Plan Review Stops For Permit 10080396 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2011-04-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2011-04-15 |
Time |
08:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2011-04-15 |
Time |
08:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2011-04-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2011-04-01 |
Time |
08:47 |
Rev Time |
3.00 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2011-04-01 |
Time |
08:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-04-01 09:14:55 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 10080396 | | ADD: 2100 N FLORIDA MANGO | | CONT: TO BE DETERMINED | | CONTACT: PBA JOINT VENTURE INC | | TEL: (561)689-3745 | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2007 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2009 FBC SUPPLEMENTS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | APRIL 01/2011 | | 3RD REVIEW/ 2ND REVIEW OF 1 STORY BUILDING | | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | 1) COVERSHEET: | | | | 1A-C) COMPLIED. | | | | 2) SECOND REQUEST THE SURVEY THE FLOOD DATA IS | | BLANK!!!!!! | | , FBC BUILDING 3110.1.2 / CITY OF WPB CODE OF | | ORDINANCES SECTION 94-546. STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN AN | | "A-9" FLOOD ZONE. A FLOOD ELEVATION CERTIFICATE WILL BE | | REQUIRED. | | | | MINIMUM ELEVATION FOR FINISH FLOOR TO BE ELEVATION | | 13'-6" NGVD. | | | | FEMA FORM OMB NO. 1660-0008 EXPIRES: | | MARCH 31, 2012. | | FEMA'S NEW ELEVATION CERTIFICATE (EC) WAS APPROVED FOR | | USE, EFFECTIVE MARCH 16, 2009, THROUGH MARCH 31, 2012. | | THE NEW EC WILL BE PHASED IN ON A VOLUNTARY BASIS UNTIL | | MARCH 31, 2010. ALTHOUGH THE OLD VERSION OF THE FORM IS | | NO LONGER AVAILABLE FOR DISTRIBUTION, EXISTING COPIES | | MAY BE USED UNTIL MARCH 31, 2010. ELEVATIONS CERTIFIED | | ON OR AFTER APRIL 1, 2010, MUST BE SUBMITTED ON THE NEW | | FORM. | | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE DIFFERENCES, THE NEW | | FORM, AND INSTRUCTIONS ARE AVAILABLE AT: | | HTTP://WWW.FEMA.GOV/BUSINESS/NFIP/ELVINST.SHTM | | | | 3A) SECOND REQUEST!!!!! THIS AREA IS THE FRONT ENTRY, | | AND THE CANOPY MAY HAVE BEEN A ZONING REQUIREMENT BUT | | WILL ALSO BE USED AS A DROP OFF ZONE AS A PASSENGER | | LOADING ZONE. PLEASE REVIEW SP-1 THE PLANS INDICATE A | | PASSENGER LOADING ZONE VERSES A FLARED CURB 2007/ 2009 | | FBC-B 11-4.6.6 SEE FIGURE 11-10. | | PLEASE SEE 11-6.3 ACCESS AISLE SHALL BE STRIPED | | DIAGONALLY TO DESIGNATE IT AS A NO-PARKING ZONE.CURB | | RAMPS MUST BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE DISABLED PARKING | | SPACES AND ACCESS AISLES. PLEASE BE AWARE OF 11-4.29.5 | | DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT HAZARDOUS VEHICLAR AREAS. | | | | 3B) COMPLIED. | | | | 4) SHEET A-4.0; | | 4A) SECOND REQUEST!!! DETAILS 3 & 4 BOTH INDICATE THE | | USE OF GALVANIZED WIRE LATH OVER TYVAK WRAP, PLEASE | | REVIEW FBC-B 1404.2.1 NEW TO THE 2007 FBC A BOND BREAK | | WILL BE REQUIRED BETWEEN THE WIRE LATH AND TYVAK WRAP. | | PLEASE REVIEW THE THREE METHODS OF ACHIVING THIS, A | | PAPER BACK LATH AND TYVAK SYSTEM WILL ACHIEVE THIS | | REQUIREMENT. | | | | 4B) SECOND REQUEST!!!! THE PLANS INDICATE THE USE OF | | USE OF HORIZONTAL RIB-LATH BEING ATTACHED TO METAL HIGH | | HAT, PLEASE PROVIDE TYPE OF FASTENER AND SPACING, FBC-B | | 2510.3. ASTM C 926 AND ASTM C 1063. | | | | 4C)COMPLIED. | | | | 5-6) COMPLIED. | | | | 7) PRODUCT APPROVALS: | | 7A) SEMI-COMPLIED ENGLERT METAL ROOFING FL 11727. | | MISSING THE INSTALATION PORTION OF THE REPORT. | | | | 7B) SEMI-COMPLIED JOHNMANVILLE NOA 06-0417.09 THE SAME | | REPORT IS FILED TWICE IN THE BACK UP DOCUMENT FOLDER. | | THE ONE REPORT THAT HAS IDENTIFIED WHICH SUB-SYSTEM IS | | TO BE INSTALLED ON PAGE 15. PLEASE PROVIDE WHICH OPTION | | FOUND ON PAGE 15 IS A NON-INSULATED ROOF WILL BE | | INSTALLED. THERE ARE THREE OPTIONS . OPTION# 1 HAS LOW | | PRESSURES AND LIMITATION #9. OPTIONS 2& 3 LIMITATION# 7 | | WHICH ALLOWS FOR ENHANCED FASTENING, PLEASE CICCLE | | WHICH SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED ANAD PROVIDE CALCULATIONS | | FOR ZONES 2 & 3. | | | | 8) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT | | FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL | | PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND | | A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT | | APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | INFORMATION. | | | | INFORMATIONAL: WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. | | A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW | | COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE | | THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | JAMES A. WITMER C.B.O. | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX:(561)805-6731 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES HOME PAGE | | HTTP://WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/CONSTRUCTION/INDEX.PHP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2011-02-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2011-02-11 |
Time |
01:45 |
Rev Time |
6.00 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2011-02-11 |
Time |
07:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-02-11 14:38:05 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 10080396 | | ADD: 2100 N FLORIDA MANGO | | CONT: TO BE DETERMINED | | CONTACT: PBA JOINT VENTURE INC | | TEL: (561)689-3745 | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2007 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2009 FBC SUPPLEMENTS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | FEB. 11/ 2011 | | 2ND REVIEW/ 1ST REVIEW OF 1 STORY BUILDING | | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | 1) COVERSHEET: | | | | 1A) PLANS INDICATE THIS BUILDING TO BE FULLY FIRE | | SPRINKLERED BUT NO PLANS WERE SUBMITTED FOR THIS | | REVIEW. THE LIFE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS | | INDICATE THAT AREA INCREASES WERE TAKEN UNDER 2007 | | FBC-B 506.3. | | | | 1B) THE COVER SHEET LIFE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE | | HEADING OCCUPANCY INDICATE THIS TO BE A MIXED USE, | | NON-SEPARARTED OCCUPANCY. THE PLANS DO INDICATE A 1 | | HOUR RATED CORRIDOR FOR THE ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY, BUT | | FAIL TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT : | | 1B)(1) NO FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS SUBMITTED TO BE ABLE TO | | TAKE CREDIT FOR INCIDENTAL USE AREAS, (FBC-BTABLE 502). | | 1B)(2) THE PLANS DO NOT ADDRESS THE REQUIREMENTS FOR | | STORAGE ROOM > 100 SQ FT TO RESIST THE PASSAGE OF | | SMOKE, THE DOORS ARE TO BE SELF CLOSING OR AUTOMATIC | | CLOSING UPON DETECTION OF SMOKE IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | SECTION 715.4.7.3. | | | | 1C)THE COVER SHEET LIFE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE | | HEADING OCCUPANCY INDICATE THIS TO BE A MIXED USE, | | NON-SEPARARTED OCCUPANCY. THE PLANS DO INDICATE A 1 | | HOUR RATED CORRIDOR FOR THE ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY, BUT | | FAIL TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT : | | 1B)(1) NO FIRE SPRINKLER PLANS SUBMITTED TO BE ABLE TO | | TAKE CREDIT FOR INCIDENTAL USE AREAS, (FBC-BTABLE 502). | | 1B)(2) THE PLANS DO NOT ADDRESS THE REQUIREMENTS FOR | | STORAGE ROOM > 100 SQ FT TO RESIST THE PASSAGE OF | | SMOKE, THE DOORS ARE TO BE SELF CLOSING OR AUTOMATIC | | CLOSING UPON DETECTION OF SMOKE IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | SECTION 715.4.7.3. | | | | | | 2) SURVEY THE FLOOD DATA IS BLANK, FBC BUILDING | | 3110.1.2 / CITY OF WPB CODE OF ORDINANCES SECTION | | 94-546. STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN AN "A-9" FLOOD ZONE. A | | FLOOD ELEVATION CERTIFICATE WILL BE REQUIRED. MINIMUM | | ELEVATION FOR FINISH FLOOR TO BE ELEVATION 13'-6" NGVD. | | | | FEMA FORM OMB NO. 1660-0008 EXPIRES: | | MARCH 31, 2012. | | FEMA'S NEW ELEVATION CERTIFICATE (EC) WAS APPROVED FOR | | USE, EFFECTIVE MARCH 16, 2009, THROUGH MARCH 31, 2012. | | THE NEW EC WILL BE PHASED IN ON A VOLUNTARY BASIS UNTIL | | MARCH 31, 2010. ALTHOUGH THE OLD VERSION OF THE FORM IS | | NO LONGER AVAILABLE FOR DISTRIBUTION, EXISTING COPIES | | MAY BE USED UNTIL MARCH 31, 2010. ELEVATIONS CERTIFIED | | ON OR AFTER APRIL 1, 2010, MUST BE SUBMITTED ON THE NEW | | FORM. | | | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE DIFFERENCES, THE NEW | | FORM, AND INSTRUCTIONS ARE AVAILABLE AT: | | HTTP://WWW.FEMA.GOV/BUSINESS/NFIP/ELVINST.SHTM | | | | 3A) PLEASE REVIEW SP-1 THE PLANS INDICATE A PASSENGER | | LOADING ZONE VERSES A FLARED CURB 2007/ 2009 FBC-B | | 11-4.6.6 SEE FIGURE 11-10. | | PLEASE SEE 11-6.3 ACCESS AISLE SHALL BE STRIPED | | DIAGONALLY TO DESIGNATE IT AS A NO-PARKING ZONE.CURB | | RAMPS MUST BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE DISABLED PARKING | | SPACES AND ACCESS AISLES. PLEASE BE AWARE OF 11-4.29.5 | | DETECTABLE WARNINGS AT HAZARDOUS VEHICLAR AREAS. | | | | 3B) SHEET SP-1 ALSO INDICATES 2 HANDICAPPED SPACES BUT | | THERE IS NO CUT DETAILS FROM THE ACCESS AISLE TO | | SIDEWALK AND CURB CUTS, SHEET SP-2 INDICATES TWO STYLES | | OF CURB CUTS, WHICH TYPE IS TO BE USED FOR THIS | | INSTALATION, PLEASE KEEP IN MIND CROSS SLOPE OF AN | | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL NOT EXCEED 1:50. 