Plan Review Stops For Permit 10070135 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2011-03-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2011-03-14 |
Time |
14:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2011-03-14 |
Time |
14:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-03-14 14:51:03 | NEW A-3 SHEET BUILDING DID NOT STAMP SHEET DEPENDING ON | | ENGINEERING AND ZONING REVIEW. | | ZONING ALSO STILL HAS ONE SET OF PLANS. JW |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2011-01-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2011-01-13 |
Time |
13:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2011-01-13 |
Time |
13:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-01-13 13:15:44 | 01/12/2011 @ 9;00 AM, MEETING HELD WITH OWNER, | | CONTRACTOR, ARCHITECT AND MYSELF DISCUSSED | | ACCESSIBILITY ISSUES, WILL APPEAR TO BE CODE COMPLIANT. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-11-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2010-11-01 |
Time |
10:26 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2010-11-01 |
Time |
10:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-11-01 10:44:28 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 10070135 | | ADD: 425 25TH ST | | CONT: CRL CONSTRUCTION | | TEL: (561)248-7177 | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2007 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2009 FBC SUPPLEMENTS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | 2007 EXISTING BUILDING CODE LEVEL II 701.3 | | COMPLIANCE. ALL NEW CONSTRUCTION ELEMENTS, COMPONENTS, | | SYSTEMS, AND SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS | | OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. | | | | 2NDREVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | 1) THE FIRST REVIEW BUILDING PROVIDED A PASSED WITH | | PROVISO WHICH DELT WITH THE INCREASING THE | | RESTROOM DOORS TO ACCESSIBLE 2'-8" CLEAR DOORWAYS. THE | | PLANS WHEN SUBMITTED ON SECOND REVIEW STILL INDICATE | | THE 2'-6" DOORWAYS. | | | | I HAVVE SPOKEN TO THE DESSIGNER OF RECORD ONCE ON THE | | MATTERWHICH ENDED UP NEEDING TO TALK WITH THE BUILDING | | OFFICIAL DOUG WISE FOR HIS INTERPRETATION ON THE | | ACCESSIBILITY ISSUES. | | | | THE CONTRACTOR AND OR DESIGNER WILL NEED TO PROVIDE | | WHERE THEY HAVE WILL MAKE 20% DISPROPOTIONATE COST OR | | $28,000.00 OVER THE CONTRACT VALUE WILL BE ADDED TO THE | | PROJECT BRINGING THE BUILDING THROUGH A SRIES OF | | RENOVATIONS UP TO THE ACCESSIBILTY CODE. THE MONIES ARE | | TO BE SPENT ON: | | 1) AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCCE | | 2) ACCESSIBLE ROUTE TO ALTERED AREAS | | 3) ACCESSIBLE RESTROOMS | | | | NOTE : IF THE FRONT ENTRY WAS 2'-8" CLEAR THE | | RENOVATION OF THE FRONT ENTRY CAN NOT BE USED IN THE | | 20% DISPROPORTIONATE COST. | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLAN REVIEW | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO COMPLETE OUR ANONYMOUS ON-LINE | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SURVEY AT: | | WWW.SURVEYMONKEY.COM/WESTPALMBEACHCONSTRUCTIONSERVICES | | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES HOME PAGE | | HTTP://WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/CONSTRUCTION/INDEX.PHP | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. | | | | MEMBER OF BOAF: BUILDING OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION OF | | FLORIDA SAVING LIVES AND PROPERTY SINCE 1953 | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-07-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2010-07-14 |
Time |
13:39 |
Rev Time |
0.88 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2010-07-14 |
Time |
13:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-07-14 13:41:20 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 10070135 | | ADD: 425 25TH ST | | CONT: CRL CONSTRUCTION INC | | TEL: (561)248-7177 | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2007 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2009 FBC SUPPLEMENTS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | BUILDING APPROVED WITH EXCEPTION! | | THIS PLAN HAS BEEN APPROVED PROVISIONALLY. FAILURE TO | | CORRECT THE LISTED DEFICIENCIES IN THIS PLAN PRIOR TO | | INSPECTION WILL RESULT IN FAILED INSPECTION(S) AND THE | | ASSESSMENT OF RE-INSPECTION FEE(S). REVISIONS REQUIRE | | ADDITIONAL REVIEWS WITH ASSOCIATED FEES. | | | | 1) DOORS 2, 5& 6ARE BEING REPLACED ENACTING 2007 | | EXISTING BUILDING CODE 706.1 A BUILDING, FACILITY OR | | ELEMENT THAT IS ALTERED SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 11 OF | | THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE- BUILDING. | | | | 11-4.13.5 CLEAR WIDTH. DOORWAYS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM | | CLEAR OPENING OF 32 INCHES (813 MM) WITH THE DOOR OPEN | | 90 DEGREES, MEASURED BETWEEN THE FACE OF THE DOOR AND | | THE OPPOSITE STOP [SEE FIGURE 24(A), FIGURE 24(B), | | FIGURE 24(C), AND FIGURE 24(D)]. OPENINGS MORE THAN 24 | | INCHES (610 MM) IN DEPTH SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTIONS | | 11-4.2.1 AND 11-4.3.3 [SEE FIGURE 24(E)]. | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLAN REVIEW | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO COMPLETE OUR ANONYMOUS ON-LINE | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SURVEY AT: | | WWW.SURVEYMONKEY.COM/WESTPALMBEACHCONSTRUCTIONSERVICES | | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES HOME PAGE | | HTTP://WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/CONSTRUCTION/INDEX.PHP |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-12-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rlecky |
Date |
2010-12-27 |
Time |
09:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rlecky |
Date |
2010-12-27 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-08-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2010-08-09 |
Time |
15:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2010-08-09 |
Time |
15:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-08-09 15:18:01 | ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS | | | | | | 1. LIGHTING FIXTURES SPEC' S | | 2.FBC CHAPTER 13 LIGHTING POWER DENSITIES CALC. | | | | | | | | KIM WATKINS 305-506-7423 |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2011-04-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2011-04-18 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.50 |
Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2011-04-18 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-04-18 14:32:00 | PASSED | | | | SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION, PLANS AND FEES ARE | | REQUIRED FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, PARKING, STRIPING, | | ASPHALT. TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO C.O. (CERTIFICATE OF | | OCCUPANCY) | | | | MANUEL JULIAN GONZALEZ | | CSD ENGINEERING REVIEW | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | MOBILE: (561) 644-7301 | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2011-01-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
|
Date |
2011-01-12 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
|
Date |
2011-01-12 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-01-12 08:48:33 | TRASH LOCATION DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT OF THE | | SANITATION DEPT. | | | | PICKUP IS AVAILABLE THRU THE ALLEY AND NOT 25TH ST. | | | | THE TRASH IS PICK-UP TRUCK RUNS FROM WEST TO EAST. | | | | SUGGEST SETTING UP A MEETING WITH SANITATION TO DISCUSS | | DUMPSTER LOCATION. | | | | TRASH ACCESSABILITY MUST ALSO BE INCLUDED IN THE | | AGREEMENT WITH ACCESSIBLE PROPERTY. | | | | PLEASE CONTACT: | | GREGORY RODGERS | | SANITATION SUPERVISOR | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SANITATION | | 1045 CHARLOTTE AVE (COMPLEX) | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | PHONE: 822-2075 EXT: 2077 | | FAX: 822-2084 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | ****************************** | | COMMENTS MADE BY: | | | | MANUEL JULIAN GONZALEZ | | CSD ENGINEERING REVIEW | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | MOBILE: (561) 644-7301 | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-07-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2010-07-29 |
