Plan Review Details - Permit 15020937
Plan Review Stops For Permit 15020937
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 9 Status P Date 2017-06-21 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-06-21 Time 08:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-06-21 Time 08:40 Sent To  
Notes
2017-06-21 09:16:05FBC 2014
 OCC CLASS 5TH ED E
 OCC LOAD 250
 PROP USE SCHOOL
 SPRINKLER SYS? Y
 SPRK REQ'D? Y
 BATHRMS 9
 FLOOD ZONE A5 7.00
 UNITS 1
 FLOORS 2
 BEDROOMS 0
 SQ FT LIVABLE 16033
 SQ FT FOOTPRINT 8736
 SQ FT ROOF 7260
 USC-404 TYPE 326 - NEW:SCHOOL OR UNIVERSITY
  
 DFE PER PLAN = 8.96' NGVD29
  
 BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION CERTIFICATE OR
 FORM BOARD SURVEY SHOWING PROPOSED ELEVATIONS IS
 REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONCRETE POUR
 FINISHED CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION CERTIFICATE IS REQUIRED
 PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION.
  
 PROPOSED STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN SFHA A5. THE FIRST
 FLOOR PROPOSED FFE IS 8.46
  
 ELEVATION CERTIFICATE / FORM BOARD SURVEY REQUIRED
 PRIOR TO CONCRETE POUR
 FINISHED CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION CERTIFICATE REQUIRED
 PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION
  
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 8 Status P Date 2017-06-13 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-06-13 Time 14:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-06-13 Time 14:14 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 7 Status P Date 2017-04-25 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-04-25 Time 10:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-04-25 Time 07:57 Sent To  
Notes
2017-04-25 10:20:56PROVISO:
  
 BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION CERTIFICATE OR
 FORM BOARD SURVEY SHOWING PROPOSED ELEVATIONS IS
 REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONCRETE POUR
  
 FINISHED CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION CERTIFICATE IS REQUIRED
 PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION.
  
 THIS PERMIT, REVIEWS AND FEES INCLUDE B, M, E, P. ALL
 OTHER ITEMS (FA, FS, FENCES AND GATES, SIGNAGE,
 LANDSCAPING, ETC.) REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMITS -
 APPLICATIONS, FEES, PLANS AND REVIEWS.
  
 SEPARATE SUB PERMITS ARE REQUIRED.
  
 A SEPARATE ROOF SUB PERMIT IS REQUIRED. SUBMIT PRODUCT
 APPROVALS, REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD. INDICATE
 ASSEMBLY PROPOSED. PROVIDE ENGINEERING IF APPLICABLE.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 6 Status F Date 2017-03-22 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-03-22 Time 17:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-03-22 Time 17:25 Sent To  
Notes
2017-03-22 17:45:23****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014)
 FBC B = FBC BUILDING
 FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING
 FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY
 FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION
  
 1. SEE PREVIOUS LIST. THIS PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED WITH
 PROVISO; SEND VIA EMAIL ELEVATOR LOCATION AND
 COMMITMENT TO SUBMIT A REVISION WHICH INCORPORATES THE
 ELEVATOR.
  
 2. AS1.1 DOES NOT INCLUDE A LEGEND FOR THE DASHED LINE
 GRAPHIC. IT APPEARS THAT THIS DENOTES AREA OF WORK, NOT
 PROPERTY LINE. THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO,
 THE PROPERTY LINES AND ASSUMED PROPERTY LINES WERE USED
 FOR REVIEW.
  
 3. PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT WAS NOT REVIEWED; THIS REQUIRES
 A SEPARATE PERMIT.
  
 4. INFORMATIONAL ONLY; SHEET A2.4 IS NOT INCLUDED ON
 THE INDEX. PLEASE UPDATE INDEX SHEET BUT DO NOT
 RESUBMIT THIS SHEET UNLESS IT IS REVISED AND
 RESUBMITTED AS A RESULT OF COMMENTS FROM ANOTHER TRADE.
  
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2017-02-14 Cont ID  
Sent By S.HILL Date 2017-02-14 Time 12:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-02-13 Time 11:26 Sent To  
Notes
2017-02-14 13:12:40****CORRECTIONS****
 REVISED 2/14 TO ADD CODE SECTION FBC A 206.4
 REVISED 2/27 TO ADD INFORMATION FROM EMAIL SENT 2/16/17
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014)
 FBC B = FBC BUILDING
 FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING
 FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY
 FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION
  
 3. FBC A 201.1.1, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO SECOND FLOOR IS
 NOT CLEAR. THE ROUTE SHOWN INCLUDES STAIRS IN THE
 EXISTING BUILDING. STAIRS ARE NOT A COMPONENT OF AN
 ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, SEE FBC 402.2.
  
 A RAMP IN THE EXISTING BUILDING IS SHOWN, BUT THE ROUTE
 IS NOT CLEAR. A1.01 AND OTHER SHEETS DO NOT CLEARLY
 SHOW HOW AN OCCUPANT ENTERS THE BUILDING FROM THE RAMP.
 THE RAMP DOES NOT APPEAR TO LEAD TO AN ENTRANCE TO THE
 BUILDING.
  
 THE WIDTH OF THE ROUTE (BASE OF STAIRS TO BUILDING) IS
 NOT CLEAR IF THE RAMP IN THE BACK OF THE BUILDING IS
 THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. THIS ROUTE APPEARS CUMBERSOME AND
 MORE DIFFICULT THAN THE ROUTE THROUGH THE FRONT;
 LONGER, GOES THROUGH AN EXIT STAIR, TWO DOORS, AND AN
 UNIDENTIFIED AREA. IF THIS IS PROPOSED AS THE
 ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, PLEASE GET THIS APPROVED VIA EMAIL
 PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL BY SENDING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
 VIA EMAIL.
  
 2ND REVIEW: PLEASE SEE FBC A LOCATION (PARTIAL TEXT):
  
 ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL COINCIDE WITH OR BE LOCATED IN
 THE SAME AREA AS GENERAL CIRCULATION PATHS.
  
 SEE ALSO ADVISORY 206.3:
  
 THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE MUST BE IN THE SAME AREA AS THE
 GENERAL CIRCULATION PATH .... ADDITIONALLY, ACCESSIBLE
 VERTICAL INTERIOR CIRCULATINO MUST BE IN THE SAME AREA
 AS STAIRS AND ESCALATORS, NOT ISOLATED IN THE BACK OF
 THE FACILITY.
  
 AS PER OUR TELEPHONE DISCUSSION, PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR
 THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. THE FIRST DESIGN INCLUDED A RAMP
 ADJACENT TO THE STAIRS, SO ALL OCCUPANTS ENTER FROM THE
 SAME AREA FACING THE DROP OFF LOCATION. THE NEW DESIGN
 HAS ALL OCCUPANTS ENTERING VIA THE SAME AREA, BUT THE
 ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE IS AT THE REAR AND HAS AN
 ADDITIONAL 65 FEET OF TRAVEL DISTANCE TO ARRIVE AT THE
 ELEVATOR. IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THIS IS AN EQUIVALENT
 FACILITATION.
  
 7. FBC 107, AS THIS PERMIT WAS READY FOR ISSUANCE,
 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION WHICH IS NO LONGER APPLICABLE
 IS IN THE PACKAGE (SUCH AS ENERGY CALCS). PLEASE TREAT
 THESE THE SAME AS PLANS; THE ONES WHICH SHOULD BE
 REMOVED SHOULD BE MARKED VOID AND RETAINED SEPARATELY,
 WITH THE VOIDED PLAN SHEETS. ASSEMBLE TWO SETS OF
 SUPPLEMENTARY DOCUMENTS FOR REVIEW.
  
 18. THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH THE FOLLOWING
 PROVISOS:
  
 BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION CERTIFICATE OR
 FORM BOARD SURVEY SHOWING PROPOSED ELEVATIONS IS
 REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONCRETE POUR
 FINISHED CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION CERTIFICATE IS REQUIRED
 PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION.
  
 NEW COMMENT 2/16:
  
 AFTER REVIEW OF THE ACTUAL CIRCULATION PATH (OF WHICH I
 WAS PREVIOUSLY NOT AWARE) AND DISCUSSION WITH THE
 BUILDING OFFICIAL, IT APPEARS THAT VERTICAL
 ACCESSIBILITY SERVING THIS BUILDING IS REQUIRED. THE
 PLAN PROPOSED THAT OCCUPANTS WHO CANNOT NAVIGATE THE
 STAIRS ARE TO EXIT THE NEW BUILDING AND ENTER THE
 ADJACENT BUILDING IN ORDER TO UTILIZE AN EXISTING
 ELEVATOR. IT APPEARS THAT THE NEW BUILDING REQUIRES AN
 ELEVATOR.
  
 SEE FBC 206.3: "WHERE CIRCULATION PATHS ARE INTERIOR,
 REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL ALSO BE INTERIOR."
  
 FOR INSTANCE, AN OCCUPANT IN THE NEW BUILDING WHO IS
 ABLE TO USE THE STAIRS CAN GO DIRECTLY TO THE SECOND
 FLOOR AFTER ENTERING VIA ADMINISTRATION. SOMEONE UNABLE
 TO USE THE STAIRS WILL BE REQUIRED TO EXIT THE BUILDING
 AND ENTER A DIFFERENT BUILDING IN ORDER TO ACCESS THE
 SECOND FLOOR OF THE NEW BUILDING.
  
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2016-12-03 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-12-03 Time 11:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-12-01 Time 06:58 Sent To  
Notes
2016-12-03 11:29:26****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014)
 FBC B = FBC BUILDING
 FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING
 FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY
 FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION
  
 1. LS1.0, LS1.1 STATE THIS IS A TWO STORY OFFICE
 BUILDING, BUT OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION IS PRIMARILY
 EDUCATIONAL, REVISE OR CLARIFY.
  
 2. LS1.0 EXISTING BUILDING #2 INFORMATION INCLUDES A
 HEADING ?NEW BUILDING?, REVISE OR CLARIFY.
  
 3. FBC A 201.1.1, ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO SECOND FLOOR IS
 NOT CLEAR. THE ROUTE SHOWN INCLUDES STAIRS IN THE
 EXISTING BUILDING. STAIRS ARE NOT A COMPONENT OF AN
 ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, SEE FBC 402.2.
  
 A RAMP IN THE EXISTING BUILDING IS SHOWN, BUT THE ROUTE
 IS NOT CLEAR. A1.01 AND OTHER SHEETS DO NOT CLEARLY
 SHOW HOW AN OCCUPANT ENTERS THE BUILDING FROM THE RAMP.
 THE RAMP DOES NOT APPEAR TO LEAD TO AN ENTRANCE TO THE
 BUILDING.
  
 THE WIDTH OF THE ROUTE (BASE OF STAIRS TO BUILDING) IS
 NOT CLEAR IF THE RAMP IN THE BACK OF THE BUILDING IS
 THE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. THIS ROUTE APPEARS CUMBERSOME AND
 MORE DIFFICULT THAN THE ROUTE THROUGH THE FRONT;
 LONGER, GOES THROUGH AN EXIT STAIR, TWO DOORS, AND AN
 UNIDENTIFIED AREA. IF THIS IS PROPOSED AS THE
 ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, PLEASE GET THIS APPROVED VIA EMAIL
 PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL BY SENDING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
 VIA EMAIL.
  
 4. A 1.6, THE TEXT IDENTIFYING THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
 IS NOT LEGIBLE, PLEASE RELOCATE, FBC 107.
  
 5. LS 1.2, THE AREA WHICH APPEARS TO BE A LIBRARY IS
 NOT IDENTIFIED, FBC 107.
  
 6. LS PAGES, GENERAL INFORMATION, APPEAR TO INCLUDE
 INFORMATION NOT RELEVANT TO THIS PROJECT. IT IS NOT
 CLEAR WHICH DO APPLY, SUCH AS SCIENCE LABS,
 WOODWORKING. REVISE TO CLARIFY WHICH USES ARE
 APPLICABLE, OR REMOVE THOSE NOT APPLICABLE.
  
 7. FBC 107, AS THIS PERMIT WAS READY FOR ISSUANCE,
 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION WHICH IS NO LONGER APPLICABLE
 IS IN THE PACKAGE (SUCH AS ENERGY CALCS). PLEASE TREAT
 THESE THE SAME AS PLANS; THE ONES WHICH SHOULD BE
 REMOVED SHOULD BE MARKED VOID AND RETAINED SEPARATELY,
 WITH THE VOIDED PLAN SHEETS. ASSEMBLE TWO SETS OF
 SUPPLEMENTARY DOCUMENTS FOR REVIEW.
  
 8. IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE STRUCTURAL CALCS PREVIOUSLY
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED ARE TO BE A PART OF THE PERMIT
 PACKAGE. THE BUILDING SIZE CHANGED, BUT NEW CALCS WERE
 NOT PROVIDED. IS IT THE INTENT THAT THE CALCS ALREADY
 PROVIDED BE UTILIZED AS THEY ARE MORE CONSERVATIVE, OR
 ARE THEY NOT TO BE INCLUDED IN THE PERMIT RECORD?
  
 9. THE STRUCTURAL CALCS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED USE 180MPH
 AS DESIGN CRITERIA, PAGE S1.2 STATES 181MPH. CALCS
 STATE RISK CATEGORY III, S1.2 IS CATEGORY II (SEE FBC
 TABLE 1604.5). CALCS USE EXPOSURE D, S1.2 STATES DESIGN
 CRITERIA IS EXPOSURE C (THIS APPEARS TO BE EXPOSURE D,
 FBC 1609.4.3).
  
 REVISE S1.2 TO RISK CATEGORY III, EXPOSURE D, OR SEND
 JUSTIFICATION FOR PROPOSED WIND DESIGN CRITERIA VIA
 EMAIL IN ORDER TO GET THIS ISSUE RESOLVED PRIOR TO
 RESUBMITTAL.
  
 10. 2 A3.4, NO HANDRAIL SHOWN ON THE STAIRS, FBC
 1009.15. PLEASE ADVISE WHERE THE DETAIL FOR THE STAIR
 RAIL CAN BE FOUND (OR ADD DETAIL).
  
 11. SEE PLUMBING COMMENTS REGARDING ACCESSIBILITY; ALL
 ARE APPLICABLE FOR BUILDING REVIEW.
  
 12. P5.1 CONFLICTS WITH A1.6 ROOF DRAIN SIZES, FBC
 1503.4. A1.6 APPEARS COMPLIANT BUT SIZING (3 IN) DOES
 NOT APPEAR ADEQUATE ON P5.1, PLEASE REVISE.
  
 13. SEE THRESHOLD REVIEW. THREE SETS OF PLANS ARE
 REQUIRED FOR RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROJECTS. THIS ITEM HAS
 NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHETHER APPLICANT
 AGREES WITH RESIDENT INSPECTOR REQUIREMENT. PLEASE
 ADVISE PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL OR ENSURE THAT THREE
 COMPLETE SETS OF PERMIT DOCUMENTS ARE PROVIDED AT TIME
 OF RESUBMITTAL.
  
 RESIDENT INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS (RESUMES, AGREEMENT) MAY
 BE SENT SEPARATELY FROM THE RESUBMITTAL VIA EMAIL. AS
 THIS REQUIRES A REVIEW BY PLAN REVIEW (VERIFICATION OF
 LICENSES, COMPLETENESS OF SUBMITTAL) AND THE CHIEF
 BUILDING INSPECTOR (APPROVAL OF PROPOSED INSPECTORS),
 APPLICANT IS ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT DOCUMENTS AS SOON AS
 THEY ARE AVAILABLE.
  
 14. IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT BY PALM BEACH COUNTY IS
 REQUIRED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE. THIS MAY BE DONE
 AFTER ALL PLAN REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PASSED. THE
 PLANS STAMPED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY AND THE RECEIPT
 SHOWING THAT FEES DUE HAVE BEEN PAID IS REQUIRED TO BE
 SUBMITTED.
  
 15. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR ALL COMPONENTS AND
 CLADDING. ANY PRODUCT APPROVALS NOT SUBMITTED PRIOR TO
 PERMIT ISSUANCE WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AS A
 REVISION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
  
 16. OPTIONAL, PROVIDE UPDATED VALUE OF PROJECT, FBC
 109.
  
 17. ADVISORY ONLY: THE PROPOSED FLOOD MAPS (CURRENTLY
 SCHEDULED TO TAKE EFFECT IN EARLY 2017), SHOW A THE BFE
 FOR THIS LOCATION OF 8.519 NGVD29 (CONVERTED FROM 7.0
 NAVD88). THEREFORE THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION (8.46
 NGVD29) IS LOWER THAN THE 100 YEAR FLOOD EVENT BASED ON
 THE MOST RECENT DATA. AS FIRMS (AKA FEMA FLOOD MAPS)
 ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST FOOT, IT IS POSSIBLE THAT
 THE ACTUAL BFE IS UP TO .4 FEET HIGHER. APPLICANT IS
 ENCOURAGED TO INVESTIGATE THIS ISSUE, FBC 1612. PLEASE
 FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME IF YOU WOULD LIKE ADDITIONAL
 INFORMATION.
  
 THE PROPOSED MAPS ARE AVAILABLE AT THE FEMA WEBSITE
 (MAP SERVICE CENTER) AND ON THE PALM BEACH COUNTY GIS.
 THE RELATED PROPOSED FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY (FIS) IS
 AVAILABLE ON THE FEMA WEBSITE.
  
 HTTP://MSC.FEMA.GOV/PORTAL/SEARCH#SEARCHRESULTSANCHOR
  
 SEARCH FOR THE ADDRESS,
 SELECT "SHOW ALL PRODUCTS FOR THIS AREA"
 SELECT "PRELIMINARY PRODUCTS"
 PRELIMINARY FIS REPORTS AND PRELIMINARY FIRM PANELS
  
 18. THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH THE FOLLOWING
 PROVISOS:
  
 BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION CERTIFICATE OR
 FORM BOARD SURVEY SHOWING PROPOSED ELEVATIONS IS
 REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONCRETE POUR
 FINISHED CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION CERTIFICATE IS REQUIRED
 PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION.
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2016-01-20 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-01-20 Time 16:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-01-19 Time 15:29 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-20 16:31:49**PROVISOS**
  
 1. SEPARATE PERMIT REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION OF THE
 EXISTING STRUCTURE. A PERMIT APPLICATION AND THE DEMO
 PERMIT APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST ARE REQUIRED:
  
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/DEVELOPMENT-SERVICES/CONSTRU
 CTION/PERMITS
  
 2. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES; WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER PERMIT
 ISSUANCE, PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF
 ORDINANCES, ARTICLE V, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES, SECTION
 78-123(A) AND SECTION 78-126(A). THIS INFORMATION MAY
 BE SENT VIA EMAIL TO [email protected].
  
 3. PROVIDE THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ELEVATION
 CERTIFICATE VIA EMAIL FOR REVIEW.
 A FORM BOARD SURVEY AND BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION
 ELEVATION CERTIFICATE IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONCRETE
 POUR.
 A FINISHED CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION CERTIFICATE IS
 REQUIRED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION.
  
 4. OCCUPANT LOAD IS REQUIRED FOR CO. SHEET LS1.0
 INCLUDES TWO DIFFERENT OCCUPANT COUNTS (352 AND 369),
 PLEASE CORRELATE OR EXPLAIN DISCREPANCY.
  
 5. SQUARE FOOT AREA IS REQUIRED FOR CO. LS1.0 STATES
 SQUARE FOOT AREA AS 23,576. LS1.1 AND 1.2 STATE AREA AS
 22,213. PLEASE CORRELATE OR EXPLAIN DISCREPANCY.
  
 6. USE OF THE SOLYX DECORATIVE WINDOW FILM ON EXTERIOR
 GLAZING SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE WINDOW MANUFACTURER.
  
 7. ENGINEER TO REVISE FILE SET DESIGN PRESSURE CHARTS
 LABELS PER EMAIL, SHEET S6.1 (NO FURTHER ACTION
 REQUIRED).
  
 8. SHEET S 7-3. FOR PROPOSED ALUMINUM TRELLIS/ CANOPY
 SYSTEM THE DELEGATE ENGINEER IS TO SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS
 FOR APPROVAL TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR REVIEW AND
 APPROVAL BEFORE SUBMISSION TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
 FL 61G-15-30.006 (3) THE DELEGATED ENGINEER SHALL
 FORWARD THE DELEGATED ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS TO THE
 ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR REVIEW.
  
 9. 107.3.4.2 DEFERRED SUBMITTALS. FOR THE PURPOSES OF
 THIS SECTION, DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ARE
 DEFINED AS THOSE PORTIONS OF THE DESIGN THAT ARE NOT
 SUBMITTED AT THE TIME OF THE APPLICATION AND THAT ARE
 TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITHIN A
 SPECIFIED PERIOD. DEFERRAL OF ANY SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL
 HAVE THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. THE
 REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE
 SHALL LIST THE DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ON THE CONSTRUCTION
 DOCUMENTS FOR REVIEW BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.
 DOCUMENTS FOR DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED TO THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN
 RESPONSIBLE CHARGE WHO SHALL REVIEW THEM AND FORWARD
 THEM TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITH A NOTATION
 INDICATING THAT THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE
 BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO
 THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL
 ITEMS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THE DEFERRED
 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING
 OFFICIAL.
 2010 FBC-B 1609.1.2 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS, 1609.6.4.41
 COMPONENTS & CLADDING. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
 AFFAIRS RULE 9N-3 NOV. 01/ 2010 (31) SUB-CATEGORY OF
 PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION SYSTEMS THAT WILL REQUIRE
 PRODUCT APPROVALS:
 (31)(A) EXTERIOR DOORS.
 (B) WINDOWS
 (C) PANEL WALLS: STOREFRONTS, CURTAIN WALLS, WALL
 LOUVERS, EFIS SYSTEMS,
 (D) ROOFING PRODUCTS AND ASSEMBLIES
 (F) SKYLIGHTS
 G) ROOF TOP CURBS/ PRE- MANUFACTURED A/C STANDS
  
 10. 2010 FBC 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE
 PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE DCA RULE 9N-03
 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE
 DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR
 JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE
 ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING
 ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, SHOP DRAWINGS ETC..
  
