Plan Review Details - Permit 14110863
Plan Review Stops For Permit 14110863
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2015-05-21 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2015-05-21 Time 12:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2015-05-19 Time 09:50 Sent To  
Notes
2015-05-19 15:57:56MARTIN,
 HERE ARE THE TECHNICAL SHEETS THAT WE WILL NEED TO BE
 PRINTED INTO (3) SETS 11 X 17 INCHES SEE ATTACHMENT
 BELOW.
 I HAVE COPIED ADAM, THAT WE ARE ACCEPTING THE NEW NUCOR
 PLANS WITH ENHANCED FASTENING IN WALL ZONE 5 AND ROOF
 ZONES 2 & 3. THE CITY WILL NEED UPDATED STRUCTURAL
 CALCULATIONS SINCE THE SPANS WERE CHANGED FROM THE
 ORIGINAL REVIEW. WE WILL RELEASE THE PERMIT ON A
 PROVISO WE HAVE UPDATED STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS BEFORE
 THE MAIN STRUCTURE AND SECONDARY SUPPORTS ARE COMPLETED
 AND BEFORE THE STRUCTURAL WALL & ROOF PANELS CAN BE
 STARTED.
  
 JAMES A. WITMER CBO
 SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 TEL: 561-805-6715
 FAX: 561-805-6676
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2015-05-02 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2015-05-02 Time 07:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2015-05-01 Time 10:29 Sent To  
Notes
2015-05-01 14:35:47BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 W. P. B. PERMIT: 14110863
 ADD: 5483 LEEPER DR.
 CONT: ANDERSON MOORE CONSTRUCTION
 TEL: (561) 662-1819
 E-MAIL: RKENNEY @AMCBUILD.COM
  
 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W
 * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION
 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013.
  
 IMPORTANT NOTICE: EFFECTIVE MARCH 30, 2015
 ALL PERMIT APPLICATION PLAN REVIEWS WILL BE PERFORMED
 ELECTRONICALLY
 UPON APPLICATION AND FEE PAYMENT DESIGN DOCUMENTS
 SUBMISSION OPTIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
 1 UPLOAD VIA THE PROJECT DOX PORTAL WITH DIGITAL
 SIGNATURES OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS AS APPLICABLE; USE
 THE REQUIRED NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT
 2 INCLUDE ON A CD IF DESIGN PROFESSIONAL DIGITAL
 SIGNATURES ARE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED; USE THE REQUIRED
 NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT
 3 INCLUDE ON A CD WITH ONE SET OF TRADITIONAL PAPER
 DESIGN DOCUMENTS SIGNED AND SEALED AS REQUIRED; USE THE
 REQUIRED NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT
 4 ONE SET OF TRADITIONAL PAPER DESIGN DOCUMENTS SUBJECT
 TO ADMINISTRATIVE FEES TO DIGITIZE THE DOCUMENTS
 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL BE PROVIDED WHEN IT BECOMES
 AVAILABLE
  
 3RD REVIEW
 DATE: FRIDAY MAY 01/2015
 ACTION: DENIED
  
 1-2 COMPLIED.
  
 3) SEMI-COMPLIED. 3) THE TITLE SHEET LIST THE COMMON
 PATH OF TRAVEL OF 28'-11"/ MAX. PROVIDED (50'). PLEASE
 REFER TO SHEET LS.101 THE MEZZANINE LEVEL FROM THE
 FURTHEST POINT ON THE MEZZANINE TO THE BOTTOM OF THE
 STAIRS A MAXIMUM OF 100 FT. NOTE THIS IS IN A STRAIGHT
 LINE, AS THE CROW FLIES. CHIEF LEDUC AS ASKED FOR A
 LAYOUT OF THE MEZZANINE AREA RACKS OR BENS, WITH
 FURNISHINGS THE TRAVEL DISTANCE WILL DIFFENTLY EXCEED
 THE 100 FT REQUIRING A SECOND EXIT. 1015.2.1 TWO EXITS
 OR EXIT ACCESS DOORWAYS.
  
 4) COMPLIED. SOILS REPORTS SUBMITTED.
  
 5) COMPLIED. RESIDENT INSPECTOR FORMS.
  
 6) A) COMPLIED. SHEET S-3 DOES HAVE THE CORRECT WIND
 DESIGN 170 MPH, EXPOSURE C, BLDG. CAT. II, MEAN ROOM
 HEIGHT OF 34 FT. 8 1/4 INCHES, THE WALL PRESSURES IN
 VASD WALL ZONES 4 & 5, ARE GOOD.
  
 6B) PLEASE NOTE THE 2ND SUBMITTAL FROM NUCOR WITH THE
 CORRECT WIND SPEED OF 170 VULT CONSIST OF SHEETS C1, F1
 & FD1. THE 1ST SUBMITTAL HAD 10 PAGES OF NUCOR PLANSFOR
 THE MEZZANINE AND APPROXIMATELY 5/16 OF AN INCH WORTH
 OF STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR THE BUILDING. THESE PLANS ARE
 MISSING FROM THE NEW 170 MPH PACKAGE.
 DID THE GIRT AND PURLIN LOCATION CHANGE OR ARE THE (2)
 PACKAGES TO BE RECONFIGURED INTO ONE PACKAGE? IS
 ANDERSON-MOORE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RE-ORGANIZEING THIS
 PAPERWORK? FOR THE REMAINDER OF THIS REVIEW I'M GOING
 TO USE THE REMAINDER OF THE 180 MPH FOR GIRT AND PURLIN
 SPACING TO COMPARE PRESSURES AND SPACING FOR CODE
 COMPLIANCE. 107.2.1.3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS
 REQUIRED.
  
 6C) NUCOR WALL PRODUCT APPROVAL FLORIDA REPORT FL
 2686-R3 REVERSE CLASSIC PANEL, PLEASE NOTE THERE ARE
 (2) STRENGTH OF PANELS WITHIN THIS REPORT BOTH BEING 26
 GAUGE METAL PANELS. PLEASE IDENTIFY IF THE 50 KSI OR
 THE 80 KSI ARE TO BE INSTALLED ON THIS PROJECT, THE
 PRESURES ARE DIFFERENT FOR THE SAME SPANS. FOR THE
 INTERIOR WALL ZONE 4, FOR (4) OR MORE SPANS @ 4 FT.
 (BASED ON THE 180 MPH GIRT SPACING SHEETP3 OF 05) THE
 REQIURED PRESSURE OF 44.76 VASD WILL WORK ON EITHER
 CHART, BUT IN WALL ZONE 5 THE END ZONE, WITH THE GIRTS
 SPACED 4 FT. O.C. THE REQUIRED PRESSURE OF 55.02
 NEITHER CHART MEETS THE REQUIRED PRESSURES, IN WALL
 ZONE 5 THE GIRTS WILL NEED TO BE CLOSER TOGETHER TO
 ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED PRESSURE OF 55.02 VASD AS ALLOWED
 BY THE PRODUCT LIMITATIONS. THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR
 THE REDUCED SUPPORT SPACING MAY BE COMPUTED USING
 RATIONAL ANALYSIS PREPARED BY A FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL
 ENGINEER OR BASED ON NUCOR'S LOAD SPAN TABLE.
  
 6D) NUCOR ROOF PANEL PRODUCT APPROVAL FL4891-R-6
 CLASSIC PANEL HAS THE SAME (2) STRENGTH METALS, A 50KSI
 & 80 KSI. PLEASE IDENTIFY WHICH PRODUCT IS GOING TO BE
 INSTALLED ON THIS PROJECT. THE PRODUCT APPROVAL DOES
 INDICATE THE 50 KSI STEEL HAS TO BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS.
 IT WOULD APPEAR IF THIS PRODUCT IS TO BE INSTALLED THE
 ENGINEER OF RECORD WILL NEED TO BE INVOLVED WITH THE
 DESIGN. THE 80 KSI PRODUCT STATES THAT WITH SUPPORTING
 PURLINS WITH SPACING OF 60.187 INCHES O. C. THE
 PRESSURES ARE GOOD FOR 52.5. WITHIN THIS PRODUCT
 APPROVALS THERE ARE NO SPAN TABLES PROVIDED. NUCORS ROF
 SPANS BASED ON THE 180 MPH SHEET P3 OF 05 INDICATES
 SPANS OF 4 FT. NUCORS STRUCTURAL DESIGN PAGGE A2 ROOF
 PRESSURES ARE IN VULT. WHEN CONVERTED OVER TO VASD ROOF
 ZONE PRESSURES OF ZONE # 1 -41.26,
 ZONE # 2 -71.83 & ZONE # 3 -106.23. PLEASE PROVIDE
 DOCUMENTATION THAT THIS PRODUCT WILL BE ABLE TO MEET
 THESE PRESSURES.
  