2007/ 2009 | | FBC-B 11-4.3.7. PLEASE BE AWARE OF 11-4.29.5 DETECTABLE | | WARNINGS AT HAZARDOUS VEHICLAR AREAS. | | | | 4) SHEET A-4.0; | | 4A) DETAILS 3 & 4 BOTH INDICATE THE USE OF GALVANIZED | | WIRE LATH OVER TYVAK WRAP, PLEASE REVIEW FBC-B 1404.2.1 | | NEW TO THE 2007 FBC A BOND BREAK WILL BE REQUIRED | | BETWEEN THE WIRE LATH AND TYVAK WRAP. PLEASE REVIEW THE | | THREE METHODS OF ACHIVING THIS, A PAPER BACK LATH AND | | TYVAK SYSTEM WILL ACHIEVE THIS REQUIREMENT. | | | | 4B) THE PLANS INDICATE THE USE OF USE OF HORIZONTAL | | RIB-LATH BEING ATTACHED TO METAL HIGH HAT, PLEASE | | PROVIDE TYPE OF FASTENER AND SPACING, FBC-B 2510.3. | | ASTM C 926 AND ASTM C 1063. | | | | 4C) R-19 UNFACED BATT INSULATION VERSES THE ENERGY | | CALCS CELOUSE R-20 INSULATION. PLEASE ALSO REVIEW A-8.2 | | THE REQUIREMENTSPACING FOR HIHAT WHEN INSULATION BATT | | OR BLANKET IS LAIDED DIRECTLY ON TOP OF THE HI-HAT. | | | | 5) SHEET A8-0 DETAIL# 3 A 1 HOUR RATED WALL DETAIL | | INDICATES THE ROOF DECK TO BE A METAL DECK, PLEASE | | CORRECT AND PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR SYSTEM UL DESIGN NO. | | HW-D-0011 . | | | | 6) THE PLANS DO NOT PROVIDE THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT IN | | EITHER S.01 WIND DESIGN CRITERIA NOR ON S0.2 THE DESIGN | | PRESSURE TABLES, HAS THE HEIGHT FACTOR BEEN TAKEN INTO | | ACCOUNT IN THE DESIGN PRESSURES? | | | | 7) PRODUCT APPROVALS: | | 7A) FL 11727 PLEASE PROVIDE WHICH SUB-SYSTEM WILL | | INSTALLED CIRCLE SYSTEM. | | 7B) NOA 06-0417.09 PLEASE PROVIDE WHICH SUB-SYSTEM TO | | BE INSTALLED. NOTE ONLY PAGE 15 IS A NON-INSULATED ROOF | | THERE ARE THREE OPTIONS . OPTION# 1 HAS LOW PRESSURES | | AND LIMITATION #9. OPTIONS 2& 3 LIMITATION# 7 WHICH | | ALLOWS FOR ENHANCED FASTENING, PLEASE CICCLE WHICH | | SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED ANAD PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR | | ZONES 2 & 3. | | | | 8) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT | | FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL | | PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND | | A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT | | APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | INFORMATION. | | | | INFORMATIONAL: WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. | | A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW | | COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE | | THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | JAMES A. WITMER C.B.O. | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX:(561)805-6731 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES HOME PAGE | | HTTP://WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/CONSTRUCTION/INDEX.PHP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-08-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2010-08-26 |
Time |
07:31 |
Rev Time |
4.33 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2010-08-23 |
Time |
09:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-08-26 13:37:22 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 10080396 | | ADD: 2100 N FLORIDA MANGO | | CONT: TO BE DETERMINED | | CONTACT: PBA JOINT VENTURE INC | | TEL: (561)689-3745 | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2007 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2009 FBC SUPPLEMENTS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | AUGUST 26/2010 | | 1ST REVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | 1) NOTE PAARKING, LANDSCAPE, GENERATORS AND COVERED | | PARKING STRUCTURE REQUIRE SEPERATE PERMITS, REVIEWS, | | FEES AND APPLICATIONS. | | | | 2) A/C CONDENSOR PADS AND GENERATOR PADS ARE LOCATED | | WITHIN A A-9 FLOOD ZONE REQUIRING A MINIMUM BASE FLOOD | | ELEVATION OF 13'-6", TO BE INCLUDED ON THE FINAL | | SURVEY. | | THE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION TO BE AT A MINIMUM OF 13'-6" | | AND WILL REQUIRE SURVEYS WITH ELEVATION OF THE FIRST | | FLOOR LEVEL AT TIME OF FIRST FLOOR SLAB POUR AND AT | | FINAL BEFORE A C.C. OR C.O CAN BE ISSUED. | | | | 3) SHEET LS1 THE SOUTH EXIT STAIR #102 IS WITHIN A 1 | | HOUR ENCLOSURE THAT EXITS INTO A UNRATED LOBBY# 100 AND | | CONTAINING A ELEVATOR. AS DISCUSSED WITH B O DOUG WISE | | THIS CONDITION DOES MEET THE EXCEPTION 1020.1 EXCEPTION | | # 8. WE CONTACTED GS&P OFFICE MIKE ROSSIN ABOUT THE | | ISSUE OF THE LOBBY STILL REQUIRING A ONE HOUR FIRE | | RATING BECAUSE OF IT BEING THE EXIT CORRIDOR FOR THE | | LOUGE #112. THE LOUGE HAS AN ASSEMBLY OCCUPANT LOAD OF | | GREATER THAN 30 WHICH REQUIRES A 1 HR FIRE RATING PER | | TABLE 1017.1. | | WHEN WE SPOKE WITH MR. ROSSIN HE SUGESTED THEY WILL | | MAKE ONE OF THE TWO WINDOWS INTO THE 2ND EXIT FOR THIS | | SPACE ALLOWING THE LOBBY TO REMAIN UNRATED, PLANS WILL | | NEED TO BE UPDATED TO REFLECT THIS CHANGE. PLEASE BE | | AWARE OF A ONE FOOT ELEVATION CHANGE FROM THE NEW EXIT | | LANDING CREATED BY THIS DOORWAY AND SIDEWALK AND THE | | ELECTRICAL ROOM 136 LOCATED AT ELEVATION 14.91 NGVD. | | SHEET A1.1. | | | | 4) PLEASE NOTE 11-4.1.3(8)(II) ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES | | MUST BE PROVIDED IN A NUMBER AT LEAST EQUIVALENT TO THE | | NUMBER OF EXITS REQUIRED BY THE APPLICABLE BUILDING / | | FIRE CODES. | | | | 5) ANOTHER AREA OF CONCERN IS THE FRONT ENTRY SHEET | | A1.1. PLEASE REVIEW THTE CROSS SLOPE, THE AREA JUST IN | | FRONT OF THE EGRESS DOORS INDICATES A ELEVATION OF | | 15.91 NGVD AND A SECOND ELEVATION OF THE SIDEWALK | | 12'-0" AWAY ADJACENT TO THE CURB A ELEVATION OF 15'-41" | | OR A GRADE CHANGE OF 6 INCHES IN 12'-0". 11-4.3.7 CROSS | | SLOPE ONLY ALLOWS A CROSS SLOPE 0F 1:50. | | | | 6) SHEET A.20 PORTABLE STAGE DOE NOT INDICATE VERTICAL | | ACCESSIBLITY,11-4.1.6(1)(K)(III). | | | | 7) SHEET A2.1 & A2.2 DORRWAYS LEADING TO EXTERIOR DECKS | | INDICATE A CUT SECTION 3/A6.1 WHEN YOU GO THERE IT | | REFERES YOU TO DETAIL 8/A3.0 A WALL SECTION , PLEASE | | PROVIDE A SECTION THROUGH AT TTHE DOOR FOR ACCESSIBILTY | | REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE ALSO INCLUDE WHICH OF THE PRODUCT | | APPROVALS THIS WILL BE. 11-4.13.8. | | | | 8) SHEET A-3.0 THE ROOF PLAN AND DETAILS INDICATE TWO | | WALKABLE DECKS WITH ROOF DRAINS & NO OVER FLOWS THE | | DETAILS INDICATE THE ROOF DRAIN IS AT ELEVATION 17'-8" | | AS WELL AS THE PARAPET WALL WHICH WOULD ALLOW THE WATER | | TO OVERFLOW DOWN THE SIDE OF THE WALL. PLEASE SEE FBC-B | | 1503.6. GUTTERS WITH DOWNSPOUTS ARE REQUIRED ON ALL | | BUILDINGS WITH EAVES OF LESS THAN 6 INCHES (152 MM) | | HORIZONTAL PROJECTION EXCEPT FOR GABLE END RAKES OR ON | | A ROOF ABOVE ANOTHER ROOF. | | | | 9) SHEET A-6.1 NOTE UPPER RIGHT HAND CORNER OF PLAN | | INDICATES "LIGHT -WEIGHT CONCRETE ON METAL DECK W/ | | AVERAGE R-30 VALUE. THE TERM AVERAGE CAN NOT BE USED. | | THERE ARE THREE INFORMAL INTERPRETATIONS THROUGH BOAF ( | | BUILDING OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION OF FLORIDA THAT ARE | | RECOGNIZED THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS | | THAT IS EXPLICITE THE MINIMUM R-VALUE IS TO OCCUR AT | | THE ROOF DRAINS NOT A AVERAGE. | | SECTION 13-404.1ABCD.1 REPORT 3746 | | SECTION 13-404 REPORT 3731 | | SECTION 13-404.1.A REPORT 5438 | | | | 10) SHEET A-6.0 & A-6.1 BOTH HAVE WALL SECTIONS THAT | | INDICATE THE USE OF WIRE LATH OVER GRACE ICE/WATER | | MEMBRANE, THE CODE INDICATES A CHANGE IN 1404.2.1 | | REQUIRING A SEPERATE BOND BREAK BETWEEN THE WATER | | RESISTIVE BARRIER AND THE CEMENT PLASTER (STUCCO). | | PLEASE REVIEW THE 3 OPTIONS. | | | | 11) SHEET A-6.4 PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE WITH 11-4.4.2 | | WHEN THERE IS LESS THAN 80 INCHES ( VERTICAL NOMINAL | | DIMENSION) HEAD ROOM, A BARRIER TO WARN BLIND OR | | VISUALLY - IMPAIRED PERSONS. | | | | 12) THIS SAME SHEET