 11. CONSTRUCTION WORK OR OTHER WORK RESULTING IN NOISE,
 VIBRATIONS OR DUST TENDING TO DISTURB THE PEOPLE OR THE
 PROPERTY WITHIN THE VICINITY THEREOF SHALL NOT BEGIN
 UNTIL THE HOUR OF 7:00 A.M. AND SHALL CEASE AT THE HOUR
 OF 7:00 P.M., MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, AND SHALL BE
 LIMITED TO BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 8:00 A.M. AND 8:00
 P.M., SATURDAY AND SUNDAY. EXCEPTIONS SHALL BE
 REQUESTED IN ADVANCE, IN WRITING.
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-10-05 Cont ID  
Sent By JWitmer Date 2015-10-05 Time 16:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2015-10-05 Time 08:09 Sent To  
Notes
2015-10-05 16:03:59BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 W. P. B. PERMIT: 15020937
 ADD: 1901 S. FLAGLER DR.
 CONT: IBIS BUILDING CORP.
 TEL: (561)318-8408
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W
 * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION
 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013.
 2ND REVIEW
 DATE: MON. OCT. 05 / 2015
 ACTION: DENIED
  
 1) 2ND REQUEST. THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A RESIDENT
 INSPECTOR.
 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING
 CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 110.3.9 OTHER
 INSPECTIONS SERVICES. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY MAKE,
 OR CAUSE TO BE MADE BY OTHERS, THE INSPECTIONS REQUIRED
 BY SECTION 109. HE/SHE MAY ACCEPT REPORTS OF INSPECTORS
 OF RECOGNIZED INSPECTION SERVICES, PROVIDED THAT AFTER
 INVESTIGATION HE/SHE IS SATISFIED AS TO THEIR
 QUALIFICATIONS AND RELIABILITY. A CERTIFICATE CALLED
 FOR BY ANY PROVISION OF THE TECHNICAL CODES SHALL NOT
 BE BASED ON SUCH REPORTS UNLESS THE SAME ARE IN WRITING
 AND CERTIFIED BY A RESPONSIBLE OFFICER OF SUCH SERVICE.
 THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY REQUIRE THE OWNER TO EMPLOY
 AN INSPECTION SERVICE IN THE FOLLOWING INSTANCES:
  
 1. FOR BUILDINGS OR ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II
 CONSTRUCTION
 2. FOR ALL MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS
 3. WHERE THE CONCRETE DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE
 STRENGTH (F ?C) IN EXCESS OF 3000
 POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH
 4. FOR PILE DRIVING
 5. FOR BUILDINGS WITH AREA GREATER THAN 20,000 SQUARE
 FOOT
 6. FOR BUILDINGS MORE THAN 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT
 7. FOR BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN OR
 METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION
  
 1A) FOR THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PLEASE PROVIDE A RESUME'
 OF INSPECTION EXPERIENCE ON PREVIOUS PROJECT. THE
 RESUME' MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY ALL CERTIFICATES AS
 SPECIFIED HEREIN. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS DESIGNEE
 WILL REVIEW THE RESUME'. AFTER THE RESUME' IS REVIEWED,
 AN INTERVIEW WILL BE SCHEDULED. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES
 WILL AN INSPECTOR BE INTERVIEWED FOR WORK WITHOUT FIRST
 MEETING THE ABOVE CRITERIA.
 CONTACT KEN CONRAD
 TEL: 561-805-6666
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 1B) THE CONTRACTOR WILL PRODUCE A JOB SUMMARY OR
 HISTORY FOR THIS TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. THIS MAY BE
 SUBMITTED TO KEN CONRAD BY E-MAIL. KEN CONRAD:
 [email protected]
  
 1C) NOTE FOR PAPER PLANS 3 SETS OF DOCUMENTS ARE
 REQUIRED INCLUDING SOILS REPORTS, ENERGY CALCS AND
 PRODUCT APPROVALS. FOR DIGITAL PLANS, AFTER PERMIT
 ISSUANCE, THE PERMIT LIBRARIAN WILL E-MAIL YOU, THE
 APPROVED AND BATCH STAMPED PLANS SO YOU MAY PRINT YOUR
 PLANS, TWO SETS OF PLANS WILL NEED TO BE PRINTED IN
 COLOR, (1) FOR THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR, THE OTHER FOR
 THE MEP INSPECTORS.
  
 1D) PLEASE CALL THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH?S AUTOMATED
 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS LINE (561) 805-6700) FOR
 IN-PROGRESS INSPECTIONS FOR AUDITING OF JOBSITE
 INSPECTIONS.
  
 2)PROVISO: NOTICE: ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
  
 THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
 ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT THAT APPLIES TO ANY REMODEL OR
 NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT
 APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED AFTER 7/1/14, AND THE TOTAL
 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN
 $500,000. PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ORDINANCE NO.
 4504-14, AND CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF
 ORDINANCES, ARTICLE V, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES, SECTION
 78-123(A) AND SECTION 78-126(A), THE ART ASSESSMENT IS
 1% OF THE TOTAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COST.
  
 PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF ORDINANCES, ARTICLE
 V, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES, SECTION 78-122, RENOVATION AND
 NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ARE ASSESSED CUMULATIVELY, SO
 THE ART ASSESSMENT WILL BE APPLICABLE TO ALL FUTURE
 PROJECTS.
  
 3)2ND REQUEST. FLOOD ZONE CERTIFICATES
 FBC BUILDING SECTION 1612 AND CITY OF WPB CODE OF
 ORDINANCES SECTION 94-546. STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN AN
 "A5" FLOOD ZONE. A FLOOD ELEVATION CERTIFICATE WILL BE
 REQUIRED. PLEASE REVIEW CITY ORDINANCE FOR THE CITY
 REQUIREMENTS REQUIRE AN ADDITIONAL 6 INCHES OF
 ELEVATION MINIMUM.
  
 DURING THE PERMITTING OF THIS STRUCTURE THERE WILL BE
 REQUIRED (3) DIFFERENT FLOOD ZONE CERTIFICATES
 REQUIRED:
 (1) A FLOOD ZONE CERTIFICATE IS REQUIRED AS PART OF THE
 PLAN REVIEW DOCUMENTS WITH THE PROPOSED FINISH
 FLOOR HEIGHT.
 (2) ONCE THE FIRST FLOOR SLAB IS POURED THE 2ND
 ELEVATION CERTIFICATE IS REQUIRED
 (3) BEFORE THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
 OR A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION THE 3RD FLOOD ZONE
 CERTIFICATE IS REQUIRED WITH THE HEIGHT OF ALL EXTERIOR
 ATTENDANTS A/C PADS OR OTHER SLABS FOR
 GENERATORS.
 FEMA FORM OMB NO. 1660-0008 EXPIRES: JULY 31/2015.
 FEMA'S NEW ELEVATION CERTIFICATE (EC) WAS APPROVED FOR
 USE, EFFECTIVE AUGUST 1/ 2013, THROUGH JULY 31/ 2015.
 FORM. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE DIFFERENCES, THE
 NEW FORM, AND INSTRUCTIONS ARE AVAILABLE AT:
 HTTP://WWW.FEMA.GOV/BUSINESS/NFIP/ELVINST.SHTM
  
 4) 2ND REQUEST. MISSING SOILS REPORT, WILL REQUIRE 3
 ORIGINALS FOR PAPER PLANS. FBC-B 1803.5.2 QUESTIONABLE
 SOIL.
 WHERE THE CLASSIFICATION, STRENGTH OR COMPRESSIBILITY
 OF THE SOIL IS IN DOUBT OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING VALUE
 SUPERIOR TO THAT SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS CLAIMED, THE
 BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL BE PERMITTED TO REQUIRE THAT A
 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BE CONDUCTED.5) THE PERMIT
 APPLIED VALUE IS STATED AS $4,055,000 THE CALCULATED
 VALUE IS $4,131,694.00 IN VALUE. W P B ADMINISTRATIVE
 CODE 108.2 SCHEDULE OF PERMIT FEES. ON BUILDINGS,
 STRUCTURES, ELECTRICAL, GAS, MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING
 SYSTEMS OR ALTERATIONS REQUIRING A PERMIT, A FEE FOR
 EACH PERMIT SHALL BE PAID AS REQUIRED, IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH THE SCHEDULE ESTABLISHED BY THE APPLICABLE
 GOVERNING AUTHORITY.
  
  
 5) COMPLIED> ADJUSTED VALUE TO CALCULATED VALUE. THE
 PERMIT APPLIED VALUE IS STATED AS $4,055,000 THE
  
 6-7) COMPLIED
 8) SEMI-COMPLIED. RESPONSE INDICATED ROOM 1-0004. SHEET
 LS 1.1 ROOMS 1-104 (COMPLIED 1-190) ARE MISSING THE
 EXIT SIGNS TO BE LOCATED AT THE EXIT DOORWAY OF THE
 ROOM, FBC-B 1006.3.8.
  
 9-12) COMPLIED.
  
 13) SEMI-COMPLIED. SHEET A8.4 COMPLIES, THE ISSUE IS
 WITH SHEET A5.2 DETAIL 01 HAS HORIZONTAL MULLIONS, THE
 HORIZONTAL MULLIONS DOESN?T WORK WITH WATER CURTAINS.
 SHEET LS 1.2 SHOWS AN 2 STORY ATRIUM ON THE SECOND
 FLOOR BUT THERE IS NO ENCLOSURE AROUND THE ATRIUM NOR
 COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-B 404.6 ENCLOSURES OF ATRIUMS OR
 EXCEPTIONS.
  
 14) COMPLIED . VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY.
  
 15-223B) COMPLIED
 23C) SEMI-COMPLIED. ROOF PRESSURES ARE GOOD. THE VULT
 NEGATIVE PRESSURES ARE LOW IN WALL ZONES 4 AND 5
 NEGATIVE PRESSURES ARE TAKEN AT THE ROOF LEVEL. SINCE
 THE VULT ARE LOW ALL OF THE NEGATIVE VASD ARE LOW.
 SHEET S6.1 ELEVATIONS WITH ASSOCIATED PRESSURES WILL
 NEED TO BE WORKED TO REFLECT THE 180 VULT, EXPOSURE D
 AND MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF 28.33 FT. PLEASE SHOW PRESSURES
 IN VASD SINCE THE PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE LISTED IN VASD.
 FBC-B 1609.1.5 TESTING TO ALLOWABLE OR NOMINAL LOADS.
 23D-25) COMPLIED.
  
 26) PROVISO: SHEET S 7-3. FOR PROPOSED ALUMINUM
 TRELLIS/ CANOPY SYSTEM THE DELEGATE ENGINEER IS TO
 SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR APPROVAL TO THE ENGINEER OF
 RECORD FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BEFORE SUBMISSION TO THE
 BUILDING DEPARTMENT. FL 61G-15-30.006 (3) THE DELEGATED
 ENGINEER SHALL FORWARD THE DELEGATED ENGINEERING
 DOCUMENTS TO THE ENGINEER OF RECORD FOR REVIEW.
  
  
 27) PROVISO: 107.3.4.2 DEFERRED SUBMITTALS. FOR THE
 PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ARE
 DEFINED AS THOSE PORTIONS OF THE DESIGN THAT ARE NOT
 SUBMITTED AT THE TIME OF THE APPLICATION AND THAT ARE
 TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITHIN A
 SPECIFIED PERIOD. DEFERRAL OF ANY SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL
 HAVE THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. THE
 REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE
 SHALL LIST THE DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ON THE CONSTRUCTION
 DOCUMENTS FOR REVIEW BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.
 DOCUMENTS FOR DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED TO THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN
 RESPONSIBLE CHARGE WHO SHALL REVIEW THEM AND FORWARD
 THEM TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITH A NOTATION
 INDICATING THAT THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE
 BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND TO BE IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO
 THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING. THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL
 ITEMS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED UNTIL THE DEFERRED
 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE BUILDING
 OFFICIAL.
 2010 FBC-B 1609.1.2 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS, 1609.6.4.41
 COMPONENTS & CLADDING. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY
 AFFAIRS RULE 9N-3 NOV. 01/ 2010 (31) SUB-CATEGORY OF
 PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION SYSTEMS THAT WILL REQUIRE
 PRODUCT APPROVALS:
 (31)(A) EXTERIOR DOORS.
 (B) WINDOWS
 (C) PANEL WALLS: STOREFRONTS, CURTAIN WALLS, WALL
 LOUVERS, EFIS SYSTEMS,
 (D) ROOFING PRODUCTS AND ASSEMBLIES
 (F) SKYLIGHTS
 G) ROOF TOP CURBS/ PRE- MANUFACTURED A/C STANDS
 28) PROVISO: 2010 FBC 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT APPROVALS.
 THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE DCA RULE
 9N-03 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE
 DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR
 JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL.
 FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
 SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS,
 SHOP DRAWINGS ETC..
  
 29) IMPACT FEES. BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE
 ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY.
 THE ACTUAL PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT
 OFFICE, AND A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE
 PERMIT APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE
 INFORMATION.
  
 30) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE
 REVISION & REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES
 AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL
 REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE
 REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION
 PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO
 EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED
 COOPERATION.
 JAMES A. WITMER CBO
 SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 TEL: 561-805-6715
 FAX: 561-805-6676
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-03-26 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2015-03-26 Time 13:28 Rev Time  
Received By shill Date 2015-03-23 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2015-03-26 13:28:42 
 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 W. P. B. PERMIT: 15020937
 ADD: 1901 S. FLAGLER DR.
 CONT: IBIS BUILDING CORP.
 TEL: (561)318-8408
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W
 * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION
 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013.
  
 IMPORTANT NOTICE: EFFECTIVE MARCH 30, 2015
 ALL PERMIT APPLICATION PLAN REVIEWS WILL BE PERFORMED
 ELECTRONICALLY
 UPON APPLICATION AND FEE PAYMENT DESIGN DOCUMENTS
 SUBMISSION OPTIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
 1 UPLOAD VIA THE PROJECT DOX PORTAL WITH DIGITAL
 SIGNATURES OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS AS APPLICABLE; USE
 THE REQUIRED NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT
 2 INCLUDE ON A CD IF DESIGN PROFESSIONAL DIGITAL
 SIGNATURES ARE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED; USE THE REQUIRED
 NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT
 3 INCLUDE ON A CD WITH ONE SET OF TRADITIONAL PAPER
 DESIGN DOCUMENTS SIGNED AND SEALED AS REQUIRED; USE THE
 REQUIRED NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT
 4 ONE SET OF TRADITIONAL PAPER DESIGN DOCUMENTS SUBJECT
 TO ADMINISTRATIVE FEES TO DIGITIZE THE DOCUMENTS
 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL BE PROVIDED WHEN IT BECOMES
 AVAILABLE
  
 1ST REVIEW
 DATE: TUES. MARCH 24/ 2015
 ACTION: DENIED
  
 1)THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A RESIDENT INSPECTOR.
 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING
 CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 110.3.9 OTHER
 INSPECTIONS SERVICES. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY MAKE,
 OR CAUSE TO BE MADE BY OTHERS, THE INSPECTIONS REQUIRED
 BY SECTION 109. HE/SHE MAY ACCEPT REPORTS OF INSPECTORS
 OF RECOGNIZED INSPECTION SERVICES, PROVIDED THAT AFTER
 INVESTIGATION HE/SHE IS SATISFIED AS TO THEIR
 QUALIFICATIONS AND RELIABILITY. A CERTIFICATE CALLED
 FOR BY ANY PROVISION OF THE TECHNICAL CODES SHALL NOT
 BE BASED ON SUCH REPORTS UNLESS THE SAME ARE IN WRITING
 AND CERTIFIED BY A RESPONSIBLE OFFICER OF SUCH SERVICE.
 THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY REQUIRE THE OWNER TO EMPLOY
 AN INSPECTION SERVICE IN THE FOLLOWING INSTANCES:
  
 1. FOR BUILDINGS OR ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II
 CONSTRUCTION
 2. FOR ALL MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS
 3. WHERE THE CONCRETE DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE
 STRENGTH (F ?C) IN EXCESS OF 3000
 POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH
 4. FOR PILE DRIVING
 5. FOR BUILDINGS WITH AREA GREATER THAN 20,000 SQUARE
 FOOT
 6. FOR BUILDINGS MORE THAN 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT
 7. FOR BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN OR
 METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION
  
 1A) FOR THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PLEASE PROVIDE A RESUME'
 OF INSPECTION EXPERIENCE ON PREVIOUS PROJECT. THE
 RESUME' MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY ALL CERTIFICATES AS
 SPECIFIED HEREIN. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS DESIGNEE
 WILL REVIEW THE RESUME'. AFTER THE RESUME' IS REVIEWED,
 AN INTERVIEW WILL BE SCHEDULED. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES
 WILL AN INSPECTOR BE INTERVIEWED FOR WORK WITHOUT FIRST
 MEETING THE ABOVE CRITERIA.
 CONTACT KEN CONRAD
 TEL: 561-805-6666
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 1B) THE CONTRACTOR WILL PRODUCE A JOB SUMMARY OR
 HISTORY FOR THIS TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. THIS MAY BE
 SUBMITTED TO KEN CONRAD BY E-MAIL. KEN CONRAD:
 [email protected]
  
 1C) NOTE FOR PAPER PLANS 3 SETS OF DOCUMENTS ARE
 REQUIRED INCLUDING SOILS REPORTS, ENERGY CALCS AND
 PRODUCT APPROVALS. FOR DIGITAL PLANS, AFTER PERMIT
 ISSUANCE, THE PERMIT LIBRARIAN WILL E-MAIL YOU, THE
 APPROVED AND BATCH STAMPED PLANS SO YOU MAY PRINT YOUR
 PLANS, TWO SETS OF PLANS WILL NEED TO BE PRINTED IN
 COLOR, (1) FOR THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR, THE OTHER FOR
 THE MEP INSPECTORS.
  
 1D) PLEASE CALL THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH?S AUTOMATED
 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS LINE (561) 805-6700) FOR
 IN-PROGRESS INSPECTIONS FOR AUDITING OF JOBSITE
 INSPECTIONS.
  
 2) NOTICE: ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
  
 THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
 ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT THAT APPLIES TO ANY REMODEL OR
 NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT
 APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED AFTER 7/1/14, AND THE TOTAL
 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN
 $500,000. PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ORDINANCE NO.
 4504-14, AND CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF
 ORDINANCES, ARTICLE V, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES, SECTION
 78-123(A) AND SECTION 78-126(A), THE ART ASSESSMENT IS
 1% OF THE TOTAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COST.
  
 PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF ORDINANCES, ARTICLE
 V, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES, SECTION 78-122, RENOVATION AND
 NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ARE ASSESSED CUMULATIVELY, SO
 THE ART ASSESSMENT WILL BE APPLICABLE TO ALL FUTURE
 PROJECTS.
  
 3) FLOOD ZONE CERTIFICATES
 FBC BUILDING SECTION 1612 AND CITY OF WPB CODE OF
 ORDINANCES SECTION 94-546. STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN AN
 "A5" FLOOD ZONE. A FLOOD ELEVATION CERTIFICATE WILL BE
 REQUIRED. PLEASE REVIEW CITY ORDINANCE FOR THE CITY
 REQUIREMENTS REQUIRE AN ADDITIONAL 6 INCHES OF
 ELEVATION MINIMUM.
  
 DURING THE PERMITTING OF THIS STRUCTURE THERE WILL BE
 REQUIRED (3) DIFFERENT FLOOD ZONE CERTIFICATES
 REQUIRED:
 (1) A FLOOD ZONE CERTIFICATE IS REQUIRED AS PART OF THE
 PLAN REVIEW DOCUMENTS WITH THE PROPOSED FINISH
 FLOOR HEIGHT.
 (2) ONCE THE FIRST FLOOR SLAB IS POURED THE 2ND
 ELEVATION CERTIFICATE IS REQUIRED
 (3) BEFORE THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
 OR A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION THE 3RD FLOOD ZONE
 CERTIFICATE IS REQUIRED WITH THE HEIGHT OF ALL EXTERIOR
 ATTENDANTS A/C PADS OR OTHER SLABS FOR
 GENERATORS.
 FEMA FORM OMB NO. 1660-0008 EXPIRES: JULY 31/2015.
 FEMA'S NEW ELEVATION CERTIFICATE (EC) WAS APPROVED FOR
 USE, EFFECTIVE AUGUST 1/ 2013, THROUGH JULY 31/ 2015.
 FORM. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE DIFFERENCES, THE
 NEW FORM, AND INSTRUCTIONS ARE AVAILABLE AT:
 HTTP://WWW.FEMA.GOV/BUSINESS/NFIP/ELVINST.SHTM
  
 4) MISSING SOILS REPORT, WILL REQUIRE 3 ORIGINALS FOR
 PAPER PLANS. FBC-B 1803.5.2 QUESTIONABLE SOIL.
 WHERE THE CLASSIFICATION, STRENGTH OR COMPRESSIBILITY
 OF THE SOIL IS IN DOUBT OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING VALUE
 SUPERIOR TO THAT SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS CLAIMED, THE
 BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL BE PERMITTED TO REQUIRE THAT A
 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BE CONDUCTED.5) THE PERMIT
 APPLIED VALUE IS STATED AS $4,055,000 THE CALCULATED
 VALUE IS $4,131,694.00 IN VALUE. W P B ADMINISTRATIVE
 CODE 108.2 SCHEDULE OF PERMIT FEES. ON BUILDINGS,
 STRUCTURES, ELECTRICAL, GAS, MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING
 SYSTEMS OR ALTERATIONS REQUIRING A PERMIT, A FEE FOR
 EACH PERMIT SHALL BE PAID AS REQUIRED, IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH THE SCHEDULE ESTABLISHED BY THE APPLICABLE
 GOVERNING AUTHORITY.
  