Time |
09:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2010-07-29 |
Time |
09:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-07-29 09:40:48 | 425-25TH STREET | | PERMIT NUMBER 10070135 | | ALTERATIONS AND REPAIR | | | | | | 1. NOTE ON PAGE A-1 REFERENCES "EXISTING HOUSE". PLANS | | ARE FOR A COMMERCIAL BUILDING. | | | | 2. SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE | | RELOCATION OF THE EXISTING FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM. | | KITCHEN FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE UL 300 | | STANDARD FOR KITCHEN FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS. | | | | 3. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK TO COMPLY WITH NFPA 70, THE | | NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE. | | | | 4. TACTILE SIGNAGE REQUIRED AT EXIT DOOR LOCATIONS. | | | | APPROVED | | | | | | MIKE CARSILLO, BATTALION CHIEF | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION |
|
|
Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-07-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lwagner |
Date |
2010-07-27 |
Time |
08:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lwagner |
Date |
2010-07-22 |
Time |
14:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2011-04-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2011-04-22 |
Time |
13:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2011-04-15 |
Time |
19:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-04-15 19:27:32 | RESUBMITTED PLANS AND APPLICATION ROUTED TO LINDA MIA | | FRANCO. EXTERIOR WORK WAS REMOVED FROM SCOPE BY | | CONTRACTOR. |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2011-02-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2011-02-15 |
Time |
08:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2011-02-15 |
Time |
08:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-02-15 08:39:20 | INCOMING SENT TO C-25 BOX. JW |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2010-12-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2010-12-27 |
Time |
12:55 |
Rev Time |
|
Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2010-10-13 |
Time |
08:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2010-08-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2010-08-10 |
Time |
16:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2010-07-08 |
Time |
08:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2011-04-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2011-04-22 |
Time |
13:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2011-04-22 |
Time |
13:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-04-22 13:16:49 | PLEASE SEE LANDSCAPE PERMIT ISSUED UNDER 10100158. JW |
|
|
Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2011-03-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2011-03-03 |
Time |
15:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2011-03-03 |
Time |
15:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2011-03-03 15:10:13 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW OF SITE PLAN FAILED*** | | | | HARDSCAPE SHOWN ON APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT | | CORRESPOND WITH THIS PROPOSED SITE PLAN. THERE ARE | | PLANTING AREAS WITHIN THE BRICK WALKWAY WITH PROPOSED | | PALM GROUPINGS ON THE LANDCAPE PLAN. THE PLANTING AREAS | | ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS SITE PLAN. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT | | KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462. |
|
|
Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2010-10-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2010-10-15 |
Time |
16:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2010-10-15 |
Time |
16:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-10-15 17:00:56 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW NOT REQUIRED*** | | | | PLEASE REFER TO PERMIT #10100158 FOR LANDSCAPE PERMIT | | AND PLANS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-08-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2010-08-06 |
Time |
16:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2010-08-06 |
Time |
16:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-08-06 16:10:07 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*** | | | | PLEASE RESPOND TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | 1. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-441(C)(2) OF THE ZONING AND | | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDR): AS THE VALUE OF | | THE PROPOSED WORK EXCEEDS 50% OF THE STRUCTURE'S VALUE | | (LISTED AS "IMPROVEMENT VALUE" WITH THE P.B.C. PROPERTY | | APPRAISER'S OFFICE), LANDSCAPING SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE | | WITH ALL APPLICABLE REGULATIONS FOUND IN ARTICLE XIV OF | | THE ZLDR. | | | | 2. LANDSCAPING REQUIRES A SEPARATE PERMIT. PLEASE APPLY | | FOR A LANDSCAPE PERMIT AND SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF A | | COMPLETE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH | | SECTIONS 94-442 AND 94-445 OF THE ZONING AND LAND | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. IT SHALL BE SIGNED AND SEALED | | BY A REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. A CERTIFIED COST | | ESTIMATE THAT INCLUDES THE TOTAL COST OF ALL LANDSCAPE | | MATERIALS AND LABOR. IT SHALL BE BROKEN DOWN INTO UNIT | | COST. | | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE THE TABULATION NECESSARY FOR THE | | EVALUATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZONING | | AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, INCLUDING THE | | XERISCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS. | | | | 4. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-448 (D) (2), THE LANDSCAPE | | PLAN SHALL CONTAIN ALL OF THE ITEMS ENUMERATED IN THIS | | SECTION. | | | | 4. AN IRRIGATION PERMIT IS REQUIRED. PLEASE SUBMIT TWO | | (2) COPIES OF AN IRRIGATION PLAN THAT PROVIDES 120% | | COVERAGE TO ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT | | KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462. | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-11-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2010-11-16 |
Time |
10:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2010-11-16 |
Time |
10:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-11-16 10:28:26 | PASS PROVISO | | PLEASE REFER TO SECTION 13-409.AB.3.3 FLA.ENERGY CODE | | 2007 SHUTOFF DAMPER CONTROLS. BOTH OUTDOOR AIR SUPPLY | | AND EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH MOTORIZED | | DAMPERS THAT WILL AUTOMATICALLY SHUT WHEN THE SYSTEMS | | OR SPACE SERVED ARE NOT IN USE. | | PLAN REVIEW BY HAROLD MOSER 561-805-6732 |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-08-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
hmoser |
Date |
2010-08-10 |
Time |
15:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
hmoser |
Date |
2010-08-10 |
Time |
15:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-08-10 16:11:32 | PASS PROVISO | | PAGE M-3 KEY NOTES # 3 AND # 4 DO NOT MATCH AIR | | TERMINAL DEVICE SCHEDULE ON PAGE M-5 .PLEASE PROVIDE A | | LETTER AT THE FIRST ROUGH INSPECTION FROM THE ARCHITECT | | ON WHAT SIZE GRILLS ARE TO BE INSTALLED BY THE | | CONTRACTOR | | PLAN REVIEW BY HAROLD MOSER 561-805-6732 |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-07-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lwagner |
Date |
2010-07-27 |
Time |
08:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lwagner |
Date |
