Plan Review Stops For Permit 09110579 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-01-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2010-01-21 |
Time |
08:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2010-01-21 |
Time |
08:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-01-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2010-01-13 |
Time |
08:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2010-01-13 |
Time |
08:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-01-13 08:09:03 | ** TEMP FAILED BASED ON ZONING COMMENTS. CAN NTO STAMP | | PLANS AT THIS TIME. | | | | 1) NOTE: THERE ARE COMMENT FROM ZONING WHICH NEED TO BE | | ADDRESSED BEFORE PLANS CAN BE STAMPED. THE FIRST THREE | | SHEETS TO EACH SET CONTAINS MEASURMENTS AND SIZING NOT | | CONSISTENT WITHN ONE ANOTHER. ONE SET INDICATES ONE | | SIZE OR ELEVATION AND THE OTHER SET INDICATES A | | DIFFERENT SIZE OR ELEVATION. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-12-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-12-21 |
Time |
09:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-12-21 |
Time |
09:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-01-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2010-01-21 |
Time |
09:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2010-01-21 |
Time |
09:13 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2010-01-21 09:13:37 | PROCESSED AND STAMPED ALL SHEETS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-01-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2010-01-13 |
Time |
08:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2010-01-13 |
Time |
08:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-01-13 08:08:03 | ** TEMP FAILED. | | | | 1) NOTE: ELECTRICAL REVIEW IS OK AND VALUE HAS BEEN | | INCREASED FOR PROJECT. FEE BALANCE DUE BEFORE ISSUANCE. | | | | 2) NOTE: THE INCORRECT NEC IS STATED ON PLANS. PLANS | | SHOW 2005 WHEN THESE SHOULD BE 2008. ALL PERMIT | | APPLICATIONS AFTER OCT 1ST, 2009 ARE UNDER THE 2008 | | NEC. THIS CAN BE REDLINED AND STAMPED ON SHEETS WHICH | | ARE NOT BE CORRECTED FOR OTHER COMMENTS. | | | | 3) NOTE: THERE ARE COMMENT FROM ZONING WHICH NEED TO BE | | ADDRESSED BEFORE PLANS CAN BE STAMPED. THE FIRST THREE | | SHEETS TO EACH SET CONTAINS MEASURMENTS AND SIZING NOT | | CONSISTENT WITHN ONE ANOTHER. ONE SET INDICATES ONE | | SIZE OR ELEVATION AND THE OTHER SET INDICATES A | | DIFFERENT SIZE OR ELEVATION. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-12-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-12-09 |
Time |
09:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-12-09 |
Time |
09:48 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2009-12-09 09:49:01 | | | ** DENIED ** | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE COPY OF CONTRACT FOR ALL NEW | | SIGNS. THE VALUE FOR THE LED SIGNS SUBMITTED IS LOW. | | FBC 108.3 REQUIRES THE VALUE TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, | | EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS, DESIGN COST ETC EVEN IF ANY OF | | THESE ITEMS ARE OWNER SUPPLIED. | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SUPPLY SPECIFICATION CUT SHEETS FOR THE | | LED DRIVERS. | | PLEASE BE SURE LISTING BY A NRTL IS LISTED ON THE | | SHEETS. | | NEC 110.3 | | | | 3) NOTE: CITY PLACE MANAGMENT STAMP IS REQUIRED ON ALL | | PLANS. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2010-01-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
2010-01-13 |
Time |
11:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2010-01-13 |
Time |
11:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-01-20 11:12:41 | *********************EXPEDITED********************* | | 2ND RUN | | SENT TO ZONING ON 1/20/10 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2010-01-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2010-01-04 |
Time |
13:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2010-01-04 |
Time |
13:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2010-01-12 15:57:21 | TO DP DESK 1/12/10 | | | 2010-01-04 13:23:10 | TO ZONING | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-12-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-12-21 |
Time |
09:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-11-30 |
Time |
14:24 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2010-01-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2010-01-20 |
Time |
16:06 |
Rev Time |
0.33 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2010-01-20 |
Time |
16:06 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2010-01-20 16:15:40 | CITYPLACE STAMP ON ONE SET OF PLANS. THIS IS SUFFICIENT | | TO ADDRESS ZONING COMMENT. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2010-01-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2010-01-12 |
Time |
13:40 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2010-01-12 |
Time |
10:44 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2010-01-12 13:41:20 | FAILED | | | | 1) ONLY ONE COMPLETE SET OF REVISED PLANS WAS SUBMITTED | | WITH THE PERMIT RESUBMITTAL - THE TWO SETS OF PLANS | | HAVE DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT FOR THE CANOPY | | BROWS. | | | | 2) ONE SET OF PLANS (THE SET WITH ALL PAGES HAVING THE | | CITYPLACE MANAGEMENT STAMP) SHOWS A DIFFERENT HEIGHT | | DIMENSION FOR THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING | | BETWEEN SHEETS 1 AND 2 (27 FEET VS. 28 FEET). | | | | 3) REPEAT COMMENT: NOT ALL PLANS HAVE THE CITYPLACE | | MANAGEMENT STAMP. | | | | 4) REPEAT COMMENT: THE CITYPLACE MASTER SIGN PLAN | | REQUIRES SIGN TEXT TO BE A MINIMUM OF 8 INCHES IN | | HEIGHT. THE HEIGHT OF THE SMALLEST LETTER ON THE MENU | | BOARD APPEARS TO BE LESS THAN 2 INCHES IN HEIGHT. A | | VARIANCE APPROVING THE HEIGHT OF THE MENU BOARD LETTERS | | IS REQUIRED. | | | | A COPY OF THESE COMMENTS HAS BEEN SENT TO CARLOS BERNAL | | AT CITYPLACE. | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-12-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-12-21 |
Time |
09:52 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2009-12-07 |
Time |
18:41 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2009-12-07 19:20:44 | FAILED | | | | 1) THE CITYPLACE MANAGEMENT STAMP IS REQUIRED ON THE | | PLANS. | | | | 2) THE PCN LISTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IS INCORRECT. | | | | 3) THIS IS NOT A DESIGNATED SIGN LOCATION IN THE | | CITYPLACE MASTER SIGN PLAN. | | | | 4) THE CITYPLACE MASTER SIGN PLAN PROHIBITS INTERNALLY | | ILLUMINATED BOX SIGNS. | | | | 5) THE CITYPLACE MASTER SIGN PLAN REQUIRES SIGN TEXT TO | | BE A MAXIMUM OF 12 INCHES IN HEIGHT. THE HEIGHT FOR THE | | LARGEST LETTERS WAS NOT PROVIDED ON THE PLANS (M AND S) | | | | 6) THE CITYPLACE MASTER SIGN PLAN REQUIRES SIGN TEXT TO | | BE A MINIMUM OF 8 INCHES IN HEIGHT. THE HEIGHT OF THE | | SMALLEST LETTER WAS NOT PROVIDED ON THE PLANS (FRESH | | SEAFOOD ON MAIN SIGN & SMALLEST LETTERS ON THE MENU | | BOARD). | | | | 7) THE CITYPLACE MASTER SIGN PLAN LIMITS THE SIZE OF | | THE BLADE SIGN PANEL TO 18 INCHES X 18 INCHES. THE | | BLADE SIGN EXCEEDS THIS DIMENSION (22 INCHES X 36 | | INCHES). | | | | 8) THE CITYPLACE MASTER SIGN PLAN DOES NOT ALLOW | | INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED BLADE SIGNS. | | | | 9) THE CITYPLACE MASTER SIGN PLAN REQUIRES WRITTEN | | CONSENT FOR ACRYLIC MATERIAL. | | | | 10) THE CITYPLACE MASTER SIGN PLAN DOES NOT ALLOW | | EXPOSED RACEWAYS. SHEETS 3 AND 4 CALL OUT A RACEWAY ON | | THE FRONT SIGN. | | | | 11) THE CITYPLACE MASTER SIGN PLAN ALLOWS VARIANCES | | FROM THE PROVISIONS OF 3 THROUGH 9. PROVIDE A NOTARIZED | | LETTER FROM CITYPLACE THAT THEY HAVE GRANTED THE | | SPECIFIC VARIANCES NEEDED TO CONSTRUCT THE PROPOSED | | SIGN. | | | | A COPY OF THESE COMMENTS HAS BEEN SENT TO CARLOS BERNAL | | AT CITYPLACE. | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446. | | |
|
|