  
 5) THE PERMIT APPLIED VALUE IS STATED AS $4,055,000 THE
 CALCULATED VALUE IS $4,131,694.00 IN VALUE.
 THE PERMIT APPLIED VALUE IS STATED AS $4,055,000 THE
 CALCULATED VALUE IS $4,131,694.00 IN VALUE. W P B
 ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 108.2 SCHEDULE OF PERMIT FEES. ON
 BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, ELECTRICAL, GAS, MECHANICAL AND
 PLUMBING SYSTEMS OR ALTERATIONS REQUIRING A PERMIT, A
 FEE FOR EACH PERMIT SHALL BE PAID AS REQUIRED, IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH THE SCHEDULE ESTABLISHED BY THE
 APPLICABLE GOVERNING AUTHORITY.
  
 108.3* BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION.
 IF, IN THE OPINION OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, THE
 CLAIMED VALUATION OF BUILDING, ALTERATION, STRUCTURE,
 ELECTRICAL, GAS, MECHANICAL, OR PLUMBING SYSTEMS
 APPEARS TO BE UNDER ESTIMATED ON THE APPLICATION, THE
 PERMIT SHALL BE DENIED. FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES,
 VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE TOTAL
 REPLACEMENT PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND
 SYSTEMS SHALL BE THE TOTAL REPLACEMENT VALUE TO INCLUDE
 STRUCTURAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, INTERIOR
 FINISHES, NORMAL SITE WORK (EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL FOR
 BUILDINGS), ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN FEES, MARKETING
 COST, OVERHEAD AND PROFIT; EXCLUDING ONLY LAND VALUE.
 VALUATION REFERENCES MAY INCLUDE THE LATEST PUBLISHED
 DATA OF NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYSIS SERVICES
 (MARSHALL-SWIFT, MEANS, ETC.) WITH REGIONAL ADJUSTMENTS
 FOR LOCATION AS PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL CODE
 CONGRESS.
  
 6) SHEETS LS1.1 & LS1.2 BOTH SHOW STUDENT ROOMS WITH A
 OCCUPANT LOAD OF 35 SQUARE FEET PER OCCUPANT, THIS MAY
 BE A STATE STANDARD, BUT THE 2010 FBC-B TABLE
 1004.1.1FOR EDUCATIONAL CLASSROOMS USES 20 SQUARE FEET
 PER OCCUPANT. NOTE A MATRIX MAY BE REQUIRED SHOWING THE
 REQUIRED CLASSROOM LOADS FOR EACH CODE. THE OCCUPANT
 LOAD WILL INCREASE WITH THIS NEW LOADING, DOORWAYS, &
 STAIRS WILL NOT BE ABLE TO CALCULATE REQUIRED EGRESS
 WIDTHS.
  
 7) SHEET LS1.1 & LS 1.2 THE TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD OF 352
 IS PROVIDED, THIS BUILDING NEEDS TO BE CLASSIFIED AS A
 RISK CATEGORY III BUILDING. SHEET S-5.1 SHOWS THE RISK
 CATEGORY AS A CATEGORY III BUT THE WIND DESIGN
 PARAMETER IS 170 VULT PLEASE REVIEW FIGURE 1609B IN THE
 2010 FBC-B THIS SHOULD BE A 180 VULT WIND ZONE, 2010
 FBC-B TABLE 1604.5 ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS WITH OCCUPANT
 LOADS GREATER THAN 250.
  
 8) SHEET LS 1.1 ROOMS 1-104 & 1-190 ARE MISSING THE
 EXIT SIGNS TO BE LOCATED AT THE EXIT DOORWAY OF THE
 ROOM, FBC-B 1006.3.8.
  
 9) SHEET LS 1.1 ROOM 1-104 THE WINDOWS NEXT TO THE
 SOUTHERN STAIRWELL ARE WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE STAIRWELL
 AND WILL NEED TO COMPLY WITH FBC-B 1022.6 AND THE 2007
 FBC-B CODE COMMENTARY FIGURE 1020.1.4(1).
 10) SHEET LS 1.1 THE NORTH STAIRWELL DOOR 1-004-2 SWING
 OUT PASSED ONE HALF OF THE REQUIRED EXIT (22 INCHES) IN
 THE TRAVEL TO REACH 180 DEGREES. 2010 FBC-B 1008.1.9.11
 DURING ITS SWING, ANY DOOR IN A MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL
 LEAVE UNOBSTRUCTED AT LEAST ONE HALF OF THE REQUIRED
 WIDTH OF AN AISLE, CORRIDOR, PASSAGEWAY, OR LANDING,
 NOR PROJECT MORE THAN 7 INCHES (178 MM) INTO THE
 REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, CORRIDOR, PASSAGEWAY OR
 LANDING, WHEN FULLY OPEN.
  
 11) SHEET LS 1.1 ROOMS 1-111A STORAGE, 111-2 STORAGE,
 1-180 CUSTODIAL & 1-190 MECH/ ELEC. ROOM WILL NEED TO
 COMPLY WITH 508.2.5.2 THIS SAME CONDITION WILL OCCUR ON
 THE SAME TYPE ROOMS OF THE 2ND FLOOR.
  
 FBC-B 508.2.5.2 NONFIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED SEPARATION AND
 PROTECTION. WHERE TABLE 508.2.5 PERMITS AN AUTOMATIC
 FIRE-EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM WITHOUT A FIRE BARRIER, THE
 INCIDENTAL ACCESSORY OCCUPANCIES SHALL BE SEPARATED
 FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING BY CONSTRUCTION
 CAPABLE OF RESISTING THE PASSAGE OF SMOKE. THE WALLS
 SHALL EXTEND FROM THE TOP OF THE FOUNDATION OR FLOOR
 ASSEMBLY BELOW TO THE UNDERSIDE OF THE CEILING THAT IS
 A COMPONENT OF A FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED FLOOR ASSEMBLY
 OR ROOF ASSEMBLY ABOVE OR TO THE UNDERSIDE OF THE FLOOR
 OR ROOF SHEATHING, DECK OR SLAB ABOVE. DOORS SHALL BE
 SELF- OR AUTOMATIC-CLOSING UPON DETECTION OF SMOKE IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 715.4.8.3. DOORS SHALL NOT HAVE
 AIR TRANSFER OPENINGS AND SHALL NOT BE UNDERCUT IN
 EXCESS OF THE CLEARANCE PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 NFPA 80. WALLS SURROUNDING THE INCIDENTAL ACCESSORY
 OCCUPANCY SHALL NOT HAVE AIR TRANSFER OPENINGS UNLESS
 PROVIDED WITH SMOKE DAMPERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION
 711.7.
  
 12) SHEET LS 1.0 NOR LS 1.1 SHOW AN ASSUMED PROPERTY
 LINE BETWEEN THE NEW BUILDING AND THE EXISTING BUILDING
 TO THE WEST AND SOUTH OR IS THE DESIGNER OF RECORD
 GOING TO DECLARE COMPLIANCE WITH:
 503.1.2 BUILDINGS ON SAME LOT.
 TABLE 602 FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING REQUIREMENTS FOR
 EXTERIOR WALLS BASED ON FIRE SEPARATION
 DISTANCE
 TABLE 705.8
 MAXIMUM AREA OF EXTERIOR WALL OPENINGS BASED ON FIRE
 SEPARATION DISTANCE AND DEGREE OF OPENING PROTECTION
  
 12) THE OTHER ISSUE IS THE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS BETWEEN
 BUILDINGS PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-B 3104.5 FIRE
 BARRIERS BETWEEN PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS AND BUILDINGS OR
 ONE OF THE EXCEPTIONS IT APPEARS THIS WALKWAY IS NOT
 FIRE SPRINKLERED SEE SHEETS FS2.1 & FS2.2.
  
 13) SHEET LS 1.2 SHOWS AN 2 STORY ATRIUM ON THE SECOND
 FLOOR BUT THERE IS NO ENCLOSURE AROUND THE ATRIUM NOR
 COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-B 404.6 ENCLOSURES OF ATRIUMS OR
 EXCEPTIONS.
  
 14) THE PLANS LS1.1 NOR LS 1.2 FAIL TO SHOW COMPLIANCE
 WITH VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY. 201.1.1 VERTICAL
 ACCESSIBILITY. SECTIONS 553.501-553.513, F.S., AND THE
 ADA STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE DESIGN DO NOT RELIEVE THE
 OWNER OF ANY BUILDING, STRUCTURE OR FACILITY GOVERNED
 BY THOSE SECTIONS FROM THE DUTY TO PROVIDE VERTICAL
 ACCESSIBILITY TO ALL LEVELS ABOVE AND BELOW THE
 OCCUPIABLE GRADE LEVEL REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE
 STANDARDS REQUIRE AN ELEVATOR TO BE INSTALLED IN SUCH
 BUILDING, STRUCTURE OR FACILITY.
  
 15) SHEET A6.2 DOOR DETAIL SHEET NOR THE T1 SHEET THE
 INDEX SHEET SHOW A DOOR SCHEDULE NOR DOOR HARDWARE
 SCHEDULE FOR THE 1ST & 2ND FLOOR DOORS. 107.3.5.1
 MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA FOR COMMERCIAL
 BUILDINGS(7) DOORS AND HARDWARE. 2010 FBC-B TABLE 715.4
 & 1008.1.10 PANIC AND FIRE EXIT HARDWARE.
  
 16) THE LS1.1 LIST CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS 3 & 4 YEAR OLD
 IN SCHOOL. DOES THIS SCHOOL ALSO HAVE AFTER SCHOOL
 DAYCARE ? THIS WOULD THEN ALSO REQUIRE DOORS TO HAVE TO
 MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF 436.2, 436.3 & 436.4.
 17) OTHER ISSUES THAT DAYCARE WOULD HAVE TO INCORPORATE
 INTO THE PLANS ARE FBC-B 436.6.1
 THE FOLLOWING ROOMS OR SPACES SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM
 THE REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING BY FIRE BARRIERS HAVING A
 FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF NOT LESS THAN 1-HOUR OR SHALL
 BE PROTECTED BY AN APPROVED AUTOMATIC EXTINGUISHING
 SYSTEM.
 2. ROOMS OR SPACES USED FOR THE STORAGE OF COMBUSTIBLE
 SUPPLIES IN QUANTITIES DEEMED HAZARDOUS BY THE BUILDING
 OFFICIAL.
 3. ROOMS OR SPACES USED FOR THE STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS
 MATERIALS OR FLAMMABLE OR COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS IN
 QUANTITIES DEEMED HAZARDOUS BY RECOGNIZED STANDARDS.
 4. JANITOR CLOSETS.
 EXCEPTION: DOORS TO JANITOR CLOSETS SHALL BE PERMITTED
 TO HAVE VENTILATING LOUVERS WHERE THE SPACE IS
 PROTECTED BY AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERS.
 NOTE AS IN 508.2.5.2 WITH A SPRINKLERED BUILDING THEY
 WOULD STILL NEED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR RESISTING
 THE PASSAGE OF SMOKE.
  
 18) RESTROOM DETAIL SHEET A8.3 WILL NEED TO INDICATE
 CODE COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-B 1210.2 1210.2 WALLS AND
 PARTITIONS. WALLS AND PARTITIONS WITHIN 2 FEET (610 MM)
 OF URINALS AND WATER CLOSETS SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH, HARD,
 NONABSORBENT SURFACE, TO A HEIGHT OF 4 FEET (1219 MM)
 ABOVE THE FLOOR, AND EXCEPT FOR STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS,
 THE MATERIALS USED IN SUCH WALLS SHALL BE OF A TYPE
 THAT IS NOT ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY MOISTURE.
 2509.2 BASE FOR TILE. WATER-RESISTANT GYPSUM BACKING
 BOARD SHALL BE USED AS A BASE FOR TILE IN WATER CLOSET
 COMPARTMENT WALLS WHEN INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 GA-216 OR ASTM C 840 AND MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS.
 REGULAR GYPSUM WALLBOARD IS PERMITTED UNDER TILE OR
 WALL PANELS IN OTHER WALL AND CEILING AREAS WHEN
 INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GA-216 OR ASTM C 840.
  
 19) SHEET A10.2 THE OUTER HANDRAIL NOR SHEET A10.4
 DEPICT HOW THIS HANDRAIL IS TO BE MOUNTED, THE PLANS
 INDICATE A DETAIL 01/A10.5 SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-B
 1607.7.1.
  
 20) SHEET A10.4 PLEASE CHECK THE STAIR RISERS FROM THE
 MID LANDING TO THE UPPER LANDING FOR THE RISER HEIGHT,
 IT APPEARS TO BE GREATER THAN 7 INCHES IN HEIGHT. FBC-B
 1009.4.2.
  
 21) SHEETS WALL SECTIONS A5.1-5.8, THE NOTES FOR TYPE
 OF CEILING REFER TO CEILING SCHEDULE, THE PLANS ARE
 MISSING THE CEILING PLANS, THEY ARE ALSO MISSING IN THE
 T1 SHEET THE INDEX SHEET. 107.2.1.3 ADDITIONAL
 INFORMATION IS REQUIRED.
  
 22) SHEET A9.1 AND A9.2 SHOWS DROPPED CEILINGS WITH
 WHAT APPEARS TO BE CEILING TILE COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-B
 2603.5.2 THERMAL BARRIERS CANNOT BE DETERMINED.
  
 23) SHEET S-5.1 THE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA SHOW THE
 BUILDING BEING DESIGNED TO 170 VULT, EXPOSURE D AND A
 BUILDING RISK CATEGORY III.
 23A) BUILDINGS CLASSIFIED AS A RISK CATEGORY III
 (ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS W/ AN OCCUPANT LOAD. 250 TABLE
 1604.5) ARE TO BE DESIGNED TO A 180 VULT WIND ZONE SEE
 2010 FBC-B FIGURE 1609B.
  
 23B) SHEET S5.2 THE VULT AND VASD CHARTS ARE EXTREMELY
 LOW FOR 180 VULT, EXPOSURE D AND A MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF
 28 FT. 4 INCHES FOR EXAMPLE THE ZONE 3 @ 10 SQ. FT
 SHOULD BE AROUND 241.4 VULT.
  
 23C) SHEET S6.1 ELEVATIONS WITH ASSOCIATED PRESSURES
 WILL NEED TO BE WORKED TO REFLECT THE 180 VULT,
 EXPOSURE D AND MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF 28.33 FT. PLEASE
 SHOW PRESSURES IN VASD SINCE THE PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE
 LISTED IN VASD. FBC-B 1609.1.5 TESTING TO ALLOWABLE OR
 NOMINAL LOADS.
 23D) SHEET S5.2 THE PRESSURE CHART FOR THE ROOFING
 ZONES TAKES CREDIT FOR A 3?-0? PARAPET IN ROOF ZONE 3
 WITH THE SAME PRESSURES AS ROOF ZONE # 2. SHEET S3.1
 LIST THE ROOF DECK HEIGHT AT 128 FT. 4 INCHES PLUS ROOF
 TOP INSULATION, WHILE THE PARAPET HEIGHT IS GIVEN AT
 130FT. THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE FINISH ROOF HEIGHT
 AND PARAPET IS LESS THAN 2?-0?.
  
 23E) SHEET S-3.1 DOES NOT INDICATE WHAT TYPE OF
 MATERIAL IS GOING ON TOP OF THIS DECK? IF LIGHTWEIGHT
 CONCRETE, AND OR INSULATION? SHEET A4.1 INDICATES THE
 ROOF DECK TO BE R-30 TAPERED INSULATION OVER METAL
 DECK? THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS INDICATE FOR HORIZONTAL
 ROOF 5 IN. HEAVY WEIGHT CONCRETE AND 5 INCH GENERIC AS
 WELL AS R-19 GENERIC INSULATION. 107.2.1.3 ADDITIONAL
 INFORMATION IS REQUIRED.
  
 24) SHEET A2.2 DETAIL 07 ROOF TOP ACCESS HATCH WILL
 NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-B 1013.6.
  
 25) SHEET A2.1 INDICATES THE USE OF ROOF DRAINS AND
 SECONDARY ROOF DRAINS. THE PLANS DO NOT PROVIDE
 CALCULATIONS FOR RAINFALL/ HR NOR SIZE OF DRAINS OR
 STORM WATER.
  
 25A) FBC-B P] 1503.4 ROOF DRAINAGE. UNLESS ROOFS ARE
 SLOPED TO DRAIN OVER ROOF EDGES, DESIGN AND
 INSTALLATION OF ROOF DRAINAGE SYSTEMS SHALL COMPLY WITH
 SECTION 1503 AND THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, PLUMBING,
 CHAPTER 11.
  
 25B) FBC-B 1503.4.1 SECONDARY DRAINAGE REQUIRED.
 SECONDARY (EMERGENCY) ROOF DRAINS OR SCUPPERS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED WHERE THE ROOF PERIMETER CONSTRUCTION EXTENDS
 ABOVE THE ROOF IN SUCH A MANNER THAT WATER WILL BE
 ENTRAPPED IF THE PRIMARY DRAINS ALLOW BUILDUP FOR ANY
 REASON. THIS IS A COMPLETE SECONDARY SYSTEM.
  
 26) SHEET A5.9 CANOPY, THIS DETAIL IS CONCEPTUAL, THERE
 IS NO DESIGN CRITERIA FOR HIS ELEMENT. IS THIS CANOPY
 TO BE PERMIT UNDER THIS PERMIT? FBC-B 3102.3 TYPE OF
 CONSTRUCTION. NONCOMBUSTIBLE MEMBRANE STRUCTURES SHALL
 BE CLASSIFIED AS TYPE IIB CONSTRUCTION. NONCOMBUSTIBLE
 FRAME OR CABLE-SUPPORTED STRUCTURES COVERED BY AN
 APPROVED MEMBRANE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 3102.3.1
 SHALL BE CLASSIFIED AS TYPE IIB CONSTRUCTION. HEAVY
 TIMBER FRAME-SUPPORTED STRUCTURES COVERED BY AN
 APPROVED MEMBRANE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 3102.3.1
 SHALL BE CLASSIFIED AS TYPE IV CONSTRUCTION. OTHER
 MEMBRANE STRUCTURES SHALL BE CLASSIFIED AS TYPE V
 CONSTRUCTION.
  
 FBC-B3102.3.1 MEMBRANE AND INTERIOR LINER MATERIAL.
 MEMBRANES AND INTERIOR LINERS SHALL BE EITHER
 NONCOMBUSTIBLE AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 703.4 OR MEET
 THE FIRE PROPAGATION PERFORMANCE CRITERIA OF NFPA 701
 AND THE MANUFACTURER?S TEST PROTOCOL.
  
 27) THIS SUBMISSION NO PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE
 SUBMITTED. 2010 FBC-B 1609.1.2 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS,
 1609.6.4.41 COMPONENTS & CLADDING.
 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS RULE 9N-3 NOV.
 01/ 2010 (31) SUB-CATEGORY OF PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION
 SYSTEMS THAT WILL REQUIRE PRODUCT APPROVALS:
 (31)(A) EXTERIOR DOORS.
 (B) WINDOWS
 (C) PANEL WALLS: STOREFRONTS, CURTAIN WALLS, WALL
 LOUVERS, EFIS SYSTEMS,
 (D) ROOFING PRODUCTS AND ASSEMBLIES
 (E) SHUTTERS
 (F) SKYLIGHTS
 28) 2010 FBC 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE
 PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE DCA RULE 9N-03
 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE
 DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR
 JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL.
 FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
 SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS,
 SHOP DRAWINGS ETC..
  
 29) IMPACT FEES
 BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT
 FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL
 PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND
 A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT
 APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE
 INFORMATION.
  
 30) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE
 REVISION & REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES
 AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL
 REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE
 REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION
 PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO
 EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED
 COOPERATION.
  
 A THOROUGH REVIEW CANNOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A
 RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF
 THIS REVIEW.
  
 JAMES A. WITMER CBO
 SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 TEL: 561-805-6715
 FAX: 561-805-6676
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES HOME PAGE
 HTTP://WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/CONSTRUCTION/INDEX.PHP
  
  
  
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 6 Status P Date 2017-04-27 Cont ID  
Sent By rlecky Date 2017-04-27 Time 14:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rlecky Date 2017-04-25 Time 12:57 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2017-03-21 Cont ID  
Sent By rlecky Date 2017-03-21 Time 10:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rlecky Date 2017-03-21 Time 10:29 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2017-02-07 Cont ID  
Sent By rlecky Date 2017-02-07 Time 14:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rlecky Date 2017-02-07 Time 13:49 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2016-11-17 Cont ID  
Sent By rlecky Date 2016-11-17 Time 14:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rlecky Date 2016-11-17 Time 10:33 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2015-11-02 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2015-11-02 Time 14:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2015-11-02 Time 13:52 Sent To I
Notes
2015-11-02 14:27:43THESE PLANS WERE INITIALLY REVIEWED BY ROBERT LECKY AND
 ACCORDING TO THE SUBMITTED NARRATIVE ALL OF HIS NOTED
 COMMENT HAVE BEEN SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED.
2015-10-29 11:07:5310/29/15 IN RESPONSE TO AN EMAIL FROM ADAM HODES I
 ATTEMPTED TO CHECK THE RESUBMITTAL BUT WAS UNABLE TO
 FIND A NARRATIVE. I ADVICED ADAM TO PROVIDE ONE AND LET
 ME KNOW.
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-04-14 Cont ID  
Sent By rlecky Date 2015-04-14 Time 12:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rlecky Date 2015-04-14 Time 10:12 Sent To  
Notes
2015-04-14 12:47:3115020937
 1901 S. FLAGLER DRIVE
 NEW BUILDING FOR PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY
  
  
 PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS.
  