2010-07-21 |
Time |
14:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-07-22 15:14:22 | ******PROVISO******* | | | | 314.2.1 CONDENSATE DISPOSAL. CONDENSATE FROM ALL | | COOLING COILS AND EVAPORATORS SHALL BE CONVEYED FROM | | THE DRAIN PAN OUTLET TO AN APPROVED PLACE OF DISPOSAL. | | | | 608.15.4 PROTECTION BY A VACUUM BREAKER. OPENINGS AND | | OUTLETS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY ATMOSPHERIC-TYPE OR | | PRESSURE-TYPE VACUUM BREAKERS. THE CRITICAL LEVEL OF | | THE VACUUM BREAKER SHALL BE SET A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES | | (152 MM) ABOVE THE FLOOD LEVEL RIM OF THE FIXTURE OR | | DEVICE. | | | | 905.4 VERTICAL RISE OF VENT. EVERY DRY VENT SHALL RISE | | VERTICALLY TO A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES (152 MM) ABOVE THE | | FLOOD LEVEL RIM OF THE HIGHEST TRAP OR TRAPPED FIXTURE | | BEING VENTED. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2011-04-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lfranco |
Date |
2011-04-20 |
Time |
10:46 |
Rev Time |
4.00 |
Received By |
lfranco |
Date |
2011-04-20 |
Time |
10:46 |
Sent To |
L |
|
Notes |
2011-04-20 10:49:57 | PLANNING AND ZONING: **** PASSED WITH PROVISO: THIS | | PERMIT IS FOR INTERIOR WORK ONLY. SEPARATE PERMITS ARE | | REQUIRED FOR ALL EXTERIOR WORK (FOR EXAMPLE, PARKING | | STRIPPING, DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE) PRIOR TO C.O. OR | | CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION C.O.C. ANY OTHER WORK SUCH AS | | SIGNAGE, MURAL WORK REQUIRES ADDITIONAL PERMITS PRIOR | | TO WORK BEING PERFORMED (WHEN THE APPLICANT IS READY TO | | SUBMIT). LMF |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-11-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lfranco |
Date |
2010-11-10 |
Time |
19:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lfranco |
Date |
2010-11-10 |
Time |
19:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-11-10 20:08:32 | PLANNING AND ZONING: *** FAILED **** | | | | 1. RESPOND TO COMMENTS IN WRITING. THE SUBMITTAL OF THE | | REQUESTED INFORMATION MAY GENERATE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | 2. PROVIDE TWO (2) COPIES OF A CURRENT SURVEY, WHICH | | INCLUDES THE PROPERTY'S ADDRESS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION. | | | | 3. THIS PROPERTY IS WITHIN THE NORTHWOOD MIXED USE | | DISTRICT ("NMUD") BUILDING TYPE I, PURSUANT TO THE | | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ("ZLDR") | | SECTION 94-211(A)(2): STORIES AT THE SIDEWALK LEVEL | | SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 12 FEET IN HEIGHT FROM FINISHED | | FLOOR TO FINISHED CEILING AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 16 FEET | | IN HEIGHT FROM FINISHED FLOOR TO FINISHED FLOOR. | | EXISTING FINISHED CEILINGS MAY BE EXEMPT FROM THE | | HEIGHT PROVISION, PROVIDED ANY RENOVATIONS DO NOT | | REQUIRE THE REMOVAL OF ANY OF THE EXTERIOR WALLS, | | CEILINGS OR ROOF. MEZZANINES THAT EXCEED THE | | PERMISSIBLE PERCENTAGE OF FLOOR AREA FOR A MEZZANINE AS | | DEFINED IN THE CITY'S BUILDING CODE SHALL BE COUNTED AS | | A STORY. | | | | PROVIDE THE CEILING HEIGHT FOR ALL AREAS. | | | | 4. PURSUANT TO THE ZLDR, SECTION 94-213(D)(5): | | STOREFRONTS ARE REQUIRED ON THE FRONTAGE LINES AND | | SHALL BE DIRECTLY ACCESSIBLE FROM SIDEWALKS. | | STOREFRONTS SHALL PROVIDE CLEAR GLAZED AREAS AS | | FOLLOWS: | | | | A. FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, EACH STOREFRONT SHALL HAVE | | CLEAR GLAZED AREAS EQUAL TO A MINIMUM OF 70 PERCENT OF | | ITS FACADE, BETWEEN TWO AND EIGHT FEET FROM THE GROUND | | AND MUST BE EQUALLY DISPERSED THROUGHOUT ALL FRONTAGES. | | B. RENOVATIONS OR ADDITIONS (NOT ON THE FRONTAGE LINE) | | TO EXISTING BUILDINGS SHALL NOT REDUCE THE ORIGINAL | | PERCENTAGE OF CLEAR GLAZED AREAS, IF IT IS MORE THAN 50 | | PERCENT OF ITS FACADE, BETWEEN TWO AND EIGHT FEET FROM | | THE GROUND. | | C RENOVATIONS OR ADDITIONS (NOT ON THE FRONTAGE LINE) | | TO