| Plan Review Stops For Permit 12060388 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-09-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-09-06 |
Time |
16:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-09-06 |
Time |
11:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-09-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-09-04 |
Time |
15:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-09-04 |
Time |
11:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-09-04 15:36:26 | 2010 FBC | | | | | | 1) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED DO NOT MATCH THE | | | PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBERS LISTED IN THE WINDOW AND DOOR | | | SCHEDULES FOR THE FIXED WINDOWS, HORIZONTAL SLIDING | | | WINDOWS OR THE ENTRY DOOR. PLEASE CORRECT. DCA RULE | | | 9N-3 | | | | | | 2) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE LINTELS AND TRUSS | | | ANCHORS HAVE NOT BEEN UPLOADED. DCA RULE 9N-3 | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-07-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-07-25 |
Time |
14:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-07-25 |
Time |
14:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-07-25 13:29:18 | 2010 FBC | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | | | 1) CORRECTED. | | | | | | 2) CORRECTED. | | | | | | 3) CORRECTED. HOWEVER, THE DOOR SCHEDULE LISTS TWO | | | STATE PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBERS FOR THE AMARR GARAGE | | | DOOR. THE PRODUCT APPROVAL PRESSURES (-52.1, +45.9 PSF) | | | LISTED IN THE SCHEDULE ARE FOR FL #7170-R3. ACCORDING | | | TO THE PRODUCT EVALUATION, FL #6243 HAS PRESSURES OF | | | (-41.0, +37.0 PSF) WHICH ARE LESS THAN THE REQUIRED | | | OPENING PRESSURES SPECIFIED IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE. | | | PLEASE CORRECT. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 AND R301.2.1 | | | | | | 4) CORRECTED. | | | | | | 5) CORRECTED. | | | | | | 6) CORRECTED. | | | | | | 7) CORRECTED. | | | | | | 8) SUBMIT CURRENT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE EXTERIOR | | | DOORS, WINDOWS, ROOFING MATERIAL, LINTELS AND OTHER | | | COMPONENTS AND CLADDING REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9N-3. | | | PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE ROOFING MATERIAL, LINTELS AND | | | TRUSS ANCHORS HAVE NOT BEEN SUBMITTED. ALSO, PLEASE | | | SUBMIT THE FL COVERSHEET AND EVALUATION REPORT FOR THE | | | FIBERGLASS ENTRY DOOR. | | | | | | 9) SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR | | | EVALUATIONS FOR THE SPRAY FOAM INSULATION, FIRE | | | RETARDANT COATING AND HUBER ROOF SHEATHING. | | | | | | 10) CORRECTED. | | | | | | 11) THE WINDLOADS SPECIFIED IN THE TABLE ON SHEET S-3 | | | NEEDS TO MATCH THE OPENING PRESSURES SPECIFIED IN THE | | | WINDOW AND DOOR SCHEDULES ON THE ARCHITECTURAL | | | DRAWINGS. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 AND FBC R301.2.1 THE | | | SLIDING GLASS DOOR AND OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR PRESSURES | | | DO NOT MATCH. ALSO, IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE THE POSITIVE | | | PRESSURE IS MORE THAN THE NEGATIVE PRESSURE FOR THE | | | SLIDING GLASS DOOR. THE NEGATIVE PRESSURE IS ALWAYS | | | HIGHER. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | 12) THE FLOOR PLAN, ROOF PLAN AND ELEVATIONS THAT WERE | | | SUBMITTED ARE ALL FOR A 6 UNIT BUILDING. IF YOU WISH TO | | | USE THIS MASTER FOR BUILDINGS WITH OTHER THAN SIX UNITS | | | YOU WILL NEED TO SUBMIT FLOOR PLANS, ROOF PLANS AND | | | ELEVATIONS FOR EACH OF THE DIFFERENT CONFIGURATIONS. | | | CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 | | | | | | 13) NEW COMMENT. ON SHEET S-3 THE INTERIOR AND CORNER | | | ZONE PRESSURES FOR THE ENTRY DOOR ARE THE SAME. THE | | | CORNER ZONE PRESSURES SHOULD BE HIGHER. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | FBC R301.2.1 | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-06-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-06-29 |
