Plan Review Stops For Permit 14060946 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-02-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-02-09 |
Time |
11:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-02-09 |
Time |
11:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-02-09 13:18:29 | APPROVED WITH EXCEPTIONS. REVISIONS REQUIRED. | | | | 1) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE | | EXTERIOR DOOR AND WINDOWS IN THE ADDITION THAT HAVE | | BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD ( | | RICHARD BOYETTE ). DCA RULE 9N-3 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-01-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-01-07 |
Time |
11:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-01-07 |
Time |
07:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-01-07 11:14:15 | PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS | | | | 3RD REVIEW: FBC 2010 | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | (561) 805-6714 | | [email protected] | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: | | | | 1) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF A SURVEY AND SITE PLAN. SHOW | | LOCATIONS OF A STRUCTURES AND DISTANCES TO PROPERTY | | LINES. FBC 107.2.1.3 | | | | 2) FBC-R 301.1 BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES, AND ALL PARTS | | THEREOF, SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAFELY SUPPORT ALL | | LOADS, INCLUDING DEAD LOADS, LIVE LOADS, ROOF LOADS, | | FLOOD LOADS, AND WIND LOADS AS PRESCRIBED BY THIS CODE. | | THE CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE SHALL | | RESULT IN A SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES A COMPLETE LOAD PATH | | THAT MEETS ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE TRANSFER OF ALL | | LOADS FROM THEIR POINT OF ORIGIN THROUGH THE | | LOAD-RESISTING ELEMENTS TO THE FOUNDATION. THE OPENING | | FRAMING DETAIL 1 ON SHEET 2 DOES NOT SPECIFY THE | | CONNECTORS FOR THE CRIPPLES BETWEEN THE HEADER AND THE | | TOP PLATE. | | | | 3) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF STATE OR MIAMI-DADE PRODUCT | | APPROVALS FOR THE TRUSS ANCHORS, STRAPS AND CONNECTORS | | AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9N-3. ALTERNATELY, THEY CAN BE | | LISTED ON THE PLANS IN AN ANCHOR SCHEDULE WITH THEIR | | FL# OR NOA NUMBER. | | | | 4) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED | | AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. CITY | | AMENDMENTS 107.3.4.1 THE PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT WERE | | SUBMITTED WERE APPROVED BY STEPHEN A. GAYDOSH WHO IS | | NOT THE DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR THIS PROJECT. RICHARD | | BOYETTE IS THE DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR THIS PROJECT. | | | | 5) THE VALUE FOR THE WORK IS SPECIFIED AS $8500.00, | | WHICH APPEARS TO BE LOW. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF THE | | SIGNED CONTRACT. CITY AMENDMENTS 109.3 | | | | 6) PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED FOR ASPHALT ROOF | | SINGLES AND A SECTIONAL GARAGE DOOR, HOWEVER, NO | | ROOFING WORK OR GARAGE DOOR WAS INDICATED ON THE PLANS. | | PLEASE REMOVE ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE NOT PART OF | | THIS PROJECT. FBC 107.2.1 | | | | 7) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME AND CLARIFY THE | | SCOPE OF THE PROJECT, PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER | | INDICATING HOW EACH REVIEW COMMENT HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-10-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-10-11 |
Time |
11:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-10-11 |
Time |
07:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2014-10-11 10:11:48 | 2010 FBC | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | 1) TWO SETS OF NEW PLANS THAT ARE DIFFERENT FROM THE | | ORIGINAL ONES, WITH A DIFFERENT SCOPE OF WORK AND A | | DIFFERENT DESIGN PROFESSIONAL (ENGINEER) WERE | | SUBMITTED. PLEASE CLARIFY THE INTENT OF THIS SUBMITTAL. | | IF THE WORK THAT WAS SPECIFIED ON THE PERMIT | | APPLICATION AND SHOWN ON THE FIRST SET OF DRAWINGS IS | | TO BE DONE, THEN SUBMIT PLANS FROM THE NEW DESIGNER OF | | RECORD THAT CLEARLY SHOWS THE TOTAL SCOPE OF THE | | PROPOSED WORK. INCLUDE THE STRUCTURAL REPAIR DETAILS, | | THE ADDITION AND THE NEW EXTERIOR DOORS & WINDOWS. | | | | 2) THIS STRUCTURE'S FOOT PRINT AND LIVING AREA SQUARE | | FOOTAGE (420 SQFT) IN THE PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY | | APPRAISER'S RECORDS DOES NOT MATCH WHAT IS SPECIFIED ON | | THE PLANS (1080 SQFT). THE CITY DOES NOT HAVE ANY | | RECORD OF THIS ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE BEING ADDED. | | UPON COMPARISON IT APPEARS THAT THE UNFINISHED CARPORT | | AND STORAGE ROOM HAVE BEEN CONVERTED TO LIVING SPACE. | | THE PLANS WILL NEED TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE. FBC 107.2 | | | | 3) PROVIDE DIMENSIONS OF THE STRUCTURE AND THE ROOMS ON | | THE PLANS. FBC 107.2.1 | | | | 4) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF A SURVEY AND SITE PLAN. SHOW | | LOCATIONS OF A STRUCTURES AND DISTANCES TO PROPERTY | | LINES. FBC 107.2.1.3 | | | | 5) THE ENERGY CALCULATION FORM IS REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED | | AND DATED BY THE OWNER/AGENT PER FBC ENERGY SECTION | | 103. | | | | 6) INDICATE ALL NEW OR REPLACED WINDOWS AND DOORS ON | | THE PLANS AND SPECIFY THEIR TYPES AND SIZES. CITY | | AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 | | | | 7) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF STATE OR MIAMI-DADE PRODUCT | | APPROVALS FOR THE TRUSS ANCHORS, STRAPS AND CONNECTORS | | AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9N-3. ALTERNATELY, THEY CAN BE | | LISTED ON THE PLANS IN AN ANCHOR SCHEDULE WITH THEIR | | FL# OR NOA NUMBER. | | | | 8) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED | | AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. CITY | | AMENDMENTS 107.3.4.1 | | | | 9) THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF +62.9 PSF AND -68.3 PSF FOR | | THE WINDOWS AND DOORS SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS APPEAR TO | | BE HIGH FOR THIS STRUCTURE LOCATED IN EXPOSURE C WITH A | | 170 VULT WINDSPEED. THIS COULD REQUIRE PRODUCT | | APPROVALS WITH HIGHER DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE DOORS | | AND WINDOWS. FBC R301.2.1 | | | | 10) THE 2007 EDITION OF THE EXISTING BUILDING CODE IS | | INCORRECTLY SPECIFIED. THE 2010 FBC EXISTING BUILDING | | IS THE ONE THAT APPLIES. | | | | 11) THE SCOPE OF WORK STATES TO BRING THE MAIN HOUSE UP | | TO THE 2010 NEC. THE 2008 NEC IS THE CORRECT REFERENCE. | | 2010 FBC-R CHAPTER 43. | | | | 12) THE VALUE FOR THE WORK IS SPECIFIED AS $8500.00, | | WHICH APPEARS TO BE LOW. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF THE | | SIGNED CONTRACT. CITY AMENDMENTS 109.3 | | | | 13) AN IMPACT FEE REVIEW BY PALM BEACH COUNTY WILL BE | | REQUIRED FOR THE AREA THAT WAS CONVERTED TO LIVING | | SPACE. | | | | 14) PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED FOR ASPHALT ROOF | | SINGLES, HOWEVER ROOFING WAS NOT INDICATED ON THE | | PLANS. PLEASE CLARIFY. FBC 107.2.1 | | | | 15) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME AND CLARIFY THE | | SCOPE OF THE PROJECT, PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER | | INDICATING HOW EACH REVIEW COMMENT HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | (561)805-6714 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-07-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-07-14 |
Time |
08:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-07-12 |
Time |
09:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2014-07-12 12:22:19 | 2010 FBC | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | 1) SUBMIT TWO SETS OF ENERGY COMPLIANCE FORMS FOR THE | | ENCLOSED PORCH AS REQUIRED BY FBC ENERGY SECTION 103. | | | | 2) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE | | WINDOWS AT THE ENCLOSED PORCH, BATHROOM AND AT THE | | KITCHEN. DCA RULE 9N-3 | | | | 3) SPECIFY THE WINDOW TYPES AND SIZES ON THE PLANS. | | CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 | | | | 4) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE TRUSS | | ANCHORS, STRAPS AND CONNECTORS AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE | | 9N-3. | | | | 5) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED | | AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. CITY | | AMENDMENTS 107.3.4.1 | | | | 6) THE NEW WINDOWS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE IMPACT | | PROTECTION PER FBCR301.2.1.2. | | | | 7) THE VALUE FOR THE WORK IS SPECIFIED AS $8500.00, | | WHICH APPEARS TO BE LOW. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF THE | | SIGNED CONTRACT. CITY AMENDMENTS 109.3 | | | | 8) AN IMPACT FEE REVIEW BY PALM BEACH COUNTY WILL BE | | REQUIRED. | | | | 9) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME, PLEASE SUBMIT A | | RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH REVIEW COMMENT HAS | | BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | (561)805-6714 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-01-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-01-07 |
Time |
08:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dhayes |
Date |
2015-01-07 |
Time |
07:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-01-07 08:54:03 | 1/7/2015 | | PROJECT: MESTON RESIDENCE REMODEL | | PERMIT#: 14060946 | | CODE: 2008 EDITION OF THE NEC, 2010 EDITION OF THE FBC | | ,2010 WPB AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC, CHAPTER 1, | | ADMINISTRATION, 2012 FBC SUPPLEMENTS. | | 3RD ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | ACTION: APPROVED WITH EXCEPTION | | | | 1) VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE NEC 210.8 AND | | 210.11(C)(3) THAT REQUIRES AT LEAST ONE 20AMP GFCI | | BRANCH CIRCUIT FOR THE BATHROOM. | | | | 2) VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH 408.4 REVISE THE PANEL | | SCHEDULE TO IDENTIFY EVERY CIRCUIT AND CIRCUIT | | MODIFICATION AS TO ITS CLEAR, EVIDENT, AND SPECIFIC | | PURPOSE OR USE. NEC 408.4 | | | | 3) VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH NEC 110.58 A DISCONNECT IS | | REQUIRED WITHIN SIGHT OF THE IRRIGATION PUMP. | | | | DAVID HAYES, ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER, PX3421, | | 561-805-6717 OR [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-10-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-10-11 |
Time |
09:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-10-11 |
Time |
07:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2014-10-11 09:28:47 | 2010 FBC / 2008 NEC | | | | DENIED BY ELECTRIC | | | | 1) FBC- 107.3.5.3 - PROVIDE AN ELECTRIC SERVICE RISER | | DIAGRAM WITH WIRE SIZES, CONDUIT DETAIL AND GROUNDING | | DETAIL. | | | | 2) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH NEC 250.50 WHICH REQUIRES ALL | | ELECTRODES THAT ARE PRESENT TO BE BONDED. | | | | 3) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH NEC 250.94 FOR INTER-SYSTEM | | BONDING. | | | | 4) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH NEC 210.52 FOR RECEPTACLE | | OUTLET SPACING. THE RECEPTACLE SPACING IN THE DEN NEEDS | | TO BE SUCH THAT NO POINT MEASURED HORIZONTALLY ALONG | | THE FLOOR LINE IN ANY WALL SPACE IS MORE THAN 6 FEET | | FROM A RECEPTACLE. | | | | 5) NEC 210.12 (B) - OUTLETS TO BE AFCI PROTECTED. | | | | 6) NEC 406.11 - TAMPER-RESISTANT RECEPTACLES ARE | | REQUIRED. | | | | 7) NEC 250.56 - SERVICE GROUNDING ELECTRODE TO BE | | AUGMENTED BY AN ADDITIONAL ELECTRODE 6 FEET AWAY OR | | PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF RESISTANCE TO GROUND OF 25 OHMS OR | | LESS. | | | | 8) NEC 110.9 - SPECIFY THE A.I.C. RATING OF THE | | ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT ON THE PLANS. | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | (561)805-6714 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-07-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-07-14 |
Time |
07:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-07-14 |
Time |
06:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2014-07-14 07:01:57 | 2010 FBC / 2008 NEC | | | | DENIED BY ELECTRIC | | | | 1) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBCR 314.3.1. WHEN ALTERATIONS, | | REPAIRS OR ADDITIONS REQUIRING A PERMIT OCCUR, THE | | DWELLING SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH SMOKE ALARMS AS | | REQUIRED FOR NEW DWELLINGS. | | | | 2) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH NEC 250.50 WHICH REQUIRES ALL | | ELECTRODES THAT ARE PRESENT TO BE BONDED. | | | | 3) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH NEC 250.94 FOR INTER-SYSTEM | | BONDING. | | | | 4) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH NEC 210.52 FOR RECEPTACLE | | OUTLET SPACING. THE WALL SPACES THAT ARE 2 FT OR MORE | | IN WIDTH BETWEEN THE DOORS IN THE MASTER BEDROOM AND | | BEDROOM #2 ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A RECEPTACLE. ALSO THE | | RECEPTACLE SPACING IN THE NEW FAMILY ROOM NEEDS TO BE | | SUCH THAT NO POINT MEASURED HORIZONTALLY ALONG THE | | FLOOR LINE IN ANY WALL SPACE IS MORE THAN 6 FEET FROM A | | RECEPTACLE. | | | | 5) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH NEC 210.52 (E)(1) WHICH | | REQUIRES A RECEPTACLE AT THE FRONT AND REAR OF THE | | DWELLING. | | | | 6) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH NEC 210.63 FOR THE REQUIRED | | HEATING AND A/C RECEPTACLE FOR THE SERVICING OF THE A/C | | CONDENSING UNIT AT THE EXTERIOR OF THE DWELLING. | | | | 7) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH NEC 210.8(B) FOR GROUND FAULT | | CIRCUIT- INTERRUPTER PROTECTION FOR OUTDOOR RECEPTACLES | | AND NEC 406.8 FOR WEATHER PROTECTION OF RECEPTACLES IN | | WET LOCATIONS. | | | | 8) THE NAME AND SIGNATURE OF THE PERSON THAT IS | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN IS REQUIRED ON THE | | ELECTRICAL PLANS. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | (561)805-6714 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-02-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-02-09 |
Time |
11:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-02-05 |
Time |
18:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-02-05 18:31:01 | SENT TO ZONING |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-01-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-01-07 |
Time |
13:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-10-23 |
Time |
14:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-10-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-10-11 |
Time |
11:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-09-30 |
Time |
12:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2014-10-01 12:23:44 | TO ZONING. |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-07-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-07-14 |
Time |
08:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-06-23 |
Time |
11:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-01-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-01-07 |
Time |
07:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-01-07 |
Time |
07:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-07-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-07-12 |
Time |
10:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-07-12 |
Time |
10:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2014-07-12 10:04:16 | BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT CAN BE | | ISSUED, IMPACT FEES MUST BE PAID TO | | PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE PLANS MUST BE | | STAMPED AND THE RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE | | APPLICATION. 233-5025 |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2015-02-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-02-09 |
Time |
11:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-02-09 |
Time |
11:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-02-09 11:29:03 | PLANS SPECIFY THAT ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS EXISTING | | AND WILL REMAIN. A SEPARATE APPLICATION, PERMIT AND | | REVIEW IS REQUIRED FOR ANY MECHANICAL WORK. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2015-01-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-01-07 |
Time |
09:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2015-01-07 |
Time |
07:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2015-01-07 10:07:39 | PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS | | | | | | 3RD REVIEW: FBC 2010 | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | (561) 805-6714 | | [email protected] | | | | MECHANICAL | | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: | | | | 1) THERE ARE HVAC LOAD CALCULATIONS IN THIS SUBMITTAL | | AND THE DRAWINGS INDICATE THAT THERE IS AN EXISTING | | HVAC SYSTEM. PLEASE CLARIFY. FBC 107.2.1 | | | | 2) THE TOTAL COOLING AND HEATING BTUH ON THE ENERGY | | CALULATION FORM DOES NOT MATCH THE HEATING AND COOLING | | BTUH LISTED ON THE ENERGY FORM 405-10. | | | | 3) FBC -107.3.5.1.4 MECHANICAL MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW | | CRITERIA: SHOW, EXHAUST SYSTEMS, CLOTHES DRYER EXHAUST, | | KITCHEN EQUIPMENT EXHAUST, SPECIALTY EXHAUST SYSTEMS, | | EQUIPMENT, EQUIPMENT LOCATION, MAKE-UP AIR, | | ROOF-MOUNTED EQUIPMENT, DUCT SYSTEMS, VENTILATION, | | COMBUSTION AIR, CHIMNEYS, FIREPLACES AND VENTS, | | APPLIANCES, BOILERS, REFRIGERATION, BATHROOM | | VENTILATION, LABORATORY, DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION. | | PROVIDE TWO SETS OF MECHANICAL PLANS THAT SHOW ANY NEW | | MECHANICAL WORK OR DUCTWORK THAT IS BEING DONE, | | INCLUDING THE NEW DROP THAT IS REQUIRED TO SUPPLY HEAT | | TO THE NEW FAMILY ROOM PER FBC-R303.8 . | | | | 4) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIMES AND PROVIDE | | CLARIFICATION, PLEASE SUBMIT A RESPONSE LETTER | | INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW COMMENTS HAS BEEN | | ADDRESSED. FBC 107.2.1.3 | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-10-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-10-11 |
Time |
09:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-10-11 |
Time |
08:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2014-10-11 09:14:27 | PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW: FBC 2010 | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | (561) 805-6714 | | [email protected] | | | | MECHANICAL | | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: | | | | 1) THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL DID NOT INDICATE THAT ANY | | MECHANICAL WORK WAS TO BE DONE. THERE ARE HVAC LOAD | | CALCULATIONS IN THIS SUBMITTAL AND THE NEW DRAWINGS | | INDICATE THAT A NEW HVAC SYSTEM WILL BE INSTALLED. | | PLEASE CLARIFY. FBC 107.2.1 | | | | 2) THE COOLING AND HEATING BTUH ON THE ENERGY | | CALULATION FORM DOES NOT MATCH THE TOTAL HEATING AND | | COOLING | | 3) FBC-R - M1305.1.3 APPLIANCES IN ATTICS. | | ATTICS CONTAINING APPLIANCES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AN | | OPENING AND A CLEAR AND UNOBSTRUCTED PASSAGEWAY LARGE | | ENOUGH TO ALLOW REMOVAL OF THE LARGEST APPLIANCE, BUT | | NOT LESS THAN 30 INCHES (762 MM) HIGH AND 22 INCHES | | (559 MM) WIDE AND NOT MORE THAN 6 FEET (1829 MM) LONG | | MEASURED ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF THE PASSAGEWAY FROM | | THE OPENING TO THE APPLIANCE. THE PASSAGEWAY SHALL HAVE | | CONTINUOUS SOLID FLOORING IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 5 | | NOT LESS THAN 24 INCHES (610 MM) WIDE. A LEVEL SERVICE | | SPACE AT LEAST 30 INCHES (762 MM) DEEP AND 30 INCHES | | (762 MM) WIDE SHALL BE PRESENT ALONG ALL SIDES OF THE | | APPLIANCE WHERE ACCESS IS REQUIRED. THE CLEAR ACCESS | | OPENING DIMENSIONS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 20 INCHES BY | | 30 INCHES (508 MM BY 762 MM), AND LARGE ENOUGH TO ALLOW | | REMOVAL OF THE LARGEST APPLIANCE. | | | | 4) FBC-R - M1305.1.3.1 ELECTRICAL REQUIREMENTS. | | A LUMINAIRE CONTROLLED BY A SWITCH LOCATED AT THE | | REQUIRED PASSAGEWAY OPENING AND A RECEPTACLE OUTLET | | SHALL BE INSTALLED AT OR NEAR THE APPLIANCE LOCATION IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 34. | | | | 5) FBC-R - M1305.1.3.2 AIR-HANDLING UNITS. | | AIR-HANDLING UNITS SHALL BE ALLOWED IN ATTICS IF THE | | FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE MET: | | 1. THE SERVICE PANEL OF THE EQUIPMENT IS LOCATED WITHIN | | 6 FEET (1829 MM) OF AN ATTIC ACCESS. | | 2. A DEVICE IS INSTALLED TO ALERT THE OWNER OR SHUT THE | | UNIT DOWN WHEN THE CONDENSATION DRAIN IS NOT WORKING | | PROPERLY. | | 3. THE ATTIC ACCESS OPENING IS OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO | | REPLACE THE AIR HANDLER. | | 4. A NOTICE IS POSTED ON THE ELECTRIC SERVICE PANEL | | INDICATING TO THE HOMEOWNER THAT THE AIR HANDLER IS | | LOCATED IN THE ATTIC. SAID NOTICE SHALL BE IN ALL | | CAPITALS, IN 16 POINT TYPE, WITH THE TITLE AND FIRST | | PARAGRAPH IN BOLD: | | | | 6) FBC -107.3.5.1.4 MECHANICAL MINIMUM PLAN REVIEW | | CRITERIA: SHOW, EXHAUST SYSTEMS, CLOTHES DRYER EXHAUST, | | KITCHEN EQUIPMENT EXHAUST, SPECIALTY EXHAUST SYSTEMS, | | EQUIPMENT, EQUIPMENT LOCATION, MAKE-UP AIR, | | ROOF-MOUNTED EQUIPMENT, DUCT SYSTEMS, VENTILATION, | | COMBUSTION AIR, CHIMNEYS, FIREPLACES AND VENTS, | | APPLIANCES, BOILERS, REFRIGERATION, BATHROOM | | VENTILATION, LABORATORY, DESIGN FLOOD ELEVATION. | | | | 7) FBC-R - M 1602.4 PROVIDE BALANCED AIR RETURN AT | | BEDROOMS. | | | | 8) FBC 107.2.1 PROVIDE THE MODEL NUMBERS AND | | SPECIFICATIONS OF THE HEATING AND COOLING EQUIPMENT IN | | AN EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE ON THE MECHANICAL PLAN THAT | | CORRESPONDS WITH THE EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS. | | | | 9) FBC - 107.3.5.3 ? PROVIDE A MECHANICAL PLAN TO SHOW | | SUPPLY DUCTS PER FBC-R M16 & BATH EXHAUST PER FBC-R | | M15. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-07-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-07-12 |
Time |
10:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-07-12 |
Time |
10:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2014-07-12 10:44:39 | NO MECHANICAL PLANS WERE SUBMITTED. A SEPARATE PERMIT, | | APPLICATION AND REVIEW IS REQUIRED FOR MECHANICAL. |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2015-01-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-01-06 |
Time |
11:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
tklarge |
Date |
2015-01-06 |
Time |
11:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-10-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-10-11 |
Time |
11:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-10-11 |
Time |
11:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2014-10-11 11:31:24 | 2010 FBC | | | | PLUMBING | | | | 1) NO PLUMBING WORK IS SHOWN ON THE NEW DRAWING. SUBMIT | | TWO SETS OF A PLUMBING RISER DIAGRAM ON THE PLANS. | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | (561)805-6714 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2014-07-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-07-12 |
Time |
10:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-07-12 |
Time |
08:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
R |
ROOF PLAN REVIEW |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2014-07-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-07-12 |
Time |
10:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2014-07-12 |
Time |
10:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2014-07-12 10:32:55 | NO ROOFING WORK SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND NO PRODUCT | | APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
|
Date |
2015-02-06 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
|
Date |
2015-02-06 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-12-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
sgraham |
Date |
2014-12-05 |
Time |
15:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
sgraham |
Date |
2014-12-05 |
Time |
15:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2014-12-05 15:44:58 | 12/5/14 ZONING FAILED 3RD CHECKLIST | | | | 1. PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF AN UP TO DATE SURVEY |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-10-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
sgraham |
Date |
2014-10-01 |
Time |
14:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
sgraham |
Date |
2014-10-01 |
Time |
14:56 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2014-10-01 14:57:54 | 10/1/14 ZONING FAILED 2ND CHECKLIST | | | | 1. PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF AN UP TO DATE SURVEY | | HIGHLIGTING THE NEW WORK. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2014-07-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
sgraham |
Date |
2014-07-08 |
Time |
14:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
sgraham |
Date |
2014-07-08 |
Time |
14:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2014-07-08 14:54:02 | 7/8/14 ZONING FAILED | | | | 1. PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF AN UP TO DATE SURVEY | 2014-06-25 11:52:56 | 6/25/14 |
|
|