 SHEET E4.2
 ORANGE COLOR CODING OF CONDUCTORS IS RESERVED FOR HIGH
 LEG DELTASYSTEMS ONLY. NEC 110.15
  
 SHEET E4.2
 ON THE ELECTRICAL PLAN PROVIDE A SAFETY LABELING
 SCHEDULE FOR FLASH PROTECTION FOR THE SERVICE, PANEL
 BOARDS AND MAIN DISCONNECTING MEANS. NEC 110.22
  
 INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE UTILITY TRANSFORMER AND
 ELECTRICAL SERVICE CONDUCTORS ON THE ELECTRICAL SITE
 PLAN. NEC 215.5
  
 NOTE: SEPARATE PERMITS AND PLANS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALARM
 SYSTEMS, SECURITY, SITE LIGHTING AND DATA SYSTEMS.
  
  
 ROBERT LECKY, CBO
 ELECTRICAL PLANS REVIEW
 561-373-3701
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 6 Status P Date 2017-06-21 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-06-21 Time 09:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-06-21 Time 08:40 Sent To  
Notes
2017-06-21 09:20:09CONTACT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND COMPLY WITH ALL
 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS
  
 CIVIL PAGES ARE INCLUDED IN THIS SUBMITTAL FOR
 INFORMATION. NO ENGINEERING REVIEW OF THESE PAGES HAS
 BEEN DONE.
  
  
  
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2017-05-11 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-05-11 Time 06:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-05-11 Time 06:14 Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-11 06:15:28PER M.GONZALEZ, NEW SHEETS DO NOT NEED TO BE REVIEWED
 BY ENGINEERING AND THE "PASS" STATUS FOR ENGINEERING
 REVIEW IS STILL APPLICABLE
  
 ENGINEERING PERMIT FOR THIS SITE SUSPERSEDES THE
 BUILDING DEPARTMENT SUBMITTAL
  
  
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2017-02-23 Cont ID  
Sent By mgonzale Date 2017-02-23 Time   Rev Time 0.50
Received By mgonzale Date 2017-02-23 Time   Sent To I
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2017-01-11 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-01-11 Time 06:44 Rev Time 0.50
Received By mgonzale Date 2017-01-11 Time 06:44 Sent To  
Notes
2017-01-11 08:59:50ADDRESS PLANNING'S COMMENTS. THANK YOU!
2017-01-11 06:45:33APPLICANT TO CONTACT ENGINEERING AND APPLY FOR
 ENGINEERING PERMIT
  
  
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2015-09-21 Cont ID  
Sent By KCranfor Date 2015-09-21 Time 13:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 2015-09-18 Time 15:19 Sent To  
Notes
2015-09-21 13:40:081. LAND STABILIZATION AND EROSION CONTROL BONDS MUST BE
 POSTED PRIOR TO START OF DEMOLITION. CONTACT
 ENGINEERING DIVISION FOR REQUIRED BOND AMOUNTS.
  
 2. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SPECIFIED IN STORMWATER
 POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN MUST BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO
 START OF DEMOLITION. STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION
 PLAN MUST BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEERING DIVISION PRIOR
 TO IMPLEMENTATION.
  
 ALSO SEE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION E15050006
 FOR REVIEW OF SITE WORK (STORMWATER, POTABLE WATER, AND
 SANITARY).
  
 KELLY CRANFORD, P.E.
 LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 [email protected]
 561-494-1098 (OFFICE)
  
  
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-03-16 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 2015-03-16 Time 15:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 2015-03-16 Time 15:49 Sent To  
Notes
2015-03-16 15:51:58PUBLIC WORKS / ENGINEERING
  
 CIVIL DRAWINGS WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE SUBMITTAL.
  
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED.
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
 CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 KELLY CRANFORD, PE
 CITY LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1098 (OFFICE)
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 7 Status P Date 2017-04-18 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2017-04-18 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2017-04-17 Time 14:12 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 6 Status P Date 2017-03-22 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2017-03-22 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2017-03-22 Time 09:37 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2017-02-02 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2017-02-02 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2017-02-02 Time 11:24 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2016-11-21 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2016-11-21 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2016-11-18 Time 15:15 Sent To  
Notes
2016-11-21 15:48:06THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE
 MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
  
 1) SHEET LS 1.1 & OTHER A SHEETS - EXIT STAIR 1-003
 INDICATES AN EXITING DOOR ON THE GROUND LEVEL. THERE IS
 AN SLIDING GLASS DOOR ASSEMBLY LOCATED WITHIN 10FT THAT
 IS NOT INDICATED A FIRE RATED.
  
 PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 7
  
 7.2.2.5 ENCLOSURE AND PROTECTION OF STAIRS.
 7.2.2.5.1 ENCLOSURES.
 7.2.2.5.1.1 ALL INSIDE STAIRS SERVING AS AN EXIT OR
 EXIT COMPONENT SHALL BE ENCLOSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 7.1.3.2.
  
 7.2.2.5.2* EXPOSURES.
 7.2.2.5.2.1 WHERE NONRATED WALLS OR UNPROTECTED
 OPENINGS ENCLOSE THE EXTERIOR OF A STAIRWAY, OTHER THAN
 AN EXISTING STAIRWAY, AND THE WALLS OR OPENINGS ARE
 EXPOSED BY OTHER PARTS OF THE BUILDING AT AN ANGLE OF
 LESS THAN 180 DEGREES, THE BUILDING ENCLOSURE WALLS
 WITHIN 10 FT (3050 MM) HORIZONTALLY OF THE NONRATED
 WALL OR UNPROTECTED OPENING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AS
 REQUIRED FOR STAIRWAY ENCLOSURES, INCLUDING OPENING
 PROTECTIVES.
 7.2.2.5.2.2 CONSTRUCTION SHALL EXTEND VERTICALLY FROM
 THE FINISHED GROUND LEVEL TO A POINT 10 FT (3050 MM)
 ABOVE THE TOPMOST LANDING OF THE STAIRS OR TO THE
 ROOFLINE, WHICHEVER IS LOWER.
 7.2.2.5.2.3 THE FIRE RESISTANCE RATING OF THE
 SEPARATION EXTENDING 10 FT (3050 MM) FROM THE STAIRS
 SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO EXCEED 1 HOUR WHERE OPENINGS
 HAVE A MINIMUM ?-HOUR FIRE PROTECTION RATING.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE FOR THE REQUIRED RATING.
  
  
 2) SHEET LS 1.2 & OTHER A SHEETS - THERE ARE WINDOWS
 INDICATEDAS "J" WITHIN THE EXIT ENCLOSURES 1-003 &
 1-006. THOSE WINDOWS CAN NOT BE FOUND ON THE SCHEDULE
 AS HAVING ANY KIND OF FIRE RATING THAT IS EQUAL TO THE
 WALL RATING.
  
 PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 7
  
 7.2.2.5 ENCLOSURE AND PROTECTION OF STAIRS.
 7.2.2.5.1 ENCLOSURES.
 7.2.2.5.1.1 ALL INSIDE STAIRS SERVING AS AN EXIT OR
 EXIT COMPONENT SHALL BE ENCLOSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 7.1.3.2.
  
 7.1.3.2 EXITS.
 7.1.3.2.1 WHERE THIS CODE REQUIRES AN EXIT TO BE
 SEPARATED FROM OTHER PARTS OF THE BUILDING, THE
 SEPARATING CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 SECTION 8.2 AND THE FOLLOWING:
 (1)* THE SEPARATION SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 1-HOUR FIRE
 RESISTANCE RATING WHERE THE EXIT CONNECTS THREE OR
 FEWER STORIES.
  
 (9)* OPENINGS IN EXIT ENCLOSURES SHALL BE LIMITED TO
 DOOR ASSEMBLIES FROM NORMALLY OCCUPIED SPACES AND
 CORRIDORS AND DOOR ASSEMBLIES FOR EGRESS FROM THE
 ENCLOSURE, UNLESS ONE OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS
 EXISTS:
  
 (10) PENETRATIONS INTO, AND OPENINGS THROUGH, AN EXIT
 ENCLOSURE
 ASSEMBLY SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
  
 A WINDOW IS NOT LISTED UNDER ANY OF THE 9 ITEMS.
  
 THE WINDOW OPENING SHALL BE RATED OR REMOVED AS IT IS
 NOT ESSTENITIAL FOR THE FUNCTION OF THE STAIR.
  
  
  
 3) LS 1.1 - THE WALLS SURROUNDING THE STORAGE ROOM
 1-111 ARE NOT INDICATED AS BEING FIRE RATED EQUAL TO
 THE STAIR ENCLOSURE.
  
 7.2.2.5.3* USABLE SPACE. ENCLOSED, USABLE SPACES WITHIN
 EXIT ENCLOSURES SHALL BE PROHIBITED, INCLUDING UNDER
 STAIRS, UNLESS OTHERWISE PERMITTED BY 7.2.2.5.3.2.
 7.2.2.5.3.2 ENCLOSED, USABLE SPACE SHALL BE PERMITTED
 UNDER STAIRS, PROVIDED THAT BOTH ALL OF THE FOLLOWING
 CRITERIA ARE MET:
 (1) THE SPACE SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM THE STAIR
 ENCLOSURE BY THE SAME FIRE RESISTANCE AS THE EXIT
 ENCLOSURE.
 (2) ENTRANCE TO THE ENCLOSED, USABLE SPACE SHALL NOT BE
 FROM WITHIN THE STAIR ENCLOSURE. (SEE ALSO 7.1.3.2.3.)
 (3) THE SPACE IS NOT USED FOR THE STORAGE OF FLAMMABLE,
 OR OTHERWISE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL FOR THIS REQUIREMENT
  
  
  
 4) SHEET A 19.1 & A 14.1 - THE SHEETS WERE PLACED
 UPSIDE DOWN.
  
 PLEASE CORRECT TO PROPER PLACEMENT.
  
  
  
 5) SHEET A 14.1 - THE DOOR SCHEDULE APPEARS TO ONLY
 INDICATED DOORS ON THE 2ND LEVEL, THERE APPEARS TO BE
 NO DOOR SCHEDULE FOR THE 1ST FLOOR.
  
 PLEASE REVIEW AND ENSURE THE IS A DOOR SCHEDULE FOR THE
 1ST FLOOR AND ALL DOORS ARE ACCOUNTED FOR.
  
  
  
 6) SHEET A 14.1 - DOORS , BUT NOT LIMITED TO, 203, 008,
 200, 206A, 206(STAFF LOUNGE) 003, ALL APPEAR TO BE
 MISSING FROM THE SCHEDULE.
  
 PLEASE REVIEW ALL DOORS AND ENSURE THEY ARE CONTAINED
 WITHIN THE DOR SCHEDULE.
  
  
  
  
 7) LS 1.2 - THERE ARE MULTIPLE CANOPY'S THAT COVER THE
 EXIT EGRESS TO A PUBLIC WAY. THESE CANOPY'S ARE
 INDICATED WITH ANY FIRE PROTECTION RATING OR FIRE
 SPRINKLER PROTECTION.
  
 PER NFPA 101 EXIT DISCHARGE SHALL BE PROVIDED TO A
 PUBLIC WAY.
  
 3.3.83 EXIT DISCHARGE. THAT PORTION OF A MEANS OF
 EGRESS BETWEEN THE TERMINATION OF AN EXIT AND A PUBLIC
 WAY.
  
 7.1.9 IMPEDIMENTS TO EGRESS. ANY DEVICE OR ALARM
 INSTALLED TO RESTRICT THE IMPROPER USE OF A MEANS OF
 EGRESS SHALL BE DESIGNED AND INSTALLED SO THAT IT
 CANNOT, EVEN IN CASE OF FAILURE, IMPEDE OR PREVENT
 EMERGENCY USE OF SUCH MEANS OF EGRESS, UNLESS OTHERWISE
 PROVIDED IN 7.2.1.6 AND CHAPTERS 18, 19, 22, AND 23.
  
 7.1.10 MEANS OF EGRESS RELIABILITY.
 7.1.10.1* GENERAL. MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL BE
 CONTINUOUSLY MAINTAINED FREE OF ALL OBSTRUCTIONS OR
 IMPEDIMENTS TO FULL INSTANT USE IN THE CASE OF FIRE OR
 OTHER EMERGENCY.
  
 7.2.3.5 DISCHARGE.
 7.2.3.5.1 EVERY SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE SHALL DISCHARGE
 INTO A PUBLIC WAY, INTO A YARD OR COURT HAVING DIRECT
 ACCESS TO A PUBLIC WAY, OR INTO AN EXIT PASSAGEWAY.
 SUCH EXIT PASSAGEWAYS SHALL BE WITHOUT OPENINGS, OTHER
 THAN THE ENTRANCE TO THE SMOKEPROOF ENCLOSURE AND THE
 DOOR OPENING TO THE OUTSIDE YARD, COURT, OR PUBLIC WAY.
 THE EXIT PASSAGEWAY SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM THE
 REMAINDER OF THE BUILDING BY A 2-HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE
 RATING.
  
 PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED UNTIL A PERSON HAS ACCESS
 TO A PUBLIC WAY. THE CANOPY STRUCTURE CAN BE AFFECTED
 BY THE PRODUCTS OF COMBUSTION WHICH COULD LEAD TO
 FAILURE AND TRAP EXTING PERSONS.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE FOR THE REQUIRED PROTECTION LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY.
  
  
  
 8) SHEET S 6.1 - THERE APPEARS TO BE LIGHT WEIGHT TRUSS
 CONSTRUCTION OF BOTH THE FLOOR AND ROOF OF THE PROPOSED
 BUILDING.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE FOR THE APPLICABLE FLOOR & TRUSS SIGN
 REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTUE.
  
 PER FLORIDA 69A-60.0081; NOTICE SIGNAGE IS REQUIRED FOR
 STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION.
 ANY COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, OR ANY MULTIUNIT
 RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OF THREE UNITS OR MORE WHICH USES
 HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS-TYPE
 CONSTRUCTION IN ANY PORTION SHALL BE MARKED WITH A
 MALTESE CROSS SIGN MEASURING 8 INCHES HORIZONTALLY AND
 8 INCHES VERTICALLY, OF A BRIGHT RED REFLECTIVE COLOR.
 THE APPROVED SYMBOL SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN 24 INCHES TO
 THE LEFT OF THE MAIN ENTRY DOOR.
 1. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS ROOFS SHALL BE
 MARKED WITH THE LETTER "R".
 2. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS FLOOR SYSTEMS
 SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE LETTER "F".
 3. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS FLOOR AND ROOF
 SYSTEMS SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE LETTERS "R/F".
  
  
  
 9) SHEETS LS 1.1 & LS 1.2 - A KITCHEN IS INDICATED
 WITHIN THE NOTES OF THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN.
  
 PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 14, NEW EDUCATIONAL OCCUPANCIES
  
 14.3.2.2 COOKING FACILITIES SHALL BE PROTECTED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH 9.2.3. OPENINGS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED
 TO BE PROTECTED BETWEEN FOOD PREPARATION AREAS AND
 DINING AREAS.
  
 9.2.3 COMMERCIAL COOKING EQUIPMENT. COMMERCIAL COOKING
 EQUIPMENT SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 96, STANDARD
 FOR VENTILATION CONTROL AND FIRE PROTECTION OF
 COMMERCIAL COOKING OPERATIONS, UNLESS SUCH
 INSTALLATIONS ARE APPROVED EXISTING INSTALLATIONS,
 WHICH SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE CONTINUED IN SERVICE.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS AND THE LOCATION OF THE TYPE OF
 KITCHEN BEING PROPOSED.
  
  
  
 10) SHEETS LS 1.1 & 1.2 - SCIENCE LAB IS INDICATED
 WITHIN THE NOTES OF THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN.
  
 14.3.2.5 EDUCATIONAL OCCUPANCY LABORATORIES USING
 CHEMICALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 8.7.4.
  
 8.7.4 LABORATORIES.
 8.7.4.1 LABORATORIES THAT USE CHEMICALS SHALL COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 45, STANDARD ON FIRE PROTECTION FOR
 LABORATORIES USING CHEMICALS, UNLESS OTHERWISE MODIFIED
 BY OTHER PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS AND THE LOCATION OF THE SCIENCE
 LAB BEING PROPOSED.
  
  
  
 11) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET
 REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE
 ABOVE.
  
  
  
 12) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE
 RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE.
  
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
  
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2015-12-21 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2015-12-21 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2015-12-21 Time 15:11 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2015-09-07 Cont ID  
Sent By PLeduc Date 2015-09-07 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2015-09-04 Time 13:28 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-03-09 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2015-03-09 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2015-03-05 Time 14:44 Sent To  
Notes
2015-03-06 16:55:11THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE
 MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1) SHEET LS 1.1 DOOR 1-004; DOOR 1-191; SHEET LS 1.2
 DOOR1-209; EXIT DOOR LEAF ENCROACHMENT.
 NFPA 101 CHAPTER 7, MEANS OF EGRESS
 7.2.1.4.3 DOOR LEAF ENCROACHMENT
 7.2.1.4.3.1 DURING ITS SWING, ANY DOOR LEAF IN A MEANS
 OF EGRESS SHALL LEAVE NOT LESS THAN ONE-HALF OF THE
 REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, A CORRIDOR, A PASSAGEWAY,
 OR A
 LANDING UNOBSTRUCTED AND SHALL NOT PROJECT NOT MORE
 THAN 7 IN. INTO THE REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, A
 CORRIDOR, A PASSAGE WAY, OR A LANDING, WHEN FULLY OPEN,
 UNLESS BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET:
 (1) THE DOOR OPENING PROVIDES ACCESS TO A STAIR IN AN
 EXISTING BUILDING.
 (2) THE DOOR OPENING MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS THAT LIMITS
 PROJECTION TO NOT MORE THAN 7 IN. INTO THE REQUIRED
 WIDTH OF THE STAIR LANDING WHEN THE DOOR
 LEAF IS FULLY OPEN.
 2) SHEET LS 1.1 THE WALLS OF ROOMS 1-112, 1-190 AND
 1-290 ARE REQUIRED TO BE 1 HOUR FIRE RATED.
  
 3) SHEET LS1.1 & 1.2 STAIRWELL 1-003 ENCLOSURE AND
 PROTECTION OF STAIRS. THE UNPROTECTED WINDOW OPENINGS
 OF THIS STAIRWELL AND/OR ASSOCIATED EXTERIOR WALLS
 WITHIN 10 FT SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH AN 1 HOUR FIRE
 RATING.
 7.2.2.5.2 EXPOSURES.
 7.2.2.5.2.1 WHERE NONRATED WALLS OR UNPROTECTED
 OPENEINGS ENCLOSE THE EXTERIOR OF A STAIRWAY, OTHER
 THAN AN EXISTING STAIRWAY, AND THE WALLS OR OPENINGS
 ARE EXPOSED BY
 OTHER PARTS OF THE BUILDING AS AN ANGLE OF LESS THAN
 180 DEGREES, THE BUILDING ENCLOSURE WALLS WITHIN 10 FT
 HORIZONTALLY OF THE NONRATED WALL OR UNPROTECTED
 OPENING SHALL BE
 CONSTRUCTED AS REQUIRED FOR STAIRWAY ENCLUSRES,
 INCLUDING OPENING PROTECTIVES.
  
 4) A DOOR SCHEDULE INDICATING ALL DOOR FIRE RATINGS,
 HARDWARE, FINISH, AND/OR LOCKING DEVICES IS NOT
 ATTACHED TO THIS SUBMITTED PLAN OR IS NOT READILY
 IDENTIFIABLE. THE FIRE RATING OF DOORS CAN NOT BE
 REVIEWED, CONFIRMED OR APPROVED.
  
 5) THE CURVED STAIR SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 101 8.6 AND NFPA 13, 8.15 SPECIAL
 SITUATIONS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION UNDER THE STAIRS.
  
 6) SHEET FS 2.1 & 2.2 , FIRE SPRINKLER PROTECTION WAS
 NOT INDICATED IN THE COMMON HALLWAYS, WITHIN THE
 STAIRWELLS AND THE OPEN ATIURM. A COMPLETE FIRE
 SPRINKLER IS REQUIRED IN THIS OCCUPANCY.
  
 7) AN EXIT SIGN IS REQUIRED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE CURVED
 STAIR AT DOOR 1-005 LEADING TO THE EXIT CORRIDOR.
  
 8) SOME OF THE CURRENT FIRE CODE LISTINGS INDICATED
 WITHIN THE SUBMITTED PLAN ARE INCORRECT AND NEED TO BE
 UPDATED WHERE APPLICABLE. THE PROPOSED PROJECT SHALL
 MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 5TH EDITION OF FLORIDA
 FIRE PREVENTION CODE INCLUDING THE 2012 EDITION OF NFPA
 1 AND NFPA 101 AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE CODES OR
 STANDARDS.
 FIRE SPRINKLER WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS
 OF NFPA 13, 2010 EDITION.
 FIRE ALARM WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 NFPA 72, 2010 EDITION.
 CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 NFPA 241, 2009 EDITION.
 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS
 OF NFPA 10, 2010 EDITION.
 ELECTRIC WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 70, 2011 EDITION.
  
 9) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE APPLIED IN THE FUTURE
 BASED ON THE RESUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE.
  
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 7 Status N Date 2017-06-21 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-06-21 Time 09:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-06-19 Time 13:42 Sent To  
Notes
2017-06-20 13:42:31IMPACT FEES ROUTED TO SHILL
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 6 Status N Date 2017-06-13 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-06-13 Time 14:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-06-01 Time 08:31 Sent To  
Notes
2017-06-02 08:32:09C35 & C36
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2017-05-24 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-05-18 Time 10:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-01-31 Time 09:27 Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-24 10:23:035/24 CLOSED I STOP
 REVIEW CYCLE #5 WAS NOT CLOSED OUT; REVIEW CYCLE 6 DONE
 WITHOUT A NEW I STOP. THE RESULT WAS THAT THE SUBMITTAL
 DATE FOR REVIEW CYCLE #5 (1/31/2017) WAS USED FOR
 REVIEW CYCLE #6 TO ATTEMPT TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW.
  