 6E) NUCOR BUILDING SYSTEMS IS AN ENGINEERED SYSTEM. FOR
 THE FINAL SET OF PERMITTABLE DOCUMENTS ORIGINAL SIGHED
 & SEALED DOCUMENTS ARE REQUIRED BY FLORIDA
 ADMINISTRTIVE CODE. 61G15-23.002(2) FL. ADMIN. CODE.
 PLANS SIGNED & SEALED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SHALL
 INCLUDE EITHER THE: NAME, ADDRESS AND LICENSE NUMBER OF
 THE ENGINEER OR, THE NAME AND LICENSE NUMBER OF THE
 ENGINEER AND THE NAME, ADDRESS AND CERTIFICATE OF
 AUTHORIZATION NUMBER OF THE ENGINEERING BUSINESS
 THROUGH WHICH THE ENGINEER IS PRACTICING (471.025 F.S.
 AND 471.023 F.S.).
  
 61G15-23.002(2) FL. ADMIN. CODE. A COVER SHEET OR INDEX
 SHEET FOR ENGINEERING SPECIFICATIONS MAY BE USED AND
 THAT SHEET MUST BE SIGNED IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OF THE
 PRODUCTION & PREPARATION OF EACH SECTION OF THE
 ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION WITH SUFFICIENT INFORMATION
 ON THE COVER SHEET OR INDEX.
  
 61G15-30.003 ENGINEERING DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION.
 ENGINEERS SHALL LEGIBLY INDICATE THEIR NAME AND
 BUSINESS ADDRESS, ON ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS. ENGINEERING
 DOCUMENTS WHICH ARE ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY OR
 CONCEPTUAL USE, SHALL CLEARLY NOTE THE INTENDED PURPOSE
 OF SUCH DOCUMENTS. WHEN ELEMENTS OF THE PROJECT ARE
 SHOWN ON AN ENGINEERING DOCUMENT ONLY FOR INFORMATION
 OR CLARIFICATION AND THE ENGINEER DOES NOT INTEND TO
 ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ELEMENTS, THE ENGINEER
 SHALL CLEARLY NOTE ON THE DOCUMENTS THE EXTENT OF HIS
 RESPONSIBILITY.
 SPECIFIC AUTHORITY 471.033(2), 471.008 FS. LAW
 IMPLEMENTED 471.033(1)(G), 471.025(3) FS. HISTORY NEW
 1-26-93, FORMERLY 21H-30.003.
  
 7A) SEMI-COMPLIED. THE SUBMITTED PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR
 WALL AND ROOF PANELS ARE NOT IDENTIFIED IN THE PRODUCT
 APPROVALS AS TO KSI. THEY ARE NOT IDENTIED BY CIRCLING
 THE PRODUCTS TO BE USED ON THIS PROJECT ON THE NUCOR
 DRAWINGS LABELED C1 OF 1. 2010 WEST PALM BEACH
 AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1,
 ADMINISTRATION 107.2.1 INFORMATION ON CONSTRUCTION
 DOCUMENTS. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE OF
 SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND
 EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT
 WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND
 RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS
 DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. SUCH DRAWINGS AND
 SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN THE FORM
 OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS,
 WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY WITH THE
 TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE SPECIFIC,
 AND THE TECHNICAL CODES SHALL NOT BE CITED AS A WHOLE
 OR IN PART, NOR SHALL THE TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS
 EQUIVALENT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC
 INFORMATION.
  
 7B) COMPLIED, NUCOR HAS INDICATED THIS CLASSIC ROOF
 PANEL IS NOT ALLOWED TO TAKE THE DOUBLE REDUCTION AS
 ALLOWED BY THE 2010 FBC-B SECTION 2210.5 / AISI SECTION
 D6.2.1A.
  
 8) COMPLIED, SHEET S3 DOES HAVE THE CORRECT WIND DESIGN
 170 MPH, EXPOSURE C, BLDG. CAT. II, MEAN ROOM HEIGHT OF
 34 FT. 8 1/4 INCHES, THE WALL PRESSURES IN VASD WALL
 ZONES 4 & 5, ARE GOOD.
  
 9A) SEMI-COMPLIED. NUCOR WALL & ROOF PRODUCT APPRVALS
 HAVE BEEN REVIEWED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD BUT THE
 VARIABLES ARE THERE, UNKNOWN IF THE 50 OR 80 KSI
 PRODUCT WILL BE INSTALLED, PRESSURES MAYOR MAY NOT
 WORK, ROOF SPAN CHART NOT AVAILABLE AS A REFERANCE.
 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING
 CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION 107.2.1 INFORMATION ON
 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 OF SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE
 AND EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT
 IT WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND
 RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS
 DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. SUCH DRAWINGS AND
 SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN THE FORM
 OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS,
 WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY WITH THE
 TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE SPECIFIC,
 AND THE TECHNICAL CODES SHALL NOT BE CITED AS A WHOLE
 OR IN PART, NOR SHALL THE TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS
 EQUIVALENT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC
 INFORMATION.
  
 9B) COMPLIANCE HAS NOT BEEN MET FOR COMPONENTS AND
 CLADDING. 2010 FBC-B 1609.1.2 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS,
 1609.6.4.41 COMPONENTS & CLADDING
 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS RULE 9N-3 NOV.
 01/ 2010 (31) SUB-CATEGORY OF PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION
 SYSTEMS THAT WILL REQUIRE PRODUCT APPROVALS:
 (31)(A) EXTERIOR DOORS.
 (B) WINDOWS
 (C) WALL LOUVERS RUSKIN WALL LOUVER SUBMITTED, NO FL
 APPROVAL COVER SHEET NOR REVIEWED BY THE DESIGNER OF
 RECORD.
 IT WOULD APPEAR THAT NUCOR IS TAKING THE RESPONSIBILITY
 FOR THEIR WALL AND ROOFING PRODUCCT APPROVALS AND THE
 CONTRACTOR ANDERSON-MOORE WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE
 EXTERIOR DOORS, WINDOWS AND WALL LOUVERS. SINCE SHEET
 S-3 HAS GOOD DESIGNPRESSURES EITHER THE CONTRACTOR OR
 DESIGNER OF RECORD CAN REQUEST IN WRITING FOR THESE
 PRODUCTS TO BE SUBMITTED AS DEFERRED SUBMITTALS.
  
 107.3.4.2 DEFERRED SUBMITTALS. FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS
 SECTION, DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ARE DEFINED AS THOSE
 PORTIONS OF THE DESIGN THAT ARE NOT SUBMITTED AT THE
 TIME OF THE APPLICATION AND THAT ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO
 THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD.
 DEFERRAL OF ANY SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL HAVE THE PRIOR
 APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. THE REGISTERED
 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE SHALL LIST
 THE DEFERRED SUBMITTALS ON THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
 FOR REVIEW BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. DOCUMENTS FOR
 DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE
 REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE
 WHO SHALL REVIEW THEM AND FORWARD THEM TO THE BUILDING
 OFFICIAL WITH A NOTATION INDICATING THAT THE DEFERRED
 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND FOUND TO BE
 IN GENERAL CONFORMANCE TO THE DESIGN OF THE BUILDING.
 THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED
 UNTIL THE DEFERRED SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS HAVE BEEN
 APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.
  
 10) 2010 FBC 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE
 PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE DCA RULE 9N-03
 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE
 DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR
 JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL.
 FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
 SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS,
 SHOP DRAWINGS ETC..
  
 11) COMPLIED.
  
 12) THE ENERGY CODE TOTAL BUILDING PERFORMANCE:
 12A) 3RD REQUEST PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION OF CODE
 COMPLIANCE. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FOR THE SHGC
 VALUES TAKEN OF (0.50) UNDER THE TOTAL BUILDING
 PERFORMANCE ENERGY 506.3.1. THE RESPONSE FROM AMC
 STATES THE ACTUAL SHGC VALUE OF THE GLAZING IS 0.90
 WHICH EXCEEDS THE BASELINE. WHAT I'M ASKING YOU FOR IS
 FOR PROOF THAT THESE WINDOWS MEET A SHGC COEFFIENT OF
 0.90. THE CALCULATED ENERGY CALCULATIONN IS TAKING
 CREDIT FOR IT, PROVE IT!
  
 12B-F) COMPLIED.
  
 13) COMPLIED. IMPACT FEES.
 14) PROVISO: ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
  
 THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
 ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT THAT APPLIES TO ANY REMODEL OR
 NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT
 APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED AFTER 7/1/14, AND THE TOTAL
 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN
 $500,000. PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ORDINANCE NO.
 4504-14, AND CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF
 ORDINANCES, ARTICLE V, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES, SECTION
 78-123(A) AND SECTION 78-126(A), THE ART ASSESSMENT IS
 1% OF THE TOTAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COST.
  
 PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF ORDINANCES, ARTICLE
 V, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES, SECTION 78-122, RENOVATION AND
 NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ARE ASSESSED CUMULATIVELY, SO
 THE ART ASSESSMENT WILL BE APPLICABLE TO ALL FUTURE
 PROJECTS.
  
 15) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE
 REVISION & REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES
 AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL
 REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION
  
 JAMES A. WITMER CBO
 SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 TEL: 561-805-6715
 FAX: 561-805-6676
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES HOME PAGE
 HTTP://WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/CONSTRUCTION/INDEX.PHP
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-03-26 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2015-03-18 Time 13:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2015-03-16 Time 09:48 Sent To  
Notes
2015-03-18 15:44:16BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 W. P. B. PERMIT: 14110863
 ADD: 5483 LEEPER DR.
 CONT: ANDERSON MOORE CONSTRUCTION
 TEL: (561) 662-1819
 E-MAIL: RKENNEY @AMCBUILD.COM
  
 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W
 * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION
 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013.
  
 IMPORTANT NOTICE: EFFECTIVE MARCH 30, 2015
 ALL PERMIT APPLICATION PLAN REVIEWS WILL BE PERFORMED
 ELECTRONICALLY
 UPON APPLICATION AND FEE PAYMENT DESIGN DOCUMENTS
 SUBMISSION OPTIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
 1 UPLOAD VIA THE PROJECT DOX PORTAL WITH DIGITAL
 SIGNATURES OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS AS APPLICABLE; USE
 THE REQUIRED NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT
 2 INCLUDE ON A CD IF DESIGN PROFESSIONAL DIGITAL
 SIGNATURES ARE PROVIDED AS REQUIRED; USE THE REQUIRED
 NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT
 3 INCLUDE ON A CD WITH ONE SET OF TRADITIONAL PAPER
 DESIGN DOCUMENTS SIGNED AND SEALED AS REQUIRED; USE THE
 REQUIRED NAMING CONVENTION FOR EACH DOCUMENT
 4 ONE SET OF TRADITIONAL PAPER DESIGN DOCUMENTS SUBJECT
 TO ADMINISTRATIVE FEES TO DIGITIZE THE DOCUMENTS
 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL BE PROVIDED WHEN IT BECOMES
 AVAILABLE
  
 2ND REVIEW
 DATE: WED. MARCH 18/2015
 ACTION: DENIED
  
 1-3) COMPLIED.
  
 4) 2ND REQUEST . ONLY (1) SOILS REPORT WAS SUBMITTED,
 NOTE THIS JOB REQUIRES A RESIDENT INSPECTOR REQUIRING
 (3) SOILS REPORTS SIGNED AND SEALED.
 1ST REVIEW COMMENT. NO SOILS REPORT WAS SUBMITTED,
 PLEASE PROVIDE A REPORT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH: 2010 FBC-B
 1803.5.2 QUESTIONABLE SOIL.
 WHERE THE CLASSIFICATION, STRENGTH OR COMPRESSIBILITY
 OF THE SOIL IS IN DOUBT OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING VALUE
 SUPERIOR TO THAT SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS CLAIMED, THE
 BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL BE PERMITTED TO REQUIRE THAT A
 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BE CONDUCTED. ALSO SEE
 1803.6 REPORTING.
  
 5) THE NEW CONSTRUCTION OF A METAL/ STEEL FRAME
 WAREHOUSE WITH WELDS AND BOLTABLE CONNECTIONS. THIS
 JOBSITE QUALIFIES FOR THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM.
  
 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING
 CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION,110.3.9 OTHER
 INSPECTIONS SERVICES. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY MAKE,
 OR CAUSE TO BE MADE BY OTHERS, THE INSPECTIONS REQUIRED
 BY SECTION 109. HE/SHE MAY ACCEPT REPORTS OF INSPECTORS
 OF RECOGNIZED INSPECTION SERVICES, PROVIDED THAT AFTER
 INVESTIGATION HE/SHE IS SATISFIED AS TO THEIR
 QUALIFICATIONS AND RELIABILITY. A CERTIFICATE CALLED
 FOR BY ANY PROVISION OF THE TECHNICAL CODES SHALL NOT
 BE BASED ON SUCH REPORTS UNLESS THE SAME ARE IN WRITING
 AND CERTIFIED BY A RESPONSIBLE OFFICER OF SUCH SERVICE.
 THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY REQUIRE THE OWNER TO EMPLOY
 AN INSPECTION SERVICE IN THE FOLLOWING INSTANCES:
 5. FOR BUILDINGS WITH AREA GREATER THAN 20,000 SQUARE
 FOOT
 7. FOR BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN OR
 METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION (WELDING AND BOLTABLE
 CONNECTIONS.
  
 5A) THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR FORMS WILL BE E-MAILED TO
 CONTACT [email protected] PLEASE FILE OUT THE
 RESIDENT INSPECTOR FORMS AND RETURN TO W.P.B. BUILDING
 DEPARTMENT CARE OF JIM WITMER.
  
 FORMS RETURNED ARE MISSING THE ;
 5A)(1) CERTIFIED INSPECTION CO. NAME. SHEET # 4
 5B((2) ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER SEAL & SIGNATURE. SHEET #
 5
  
 5B) FOR THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PLEASE PROVIDE A RESUME'
 OF INSPECTION EXPERIENCE ON PREVIOUS PROJECT. THE
 RESUME' MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY ALL CERTIFICATES AS
 SPECIFIED HEREIN. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS DESIGNEE
 WILL REVIEW THE RESUME'. AFTER THE RESUME' IS REVIEWED,
 AN INTERVIEW WILL BE SCHEDULED. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES
 WILL AN INSPECTOR BE INTERVIEWED FOR WORK WITHOUT FIRST
 MEETING THE ABOVE CRITERIA.
 CONTACT KEN CONRAD
 TEL: 561-805-6666
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 5C) THE CONTRACTOR WILL PRODUCE A JOB SUMMARY OR
 HISTORY FOR THIS TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. THIS MAY BE
 SUBMITTED TO KEN CONRAD BY E-MAIL. KEN CONRAD:
 [email protected]
  
 5D) NOTE FOR PAPER PLANS 3 SETS OF DOCUMENTS ARE
 REQUIRED. FOR DIGITAL PLANS, AFTER PERMIT ISSUANCE, THE
 PERMIT LIBRARIAN WILL E-MAIL YOU, THE APPROVED AND
 BATCH STAMPED PLANS SO YOU MAY PRINT YOUR PLANS, TWO
 SETS OF PLANS WILL NEED TO BE PRINTED IN COLOR, (1) FOR
 THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR, THE OTHER FOR THE MEP
 INSPECTORS.
  
 5E) PLEASE CALL THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH?S AUTOMATED
 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS LINE (561) 805-6700) FOR
 IN-PROGRESS INSPECTIONS FOR AUDITING OF JOBSITE
 INSPECTIONS.
  
  
  
 6) 2ND REVIEW. SHEET S-3 DOES PROVIDE COMPONENTS AND
 CLADDING PRESSURES FOR WALL ZONES 4 & 5 DESIGNED VULT
 FOR 170 MPH/ 3 SECOND GUST, EXPOSURE C. PRESSURES ARE
 GOOD FOR A 35 FT. MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. SHEET A-4.00
 INDICATES A MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF 38?-11? AND A EAVE
 HEIGHT OF 34?-8?. BY DEFINITION OF MEAN ROOF HEIGHT WE
 USE THE EAVE HEIGHT WHEN THE ROOF ANGLE OF LESS THAN OR
 EQUAL TO 10 DEGRESS (ACTUAL DEGREES OF 9.74). THE MEAN
 ROOF HEIGHT OF 34?-8? SHOULD BE USED. THE DESIGNER OF
 RECORD IS DEFERRING THE COMPONENTS AND CLADDING
 PRESSURES TO THE NUCOR METAL BUILDING ENGINEER .
  
 THE NUCOR BUILDING IS DESIGNED TO VULT TO 180 MPH,
 EXPOSURE C AND A MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF 30 FT. (FROM
 FLOOR) NOT THE 35 FT. (34?-8?) TAKEN FROM GRADE. THERE
 IS A DIFFERENCE IN WIND SPEED DESIGN AND MEAN ROOF
 HEIGHT. WITH THE MORE STRIKER WIND DESIGN THE
 COMPONENTS AND CLADDING UNDER THE 170 WILL FAIL
 ALLOWING THE BUILDING TO EITHER IMPLODE OR EXPLODE
 DEPENDING ON THE WIND DIRECTION AND SIZE OF THE BREACH,
 THE BUILDING WAS NOT DESIGNED AS A PARTIALLY OPEN
 BUILDING. THERE CAN ONLY BE ONE DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR
 THE BUILDING, WHEN THE ENGINEERING IS DEFERRED THE TWO
 ENGINEERS NEED TO COME TO A CONCLUSION AS TO WHICH
 DESIGN THE BUILDING IS TO BE BUILT.
  
