2011-10-13 17:47:41 | FAILED |
| |
| 1) PROVIDE A RECENT SURVEY, LESS THAN ONE YEAR OLD, |
| THAT IS LEGIBLE AND TO SCALE. |
| |
| 2) IT IS UNCLEAR WHAT IS BEING REQUESTED. THE PLANS |
| SHOW MARKING FOR THE WALKWAY AND DRIVEWAY APPROACH AND |
| THEN REVISED SYMBOLS. WHAT IS THE SCOPE OF WORK? IS IT |
| ON THE PROPERTY OR THE RIGHT-OF-WAY? |
| |
| 3) THE PERMIT IS FOR A FIVE (5) FOOT WIDE WALKWAY, YET |
| NO DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN ON THE PLAN. |
| |
| 4) THE ZONING DIVISION WILL NOT APPROVE A DRIVEWAY |
| APPROACH WITHOUT THE INSTALLATION OF A DRIVEWAY. NO |
| PERMIT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR A DRIVEWAY. PLEASE NOTE |
| THAT PARKING ON GRASS OR DRIVING ACROSS GRASS TO GET TO |
| PARKING IS NOT PERMITTED. |
| |
| 5) DRIVEWAYS ARE ONLY PERMITTED TO BE A MAXIMUM OF 20 |
| FEET IN WIDTH. NO DIMENSION IS GIVEN FOR THE APPROACH. |
| |
| 6) DRIVEWAYS ARE TO BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF THREE (3) |
| FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. NO DIMENSION IS GIVEN FOR |
| THE INSIDE EDGE OF THE APPROACH. |
| |
| 7) THE CITY REQUIRES THAT 75% OF THE FRONT YARD BE |
| LANDSCAPED. THE ZONING DIVISION WILL NOT APPROVE AN |
| APPROACH THAT WOULD ALLOW A DRIVEWAY WHICH WOULD |
| VIOLATE THIS REQUIREMENT. IT APPEARS FROM THE DRAWING |
| THAT THIS MAY BE THE CASE WITH AN APPROACH HALF AS WIDE |
| AS THE LOT. |
| |
| 8) IT APPEARS THAT THERE IS SHRUB AND SOME TREES ALONG |
| THE PROPERTY LINE. NO VEGETATION MAY BE REMOVED AS PART |
| OF THIS PERMIT UNLESS IT IS REPLACED ELSEWHERE ON SITE. |
| |
| CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. |
2011-10-04 16:33:21 | GIVEN TO ES |