A-6.4 INDICATES A HANDRAIL AT THE | | BOTTOM OF THE STAIR THE HANDRAIL THAT IS NOT ATTACHED | | TO THE WALL, THE HORIZONTAL EXTENSION WILL NEED TO WRAP | | BACK ONTO ITSELF AS PER 11-4.8.5(6) ENDS OF HANDRAILS | | SHALL BE EITHER ROUNDED OR RETURNED SMOOTHLY TO FLOOR, | | WALL, OR POST. ALSO SEE 11-4.4.1 PROTRUDING OBJECTS. | | | | 13) IN NONE OF THE STAIR DETAILS IN A-6.2, A-6.3 & | | A-6.4 INDICATE ROOF DRAINS WITHIN THE STAIRWELL, THE | | PLUMBING PLANS INDICATE A 3" RAIN WATER PIPE. THE | | ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS INDICATE A LAY IN CEILING SYSTEM. | | FBC-B 1020.1.2 PENETRATIONS INTO THE STAIRWELL CAN ONLY | | WHAT IS REQUIRED FOR THE STAIRWELL. PLEASE PROVIDE | | DOCUMENTATION THAT THE LAY IN CEILING WILL HAVE A 1 | | HOUR FIRE RATING, PROVIDE MANUFACTURERS SPEC ON THE | | CEILING TILE AND GRID SYSTEM FOR RATING. | | | | 14) PRODUCT APPROVAL: YKK "#%" ALUMINUM OUTSWING | | ENTRANCE DOOR NOA 09-0518.09 PLEASE CIRCLE TYPE OF | | GLASS TO BE INSTALLED, NOTE DESIGN PRESSURES TO BE | | DIVIDED BY 1.33. | | | | 15) PRODUCT APPROVAL SIPLAST NOA 09-0901.14 PLEASE | | PROVIDE WHICH SUB-SYSTEM IS TO BE INSTALLED ON THE | | ROOF, PLEASE ALSO BE AWARRE OF LIMITATIONS WITHIN EACH | | SUB-SYSTEM. | | LIMITATION #7 INDICATES ENHANCED FASTENING CAN OCCUR | | USING RAS 117 BY DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. | | LIMITATION #9 THE MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES INDICATED | | ARE FOR ALL ROOF ZONES, NO ENHANCED FASTENING ALLOWED. | | | | 16) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT | | FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL | | PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND | | A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT | | APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | INFORMATION. | | | | INFORMATIONAL: WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. | | A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW | | COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE | | THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | STARTING AUGUST 21, 2009, THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES | | DEPARTMENT WILL BE CLOSED ON FRIDAYS UNTIL FURTHER | | NOTICE. | | | | OPENING HOURS MONDAY - THURSDAY WILL REMAIN AT 8:00 AM | | - 5:00 PM. | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLAN REVIEW | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO COMPLETE OUR ANONYMOUS ON-LINE | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SURVEY AT: | | WWW.SURVEYMONKEY.COM/WESTPALMBEACHCONSTRUCTIONSERVICES | | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES HOME PAGE | | HTTP://WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/CONSTRUCTION/INDEX.PHP | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. | | | | MEMBER OF BOAF: BUILDING OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION OF | | FLORIDA SAVING LIVES AND PROPERTY SINCE 1953 | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2011-03-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rlecky |
Date |
2011-03-28 |
Time |
13:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rlecky |
Date |
2011-03-28 |
Time |
13:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2011-03-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rlecky |
Date |
2011-02-24 |
Time |
14:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rlecky |
Date |
2011-02-23 |
Time |
15:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-02-24 09:16:21 | SHEET 053 E1-2 | | PLEASE PROVIDE A SPECIFICATION FOR THE LIGHT POLE | | DESIGN AND FOUNDATION. | | | | SHEET 055 E3-1 | | GFCI PROTECTION IS REQUIRED FOR RECEPTACLES WITHIN 6 | | FEET OF THE BAR SINK. NEC 210.8(B)(5) | | | | SHEET 056 E5-1 | | MINIMUM SIZE SERVICE GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR HAS | | BEEN MISLABELED ON THE RISER DIAGRAM. NEC T. 250.66 | | PANEL A AND B FEEDER OVERCURRENT PROTECTION SHOULD BE | | NO GREATER THAN THE PANELBOARD RATING. NEC 408.36 | | | | | | ROBERT LECKY, ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW, 561-805-6718 | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-09-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleahy |
Date |
2010-09-21 |
Time |
06:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jleahy |
Date |
2010-09-21 |
Time |
06:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2011-05-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2011-05-10 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.50 |
Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2011-05-10 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-05-10 16:06:17 | PLANS IN PROJECT DOX APPEAR TO BE AS PER LATEST | | SUBMITTAL TO ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2011-05-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2011-05-17 |
Time |
10:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2011-05-17 |
Time |
10:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-05-17 10:34:07 | PLANS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED IN PROJECT DOX. |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2011-04-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2011-04-04 |
Time |
07:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2011-04-04 |
Time |
07:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-04-04 07:34:18 | 2100 NORTH FLORIDA MANGO ROAD | | PERMIT NUMBER 10080396 | | | | 1. THE SIGN WITH THE MALTESE CROSS WITH THE LETTER R | | NEEDS TO BE INSTALLED ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING. | | (A-1.0) | | | | 2. COULD NOT LOCATE ANY FIRE SPRINKLER DRAWINGS WITH | | THE PLANS. | | | | 3. THE CANOPY WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE FIRE SPRINKLER | | PROTECTED IN COMBUSTIBLES ARE TO BE STORED OR HANDLED. | | SOME OF IT APPEARS TO BE COMBUSTIBLE. | | | | | | | | MIKE CARSILLO, BATTALION CHIEF | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2011-02-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2011-02-16 |
Time |
14:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2011-02-16 |
Time |
14:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-02-16 14:22:27 | 2100 NORTH FLORIDA MANGO ROAD | | PERMIT NUMBER 10080396 | | | | | | 1. TACTILE SIGNAGE REQUIRED AT ALL EXIT DOOR LOCATIONS. | | | | 2. A KNOX-BOX AND KNOX LOCKING CAPS WILL BE REQUIRED | | FOR THE PROJECT. | | | | 3. SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS REQUIRED FOR FIRE ALARM | | SYSTEM INSTALLATION. THE FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND FIRE | | ALARM SYSTEM SHALL BE MONITORED BY A THIRD PARTY | | APPROVED FOR CENTRAL STATION SERVICE. | | | | 4. FIRE ALARM STROBE MISSING FROM RESTROOM 44. | | | | 5. NOTE # 17 IS INCORRECT ON SHEET FAO.1. DUCT SMOKE | | DETECTORS WHEN ACTIVATED SHALL CAUSE THE BUILDING FIRE | | ALARM TO ACTIVATE. | | | | 6. SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE HOOD, | | DUCT, AND FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM. | | | | 7. ALL NEW FIRE AND SMOKE DAMPERS ARE TO BE DROP TESTED | | AFTER INSTALLATION TO ENSURE PROPER FUNCTION. | | | | 8. THE KEYPAD/ACCESS CONTROL FOR DOOR DEVICES SHOWN ON | | SHEET A-1.O SHALL NOT INTERFERE WITH EXITING. | | | | 9. SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS REQUIRED FOR GENERATOR. | | | | 10. A MALTESE CROSS IDENTIFIED WITH THE LETTER R IS TO | | BE PROVIDED NEAR THE MAIN DOOR SIGNIFYING THAT A WOOD | | TRUSS IS PRESENT. | | | | | | MIKE CARSILLO, BATTALION CHIEF | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-09-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
wjolin |
Date |
2010-09-15 |
Time |
10:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
wjolin |
Date |
2010-09-09 |
Time |
