Plan Review Stops For Permit 12070739 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-10-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-10-16 |
Time |
12:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-10-16 |
Time |
12:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2012-10-16 12:12:15 | AN LETTER FROM THE DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR ALL OF THE | | PRODUCT APPROVALS IS REQUIRED TO BE PROVIDED TO THE | | FIELD INSPECTOR. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-08-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-08-21 |
Time |
16:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-08-21 |
Time |
13:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2012-08-21 16:08:48 | 2010 FBC | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | 1) SUBMIT ENERGY CALCULATION FORMS FOR THE ENCLOSED | | ENTRY TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION | | CHAPTER 4. | | | | 2) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED | | AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD FOR | | THE PROJECT PER CITY AMENDMENTS 107.3.4.1. | | | | 3) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE | | 1/2 ROUND FIXED GLASS WINDOWS AND THE STRUCTURAL WINDOW | | MULLIONS AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9N-3. | | | | 4) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE | | SIMPSON STRAPS AND CONNECTORS AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE | | 9N-3. | | | | 5) SPECIFY WHICH ONE OF THE FASTENING METHODS LISTED IN | | THE ROOF TILE PRODUCT APPROVAL WILL BE USED. FBC | | R905.3.7 IF AN ADHESIVE WILL BE USED, SUBMIT TWO COPIES | | OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR IT AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE | | 9N-3. | | | | 6) THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR THE SINGLE OUT-SWING DOOR | | IN THE PRODUCT APPROVAL ARE LOWER THAN THE REQUIRED | | OPENING PRESSURES SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS FOR THE DOOR. | | SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF DOOR PRODUCT APPROVALS WITH DESIGN | | PRESSURES HIGHER THAN THE ONES LISTED ON THE PLANS. FBC | | R301.2.1 | | | | 7) THE PLANS ARE REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED BY PALM BEACH | | COUNTY TO DETERMINE IF ANY IMPACT FEES WILL BE DUE. THE | | PLANS WITH THE IMPACT REVIEW STAMP AND A COPY OF THE | | PAID RECEIPT WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE THE PERMIT IS | | ISSUED. | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | (561)805-6714 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-07-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rlecky |
Date |
2012-07-31 |
Time |
13:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rlecky |
Date |
2012-07-31 |
Time |
13:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2012-10-19 |
Time |
17:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2012-10-22 17:26:44 | GAVE TO MCDOUGAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2012-10-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-10-16 |
Time |
12:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-09-24 |
Time |
16:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2012-09-25 16:01:29 | SENT TO MCDOUGAL'S DESK FOR REVIEW. JG. |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2012-08-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-08-21 |
Time |
16:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-07-20 |
Time |
17:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-10-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-10-30 |
Time |
16:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-10-30 |
Time |
16:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-08-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-08-21 |
Time |
13:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-08-21 |
Time |
13:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2012-08-21 13:47:02 | AN IMPACT FEE REVIEW BY PALM BEACH COUNTY IS REQUIRED. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-08-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mdekle |
Date |
2012-08-10 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mdekle |
Date |
2012-08-10 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2012-08-10 10:47:08 | IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 94-305 (B) - THE PROPOSED | | AWNING MAY PROJECT INTO THE BUILDING SETBACK. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-07-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mdekle |
Date |
2012-07-30 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.50 |
Received By |
mdekle |
Date |
2012-07-30 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2012-07-30 12:12:11 | PLANNING: **** FAILED **** | | PLEASE RESPOND TO COMMENTS IN WRITING. | | | | 1. PURSUANT TO SECTION SEC. 94-75 OF THE ZONING AND | | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ("ZLDR"), THE MINIMUM | | SETBACKS FOR PRINCIPAL BUILDING IN A MULTIFAMILY LOW | | DENSITY ("MF14") RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT IS AS FOLLOWS: | | A. FRONT: 25 FEET; | | B. CORNER: 12.5 FEET; | | C. REAR: 15 FEET OR TEN PERCENT OF LOT DEPTH, WHICHEVER | | IS LESS; | | D. SIDE: FIVE FEET MINIMUM, 15 FEET TOTAL | | THE PROPOSED FRONT SETBACK DEPICTED ON THE SITE PLAN OF | | 20.35 FEET DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM STANDARDS. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT ME. | | | | MURRIAH DEKLE, MPA | | PLANNER | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | TEL: (561) 822-1442 | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | |
|
|