Plan Review Details - Permit 09080455
Plan Review Stops For Permit 09080455
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2009-09-01 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2009-09-01 Time 16:15 Rev Time 0.77
Received By jwitmer Date 2009-09-01 Time 15:31 Sent To  
Notes
2009-09-01 16:48:43BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 PERMIT: 09080455
 ADD: 312 S ROSEMARY AVE
 CONT: PLAN REVIEW
 TEL: (561)856-6655
  
 FL BLD CODE= 2007 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 W/ 2009 FBC SUPPLEMENTS
 * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS
  
 1ST REVIEW
 ACTION: DENIED
  
 1) DISCREPANCY IN OWNERSHIP, PLEASE REVIEW THE PROPERTY
 APPRAISER'S OWNERS FOR THIS BLOCK BY LOT NUMBER AND THE
 SKETCH OF SURVEY, FOR LOT# 3 THE SURVEY INDICATES IT IS
 PART OF THE CITYPLACE NORTH II LLC WHERE AS THE
 PROPERTY APPRAISERS OFFICE INDICATES LOT 3 WAS BROKEN
 INTO 3.1 AND 3.2 NEITHER OWNER BEING CITYPLACE NORTH II
 LLC.
  
 2) IT WOULD ALSO APPEAR THAT TWO SEPERATE PERMITS
 SHOULD BE APPLIED FOR SINCE THERE IS A ALLEY WAY
 BETWEEN THE NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN PROPERTIES. POSSIBLY
 A UNITY OF TITLE WOULD BE INVOLVED.
  
 STARTING AUGUST 21, 2009, THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT WILL BE CLOSED ON FRIDAYS UNTIL FURTHER
 NOTICE.
  
 OPENING HOURS MONDAY - THURSDAY WILL REMAIN AT 8:00 AM
 - 5:00 PM.
  
 JIM WITMER C. B. O.
 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II
  
 TEL: (561)805-6715
 FAX: (561)805-6731
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
 SURVEY:
 WWW.SURVEYMONKEY.COM/WESTPALMBEACHCONSTRUCTIONSERVICES
  
 PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS
 LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS
 REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO
 THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE
 THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE.
  
 MEMBER OF BOAF: BUILDING OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION OF
 FLORIDA SAVING LIVES AND PROPERTY SINCE 1953
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2009-09-18 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2009-09-18 Time 15:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2009-09-18 Time 15:10 Sent To  
Notes
2009-09-18 15:12:03** FAILED REVIEW **
  
 PLANS ARE NOT COMPLETE FOR REVIEW. THERE IS INFORMATION
 NO YET SHOWN FOR MINIMUM CODE COMPLIANCE. THERE MAY
 VERY WELL BE NEW COMMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING REVIEW ONCE
 PLANS ARE COMPLETED.
  
 1) NOTE: PLANS HAVE ONLY BEEN SUBMITTED FOR PLANS
 REVIEW AND NOT UNDER PERMIT APPLICATION. THIS IS BEING
 NOTED AS THERE ARE CODE CHANGES COMING UP ON OCT 1ST,
 2009.
 THIS WILL CHANGE TO THE 2008 NFPA-70 AND ALSO CHANGES
 UNDER THE 2007 FBC. THERE WILL BE A SECOND ROUND OF
 2009 REVISIONS TO THE FBC.
  
 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM ALL OTHER TRADES AS
 THEY WILL GREATLY AFFECT THE SUBMISSION OF FUTURE
 DOCUMENTS AND ELECTRICAL PLANS. EXAMPLES WOULD BE:
 SEPARATE PERMITS FOR SEPARATE PROPERTIES, UNITY OF
 TITLES, LIGHTING LEVELS PERMITTED. ETC
  
 3) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR
 ELECTRICAL SYSTEM. PLEASE SUBMIT A COMPLETE ELECTRICAL
 RISER DIAGRAM FOR SERVICE OR SERVICES WHICH WILL FEED
 LIGHTING. BASED ON THE FACT THESE ARE TWO SEPARATE
 LEGAL PROPERTIES, THERE MAY BE A NEED TO HAVE TWO
 SEPARATE ELECTRICAL SERVICES.
 PLEASE SEE NEC , 110.9,215.5,220,230,240,310 ETC GIVEN
 AS GENERAL COMMENTS AS THERE IS NO INFORMATION ON PLANS
 TO REVIEW FOR MINIMUM CODE COMPLIANCE.
  
