| Plan Review Stops For Permit 10080608 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2011-04-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2011-04-29 |
Time |
16:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2011-04-29 |
Time |
16:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2011-04-29 16:07:00 | ***PROVISO*** | | | | | | PER CONTRACTOR - PARKING STRIPING AREA DOES NOT SERVE | | | AS PARKING, "SHOWROOM" (DISPLAY) CAR STORAGE ONLY | | | | | | ANY CHANGE IN USE (PARKING FOR EMPLOYEES OR THE PUBLIC) | | | REQUIRES A REVISION WHICH SHOWS COMPLIANCE WITH FBC | | | 11-4.6 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2011-02-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
2011-02-14 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
2011-02-14 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2011-02-14 09:52:04 | PASSED WITH PROVISO: | | | | | | OLD BUILDING REMOVAL IS APPROX 1562 S.F. | | | NEW BUILDING/ROOF = 5260 S.F. | | | REPORT WILL BE SENT FOR DIFFERENCE OF IMPERVIOUS AREA | | | OF 3698S.F. | | | TO CITY OF WPB CUSTOMER SERVICE TO UPDATE STORMWATER | | | ACCOUNT INFORMATION. | | | | | | MANUEL JULIAN GONZALEZ | | | CSD ENGINEERING REVIEW | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | MOBILE: (561) 644-7301 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2011-01-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2011-01-10 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2011-01-10 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2011-01-10 09:34:38 | PROVIDE (RESPOND TO COMMENTS IN WRITING) : | | | | | | # 1 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (COULD BE A | | | SIGNED AND SEALED SET OF INSTRUCTIONS PROTECTING | | | STORMDRAINS, OUTFALLS, ETC.) | | | # 2. SURFACE WATER CALCULATION - 2 COPIES SIGNED AND | | | SEALED (INCLUDE SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS | | | IN ACRES AND S.F.) | | | TOTAL PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIUOUS, THIS INFORMATION WILL | | | UPDATE YOUR STORMWATER ACCOUNT AT CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH. | | | #3. ADDRESS IF ANY WATER OR SEWER OR DRAINAGE FROM | | | DEMOLISHED BUILDING NEEDS CAPPING AND/OR REMOVAL. | | | | | | ******************************************************* | | | ********** | | | | | | CITY ORDINANCE 3132-98, SECTION 32-18(A): "...IT SHALL | | | BE UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY | | | DEPOSIT, DISCHARGE, SPILL, OR DUMP INTO ANY OF THE | | | PUBLIC WATERS OR MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM | | | WITHIN THE CITY, ANY SUBSTANCE OTHER THAN THAT COMPOSED | | | ENTIRELY OF STORM WATER." AND, SECTION 32-18(C): "NO | | | PERSON MAY MAINTAIN, USE OR ESTABLISH ANY DIRECT OR | | | INDIRECT CONNECTION TO THE STORM WATER SYSTEM THAT | | | RESULTS IN ANY DISCHARGE IN VIOLATION OF THIS | | | ORDINANCE. THIS PROHIBITION IS RETROACTIVE AND APPLIES | | | TO CONNECTIONS MADE IN THE PAST, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER | | | MADE UNDER A PERMIT, OR OTHER AUTHORIZATION, OR WHETHER | | | PERMISSIBLE UNDER LAWS OR PRACTICES APPLICABLE OR | | | PREVAILING AT THE TIME THE CONNECTION WAS MADE." | | | | | | CHAPTER 62.302, F.A.C. EFFECTIVELY STATES THAT THE SITE | | | IS NOT ALLOWED TO DISCHARGE ANY QUANTITY OF WATER THAT | | | VIOLATES STATE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS. CITY ORDINANCE | | | 3132-98, SECTION 32-18(A) STATES THAT IT IS A VIOLATION | | | TO DISCHARGE ANYTHING EXCEPT STORM WATER INTO THE | | | CITY'S MS4. THE CITY HAS THE AUTHORITY AND OBLIGATION | | | TO ENFORCE THESE RESTRICTIONS. IF THE APPLICANT'S | | | PROPOSED SYSTEM IS NOT PROVIDING SUFFICIENT WATER | | | QUALITY TREATMENT (SO THAT ANY DISCHARGE IS FREE OF ALL | | | BUT STORM WATER RUNOFF), THEN APPLICANT MUST RE-DESIGN | | | THE SYSTEM. | | | | | | ******************************************************* | | | ********** | | | | | | MANUEL JULIAN GONZALEZ | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICE DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING REVIEW | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | MOBILE: (561) 644-7301 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2011-04-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2011-04-29 |
Time |
16:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2011-04-13 |
Time |
08:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2011-04-13 08:55:35 | SENT TO ZONING BOX |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2011-04-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2011-04-13 |
Time |
08:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2011-03-01 |
Time |
11:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2011-03-16 17:33:18 | SENT TO ENGINEERING IN-BOX FOR REVIEW OF PLANS THAT | | | WERE RESUBMITTED AFTER THE ENG PLAN REVIEW WAS PASSED. | | | | | 2011-03-01 11:30:23 | TO ZONING | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2011-02-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2011-02-14 |
Time |
14:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2011-01-24 |
Time |
10:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2011-01-24 10:12:30 | TO ZONING | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2010-12-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2010-09-02 |
Time |
16:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
2010-08-23 |
Time |
16:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-08-23 16:19:47 | SENT TO ZONING | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2011-04-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2011-03-11 |
Time |
14:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
shill |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2011-04-29 16:05:48 | LANDSCAPE REVIEW UNDER LANDSCAPE PERMIT #10120106 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2011-03-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2011-03-10 |
Time |
17:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2011-03-10 |
Time |
17:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2011-03-10 17:44:07 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*** | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | 1. WHEN YOU CHOOSE TO LIMIT THE PARKING STALLS TO 16 | | | FEET IN LENGTH, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO USE CURBING AND NOT | | | CARSTOPS TO TERMINATE THE PARKING STALLS. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT | | | KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2011-01-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2011-01-26 |
Time |
13:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2011-01-26 |
Time |
13:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2011-01-26 17:01:34 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*** | | | | | | 1. THE LANDSCAPE STRIP THAT RUNS EAST/WEST WHERE THE | | | CATHEDRAL OAKS ARE TO BE PLANTED IS NOT WIDE ENOUGH TO | | | SUPPORT THE ROOT BALL OF THE PROPOSED TREES OR THE | | | HEDGE. PURSUANT TO SECTION 99-443 (C) (3) (C), IF | | | DIVIDER MEDIANS ARE USED, THEY SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM | | | WIDTH OF FIVE FEET. APPARENTLY THE FENCE IS BEING | | | RELOCATED BUT THE 16 FOOT PARKING STALLS ALLOW THE | | | FRONT OF THE VEHICLES TO ENCROACH INTO THE FIVE FOOT | | | LANDSCAPE STRIP BY TWO FEET, LEAVING ONLY A THREE FOOT | | | AREA FOR THE PROPOSED HEDGE AND TREES. THE LANDSCAPE | | | STRIP MUST BE AT LEAST SEVEN FEET IN WIDTH IN ORDER TO | | | ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED TREES AND SHRUBS. THE PROPOSED | | | MIDDLE LANDSCAPE ISLAND CAN BE REDUCED IN WIDTH IF THE | | | ADDED GREEN SPACE IS PROVIDED ALONG THE STRIP. | | | | | | 2. THE SITE PLAN WILL NEED TO BE REVISED TO REFLECT | | | REQUIRED CHANGES TO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 3. A NOTE ON THE PLAN REFERENCES SHEET C-1 AND THAT | | | SHEET DOES NOT EXIST. | | | | | | ;IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT | | | KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-12-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2010-12-16 |
Time |
17:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2010-12-16 |
Time |
17:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-12-16 17:45:46 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*** | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | 1. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SUBMITTED WITH THE LANDSCAPE | | | PERMIT ARE DIFFERENT FROM THIS LANDSCAPE/SITE PLAN. ALL | | | PLANS MUST BE CONSISTENT. | | | | | | 2. REPEART COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | OF THE GREEN AREA THAT IS BEING REMOVED AND PROVIDE THE | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE GREEN AREA THAT IS BEING CREATED. | | | THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE STRIP THAT RUNS EAST/WEST (FENCE | | | LOCATION) CANNOT BE COUNTED AS AREA BEING ADDED. | | | ADDITIONAL AREA MUST BE CUT OUT TO COMPENSATE FOR THE | | | LOSS OF THE GREEN AREA AROUND THE BUIIDING. IT SHALL BE | | | SHOWN AND DIMENSIONED. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT | | | KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-09-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2010-09-02 |