 COMMENTS FROM 1ST REVIEW. SHEET S-3.0 INDICATES DESIGN
 CRITERIA FOR THE METAL STRUCTURAL PORTION OF THIS
 BUILDING, UNDER THE 1ST REVIEW THERE WAS NO DOCUMENTS
 SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. NOTE THERE IS NO MENTION TO THE
 COMPONENTS AND CLADDING THAT DEALS WITH THE METAL SKIN
 AS TO THEIR DESIGN CRITERIA? WILL THE WHOLE BUILDING BE
 DESIGNED UNDER ASCE 7-10 OR WILL THERE BE OTHER DESIGN
 CRITERIA FOR THE METAL FRAMING AND CLADDING OF THE
 BUILDING. THE PLANS ARE INCOMPLETE; THERE ARE ALSO NO
 MEZZANINE DETAILS, SHEET S-2.0 FOR BOTH THE FOUNDATION
 AND MEZZANINE BOTH REFER TO THE METAL BUILDING
 MANUFACTURER FOR THE ANCHOR BOLT LAYOUT.
  
  
 7) 2ND REQUEST. THE DESIGNER OF RECORD IS DEFERRING THE
 ROOF PRESSURES AND WALL PANEL PRESSURES TO THE NUCOR
 BUILDING ENGINEER. NUCOR PLANS DOES NOT PROVIDE
 COMPONENT & CLADDING PRESSURES FOR ROOF ZONES NOR WALL
 ZONES. THERE STRUCTURAL CALCULATION SHEET A2 DOES SHOW
 VULT PRESSURES ( ASSUMED, CALCULATIONS DOES NOT STATE
 VULT OR VASD ) FOR ZONES 1, 2, & 3, SHEET A4 WALL
 PRESSURES FOR ZONES 4 & 5 AGAIN PRESSURES DO NOT STATE
 IF THEY ARE VULT OR VASD. NOTES ON BOTH SHEETS INDICATE
 AISI 2007 SPECIFICATIONS. IF THE NUCOR DESIGNERS ARE
 GOING FOR THE DOUBLE REDUCTION IN ALLOWABLE PRESSURES,
 THEY WILL NEED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH AISI 100-2007
 D6.2.1A(A-G). INDICATE IF PRESSURES ARE VULT OR VASD
 AND IF THE REDUCTIONS ALLOWED BY AISI 100-2007 WERE
 TAKEN.
  
 WITHIN THE NUCOR PLANS SUBMITTED THERE ARE NO SECTIONS
 CIRCLED SHOWING WHICH APPLICATIONS WILL BE APPLICABLE
 TO THIS JOB.
  
 NOTE THE NUCOR PLANS C1OF 1 LIST VARIOUS FLORIDA STATE
 APPROVALS NONE HAVE BEEN CIRCLED. THERE ALSO WERE NO
 PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED FOR EITHER THE WALL PANELS
 OR ROOF PANELS.
  
 PLEASE ALSO SEE THE DESIGNER OF RECORDS COMMENTS AS TO
 THE DEFICIENCIES FOUND IN THE NUCOR BUILDING SYSTEM
 PLANS.
  
 COMMENT 1ST REVIEW. SHEET S-3.0 MISSING THE ROOF
 PRESSURES FOR THE COMPONENTS AND CLADDING. PROVIDE THE
 MEAN ROOF HEIGHT THE PRESSURES WILL BE TAKEN AT. ALSO
 TAKE THE PRESSURES UNDER COMPONENTS AND CLADDING FOR 10
 SQ FT. 107.2.1.2 FOR ROOF ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED BY THE
 CODE, THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL
 ILLUSTRATE, DESCRIBE AND DELINEATE THE TYPE OF ROOFING
 SYSTEM, MATERIALS, FASTENING REQUIREMENTS, FLASHING
 REQUIREMENTS AND WIND RESISTANCE RATING THAT ARE
 REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED. PRODUCT EVALUATION AND
 INSTALLATION SHALL INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE WIND
 CRITERIA REQUIRED FOR THE SPECIFIC SITE OR A STATEMENT
 BY AN ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER FOR THE SPECIFIC SITE MUST
 BE SUBMITTED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.
  
 8) SEMI- COMPLIED, THE PRESSURES PROVIDED ARE GOOD FOR
 A 170 VASD / 35 FT MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. WILL NEED TO
 DISCUSS WITH NUCOR TO SEE WHICH OF THE DESIGN
 PARAMETERS WILL BE USED FOR THE WHOLE OF THE BUILDING.
  
 9) UNABLE TO DETERMINE PRESSURES UNTIL THE WIND DESIGN
 CRITERIA IS DETERMINED BETWEEN THE DESIGNER OF RECORD
 AND NUCORS ENGINEER. 2010 FBC-B 1609.1.2 PROTECTION OF
 OPENINGS, 1609.6.4.41 COMPONENTS & CLADDING. FLORIDA
 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS RULE 9N-3 NOV. 01/ 2010
 (31) SUB-CATEGORY OF PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION SYSTEMS
 THAT WILL REQUIRE PRODUCT APPROVALS:
 (31)(A) EXTERIOR DOORS.
 (B) WINDOWS
 (C) PANEL WALLS: STOREFRONTS, WALL LOUVERS,
 (D) ROOFING PRODUCTS AND ASSEMBLIES
  
 10) 2010 FBC 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE
 PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE DCA RULE 9N-03
 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE
 DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR
 JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL.
 FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
 SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS,
 SHOP DRAWINGS ETC..
  
 11) COMPLIED
  
 12) THE ENERGY CODE TOTAL BUILDING PERFORMANCE:
 12A) 2ND REQUEST PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION OF CODE
 COMPLIANCE. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FOR THE SHGC
 VALUES TAKEN OF (0.50) UNDER THE TOTAL BUILDING
 PERFORMANCE ENERGY 506.3.1.
  
 12B-F) COMPLIED.
  
 13) COMPLIED. IMPACT FEES.
  
 14) NEW COMMENT: ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
  
 THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
 ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT THAT APPLIES TO ANY REMODEL OR
 NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECT FOR WHICH THE PERMIT
 APPLICATION WAS SUBMITTED AFTER 7/1/14, AND THE TOTAL
 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COSTS ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN
 $500,000. PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ORDINANCE NO.
 4504-14, AND CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF
 ORDINANCES, ARTICLE V, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES, SECTION
 78-123(A) AND SECTION 78-126(A), THE ART ASSESSMENT IS
 1% OF THE TOTAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COST.
  
 PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF ORDINANCES, ARTICLE
 V, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES, SECTION 78-122, RENOVATION AND
 NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ARE ASSESSED CUMULATIVELY, SO
 THE ART ASSESSMENT WILL BE APPLICABLE TO ALL FUTURE
 PROJECTS.
  
 15) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE
 REVISION & REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES
 AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL
 REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE
 REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION
 PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO
 EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED
 COOPERATION.
  
 A THOROUGH REVIEW CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A
 RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF
 THIS REVIEW.
  
 JAMES A. WITMER CBO
 SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 TEL: 561-805-6715
 FAX: 561-805-6676
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2014-12-09 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2014-12-09 Time 13:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2014-12-08 Time 15:34 Sent To  
Notes
2014-12-08 16:54:00BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 PERMIT: 14110863
 ADD: 5483 LEEPER DR
 CONT: ANDERSON MOORE
 TEL: (561)662-1819
  
 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W
 * 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION, 2010 EDITION
 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS ADOPTED APRIL 25/2013.
  
 2010 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3
 COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS,
 SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS
 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING.
  
