|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 10090558
Plan Review Stops For Permit 10090558 |
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2010-09-22 |
Time |
12:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-09-22 12:08:35 | IN ZONING BOX |
|
|
Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-11-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2010-11-23 |
Time |
16:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2010-11-23 |
Time |
16:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-11-23 16:59:24 | PLANS INCLUDED WITH REVISION PERMIT NO. 10110228. |
|
|
Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-09-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2010-09-30 |
Time |
16:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2010-09-30 |
Time |
16:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-09-30 16:41:25 | FAILED | | | | SEE ZONING REVIEW NOTES. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-11-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2010-11-23 |
Time |
16:58 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2010-11-23 |
Time |
16:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-09-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2010-09-30 |
Time |
16:38 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2010-09-24 |
Time |
14:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-09-30 16:39:32 | FAILED | | | | 1) PLANS COVER WORK UNDER BOTH PERMIT NUMBERS 10030228 | | (8100 OKEECHOBEE) AND 10060217 (8120 OKEECHOBEE). | | | | 2) THE PLANS ARE INCONSISTENT WITH THE PLANS SUBMITTED | | FOR THE BALANCE OF TRACT A WORK (#10090709). | | | | 3) THE PLANS WERE SUPPOSED TO BE "AS-BUILT", YET THE | | PLANS DO NOT REFLECT WHAT THE INSPECTOR OBSERVED IN THE | | FIELD. THE LANDSCAPE STRIP BETWEEN THE PARKING STALLS | | SHOWS 10 FEET. THE FIELD MEASUREMENT WAS LESS THAN 9 | | FEET. IN ADDITION, THERE IS A PAVED AREA WITH A DRAIN | | RUNNING THROUGH THE LANDSCAPE STRIP THAT IS NOT | | REFLECTED ON THIS PLAN. | | | | 4) THE PROPOSED HEDGE AROUND THE TRANSFORMER BLOCKS THE | | DOORS INTO THE UNIT (SOUTH SIDE). | | | | 5) THERE IS A SINGLE GREEN BUTTONWOOD TREE ALONG THE | | EAST PERIMETER OF THE SITE THAT SHALL BE RELOCATED | | ELSEWHERE AND REPLACED WITH A MAHOGANY TREE TO BE | | CONSISTENT WITH THE BALANCE OF THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER. | | | | 6) AN ADDITIONAL MAHOGANY TREE IS NEEDED ALONG THE | | NORTH PERIMETER BUFFER TOWARD THE WEST END (NORTHWEST | | OF DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE). | | | | 7) APPROVAL OF A MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT IS | | REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A REVISION TO THE | | ORIGINALLY APPROVED PERMIT PLANS. | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. | | | | |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
 |