITARY RISER SHOWS 5" DRAINAGE PIPE. THIS IS | | | AN ODD SIZE PIPE. CLARIFY. | | | 7) THE WAY THE SANITARY RISER IS DESIGNED AND DRAWN IS | | | EXTREMELY CONFUSING AND IS NOT CODE COMPLIANT.SUBMIT A | | | SANITARY RISER THAT CLEARLY REFLECTS THE INSTALLATION. | | | SIZE ALL VENTS, STANDPIPES, AND ALL SECTIONS OF THE | | | HORIZONTAL DRAIN. INDICATE THE PITCH OF THE SANITARY | | | LINES. SOME SANITARY LINES ARE SHOWN AS 2 3/8". THIS IS | | | NOT A STANDARD SIZE.WPB AMEND. TO 2010 FBC SEC. | | | 107.3.5.1.3. | | | 8) CLEANOUTS ARE REQUIRED IN THE BASE OF ALL STACKS PER | | | FPC SEC.708.3.4 AND AT EACH CHANGE OF DIRECTION GREATER | | | THAN 45 DEGREES .FPC SEC.708.3.3. | | | 9) THE SANITARY RISER SHOWS A 5" LINE CONNECTING INTO | | | ANOTHER 5" LINE. CLARIFY. | | | 10) SIZE ALL SECTIONS OF THE WATER AND SANITARY RISERS | | | WHEN THEY ARE RESUBMITTED. | | | 11) THE HOT WATER LINE ON THE RISER CONNECTS TO | | | NOTHING. THE DROP IS NOT CONNECTED TO ANYTHING. | | | 12) SHOW ON THE PLANS HOW THE WATER AND DRAINAGE LINES | | | WILL BE SUPPORTED. SUPPORT SPACING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | TABLE 308.5 OF THE 2010 FPC. | | | 13) INDICATE THE TYPE OF PIPE MATERIAL FOR THE WATER | | | AND DRAINAGE LINES. WPB AMEND.TO 2010 FPC SEC.107.2.1. | | | 140 SUBMIT MANUF. SPECIFICATION SHEETS FOR THE WASHERS. | | | WASHERS SHALL COMPLY W/ ASSE 1007. | | | | | | GAS | | | 14) SIZE ALL THE NEW AND EXISTING GAS PIPING AND | | | VENTS.WPB AMEND. TO 2010 FBC SEC.107.2.1. | | | 15) INDICATE THE TOTAL DEVELOPED LENGTH OF THE GAS | | | PIPING FROM THE POINT OF DELIVERY TO THE MOST REMOTE | | | GAS OUTLET.INDICATE THE PSI OF THE GAS SYSTEM,THE TYPE | | | OF PIPE BEING INSTALLED, AND THE TOTAL LOAD OF THE | | | SYSTEM. | | | 16) INDICATE THE GAS SIZING TABLE THAT IS BEING USED TO | | | SIZE THE SYSTEM.INDICATE ON THE PLAN IF THE GAS IS LP | | | OR NATURAL GAS. | | | 17) INDICATE ON THE PLAN IF THE DRYERS ARE STACKED | | | DRYERS. IF SO, THE GAS RISER SHALL SHOW THE GAS | | | CONNECTIONS TO ALL DRYERS. | | | 18) SUBMIT MANUF. SPECIFICATION SHEETS FOR THE GAS | | | DRYERS. DRYERS SHALL BE LISTED AND LABELED PER THE 2010 | | | FGC SEC. 301.3. | | | 19) SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR COMBUSTION AIR FOR ALL GAS | | | APPLIANCES PER 2010 FGC SEC. 304.1. | | | 20) SUBMIT DETAILS FOR THE GAS VENTS. INDICATE TYPE OF | | | VENT, SIZE OF VENT, BTU LOAD ON THE VENT. | | | 22) THERE WERE A NUMBER OF EXISTING GAS VALVES THAT | | | WERE NOT CONNECTED TO AN APPLIANCE. ANY GAS VALVES NOT | | | CONNECTED TO AN APPLIANCE SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A | | | VALVE AND CAPPED.INDICATE THESE ON THE GAS RISER. | | | 230 THE GAS PIPING SHALL BE PROPERLY BONDED PER THE | | | 2010 FGC SEC.310.1. | | | A THOROUGH REVIEW COULD NOT BE DONE DUE TO THE LACK OF | | | INFORMATION ON THE DRAWINGS. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE | | | GENERATED UPON THE RE-REVIEW OF THE DOCUMENTS. | | | | | | PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW | | | TIM LARGE | | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | | 561-805-6692 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-03-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ajones |
Date |
2015-03-27 |
Time |
10:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ajones |
Date |
2015-03-27 |
Time |
10:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
