|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 14090353
| Plan Review Stops For Permit 14090353 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-12-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-30 |
Time |
08:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-30 |
Time |
08:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-12-30 08:15:36 | ****PROVISO**** | | | ****REVISION REQUIRED PRIOR TO FIRST INSPECTION**** | | | | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | SAME PLAN (SIGNED & SEALED ON 9/5/14) WAS SUBMITTED; | | | THEREFORE, REVIEW PASSED WITH PROVISO, REVISION | | | REQUIRED TO ADDRESS PREVIOUS COMMENT: | | | | | | 1. FASTENING PROPOSED SHOULD BE SPECIFIC: FASTENER | | | TYPE, LENGTH OR MINIMUM EMBEDMENT, DIAMETER, MINIMUM | | | NUMBER, FBC 1609. REVISE PLAN TO BE LESS VAGUE - | | | "1/4-20 THROUGH BOLT APPROPRIATE FOR WEIGHT AND | | | SURFACE." | | | | | | ALTHOUGH A THROUGH BOLT WAS SPECIFIED, GRAPHICALLY IT | | | WAS NOT SHOWN AS EXTENDING THROUGH THE ENTIRE | | | SUBSTRATE, SO THE BOLT WOULD THEREFORE REQUIRE A | | | LENGTH. | | | | | | ALTERNATES (SCREWS, TOGGLE BOLTS) DID NOT INCLUDE | | | LENGTH. | | | | | | REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE FASTENER INFORMATION. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-10-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2014-10-14 |
Time |
18:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2014-10-14 |
Time |
18:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-10-14 18:30:20 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. FASTENING PROPOSED SHOULD BE SPECIFIC: FASTENER | | | TYPE, LENGTH OR MINIMUM EMBEDMENT, DIAMETER, MINIMUM | | | NUMBER, FBC 1609. REVISE PLAN TO BE LESS VAGUE - | | | "1/4-20 THROUGH BOLT APPROPRIATE FOR WEIGHT AND | | | SURFACE." | | | | | | ALTHOUGH A THROUGH BOLT WAS SPECIFIED, GRAPHICALLY IT | | | WAS NOT SHOWN AS EXTENDING THROUGH THE ENTIRE | | | SUBSTRATE, SO THE BOLT WOULD THEREFORE REQUIRE A | | | LENGTH. | | | | | | WHAT DOES "APPROPRIATE FOR WEIGHT AND SURFACE" MEAN? | | | SHOULDN'T THE ENGINEER SPECIFY THE FASTENER BASED ON | | | JOB CONDITIONS? THIS ENGINEER'S PLANS ARE NOT NORMALLY | | | THIS VAGUE. | | | | | | ALTERNATES (SCREWS, TOGGLE BOLTS) DID NOT INCLUDE | | | LENGTH. | | | | | | REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE REQUESTED INFORMATION. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-10-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
sciard |
Date |
2014-10-14 |
Time |
13:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
sciard |
Date |
2014-10-14 |
Time |
13:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-12-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-30 |
Time |
08:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2014-12-01 |
Time |
18:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-12-01 18:24:51 | SENT TO ZONING. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-10-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2014-10-14 |
Time |
18:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2014-09-10 |
Time |
17:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-09-10 17:52:13 | ROUTED TO ZONING |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-12-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2014-12-29 |
Time |
17:21 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2014-12-29 |
Time |
17:21 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2014-12-29 17:26:55 | PERMITTED - 33.75 SQ. FT (27 SQ. FT. + 25% CITYPLACE | | | ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE) | | | PROPOSED - 29.1 SQ. FT. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-10-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2014-10-06 |
Time |
10:28 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2014-10-06 |
Time |
10:28 |
Sent To |
E |
|
| Notes |
| 2014-10-06 10:48:34 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) THE TWO INTERIOR ARCADE WALL SIGNS REQUESTED FOR | | | THIS BAY EXCEED THE PERMITTED SIGN AREA PERMITTED BY | | | THE CITYPLACE MASTER SIGN PLAN. | | | | | | PERMITTED - 27 SQ. FT. | | | PROPOSED - 29.1 SQ. FT. | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT CITYPLACE MAY APPROVE, IN WRITING, A | | | VARIANCE TO INCREASE IN THE SIGN SQUARE FOOTAGE BY UP | | | TO 25 PERCENT (TO 33.75 SQ. FT), WHICH WOULD PERMIT | | | 29.1 SQ. FT. OF INTERIOR ARCADE WALL SIGNAGE. | | | | | | 2) A COPY OF THE REVIEW HAS BEEN SENT TO CARLOS BERNAL | | | AT CITYPLACE. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. | | | |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
|