10:08 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2010-09-14 18:26:50 | *****REVIEW COMMENTS - FIRE***** | | | | WATER PLAN 6 OF 9: SHIFT FIRE HYDRANT, BACKFLOW | | PREVENTER, AND FDC 30-FEET TO THE SOUTH TO AVOID | | DAMAGED FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT IN A WALL COLLAPSE | | EVENT SINCE 40-FEET OF CLEARANCE CANNOT BE MAINTAINED | | BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND EQUIPMENT. POSSIBLE SHIFT MAY | | AFFECT LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | WATER PLAN 7 OF 9: ADDRESS SHOULD READ "2100 NORTH | | FLORIDA MANGO ROAD." | | | | WATER DETAILS 8 OF 9: BACKFLOW PREVENTER SHALL BE UL | | LISTED FOR FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS. PROVIDE TAMPER | | SWITCHES ON GATES VALVES. CHAIN/LOCK GATE VALVES IN | | OPEN POSITION. PROVIDE CHECK VALVE AND LOCKABLE KNOX | | CAPS ON FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION. | | | | SHEET D-1.0: DEMOLITION SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 241. | | | | SHEET LS-1: | | - FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE SHOULD BE THE 2007 | | EDITION. | | - DOOR SWINGS BLOCK MORE THAN 50% OF EXISTING CORRIDORS | | #116 AND #124 PER 7.2.1.4.4 OF NFPA 101. | | - NORTH STAIR INTERMEDIATE LANDING DECREASES IN WIDTH | | NEAR LOWER LANDING. | | - PROVIDE TACTILE SIGNAGE AT FIRST FLOOR EXITS. | | | | SHEET LS-2: IF BOTH DOORS OF ROOMS #219 AND #220 ARE | | OPEN AT THE SAME TIME, MORE THAN 50% OF THE GALLERY | | CORRIDOR IS OBSTRUCTED. | | | | SHEET A-2: | | - FESTIVAL SEATING IN ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES WITH | | OCCUPANT LOADS GREATER THAN 250 PERSONS REQUIRE AN | | APPROVED LIFE SAFETY EVALUATION PER 12.2.5.4 OF NFPA | | 101. | | - MOVEABLE CHAIRS ARE REQUIRED TO BE SECURED TOGETHER | | IN GROUPS OF 3-7 PER 12.7.9.1.1 OR IF CHAIRS ARE NOT | | SECURED TOGETHER, AN AREA OF 15 SQ.FT. PER SEAT IS | | REQUIRED PER 12.7.9.2.2 OF NFPA 101. | | - ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES GREATER THAN 250 OCCUPANTS | | REQUIRE CROWD MANAGERS PER 12.7.6 AND FIRE DRILLS PER | | 12.7.7 OF NFPA 101. | | - THE OCCUPANT LOAD OF THE ASSEMBLY SPACE SHALL BE | | POSTED NEAR THE MAIN ENTRANCE/EXIT OF THE ROOM PER | | 12.7.9.3 OF NFPA 101. | | | | SHEET E1.01A: MAIN ENTRANCE FEATURES A "REQUEST TO | | EXIT" BUTTON. ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF 7.2.1.6.2 (NFPA | | 101) TO BE MET FOR ACCESS-CONTROLLED EGRESS DOORS. | | | | SHEET FA1.01A: | | - THE FIRE ALARM CONTROL PANEL (ELECTRICAL #136) IS | | SHOWN IN A DIFFERENT LOCATION FROM ELECTRICAL SHEET | | E1.02B (ROOM #216). COORDINATE LOCATION. | | - DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS SHALL INITIATE A GENERAL FIRE | | ALARM CONDITION. | | - SMOKE DETECTOR AT TOP OF ELEVATOR SHAFT NOT PERMITTED | | UNLESS AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER IS PROTECTING TOP OF | | ELEVATOR SHAFT. | | | | GENERAL: | | - SIGNED/SEALED FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS | | PER FAC 61G15-32.001 ARE REQUIRED FOR A BUILDING | | PERMIT. | | - PROVIDE KNOX KEY SWITCH TO ALLOW FIRE DEPARTMENT | | ACCESS THROUGH ELECTRIC GATE | | | | MIKE CARSILLO, BATTALION CHIEF | | & WESLEY JOLIN | | WPB FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6730 | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2011-03-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2011-03-04 |
Time |
15:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2011-02-08 |
Time |
16:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-02-08 16:21:21 | **DIGITAL PLANS** SEE PROJECTDOX |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
|
Date |
2010-09-20 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2010-08-17 |
Time |
10:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2011-09-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2011-09-21 |
Time |
13:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2011-09-21 |
Time |
13:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-09-21 13:51:45 | IMPACT FEES; | | RECEIPT NUMBER: MU-2011-003746-0000 | | $23,214.90 |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2011-04-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2011-04-15 |
Time |
08:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2011-04-15 |
Time |
08:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-04-15 08:48:13 | BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT | | FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL | | PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND | | A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT | | APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | INFORMATION. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
|
Date |
2011-05-12 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
|
Date |
2011-05-12 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-05-12 13:54:23 | SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMIT REQUIRED PER RKUSSNER. |
|
|
Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2011-03-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2011-03-31 |
Time |
09:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2011-03-31 |
Time |
09:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-03-31 09:59:01 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*** | | | | 1. LANDSCAPING IS REQUIRED TO BE PERMITTED SEPARATELY. | | PLEASE SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PERMIT APPLICATION WITH TWO | | COPIES OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. A CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE | | THAT INCLUDES THE TOTAL COST OF ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS | | AND LABOR BROKEN DOWN INTO UNIT COST SHALL BE SUBMITTED | | WITH THE APPLICATION. LANDSCAPE WILL BE REVIEWED ONCE | | WE RECEIVE THE SEPARATE LANDSCAPE PERMIT. | | | | 2. IRRIGATION IS ALSO REQUIRED TO BE PERMITTED | | SEPARATELY. PLEASE SUBMIT AN IRRIGATION APPLICATION AND | | TWO SETS OF IRRIGATION PLANS. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT | | KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462, |
|
|
Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2011-02-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2011-02-15 |
Time |
15:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2011-02-15 |
Time |
15:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-02-15 15:31:47 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*** | | | | 1. LANDSCAPING IS REQUIRED TO BE PERMITTED SEPARATELY. | | PLEASE SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PERMIT APPLICATION WITH TWO | | COPIES OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. A CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE | | THAT INCLUDES THE TOTAL COST OF ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS | | AND LABOR BROKEN DOWN INTO UNIT COST SHALL BE SUBMITTED | | WITH THE APPLICATION. | | | | 2. IRRIGATION IS ALSO REQUIRED TO BE PERMITTED | | SEPARATELY. PLEASE SUBMIT AN IRRIGATION APPLICATION AND | | TWO SETS OF IRRIGATION PLANS. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT | | KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462, |
|
|
Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-09-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2010-09-02 |
Time |
11:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2010-09-02 |
Time |
11:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-09-02 11:51:33 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*** | | | | 1. LANDSCAPING IS REQUIRED TO BE PERMITTED SEPARATELY. | | PLEASE SUBMIT A LANDSCAPE PERMIT APPLICATION WITH TWO | | COPIES OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. A CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE | | THAT INCLUDES THE TOTAL COST OF ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS | | AND LABOR BROKEN DOWN INTO UNIT COST SHALL BE SUBMITTED | | WITH THE APPLICATION. | | | | 2. IRRIGATION IS ALSO REQUIRED TO BE PERMITTED | | SEPARATELY. PLEASE SUBMIT AN IRRIGATION APPLICATION AND | | TWO SETS OF IRRIGATION PLANS. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT | | KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462, |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2011-04-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2011-04-15 |
Time |
15:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2011-04-15 |
Time |
15:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-04-15 15:36:25 | **PROVISO** | | | | STORAGE ROOM 019 IS NOT PERMITTED TO BE USED FOR MOTOR | | VEHICLE ENTRY OR STORAGE. THE VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS | | OF FBC-M SECTION 404 HAVE NOT BEEN MET FOR GARAGE | | VENTILATION. A NOTE FROM THE OWNER ACKNOWLEDGING THE | | SAME HAS BEEN SUBMITTED. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | 561.805.6719 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2011-03-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2011-03-30 |
Time |
14:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2011-03-30 |
Time |
10:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-03-30 14:44:03 | REVIEW #: 2ND (FOR NEWLY DESIGNED BUILDING) | | ACTION:DENIED | | | | FBC 2007 CODE FAMILY W/ 2009 SUPPLEMENTS | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | THESE COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH PREVIOUS | | REVIEW FOR CONTINUITY. ANY ADDITIONAL NEW COMMENTS WILL | | BE ADDED TO THE END OF THE REVIEW. | | | | 1. OK | | | | 2. OK | | | | 3. OK | | | | 4. EF-3 AND EF-5 ON PAGE M6-1 APPEAR TO HAVE THE ROOM | | NUMBER AND THE CFM REVERSED. PLEASE CORRECT TO | | CORRESPOND WITH THE FLOOR PLAN. FBC-M 304.11. | | | | 5. OK | | | | 6. OK | | | | 7. OK | | | | 8. OK | | | | 9. OK | | | | 10. OK | | | | 11. OK | | | | 12. OK | | | | 13. NOT ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED: FBC-M SECTION 404 | | REQUIRES A MINIMUM VENTILATION RATE OF 1.5 CFM/SQ.FT. | | THE VENTILATION RATE IS ALLOWED TO BE INTERMITTENT IF | | THE FAN IS CONTROLLED BY CARBON MONOXIDE SENSORS. PAGE | | M2-1 SHOWS THE FAN BEING CONTROLLED BY CARBON DIOXIDE | | SENSORS. THIS DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT OF THE CODE | | FOR AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE. ALSO, SECTION 404 | | REQUIRES THAT IF INTERMITTENT VENTILATION IS USED, A | | MINIMUM CONTINUOUS VENTILATION RATE OF 0.05 CFM/SQ.FT | | BE PROVIDED. SHOW HOW THIS MINIMUM CONTINUOUS RATE IS | | TO BE PROVIDED. IN ADDITION, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE | | INTAKE LOUVER? NO SIZE IS GIVEN ON THE PLANS. THE SIZE | | MUST BE LARGE ENOUGH TO PROVIDE AT LEAST 1000 CFM OF | | MAKE-UP AIR FOR THE EXHAUST FAN BEING PROPOSED. | | | | NOTE: PROVIDE SIZES FOR ALL OUTDOOR LOUVERS. | | | | 14. NEW COMMENT: AHU-10 RETURN AIR SYSTEM IS | | REDESIGNED, ELIMINATING DUCTED RETURN AND UTILIZING | | TRANSFER DUCTS FROM OFFICES INTO ADJACENT HALL 37. | | THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE A CENTRALIZED R/A INTAKE | | ASSOCIATED WITH AHU-10 LARGE ENOUGH TO DRAW ALL THE | | RETURN AIR FROM THESE TRANSFER DUCTS BACK TO THE AHU. | | PLEASE SHOW HOW BALANCED RETURN IS TO BE ACHIEVED IN | | THIS AREA PER FBC-M 601.4. ALSO, THE TRANSFER DUCTS | | FROM THE OFFICE ARE NOT SIZED PER THE BALANCED RETURN | | AIR EXCEPTIONS UNDER FBC-M 601.4. THE TRANSFER DUCT | | MUST BE MINIMUM 1.5 TIMES THE SIZE OF THE SUPPLY DUCT. | | IN MOST CASES THE PLAN SHOWS A DUCT WITH APPROXIMATELY | | THE SAME SQUARE INCHES. SHOW HOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-M | | 601.4 IS TO BE ACHIEVED IN THESE AREAS. | | | | NOTE: THE KITCHEN HOOD EXHAUST SYSTEM IS EXCLUDED FROM | | THE SCOPE OF THIS REVIEW. SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMIT | | APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE HOOD SYSTEM AND THE | | FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | 561.805.6719 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2011-02-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2011-02-15 |
Time |
15:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2011-02-08 |
Time |
16:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-02-15 15:54:09 | REVIEW #: 1ST (FOR NEWLY DESIGNED BUILDING) | | ACTION:DENIED | | | | FBC 2007 CODE FAMILY W/ 2009 SUPPLEMENTS | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | 1. SOME DUCTS PENETRATING THE SMOKE PARTITION AT | | STORAGE ROOM 18 AND A/V 17 ARE SHOWN WITH SMOKE DAMPERS | | WHILE OTHERS ARE NOT. DESIGN INTENT IS NOT CLEAR. IN | | SMOKE PARTITIONS, SMOKE DAMPERS ARE ONLY REQUIRED IN | | AIR TRANSFER OPENINGS AND ARE NOT REQUIRED AT DUCT | | PENETRATIONS PER FBC-B 710.7. | | | | 2. RETURN DUCT SERVING ROOM A/V 17 IS MISSING SIZE, CFM | | AND GRILL DESIGNATION. PROVIDE MISSING INFO ON PLANS | | PER FBC-M 603.1. | | | | 3. DUCTS PENETRATING THE FIRE RATED CORRIDOR SHALL BE | | PROTECTED WITH FIRE AND SMOKE DAMPERS PER FBC-M 607.5.3 | | AND 607.5.4. | | | | 4. TWO FANS MARKED AS EF-3 ON FLOOR PLAN AND ON THE FAN | | SCHEDULE, BUT THEY DO NOT SHOW THE SAME CFM ON THE | | FLOOR PLAN. PLEASE COORDINATE FLOOR PLANS AND | | SCHEDULES. CONSIDER NAMING EACH FAN INDIVIDUALLY TO | | INDICATE THE AREAS BEING SERVED BY EACH PER FBC-M | | 304.11. | | | | 5. RESTROOMS 39 AND 40 SERVE A LARGE ASSEMBLY SPACE AND | | SHALL BE CAPABLE OF PROVIDING A HIGHER VENTILATION RATE | | DURING PEAK USAGE TIMES OF 70 CFM PER WATER CLOSET | | AND/OR URINAL PER ASHRAE 62.1 TABLE 6-4, NOTE D. THE | | SIX FIXTURES IN THE MEN'S WOULD REQUIRE 420 CFM AND THE | | 7 IN THE WOMEN'S WOULD REQUIRE 490 CFM DURING PEAK | | USAGE TIMES. A LOWER RATE OF 50 CFM PER FIXTURE MAY BE | | PROVIDED (300 CFM MEN'S AND 350 CFM WOMEN'S) DURING | | LOWER USAGE TIMES. | | | | 6. THE EXHAUST FAN SERVING ROOM JANITOR 22 HAS NO DATA, | | IS NOT LABELED ON PLANS AND DOES NOT APPEAR ON FAN | | SCHEDULE. PROVIDE MISSING DATA PER FBC-M 501.1. | | | | 7. AHU-5 ON SCHEDULE CALLS FOR 1800 CFM WHILE THE FLOOR | | PLAN CALLS FOR 1925 CFM. WHICH IS CORRECT? COORDINATE | | FLOOR PLANS AND SCHEDULES. FBC-M 603.1. | | | | 8. AHU-7 ON SCHEDULE CALLS FOR 1800 CFM WHILE THE FLOOR | | PLAN CALLS FOR 1975 CFM. WHICH IS CORRECT? COORDINATE | | FLOOR PLANS AND SCHEDULES. FBC-M 603.1. | | | | 9. AHU-7 ON FLOOR PLAN SHOWS 1975 CFM OF SUPPLY AND | | 2000 CFM OF RETURN. HOW WILL OUTSIDE AIR BE INTRODUCED | | IF THE SYSTEM IS DESIGNED TO RETURN 100% OF THE SUPPLY | | QUANTITY? THIS CONDITION APPEARS ON SEVERAL SYSTEMS. | | THIS WOULD ALSO CREATE A NEGATIVE PRESSURE. BUILDINGS | | SHALL BE PRESSURIZEDIN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC-B | | 13-409.AB.2. SHOW HOW VENTILATION AIR IS TO BE | | INTRODUCED INTO EACH OF THESE SYSTEMS PER FBC-M 401.1. | | | | 10. AHU-8 ON SCHEDULE CALLS FOR 1800 CFM WHILE THE | | FLOOR PLAN CALLS FOR 2075 CFM. WHICH IS CORRECT? | | COORDINATE FLOOR PLANS AND SCHEDULES. FBC-M 603.1. | | ALSO, SUPPLY AIR SYSTEMS EXCEEDING 2000 CFM SHALL BE | | PROVIDED WITH FAN SHUT-DOWN BY SMOKE DETECTOR PER FBC-M | | 606.2.1. | | | | 11. AHU-9 ON SCHEDULE CALLS FOR 1800 CFM WHILE THE | | FLOOR PLAN CALLS FOR 2000 CFM PLUS ONE GRILL SERVING | | ROOM RECEPTION 49 WHICH IS MISSING CFM AND GRILL | | DESIGNATION. WHICH IS CORRECT? COORDINATE FLOOR PLANS | | AND SCHEDULES. PROVIDE MISSING GRILL DATA. FBC-M 603.1. | | ALSO, SUPPLY AIR SYSTEMS EXCEEDING 2000 CFM SHALL BE | | PROVIDED WITH FAN SHUT-DOWN BY SMOKE DETECTOR PER FBC-M | | 606.2.1. | | | | 12. AHU-11 ON SCHEDULE CALLS FOR 1800 CFM WHILE THE | | FLOOR PLAN CALLS FOR 2075 CFM. WHICH IS CORRECT? | | COORDINATE FLOOR PLANS AND SCHEDULES. FBC-M 603.1. | | ALSO, SUPPLY AIR SYSTEMS EXCEEDING 2000 CFM SHALL BE | | PROVIDED WITH FAN SHUT-DOWN BY SMOKE DETECTOR PER FBC-M | | 606.2.1. | | | | 13. STORAGE ROOM 19 IS CONFIGURED FOR VEHICLE | | ENTRY/PARKING. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE SHALL BE | | PROVIDED WITH MECHANICAL VENTILATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | FBC-M SECTION 404. | | | | NOTE: THE KITCHEN HOOD EXHAUST SYSTEM IS EXCLUDED FROM | | THE SCOPE OF THIS REVIEW. SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMIT | | APPLICATIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE HOOD SYSTEM AND THE | | FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | 561.805.6719 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-09-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2010-09-16 |
Time |
17:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2010-09-16 |
Time |
14:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-09-16 17:03:54 | REVIEW #: 1ST | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | FBC 2007 CODE FAMILY W/ 2009 SUPPLEMENTS | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | 1. PG M1.01A: OFFICE 107 SHOWS A TRANSFER DUCT FOR | | BALANCED RETURN. WHILE THE TRANSFER DUCT IS PROPERLY | | SIZED UNDER EXCEPTION 1 OF FBC-M 601.4, A ONE INCH | | UNDERCUT DOOR IS ALSO REQUIRED. THE LOCATION OF THE | | DOOR IN THIS ROOM DOES NOT COMMUNICATE WITH THE | | CENTRALIZED RETURN OF THE AHU SERVING THIS ROOM. SHOW | | HOW BALANCED RETURN IS TO BE ACHIEVED IN THIS AREA PER | | FBC-M 601.4. | | | | 2. PG M1.01A: BREAK ROOM 111 SHOWS A TRANSFER DUCT FOR | | BALANCED RETURN. THE TRANSFER DUCT SHOWN IS NOT | | PROPERLY SIZED UNDER ECEPTION 1 OF FBC-M 601.4, WHICH | | REQUIRES THE TRANSFER DUCT TO BE MINIMUM 1.5 TIMES THE | | AREA OF THE SUPPLY DUCT. THE TWO 10 INCH SUPPLY DUCTS | | SERVING THIS ROOM HAVE A TOTAL OF 157 SQUARE INCHES. IN | | ORDER TO MEET THE EXCEPTION, THE TRANSFER DUCT MUST | | HAVE A MINIMUM CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA OF 235.5 SQUARE | | INCHES, PLUS A 1 INCH UNDERCUT AT THE DOOR. SHOW HOW | | BALANCED RETURN IS TO BE ACHIEVED IN THIS ROOM PER | | FBC-M 601.4. | | | | 3. PG M1.01A AND P1.01A: CONDENSATE FOR AHU-5 IS SHOWN | | DISCHARGING ONTO A CONCRETE WALKWAY. THIS LOCATION WILL | | CAUSE A NUISANCE AND A HAZARDOUS CONDITION FOR | | PEDESTRIANS. CONDENSATE SHALL BE CONVEYED FROM THE | | DRAIN PAN OUTLET TO AN APPROVED PLACE OF DISPOSAL. | | CONDENSATE SHALL NOT DISCHARGE INTO A STREET, ALLEY OR | | OTHER AREAS SO AS TO CAUSE A NUISANCE PER FBC-M | | 307.2.1. | | | | 4. PG M1.02A: VESTIBULE 200 IS SERVING AS PART OF A | | FIRE RATED EXIT ACCESS CORRIDOR. THE 18X10 AND 16X10 | | SUPPLY DUCT PENETRATIONS AT THIS LOCATION ARE REQUIRED | | TO BE PROTECTED BY FIRE AND SMOKE DAMPERS. ONLY FIRE | | DAMPERS ARE CURRENTLY SHOWN ON THE PLAN. SHOW | | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-M 607.5.4. | | | | 5. PG M1.02A: LOBBY 204 IS SERVING AS PART OF A FIRE | | RATED EXIT ACCESS CORRIDOR. THE 22X14 SUPPLY DUCT | | PENETRATION AT THIS LOCATION IS REQUIRED TO BE | | PROTECTED BY FIRE AND SMOKE DAMPERS. ONLY A FIRE DAMPER | | IS CURRENTLY SHOWN ON THE PLAN. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH | | FBC-M 607.5.4. | | | | 6. PG M1.02B: GALLERY IS SERVING AS PART OF A FIRE | | RATED EXIT ACCESS CORRIDOR. THE 18X14 AND 14X12 RETURN | | DUCT PENETRATIONS AT THIS LOCATION ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | PROTECTED BY FIRE AND SMOKE DAMPERS. ONLY FIRE DAMPERS | | ARE CURRENTLY SHOWN ON THE PLAN. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH | | FBC-M 607.5.4. | | | | 7. PG M1.02B: LOBBY 204 IS SERVING AS PART OF A FIRE | | RATED EXIT ACCESS CORRIDOR. THE 20X14 SUPPLY DUCT | | PENETRATION AT THIS LOCATION IS REQUIRED TO BE | | PROTECTED BY FIRE AND SMOKE DAMPERS. ONLY A FIRE DAMPER | | IS CURRENTLY SHOWN ON THE PLAN. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH | | FBC-M 607.5.4. | | | | 8. PG M1.02B: VESTIBULE 211 IS SERVING AS PART OF A | | FIRE RATED EXIT ACCESS CORRIDOR. THE 12X12 SUPPLY DUCT | | PENETRATION AT THIS LOCATION IS REQUIRED TO BE | | PROTECTED BY FIRE AND SMOKE DAMPERS. ONLY A FIRE DAMPER | | IS CURRENTLY SHOWN ON THE PLAN. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH | | FBC-M 607.5.4. | | | | 9. PG M1.02B: VESTIBULE 211 IS SERVING AS PART OF A | | FIRE RATED EXIT ACCESS CORRIDOR. THE TWO 8 INCH ROUND | | AND ONE 4 INCH ROUND SUPPLY DUCT PENETRATIONS AT THIS | | LOCATION ARE REQUIRED TO BE PROTECTED BY A FIRE DAMPER | | PER FBC-M 607.5.3 OR A THROUGH-PENETRATION FIRESTOP | | SYSTEM PER FBC-M 607.1.1. THEY ALSO REQUIRE SMOKE | | DAMPERS PER FBC-M 607.5.4. | | | | 10. PG M1.102B: THE 4 INCH ROUND EXHAUST DUCT SERVING | | CUSTODIAL 214 SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH A FIRE DAMPER PER | | FBC-M 607.5.3 OR A THROUGH-PENETRATION FIRESTOP SYSTEM | | PER FBC-M 607.1.1. | | | | 11. PG ME1.01: ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLAN INDICATE THAT | | IT WOULD BE NECESSARY TO CLIMB A HEIGHT OF AT LEAST 4 | | FEET (OVER A PARAPET) TO GET FROM THE LOWER ROOF WHERE | | THE ROOF ACCESS HATCH IS LOCATED TO THE MAIN ROOF WHERE | | THE MECHANICAL APPLIANCES ARE LOCATED. SUCH ACCESS | | SHALL NOT REQUIRE CLIMBING OVER OBSTRUCTIONS GREATER | | THAN 30 INCHES HIGH PER FBC-M 306.5. PROVIDE A | | PERMANENT MEANS OF ACCESS OVER THIS OBSTRUCTION. | | | | 12. PG ME1.01: CU-6 AND EF-2 ARE BOTH SHOWN LESS THAN | | 10 FEET FROM THE ROOF EDGE. THE ROOF HATCH OPENING IS | | ALSO LESS THAN 10 FEET FROM THE ROOF EDGE. GUARDS SHALL | | BE PROVIDED AT THESE LOCATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC-M | | 304.10. | | | | 13. PG M2.02: PROVIDE WIND RESISTANT INSTALLATION | | DETAIL FOR ROOF MOUNTED EXHAUST FAN(S) PER FBC-M | | 301.12. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | 561.805.6719 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2011-04-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lwagner |
Date |
2011-04-07 |
Time |
11:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lwagner |
Date |
2011-04-07 |
Time |
10:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2011-02-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lwagner |
Date |
2011-02-28 |
Time |
11:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lwagner |
Date |
2011-02-28 |
Time |
10:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-02-28 10:55:50 | FBC PLUMBING 2007 REVIEW #2 | | DENIED: | | | | 1. A UNISEX RESTROOM WILL BE REQUIRED: | | 403.7 UNISEX TOILET AND BATHING ROOMS. IN ASSEMBLY AND | | MERCANTILE OCCUPANCIES, AN ACCESSIBLE UNISEX TOILET | | ROOM SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE AN AGGREGATE OF SIX OR | | MORE MALE AND FEMALE WATER CLOSETS IS REQUIRED. IN | | BUILDINGS OF MIXED OCCUPANCY, ONLY THOSE WATER CLOSETS | | REQUIRED FOR THE ASSEMBLY OR MERCANTILE OCCUPANCY SHALL | | BE USED TO DETERMINE THE UNISEX TOILET ROOM | | REQUIREMENT. IN RECREATIONAL FACILITIES WHERE | | SEPARATE-SEX BATHING ROOMS ARE PROVIDED, AN ACCESSIBLE | | UNISEX BATHING ROOM SHALL BE PROVIDED. FIXTURES LOCATED | | WITHIN UNISEX TOILET AND BATHING ROOMS SHALL BE | | INCLUDED IN DETERMINING THE NUMBER OF FIXTURES PROVIDED | | IN AN OCCUPANCY. | | | | 2. SHEET 2-1 DOES NOT PROVIDE ENOUGH INFORMATION AS TO | | A POINT OF USE GREASE TRAP FOR THE 3 COMPARTMENT SINK | | ONLY BEING CONNECTED. THE OTHER TWO SINKS AND MOP SINK | | WITH FLOOR DRAIN MAY NEED TO BE CONNECTED ALSO | | DEPENDING UPON THE USE OF THE FOOD PREP AREA. | | 1003.3.1 GREASE INTERCEPTORS AND AUTOMATIC GREASE | | REMOVAL DEVICES REQUIRED. A GREASE INTERCEPTOR OR | | AUTOMATIC GREASE REMOVAL DEVICE SHALL BE REQUIRED TO | | RECEIVE THE DRAINAGE FROM FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT WITH | | GREASE-LADEN WASTE LOCATED IN FOOD PREPARATION AREAS, | | SUCH AS IN RESTAURANTS, HOTEL KITCHENS, HOSPITALS, | | SCHOOL KITCHENS, BARS, FACTORY CAFETERIAS AND CLUBS. | | FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT SHALL INCLUDE POT SINKS, | | PRERINSE SINKS; SOUP KETTLES OR SIMILAR DEVICES; WOK | | STATIONS; FLOOR DRAINS OR SINKS INTO WHICH KETTLES ARE | | DRAINED; AUTOMATIC HOOD WASH UNITS AND DISHWASHERS | | WITHOUT PRERINSE SINKS. GREASE INTERCEPTORS AND | | AUTOMATIC GREASE REMOVAL DEVICES SHALL RECEIVE WASTE | | ONLY FROM FIXTURES AND EQUIPMENT THAT ALLOW FATS, OILS | | OR GREASE TO BE DISCHARGED. | | | | REVIEW BY LARRY WAGNER | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | (561) 805-6692 | | FAX (561) 653-2692 | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-09-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lwagner |
Date |
2010-09-02 |
Time |
12:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lwagner |
Date |
2010-09-01 |
Time |
09:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-09-01 15:07:38 | FBC PLUMBING 2007 | | REVIEW #1 | | DENIED: | | | | 1. SHEET A-2.2 FBC BUILDING 11-4.17.3 (2) THE | | ACCESSIBLE WATER CLOSET SHALL BE LOCATED IN THE CORNER, | | DIAGONAL TO THE DOOR. WOMENS ROOM #213 | | | | 2.SHEET A-2.2 11-4.17.3 2ND FLOOR MENS ROOM #212 ADA | | COMPARTMENT DOES NOT CONFORM WITH FIGURE 30E TOILET | | STALL NEW CONSTRUCTION. | | | | 3. SHEET P 1.01 A - SHOWS ELEVATOR SUMP LINE CONNECTED | | TO THE SITE DRAINAGE. THE ELEVATOR SUMP SHALL NOT | | CONNECT TO THE SITE DRAINAGE DUE TO THE POSSIBILITY OF | | HYDRAULIC FLUID CONTAMINATION. ONE OPTION WOULD BE TO | | ROUTE THE PUMP LINE TO THE SANITARY THROUGH AN OIL | | INTERSEPTOR SIZED TO CONTAIN THE OIL | | FBC PLUMBING 701.4 SEWAGE TREATMENT. SEWAGE OR OTHER | | WASTE FROM A PLUMBING SYSTEM THAT IS DELETERIOUS TO | | SURFACE OR SUBSURFACE WATERS SHALL NOT BE DISCHARGED | | INTO THE GROUND OR INTO ANY WATERWAY UNLESS IT HAS | | FIRST BEEN RENDERED INNOCUOUS THROUGH SUBJECTION TO AN | | APPROVED FORM OF TREATMENT | | FBC BUILDING 3004.4 PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL SYSTEMS. | | PLUMBING AND MECHANICAL SYSTEMS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED IN | | AN ELEVATOR SHAFT. | | EXCEPTION: FLOOR DRAINS, SUMPS AND SUMP PUMPS SHALL BE | | PERMITTED AT THE BASE OF THE SHAFT PROVIDED THEY ARE | | INDIRECTLY CONNECTED TO THE PLUMBING SYSTEM. | | 701.5 DAMAGE TO DRAINAGE SYSTEM OR PUBLIC SEWER. WASTES | | DETRIMENTAL TO THE PUBLIC SEWER SYSTEM OR TO THE | | FUNCTIONING OF THE SEWAGE-TREATMENT PLANT SHALL BE | | TREATED AND DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1003 | | AS DIRECTED BY THE CODE OFFICIAL. | | | | 4. SHEET P 1.01B PLUMBING 314.2.2 CONDENSATE DRAIN PIPE | | MATERIALS AND SIZES. WHERE THE DRAIN PIPES FROM MORE | | THAN ONE UNIT ARE MANIFOLDED TOGETHER FOR CONDENSATE | | DRAINAGE, THE PIPE OR TUBING SHALL BE SIZED IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED METHOD. 3/4" PIPE APPEARS | | TO BE TOO SMALL FOR 7 TONS OF CONDENSATE. | | A 3.0 ROOF DETAIL | | | | 5. SHEET P 1.02 B & P 2.01 THE CIRCUIT VENT FOR THE | | RESTROOMS REQUIRES A DRY VENT BETWEEN THE LAST TWO MOST | | UPSTREAM WC'S PLUMBING 911.2 VENT CONNECTION. THE | | CIRCUIT VENT CONNECTION SHALL BE LOCATED BETWEEN THE | | TWO MOST UPSTREAM FIXTURE DRAINS. THE VENT SHALL | | CONNECT TO THE HORIZONTAL BRANCH AND SHALL BE INSTALLED | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 905. THE CIRCUIT VENT PIPE | | SHALL NOT RECEIVE THE DISCHARGE OF ANY SOIL OR WASTE. | | | | 6. SHEET P 2.01 4" SANITARY PIPE IS REQUIRED UP TO THE | | LAST 4 WATER CLOSETS. TABLE 710.1(2) | | | | 7. IRRIGATION PLAN - IF IRRIGATION IS CONNECTING TO THE | | DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE DOWNSTREAM OF THE RPZ BACKFLOW | | PREVENTOR, THE IRRIGATION LINE WILL REQUIRE A PRESSURE | | VACUUM BREAKER OR AN RPZ BACKFLOW PREVENTOR 608.16.5 | | | | ****NOTE***** FROM SHEET P1.01A - A SEPERATE | | APPLICATION, DRAWINGS, AND GAS PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED | | FOR THE RELOCATED GENERATOR. | | | | REVIEW BY LARRY WAGNER | | CHIEF PLUMBING INSPECTOR | | (561) 805-6692 | | FAX (561) 653-2692 | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
