2014-06-07 08:15:09 | 2010 FBC |
| |
| DENIED BY BUILDING |
| |
| 1) THE PROPOSED WORK IS TO ENCLOSE THE COURTYARD AREA |
| ON THE ZERO LOT LINE SIDE OF THE DWELLING. THE COURT |
| YARD FOR THIS MODEL SERVES AS PART OF THE REQUIRED |
| EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND RESCUE OPENING FOR A SLEEPING |
| ROOM. THE BUILDING CODE DOES NOT ALLOW OPENINGS ON THE |
| ZERO LOT LINE. HAVING THE COURTYARD PROVIDED A WALL |
| THAT WAS NOT ON THE ZERO LOT LINE AND ALLOWED THE |
| REQUIRED EGRESS OPENING FOR THE SLEEPING ROOMS. THE |
| HATCH OPENING IN THE COURTYARD WALL PROVIDES AN ESCAPE |
| ROUTE FROM THE SLEEPING ROOM AND ACCESS TO THE SLEEPING |
| ROOM FOR RESCUE PERSONNEL. THERE IS ALSO AN EMERGENCY |
| EGRESS EASEMENT ACROSS THE ADJACENT PROPERTY IN THE |
| SUBDIVISION COVENANTS. |
| THE BUILDING OFFICIAL WILL DETERMINE IF THE PROPOSED |
| WORK CAN BE ALLOWED. PLEASE SUBMIT TWO SETS OF FLOOR |
| PLANS FOR THE ENTIRE DWELLING WITH ALL OF THE EXISTING |
| ROOMS LABELED. SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF THE CLOSETS, DOORS |
| AND WINDOWS. FBC R310 |
| |
| 2) SUBMIT TWO SETS OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS FOR THE |
| ADDITION. FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION 401.2 |
| |
| 3) THE CONSTRUCTION TYPE IS INCORRECTLY SPECIFIED AS |
| III-B ON SHEET CVR. THE CONSTRUCTION TYPE FOR THIS |
| STRUCTURE IS V-B. FBC 602 |
| |
| 4) THE OCCUPANCY TYPE IS INCORRECTLY SPECIFIED AS R1A |
| ON SHEET CVR. THE OCCUPANCY TYPE FOR THIS SINGLE FAMILY |
| DWELLING IS R-3 . |
| |
| 5) THE PROPOSED PLAN SPECIFIES A 3' X 3' CASEMENT |
| WINDOW ON THE ZERO LOT LINE. NO OPENINGS ARE ALLOWED ON |
| A ZERO LOT LINE. ONE HOUR FIRE RATED GLASS BLOCK IS |
| ALLOWED. FBCR 302.1 |
| |
| 6) THE EXISTING FOOTING WAS DESIGNED TO SUPPORT A CBS |
| WALL, IF YOU INTEND TO USE IT TO SUPPORT AN EXTERIOR |
| BEARING WALL, THE FOOTER AND EXISTING WALL WILL NEED TO |
| BE EVALUATED FOR ALL OF THE REQUIRED LOADS OR A COPY OF |
| THE ORIGINAL PLANS FOR THE WALL WILL NEED TO BE |
| SUBMITTED. FBC R401.2 THE DEMO PLAN ON SHEET D-1 AND |
| WALL SECTION 7 ON A-1 SHOW THAT THE EXISTING FOOTER, |
| WALL AND SLAB ARE TO BE USED. |
| |
| 7) SHEET S-1 APPEARS TO SHOW THAT A NEW FOOTING, WALL |
| AND SLAB WILL BE CONSTRUCTED. PLEASE CLARIFY. CITY |
| AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 |
| |
| 8) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC R318 FOR TERMITE |
| PROTECTION, IF THE EXISTING SLAB IS USED. |
| |
| 9) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC R506.2.3 FOR THE REQUIRED |
| UNDER SLAB VAPOR RETARDER, IF THE EXISTING SLAB IS |
| USED. |
| |
| 10) SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC R404.1.6 FOR THE REQUIRED |
| HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE, IF THE EXISTING SLAB IS USED. |
| |
| 11) THE ROOF SHEATHING FASTENING IS INCONSISTENT. 10D |
| NAILS ARE SPECIFIED IN DETAIL 3 ON S-2 AND 8D NAILS ARE |
| SPECIFIED ALSO. PLEASE CORRECT. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 |
| AND FBC R803.2.3.1 |
| |
| 12) THE SINGLE ASSEMBLE ROOF RAFTERS/JOISTS ARE |
| SPECIFIED AS 2 X 6 ON SECTION 7/A-1 AND 2 X 8 ON S-2. |
| PLEASE CORRECT. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 |
| |
| 13) ON SHEET S-2, HETA-16 EMBED TYPE TRUSS ANCHORS ARE |
| SPECIFIED AT THE EXISTING WALL FOR THE 2 X 8 ROOF |
| JOISTS. A DOUBLE 2 X 8 LEDGER IS ALSO SPECIFIED AT THIS |
| LOCATION. THIS DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE THE CORRECT ANCHOR |
| FOR THIS LOCATION. PLEASE CLARIFY. PROVIDE A STRUCTURAL |
| SECTION DETAIL OF THIS LOCATION. |
| |
| 14) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF THE EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE |
| SPRAY FOAM INSULATION. FBC R316.3 AND R316.4 |
| |
| 15) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE PRODUCTS REGULATED |
| BY DCA RULE 9N-3, SUCH AS, ROOF COVERING, TRUSS |
| ANCHORS, GLASS BLOCK. |
| |
| 16) THE VALUE OF $11,500.00 IS LOW FOR THIS SCOPE WORK. |
| FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES VALUATION SHALL BE TOTAL |
| REPLACEMENT VALUE TO INCLUDE STRUCTURAL, ELECTRIC, |
| PLUMBING MECHANICAL, INTERIOR FINISH, RELATIVE SITE |
| WORK, ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN FEES, OVERHEAD AND |
| PROFIT. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF THE SIGNED CONTRACT. |
| CITY AMENDMENTS 109.3 |
| |
| ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| (561)805-6714 |
| [email protected] |