EXISTING BUILDINGS THAT HAVE CLEAR GLAZED AREAS LESS | | THAN 50 PERCENT OF ITS FACADE, BETWEEN TWO AND EIGHT | | FEET FROM THE GROUND, MUST PROVIDE AT LEAST 50 PERCENT | | CLEAR GLAZED OF ITS FACADE, BETWEEN TWO AND EIGHT FEET | | FROM THE GROUND. | | D. ADDITIONS ON THE FRONTAGE LINE SHALL HAVE CLEAR | | GLAZED AREAS EQUAL TO A MINIMUM OF 70 PERCENT OF ITS | | FRONT FACADE, BETWEEN TWO AND EIGHT FEET FROM THE | | GROUND AND MUST BE EQUALLY DISPERSED THROUGHOUT ALL | | FRONTAGES. | | | | PROVIDE ELEVATION OF ALL EXISTING STOREFRONTS WITH THE | | MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS SHOWING GLAZING | | COMPLIANCE. PROVIDE THESE REQUIREMENTS ON A DATA MATRIX | | OF WHAT IS REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR GLAZING. INCLUDE | | SQUARE FOOTAGE OF FACADE, ETC. ALSO THE STOREFRONT | | SHALL MEET A MINIMUM OF 70 PERCENT OF GLAZING | | REQUIREMENTS AND SHALL BE DISPERSED THROUGHOUT THE | | FACADE. | | | | RE-SUBMITTAL: THE PROPOSED PERCENTAGE IS UNDER REVIEW, | | WILL AMEND COMMENTS UPON COMPLETION OF REVIEW. THE | | WINDOW ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE ELEVATION DOES NOT GO TO | | THE FULL LEVEL BETWEEN THE 2' FEET AND 8' FEET AREA, | | WASN'T THIS WINDOW GOING TO BE REVISED TO ADD THE | | ADDITIONAL GLAZING REQUIRED? | | | | 5. THE PROPOSED PARKING IS BACKING INTO ADJACENT | | PROPERTY, WHICH IS NOT ALLOWED PER ZLDR, SECTION | | 94-485(N). IS THERE AN EXISTING RECORDED ACCESS | | AGREEMENT WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER? | | | | RE-SUBMITTAL: A RECORDED ACCESS AGREEMENT IS REQUIRED, | | PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING | | DEPARTMENT. | | | | 6. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-212(16): MECHANICAL SYSTEMS | | SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW BY LANDSCAPING OR BUILT | | ELEMENTS DESIGNED AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE BUILDING | | ARCHITECTURE. PROVIDE ELEVATION SHOWING THE MECHANICAL | | LINE WITHIN PARAPET OR SIMILAR STRUCTURE, IF | | APPLICABLE. | | | | RE-SUBMITTAL: MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS STILL SHOWING. | | WHERE IS THE EXISTING MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT NOW? IS IT | | IN THE SAME VICINITY? | | | | 7. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-212(17) : DUMPSTERS AND | | STORAGE AREAS SHALL BE ENCLOSED IN THE BUILDING OR | | SHIELDED FROM VIEW BY BUILT ENCLOSURES CONSISTENT WITH | | THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE BUILDING. A SEPARATE PERMIT FOR | | PARKING PAVING AND STRIPPING WITH DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE | | WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | | RE-SUBMITTAL: THE BUILDING IS BLOCK CONCRETE AND THE | | DUMPSTER IS MADE OUT OF WOOD WHICH IS NOT CONSISTENT | | WITH THE PROVISIONS ABOVE. REVISE ACCORDINGLY. | | A SEPARATE PERMIT FOR PAVING AND STRIPPING WITH | | DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE WILL BE REQUIRED. | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT ME. | | | | LINDA MIA FRANCO | | SENIOR PLANNER | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | TEL: (561) 822-1443 | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-08-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lfranco |
Date |
2010-08-05 |
Time |
20:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lfranco |
Date |
2010-08-05 |
Time |
20:36 |
Sent To |
L |
|
Notes |
