2013-01-17 10:35:34 | 2010 FBC |
| |
| DENIED BY BUILDING |
| |
| 1) THE APPRAISAL FOR THE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SUBJECT |
| PROPERTY INDICATES THAT THE HOME IS VALUED AT |
| $200,000.00. THE 2010 FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION SECTION |
| 101.4.3, REQUIRES THE PORTIONS OF EXISTING BUILDINGS |
| BEING RENOVATED TO COMPLY WITH TABLE 101.4.1 AS IT |
| RELATES TO NEW CONSTRUCTION IF THE ESTIMATED COSTS |
| EXCEEDS 30 PERCENT OF THE ASSESSED VALUE OF THE |
| STRUCTURE. BECAUSE THE VALUE OF THE PROPOSED WORK ($ |
| 65,000.00) EXCEEDS 30 PERCENT OF $200,000.00 ($ |
| 60,000.00), THE WINDOWS, DOORS AND EXTERIOR INSULATION |
| ( COMPONENTS BEING CHANGED) ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH |
| SECTION 402.1 AND THE VALUES LISTED IN TABLE 402.1.1 OR |
| COMPLY WITH PERFORMANCE-BASE METHOD FOR THE WHOLE HOUSE |
| IN SECTION 405. SHOW COMPLIANCE. |
| |
| 2) THE ENGINEER THAT SIGNED AND SEALED THE DESIGN |
| PRESSURES FOR THE WINDOW AND DOOR OPENINGS FOR ROYAL |
| PALM ALUMINUM IS DIFFERENT THAN THE DESIGNER OF RECORD |
| FOR THE PROJECT. THEIR MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES ARE |
| ALSO HIGHER THAN THOSE SPECIFIED ON THE PLAN BY THE |
| DESIGNER OF RECORD. THE ENGINEER IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE |
| IS REQUIRED TO REVIEW THE SPECIALTY ENGINEER'S WORK AND |
| APPROVE IT WITH HIS SHOP DRAWING STAMP. FS 471 |
| |
| 3) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9N-3 |
| SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| DESIGNER OF RECORD PER CITY AMENDMENTS 107.3.4.1 |
| |
| ROBERT MCDOUGAL |
| BLDG. PLAN REVIEW |
| (561)805-6714 |
| [email protected] |