 1ST REVIEW
 DATE: MON. 08/2014
 ACTION: DENIED
  
 1) TITLE SHEET T.100 UNDER THE HEADING OF PROJECT DATA
 LIST THIS STRUCTURES OCCUPANCY AS A FACTORY INDUSTRIAL
 GROUP F1 MODERATE HAZARD OCCUPANCY.
 THERE SEAMS TO BE A DISCREPANCY WITHIN THE TITLE SHEET,
 SEE THE TOTAL OCCUPANCY LOADS TAKEN THEY ARE EITHER FOR
 BUSINESS OR STORAGE OCCUPANCIES NOT A
 F1 OCCUPANCY. SHEET LS.100 ALSO LIST THE LARGE AREA AS
 A DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE NOT A FACTORY INDUSTRIAL
 OCCUPANCY. PLEASE PROVIDE HOW THE AREA BEING USED AS A
 DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE IS CONSIDERED A F1 OCCUPANCY?
 107.2.1.3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS REQUIRED. FBC-B
 306.2 FACTORY INDUSTRIAL F-1 MODERATE HAZARD AND SEE
 SECTIONS FBC-B 311.2 S1 OCCUPANCIES & 311.3 S-2 LOW
 HAZARD OCCUPANCIES.
  
 2) DEPENDING ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF TYPE OF STORAGE
 OCCUPANCY S1 VERSES S2 FBC-B TABLE 508.4 MAY REQUIRE
 FIRE RATED OCCUPANCY SEPERATION WALLS.
 THE DESIGNER OF RECORD HAS NOT DECLARED HOW THIS
 STRUCTURE WAS DESIGNED SEE FBC-B :
 508.2.5.1 FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED SEPARATION.
 508.2.5.2 NONFIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED SEPARATION AND
 PROTECTION.
  
 3) THE TITLE SHEET LIST THE COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL OF
 28'-11"/ MAX. PROVIDED (50'). PLEASE REFER TO SHEET
 LS.101 THE MEZZANINE LEVEL FROM THE FURTHEST POINT ON
 THE MEZZANINE TO THE BOTTOM OF THE STAIRS A MAXIMUM OF
 100 FT. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE FOR A STORAGE OCCUPANCY
 /SPRINKLERED 100 FT. FBC-B 1014.3 EXCEPTION 1 & 2.
  
 4) THIS IS NEW CONSTRUCTION OF A WAREHOUSE, SHEET S-3
 FOUNDATION NOTE # 9 THE DESIGN CRITERIA FOR THE
 FOUNDATIONS ASSUMES A MINIMUM SAFE BEARING VALUE OF
 2,500 PSF. NO SOILS REPORT WAS SUBMITTED, PLEASE
 PROVIDE A REPORT FOR COMPLIANCE WITH: 2010 FBC-B
 1803.5.2 QUESTIONABLE SOIL.
 WHERE THE CLASSIFICATION, STRENGTH OR COMPRESSIBILITY
 OF THE SOIL IS IN DOUBT OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING VALUE
 SUPERIOR TO THAT SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS CLAIMED, THE
 BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL BE PERMITTED TO REQUIRE THAT A
 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BE CONDUCTED. ALSO SEE
 1803.6 REPORTING.
  
 5) THE NEW CONSTRUCTION OF A METAL/ STEEL FRAME
 WAREHOUSE WITH WELDS AND BOLTABLE CONNECTIONS. THIS
 JOBSITE QUALIFIES FOR THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR PROGRAM.
  
 2010 WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING
 CODE, CHAPTER 1, ADMINISTRATION,110.3.9 OTHER
 INSPECTIONS SERVICES. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY MAKE,
 OR CAUSE TO BE MADE BY OTHERS, THE INSPECTIONS REQUIRED
 BY SECTION 109. HE/SHE MAY ACCEPT REPORTS OF INSPECTORS
 OF RECOGNIZED INSPECTION SERVICES, PROVIDED THAT AFTER
 INVESTIGATION HE/SHE IS SATISFIED AS TO THEIR
 QUALIFICATIONS AND RELIABILITY. A CERTIFICATE CALLED
 FOR BY ANY PROVISION OF THE TECHNICAL CODES SHALL NOT
 BE BASED ON SUCH REPORTS UNLESS THE SAME ARE IN WRITING
 AND CERTIFIED BY A RESPONSIBLE OFFICER OF SUCH SERVICE.
 THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY REQUIRE THE OWNER TO EMPLOY
 AN INSPECTION SERVICE IN THE FOLLOWING INSTANCES:
 5. FOR BUILDINGS WITH AREA GREATER THAN 20,000 SQUARE
 FOOT
 7. FOR BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES OF UNUSUAL DESIGN OR
 METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION (WELDING AND BOLTABLE
 CONNECTIONS.
  
 5A) THE RESIDENT INSPECTOR FORMS WILL BE E-MAILED TO
 CONTACT [email protected] PLEASE FILE OUT THE
 RESIDENT INSPECTOR FORMS AND RETURN TO W.P.B. BUILDING
 DEPARTMENT CARE OF JIM WITMER.
  
 5B) 110.4 INSPECTION AGENCIES. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL IS
 AUTHORIZED TO ACCEPT REPORTS OF APPROVED INSPECTION
 AGENCIES, PROVIDED SUCH AGENCIES SATISFY THE
 REQUIREMENTS AS TO QUALIFICATIONS AND RELIABILITY.
  
 5B) 110.5 INSPECTION REQUESTS. IT SHALL BE THE DUTY OF
 THE HOLDER OF THE BUILDING PERMIT OR THEIR DULY
 AUTHORIZED AGENT TO NOTIFY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WHEN
 WORK IS READY FOR INSPECTION. IT SHALL BE THE DUTY OF
 THE PERMIT HOLDER TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO AND MEANS FOR
 INSPECTIONS OF SUCH WORK THAT ARE REQUIRED
 BY THIS CODE.
  
 5E) SINCE THIS PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A RESIDENT
 INSPECTOR 3 SETS OF PLANS/ PRODUCT APPROVALS WILL BE
 REQUIRED. 110.3.9.
  
 6) SHEET S-3.0 INDICATES DESIGN CRITERIA FOR THE METAL
 STRUCTURAL PORTION OF THIS BUILDING, UNDER THE 1ST
 REVIEW THERE WAS NO DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW.
 NOTE THERE IS NO MENTION TO THE COMPONENTS AND CLADDING
 THAT DEALS WITH THE METAL SKIN AS TO THEIR DESIGN
 CRITERIA? WILL THE WHOLE BUILDING BE DESIGNED UNDER
 ASCE 7-10 OR WILL THERE BE OTHER DESIGN CRITERIA FOR
 THE METAL FRAMING AND CLADDING OF THE BUILDING. THE
 PLANS ARE INCOMPLETE, THERE ARE ALSO NO MEZZANINE
 DETAILS, SHEET S-2.0 FOR BOTH THE FOUNDATION AND
 MEZZANINE BOTH REFER TO THE METAL BUILDING MANUFACTURER
 FOR THE ANCHOR BOLT LAYOUT.
  
 107.3.5 MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA FOR BUILDINGS.
 107.3.5.1 COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS
 8. STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS SHALL INCLUDE:
 WIND REQUIREMENTS /BUILDING ENVELOPE MISSING ROOF
 PRESSURES
 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS (IF REQUIRED)
 WALL SYSTEMS
 FLOOR SYSTEMS
 ROOF SYSTEMS
 STAIR SYSTEMS
  
 7) SHEET S-3.0 MISSING THE ROOF PRESSURES FOR THE
 COMPONENTS AND CLADDING. PROVIDE THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT
 THE PRESSURES WILL BE TAKEN AT. ALSO
 TAKE THE PRESSURES UNDER COMPONENTS AND CLADDING FOR 10
 SQ FT. 107.2.1.2 FOR ROOF ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED BY THE
 CODE, THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL
 ILLUSTRATE, DESCRIBE AND DELINEATE THE TYPE OF ROOFING
 SYSTEM, MATERIALS, FASTENING REQUIREMENTS, FLASHING
 REQUIREMENTS AND WIND RESISTANCE RATING THAT ARE
 REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED. PRODUCT EVALUATION AND
 INSTALLATION SHALL INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE WIND
 CRITERIA REQUIRED FOR THE SPECIFIC SITE OR A STATEMENT
 BY AN ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER FOR THE SPECIFIC SITE MUST
 BE SUBMITTED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.
  
 8) SHEET S-3.0 THE WALL PRESSURES FOR BOTH ZONES 4 &
 END ZONE 5 ARE LOW, THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT TAKEN AT 42
 FT. ALSO NOTE THE CHART PROVIDES RANGES OF SQ. FT.
 (EXAMPLE 21 TO 50 SQ. FT ) FL CHARTS UNDER BOTH ASCE
 7-10 AND 1609 ARE SPECIFIC 10 SQ. FT., 20 SQ. FT., 50
 SQ. FT. IF YOU HAVE AN OPENING LETS SAY AT 30 SQ. FT.
 THAT IS WHERE YOU INTERPOLATE BETWEEN THE 2 PRESSURES.
 IF THE PRESSUES ARE BEING DERIVED FROM SOME OTHER
 SOURCE PLEASE PROVIDE THE SOURCE?
  