  
2017-02-01 09:28:09C35 & 36
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2017-01-11 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-01-11 Time 06:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-11-14 Time 15:03 Sent To  
Notes
2016-11-15 15:04:24C35
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2016-01-25 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2016-01-25 Time 12:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 2015-12-18 Time 14:55 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-18 14:55:13C28
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2015-11-02 Cont ID  
Sent By albarran Date 2015-11-02 Time 14:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By albarran Date 2015-09-03 Time 16:45 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-02 14:43:3311/2/15 ALL PREVIOUSLY ADDRESSED COMMENTS HAVE BEEN
 SATISFACTORILY CORRECTED. PASSED ELECTRICAL REVIEW.
 CONTRACTOR NOTIFIED VIA EMAIL. PLANS ARE SO LARGE THAT
 I LEFT THEM IN BIN "C3". MA
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2015-04-21 Cont ID  
Sent By hmoser Date 2015-04-21 Time 10:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By hmoser Date 2015-02-27 Time 09:17 Sent To  
Notes
2015-02-28 09:17:44C27
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 7 Status P Date 2017-06-21 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-06-21 Time 09:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-06-21 Time 08:40 Sent To  
Notes
2017-06-21 09:28:30MU-2017-016677-0000
 $20,153.56
 PLANS STAMPED (FILE SET)
  
  
  
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 6 Status F Date 2017-06-13 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-06-13 Time 14:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-06-13 Time 14:45 Sent To  
Notes
2017-06-13 14:45:53****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT BY PALM BEACH COUNTY REQUIRED.
  
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2017-03-22 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-03-22 Time 18:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-03-22 Time 18:28 Sent To  
Notes
2017-03-22 18:28:32****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT BY PALM BEACH COUNTY REQUIRED.
  
 PLEASE SEE BUILDING PROVISO REGARDING SQUARE FOOT AREA
 DISCREPANCY. IF IMPACT FEES ARE NOT PAID ON THE LARGER
 AREA (23,576), AN EXPLANATION OF THE DISCREPANCY IS
 REQUIRED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE.
  
  
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2016-12-03 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-12-03 Time 11:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-12-03 Time 11:49 Sent To  
Notes
2016-12-03 11:49:34 
 IMPACT FEES
 BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT
 FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL
 PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND
 A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT
 APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE
 INFORMATION.
  
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2016-01-21 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-01-21 Time 09:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-01-21 Time 09:01 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-21 09:03:16****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT BY PALM BEACH COUNTY REQUIRED.
  
 PLEASE SEE BUILDING PROVISO REGARDING SQUARE FOOT AREA
 DISCREPANCY. IF IMPACT FEES ARE NOT PAID ON THE LARGER
 AREA (23,576), AN EXPLANATION OF THE DISCREPANCY IS
 REQUIRED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE.
  
  
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-10-05 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2015-10-05 Time 16:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2015-10-05 Time 16:04 Sent To  
Notes
2015-10-05 16:04:36 
 IMPACT FEES
 BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT
 FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL
 PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND
 A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT
 APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE
 INFORMATION.
 JAMES A. WITMER CBO
 SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 TEL: 561-805-6715
 FAX: 561-805-6676
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-03-26 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2015-03-26 Time 13:29 Rev Time  
Received By jwitmer Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2015-03-26 13:29:32IMPACT FEES
 BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT
 FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL
 PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND
 A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT
 APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE
 INFORMATION
  
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 6 Status P Date 2017-05-18 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2017-05-18 Time 08:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2017-05-18 Time 07:07 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2017-02-17 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2017-02-17 Time 15:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2017-02-17 Time 14:27 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2016-12-15 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2016-12-15 Time 09:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2016-12-15 Time 07:09 Sent To  
Notes
2016-12-15 11:44:451ST REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL
 PERMIT #15020937
 12/15/16
  
 1) PLEASE CLARIFY OR CORRECT THE FOLLOWING CONFLICTS
 CONCERNING THE HEATING CAPACITIES FOR THE AHU'S:
  
 A) THE ENERGYGAUGE COMPLIANCE DATA FORM INDICATES
 136520 BTUH ELECTRIC FURNACE CAPACITIES FOR AHU 1-1 AND
 1-2 , HOWEVER NO ELECTRIC DATA IS LISTED IN THE
 SCHEDULES FOR THE UNITS ON M4.2, AND DUCT HEATERS AT 40
 KW EACH ARE SPECIFIED FOR BOTH SYSTEMS.
  
 B) THE AC LOAD CALCULATIONS INDICATE 87,461 BTUH
 (25.6KW) HEATING REQUIRED FOR AHU 1-1, AND 24,624 BTUH
 (7.2KW) FOR AHU 1-2 WHICH INDICATES THE DUCT HEATERS
 HAVE BEEN OVERSIZED.
  
 C) THE HEATING CAPACITIES FOR AHU'S 1-4 & 2-1 ARE
 OVERSIZED BASED ON THE CALCULATED LOADS.
  
 2) PROVIDE COMPLIANCE DATA FOR THE CHILLER IN THE
 ENERGYGAUGE SUBMITTAL- SEE TABLE C403.2.3(7) FBC-14
 ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 3) M5.2: PROVIDE THE WIND LOAD DESIGN CRITERIA FOR
 ATTACHMENT OF THE CHILLER- SEE SECTION 301.15.
  
 4) PROVIDE WIND LOAD ENGINEERING AND DESIGN CRITERIA
 FOR ATTACHMENT OF THE ROOFTOP FGI GRAVITY INTAKE HOOD.
  
 5) SHOW THE REQUIRED CLEARANCES FOR THE GRAVITY INTAKE
 ON THE ROOF PER SECTION 401.4, AND INDICATE HOW THE
 OPENING WILL BE PROTECTED PER SECTION 401.5.
  
 6) INDICATE THE REQUIRED CLEARANCE DISTANCE
 MEASUREMENTS FOR THE EXHAUST OUTLETS PER SECTION
 501.3.1 AND SUBMIT A FL. PRODUCT APPROVAL OR MIAMI-DADE
 NOA FOR THE LOUVER- RULE 9N-3 DEPT. OF COMMUNITY
 AFFAIRS.
  
 7) PROVIDE SUBMITTALS FOR THE FIRE DAMPERS AND O/A
 MOTORIZED DAMPERS, AND PROVIDE INSTALLATION DETAILS ON
 THE PLANS.
  
 CHRISTOPHER L. COLE
 MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6719
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2015-12-22 Cont ID  
Sent By ccole Date 2015-12-22 Time 11:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2015-12-22 Time 11:17 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-22 11:21:03MECHANICAL PROVISO:
  
 1) PRIOR TO1ST INSPECTION, THE CONTRACTOR MUST SUBMIT
 FL. PRODUCT APPROVALS AND/OR MIAMI-DADE NOA'S FOR THE
 ROOF STANDS AND THE LOUVERS.
  
 CHRISTOPHER L. COLE
 MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6719
 [email protected]
  
  
  
  
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-09-09 Cont ID  
Sent By HMoser Date 2015-09-09 Time 14:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ccole Date 2015-09-09 Time 14:42 Sent To  
Notes
2015-09-09 15:45:422ND REVIEW: FBC 2010 MECHANICAL
 PERMIT #15020937
 9/9/2015
  
 1) PROVIDE AC COOLING AND HEATING LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR
 THE CHILLER, AHU'S, FCU'S, & AHU/CU 1 & 2. REFER TO
 SECTION 503.2.1 FBC-10 ENERGY CONSERVATION: CALCULATION
 OF HEATING AND COOLING LOADS.
 DESIGN LOADS SHALL BE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 PROCEDURES DESCRIBED IN THE ASHRAE/ACCA STANDARD 183 OR
 ACCA MANUAL N AND SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THE CODE
 COMPLIANCE FORM SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT
 WHEN THE BUILDING IS PERMITTED OR, IN THE EVENT THE
 MECHANICAL PERMIT IS OBTAINED AT A LATER TIME, THE
 SIZING CALCULATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE
 APPLICATION FOR THE MECHANICAL PERMIT. HEATING AND
 COOLING LOADS SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOUNT FOR LOAD
 REDUCTIONS THAT ARE ACHIEVED WHEN ENERGY RECOVERY
 SYSTEMS ARE UTILIZED IN THE HVAC SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH THE ASHRAE HVAC SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT HANDBOOK.
 ALTERNATIVELY, DESIGN LOADS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY AN
 APPROVED EQUIVALENT COMPUTATION PROCEDURE, USING THE
 DESIGN PARAMETERS SPECIFIED IN CHAPTER 3.
 2) PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS IN COMPLIANCE WITH
 SECTION 501.2 FBC-10 ENERGY CONSERVATION. SUBMIT TWO
 COPIES OF FORM 502 FOR PRESCRIPTIVE COMPLIANCE, OR FORM
 506 FOR PERFORMANCE BASED COMPLIANCE USING COMMISION
 APPROVED SOFTWARE PRINTOUT.
 4) SHEET M0.1: APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES SHALL ALSO
 INCLUDE THE FBC-10 ENERGY CONSERVATION CODE. PLEASE
 REVIEW AND REVISE.
 5) SHEET M0.1: THE VENTILATION CALCULATION TABLE IS NOT
 INDICATING ANY O/A CFM'S FOR THE CORRIDOR. PER TABLE
 403.3, VENTILATION SHALL BE PROVIDED AT .06 CFM'S PER
 SQ. FT. PLEASE REVISE THE TABLE ACCORDINGLY.
 6) M2.1: DAMPERS MISSING AT THESE LOCATIONS- A) 18"X14"
 DUCT PENETRATING RATED WALL BETWEEN CORRIDOR 1-002 AND
 ROOM 1-111. B) 8" ROUND DUCT PENETRATING RATED WALL
 BETWEEN CORRIDOR 1-002 AND ROOM 1-111A. C) 12"X12" DUCT
 PENETRATING RATED WALL BETWEEN CORRIDOR 1-009 & ROOM
 1-201.
 7) M2.2: DAMPERS MISSING AT THESE LOCATIONS- A) 14"X14"
 DUCT PENETRATING THE RATED WALL BETWEEN CORRIDOR 1-006
 AND ROOM 1-202. B) 8" ROUND DUCT PENETRATING THE RATED
 WALL BETWEEN ROOM 1-202 AND CORRIDOR 1-009.
 8) M2.1 & M2.2: PLEASE CLARIFY WHY ALL OF THE AC DUCTS
 PENETRATING THE SMOKE PARTITIONS ON THE PLANS HAVE
 SMOKE DAMPERS BUT NONE OF THE EXHAUST DUCTS PENETRATING
 THOSE WALLS HAVE DAMPERS.
 9) M2.3: THE CHILLER DETAIL IS REFERENCING THE
 STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR ANCHORING THE UNIT, HOWEVER THE
 DETAIL ON SHEET S-4.3 DOES NOT INDICATE HOW THE CHILLER
 IS TO BE TIED DOWN TO THE CURB. PLEASE REVISE THE
 DETAIL.
 10) M2.3: PROVIDE WINDLOAD TIE DOWN ENGINEERING FOR
 ANCHORING THE DUCT STANDS- SECTION 301.12 FBC-10
 MECHANICAL.
 11) M6.1: PROVIDE A NARRATIVE TO CLARIFY HOW THE
 DIGITAL CONTROL SYSTEM WILL FUNCTION WITH THE HVAC
 SYSTEM- REFER TO SECTION 503.2.4 FBC-10 ENERGY
 CONSERVATION.
  
 CHRISTOPHER L. COLE
 MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6719
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-04-21 Cont ID  
Sent By hmoser Date 2015-04-21 Time 10:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By hmoser Date 2015-04-20 Time 14:51 Sent To  
Notes
2015-04-21 10:25:45PLAN DENIED
 1) REFER TO SECTION 1022.4 PENETRATIONS 2010 FBC
 ( MINI SPLITS IN STAIRWELL )
 2) PROVIDE A DETAIL SHOWING THE CONDENSER STAND
 TIEDOWN TO ROOF AND CONDENSER TIE DOWN TO STAND
 PER SECTION 301.12 WIND RESISTANCE 2010 FBC (M)
  
 PLAN REVIEW BY HAROLD MOSER
 [email protected]
 OFFICE 561-805-6732
 FAX 561-805-6676
  
  
Review Stop NFIP NFIP REVIEW ACTIVITY
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2016-12-03 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-12-03 Time 11:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-12-03 Time 11:49 Sent To  
Notes
2016-12-03 11:51:05DFE PER PLAN = 8.96' NGVD29
  
 BUILDING UNDER CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION CERTIFICATE OR
 FORM BOARD SURVEY SHOWING PROPOSED ELEVATIONS IS
 REQUIRED PRIOR TO CONCRETE POUR
 FINISHED CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION CERTIFICATE IS REQUIRED
 PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION.
  
 PROPOSED STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN SFHA A5. THE FIRST
 FLOOR PROPOSED FFE IS 8.46
  
 ELEVATION CERTIFICATE / FORM BOARD SURVEY REQUIRED
 PRIOR TO CONCRETE POUR
 FINISHED CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION CERTIFICATE REQUIRED
 PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION
  
  
  
Review Stop NFIP NFIP REVIEW ACTIVITY
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2016-01-20 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-01-20 Time 16:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-01-20 Time 16:17 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-20 16:20:29PROPOSED STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN SFHA A5. THE FIRST
 FLOOR PROPOSED FFE IS 8.46
  
 ELEVATION CERTIFICATE / FORM BOARD SURVEY REQUIRED
 PRIOR TO CONCRETE POUR
 FINISHED CONSTRUCTION ELEVATION CERTIFICATE REQUIRED
 PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION
  
  
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 7 Status P Date 2017-05-02 Cont ID  
Sent By gjohnson Date 2017-05-02 Time 11:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gjohnson Date 2017-05-02 Time 10:04 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 6 Status P Date 2017-03-28 Cont ID  
Sent By gjohnson Date 2017-03-28 Time 13:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gjohnson Date 2017-03-28 Time 13:41 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2017-02-15 Cont ID  
Sent By gjohnson Date 2017-02-15 Time 09:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gjohnson Date 2017-02-15 Time 09:28 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2016-12-03 Cont ID  
Sent By gjohnson Date 2016-12-02 Time 16:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By gjohnson Date 2016-12-01 Time 08:48 Sent To  
Notes
2016-12-02 17:41:341ST REVIEW
  
 GEORGE JOHNSON
 PLUMBING PLANS EXAMINER LL
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
 BUILDING DIVISION
 561-805-6711
 [email protected]
  
 PLUMBING COMMENTS:
  
 1. THE BATHROOMS IN THE CLASS ROOMS ON FIRST FLOOR
 SHOULD COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE YOUNGER
 CHILDREN IN THE ADVISORY CHART FBC ACC 604.9
  
 2. THE RIM OF LAVATORY'S IN ALL THE CHILDREN'S
 BATHROOMS SHOULD BE SET AT 31" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR.
 PER FBC ACC 606.2
  
 3. SEPARATE FACILITIES FOR EACH SEX ARE REQUIRED FOR
 THE STAFF BATHROOMS. PER FBC PL 403.2
  
 4. SHT. A4.2 DETAIL 03 PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIMENSION
 FROM THE SIDE WALL OF TOILET TO THE PARTITION NEXT TO
 LAV IT SHALL BE A MIN OF 84" 85 " TO ALLOW FOR
 CONSTRUCTION TOLERANCES. PER FBC PL 604.3.1
  
 5. SHT. A4.2 DETAIL 01 THE WIDTH OF 6' 8" DOES NOT
 ALLOW FOR COMPLIANCE WITH FBC PL 604.3.1 IT SHALL BE
 84" 85 " TO ALLOW FOR CONSTRUCTION TOLERANCES.
  
 6.SHT A4.2 DETAIL 04 PROVIDE DIMENSION FROM SIDEWALL OF
 TOILET TO THE PARTITION TO COMPLY WITH FBC PL604.3.1
  
 7. SHT. 3.1 SANITARY RISER
 A) FIRST FLOOR RM 180 THE FLOOR DRAIN SHALL BE
 INDIVIDUALLY VENTED. PER FBC PL 901.2 AND 901.2.1
 B)FIST FLOOR RM 181 THE FLOOR DRAIN SHALL CONNECT WITH
 FIXTURE BRANCH OF SERVICE SINK NO BUILDING DRAIN. PER
 FBC PL 901.2 AND 901.2.1
 C)SECONDD FLOOR IN ROOM 280 THE FLOOR DRAIN SHALL BE
 INDIVIDUALLY VENTED. PER FBC PL 901.2 AND 901.2.1
 D) SECON FLOOR THE EWC SHALL CONNECT DOWN STREAM OF THE
 BATHROOM GROUPS.FBC PL 909.1
  
 8 SHT. P8.1 DETAIL 7 THE HOT WATER RECIRCULATION RETURN
 LINE SHALL CONNECT TO COLD WATER INLET OF WATER HEATER
 AND THE TEMPERING VALVE. PER FBC PL 607.2.3
  
 9. SHT.P5.1 ROOF AREAS G,F,I,J HAVE A NOTE ON THEM THAT
 STATES HORIZONTAL STORM DRAIN SIZE = 3" 657 SF MAX THIS
 IS UNDER THE SF OF THESE AREAS PLEASE CLARIFY. PER WPB
 AMEND TO FBC 107.2.1
  
 10. SHT. P5.1 THE OVERFLOW DRAIN SHALL BE SIZED THE
 SAME AS THE PRIMARY DRAIN. PER FBC PL 1107.3
  
 11. PLEASE PROVIDE SF AND SLOPE ON THE STORM RISER
 DIAGRAM. PER WPB AMEND TO FBC 107.2.1
  
 12. SHT. P6.1 DETAIL 1 THE NOTE ON 1" CD DN TO FIRST
 FLOOR SHOULD READ DN FROM 2ND FLOOR PLEASE CLARIFY. PER
 WPB AMEND TO FBC 107.2.1
  
 13. ARE ANY OF THE CLASSROOMS BEING USED AS A SCIENCE
 LAB THAT WILL USW CHEMICALS IF SO PLEASE PROVIDE TYPE
 OF CHEMICAL MSDS SHEETS THE AMOUNTS AND HOW THERE BEING
 STORED. PER WPB AMEND TO FBC 107.2.1
  
  
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2015-12-23 Cont ID  
Sent By tklarge Date 2015-12-23 Time 06:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tklarge Date 2015-12-23 Time 04:44 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-09-30 Cont ID  
Sent By TLarge Date 2015-09-26 Time 13:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tklarge Date 2015-09-26 Time 08:25 Sent To  
Notes
2015-09-26 10:20:30SUBMIT CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW.THE DESIGN
 PROFESSIONAL'S RESPONSE OF " CIVIL DRAWINGS WERE
 SUBMITTED BY THE CIVIL ENGINEER FOR REVIEW ON APRIL 21,
 2015 " DOES NOT HELP ME IN APPROVING THIS PROJECT. I
 HAVE NOT REVIEWED ANY CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR THIS PROJECT
 AND I NEED TO REVIEW SPECIFIC SHEETS THAT SHOW THE
 CONTINUATION OF THE WATER AND SANITARY LINES FROM THE
 BUILDING. THE CIVIL DRAWINGS WERE PROBABLY SUBMITTED TO
 THE CWPB ENGINEERING DEPT. 2ND REQUEST.
  
 PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW
 TIM LARGE
 CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR
 561-805-6692
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-04-01 Cont ID  
Sent By tklarge Date 2015-04-01 Time 14:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tklarge Date 2015-03-30 Time 12:58 Sent To  
Notes
2015-04-01 12:29:311) LIFE SAFETY SHEETS - THE BUILDING INFORMATION BOX
 SHOWS THE OCCUPANCY REQUIREMENTS FOR EDUCATION AT 20
 SQUARE FEET PER PERSON YET LIFE SAFETY PLAN LS1.1 SHOWS
 THE OCCUPANT LOAD AS 35 SQUARE FEET PER PERSON. CLARIFY
 AND ENSURE THAT THE OCCUPANT LOADS OF THE AREAS ARE
 BASED ON TABLE 1004.1.1 OF THE 2010 FBC.
 2) SHT. T1 & PLUMBING SHEETS OF THE PLANS I REVIEWED
 REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS. THERE WERE NO CIVIL DRAWINGS
 IN THE SET OF PLANS I REVIEWED. CLARIFY.
 3) SHT.LS 1.2 IS MISSING FORM THE SET OF PLANS I
 REVIEWED. SUBMIT SHEET FOR REVIEW.
 4) SHT. A8.2 - ENLARGED RESTROOM PLANS 02 03, 04, DO
 NOT COMPLY WITH THE 2010 FL. ACCESSIBILITY CODE SEC.
 604.3, 606. THE MINIMUM REQUIRED WIDTH IS 85" IF BUILT
 PERFECT. 86 INCHES ALLOWS FOR CONSTRUCTION TOLERANCES.
 5) SHT. A8.2 - DETAIL # 06 - IT APPEARS THAT THE DOOR
 MAY SWING INTO THE CLEAR FLOOR SPACE FOR THE LAVATORY
 IN ACCESSIBLE STALL IN THE MALE AND FEMALE RESTROOM.
 FAC SEC.604.8.1.2.
 6) CLEARLY SHOW THE DIMENSIONS OF THE LENGTH AND WIDTH
 OF THE CLEAR FLOOR SPACES FOR THE LAVATORIES AND THE
 WATER CLOSETS IN THE ACCESSIBLE TOILET COMPARTMENTS AND
 TOILET ROOMS. FAC SECS.604.3 & 606.2.
 7) VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY IS REQUIRED TO THE SECOND
 FLOOR PER THE 2010 FAC SEC.201.1.1.
 8) FLOOR DRAINS AND HOSE BIBBS ARE REQUIRED IN THE
 GROUP TOILET ROOMS PER THE 2010 FBC SEC.443.3.5.6.
 9) SHT. P4.1 - CLINIC RESTROOM - THERE IS AN ARROW THAT
 POINTS TO "2 " SANITARY UP" BUT NOTHING IS SHOWN.
 CLRIFY.
 10) SHT.P4.1 - ADULT RESTROOM # 1-103 - THE LAYOUT ON
 THE RISER DOESN'T CORRELATE WITH THE FLOOR PLAN.
 CLARIFY.
 11) SHT. P4.1 - THE 2" LINE ON RISER BY EWC SAYS 2"
 SANITARY UP BUT IS NOT CONNECTED TO THE BUILDING DRAIN
 & TERMINATES NOWHERE. CLARIFY.
 12) SHT. P4.1 - A WATER CLOSET IS MISSING FROM THE
 RISER FOR TOILET ROOMS 1-106 & 1-107A.
 13) THE SANITARY RISER APPEARS TO MISSING PIPING FROM
 RESTROOMS 106-A & 107-A.
 14) SHT. P4.1 - SINK SK-1 IN THE ART LAB IS NOT
 CONNECTED TO THE SANITARY SYSTEM.
 15) SUBMIT SPECIFICATIONS ON THE SOLIDS INTERCEPTOR
 ZURN ZA - 1184. WPB AMEND. TO 2010 FBC SEC. 107.2.1.
 16) SHT. P4.1 - SIZE THE VENT FOR SINK SK-1 IN THE ART
 LAB.
 17) SHT.P4.1 - THE ARE NUMEROUS SECTIONS OF THE
 SANITARY RISER WHERE PIPNG HAS NO CONNECTION POINTS AND
 TERMINATES NOWHERE. SUBMIT A SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM
 THAT CLEARLY REFLECTS ALL AREAS OF THE INSTALLATION.
 EXPAND THE CONDENSED AREAS OF THE RISER DIAGRAM SO IT
 IS CLEAR AND LEGIBLE. WPB AMEND. TO 2010 FBC SEC.
 107.3.5.1.3.
 18) SHT. P4.1 - PLUMBING FIXTURE SCHEDULE - THE MINIMUM
 TRAP SIZE FOR SINKS SHALL BE 1 1/2" NOT 1 1/4" AS SHOWN
 PER FPC TABLE 709.1.
 19) SHT. P4.2 - SIZE ALL SECTIONS OF THE WATER RISER.
 WPB AMEND. TO 2010 FBC SEC. 107.3.5.1.3.
 20) SHT. P4.2 HAS NOTATION "WC-1" BUT NOTHING IS SHOWN.
 REFER TO SHT. P3.1 FOR LOCATION. SEE AREA BY GRID LINE
 H11.
 21) SIZE THE WATER RISERS TO THE 2ND FLOOR.
 22) SHT. P5.3 - A COMPLETE AND THOROUGH REVIEW CANNOT
 BE ACCOMPLISHED ON THE STORMWATER RISER BECAUSE IT IS
 INCOMPLETE; LINES TERMINATE NOWHERE, LINES ARE MISSING,
 ETC. SUBMIT A COMPLETE, CLEAR AND LEGIBLE STORMWATER
 RISER DIAGRAM FOR REVIEW. WPB AMEND. TO 2010 FBC SEC.
 107.3.5.1.3.
 23) SHT. P5.2 - THE DESIGN OF THE STORMWATER SYSTEM
 SHALL INCLUDE 1/2 THE AREA OF ANY VERTICAL WALL THAT
 DIVERTS WATER TO THE ROOF. SHOW THAT THE AREA OF THE
 PARAPET WALL HAS BEEN ADDED INTO THE STORMWATER DESIGN
 PER THE 2010 FPC SEC.1106.4.
 24) SHT. P7.1 - THE PLAN SHOWS THE WATER HEATER BEING
 BOTTOM FED BY THE RECIRCULATING LINE. A VACUUM RELIEF
 VALVE IS REQUIRED ON THIS LINE PER SEC. 504.2 OF 2010
 FPC.
 25) SHT. P7.2 - THE DOMESTIC WATER DEMAND TABLE REFERS
 TO TABLE E103.2(2). THERE IS NO SUCH TABLE . CLARIFY.
 26.) DOES THIS SCHOOL ALSO HAVE DAYCARE OR WILL IT BE
 USED AS A DAYCARE FACILITY AT ANY TIME? DAYCARE
 FACILITIES SHALL COMPLY W/ 2010 FBC SEC. 436.
  
  
 PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW
 TIM LARGE
 CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR
 561-805-6692
 [email protected]
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2017-04-25 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-02-14 Time 12:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-02-14 Time 12:51 Sent To  
Notes
2017-02-14 12:54:19PRODUCT APPROVALS TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED BY DESIGNER
 OF RECORD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION
  
 SEPARATE ROOF PERMIT APPLICATION, PRODUCT APPROVALS,
 ENGINEERING (IF APPLICABLE) REQUIRED
  
 COMPLY WITH DESIGN PRESSURES ON PAGE S1.3
  
 ZONE 2: +47 / -193
 ZONE 3: +47 / -290
  
  
  
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2016-12-03 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-12-03 Time 11:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-12-03 Time 11:54 Sent To  
Notes
2016-12-03 11:56:30SEE BUILDING REVIEW FOR COMMENTS REGARDING WIND DESIGN
 CRITERIA
  
 A SEPARATE ROOF PERMIT IS REQUIRED. IF ROOFING
 INFORMATION IS NOT PROVIDED AND REVIEWED PRIOR TO
 PERMIT ISSUANCE (PRODUCT APPROVAL REVIEWED BY DOR,
 SELECTED ASSEMBLY, ENGINEERING IF APPLICABLE), THE
 INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AS A
 REVISION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
  
  
Review Stop R ROOF PLAN REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2016-01-20 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-01-20 Time 14:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-01-20 Time 14:01 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-20 14:03:07ROOF SUB PERMIT REQUIRED
  
 PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR ROOF SYSTEM (METAL DECK, R19
 TAPERED INSULATION AND CONCRETE DECK, R19 TAPERED
 INSULATION, PREFAB SKYLIGHT SYSTEM) REVIEWED BY DOR IS
 REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT PRIOR TO
 INSTALLATION.
  
 ROOF COMPONENTS & CLADDING TO COMPLY WITH DESIGN
 PRESSURES SPECIFIED ON SHEET S6.1:
  
 VULT (MULTIPLY BY .6)
  
 ZONE 1, -95.6
 ZONE 2, -160.30
 ZONE 3, -241.3
  
  
  
Review Stop THRESHOLD THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2017-04-25 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-04-25 Time 07:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-04-25 Time 07:58 Sent To  
Notes
2017-04-25 08:01:30RESIDENT INSPECTOR APPROVED PER KEN CONRAD UNDER
 FOUNDATION PERMIT 17040644
 KRES MIHELICH, AR0010560
 TOMMY TAVARES, PE (INSPECTOR, ADDED 6/3/17)
  
  
Review Stop THRESHOLD THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2017-03-22 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2017-03-22 Time 18:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2017-03-22 Time 18:29 Sent To  
Notes
2017-03-22 18:29:16****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 SEE NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW (ALSO BELOW). DUE TO THE
 REDESIGN, IT IS NOT CLEAR IF IT IS REQUIRED, BUT MAY BE
 BENEFICIAL TO THE CONTRACTOR'S SCHEDULE.
  
 PLEASE CONTACT ME PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL OR, WHEN
 RESUBMITTING, PROVIDE THREE COMPLETE SETS OF PERMIT
 DOCUMENTS.
  
 PREVIOUS REVIEW:
  
 RESIDENT INSPECTOR REQUIRED
 SOILS/SITEWORK MONITORING BY A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
 REQUIRED
  
 W. P. B. PERMIT: 15020937
 ADD: 1901 S. FLAGLER DR.
 CONT: IBIS BUILDING CORP.
 TEL: (561)318-8408
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W
 * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION
 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013.
 3RD REVIEW
 DATE: JAN 20, 2016
 ACTION: DENIED
  
 1) 3RD REQUEST. THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A RESIDENT
 INSPECTOR.
 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING
 CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 110.3.9 OTHER
 INSPECTIONS SERVICES. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY MAKE,
 OR CAUSE TO BE MADE BY OTHERS, THE INSPECTIONS REQUIRED
 BY SECTION 109. HE/SHE MAY ACCEPT REPORTS OF INSPECTORS
 OF RECOGNIZED INSPECTION SERVICES, PROVIDED THAT AFTER
 INVESTIGATION HE/SHE IS SATISFIED AS TO THEIR
 QUALIFICATIONS AND RELIABILITY. A CERTIFICATE CALLED
 FOR BY ANY PROVISION OF THE TECHNICAL CODES SHALL NOT
 BE BASED ON SUCH REPORTS UNLESS THE SAME ARE IN WRITING
 AND CERTIFIED BY A RESPONSIBLE OFFICER OF SUCH SERVICE.
 THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY REQUIRE THE OWNER TO EMPLOY
 AN INSPECTION SERVICE IN THE FOLLOWING INSTANCES:
  
 1. FOR BUILDINGS OR ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II
 CONSTRUCTION
 2. FOR ALL MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS
 3. WHERE THE CONCRETE DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE
 STRENGTH (F ?C) IN EXCESS OF 3000
 POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH
 4. FOR PILE DRIVING
 5. FOR BUILDINGS WITH AREA GREATER THAN 20,000 SQUARE
 FOOT
 6. FOR BUILDINGS MORE THAN 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT
 7. FOR BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN OR
 METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION
  
 1A) FOR THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PLEASE PROVIDE A RESUME'
 OF INSPECTION EXPERIENCE ON PREVIOUS PROJECT. THE
 RESUME' MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY ALL CERTIFICATES AS
 SPECIFIED HEREIN. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS DESIGNEE
 WILL REVIEW THE RESUME'. AFTER THE RESUME' IS REVIEWED,
 AN INTERVIEW WILL BE SCHEDULED. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES
 WILL AN INSPECTOR BE INTERVIEWED FOR WORK WITHOUT FIRST
 MEETING THE ABOVE CRITERIA.
 CONTACT KEN CONRAD
 TEL: 561-805-6666
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 1B) THE CONTRACTOR WILL PRODUCE A JOB SUMMARY OR
 HISTORY FOR THIS TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. THIS MAY BE
 SUBMITTED TO KEN CONRAD BY E-MAIL. KEN CONRAD:
 [email protected]
  
 1C) NOTE FOR PAPER PLANS 3 SETS OF DOCUMENTS ARE
 REQUIRED INCLUDING SOILS REPORTS, ENERGY CALCS AND
 PRODUCT APPROVALS. FOR DIGITAL PLANS, AFTER PERMIT
 ISSUANCE, THE PERMIT LIBRARIAN WILL E-MAIL YOU, THE
 APPROVED AND BATCH STAMPED PLANS SO YOU MAY PRINT YOUR
 PLANS, TWO SETS OF PLANS WILL NEED TO BE PRINTED IN
 COLOR, (1) FOR THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR, THE OTHER FOR
 THE MEP INSPECTORS.
  
 2. PURSUANT TO THE RECOMMENDATION OF ARDAMAN &
 ASSOCIATES LETTER DATED 3/31/2015, A GEOTECHNICAL
 ENGINEER SHALL MONITOR THE SITEWORK (EXCAVATION OF
 MUCK, COMPACTION AND FILL). IF ARDAMAN & ASSOCIATES IS
 NOT RETAINED TO PERFORM THE MONITORING, PROVIDE
 INFORMATION REGARDING THE COMPANY WHO WILL PROVIDE THIS
 SERVICE.
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop THRESHOLD THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2016-12-03 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-12-03 Time 11:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-12-03 Time 11:57 Sent To  
Notes
2016-12-03 11:57:41****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 SEE NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW (ALSO BELOW). DUE TO THE
 REDESIGN, IT IS NOT CLEAR IF IT IS REQUIRED, BUT MAY BE
 BENEFICIAL TO THE CONTRACTOR'S SCHEDULE.
  
 PLEASE CONTACT ME PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL OR, WHEN
 RESUBMITTING, PROVIDE THREE COMPLETE SETS OF PERMIT
 DOCUMENTS.
  
 PREVIOUS REVIEW:
  
 RESIDENT INSPECTOR REQUIRED
 SOILS/SITEWORK MONITORING BY A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
 REQUIRED
  
 W. P. B. PERMIT: 15020937
 ADD: 1901 S. FLAGLER DR.
 CONT: IBIS BUILDING CORP.
 TEL: (561)318-8408
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W
 * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION
 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013.
 3RD REVIEW
 DATE: JAN 20, 2016
 ACTION: DENIED
  
 1) 3RD REQUEST. THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A RESIDENT
 INSPECTOR.
 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING
 CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 110.3.9 OTHER
 INSPECTIONS SERVICES. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY MAKE,
 OR CAUSE TO BE MADE BY OTHERS, THE INSPECTIONS REQUIRED
 BY SECTION 109. HE/SHE MAY ACCEPT REPORTS OF INSPECTORS
 OF RECOGNIZED INSPECTION SERVICES, PROVIDED THAT AFTER
 INVESTIGATION HE/SHE IS SATISFIED AS TO THEIR
 QUALIFICATIONS AND RELIABILITY. A CERTIFICATE CALLED
 FOR BY ANY PROVISION OF THE TECHNICAL CODES SHALL NOT
 BE BASED ON SUCH REPORTS UNLESS THE SAME ARE IN WRITING
 AND CERTIFIED BY A RESPONSIBLE OFFICER OF SUCH SERVICE.
 THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY REQUIRE THE OWNER TO EMPLOY
 AN INSPECTION SERVICE IN THE FOLLOWING INSTANCES:
  
 1. FOR BUILDINGS OR ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II
 CONSTRUCTION
 2. FOR ALL MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS
 3. WHERE THE CONCRETE DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE
 STRENGTH (F ?C) IN EXCESS OF 3000
 POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH
 4. FOR PILE DRIVING
 5. FOR BUILDINGS WITH AREA GREATER THAN 20,000 SQUARE
 FOOT
 6. FOR BUILDINGS MORE THAN 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT
 7. FOR BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN OR
 METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION
  
 1A) FOR THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PLEASE PROVIDE A RESUME'
 OF INSPECTION EXPERIENCE ON PREVIOUS PROJECT. THE
 RESUME' MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY ALL CERTIFICATES AS
 SPECIFIED HEREIN. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS DESIGNEE
 WILL REVIEW THE RESUME'. AFTER THE RESUME' IS REVIEWED,
 AN INTERVIEW WILL BE SCHEDULED. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES
 WILL AN INSPECTOR BE INTERVIEWED FOR WORK WITHOUT FIRST
 MEETING THE ABOVE CRITERIA.
 CONTACT KEN CONRAD
 TEL: 561-805-6666
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 1B) THE CONTRACTOR WILL PRODUCE A JOB SUMMARY OR
 HISTORY FOR THIS TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. THIS MAY BE
 SUBMITTED TO KEN CONRAD BY E-MAIL. KEN CONRAD:
 [email protected]
  
 1C) NOTE FOR PAPER PLANS 3 SETS OF DOCUMENTS ARE
 REQUIRED INCLUDING SOILS REPORTS, ENERGY CALCS AND
 PRODUCT APPROVALS. FOR DIGITAL PLANS, AFTER PERMIT
 ISSUANCE, THE PERMIT LIBRARIAN WILL E-MAIL YOU, THE
 APPROVED AND BATCH STAMPED PLANS SO YOU MAY PRINT YOUR
 PLANS, TWO SETS OF PLANS WILL NEED TO BE PRINTED IN
 COLOR, (1) FOR THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR, THE OTHER FOR
 THE MEP INSPECTORS.
  
 2. PURSUANT TO THE RECOMMENDATION OF ARDAMAN &
 ASSOCIATES LETTER DATED 3/31/2015, A GEOTECHNICAL
 ENGINEER SHALL MONITOR THE SITEWORK (EXCAVATION OF
 MUCK, COMPACTION AND FILL). IF ARDAMAN & ASSOCIATES IS
 NOT RETAINED TO PERFORM THE MONITORING, PROVIDE
 INFORMATION REGARDING THE COMPANY WHO WILL PROVIDE THIS
 SERVICE.
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop THRESHOLD THRESHOLD INSPECTOR DOCUMENTS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2016-01-20 Cont ID  
Sent By shill Date 2016-01-20 Time 10:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2016-01-20 Time 10:59 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-20 11:06:12RESIDENT INSPECTOR REQUIRED
 SOILS/SITEWORK MONITORING BY A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
 REQUIRED
  
 W. P. B. PERMIT: 15020937
 ADD: 1901 S. FLAGLER DR.
 CONT: IBIS BUILDING CORP.
 TEL: (561)318-8408
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W
 * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION
 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013.
 3RD REVIEW
 DATE: JAN 20, 2016
 ACTION: DENIED
  
 1) 3RD REQUEST. THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A RESIDENT
 INSPECTOR.
 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING
 CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 110.3.9 OTHER
 INSPECTIONS SERVICES. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY MAKE,
 OR CAUSE TO BE MADE BY OTHERS, THE INSPECTIONS REQUIRED
 BY SECTION 109. HE/SHE MAY ACCEPT REPORTS OF INSPECTORS
 OF RECOGNIZED INSPECTION SERVICES, PROVIDED THAT AFTER
 INVESTIGATION HE/SHE IS SATISFIED AS TO THEIR
 QUALIFICATIONS AND RELIABILITY. A CERTIFICATE CALLED
 FOR BY ANY PROVISION OF THE TECHNICAL CODES SHALL NOT
 BE BASED ON SUCH REPORTS UNLESS THE SAME ARE IN WRITING
 AND CERTIFIED BY A RESPONSIBLE OFFICER OF SUCH SERVICE.
 THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY REQUIRE THE OWNER TO EMPLOY
 AN INSPECTION SERVICE IN THE FOLLOWING INSTANCES:
  
 1. FOR BUILDINGS OR ADDITIONS OF TYPE I OR II
 CONSTRUCTION
 2. FOR ALL MAJOR STRUCTURAL ALTERATIONS
 3. WHERE THE CONCRETE DESIGN IS BASED ON COMPRESSIVE
 STRENGTH (F ?C) IN EXCESS OF 3000
 POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH
 4. FOR PILE DRIVING
 5. FOR BUILDINGS WITH AREA GREATER THAN 20,000 SQUARE
 FOOT
 6. FOR BUILDINGS MORE THAN 2 STORIES IN HEIGHT
 7. FOR BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN OR
 METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION
  
 1A) FOR THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PLEASE PROVIDE A RESUME'
 OF INSPECTION EXPERIENCE ON PREVIOUS PROJECT. THE
 RESUME' MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY ALL CERTIFICATES AS
 SPECIFIED HEREIN. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS DESIGNEE
 WILL REVIEW THE RESUME'. AFTER THE RESUME' IS REVIEWED,
 AN INTERVIEW WILL BE SCHEDULED. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES
 WILL AN INSPECTOR BE INTERVIEWED FOR WORK WITHOUT FIRST
 MEETING THE ABOVE CRITERIA.
 CONTACT KEN CONRAD
 TEL: 561-805-6666
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 1B) THE CONTRACTOR WILL PRODUCE A JOB SUMMARY OR
 HISTORY FOR THIS TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. THIS MAY BE
 SUBMITTED TO KEN CONRAD BY E-MAIL. KEN CONRAD:
 [email protected]
  
 1C) NOTE FOR PAPER PLANS 3 SETS OF DOCUMENTS ARE
 REQUIRED INCLUDING SOILS REPORTS, ENERGY CALCS AND
 PRODUCT APPROVALS. FOR DIGITAL PLANS, AFTER PERMIT
 ISSUANCE, THE PERMIT LIBRARIAN WILL E-MAIL YOU, THE
 APPROVED AND BATCH STAMPED PLANS SO YOU MAY PRINT YOUR
 PLANS, TWO SETS OF PLANS WILL NEED TO BE PRINTED IN
 COLOR, (1) FOR THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR, THE OTHER FOR
 THE MEP INSPECTORS.
  
 2. PURSUANT TO THE RECOMMENDATION OF ARDAMAN &
 ASSOCIATES LETTER DATED 3/31/2015, A GEOTECHNICAL
 ENGINEER SHALL MONITOR THE SITEWORK (EXCAVATION OF
 MUCK, COMPACTION AND FILL). IF ARDAMAN & ASSOCIATES IS
 NOT RETAINED TO PERFORM THE MONITORING, PROVIDE
 INFORMATION REGARDING THE COMPANY WHO WILL PROVIDE THIS
 SERVICE.
  
  
  
  
Review Stop X PERMIT EXTENSION
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2016-11-09 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 2016-07-25 Time 14:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 2016-07-25 Time 14:18 Sent To  
Notes
2016-11-09 14:26:55LETTER REQUEST FROM HARVARD JOLLY ARCHITECTURE. PERMIT
 APPLICATION EXTENDED TO 1/25/17.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 8 Status P Date 2017-06-12 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2017-06-12 Time 14:36 Rev Time 2.00
Received By eschneid Date 2017-06-08 Time 10:45 Sent To  
Notes
2017-06-12 14:37:17PASSED W/PROVISOS
  
 1) PRIOR TO THE C.O. OF THE BUILDING, A MINOR AMENDMENT
 IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION TO
 REFLECT THE CHANGES BASED ON THE NEW BUILDING SQUARE
 FOOTAGE AND THE RAMP.
  
 2) SEPARATE PERMITS, WITH PLANS, ARE REQUIRED FOR:
 A. LANDSCAPE
 B. BICYCLE RACK
 C. NEW FENCES AND GATES.
 D. EXTERIOR SIGNAGE
 E. FLAG POLE ? NOTE: THE MAXIMUM FLAG POLE HEIGHT IS 80
 FEET.
 F. SITE LIGHTING
 G. ARBOR STRUCTURE
 H. SECURITY KIOSK
 I. FABRIC CANOPIES
 J. HARDSCAPE
 K. PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 7 Status F Date 2017-05-17 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2017-05-17 Time 10:33 Rev Time 2.00
Received By eschneid Date 2017-05-16 Time 16:01 Sent To  
Notes
2017-05-17 10:40:14FAILED
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES.
  
