Plan Review Stops For Permit 12050314 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-06-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2012-06-21 |
Time |
13:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2012-06-21 |
Time |
13:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2012-06-21 13:42:25 | ADVISED CUSTOMER (CINDI) THAT DUE TO ZONING REDLINE OF | | 1' OFF PROPERTY LINE, SCREEN ENCLOSURE SIZE REDUCED BY | | 1'. IF THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE, EITHER RESUBMIT, OR HAVE | | PERMIT ISSUED AND SUBMIT A REVISION. | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-05-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2012-05-21 |
Time |
16:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2012-05-21 |
Time |
16:22 |
Sent To |
ENG |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-06-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2012-06-06 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2012-06-06 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2012-06-06 11:23:08 | NO OBJECTION |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2012-06-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2012-06-21 |
Time |
13:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2012-06-20 |
Time |
09:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2012-06-20 09:33:14 | 6/20 TO SH DESK | | (PLAN REDLINED BY ZONING, NEEDS TO BE REDLINED BY | | BUILDING) | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2012-06-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2012-06-06 |
Time |
14:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2012-05-10 |
Time |
17:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2012-06-04 16:40:26 | 6/4 SUBMITTAL ROUTED TO ENGINEERING BOX | | | 2012-05-21 16:33:40 | 5/21 ROUTED TO ENGINEERING | | (PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION IN A DRAINAGE EASEMENT) | | | 2012-05-10 17:26:02 | IN ZONING BOX |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2012-06-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2012-06-19 |
Time |
17:09 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2012-06-19 |
Time |
17:09 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2012-06-19 17:14:56 | PASSED W/PROVISO | | | | PER DEBBIE OF SCREEN BUILDERS, THE SCREEN WILL BE | | CONSTRUCTED ONE FOOT OFF THE COMMON PROPERTY LINE. PER | | SAMANTHA HILL WAS OK TO REDLINE ENGINEER PLANS WITH THE | | PROVISO. | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-06-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2012-06-18 |
Time |
10:05 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2012-06-18 |
Time |
10:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2012-06-18 10:07:08 | FAILED | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT - THE SCREEN ENCLOSURE PLANS SHOW THE | | ENCLOSURE AT 13 FEET WIDE AND INDICATE THAT THE SCREEN | | ENCLOSURE WILL BE BUILT ON THE PROPERTY LINE. THE | | MARKED UP SURVEY SHOWS THE SCREEN ENCLOSURE BUILT IN | | LINE WITH THE PATIO, APPROXIMATELY ONE (1) FOOT FROM | | THE WESTERN LOT LINE LINE. IN EITHER CASE, THE | | ADDITIONAL FOOT IN WIDTH WILL AFFECT THE APPROVED | | LANDSCAPE. IF IT IS TO BE ONLY THE LANDSCAPE ON THE | | EAST SIDE OF THE ENCLOSURE, THEN IT MAY BE FIELD | | ADJUSTED. IF IT IS TO BE ON THE WEST PROPERTY LINE, | | THEN THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL BE REVISED TO | | SHOW THE RELOCATION OF THE PODOCARPUS HEDGE WHICH IS | | CURRENTLY SHOWN BETWEEN LOTS 72 AND 73. BOTH THE SITE | | PLAN AND ENGINEERING PLAN SHALL SHOW THE SAME | | CONDITIONS. | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ 822-1446. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2012-05-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2012-05-16 |
Time |
09:30 |
Rev Time |
0.75 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2012-05-11 |
Time |
10:40 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2012-05-16 11:07:57 | FAILED | | | | 1) PLEASE PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE DRAINAGE | | EASEMENT RECORDED IN O.R.B 21881, PAGE 705, HAS BEEN | | RELEASED OR AMENDED TO NOT INCLUDE THE PROPOSED PATIO | | AREA. NOTE #5 ON THE SURVEY STATES THAT THE EASEMENT | | WILL BE RELEASED PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BRICK | | PAVER PATIO. IN THE ABSENCE OF THE EASEMENT RELEASE, NO | | STRUCTURE MAY BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE EASEMENT. | | | | 2) THE SCREEN ENCLOSURE PLANS SHOW THE ENCLOSURE AT 13 | | FEET WIDE AND INDICATE THAT THE SCREEN ENCLOSURE WILL | | BE BUILT ON THE PROPERTY LINE. THE MARKED UP SURVEY | | SHOWS THE SCREEN ENCLOSURE BUILT IN LINE WITH THE | | PATIO, APPROXIMATELY ONE (1) FOOT FROM THE WESTERN LOT | | LINE LINE. IN EITHER CASE, THE ADDITIONAL FOOT IN WIDTH | | WILL AFFECT THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE. IF IT IS TO BE ONLY | | THE LANDSCAPE ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE ENCLOSURE, THEN | | IT MAY BE FIELD ADJUSTED. IF IT IS TO BE ON THE WEST | | PROPERTY LINE, THEN THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL | | BE REVISED TO SHOW THE RELOCATION OF THE PODOCARPUS | | HEDGE WHICH IS CURRENTLY SHOWN BETWEEN LOTS 72 AND 73. | | BOTH THE SITE PLAN AND ENGINEERING PLAN SHALL SHOW THE | | SAME CONDITIONS. | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ 822-1446. | 2012-05-11 10:40:59 | GIVEN TO ES |
|
|