 9) 2010 FBC-B 1609.1.2 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS,
 1609.6.4.41 COMPONENTS & CLADDING.FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
 COMMUNITY AFFAIRS RULE 9N-3 NOV. 01/ 2010 (31)
 SUB-CATEGORY OF PRODUCTS OR CONSTRUCTION SYSTEMS THAT
 WILL REQUIRE PRODUCT APPROVALS:
 (31)(A) EXTERIOR DOORS.
 (B) WINDOWS
 (C) PANEL WALLS: STOREFRONTS, WALL LOUVERS,
 (D) ROOFING PRODUCTS AND ASSEMBLIES
  
 10) 2010 FBC 107.3.4.1 PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE
 PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY THE DCA RULE 9N-03
 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE
 DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR
 JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL.
 FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR
 SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS,
 SHOP DRAWINGS ETC..
  
 11) LIFE SAFETY SHEET LS.101 THE MEZZANINE LIFE SAFETY
 SHOWS THE SCALE AT 3/32 NDS THIS WOULD EXCEED TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, TYPO SCALE ABOVE FOR THE 1ST FLOOR PLAN IS
 3/16 THS OF AN INCH. 107.2.1.3 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION,
 DISCREPANCY IN PLANS.
  
 12) THE ENERGY CODE TOTAL BUILDING PERFORMANCE:
 12A) PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FOR THE SHGC VALUES
 TAKEN OF (0.50) UNDER THE TOTAL BUILDING
 PERFORMANCEENERGY 506.3.1.
  
 12B) WALLS IN ZONES 3 & 4 BOTH INDICATE THEY ARE IN THE
 NE WALL ZONES WHERE THEY ARE IN THE N.W., S.W. & S.E.
 CORRECT VALUES IN REPORT. TOTAL BUILDING
 PERFORMANCEENERGY 506.3.1.
  
 12C) WINDOWS IN THE N. E. & N.W. WALLS BOTH INDICATE A
 9'-0" TALL WINDOW IN THE ENERGY REPORT WHERE AS THE
 PLANS SHEET A-3.00 INDICATE THEY ARE 10'-0" TALL.
 CORRECT THE ENERGY REPORT FOR CALCULATIONS.
  
 12D) IN THE ENERGY REPORT WINDOWS IN WALL ZONES 3 & 4
 ARE WRONG THEY ARE 22 FT. LONG BUT THE WINDOWS ARE ONLY
 9'-2" TALL INTHIS SECTION.
  
 12E) IN THE ENERGY REPORT THE INTERIOR WALLS FOR ZONES
 3 & 4 ARE NOT CONCRETE WALLS SHEET A-1.01 IDENTIFIES AS
 A WALL MARKER TYPE P1 WALL, PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 12F) THE ROOFING INSULATION IS SHOWN IN THE ENERGY
 REPORT AS A MTL BLDG ROOF R-19, UNDER THE MATERIALS
 USED PORTION OF REPORT IT DECLARES A BUILT UP ROOF 3/8
 INCHES, WITH 6 INCHES OF INSULATION TO MAKE A R-30.3
 VALUE.
 NOTE ABOVE THE OFFICE AREA IS A NON-A/C MEZZANINE. WITH
 A 4 INCH CONCRETE DECK SEPARATING THE AIR CONDITIONED
 OFFICE SPACE FROM THE NON- A/C MEZZANINE, SHEET A7.00
 DETAILS 1-3 SHOW 6 INCH INSULATION LAYED ON TOP OF THE
 DROPPED CEILING TILE.CORRECT VALUES.
  
 12G) SHEET A7.00 DETAILS 1-3 SHOW 6 INCH INSULATION
 LAYED ON TOP OF THE DROPPED CEILING TILE. 2010 ENERGY
 502.2.1.2 CEILING INSULATION.
 INSULATION INSTALLED ON A SUSPENDED CEILING WITH
 REMOVABLE CEILING TILES SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED PART OF
 THE MINIMUM THERMAL RESISTANCE OF THE ROOF INSULATION
 UNLESS THE ROOF/CEILING CAVITY IS SEALED FROM THE
 EXTERIOR ENVIRONMENT.
  
 13) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT
 FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL
 PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND
 A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT
 APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE
 INFORMATION.
  
 14) WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE
 REVISION & REMOVE ANY VOIDED SHEETS & REPLACE ANY PAGES
 AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL
 REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE
 REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION
 PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO
 EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED
 COOPERATION.
  
 A THOROUGH REVIEW CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A
 RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF
 THIS REVIEW.
  
 JAMES A. WITMER CBO
 SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 TEL: 561-805-6715
 FAX: 561-805-6676
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2014-12-23 Cont ID  
Sent By dhayes Date 2014-12-23 Time 11:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dhayes Date 2014-12-23 Time 10:58 Sent To  
Notes
2014-12-23 11:08:4312/23/2014
 PROJECT: BE GROUP
 PERMIT#: 14110863
 CODE: 2008 EDITION OF THE NEC, 2010 EDITION OF THE FBC
 ,2010 WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC, CHAPTER 1,
 ADMINISTRATION, 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS.
 1ST ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
 ACTION: APPROVED WITH EXCEPTION
  
 1) REVISE LIGHTING PLANS TO INCLUDE PROVISIONS FOR
 COMPLIANCE WITH FBC ENERGY 505.2 LIGHTING CONTROLS
 (MANDATORY). LIGHTING SYSTEMS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH
 CONTROLS AS REQUIRED IN SECTIONS 505.2.1, 505.2.2,
 505.2.3 AND 505.2.4.
  
 2) SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATIONS ACCOMPANIED BY
 MANUFACTURERS EQUIPMENT SUBMITTALS, AND SHOP DRAWINGS
 ARE REQUIRED FOR SITE LIGHTING, GENERATORS. HOOD
 EXHAUST, FIRE ALARM, ACCESS CONTROL SYSTEM, SECURITY,
 CCTV, NETWORK, DATA, AND, COMMUNICATION.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. SEE LINK:
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEVELOPMENT/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/SITES/33/
 2013/09/APPLICATION_RESUBMITTAL_FORM_04132010.PDF
  
 ADDITIONALLY, IT IS REQUIRED TO INSERT THE CORRECTED
 PAGES INTO THE DENIED SUBMITTAL PACKAGE. VOID THE
 PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND LEAVE FOR COMPARATIVE
 REVIEW.
  
 DAVID HAYES, ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER, PX3421,
 561-805-6717 OR [email protected]
  
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2015-03-05 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 2015-03-05 Time 14:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 2015-03-05 Time 13:46 Sent To  
Notes
2015-03-05 14:00:19ALSO REVIEWED UNDER E14120031
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2014-12-15 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 2014-12-15 Time 13:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 2014-12-15 Time 13:31 Sent To E
Notes
2014-12-15 13:34:16ENGINEERING DEPT COMMENTS
  
 AS MENTIONED DURING THE PPRC REVIEW, AN ENGINEERING
 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION IS REQUIRED FOR THIS
 PROJECT. TECHNICAL DETAILS OF THE WATER, SEWER,
 STORMWATER, TRAFFIC CIRCULATION, AND SOLID WASTE
 COLLECTION WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 KELLY CRANFORD, P.E.
 LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 [email protected]
 561-494-1098 (OFFICE)
  
  
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2015-05-18 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2015-05-18 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2015-05-18 Time 12:01 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2015-04-20 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2015-04-20 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2015-04-20 Time 14:22 Sent To  
Notes
2015-04-20 15:20:523RD REVIEW, FIRE MARSHAL PETER LEDUC.
  
 THE RESPONSE COMMENTS REGARDING THE SINGLE MEZZANINE
 EXIT ARE DUELY NOTED.
  
 1) HOWEVER, IN JUSTIFYING THE REDUCED CHANGE OF
 OCCUPANY TO LOW HAZARD IS CHALLENGING. STACKING
 PRODUCTS ON WOOD PALLETS UP TO 24FT HIGH IS NOT LOW
 HAZARD. HAVING A SMALL PARTS WAREHOUSE UNDER THE
 MEZZANINE IS NOT LOW HAZARD. A SITE PLAN WAS NOT
 PROVIDED INDICATING THE PLACEMENT OF RACKS WITHIN THE
 WAREHOUSE. INCLUDED SHALL BE ALL PROPOSED RACK
 LOCATIONS, HEIGHT AND WIDTHS, ISLE WIDTHS AND ALL TYPES
 OF COMMODITIES LISTED AND STORED AT EACH RACK LOCATION.
 UNLESS SOME COMPLEING INFOMATION IS PROVIDED JUSTIFYING
 THIS AS A LOW HAZARD STORAGE OCCUPANCY, IN THE
 JUDGEMENT OF THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU IT IS AN
 ORDINARY HAZARD STORAGE OCCUPANCY AND A SECOND EXIT IS
 REQUIRED FROM THE MEZZANINE BECAUSE THE COMMON PATH OF
 TRAVEL DOES NOT MEET THE 100FT MAXIMUM AS NOTED BELOW.
  
 THE DEFINITION OF ORDINARY HAZARD CONTENTS IS NFPA 101
 6.2.2.3 * ORDINARY HAZARD CONTENTS SHALL BE CLASSIFIED
 AS THOSE THAT ARE LIKELY TO BURN WITH MODERATE RAPIDITY
 OR TO GIVE OFF A CONSIDERABLE VOLUME OF SMOKE. THE
 APPENDIX NARRATIVE STATES THAT ORDINARY HAZARD
 CLASSIFICATION REPRESENTS THE CONDITIONS FOUND IN MOST
 BUILDINGS AND IS THE BASIS FOR THE GENERAL
 REQUIRERMENTS OF THE CODE. THE FEAR OF POISONOUS FUMES
 OR EXPLOSIONS IS NECESSARILY A RELATIVE MATTER TO BE
 DETERMINED ON A JUDGEMENT BASIS. ALL SMOKE CONTAINS
 SOME TOXIC FIRE GASES BUT, UNDER CONDITIONS OF ORDINARY
 HAZARD, THERE SHOULD BE NO UNDULY DANGEROUS EXPOSURE
 DURING THE PERIOD NECESASRY TO ESCAPE FROM THE FIRE
 AREA, ASSUMING THERE ARE PROPER EXITS.
  
 IN THE APPENDIX NARRATIVE FOR LOW HAZARD IT STATES,
 CHAPTER 42 RECOGNIZES STORAGE OF NONCOMBUSTIBLE
 MATERIALS AS LOW HAZARD. IN OTHER OCCUPANCIES, IT IS
 ASSUMED THAT, EVEN WHERE THE ACTUAL CONTENTS HAZARD IS
 NORMALLY LOW, THERE IS SUFFICIENT LIKLIHOOD THAT SOME
 COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS OR HAZARDOUS OPERATIONS WILL BE
 INTRODUCED IN CONNECTION WITH BUILDING REPAIR OR
 MAINTENANCE, OR SOME PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTOR MIGHT CREATE
 CONDITIONS CONDUCTIVE TO PANIC, SO THAT THE EGRESS
 FACILTIES CANNOT SAFELY BE REDUCED BELOW THOSE
 SPECIFIED FOR ORDINARY HAZARD CONTENTS.
  
 AGAIN, BASED ON REVIEW OF THE ABOVE IN AFTER REVIEW OF
 YOUR PROPOSED OCCUPANCY IT IS A ORDINARY HAZARD STORAGE
 OCCUPANCY AND SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
 FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE.
  
 ADDITIONALLY, THE PARTS STORAGE AREA CAN NOT BE
 CLASSIFIED AS LOW HAZARD, IT IS A ORDINARY HAZARD AT
 BEST, BUT MAY BE HIGH HAZARD DEPENDING ON YOUR
 SUBMITTED FLOOR LAYOUT AND COMMODITY STORAGE, THUSLY
 PROVIDING FOR A MIXED OCCUPANCY BUILDING AND
 REQUIRENING THE MOST STRINGENT CODE PROTECTION;
 ORDINARY HAZARD.
  
 2) THE COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL OF 98.1FT IS MEASURED IN A
 STRAIGHT LINE. IN STORAGE OCCUPANCIES A MEASUREMNET IN
 A STRAIGHT LINE IS NOT AN ACCURATE ASSUMPTION. A
 PROPOSED FLOOR LAYOUT FOR THE MEZZANINE IS REQUIRED.
 TRAVEL DISTANCE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA
 7.6.1. IT IS GOOD PRACTICE IN BUILDING DESIGN TO
 RECOGNIZE THE INFLUENCE OF CONTENTS AND OCCUPANCY
 STORAGE FEATURES THUS REDUCING THE HAZARD OF EXCESSIVE
 TRAVEL DISTANCES; AT 98.1FT THERE IS NO ROOM FOR ANY
 STORAGE ON THE MEZZANINE. ALLOWING FOR STORAGE AND
 PROVIDING A REVISED COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL THAT WOULD
 REFLECT A MORE ACCURATE ROUTE WOULD CLEARLY EXCEED THE
 100' DISTANCE.
  
 THE FFPC IS MORE STRINGENT FOR ORDINARY HAZARD STORAGE,
 ADDITIONALLY, NFPA 101 42.2.4.1 (2) , FOR AN ORDINARY
 HAZARD STORAGE, IT CLEARLY STATES THAT THE EXIT (NOT
 COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL) SHALL BE REACHED WITHIN THE 100'
 DISTANCE. THE PLAN INDICATES 123'-11".
  
 3) THE PROPOSED EXIT FROM THE BREAKROOM INTO AND
 THROUGH THE SMALL PARTS AREA IS NOT APPROVED. AN AREA
 OF LESSER HAZARD CAN NOT PASS THROUGH AN AREA OF
 GREATER HAZARD.
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-03-04 Cont ID  
Sent By PLEDUC Date 2015-03-04 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2015-03-03 Time 14:02 Sent To  
Notes
2015-03-04 10:31:42THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE
 MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 THERE IS INSUFFICIENT DOCUMENTATION JUSTIFYING THE
 CHANGE OF THE OCCUPANCY HAZARD FROM ORDINARY TO
 LOW/LIGHT.
  
 A SECOND EXIT REMAINS A REQUIREMENT FROM THE MEZZANINE.
  
 INFORMATION DOCUMENTED ON THE PROPOSED FIRE SPRINKLER
 SYSTEM INDICATES EXTRA HAZARD GROUP 2 AND ORDINARY
 HAZARD GROUP 2 COMMODITY PROTECTION. BASED ON THIS
 INFOMATION A SECOND EXIT FROM THE MEZZANINE REMAINS A
 REQUIREMENT. ADDITIONALLY, RACK FIRE SPRINKLERS MAY BE
 REQUIRED BASED ON THE REVIEW OF THE BELOW ADDITIONAL
 SUBMITTED INFORMATION.
  
 IN SUPPORT OF YOUR PROPOSED OCCUPANCY HAZARD
 CLASSIFICATION CHANGE, PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAILED
 ACCOUNTING AND FLOOR LAYOUT OF THE STORAGE COMMODITY,
 EACH RACK HEIGHT, EACH RACK LOCATION, INCLUDING ISLE
 WIDTHS, AND HOW THE PRODUCTS ARE PACKAGED, PALLETIZED
 AND STORED.
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2014-12-01 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 2014-12-01 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 2014-12-01 Time 11:21 Sent To  
Notes
2014-12-01 15:15:46THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE
 MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 A FIRE SPRINKLER CONCEPTUAL DRAWING WAS NOT SUBMITTED
 AND IS REQUIRED.
  
 A SECOND MEANS OF EGRESS FROM THE MEZZANINE IS
 REQUIRED. THE COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL IS EXCEEDED PER
 TABLE 40.2.5. OF NFPA 101.
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By shill Date 2015-05-14 Time 07:06 Sent To  
Notes
2015-05-15 07:06:19C25
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2015-05-13 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2015-05-13 Time 14:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2015-04-16 Time 17:02 Sent To  
Notes
2015-04-16 17:02:45C37
  
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2015-04-02 Cont ID  
Sent By tklarge Date 2015-04-02 Time 05:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tklarge Date 2015-03-03 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2015-03-03 06:26:11SENT TO C-25.
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2015-01-15 Cont ID  
Sent By hmoser Date 2015-01-15 Time 15:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2014-11-24 Time 07:04 Sent To  
Notes
2014-11-25 07:05:23INCOMING SENT TO C-03. JW
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2015-03-18 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2015-03-18 Time 15:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2015-03-18 Time 15:44 Sent To  
Notes
2015-03-18 15:47:07IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT
 TRACKING # MU-2015-000378-0000
 RECEIPT# 2015-0302-261
 FEES $55,856.15.
Review Stop IMPACT COUNTY IMPACT FEES
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2014-12-08 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2014-12-08 Time 15:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2014-12-08 Time 15:34 Sent To  
Notes
2014-12-08 15:34:54BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT
 FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL
 PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND
 A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT
 APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE
 INFORMATION.
  