 1) THE SITE DATE TABLE ON SHEET SP-3 SHOWS AN INCREASE
 IN THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE ACADEMIC BUILDING TO
 16,030 SF, YET THIS IS NOT REFLECTED ON THE BUILDING
 SHOWN ON THE PLAN - STILL SHOWS THE BUILDING AS HAVING
 15,996 SF. THE BUILDING ON SHEET C.1 ALSO SHOWS AS
 15,966. PLANS MUST BE INTERNALLY CONSISTENT.
  
 2) THE SETBACKS LISTED ON THE SITE DATA TABLE FOR THE
 EXISTING PBDA CONTINUE TO SHOW THE INCORRECT FRONT
 (SOUTH) AND REAR (NORTH) SETBACK. NOTE: THIS WAS
 CORRECTED ON THE PLANS APPROVED AS PART OF THE MINOR
 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT DATED APRIL 21, 2017.
  
 3) THE NEW RAMP BETWEEN THE EXISTING AND THE PROPOSED
 BUILDING IS NOT SHOWN ON SP-3. ALL PLANS SHALL SHOW THE
 SAME CONDITIONS.
  
 4) THE LOCATION OF THE NEW RAMP COMBINED WITH THE FENCE
 TO THE WEST OF THE BICYCLE RACKS, RESULT IN THE RACKS
 BEING BLOCKED AND NON-FUNCTIONAL. RELOCATE THE FENCE,
 THE BICYCLE RACKS OR THE RAMP SO THAT STUDENTS OR
 FACULTY WHO RIDE THEIR BICYCLES TO THE CAMPUS CAN
 ACCESS THE BICYCLE RACKS TO SECURE THEIR BICYCLES.
  
 5) SHEET AS3.2 SHOWS A NEW CANOPY PLAN DETAIL WHICH
 INCLUDES THE PROPOSED RAMP. THIS FAILS TO SHOW THE
 BICYCLE RACK AND FENCE MENTIONED IN COMMENT NO. 4. IT
 NEEDS TO SHOW ALL FEATURES IN THE AREA.
  
 6) SHEETS A1.01 AND A1.1 NEED TO SHOW THE BICYCLE RACK
 IF IT WILL REMAIN IN PLACE (THIS REQUIRES THE
 RELOCATION OF THE FENCE).
  
 7) THE OIL AND GAS INTERCEPTOR SHOWN ON SHEET C.1 MUST
 BE RELOCATED SO THAT IT DOES NOT INTERFERE WITH THE
 TREES APPROVED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IN THE SAME
 LOCATION. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CURRENTLY SHOWN
 IMPERVIOUS AREAS INCLUDE THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE, SO
 STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE OGI BE LOCATED UNDERNEATH A
 SIDEWALK OR OTHER PAVED AREA.
  
 8) THE ROOF PLAN AND ELEVATIONS DO NOT SHOW ANY
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FOR THE ELEVATOR EXTENDING ABOVE
 THE ROOF. PLEASE VERIFY THIS IS CORRECT. STAFF IS USED
 TO SEEING ELEVATORS HAVE EQUIPMENT EXTEND ABOVE THE
 ROOFLINE.
  
 9) A NEW MINOR AMENDMENT IS REQUIRED TO REFLECT THE
 CHANGES BASED ON THE NEW BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE AND
 THE RAMP.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446.
 [email protected]
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 6 Status P Date 2017-04-04 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2017-04-04 Time 08:52 Rev Time 2.00
Received By eschneid Date 2017-04-04 Time 08:52 Sent To  
Notes
2017-04-04 11:45:21PASSED W/PROVISO
  
 PROVISO - THE WALKWAY CANOPY SUPPORT POSTS NEED TO BE
 LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO COCOANUT
 LANE.
  
 SEPARATE PERMITS, WITH PLANS, ARE REQUIRED FOR:
  
 A. LANDSCAPE
 B. BICYCLE RACK
 C. NEW FENCES AND GATES.
 D. EXTERIOR SIGNAGE
 E. FLAG POLE
 F. SITE LIGHTING
 G. ARBOR STRUCTURE
 H. SECURITY KIOSK
 I. FABRIC CANOPIES
 J. HARDSCAPE
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2017-02-22 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2017-02-22 Time 15:16 Rev Time 2.00
Received By eschneid Date 2017-02-17 Time 13:49 Sent To  
Notes
2017-02-22 15:19:43FAILED
  
 1) THE COTLEUR HEARING SITE PLAN DOES NOT PROVIDE THE
 CORRECT DATA TABLES. THIS PLAN INCLUDES NEITHER THE
 TABLES ON THE CURRENTLY APPROVED PLANS NOR THE TABLES
 TO REFLECT THE PLANS UNDER REVIEW AS THE MINOR
 AMENDMENT. PROVIDE SHEET SP-3 AS UPDATED BY THE MINOR
 AMENDMENT COMMENTS ISSUED ON FEBRUARY 22, 2017.
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF AN UPDATED
 SURVEY SHOWING THE RELOCATED EASEMENTS AND ALL FEATURES
 IN THE AREA OF WORK. THE SURVEY NEEDS TO BE BASED ON
 THE RECENTLY RECORDED PLAT SO THAT IT IS AN ACCURATE
 DEPICTION OF THE SITE CONDITIONS SO THAT STAFF CAN
 VERIFY THAT THE BUILDING PLACEMENT COMPLIES WITH
 SETBACKS AND DOES NOT ENCROACH ON ANY EASEMENTS.
  
 3) THE SITE PLAN PREPARED BY COTLEUR AND HEARING, DATED
 JANUARY 3, 2017, AND PROVIDED TO THE CITY AS PART OF
 THE MINOR AMENDMENT RESUBMITTAL SHOWS A SETBACK OF 24.1
 FEET TO THE NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE (CLOSEST POINT
 NORTHERN STAIRWAY) WHILE THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN
 PREPARED BY HARVARD JOLLY AND SUBMITTED WITH THE PERMIT
 SHOWS A SETBACK OF 22 FEET 1 INCHES. ALL PLANS SHALL
 SHOW THE SAME, ACCURATE SETBACK DIMENSIONS. PLEASE NOTE
 THAT THE CIVIL PLAN DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY SETBACK
 INFORMATION WHICH STAFF COULD HAVE USED TO DETERMINE
 WHICH SET OF PLANS IS ACCURATE.
  
 4) REPEAT COMMENT: IT APPEARS THAT THE WALKWAY CANOPY
 OVERHANGS THE NEW COCOANUT LANE RIGHT-OF-WAY, WHICH IS
 NOT PERMITTED. THIS WILL BE VERIFIED ONCE THE SURVEY IS
 REVISED BASED ON THE RECORDED PLAT. NOTE: THE CIVIL
 PLAN APPEARS TO SHOW A DIFFERENT CANOPY THAN THE SITE
 AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (NO SIDEWALK OVERHANG OF
 SIDEWALK ALONG RELOCATED COCOANUT LANE).
  
 5) SEPARATE PERMITS, WITH PLANS, ARE REQUIRED FOR:
  
 A. LANDSCAPE
 B. BICYCLE RACK
 C. NEW FENCES AND GATES.
 D. EXTERIOR SIGNAGE
 E. FLAG POLE
 F. SITE LIGHTING
 G. ARBOR STRUCTURE
 H. SECURITY KIOSK
 I. FABRIC CANOPIES
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
 [email protected]
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2016-12-06 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2016-12-06 Time 09:40 Rev Time 4.00
Received By eschneid Date 2016-12-06 Time 09:40 Sent To  
Notes
2016-12-06 09:40:50FAILED
  
 1) ZONING WILL NOT APPROVE THIS PERMIT UNTIL THE PLAT
 FOR THE REALIGNMENT OF COCOANUT AND TUXEDO LANES IS
 RECORDED. THIS PERMIT SHOWS BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
 WITHIN WHAT IS CURRENTLY CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 2) THE SURVEY PROVIDED WITH THE PERMIT IS NO LONGER
 ACCURATE BASED ON THE RECENT ROADWAY REALIGNMENT, THE
 BUILDING DEMOLITION, AND THE INSTALLATION OF THE
 PARKING LOT AND FLAGLER DRIVE WALL. PROVIDE TWO COPIES
 OF AN UPDATED SURVEY SHOWING THE RELOCATED EASEMENTS
 AND ALL FEATURES IN THE AREA OF WORK. THE SURVEY NEEDS
 TO BE REVISED AFTER THE PLAT IS RECORDED SO THAT IT IS
 AN ACCURATE DEPICTION OF THE SITE CONDITIONS.
  
 3) REMOVE BUILDING #3 FROM THE CIVIL PLAN AS IT IS NOT
 BEING CONSTRUCTED AS PART OF THIS PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 4) PROVIDE THE SETBACK DIMENSIONS FOR THE PROPOSED
 BUILDING, KIOSK, STAIRWAY AND CANOPY STRUCTURES ON THE
 PLANS TO THE PROPERTY LINES. THE PROPERTY LINES SHALL
 MATCH THE PROPERTY LINES AFTER THE PLAT IS RECORDED.
 THE SETBACKS SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE CLOSEST PORTION
 OF THE BUILDING TO THE PROPERTY LINES AND SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLANS. PLEASE NOTE
 THAT THE CURRENT MINOR AMENDMENT DOES NOT CORRECTLY
 SHOW THE SETBACK TABLE ON THE COTLEUR HEARING MASTER
 PLAN.
  
 5) IT APPEARS THAT THE WALKWAY CANOPY OVERHANGS THE NEW
 COCOANUT LANE RIGHT-OF-WAY, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED.
 THIS WILL BE VERIFIED ONCE THE SURVEY IS REVISED BASED
 ON THE RECORDATION OF THE PLAT WHICH INCLUDES THE
 REALIGNMENT OF COCOANUT AND TUXEDO LANES.
  
 6) PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY ALL OF THE WINDOWS DO NOT HAVE
 THE HORIZONTAL SUN CONTROL (ALL ELEVATIONS). THE NEW
 BUILDING WAS TO MIMIC THE EXISTING BUILDING IN THIS
 REGARD.
  
 7) REMOVE PLANS FOR THE GYMNASIUM BUILDING FROM THIS
 SUBMITTAL AS THEY ARE NOT PART OF THIS PERMIT
 APPLICATION.
  
 8) PROVIDE DETAILS TO VERIFY THAT THE NEW ROOFTOP
 CHILLER IS SCREENED FROM VIEW FROM THE SOUTH AND WEST.
 THE SECTION SHEETS DO NOT SEEM TO SHOW THE WALL HIGH
 ENOUGH, ESPECIALLY FROM THE WEST WHERE THERE IS A GRADE
 DIFFERENTIAL TOWARD SOUTH OLIVE AVENUE.
  
 9) SEPARATE PERMITS, WITH PLANS, ARE REQUIRED FOR:
  
 A. LANDSCAPE
 B. BICYCLE RACK
 C. NEW FENCES AND GATES.
 D. SIGNAGE
 E. FLAG POLE
 F. SITE LIGHTING
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2016-01-25 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2016-01-25 Time 08:57 Rev Time 4.00
Received By eschneid Date 2016-01-25 Time 08:57 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-25 10:49:06FAILED
  
 PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSE.
  
 1) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE
 DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS FROM RESOLUTION NO. 144-11
 LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN SATISFIED:
  
 A. GRANT TO THE CITY A TEMPORARY ACCESS EASEMENT FOR
 USE OF TUXEDO AND COCONUT LANES UNTIL THE ROADS ARE
 RELOCATED; EXISTING UTILITIES UNTIL RELOCATED; AND
 EXISTING DRAINAGE UNTIL RELOCATED, IN FORM ACCEPTABLE
 TO THE CITY. THIS HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED.
  
 B. GRANT TO THE CITY A DRAINAGE AND FLOWAGE EASEMENT
 FOR ALL ON-SITE DRAINAGE AND FLOWAGE THROUGH THE
 BIOSWALE [OR CURRENT ITERATION]. PBDA SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF ALL ON-SITE DRAINAGE.
 THIS HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED.
  
 E. RECORD A PLAT FOR THE ENTIRE PBDA CAMPUS. PRIOR TO
 RECORDATION, THE PLAT SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW
 THROUGH THE MINOR SUBDIVISION PROCESS TO INCLUDE ALL
 REQUIRED EASEMENTS. THE RELOCATION AND/OR ABANDONMENT
 OF EASEMENTS WILL REQUIRE APPLICATIONS TO BE FILED WITH
 THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION. THIS HAS NOT BEEN
 COMPLETED.
  
 H. THE PBDA SHALL PROVIDE A TEMPORARY ACCESS, UTILITY
 AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT, APPROVED BY THE ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, IN FAVOR OF THE CITY AT THE TIME
 OF THE RECORDATION OF THE PBDA PLAT. THIS HAS NOT BEEN
 COMPLETED.
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE
 FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OUTLINED IN RESOLUTION NO. 341-10
 HAVE BEEN MET:
  
 A. PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL RECORD A PLAT FOR THE
 ENTIRE CAMPUS. PRIOR TO RECORDATION, THE PALM BEACH DAY
 ACADEMY SHALL MAKE APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING AND
 ZONING DEPARTMENT FOR THE REVIEW OF THE PLAT THROUGH
 THE MINOR SUBDIVISION PROCESS WITH FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
 THROUGH AN APPLICATION SUBMITTED TO THE CITY'S
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. ALL REQUIRED EASEMENTS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED EITHER BY PLAT OR SEPARATE
 INSTRUMENT, IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY. THIS HAS
 NOT BEEN COMPLETED.
  
 B. IN THE EVENT THE UTILITIES ARE RELOCATED TO ANOTHER
 AREA OF THE PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY CAMPUS, THE PALM
 BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL GRANT TO THE CITY A UTILITY
 EASEMENT OVER, UNDER AND THROUGH SUCH AREA OF THE
 CAMPUS. THIS HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED.
  
 C. PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL SUBMIT AN APPLICATION
 TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR THE
 REALIGNMENT OF THE TUXEDO AND COCOANUT LANES AND THE
 RELOCATION OF ANY CITY UTILITIES. AFTER THE ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT APPROVAL, THE PALM BEACH DAY
 ACADEMY SHALL, AT ITS OWN COST AND EXPENSE, REALIGN THE
 INTERSECTION OF TUXEDO AND COCOANUT LANES AND RELOCATE
 ANY AND ALL UTILITY LINES LOCATED WITHIN THE ABANDONED
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL POST A
 BOND TO THE CITY IN THE AGREED AMOUNT OF THE ESTIMATED
 COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RELOCATION OF THE ROADWAY AND
 THE UTILITY LINES PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF THE PALM
 BEACH DAY ACADEMY PLAT. THIS HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED.
  
 D. PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL PROVIDE TO THE CITY A
 TEMPORARY ACCESS EASEMENT, AND TEMPORARY UTILITIES AND
 DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OVER AND ACROSS THE ABANDONED
 RIGHT-OF-WAY, IN FORM APPROVED BY THE OFFICE OF THE
 CITY ATTORNEY, AT THE TIME OF THE RECORDATION OF THE
 PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY PLAT. THIS HAS NOT BEEN
 COMPLETED.
  
 E. PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL TENDER AND DELIVER
 $11,000 TO THE CITY AS COMPENSATION FOR THE VALUE OF
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS.
 THIS HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED.
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE
 FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OUTLINED IN RESOLUTION NO. 342-10
 HAVE BEEN MET:
  
 A. PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL RECORD A PLAT FOR THE
 ENTIRE CAMPUS. PRIOR TO RECORDATION, THE PALM BEACH DAY
 ACADEMY SHALL MAKE APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING AND
 ZONING DEPARTMENT FOR THE REVIEW OF THE PLAT THROUGH
 THE MINOR SUBDIVISION PROCESS WITH FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
 THROUGH AN APPLICATION SUBMITTED TO THE CITY'S
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. ALL REQUIRED EASEMENTS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED EITHER BY PLAT OR SEPARATE
 INSTRUMENT, IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY. THIS HAS
 NOT BEEN COMPLETED.
  
 B. PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL SUBMIT AN APPLICATION
 TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR THE
 REALIGNMENT OF THE TUXEDO AND COCOANUT LANES AND THE
 RELOCATION OF ANY CITY UTILITIES. AFTER THE ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT APPROVAL, THE PALM BEACH DAY
 ACADEMY SHALL, AT ITS OWN COST AND EXPENSE, REALIGN THE
 INTERSECTION OF TUXEDO AND COCOANUT LANES AND RELOCATE
 ANY AND ALL UTILITY LINES LOCATED WITHIN THE ABANDONED
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL POST A
 BOND TO THE CITY IN THE AGREED AMOUNT OF THE ESTIMATED
 COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RELOCATION OF THE ROADWAY AND
 THE UTILITY LINES PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF THE PALM
 BEACH DAY ACADEMY PLAT. THIS HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED.
  
 C. IN THE EVENT THE UTILITIES ARE RELOCATED TO ANOTHER
 AREA OF THE PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY CAMPUS, THE PALM
 BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL GRANT TO THE CITY A UTILITY
 EASEMENT OVER, UNDER AND THROUGH SUCH AREA OF THE
 CAMPUS. THIS HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED.
  
 D. PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL PROVIDE TO THE CITY
 TEMPORARY UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OVER AND
 ACROSS THE ABANDONED RIGHT-OF-WAY, IN FORM APPROVED BY
 THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, AT THE TIME OF THE
 RECORDATION OF THE PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY PLAT. THIS
 HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED.
  
 E. PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL TENDER AND DELIVER
 $24,000 TO THE CITY AS COMPENSATION FOR THE VALUE OF
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS.
 THIS HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED.
  
 4) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SURVEY INCLUDED WITH THE PERMIT
 APPLICATION IS FROM 2010 AND DOES NOT REFLECT THE
 CURRENT CONDITIONS, ESPECIALLY ON THE WESTERN HALF OF
 THE SITE. AN ACCURATE RECENT SURVEY IS REQUIRED.
  
 5) REPEAT COMMENT: THE INTERIM SITE LAYOUT REQUIRES A
 MINIMUM OF 61 PARKING SPACES. THE CURRENTLY SUBMITTED
 INTERIM PLAN ONLY SHOWS 59 SPACES. THE TWO SPACES ON
 THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING ARE BUS PARKING SPACES,
 NOT REGULAR PARKING SPACES.
  
 6) REPEAT COMMENT: SHEET G1.1 DOES NOT MATCH THE CIVIL
 PLANS SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE PERMIT APPLICATION OR
 THE PLANS SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE MINOR PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT. ALL PLANS SHALL SHOW CONSISTENT
 CONDITIONS AND BE APPROVED THROUGH THE MINOR PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT PROCESS.
  
 7) REPEAT COMMENT: ON SHEET A4.1, THE MECHANICAL SCREEN
 WALL ELEVATION IS SHOWN AT 130 FEET, YET THE TOP OF THE
 WALL IS ALSO 130 FEET. PLEASE CORRECT THE ELEVATION.
  
 8) A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THE WORK
 WITHIN FLAGLER DRIVE, TUXEDO LANE AND COCOANUT LANE.
  
 9) SEPARATE PERMITS, WITH PLANS, WILL BE REQUIRED FOR:
  
 A. LANDSCAPE
 B. AWNINGS AND CANOPIES
 C. SIGNS
 D. PARKING AND SIDEWALKS
 E. BICYCLE RACKS, BENCHES, FLAGPOLE, TRASH CANS AND
 OTHER SITE AMENITIES
 F. FENCES, WALLS AND GATES (TO INCLUDE THE SITE WALLS
 AND RETAINING WALLS) - PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF IS
 UNCLEAR WHERE THE SPECIFIC WALLS AND FENCES WILL BE
 LOCATED BASED ON LACK OF DETAIL ON THE SITE PLANS. THE
 PLANS SHALL CLEARLY SHOW THE SETBACKS OF THE
 WALLS/FENCES TO VERIFY THAT THEY DO NOT EXCEED THE
 MAXIMUM HEIGHT.
 G. SITE LIGHTING
 H. THE PUBLIC ARE FIGURES ON TOP OF THE CANOPY.
  
 10) PLEASE REMEMBER THAT DURING CONSTRUCTION THE
 FOLLOWING SITE SECURITY ITEMS SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED:
  
 I. THE APPLICANT, AFTER SITE CLEARING AND PLACEMENT OF
 CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS, SHALL INSTITUTE SECURITY
 MEASURES TO REDUCE OR ELIMINATE OPPORTUNITIES FOR
 THEFT. THE MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE
 LIMITED TO, TEMPORARY LIGHTING, SECURITY PERSONNEL,
 VEHICLE BARRIERS, CONSTRUCTION/VISITOR PASS,
 REDUCE/MINIMIZE ENTRY/EXIT POINTS, ENCOURAGE
 SUBCONTRACTORS TO SECURE MACHINERY AND TOOLS AT END OF
 WORK DAY, FENCING WITH SCREENING, AND/OR ANY OTHER
 MEASURE DEEMED APPROPRIATE TO PROVIDE A SAFE AND SECURE
 WORKING ENVIRONMENT.
  
 II. THE SECURITY MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL BE MAINTAINED
 THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROJECT.
 NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN SHALL RESULT IN A
 STOP-WORK ORDER FOR THE ENTIRE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.
  
 III. "NO TRESPASSING" SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED EVERY 500
 FEET AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.
  
 11) PRIOR TO C.O. FOR THE ACADEMIC BUILDING, ANY
 OFF-SITE SIGNAGE OR TRAFFIC CONTROL AIDES SHALL BE
 INSTALLED BY THE PBDA.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-10-27 Cont ID  
Sent By ESchneid Date 2015-10-27 Time 14:54 Rev Time 4.00
Received By eschneid Date 2015-10-23 Time 13:52 Sent To  
Notes
2015-10-27 14:56:22FAILED
  
 1) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE
 DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS FROM RESOLUTION NO. 144-11
 LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN SATISFIED:
  
 A. GRANT TO THE CITY A TEMPORARY ACCESS EASEMENT FOR
 USE OF TUXEDO AND COCONUT LANES UNTIL THE ROADS ARE
 RELOCATED; EXISTING UTILITIES UNTIL RELOCATED; AND
 EXISTING DRAINAGE UNTIL RELOCATED, IN FORM ACCEPTABLE
 TO THE CITY. THIS HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED.
  