Time |
13:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2010-09-03 |
Time |
12:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-09-03 12:31:32 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*** | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | 1. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY A | | | REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.. | | | | | | 2. SEPARATE PAVING,, IRRIGATION AND LANDSCAPING PERMITS | | | ARE REQUIRED. FOR THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT, PLEASE PROVIDE | | | A CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE THAT INCLUDES THE TOTAL COST | | | OF ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS AND LABOR, BROKEN DOWN INTO | | | UNIT COST. THIS SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE LANDSCAPE | | | APPLICATION AND TWO SETS OF SIGNED AND SEALED LANDSCAPE | | | PLANS. THE IRRIGATION PERMIT REQUIRES AN APPLICATION | | | AND TWO COPIES OF AN IRRIGATION PLAN.. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE GREEN AREA | | | THAT IS BEING REMOVED AND PROVIDE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF | | | THE GREEN AREA THAT IS BEING CREATED. THE EXISTING | | | LANDSCAPE STRIP THAT RUNS EAST/WEST (FENCE LOCATION) | | | CANNOT BE COUNTED AS AREA BEING ADDED. ADDITIONAL AREA | | | MUST BE CUT OUT TO COMPENSATE FOR THE LOSS OF THE GREEN | | | AREA AROUND THE BUIIDING. IT SHALL BE SHOWN AND | | | DIMENSIONED. | | | | | | 4. A TRAVEL AISLE MUST BE PROVIDED ALONG THE EAST SIDE | | | OF THE SITE TO PROVIDE FOR CIRCULATION WITHIN THE | | | PARKING LOT. THE STIPING FOR THIS ENTIRE AREA OF THE | | | LOT SHALL LINE UP AND BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED . THE | | | PARKING ROWS DO NOT LINE UP IN THIS PROPOSAL. | | | | | | 5. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-448 (D) (2), ALL ITEMS | | | ENUMERATED IN THIS SECTION SHALL BE PART OF THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. IN PARTICULAR, ALL PROPOSED TREES AND | | | SHRUBS SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AND THE QUANTITY, SIZE AND | | | SPACING SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT | | | KUSSNER @(561) 822-1462, |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2011-04-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2011-04-22 |
Time |
16:38 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2011-04-15 |
Time |
17:09 |
Sent To |
L |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2011-03-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2011-03-09 |
Time |
17:28 |
Rev Time |
0.75 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2011-03-02 |
Time |
14:18 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
| 2011-03-09 17:34:14 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT - THERE SHALL BE A DRIVE AISLE OF AT | | | LEAST 20 FEET IN WIDTH TO ALLOW ACCESS TO EACH | | | INVENTORY PARKING ROW. THIS IS NOT MEET ALONG THE EAST | | | PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN THE AISLE WHERE THE BUILDING IS | | | REMOVED AND THE AISLE WITH THE NEW LANDSCAPE ADDITIONS. | | | | | | 2) REPEAT COMMENT - THERE IS AN EXISTING LANDSCAPE | | | STRIP AT THE NORTHERN EDGE OF THE LIMITS OF WORK | | | (ADJACENT TO WHERE THE MITIGATION LANDSCAPE IS BEING | | | ADDED). THIS EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREA AND ITS SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE SHALL BE SHOWN INDEPENDENT FROM THE MITIGATION | | | LANDSCAPE AND ITS SQUARE FOOTAGE. THE PLANS SHOW | | | EXISTING LANDSCAPE BEING COUNTED AS MITIGATION | | | LANDSCAPE. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SUM OF THE LANDSCAPE | | | AREAS DO NOT MATCH THE REPLACEMENT LANDSCAPE TOTAL. | | | | | | 3) WHEEL STOPS MAY NOT BE USED TO SEPARATE THE PARKING | | | FROM THE EDGE OF THE LANDSCAPE. THIS SCENARIO REQUIRES | | | A TYPE D-CURB. THE WHEEL STOPS SHALL BE REPLACED BY | | | TYPE D-CURBING. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2011-02-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2011-02-03 |
Time |
11:53 |
Rev Time |
3.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2011-02-03 |