Time |
13:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-07-25 |
Time |
11:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-06-29 12:29:46 | 2010 FBC | | | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | | | 1) ON PLAN SHEET T-1, THE STRUCTURAL NOTES SPECIFY ASCE | | | 7-05 AND A WINDSPEED OF 175 MPH. THE 2010 FBC | | | REFERENCES ASCE 7-10 AND THE WINDSPEED FOR RISK | | | CATEGORY II IS 170 MPH. FBC CHAPTER 43 AND FBC | | | R301.2.1.1 | | | | | | 2) PLEASE UPDATE THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS SPECIFIED ON | | | T-1 TO THE 2008 EDITIONS. ACI 318, ACI 530, ASCE 5, AND | | | TMS 402. FBCR CHAPTER 43 | | | | | | 3) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL INFORMATION IN THE DOOR AND | | | WINDOW SCHEDULE NEED TO BE BROUGHT CURRENT. ALL OF THEM | | | HAVE EXPIRED, BEEN SUPERSEDED OR BEEN REVISED. DCA RULE | | | 9N-3 | | | | | | 4) THE REQUIRED OPENING PRESSURES LISTED IN THE | | | SCHEDULE FOR DOOR NUMBER 2 ARE HIGHER THAN THE ONES | | | INDICATED FROM THE PRODUCT APPROVAL. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | FBC R301.2.1 | | | | | | 5) PLEASE REVIEW ALL NEW PRODUCT APPROVAL DESIGN | | | PRESSURES AGAINST THE REQUIRED OPENING PRESSURES TO | | | VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH FBC R301.2.1 | | | | | | 6) IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE ON SHEET TU-1.0 THE REMARKS FOR | | | DOOR 2 HAVE BEEN PRINTED OVER AND ARE NOT LEGIBLE. | | | PLEASE CORRECT. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 | | | | | | 7) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED | | | AND APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. CITY AMENDMENTS | | | 107.3.4.1 | | | | | | 8) SUBMIT CURRENT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE EXTERIOR | | | DOORS, WINDOWS, ROOFING MATERIAL, LINTELS AND OTHER | | | COMPONENTS AND CLADDING REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9N-3. | | | | | | 9) SUBMIT MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR | | | EVALUATIONS FOR THE SPRAY FOAM INSULATION, FIRE | | | RETARDANT COATING AND HUBER ROOF SHEATHING. | | | | | | 10) ON SHEET S-1 IN THE DESIGN PARAMETERS AND | | | ASSUMPTION TABLE UNDER BUILDING HEIGHT ASCE 7-05 IS | | | SPECIFIED. PLEASE UPDATE TO ASCE 7-10. FBCR CHAPTER 43 | | | | | | 11) THE WINDLOADS SPECIFIED IN THE TABLE ON SHEET S-3 | | | NEEDS TO MATCH THE OPENING PRESSURES SPECIFIED IN THE | | | WINDOW AND DOOR SCHEDULES ON THE ARCHITECTURAL | | | DRAWINGS. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 AND FBC R301.2.1 | | | | | | 12) THE FLOOR PLAN, ROOF PLAN AND ELEVATIONS THAT WERE | | | SUBMITTED ARE ALL FOR A 6 UNIT BUILDING. IF YOU WISH TO | | | USE THIS MASTER FOR BUILDINGS WITH OTHER THAN SIX UNITS | | | YOU WILL NEED TO SUBMIT FLOOR PLANS, ROOF PLANS AND | | | ELEVATIONS FOR EACH OF THE DIFFERENT CONFIGURATIONS. | | | CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-09-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-09-06 |
Time |
16:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-09-06 |
Time |
16:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-09-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-09-04 |
Time |
11:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-09-04 |
Time |
11:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-09-04 11:33:46 | COMMENTS FROM FIRST AND SECOND REVIEWS HAVE NOT BEEN | | | ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 2010 FBC & 2008 NEC | | | | | | DENIED BY ELECTRIC | | | | | | 1) ON SHEET E-1 0 THROUGH E-1 3 NOTE 1 UNDER ELECTRICAL | | | SPECIFICATIONS REFERENCES THE 2007 FBC W/2009 | | | REVISIONS. PLEASE UPDATE TO THE 2010 FBC. CITY | | | AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 | | | | | | 2) THE NOTE BELOW THE LOAD CALCULATIONS ON THE | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN SHEETS SPECIFIES THE 2005 NEC. PLEASE | | | UPDATE TO THE 2008 NEC. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 | | | | | | 3) THE RECEPTACLE ON THE CEILING FOR THE OVERHEAD | | | GARAGE DOOR OPENER IS REQUIRED TO BE GFCI PROTECTED PER | | | 2008 NEC ART.210.8 (A). | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-07-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-07-25 |
Time |
11:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-07-25 |
Time |
11:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-07-25 11:22:35 | COMMENTS FROM FIRST REVIEW HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | 2010 FBC & 2008 NEC | | | | | | DENIED BY ELECTRIC | | | | | | 1) ON SHEET E-1 0 THROUGH E-1 3 NOTE 1 UNDER ELECTRICAL | | | SPECIFICATIONS REFERENCES THE 2007 FBC W/2009 | | | REVISIONS. PLEASE UPDATE TO THE 2010 FBC. CITY | | | AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 | | | | | | 2) THE NOTE BELOW THE LOAD CALCULATIONS ON THE | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN SHEETS SPECIFIES THE 2005 NEC. PLEASE | | | UPDATE TO THE 2008 NEC. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 | | | | | | 3) THE RECEPTACLE ON THE CEILING FOR THE OVERHEAD | | | GARAGE DOOR OPENER IS REQUIRED TO BE GFCI PROTECTED PER | | | 2008 NEC ART.210.8 (A). | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-06-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-06-29 |
Time |
09:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-06-29 |
Time |
08:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-06-29 09:08:20 | 2010 FBC & 2008 NEC | | | | | | DENIED BY ELECTRIC | | | | | | 1) ON SHEET E-1 0 THROUGH E-1 3 NOTE 1 UNDER ELECTRICAL | | | SPECIFICATIONS REFERENCES THE 2007 FBC W/2009 | | | REVISIONS. PLEASE UPDATE TO THE 2010 FBC. CITY | | | AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 | | | | | | 2) THE NOTE BELOW THE LOAD CALCULATIONS ON THE | | | ELECTRICAL PLAN SHEETS SPECIFIES THE 2005 NEC. PLEASE | | | UPDATE TO THE 2008 NEC. CITY AMENDMENTS 107.2.1 | | | | | | 3) THE RECEPTACLE ON THE CEILING FOR THE OVERHEAD | | | GARAGE DOOR OPENER IS REQUIRED TO BE GFCI PROTECTED PER | | | 2008 NEC ART.210.8 (A). | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2012-07-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
wjolin |
Date |
2012-07-19 |
Time |
08:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
wjolin |
Date |
2012-07-19 |
Time |
08:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-07-19 08:45:34 | THE FLORIDA FIRE CODE INTERPRETATIONS COMMITTEE (FCIC) | | | HAS RULED THAT FEE SIMPLE TOWNHOMES WITH A TWO-HOUR | | | FIRE BARRIER BETWEEN UNITS ARE CONSIDERED TO BE A ONE | | | OR TWO FAMILY DWELLING; THEREFORE, NO FIRE SPRINKLERS, | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW OR FIRE INSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-06-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
wjolin |
Date |
2012-06-23 |
Time |
17:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
wjolin |
Date |
2012-06-23 |
Time |
17:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-06-23 17:15:36 | 8321 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD | | | PERMIT #12060388 | | | REVIEW COMMENTS - FIRE DEPARTMENT | | | | | | DESIGN SHALL CONFORM TO THE 2010 EDITION OF THE FLORIDA | | | FIRE PREVENTION CODE WHICH CONTAINS THE 2009 EDITION OF | | | BOTH NFPA 1 AND NFPA 101 WITH FLORIDA AMENDMENTS. | | | | | | ALL NEW APARTMENTS AND TOWNHOUSES SHALL BE PROTECTED | | | THROUGHOUT BY AN APPROVED, SUPERVISED AUTOMATIC | | | SPRINKLER SYSTEM PER SECTION 30.3.5.1 (NFPA 101 - | | | FLORIDA EDITION 2009). | | | | | | FOR ISSUANCE OF A GENERAL BUILDING PERMIT, SECTION | | | 105.3.1.2(2) OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE REQUIRES | | | SEALED (BY DESIGN PROFESSIONAL) FIRE PROTECTION | | | CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR THE DESIGN OF 50 OR MORE | | | AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS. | | | | | | FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE MONITORED BY AN APPROVED | | | SUPERVISING STATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 72. | | | | | | PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004, | | | FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE | | | POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF | | | APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT, | | | CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR | | | AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER | | | SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA) | | | AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS | | | PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS. | | | | | | WESLEY JOLIN | | | OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2012-06-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-06-29 |
Time |
13:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-06-25 |
Time |
11:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-06-14 10:33:03 | MASTER PERMIT APPLICATION SENT TO RON FOR ELECTRONIC | | | PLANS PROCESSING. JG. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-07-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-07-25 |
Time |
11:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-07-25 |
Time |
11:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-06-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-06-28 |
Time |
10:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-06-28 |
Time |
10:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-06-28 11:00:24 | 2010 FBC | | | | | | MECHANICAL DENIED | | | | | | 1) THIS SUBMITTAL IS FOR A MASTER PLAN. THE ENERGY | | | CALCULATIONS THAT WERE SUBMITTED UNDER ENERGY BUILDING | | | 7 RHEEM ARE WORSE CASE CALCULATIONS FOR SPECIFIC UNITS | | | WITH ADDRESS AND LOT NUMBER. ONLY ONE ENERGY | | | CALCULATION IS REQUIRED FOR EACH OF THE DIFFERENT TYPES | | | OF UNITS THAT WILL BE IN THE DIFFERENT BUILDINGS. FOR | | | EXAMPLE: INTERIOR WITH GARAGE LEFT AND GARAGE RIGHT AND | | | END UNITS WITH GARAGE LEFT AND GARAGE RIGHT. 2010 FBC | | | ENERGY CONSERVATION SECTION 405 | | | | | | 2) THE ENERGY CALCS UNDER END UNIT 2 AND END UNIT 1 ARE | | | FOR INTERIOR UNITS. PLEASE CORRECT. 2010 FBC ENERGY | | | CONSERVATION SECTION 405 | | | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | | (561)805-6714 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-06-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-06-28 |
Time |
09:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2012-06-28 |
Time |
09:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2013-01-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2012-09-07 |
Time |
15:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2012-09-07 |
Time |
15:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-09-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2012-09-07 |
Time |
12:56 |
Rev Time |
3.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2012-09-07 |
Time |
12:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-09-07 13:08:32 | PASSED W/PROVISOS | | | | | | 1) THE SCREEN ENCLOSURES REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMITS AND | | | ARE NOT APPROVED AS PART OF THE MASTER. | | | | | | 2) THE INCLUSION OF THE PRIVACY WALL AS A DESIGN OPTION | | | REQUIRES THE APPROVAL OF A MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT | | | AMENDMENT PRIOR TO IT BEING INCLUDED ON ANY BUILDING | | | PERMITS. THE PRIVACY WALL IN NOT PART OF THIS APPROVAL. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-06-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2012-06-26 |
Time |
11:40 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2012-06-26 |
Time |
11:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-06-26 11:42:39 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) THE EXTENDED PATIO PLANS WERE NOT PROVIDED WITH THE | | | BUILDING MASTER. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. |
|
|