 B. GRANT TO THE CITY A DRAINAGE AND FLOWAGE EASEMENT
 FOR ALL ON-SITE DRAINAGE AND FLOWAGE THROUGH THE
 BIOSWALE [OR CURRENT ITERATION]. PBDA SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF ALL ON-SITE DRAINAGE.
 THIS HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED.
  
 E. RECORD A PLAT FOR THE ENTIRE PBDA CAMPUS. PRIOR TO
 RECORDATION, THE PLAT SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW
 THROUGH THE MINOR SUBDIVISION PROCESS TO INCLUDE ALL
 REQUIRED EASEMENTS. THE RELOCATION AND/OR ABANDONMENT
 OF EASEMENTS WILL REQUIRE APPLICATIONS TO BE FILED WITH
 THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION. THIS HAS NOT BEEN
 COMPLETED.
  
 H. THE PBDA SHALL PROVIDE A TEMPORARY ACCESS, UTILITY
 AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT, APPROVED BY THE ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, IN FAVOR OF THE CITY AT THE TIME
 OF THE RECORDATION OF THE PBDA PLAT. THIS HAS NOT BEEN
 COMPLETED.
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE
 FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OUTLINED IN RESOLUTION NO. 341-10
 HAVE BEEN MET:
  
 A. PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL RECORD A PLAT FOR THE
 ENTIRE CAMPUS. PRIOR TO RECORDATION, THE PALM BEACH DAY
 ACADEMY SHALL MAKE APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING AND
 ZONING DEPARTMENT FOR THE REVIEW OF THE PLAT THROUGH
 THE MINOR SUBDIVISION PROCESS WITH FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
 THROUGH AN APPLICATION SUBMITTED TO THE CITY'S
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. ALL REQUIRED EASEMENTS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED EITHER BY PLAT OR SEPARATE
 INSTRUMENT, IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY. THIS HAS
 NOT BEEN COMPLETED.
  
 B. IN THE EVENT THE UTILITIES ARE RELOCATED TO ANOTHER
 AREA OF THE PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY CAMPUS, THE PALM
 BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL GRANT TO THE CITY A UTILITY
 EASEMENT OVER, UNDER AND THROUGH SUCH AREA OF THE
 CAMPUS. THIS HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED.
  
 C. PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL SUBMIT AN APPLICATION
 TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR THE
 REALIGNMENT OF THE TUXEDO AND COCOANUT LANES AND THE
 RELOCATION OF ANY CITY UTILITIES. AFTER THE ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT APPROVAL, THE PALM BEACH DAY
 ACADEMY SHALL, AT ITS OWN COST AND EXPENSE, REALIGN THE
 INTERSECTION OF TUXEDO AND COCOANUT LANES AND RELOCATE
 ANY AND ALL UTILITY LINES LOCATED WITHIN THE ABANDONED
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL POST A
 BOND TO THE CITY IN THE AGREED AMOUNT OF THE ESTIMATED
 COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RELOCATION OF THE ROADWAY AND
 THE UTILITY LINES PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF THE PALM
 BEACH DAY ACADEMY PLAT. THIS HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED.
  
 D. PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL PROVIDE TO THE CITY A
 TEMPORARY ACCESS EASEMENT, AND TEMPORARY UTILITIES AND
 DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OVER AND ACROSS THE ABANDONED
 RIGHT-OF-WAY, IN FORM APPROVED BY THE OFFICE OF THE
 CITY ATTORNEY, AT THE TIME OF THE RECORDATION OF THE
 PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY PLAT. THIS HAS NOT BEEN
 COMPLETED.
  
 E. PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL TENDER AND DELIVER
 $11,000 TO THE CITY AS COMPENSATION FOR THE VALUE OF
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS.
 THIS HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED.
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE
 FOLLOWING CONDITIONS OUTLINED IN RESOLUTION NO. 342-10
 HAVE BEEN MET:
  
 A. PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL RECORD A PLAT FOR THE
 ENTIRE CAMPUS. PRIOR TO RECORDATION, THE PALM BEACH DAY
 ACADEMY SHALL MAKE APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING AND
 ZONING DEPARTMENT FOR THE REVIEW OF THE PLAT THROUGH
 THE MINOR SUBDIVISION PROCESS WITH FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
 THROUGH AN APPLICATION SUBMITTED TO THE CITY'S
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. ALL REQUIRED EASEMENTS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED EITHER BY PLAT OR SEPARATE
 INSTRUMENT, IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY. THIS HAS
 NOT BEEN COMPLETED.
  
 B. PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL SUBMIT AN APPLICATION
 TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR THE
 REALIGNMENT OF THE TUXEDO AND COCOANUT LANES AND THE
 RELOCATION OF ANY CITY UTILITIES. AFTER THE ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT APPROVAL, THE PALM BEACH DAY
 ACADEMY SHALL, AT ITS OWN COST AND EXPENSE, REALIGN THE
 INTERSECTION OF TUXEDO AND COCOANUT LANES AND RELOCATE
 ANY AND ALL UTILITY LINES LOCATED WITHIN THE ABANDONED
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL POST A
 BOND TO THE CITY IN THE AGREED AMOUNT OF THE ESTIMATED
 COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RELOCATION OF THE ROADWAY AND
 THE UTILITY LINES PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF THE PALM
 BEACH DAY ACADEMY PLAT. THIS HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED.
  
 C. IN THE EVENT THE UTILITIES ARE RELOCATED TO ANOTHER
 AREA OF THE PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY CAMPUS, THE PALM
 BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL GRANT TO THE CITY A UTILITY
 EASEMENT OVER, UNDER AND THROUGH SUCH AREA OF THE
 CAMPUS. THIS HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED.
  
 D. PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL PROVIDE TO THE CITY
 TEMPORARY UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OVER AND
 ACROSS THE ABANDONED RIGHT-OF-WAY, IN FORM APPROVED BY
 THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, AT THE TIME OF THE
 RECORDATION OF THE PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY PLAT. THIS
 HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED.
  
 E. PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL TENDER AND DELIVER
 $24,000 TO THE CITY AS COMPENSATION FOR THE VALUE OF
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS.
 THIS HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED.
  
 4) NEW COMMENT: THE SURVEY INCLUDED WITH THE PERMIT
 APPLICATION IS FROM 2010 AND DOES NOT REFLECT THE
 CURRENT CONDITIONS, ESPECIALLY ON THE WESTERN HALF OF
 THE SITE. AN ACCURATE RECENT SURVEY IS REQUIRED.
  
 5) NEW COMMENT: PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE SITE REQUIRES
 A MINIMUM OF 61 PARKING SPACES BOTH IN THE INTERIM AND
 FINAL LAYOUT.
  
 6) NEW COMMENT: THE BASE SITE DRAWINGS FOR THE SITE DO
 NOT MATCH THE PLANS SUBMITTED AS PART OF THE MINOR SITE
 PLAN AMENDMENT. THE ZONING STAFF WILL NOT APPROVE THIS
 PERMIT UNTIL THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS ARE APPROVED.
 THE PERMIT DRAWINGS SHALL REFLECT THE APPROVED
 CONDITIONS.
  
 7) NEW COMMENT: ON SHEET A3.1, THE FINISHED FLOOR
 ELEVATION TAG FOR THE ACADEMIC BUILDING'S SOUTH
 ELEVATION IS SHOWN ALMOST THREE (3) FEET ABOVE THE
 GRADE.
  
 8) NEW COMMENT: ON SHEETS A3.1 AND SHEET A4.1, THE
 MECHANICAL SCREEN WALL ELEVATION IS SHOWN AT 130 FEET,
 YET THE TOP OF THE WALL IS ALSO 130 FEET. PLEASE
 CORRECT THE ELEVATIONS.
  
 9) NEW COMMENT: THE ORIGINAL, COMMUNITY ENDORSED
 ELEVATIONS INCLUDED A TILE VENEER AND HORIZONTAL SUN
 CONTROL AND LOUVER ELEMENTS ON THE WINDOWS. THE LOUVERS
 MIMICKED THOSE ON THE EXISTING ACADEMIC BUILDING, TYING
 THEM TOGETHER AS WELL AS PROVIDING SOME RELATIONSHIP TO
 THE ROOFTOP MECHANICAL SCREEN WALL. THESE ELEMENTS NEED
 TO BE REPLACED, OR THE PROJECT NEEDS TO BE RE-PRESENTED
 TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD IN ACCORDANCE WITH RES. NO. 144-11.
  
 10) A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THE WORK
 WITHIN FLAGLER DRIVE, TUXEDO LANE AND COCOANUT LANE.
  
 11) SEPARATE PERMITS, WITH PLANS, WILL BE REQUIRED FOR:
  
 A. LANDSCAPE
 B. AWNINGS AND CANOPIES
 C. SIGNS
 D. PARKING AND SIDEWALKS
 E. BICYCLE RACKS, BENCHES, FLAGPOLE, TRASH CANS AND
 OTHER SITE AMENITIES
 F. FENCES, WALLS AND GATES ? PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF IS
 UNCLEAR WHERE THE SPECIFIC WALLS AND FENCES WILL BE
 LOCATED BASED ON LACK OF DETAIL ON THE SITE PLANS. THE
 PLANS SHALL CLEARLY SHOW THE SETBACKS OF THE
 WALLS/FENCES TO VERIFY THAT THEY DO NOT EXCEED THE
 MAXIMUM HEIGHT.
 G. SITE LIGHTING
  
 12) PLEASE REMEMBER THAT DURING CONSTRUCTION THE
 FOLLOWING SITE SECURITY ITEMS SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED:
  
 I. THE APPLICANT, AFTER SITE CLEARING AND PLACEMENT OF
 CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS, SHALL INSTITUTE SECURITY
 MEASURES TO REDUCE OR ELIMINATE OPPORTUNITIES FOR
 THEFT. THE MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE
 LIMITED TO, TEMPORARY LIGHTING, SECURITY PERSONNEL,
 VEHICLE BARRIERS, CONSTRUCTION/VISITOR PASS,
 REDUCE/MINIMIZE ENTRY/EXIT POINTS, ENCOURAGE
 SUBCONTRACTORS TO SECURE MACHINERY AND TOOLS AT END OF
 WORK DAY, FENCING WITH SCREENING, AND/OR ANY OTHER
 MEASURE DEEMED APPROPRIATE TO PROVIDE A SAFE AND SECURE
 WORKING ENVIRONMENT.
  
 II. THE SECURITY MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL BE MAINTAINED
 THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROJECT.
 NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN SHALL RESULT IN A
 STOP-WORK ORDER FOR THE ENTIRE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.
  
 III. "NO TRESPASSING" SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED EVERY 500
 FEET AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.
  
 13) PRIOR TO C.O. FOR THE ACADEMIC BUILDING, ANY
 OFF-SITE SIGNAGE OR TRAFFIC CONTROL AIDES SHALL BE
 INSTALLED BY THE PBDA.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-04-06 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2015-04-06 Time 17:01 Rev Time 4.00
Received By eschneid Date 2015-04-03 Time 11:20 Sent To  
Notes
2015-04-06 17:05:58FAILED
  
 1) THE PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY COMMUNITY SERVICE PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT IS GOVERNED BY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
 STATED IN RESOLUTION NO. 144-11. THE ABANDONMENT AND
 REDEDICATION OF THE INTERSECTION OF TUXEDO AND COCOANUT
 LANES AND THE ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF ORANGE COURT
 ARE GOVERNED BY RESOLUTION NOS. 341-10 AND 342-10,
 RESPECTIVELY.
  
 2) PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS
 FROM RESOLUTION NO. 144-11 LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN
 SATISFIED:
  
 A. GRANT TO THE CITY A TEMPORARY ACCESS EASEMENT FOR
 USE OF TUXEDO AND COCONUT LANES UNTIL THE ROADS ARE
 RELOCATED; EXISTING UTILITIES UNTIL RELOCATED; AND
 EXISTING DRAINAGE UNTIL RELOCATED, IN FORM ACCEPTABLE
 TO THE CITY.
  
 B. GRANT TO THE CITY A DRAINAGE AND FLOWAGE EASEMENT
 FOR ALL ON-SITE DRAINAGE AND FLOWAGE THROUGH THE
 BIOSWALE [OR CURRENT ITERATION]. PBDA SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF ALL ON-SITE DRAINAGE.
  
 C. PROVIDE THE PLANNING DIVISION WITH A TRAFFIC CONTROL
 PLAN, APPROVED BY THE CITY'S TRAFFIC ENGINEER, WHICH
 INCLUDES THE LOCATIONS OF THE TRAFFIC DIRECTING
 PERSONNEL AND A WRITTEN NARRATIVE HOW THE TRAFFIC
 CONTROL OPERATIONS WILL FUNCTION FOR THE PICK-UP AND
 DROP-OFF TIMES. THE COST TO CONSTRUCT, INSTALL AND
 MAINTAIN ANY OFF-SITE SIGNAGE OR TRAFFIC CONTROL AIDES
 SHALL BE BORNE BY THE PBDA.
  
 D. PREPARE A CONSTRUCTION SITE SECURITY AND MANAGEMENT
 PLAN FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY'S POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME
 PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (CPTED)
 OFFICIAL.
  
 I. THE APPLICANT, AFTER SITE CLEARING AND PLACEMENT OF
 CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS, SHALL INSTITUTE SECURITY
 MEASURES TO REDUCE OR ELIMINATE OPPORTUNITIES FOR
 THEFT. THE MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE
 LIMITED TO, TEMPORARY LIGHTING, SECURITY PERSONNEL,
 VEHICLE BARRIERS, CONSTRUCTION/VISITOR PASS,
 REDUCE/MINIMIZE ENTRY/EXIT POINTS, ENCOURAGE
 SUBCONTRACTORS TO SECURE MACHINERY AND TOOLS AT END OF
 WORK DAY, FENCING WITH SCREENING, AND/OR ANY OTHER
 MEASURE DEEMED APPROPRIATE TO PROVIDE A SAFE AND SECURE
 WORKING ENVIRONMENT.
  
 II. THE SECURITY MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL BE MAINTAINED
 THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROJECT.
 NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN SHALL RESULT IN A
 STOP-WORK ORDER FOR THE ENTIRE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.
  
 III. "NO TRESPASSING" SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED EVERY 500
 FEET AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.
  
 E. RECORD A PLAT FOR THE ENTIRE PBDA CAMPUS. PRIOR TO
 RECORDATION, THE PLAT SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW
 THROUGH THE MINOR SUBDIVISION PROCESS TO INCLUDE ALL
 REQUIRED EASEMENTS. THE RELOCATION AND/OR ABANDONMENT
 OF EASEMENTS WILL REQUIRE APPLICATIONS TO BE FILED WITH
 THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION.
  
 F. SUBMIT COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY PLANS TO THE FIRE
 DEPARTMENT FOR THEIR APPROVAL.
  
 G. SUBMIT TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION SIGNED
 AND SEALED ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS TO DEMONSTRATE THAT
 WATER QUALITY IS BEING MAINTAINED FOR THE SITE AND THAT
 POST DEVELOPMENT OFF-SITE DISCHARGE DOES NOT EXCEED THE
 PREDEVELOPMENT OFF-SITE DISCHARGE.
  
 H. THE PBDA SHALL PROVIDE A TEMPORARY ACCESS, UTILITY
 AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT, APPROVED BY THE ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, IN FAVOR OF THE CITY AT THE TIME
 OF THE RECORDATION OF THE PBDA PLAT.
  
 3) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TPS APPROVAL LETTER FOR THE
 PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY CSPD, NO BUILDING PERMIT FOR NEW
 DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY CSPD WILL
 BE ISSUED AFTER THE BUILD-OUT DATE OF DECEMBER 31,
 2014, UNLESS THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC DIVISION
 ISSUES AN AMENDED TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER WITH A NEW
 BUILD-OUT DATE. IN THE EVENT THAT THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
 TRAFFIC DIVISION ISSUES A REVISED TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY
 LETTER, THEN THE BUILD-OUT DATE IN THIS CONDITION SHALL
 BE AMENDED THROUGH THE MINOR AMENDMENT PROCESS.
  
 4) PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS
 OUTLINED IN RESOLUTION NO. 341-10 HAVE BEEN MET:
  
 A. PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL RECORD A PLAT FOR THE
 ENTIRE CAMPUS. PRIOR TO RECORDATION, THE PALM BEACH DAY
 ACADEMY SHALL MAKE APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING AND
 ZONING DEPARTMENT FOR THE REVIEW OF THE PLAT THROUGH
 THE MINOR SUBDIVISION PROCESS WITH FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
 THROUGH AN APPLICATION SUBMITTED TO THE CITY'S
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. ALL REQUIRED EASEMENTS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED EITHER BY PLAT OR SEPARATE
 INSTRUMENT, IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY.
  
 B. IN THE EVENT THE UTILITIES ARE RELOCATED TO ANOTHER
 AREA OF THE PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY CAMPUS, THE PALM
 BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL GRANT TO THE CITY A UTILITY
 EASEMENT OVER, UNDER AND THROUGH SUCH AREA OF THE
 CAMPUS.
  
 C. PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL SUBMIT AN APPLICATION
 TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR THE
 REALIGNMENT OF THE TUXEDO AND COCOANUT LANES AND THE
 RELOCATION OF ANY CITY UTILITIES. AFTER THE ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT APPROVAL, THE PALM BEACH DAY
 ACADEMY SHALL, AT ITS OWN COST AND EXPENSE, REALIGN THE
 INTERSECTION OF TUXEDO AND COCOANUT LANES AND RELOCATE
 ANY AND ALL UTILITY LINES LOCATED WITHIN THE ABANDONED
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL POST A
 BOND TO THE CITY IN THE AGREED AMOUNT OF THE ESTIMATED
 COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RELOCATION OF THE ROADWAY AND
 THE UTILITY LINES PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF THE PALM
 BEACH DAY ACADEMY PLAT.
  
 D. PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL PROVIDE TO THE CITY A
 TEMPORARY ACCESS EASEMENT, AND TEMPORARY UTILITIES AND
 DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OVER AND ACROSS THE ABANDONED
 RIGHT-OF-WAY, IN FORM APPROVED BY THE OFFICE OF THE
 CITY ATTORNEY, AT THE TIME OF THE RECORDATION OF THE
 PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY PLAT.
  
 E. PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL TENDER AND DELIVER
 $11,000 TO THE CITY AS COMPENSATION FOR THE VALUE OF
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS.
  
 5) PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS
 OUTLINED IN RESOLUTION NO. 342-10 HAVE BEEN MET:
  
 A. PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL RECORD A PLAT FOR THE
 ENTIRE CAMPUS. PRIOR TO RECORDATION, THE PALM BEACH DAY
 ACADEMY SHALL MAKE APPLICATION TO THE PLANNING AND
 ZONING DEPARTMENT FOR THE REVIEW OF THE PLAT THROUGH
 THE MINOR SUBDIVISION PROCESS WITH FINAL PLAT APPROVAL
 THROUGH AN APPLICATION SUBMITTED TO THE CITY'S
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. ALL REQUIRED EASEMENTS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED EITHER BY PLAT OR SEPARATE
 INSTRUMENT, IN A FORM ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY.
  
 B. PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL SUBMIT AN APPLICATION
 TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT FOR THE
 REALIGNMENT OF THE TUXEDO AND COCOANUT LANES AND THE
 RELOCATION OF ANY CITY UTILITIES. AFTER THE ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT APPROVAL, THE PALM BEACH DAY
 ACADEMY SHALL, AT ITS OWN COST AND EXPENSE, REALIGN THE
 INTERSECTION OF TUXEDO AND COCOANUT LANES AND RELOCATE
 ANY AND ALL UTILITY LINES LOCATED WITHIN THE ABANDONED
 RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL POST A
 BOND TO THE CITY IN THE AGREED AMOUNT OF THE ESTIMATED
 COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RELOCATION OF THE ROADWAY AND
 THE UTILITY LINES PRIOR TO THE RECORDATION OF THE PALM
 BEACH DAY ACADEMY PLAT.
  
 C. IN THE EVENT THE UTILITIES ARE RELOCATED TO ANOTHER
 AREA OF THE PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY CAMPUS, THE PALM
 BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL GRANT TO THE CITY A UTILITY
 EASEMENT OVER, UNDER AND THROUGH SUCH AREA OF THE
 CAMPUS.
  
 D. PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL PROVIDE TO THE CITY
 TEMPORARY UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OVER AND
 ACROSS THE ABANDONED RIGHT-OF-WAY, IN FORM APPROVED BY
 THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, AT THE TIME OF THE
 RECORDATION OF THE PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY PLAT.
  
 E. PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY SHALL TENDER AND DELIVER
 $24,000 TO THE CITY AS COMPENSATION FOR THE VALUE OF
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS.
  
 6) ZONING STAFF UNDERSTANDS THAT THERE WILL BE CHANGES
 TO THE BUILDING AND SITE SUBMITTED IN THE NEAR FUTURE.
 IN LIGHT OF THE CONDITIONS LISTED ABOVE THAT HAVE NOT
 BEEN ADDRESSED, ZONING STAFF WILL NOT REVIEW THE
 SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS UNTIL THE AMENDMENT HAS BEEN
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED.
  
 7) A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THE WORK
 WITHIN FLAGLER DRIVE, TUXEDO LANE AND COCOANUT LANE.
  
 8) SEPARATE PERMITS, WITH PLANS, WILL BE REQUIRED FOR:
  
 A. LANDSCAPE
 B. AWNINGS AND CANOPIES
 C. SIGNS
 D. PARKING AND SIDEWALKS
 E. BICYCLE RACKS, BENCHES, TRASH CANS AND OTHER SITE
 AMENITIES
 F. FENCES, WALLS AND GATES
 G. SITE LIGHTING
  
 9) THIS BUILDING IS SUBJECT TO THE ARTS IN PUBLIC
 PLACES REQUIREMENTS.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446.
  
2015-03-10 13:48:383/10/15


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved