| Plan Review Stops For Permit 14110720 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-12-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-29 |
Time |
15:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-29 |
Time |
15:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-12-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-20 |
Time |
10:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-20 |
Time |
10:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-12-20 10:17:10 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | PLEASE HAVE THE QUALIFIER CALL ME. THE INSTALLATION | | | SCHEDULE MAY BE REDLINED FOR ISSUANCE (2ND REQUEST). | | | | | | PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM REVIEWS 2 AND 4. THE SAME | | | INSTALLATION SCHEDULE WAS SUBMITTED EXCEPT THAT THE | | | COLUMN "SHUTTER INSTALLED VERTICAL/HORIZONTAL" WAS | | | CHANGED FROM "V" TO "H". THIS IS NOT CORRECT - | | | ACCORDION SHUTTERS ARE INSTALLED VERTICALLY. | | | | | | SINCE THE SAME INSTALLATION SCHEDULE WAS SUBMITTED, THE | | | SAME COMMENTS APPLY. PLEASE HAVE THE QUALIFIER CONTACT | | | ME. DO NOT RESUBMIT THE SAME DOCUMENTS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-12-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-18 |
Time |
07:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-18 |
Time |
07:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-12-18 07:31:31 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | PLEASE HAVE THE QUALIFIER CALL ME. THE INSTALLATION | | | SCHEDULE MAY BE REDLINED FOR ISSUANCE. | | | | | | RESUBMITTAL SHEET STATES THAT "A DATED BUT OTHERWISE | | | UNCHANGED INSTALLATION SCHEDULE ARE ATTACHED." THIS | | | INSTALLATION SCHEDULE HAD COMMENTS, SEE REVIEW #2. | | | | | | TO RECAP - REVIEW 1 DID NOT INCLUDE AN INSTALLATION | | | SCHEDULE. | | | | | | REVIEW 2 - INSTALLATION SCHEDULE SUBMITTED BUT HAD | | | CORRECTIONS. | | | | | | REVIEW 3 - A MARKED PRODUCT APPROVAL WAS SUBMITTED, BUT | | | A NEW INSTALLATION SCHEDULE WAS NOT PROVIDED. | | | | | | REVIEW 4 - THE SAME INSTALLATION SCHEDULE AS REVIEW 2 | | | WAS SUBMITTED. | | | | | | AS EXPEDITED PLAN REVIEW HAS BEEN REQUESTED, IT APPEARS | | | THAT THERE IS SOME URGENCY FOR THIS PROJECT. PLEASE | | | HAVE THE QUALIFIER CONTACT ME IF HE WOULD LIKE TO | | | DISCUSS A REDLINED PLAN FOR ISSUANCE. IF THE QUALIFIER | | | DOES NOT WISH TO CALL ME, PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM | | | REVIEW #2 AND REVISE THE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE | | | ACCORDINGLY AND RESUBMIT. | | | | | | FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE, COMMENTS FROM REVIEW #2 ARE: | | | | | | | | | 1. FBC 2010 RESIDENTIAL 301, FASTENING PROPOSED DOES | | | NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | | | "SHUTTER CONNECTION MOUNTING TYPE" COLUMN ON THE | | | INSTALLATION SCHEDULE SHOULD CORRELATE WITH THE NAMING | | | CONVENTION IN THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. SEE SHEETS 14 AND | | | 15. "WALL MOUNT" IS PROPOSED. ON SHEETS 14 AND 15, | | | CONNECTION TYPES "H" AND "K" ARE CIRCLED. PLEASE REVISE | | | THIS COLUMN TO CORRELATE WITH THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 2. CONNECTION TYPE K IS A FLOOR MOUNT AND REQUIRES A | | | CONCRETE SUBSTRATE. "CONCRETE BLOCK" IS STATED AS THE | | | SUBSTRATE ON THE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. A FLOOR IS | | | TYPICALLY FORMED AND POURED CONCRETE. PLEASE CLARIFY, | | | OR REVISE EITHER CONNECTION TYPE AND/OR SUBSTRATE. | | | | | | 3. THE ITEMS CIRCLED ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL APPEAR TO | | | INDICATE CONNECTION TYPE "H" WITH 10" SPACING CIRCLED | | | AT THE TOP, BUT THIS IS A FLOOR CONNECTION (CAN ONLY BE | | | USED AT THE FLOOR). | | | | | | "K" IS ALSO CIRCLED WITH 7" SPACING, APPEARS TO BE THE | | | BOTTOM CONNECTION TYPE, SEE ITEM 2 REGARDING SUBSTRATE. | | | | | | PROPOSED INSTALLATION IS NOT CLEAR; COMPLIANCE CANNOT | | | BE DETERMINED. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-12-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-12 |
Time |
07:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-12 |
Time |
07:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-12-12 07:38:57 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 RESIDENTIAL | | | | | | COMMENT FROM PLAN REVIEW #1: | | | | | | 1. COMPLETE THE SAMPLE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE OR PROVIDE | | | ALL INFORMATION TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE IN ANOTHER | | | FORMAT, FBC*106, FBC R301, FBC1609. TWO SETS REQUIRED. | | | THIS FORM IS AVAILABLE IN THE LOBBY OR ON THE INTERNET | | | AT | | | | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEVELOPMENT/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/SITES/33/ | | | 2013/09/SCHEDULE_FOR_INSTALLATION.PDF | | | | | | PLAN REVIEW #1 DID NOT INCLUDE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. | | | | | | PLAN REVIEW #2 INCLUDED AN INSTALLATION SCHEDULE BUT | | | DID NOT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PRODUCT | | | APPROVAL. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW (PLAN REVIEW #3) INCLUDES A NEW MARKED | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL BUT A NEW INSTALLATION SCHEDULE WAS | | | NOT PROVIDED. THE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE IS REQUIRED FOR | | | BOTH PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTIONS. PLEASE COMPLETE A NEW | | | INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. INCLUDE A DATE ON THE | | | INSTALLATION SCHEDULE,. | | | | | | 2. WHEN RESUBMITTING, PROVIDE TWO COMPLETE COLLATED | | | SETS OF DOCUMENTS FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. MARK OLD SHEETS | | | "VOID." | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-12-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-04 |
Time |
18:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-04 |
Time |
18:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-12-04 18:37:49 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 RESIDENTIAL | | | | | | | | | 1. FBC 2010 RESIDENTIAL 301, FASTENING PROPOSED DOES | | | NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | | | "SHUTTER CONNECTION MOUNTING TYPE" COLUMN ON THE | | | INSTALLATION SCHEDULE SHOULD CORRELATE WITH THE NAMING | | | CONVENTION IN THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. SEE SHEETS 14 AND | | | 15. "WALL MOUNT" IS PROPOSED. ON SHEETS 14 AND 15, | | | CONNECTION TYPES "H" AND "K" ARE CIRCLED. PLEASE REVISE | | | THIS COLUMN TO CORRELATE WITH THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 2. CONNECTION TYPE K IS A FLOOR MOUNT AND REQUIRES A | | | CONCRETE SUBSTRATE. "CONCRETE BLOCK" IS STATED AS THE | | | SUBSTRATE ON THE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. A FLOOR IS | | | TYPICALLY FORMED AND POURED CONCRETE. PLEASE CLARIFY, | | | OR REVISE EITHER CONNECTION TYPE AND/OR SUBSTRATE. | | | | | | 3. THE ITEMS CIRCLED ON THE PRODUCT APPROVAL APPEAR TO | | | INDICATE CONNECTION TYPE "H" WITH 10" SPACING CIRCLED | | | AT THE TOP, BUT THIS IS A FLOOR CONNECTION (CAN ONLY BE | | | USED AT THE FLOOR). | | | | | | "K" IS ALSO CIRCLED WITH 7" SPACING, APPEARS TO BE THE | | | BOTTOM CONNECTION TYPE, SEE ITEM 2 REGARDING SUBSTRATE. | | | | | | PROPOSED INSTALLATION IS NOT CLEAR; COMPLIANCE CANNOT | | | BE DETERMINED. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-12-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-01 |
Time |
14:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-01 |
Time |
14:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-12-01 14:04:32 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 RESIDENTIAL | | | | | | | | | 1. COMPLETE THE SAMPLE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE OR PROVIDE | | | ALL INFORMATION TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE IN ANOTHER | | | FORMAT, FBC*106, FBC R301, FBC1609. TWO SETS REQUIRED. | | | THIS FORM IS AVAILABLE IN THE LOBBY OR ON THE INTERNET | | | AT | | | | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEVELOPMENT/WP-CONTENT/UPLOADS/SITES/33/ | | | 2013/09/SCHEDULE_FOR_INSTALLATION.PDF | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-12-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-29 |
Time |
15:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-29 |
Time |
15:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-12-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-20 |
Time |
10:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-19 |
Time |
10:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-12-20 10:11:05 | ****EXPEDITED**** | | | | | | TO SH DESK | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-12-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-18 |
Time |
07:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-17 |
Time |
16:01 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2014-12-17 16:02:09 | TO S.HILLS DESK |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-12-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-12 |
Time |
07:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-11 |
Time |
16:29 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-12-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-04 |
Time |
18:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-03 |
Time |
18:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-12-03 18:41:53 | SENT TO SAMANTHA HILL FOR REVIEW. JG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-12-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-01 |
Time |
14:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2014-11-19 |
Time |
12:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-11-19 12:36:35 | ROUTED TO BUILDING $5000 & UNDER |
|
|