SIGNATURE |
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE SHEET |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2011-08-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2011-08-30 |
Time |
11:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2011-08-30 |
Time |
11:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2011-04-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2011-04-14 |
Time |
08:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2011-04-14 |
Time |
08:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-04-14 08:51:49 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW | | ___________________________________________ | | | | DATE OF REVIEW: 04.14.2011 | | PERMIT NO.: 10080396 | | ADDRESS: 1590 NORTH FLORIDA MANGO ROAD | | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: | | TELEPHONE NO.: | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: NEW OFFICE BUILDING. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | REVIEW STATUS: PASSED WITH PROVISOS | | ___________________________________________ | | | | THIS PERMIT HAS BEEN PASSED, SUBJECT OT THE FOLLOWING | | PROVISOS: | | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, | | THE TEN (10) FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT RUNNING ALONG THE | | NORTH AND EAST PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE ABANDONED. | | PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE RECORDED EASEMENT | | ABANDONMENT. CONTACT VINCE NOEL, CITY SURVEYOR, AT | | 494-1096 FOR INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THIS. | | | | 2. PER SECTION 94-481(C) OF THE CITY'S ZONING AND LAND | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF | | OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED FOR THE NEW BUILDING UNTIL | | THE OLD BUILDING HAS BEEN DEMOLISHED AND REMAINING SITE | | IMPROVEMENTS (I.E. PARKING, LANDSCAPING, ETC.) HAVE | | BEEN INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLANS. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366 | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | PHONE: 561.822.1435 | | FAX: 561.822.1460 | | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2011-04-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2011-04-07 |
Time |
11:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2011-04-07 |
Time |
11:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-04-07 11:56:54 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW | | ___________________________________________ | | | | DATE OF REVIEW: 04.07.2011 | | PERMIT NO.: 10080396 | | ADDRESS: 1590 NORTH FLORIDA MANGO ROAD | | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: | | TELEPHONE NO.: | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: NEW OFFICE BUILDING. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | REVIEW STATUS: FAILED | | ___________________________________________ | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN | | REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | 1. ON SHEET 4 OF 13 OF THE CIVIL DRAWINGS, THE DIAGONAL | | STRIPING FOR THE HANDICAP ACCESS AISLE SHOULD BE 4 INCH | | WHITE STRIPES, NOT BLUE. SEE PARKING STRIPING DETAIL. | | | | 2. THE PARKING DETAIL ON SHEET 6 OF 13 MAY NEED TO BE | | ADJUSTED TO SHOW WHITE STRIPES IN THE HANDICAP ACCESS | | AISLE...IT IS LABELED AS SUCH, BUT BECAUSE IT IS SHADED | | A DARK COLOR, IT MAY BE CONFUSING. | | | | 3. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT FOR | | THE PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING, THE CITY OF WEST PALM | | BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT - CRIME PREVENTION UNIT SHALL | | REVIEW AND APPROVE ALL CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS TO ENSURE | | THE ADHERENCE TO GENERALLY-ACCEPTED CRIME PREVENTION | | THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES. | | | | 4. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE TEN | | (10) FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT RUNNING ALONG THE NORTH AND | | EAST PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE ABANDONED. PLEASE PROVIDE | | A COPY OF THE RECORDED EASEMENT ABANDONMENT. CONTACT | | VINCE NOEL, CITY SURVEYOR, AT 494-1096 FOR INFORMATION | | PERTAINING TO THIS. | | | | 5. PER SECTION 94-481(C) OF THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF | | OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED FOR THE NEW BUILDING UNTIL | | THE OLD BUILDING HAS BEEN DEMOLISHED AND REMAINING SITE | | IMPROVEMENTS (I.E. PARKING, LANDSCAPING, ETC.) HAVE | | BEEN INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLANS. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366 | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | PHONE: 561.822.1435 | | FAX: 561.822.1460 | | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2011-03-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2011-03-31 |
Time |
16:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2011-03-31 |
Time |
16:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-03-31 16:46:08 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW | | ___________________________________________ | | | | DATE OF REVIEW: 03.31.2011 | | PERMIT NO.: 10080396 | | ADDRESS: 1590 NORTH FLORIDA MANGO ROAD | | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: | | TELEPHONE NO.: | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: NEW OFFICE BUILDING. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | REVIEW STATUS: FAILED | | ___________________________________________ | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN | | REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | 1. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT MATCH REGARDING THE | | DRIVEWAY APPROACH ON WITT STREET, CONNECTING INTO THE | | BUILDING. THE CIVIL DRAWINGS AND SITE PLANS SHOW THE | | APRON (OR TAPER) EXTENDING SIGNIFICANTLY CLOSER TO THE | | BUILDING. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW PLANTING BEING | | PLACED BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND THE SIDEWALK. PLEASE | | ENSURE ALL PLANS ARE CONSISTENT. | | | | 2. ON SHEET 4 OF 13 OF THE CIVIL DRAWINGS, THE DIAGONAL | | STRIPING FOR THE HANDICAP ACCESS AISLE SHOULD BE 4 INCH | | WHITE STRIPES, NOT BLUE. SEE PARKING STRIPING DETAIL. | | | | 3. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT MATCH REGARDING THE | | DRIVEWAY APPROACH ON WORTHINGTON STREET. | | | | 4. THE PARKING DETAIL ON SHEET 6 OF 13 MAY NEED TO BE | | ADJUSTED TO SHOW WHITE STRIPES IN THE HANDICAP ACCESS | | AISLE...IT IS LABELED AS SUCH, BUT BECAUSE IT IS SHADED | | A DARK COLOR, IT MAY BE CONFUSING. | | | | 5. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT MATCH REGARDING THE | | PLACEMENT AND QUANTITY OF MECHANICAL UNITS LOCATED ON | | THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF THE BUILDING. | | | | 6. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT MATCH REGARDING THE | | LOCATION OF THE WATER LINE AND FIRE LINE (AND | | ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT). PLEASE ADJUST AND SCREEN ALL | | EQUIPMENT ACCORDINGLY. | | | | 7. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT FOR | | THE PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING, THE CITY OF WEST PALM | | BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT - CRIME PREVENTION UNIT SHALL | | REVIEW AND APPROVE ALL CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS TO ENSURE | | THE ADHERENCE TO GENERALLY-ACCEPTED CRIME PREVENTION | | THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES. | | | | 8. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE TEN | | (10) FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT RUNNING ALONG THE NORTH AND | | EAST PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE ABANDONED. PLEASE PROVIDE | | A COPY OF THE RECORDED EASEMENT ABANDONMENT. CONTACT | | VINCE NOEL, CITY SURVEYOR, AT 494-1096 FOR INFORMATION | | PERTAINING TO THIS. | | | | 9. PER SECTION 94-481(C) OF THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF | | OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED FOR THE NEW BUILDING UNTIL | | THE OLD BUILDING HAS BEEN DEMOLISHED AND REMAINING SITE | | IMPROVEMENTS (I.E. PARKING, LANDSCAPING, ETC.) HAVE | | BEEN INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLANS. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366 | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | PHONE: 561.822.1435 | | FAX: 561.822.1460 | | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2011-02-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2011-02-11 |
