Plan Review Stops For Permit 10030050 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-05-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2010-05-17 |
Time |
15:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2010-05-17 |
Time |
15:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-04-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2010-04-12 |
Time |
16:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2010-04-12 |
Time |
16:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-04-12 16:34:12 | PROVISO | | | | 1) PLANS ARE REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED AND STAMPED BY | | PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR IMPACT FEES. | | | | 2) SUBMIT 2 COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE | | EXTERIOR OUT-SWING ARCHED TOP WOOD DOOR AS REQUIRED BY | | DCA RULE 9B-72. | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | (561)805-6714 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-03-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2010-03-11 |
Time |
12:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2010-03-10 |
Time |
11:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-03-10 14:00:14 | REVISION DENIED | | | | 1) THE ORIGINAL PLANS AND PERMIT WERE ISSUED UNDER THE | | 2004 FBC W/2007 REVISIONS AND ASCE 7-02. THE REVISED | | DRAWINGS SPECIFY THE 2007 FBC AND ASCE 7-05. PLEASE | | CORRECT. | | | | 2) THE REVISED PLANS DO NOT CORRESPOND TO THE ORDER OR | | NUMBERING OF THE APPROVED PLANS. IT APPEARS THAT YOUR | | INTENT IS TO SUBMIT ALL NEW DRAWINGS RATHER THAN SIMPLY | | REVISING THE APPROVED DRAWINGS. IF THIS IS THE CASE | | PLEASE SUBMIT TWO COMPLETE SETS OF ARCHITECTURAL AND | | STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS. NEW MECHANICAL AND PLUMBING | | DRAWINGS WILL ALSO BE REQUIRED. | | | | 3) ON S3, THE MAXIMUM MEAN ROOF HEIGHT ( DISTANCE FROM | | FINISH GRADE TO MID POINT OF THE HIGHEST SLOPED ROOF) | | IS SPECIFIED AS 25' AND THE ACTUAL MEAN ROOF HEIGHT IS | | GREATER. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | 4) ON S3, THE WORST CASE COMPONENT AND CLADDING | | PRESSURE FOR THE TWO STORY STRUCTURE IN EXPOSURE 'C' IS | | SPECIFIED AS -57 PSF. THIS APPEARS TO BE TOO LOW. | | PLEASE SHOW HOW THIS WAS DETERMINED. | | | | 5) THE EDGE PRESSURES ON S3 ARE BOTH SPECIFIED AS | | NEGATIVE. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | 6) THE NEW PLANS INDICATE THAT THE LIVING SPACE HAS | | BEEN INCREASED FROM THE APPROVED PLANS. PLANS WILL NEED | | TO BE REVIEWED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY TO DETERMINE IF | | ADDITIONAL IMPACT FEES ARE DUE. | | | | 7) THE NEW PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF | | RECORD OF THE PROJECT. | | | | 8) PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR SERIES 740 PROJECTED (AWNING) | | WINDOWS WAS SUBMITTED. THERE ARE NOT ANY OF THESE TYPE | | OF WINDOW SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | 9) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE FRENCH DOORS (NO. | | 07-0103.02) ARE EXPIRED. PLEASE SUBMIT CURRENT NOAS. | | | | 10) SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE ARCHED TOP WOOD | | FRONT DOOR (101) AND WOOD DOOR (102). | | | | 11) SPECIFY THE APPROVED ASSEMBLY, FASTENING OPTION AND | | MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE FOR THE TAMKO MODIFIED ROOF | | SYSTEM THAT WILL BE INSTALLED. PROVIDE ENHANCED | | FASTENING CALCULATIONS IF REQUIRED TO MEET ROOF | | UPLIFTS. SEE LIMITATION NUMBER 7 OF THE TAMKO PRODUCT | | APPROVAL. | | | | 12) SUBMIT TWO COPIES OF THE MANUFACTURER'S | | SPECIFICATIONS/ PRODUCT EVALUATION FOR THE SPRAY FOAM | | INSULATION THAT WILL BE INSTALLED. | | | | 13) SUBMIT REVISED ENERGY CALCULATIONS. | | | | 14) PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO PLAN REVIEW | | COMMENTS. | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | (561)805-6714 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-05-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2010-05-11 |
Time |
10:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2010-05-11 |
Time |
10:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-04-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2010-04-09 |
Time |
09:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2010-04-09 |
Time |
09:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-03-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2010-03-08 |
Time |
16:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2010-03-08 |
Time |
12:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-03-08 12:47:46 | | | | | REVISION DENIED/INCOMPLETE INFORMATION | | | | FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | | 1} SHEET E-2 IS MISSING THE RISER DIAGRAM, ELECTRICAL | | NOTES AND LEGEND, PANEL SCHEDULES AND LOAD | | CALCULATIONS. ALSO THE PLUMBING DIAGRAM HAS BEEN | | REMOVED, SUBMIT NEW PLUMBING PLANS TO SHOW THE | | REVISIONS TO THE PLAN.105.1 FBC AS AMENDED. | | | | 2} POOL EQUIPMENT HAS BEEN ADDED, A SEPARATE POOL | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS WORK, THE LOAD CALCULATIONS | | AND PANEL SCHEDULE MUST BE REVISED. 105.1FBC. | | | | 3} THE METER LOCATION HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM SHEET E-1, | | INDICATE LOCATION OF SAME SO THAT COMPLIANCE WITH | | ARTICLES 225 AND 230 CAN BE REVIEWED. | | | | 4} KITCHEN RECEPTACLE SPACING MUST COMPLY WITH | | 210.52(A), 210.52(C), AND 210.8(A)(6) GFI. THE AREA ON | | EITHER SIDE OF THE RANGE DO NOT APPEAR TO COMPLY WITH | | THE 2' SPACING. | | | | 5} THE PANEL INROOM 104 "LAUNDRY, 2ND FLOOR, IS IN | | VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 110.26(A)(2) WIDTH OF WORKING | | SPACE THE WIDTH OF THE WORKING SPACE IN FRONT OF THE | | ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT SHALL BE THE WIDTH OF THE EQUIPMENT | | OR 750 MM (30 IN.), WHICHEVER IS GREATER. IN ALL CASES, | | THE WORK SPACE SHALL PERMIT AT LEAST A 90 DEGREE | | OPENING OF EQUIPMENT DOORS OR HINGED PANELS.SEE SHEET | | A-2 FOR DIMENSION OF THAT SPACE (2'-31/4") | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561/805-6718 | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2010-05-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2010-05-17 |
Time |
15:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2010-05-05 |
Time |
16:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-05-05 16:53:38 | TO R12 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2010-03-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2010-03-11 |
Time |
12:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2010-03-02 |
Time |
12:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-05-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2010-05-27 |
Time |
08:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2010-05-27 |
Time |
08:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
IMPACT |
COUNTY IMPACT FEES |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-04-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2010-04-13 |
Time |
10:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2010-04-13 |
Time |
10:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-04-13 10:28:46 | PALM BEACH COUNTY IMPACT FEE STAMP AND COPY OF PAID | | RECEIPT IS REQUIRED. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-05-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2010-05-17 |
Time |
15:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2010-05-17 |
Time |
15:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-05-17 15:42:43 | STAMPED NEW SHEETS / NEEDS TO SUBMIT REVISED HEATING | | AND COOLING EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS TO COORDINATE | | WITH THE REVISED PLANS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-04-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2010-04-12 |
Time |
16:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2010-04-12 |
Time |
16:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-04-12 16:44:39 | SUBMIT REVISED HEATING AND COOLING EQUIPMENT SIZING | | CALCULATIONS TO COORDINATE WITH THE REVISED PLANS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-05-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2010-05-17 |
Time |
15:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2010-05-17 |
Time |
15:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-04-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2010-04-13 |
Time |
10:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2010-04-13 |
Time |
15:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-05-17 15:50:41 | STAMPED NEW SHEET |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-05-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2010-05-20 |
Time |
15:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2010-05-20 |
Time |
15:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-04-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
2010-04-16 |
Time |
10:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jroach |
Date |
2010-04-16 |
Time |
10:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-04-16 10:47:08 | ZONING PLAN REVIEW | | | | PERMIT NO.: 10030050 | | ADDRESS: 270 BARCELONA ROAD | | CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: TODD | | TELEPHONE NO.: 561.718.1866 | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: NEW ADDITION AND RENOVATIONS TO SINGLE | | FAMILY RESIDENCE AND NEW ADDITION AND RENOVATIONS TO | | ACCESSORY STRUCTURE. | | | | REVIEW STATUS: FAILED | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN | | REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | 1) PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-304(B)(3) OF THE CITY???S | | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS), | | ACCESSORY STRUCTURES SHALL BE LOCATED NO CLOSER THAN | | SIX (6) FEET TO THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE. THE PROPOSED | | ADDITION TO THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE DOES NOT CONFORM TO | | THIS PROVISION. | | | | 2) PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-74(A)(3), SIDE SETBACKS FOR | | THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) | | FEET. THE SECOND FLOOR MASTER BEDROOM ADDITION DOES NOT | | CONFORM TO THIS PROVISION. | | | | 3) PLEASE PROVIDE THE OVERALL HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING, | | AS MEASURED FROM FINISHED GRADE TO THE MEAN POINT OF | | THE PITCHED ROOF. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INDICATE THE | | OVERALL HEIGHT OF THE CHIMNEY. PURSUANT TO THE ZLDRS, | | THE OVERALL MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT IS 30 FEET, AND THE | | CHIMNEY SHALL NOT BE ANY TALLER THAN 33 FEET. | | | | 4) PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-305(B)(4), MECHANICAL | | EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXTEND MORE THAN FOUR (4) FEET INTO | | ANY REQUIRED SETBACK. AS THE EAST PROPERTY LINE HAS THE | | FIVE (5) FOOT SETBACK, THE WEST PROPERTY LINE SHALL | | HAVE A SETBACK OF AT LEAST TEN (10) FEET FOR THE | | PRIMARY STRUCTURE; THEREFORE, THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT | | SHALL BE SET BACK AT LEAST SIX (6) FEET FROM THE WEST | | PROPERTY LINE. | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED | | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366 | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | PHONE: 561.822.1435 | | FAX: 561.822.1460 | | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM | | |
|
|