2010-08-05 20:44:43 | PLANNING AND ZONING: *** FAILED **** | | | | 1. RESPOND TO COMMENTS IN WRITING. THE SUBMITTAL OF THE | | REQUESTED INFORMATION MAY GENERATE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | 2. PROVIDE TWO (2) COPIES OF A CURRENT SURVEY, WHICH | | INCLUDES THE PROPERTY'S ADDRESS AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION. | | | | 3. THIS PROPERTY IS WITHIN THE NORTHWOOD MIXED USE | | DISTRICT ("NMUD") BUILDING TYPE I, PURSUANT TO THE | | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ("ZLDR") | | SECTION 94-211(A)(2): STORIES AT THE SIDEWALK LEVEL | | SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 12 FEET IN HEIGHT FROM FINISHED | | FLOOR TO FINISHED CEILING AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 16 FEET | | IN HEIGHT FROM FINISHED FLOOR TO FINISHED FLOOR. | | EXISTING FINISHED CEILINGS MAY BE EXEMPT FROM THE | | HEIGHT PROVISION, PROVIDED ANY RENOVATIONS DO NOT | | REQUIRE THE REMOVAL OF ANY OF THE EXTERIOR WALLS, | | CEILINGS OR ROOF. MEZZANINES THAT EXCEED THE | | PERMISSIBLE PERCENTAGE OF FLOOR AREA FOR A MEZZANINE AS | | DEFINED IN THE CITY'S BUILDING CODE SHALL BE COUNTED AS | | A STORY. | | | | PROVIDE THE CEILING HEIGHT FOR ALL AREAS. | | | | 4. PURSUANT TO THE ZLDR, SECTION 94-213(D)(5): | | STOREFRONTS ARE REQUIRED ON THE FRONTAGE LINES AND | | SHALL BE DIRECTLY ACCESSIBLE FROM SIDEWALKS. | | STOREFRONTS SHALL PROVIDE CLEAR GLAZED AREAS AS | | FOLLOWS: | | | | A. FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION, EACH STOREFRONT SHALL HAVE | | CLEAR GLAZED AREAS EQUAL TO A MINIMUM OF 70 PERCENT OF | | ITS FACADE, BETWEEN TWO AND EIGHT FEET FROM THE GROUND | | AND MUST BE EQUALLY DISPERSED THROUGHOUT ALL FRONTAGES. | | B. RENOVATIONS OR ADDITIONS (NOT ON THE FRONTAGE LINE) | | TO EXISTING BUILDINGS SHALL NOT REDUCE THE ORIGINAL | | PERCENTAGE OF CLEAR GLAZED AREAS, IF IT IS MORE THAN 50 | | PERCENT OF ITS FACADE, BETWEEN TWO AND EIGHT FEET FROM | | THE GROUND. | | C RENOVATIONS OR ADDITIONS (NOT ON THE FRONTAGE LINE) | | TO EXISTING BUILDINGS THAT HAVE CLEAR GLAZED AREAS LESS | | THAN 50 PERCENT OF ITS FACADE, BETWEEN TWO AND EIGHT | | FEET FROM THE GROUND, MUST PROVIDE AT LEAST 50 PERCENT | | CLEAR GLAZED OF ITS FACADE, BETWEEN TWO AND EIGHT FEET | | FROM THE GROUND. | | D. ADDITIONS ON THE FRONTAGE LINE SHALL HAVE CLEAR | | GLAZED AREAS EQUAL TO A MINIMUM OF 70 PERCENT OF ITS | | FRONT FACADE, BETWEEN TWO AND EIGHT FEET FROM THE | | GROUND AND MUST BE EQUALLY DISPERSED THROUGHOUT ALL | | FRONTAGES. | | | | PROVIDE ELEVATION OF ALL EXISTING STOREFRONTS WITH THE | | MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS SHOWING GLAZING | | COMPLIANCE. PROVIDE THESE REQUIREMENTS ON A DATA MATRIX | | OF WHAT IS REQUIRED AND PROVIDED FOR GLAZING. INCLUDE | | SQUARE FOOTAGE OF FACADE, ETC. THE IMPROVEMENTS SHALL | | INCLUDE THE SIDE ELEVATIONS TO THE EAST, AND NO | | REDUCTION OF THE GLAZING WILL BE ALLOWED. | | SHEET A-1 SHOWS OPENING PROPOSED TO BE ENCLOSED, NO | | REDUCTION OF EXISTING GLAZING WILL BE ALLOWED. ALSO THE | | STOREFRONT SHALL MEET A MINIMUM OF 70 PERCENT OF | | GLAZING REQUIREMENTS AND SHALL BE DISPERSED THROUGHOUT | | THE FACADE. THE CURRENT ELEVATION SHOWS THE EAST SIDE | | OF THE FACADE TO BE ENCLOSED (EXISTING FACADE HAD | | GLAZING IN THIS AREA). THE GLAZING IS NOT EQUALLY | | DISPERSED. | | | | 5. THE PROPOSED PARKING IS BACKING INTO ADJACENT | | PROPERTY, WHICH IS NOT ALLOWED PER ZLDR, SECTION | | 94-485(N). IS THERE AN EXISTING RECORDED ACCESS | | AGREEMENT WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER? | | | | 6. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-212(16): MECHANICAL SYSTEMS | | SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW BY LANDSCAPING OR BUILT | | ELEMENTS DESIGNED AS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE BUILDING | | ARCHITECTURE. PROVIDE ELEVATION SHOWING THE MECHANICAL | | LINE WITHIN PARAPET OR SIMILAR STRUCTURE, IF | | APPLICABLE. | | | | 7. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-212(17) : DUMPSTERS AND | | STORAGE AREAS SHALL BE ENCLOSED IN THE BUILDING OR | | SHIELDED FROM VIEW BY BUILT ENCLOSURES CONSISTENT WITH | | THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE BUILDING. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT ME. | | | | LINDA MIA FRANCO | | SENIOR PLANNER | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | TEL: (561) 822-1443 | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | |
|
|