Time |
11:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2011-02-03 15:13:45 | FAILED | | | | | | 1) THE REVISED PAVING PLAN APPLICATION STATES THAT THE | | | PAVING PLAN MATCHES THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT NO. 10120106 WAS DENIED BY | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN REVIEWER. THERE HAS BEEN NO | | | RESUBMITTAL FOR THAT PERMIT TO ADDRESS OUTSTANDING | | | COMMENTS. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED WITH THIS PERMIT | | | DOES NOT MATCH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SUBMITTED WITH THE | | | LANDSCAPE PERMIT, NOR DOES IT ADDRESS THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN REVIEWER'S COMMENTS. | | | | | | 2) ALL PLANS FOR BOTH PERMITS SHALL MATCH AND ADDRESS | | | ALL COMMENTS. | | | | | | 3) THERE SHALL BE A DRIVE AISLE OF AT LEAST 20 FEET IN | | | WIDTH TO ALLOW ACCESS TO EACH INVENTORY PARKING ROW. | | | THIS IS NOT MEET ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE BETWEEN | | | THE AISLE WHERE THE BUILDING IS REMOVED AND THE AISLE | | | WITH THE NEW LANDSCAPE ADDITIONS. | | | | | | 4) THERE IS AN EXISTING LANDSCAPE STRIP AT THE NORTHERN | | | EDGE OF THE LIMITS OF WORK (ADJACENT TO WHERE THE | | | MITIGATION LANDSCAPE IS BEING ADDED). THIS EXISTING | | | LANDSCAPE AREA AND ITS SQUARE FOOTAGE SHALL BE SHOWN | | | INDEPENDENT FROM THE MITIGATION LANDSCAPE AND ITS | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE. THE PLANS SHOW EXISTING LANDSCAPE BEING | | | COUNTED AS MITIGATION LANDSCAPE. | | | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-12-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2010-12-15 |
Time |
14:39 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2010-12-07 |
Time |
10:56 |
Sent To |
L |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-09-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2010-08-30 |
Time |
08:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kdfreema |
Date |
2010-08-24 |
Time |
16:46 |
Sent To |
L |
|
| Notes |
| 2010-08-30 08:44:23 | ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 1. SEPARATE LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION PERMITS ARE | | | REQUIRED. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT WILL BE | | | REQUIRED TO CONTAIN TWO (2) COPIES OF A LANDSCAPE PLAN | | | MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-448(D)(2) OF THE | | | CITY'S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. THE | | | LANDSCAPE PERMIT APPLICATION SHALL ALSO CONTAIN A | | | CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE INCLUDING MATERIALS AND LABOR | | | BROKEN DOWN INTO UNIT COST. ENSURE THAT THE EXISTING | | | FENCE AND LIGHT POLES ARE SHOWN SO THAT CONFLICTS CAN | | | BE AVOIDED. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS AND DIMENSIONS TO | | | VERIFY THE AREA OF LANDSCAPE TO BE ADDED IS EQUAL OR | | | GREATER TO THE AREA OF LANDSCAPING BEING LOST AROUND | | | THE BUILDING. PLEASE INCLUDE THE LOCATION OF THE | | | EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE ON THE PLANS AS WELL AS THE | | | LIMIT OF ASPHALT ON ALL SIDES OF THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE | | | STRIP. DIFFERENTIATE THE EXISTING LANDSCAPED AREAS | | | ALONG THE FENCE LINE FROM THOSE WHICH WILL BE ADDED AS | | | A RESULT OF REMOVING ASPHALT. | | | | | | 3. ADD A NOTE THAT TYPE "D" CURB WILL BE USED AROUND | | | THE NEW PARKING LOT ISLANDS. EXTRUDED CURB IS NOT | | | PERMITTED. | | | | | | 4. THE PARKING SPACES EAST OF THE BUILDING TO BE DEMOED | | | SHOULD BE RECONFIGURED TO PROVIDE A DRIVE AISLE AT | | | LEAST 24 FEET IN WIDTH. OTHERWISE THREE LONG DEAD-END | | | ROWS WILL BE CREATED. CUSTOMERS WHO DRIVE DOWN THE ROWS | | | WILL HAVE TO BACK UP THE ENTIRE DISTANCE TO GET BACK | | | OUT AGAIN. WHILE YOU MAY CONTINUE THE USE OF THE | | | STRIPED BOX PARKING SPACES WHERE THE BUILDING WAS, THE | | | STRIPING OF THE SPACES SOUTH OF THE NEW LANDSCAPED AREA | | | NEED TO BE DOUBLE STRIPED AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | | CITY'S PARKING LOT STRIPING DETAIL. PLEASE INCLUDE A | | | COPY OF THE STRIPING DETAIL ON YOUR PLAN. | | | | | | PLEASE CONTACT KELLY FREEMAN, GIS PLANNER, AT | | | 561-822-1458 WITH ZONING-RELATED QUESTIONS AND ROBERT | | | KUSSNER, LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AT 561-822-1462 WITH | | | LANDSCAPE-RELATED QUESTIONS. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