Time |
16:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2011-02-11 |
Time |
16:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-02-11 16:43:39 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW | | ___________________________________________ | | | | DATE OF REVIEW: 02.11.2011 | | PERMIT NO.: 10080396 | | ADDRESS: 2100 NORTH FLORIDA MANGO ROAD | | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: | | TELEPHONE NO.: | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: NEW OFFICE BUILDING. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | REVIEW STATUS: FAILED | | ___________________________________________ | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN | | REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | 1. ON SHEET 4 OF 13 OF THE CIVIL DRAWINGS, THE DRIVEWAY | | APPROACH ON WITT STREET, CONNECTING INTO THE BUILDING, | | DOES NOT APPEAR CORRECT, AND DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE OR | | LANDSCAPE PLANS. THE CIVIL DRAWINGS SHOW THE APRON (OR | | TAPER) EXTENDING SIGNIFICANTLY CLOSER TO THE BUILDING. | | THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW PLANTING BEING PLACED BETWEEN | | THE BUILDING AND THE SIDEWALK. PLEASE CLARIFY IF THIS | | SIGNIFICANT OF AN APRON IS NECESSARY. | | | | 2. ON SHEET 5 OF 13 OF THE CIVIL DRAWINGS, THE DRIVEWAY | | APPROACH ON WORTHINGTON STREET DOES NOT MATCH THE SITE | | OR LANDSCAPE PLANS. THE SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANS INDICATE | | ???EXISTING CURB CUT TO REMAIN???. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | 3. ON SHEET 6 OF 13 OF THE CIVIL DRAWINGS, THE PARKING | | DETAIL SHOULD REFLECT TWO (2) FEET TO THE BACK OF THE | | WHEEL STOP, NOT THE FRONT OF THE WHEEL STOP. PLEASE | | ADJUST ACCORDINGLY. | | | | 4. ON SHEET 10 OF 13 OF THE CIVIL DRAWING, THE LOCATION | | OF THE WATER LINE AND FIRE LINE DOES NOT MATCH THAT | | SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY. | | | | 5. ON SHEET SP-1, THE PROPOSED FREESTANDING SIGN IS | | LOCATED WITHIN THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE. PLEASE ADJUST | | ACCORDINGLY. | | | | 6. ON SHEET SP-1, PLEASE NOTE THE PROPOSED CMU TO BE | | PROVIDED AROUND THE A/C UNITS ALONG WORTHINGTON ROAD. | | | | 7. ON SHEET SP-2, PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE | | PROPOSED CMU WALL THAT IS TO SURROUND THE A/C UNITS | | ALONG WORTHINGTON ROAD. ADDITIONALLY, PROVIDE A DETAIL | | OF THE CMU WALL THAT IS PROPOSED TO SURROUND THE | | GENERATOR. | | | | 8. ON SHEET M2.1, THE QUANTITY AND CONFIGURATION OF THE | | CONDENSING UNITS DOES NOT MATCH THAT SHOWN ON THE | | SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANS. PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY. | | | | 9. ON SHEET E1.2, THE LOCATION OF THE LIGHT POLES IN | | THE PARKING LOT DOES NOT MATCH THAT SHOWN ON THE | | SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANS. PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY. | | | | 10. A SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | | 11. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF ANY BUILDING PERMIT FOR | | THE PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING, THE CITY OF WEST PALM | | BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT ??? CRIME PREVENTION UNIT SHALL | | REVIEW AND APPROVE ALL CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS TO ENSURE | | THE ADHERENCE TO GENERALLY-ACCEPTED CRIME PREVENTION | | THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES. | | | | 12. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, THE TEN | | (10) FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT RUNNING ALONG THE NORTH AND | | EAST PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE ABANDONED. | | 13. PER SECTION 94-481(C) OF THE CITY???S ZONING AND | | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF | | OCCUPANCY WILL NOT BE ISSUED FOR THE NEW BUILDING UNTIL | | THE OLD BUILDING HAS BEEN DEMOLISHED AND REMAINING SITE | | IMPROVEMENTS (I.E. PARKING, LANDSCAPING, ETC.) HAVE | | BEEN INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLANS. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. | | ___________________________________________ | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366 | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | PHONE: 561.822.1435 | | FAX: 561.822.1460 | | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-09-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2010-09-01 |
Time |
10:47 |
Rev Time |
|
Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2010-09-01 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-09-01 10:47:27 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW | | | | PERMIT NO.: 10080396 | | ADDRESS: 2100 NORTH FLORIDA MANGO ROAD | | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: | | TELEPHONE NO.: | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: ADDITION OF A SECOND STORY TO AN | | EXISTING ONE STORY OFFICE BUILDING, PARKING AND | | LANDSCAPE MODIFICATIONS. | | | | REVIEW STATUS: FAILED | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN | | REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | 1) AS PROVIDED IN THE APPROVAL LETTER FOR INFORMAL SITE | | PLAN REVIEW CASE NO. 10-01, PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF | | ANY BUILDING PERMIT, THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH POLICE | | DEPARTMENT ??? CRIME PREVENTION UNIT SHALL REVIEW AND | | APPROVE ALL CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS TO ENSURE THE | | ADHERENCE TO GENERALLY-ACCEPTED CRIME PREVENTION | | THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES. PLEASE PROVIDE | | A LETTER OF APPROVAL FROM OFFICER KELLY CARSILLO | | INDICATING SUCH. | | | | 2) ON SHEET 2 OF 9 OF THE PAVING & DRAINAGE, THE | | DIMENSIONS OF THE NORTHERN HALF OF THE PARKING LOT DO | | NOT MATCH THAT PROVIDED ON THE SITE PLAN (SHEET SP-1), | | AND DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM DIMENSIONS REQUIRED. PLEASE | | ADJUST ACCORDINGLY SO THAT ALL SHEETS ARE CONSISTENT | | AND MEET THE MINIMUM DIMENSION REQUIREMENTS FOR PARKING | | SPACES AND DRIVE AISLES. ADDITIONALLY, IT APPEARS THAT | | THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN FOR THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE | | SOUTH PROPERTY LINE DO NOT MATCH THAT SHOWN ON THE SITE | | PLAN. | | | | 3) AS PROVIDED IN THE APPROVAL LETTER FOR INFORMAL SITE | | PLAN REVIEW CASE NO. 10-01, PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A | | CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, A UTILITY EASEMENT SHALL BE | | RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR | | THE PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT ALONG NORTH FLORIDA MANGO | | ROAD. AN APPLICATION FOR SUCH EASEMENT SHALL BE | | SUBMITTED TO THE CITY???S ENGINEERING SERVICES | | DEPARTMENT. | | | | 4) PLEASE UPDATE PARKING STALL DETAIL SHOWN ON SHEET 3 | | OF 9 OF THE PAVING & DRAINAGE TO REFLECT THE CURRENT | | REQUIREMENTS (I.E. LOCATION OF HC SYMBOL, COLORS OF | | STRIPING, ETC.). PLEASE EMAIL ME ([email protected]) TO | | OBTAIN A COPY OF THE CURRENT DETAIL. | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366 | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | PHONE: 561.822.1435 | | FAX: 561.822.1460 | | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM | | |
|
|