 JAMES A. WITMER CBO
 SENIOR COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER
 TEL: 561-805-6715
 FAX: 561-805-6676
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2014-12-30 Cont ID  
Sent By hmoser Date 2014-12-30 Time 13:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By hmoser Date 2014-12-30 Time 08:55 Sent To  
Notes
2014-12-30 14:02:54PASS PROVISO
  
 1) 606.2.1 SUPPLY AIR SYSTEM, 606.3 INSTALLATION
 AND 606.4.1 SUPERVISION. 2010 FBC (M)
 2) 304.1 GENERAL 2010 FBC (M)
  
 PLAN REVIEW BY HAROLD MOSER
 [email protected]
 OFFICE 561-805-6732
 FAX 561-805-6676
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2015-05-05 Cont ID  
Sent By tklarge Date 2015-05-05 Time 06:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tklarge Date 2015-05-05 Time 06:04 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-04-02 Cont ID  
Sent By TLARGE Date 2015-04-02 Time 05:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tklarge Date 2015-04-02 Time 04:21 Sent To  
Notes
2015-04-02 05:39:271) SHT. P2 - NOTE #1 STATES "REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS
 FOR CONTINUATION" BUT THERE ARE NO CIVIL DRAWINGS IN
 THE PLAN SET. SUBMIT A SET OF CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR
 REVIEW. 2ND REQUEST.
 2) INDICATE ON THE PLANS THAT AN APPROVED TYPE BACKFLOW
 PREVENTION DEVICE WILL BE PLACED AT THE METER PER CITY
 ORDINANCE SEC. 90-33 AND THE CITY'S CROSS CONNECTION
 MANUAL.2ND REQUEST
  
 PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW
 TIM LARGE
 CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR
 561-805-6692
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2014-11-28 Cont ID  
Sent By tklarge Date 2014-11-28 Time 07:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tklarge Date 2014-11-28 Time 06:23 Sent To  
Notes
2014-11-28 07:20:271) THE DOOR IN THE WOMEN'S AND MEN'S RESTROOM APPEARS
 TO BE SWINGING INTO THE CLEAR FLOOR SPACE REQUIRED FOR
 THE WATER CLOSET AND TOILET. COMPLY W/2010 FL.
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE SEC.603.2.3.
 2) A MINIMUM OF 2 DRINKING FOUNTAINS ARE REQUIRED PER
 THE FAC SEC.211.2.
 3) SHT. A6.00 - TYPICAL RESTROOM DETAIL SHOWS THE DOORS
 SWINGING OUT AND THE ARCHITECTURAL MAND MEP PLANS SHOW
 THE DOORS SWINGING IN. CLARIFY.
 4) AN EMERGENCY EYE WASH SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE
 WAREHOUSE AREA PER FPC TABLE 403.1.
 5) THE BREAK ROOM SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE OCCUPANT
 LOAD CALCULATION AS THIS IS AN OCCUPIABLE AREA PER THE
 FBC SEC.202.
 6) SUBMIT MANUF, SPEC/INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE
 INSTANTANEOUS WATER HEATER. WPB AMEND. TO 2010 FBC SEC.
 107.2.1.
 7) SHT. P2 - NOTE #1 STATES "REFER TO CIVIL FOR
 CONTINUATION" BUT THERE ARE NO CIVIL DRAWINGS IN THE
 PLAN SET. CLARIFY.
 8) A BACKFLOW PREVENTER SHALL BE PLACED AT THE METER
 PER CITY ORDINANCE SEC. 90-33 AND THE CITY'S CROSS
 CONNECTION MANUAL.
  
 PLUMBING PLAN REVIEW
 TIM LARGE
 CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR
 561-805-6692
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2015-05-13 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2015-05-13 Time 14:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2015-05-08 Time 16:10 Sent To  
Notes
2015-05-13 14:48:30ZONING PLAN REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 05.13.2015
 PERMIT NO.: 14110863
 ADDRESS: 5483 LEEPER DRIVE
 CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: ROSE KENNEY
 TELEPHONE NO.: 561.662.1819
 SCOPE OF REVIEW: NEW METAL WAREHOUSE BUILDING.
 ___________________________________________
  
 REVIEW STATUS: PASSED WITH PROVISOS
 ___________________________________________
  
 THIS REVIEW HAS BEEN PASSED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
 PROVISOS:
  
 1. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
 (CO):
  
  A. A MINOR PD AMENDMENT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION, TO
 AMEND THE SITE PLAN AND ELEVATIONS TO REFLECT THE
 CURRENT PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT. ADDITIONALLY, A
 REVISION TO PERMIT #14110863 SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE
 BUILDING DIVISION TO AMEND THE SITE PLAN SO THAT IT IS
 CONSISTENT WITH THE PROPOSED ELEVATIONS.
  
  B. ALL LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE LEEPER DRIVE MEDIANS
 SHALL BE REPLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ADOPTED
 LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED FOR THE COMMON AREAS, DATED
 APRIL 21, 2004.
  
 2. ALL SIGNAGE SHALL BE REVIEWED AND INSTALLED UNDER
 SEPARATE PERMITS.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 F: 561.822.1460
  
 E: [email protected]
  
 WWW.WPB.ORG
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2015-03-24 Cont ID  
Sent By JROACH Date 2015-03-24 Time 13:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2015-03-24 Time 13:07 Sent To  
Notes
2015-03-24 13:14:27ZONING PLAN REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 03.24.2015
 PERMIT NO.: 14110863
 ADDRESS: 5483 LEEPER DRIVE
 CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: ROSE KENNEY
 TELEPHONE NO.: 561.662.1819
 SCOPE OF REVIEW: NEW METAL WAREHOUSE BUILDING.
 ___________________________________________
  
 REVIEW STATUS: FAILED
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. ALL NEW PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT, NEW CONSTRUCTION,
 RENOVATION OR REMODELING, WHERE TOTAL VERTICAL
 CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF ALL BUILDINGS ON A PROJECT SITE
 ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN $500,000.00, IS SUBJECT TO
 THE ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED IN
 CHAPTER 78, ARTICLE V OF THE CITY?S CODE OF ORDINANCES.
  
 2. THE DATA TABLE IN THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS; THERE IS DISCREPANCY IN
 THE PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT. THE SITE PLAN APPROVED
 THROUGH THE FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS HAD A T.O.
 ROOF HEIGHT OF 42 FEET 3.75 INCHES....THE NEW
 ELEVATIONS HAVE 43 FEET 3 INCHES. IF CHANGES ARE BEING
 MADE FROM THE PLANS THAT WERE APPROVED THROUGHT THE
 FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, A MINOR PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE
 PLANNING DIVISION. ADDITIONALLY, ALL PLANS SHALL BE
 CONSISTENT IN THEIR DATA.
  
 3. SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR
 SIGNAGE (WALL-MOUNTED AND/OR FREESTANDING), IRRIGATION,
 AND LANDSCAPING. THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL
 INCLUDE A CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE FOR MATERIALS +
 LABOR.
  
 4. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
 (CO), ALL LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE LEEPER DRIVE MEDIAN(S)
 SHALL BE REPLACED.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 PHONE: 561.822.1448
 FAX: 561.822.1460
  
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 WWW.WPB.ORG
  
 12/1/14
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2015-01-15 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2015-01-15 Time 15:00 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2015-01-13 Time 16:42 Sent To  
Notes
2015-01-15 15:07:28ZONING PLAN REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 01.15.2014
 PERMIT NO.: 14110863
 ADDRESS: 5483 LEEPER DRIVE
 CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: ROSE KENNEY
 TELEPHONE NO.: 561.662.1819
 SCOPE OF REVIEW: NEW METAL WAREHOUSE BUILDING.
 ___________________________________________
  
 REVIEW STATUS: FAILED
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. ALL NEW PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT, NEW CONSTRUCTION,
 RENOVATION OR REMODELING, WHERE TOTAL VERTICAL
 CONSTRUCTION COSTS OF ALL BUILDINGS ON A PROJECT SITE
 ARE EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN $500,000.00, IS SUBJECT TO
 THE ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED IN
 CHAPTER 78, ARTICLE V OF THE CITY?S CODE OF ORDINANCES.
  
 2. THE DATA TABLE IN THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS; THERE IS DISCREPANCY IN
 THE PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT. THE SITE PLAN APPROVED
 THROUGH THE FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS HAD A
 REVISION DATE OF DECEMBER 2, 2014.
  
 3. SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR
 SIGNAGE (WALL-MOUNTED AND/OR FREESTANDING), IRRIGATION,
 AND LANDSCAPING. THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL
 INCLUDE A CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE FOR MATERIALS +
 LABOR.
  
 4. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
 (CO), ALL LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE LEEPER DRIVE MEDIAN(S)
 SHALL BE REPLACED.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 PHONE: 561.822.1448
 FAX: 561.822.1460
  
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 WWW.WPB.ORG
  
2014-12-01 11:45:4812/1/14


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved