| Plan Review Stops For Permit 13010418 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2013-02-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2013-02-07 |
Time |
08:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2013-02-07 |
Time |
08:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-01-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2013-01-31 |
Time |
08:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2013-01-31 |
Time |
08:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-01-31 08:25:15 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 RESIDENTIAL | | | | | | 1-4. OK | | | | | | 5. SEE FBC 2010 ENERGY CONSERVATION, TABLE 101.4.1. | | | COMPONENTS BEING CHANGED ARE TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF FBC 2010 ENERGY CONSERVATION CHAPTER 4 WHEN THE | | | ESTIMATED COST EXCEEDS 30 PERCENT OF THE ASSESSED VALUE | | | OF THE STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED. THIS IS PROVIDED FROM THE | | | MANUFACTURER. | | | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | HORIZONTAL ROLLER METHOD OF INSTALLATION PROPOSED | | | (-60PSF) DOES NOT COMPLY WITH DESIGN PRESSURES | | | SPECIFIED BY ENGINEER (-60.9). EITHER REVISE THE DESIGN | | | PRESSURES OR THE PRODUCT APPROVAL WILL BE REDLINED FOR | | | YOU TO INDICATE A METHOD OF INSTALLATION WHICH MEETS | | | -63PSF. | | | | | | PLEASE SEND PRIVATE PROVIDER'S RESUME TO KEN CONRAD AT | | | [email protected]. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-01-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2013-01-22 |
Time |
09:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2013-01-22 |
Time |
07:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-01-22 09:39:10 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 | | | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2010 RESIDENTIAL | | | | | | 1. REVISE FLOOR PLAN TO INCLUDE ROOM DESIGNATIONS. | | | THERE IS A NOTE ON SHEET A1 THAT EMERGENCY ESCAPE AND | | | RESCUE OPENINGS (FOR SLEEPING ROOMS) TO COMPLY WITH FBC | | | 1029 (SEE ALSO FBC R310). | | | | | | 2. REVISE FLOOR PLAN TO INCLUDE HORIZONTAL ROLLER | | | CONFIGURATIONS AND SINGLE HUNG CONFIGURATIONS OR REVISE | | | WINDOW SCHEDULE TO INCLUDE THIS INFORMATIN (**SLEEPING | | | ROOMS ONLY**). FOR INSTANCE, SEE OPENING O. THE WINDOW | | | WIDTH EXCEEDS MAX FOR AN XO WINDOW, SEE SHEET 4, BUT | | | NOT CLEAR WHETHER AN XOX (DETAIL B OR C) WILL MEET | | | MINIMUM EGRESS WIDTH. SEE ALSO SHEET 4 OF SINGLE HUNG | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 3. A2, WINDOW BUCK DETAIL, SPECIFICATION PROPOSES A 1X3 | | | BEVELED BUCK. THIS CONFLICTS WITH THE GRAPHIC AND FBC R | | | 612.10.2.1 WHICH REQUIRES FULL SUPPORT OF THE WINDOW | | | UNLESS OTHERWISE TESTED. | | | | | | 4. DELEGATED ENGINEERING TO BE REVIEWED BY ENGINEER OF | | | RECORD, FS471, FAC61G15 (WINDOW DESIGN PRESSURE | | | ENGINEERING AND FLOOR PLAN). | | | | | | 5. SEE FBC 2010 ENERGY CONSERVATION, TABLE 101.4.1. | | | COMPONENTS BEING CHANGED ARE TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF FBC 2010 ENERGY CONSERVATION CHAPTER 4 WHEN THE | | | ESTIMATED COST EXCEEDS 30 PERCENT OF THE ASSESSED VALUE | | | OF THE STRUCTURE. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2013-01-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rlecky |
Date |
2013-01-30 |
Time |
13:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rlecky |
Date |
2013-01-30 |
Time |
12:54 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2013-01-30 13:04:19 | THE FOLLOWING CODE REQUIREMENTS WERE NOTED ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | PROVISO: | | | | | | REMODELING OF AN EXISTING STRUCTURE IS REQUIRED TO | | | INCLUDE INTERCONNECTED SMOKE ALARMS BOTH WITHIN AND | | | OUTSIDE EACH SLEEPING AREA. IF THE RESIDENCE HAS GAS | | | APPLIANCES, AN ATTACHED GARAGE OR A FIRE PLACE A CARBON | | | MONOXIDE DETECTOR IS REQUIRED WITHIN TEN FEET OF EACH | | | ROOM USED FOR SLEEPING. 2010 FBC R314, 315 | | | | | | NEW RECEPTACLES MUST BE TAMPER RESISTANT. NEC 406.11 | | | | | | ARC FAULT CIRCUIT PROTECTION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL NEW | | | GENERAL PURPOSE OUTLETS INCLUDING LIGHTING. NEC 210.12 | | | | | | THE NEW BATHROOM REQUIRES A DEDICATED 20 AMP BRANCH | | | CIRCUIT. NEC 210.11 (C) (3) | | | | | | ROBERT LECKY | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6718 | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-01-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rlecky |
Date |
2013-01-24 |
Time |
12:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rlecky |
Date |
2013-01-24 |
Time |
12:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-01-24 12:19:21 | 13010418 | | | 227 ELWA PLACE | | | SF REMODEL | | | | | | PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING | | | ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | | | | REMODELING OF AN EXISTING STRUCTURE IS REQUIRED TO | | | INCLUDE INTERCONNECTED SMOKE ALARMS BOTH WITHIN AND | | | OUTSIDE EACH SLEEPING AREA. IF THE RESIDENCE HAS GAS | | | APPLIANCES, AN ATTACHED GARAGE OR A FIRE PLACE A CARBON | | | MONOXIDE DETECTOR IS REQUIRED WITHIN TEN FEET OF EACH | | | ROOM USED FOR SLEEPING. 2010 FBC R314, 315 | | | | | | NEW RECEPTACLES MUST BE TAMPER RESISTANT. NEC 406.11 | | | | | | ARC FAULT CIRCUIT PROTECTION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL NEW | | | GENERAL PURPOSE OUTLETS INCLUDING LIGHTING. NEC 210.12 | | | | | | THE NEW BATHROOM REQUIRES A DEDICATED 20 AMP BRANCH | | | CIRCUIT. NEC 210.11 (C) (3) | | | | | | ROBERT LECKY | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6718 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2013-02-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mdekle |
Date |
2013-02-04 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mdekle |
Date |
2013-02-01 |
Time |
11:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-02-01 11:58:15 | SENT TO MURRIAH. DID NOT ADDRESS BUILDING ISSUES. PLANS | | | STILL IN LARGE DENIED BIN UNDER 'T'. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2013-01-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2013-01-31 |
Time |
08:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2013-01-29 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2013-01-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-01-29 |
Time |
15:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-01-16 |
Time |
16:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-01-16 16:43:29 | EXPEDITED | | | R--12 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2013-01-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-01-29 |
Time |
15:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2013-01-29 |
Time |
15:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2013-02-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mdekle |
Date |
2013-02-07 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mdekle |
Date |
2013-02-07 |
Time |
13:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-02-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mdekle |
Date |
2013-02-04 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mdekle |
Date |
2013-02-04 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-02-04 15:36:03 | REVIEW STATUS: FAILED | | | | | | THE RESUBMITTAL DID NOT HAVE ANY DETAILS ATTACHED. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE FURTHER ELABORATION REGARDING THE | | | SUBMITTAL WHICH ONLY INCLUDED TWO SURVEYS WITH HAND | | | DRAWN CIRCLES?? | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT ME AND/OR | | | CONSULT THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS ONLINE @WWW.MUNICODE.COM. | | | | | | MURRIAH DEKLE, MPA, PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | TEL: (561) 822-1442 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | ZONING PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2013-01-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mdekle |
Date |
2013-01-24 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mdekle |
Date |
2013-01-24 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-01-24 13:40:07 | PLANNING: **** PASSED W/PROVISO **** | | | | | | 1.PRIOR TO THE FIRST INSPECTION, THE APPLICANT MUST | | | SUBMIT TWO (2) COPIES OF A LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING | | | COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-442 AND 94-445 OF THE ZLDR. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT ME AND/OR | | | CONSULT THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS ONLINE @WWW.MUNICODE.COM. | | | | | | MURRIAH DEKLE, MPA, PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | TEL: (561) 822-1442 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2013-01-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mdekle |
Date |
2013-01-18 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
mdekle |
Date |
2013-01-18 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-01-18 10:35:41 | PLANNING: **** FAILED **** | | | | | | RESPOND TO COMMENTS IN WRITING. | | | | | | 1. PLEASE SUBMIT TWO (2) COPIES OF A LANDSCAPE PLAN | | | SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SECTIONS 94-442 AND 94-445 OF | | | THE ZLDR. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-441(C)(2) OF THE | | | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR): AS THE | | | VALUE OF THE PROPOSED WORK ($76,000.00) EXCEEDS 50% OF | | | THE STRUCTURE'S VALUE ($123,336.00) (LISTED AS | | | "IMPROVEMENT VALUE" WITH THE P.B.C. PROPERTY | | | APPRAISER'S OFFICE), LANDSCAPING SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE | | | WITH ALL APPLICABLE REGULATIONS FOUND IN ARTICLE XIV OF | | | THE ZLDR. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT ME AND/OR | | | CONSULT THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS ONLINE @WWW.MUNICODE.COM. | | | | | | MURRIAH DEKLE, MPA, PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | TEL: (561) 822-1442 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | 2013-01-17 10:51:01 | 1/17/13 |
|
|