 4) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE FIXTURE INFORMATION IS COMPLETE
 ON PLANS. PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE 13-415.AB.2.2 FOR
 ALLOWANCES OF UNCOVERED PARKING AREAS.
  
 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 13-415.AB.1.4 FOR REQUIRED
 OUTSIDE LIGHTING CONTROLS. MUST MEET MINIMUM CONTROLS
 AS SET-FORTH IN SECTIONS GIVEN.
  
  
 IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT
 TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO
 CONTACT THIS REVIEWER.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 1 Status   Date 2009-09-14 Cont ID  
Sent By dlauderm Date 2009-09-14 Time 10:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dlauderm Date 2009-09-08 Time 09:04 Sent To  
Notes
2009-09-14 11:26:44RESPOND TO;
 DEAN S. LAUDERMILK, PROJECT COORDINATOR
 W-494-1083, F-494-1116, [email protected]
 4TH FLOOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
  
 FAILED.
 GENERAL:
 G.1. COMMENTS FROM PPRC CASE #Z09060010 HAVE NOT BEEN
 MET.
 G.2. COMMENTS BY OTHER REVIEWERS IN CONSTRUCTION
 SERVICES MUST BE MET PRIOR TO SUBMISSION TO ENGINEERING
 SERVICES.
 G.3. APPROVAL FROM PLANNING HAS TO BE GIVEN PRIOR TO
 FINAL APPROVAL FROM ENGINEERING SERVICES. PLANS WILL
 NEED TO BE REDRAWN AND THEN SUBMITTED TO ENGINEERING.
 STORM WATER CALCULATIONS, WITH PRE-VERSUS POST FLOWS
 ARE REQUIRED.
 G.4. WHEN PLAN IS APPROVED ADDITIONAL PERMITS WILL BE
 REQUIRED FOR WORK IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF THE ALLEY AND
 S. ROSEMARY. PERMITS CAN BE SUBMITTED TO ENGINEERING
 SERVICES/TRAFFIC DIVISION.
 G.5. ALL OF THE PPRC AND COMMENTS BY CONSTRUCTION
 SERVICES NEED TO BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SUBMISSION TO
 ENGINEERING SERVICES.
 G.6. DEMO PLAN REQUIRED FOR EXISTING STRUCTURE.
 SITE:
 S.1. THIS IS TWO SEPARATE SITES. WHAT IS THE PLAN,
 DIVIDE IT INTO TWO PERMITS AND TWO SITES OR COMBINE THE
 PROPERTIES UNDER A UNITY OF TITLE?
 S.2. IS THE ALLEY TO BE ABANDONED? IF NOT, AND THIS IS
 TO BE A UNIFIED SITE, THEN PRIVATE UTILITY LINES WILL
 BE CROSSING THE ALLEY (ELECTRIC AND IRRIGATION) A
 PRIVATE UTILITY PERMIT WILL NEED TO BE APPLIED FOR.
 WARNING THE ALLEY IS FILLED WITH BURIED UTILITIES, THEY
 SHOULD BE SHOWN TO REDUCE THE CHANCE OF THE CONTRACTORS
 CUTTING THEM.
 S.3. THE REDESIGN OF THE PARKING LOT AS SHOWN WILL NOT
 WORK. IF I WANT TO ACCESS THE PARKING LOT AND NOT PAY A
 PARKING FEE I WILL JUST DRIVE DOWN THE UNPAVED ALLEY TO
 THE EAST DRIVEWAY AND PULL IN, BY-PASSING THE AUTOMATIC
 GATES AT THE WEST ENTRANCE AND EXIT. I COULD LEAVE THE
 SAME WAY.
 LANDSCAPING:
 L.1. SWALES CAN NOT HAVE HEDGES AND MULCH IN THEM.
 RUN-OFF WILL TAKE THE MULCH AND FILL THE STORM WATER
 SYSTEM, HEDGES WILL SLOW THE FLOW OF WATER AND
 EVENTUALLY FILL THE SWALE. EITHER REMOVE ALL
 LANDSCAPING FROM THE SWALES, OR REROUTE THE STORM WATER
 FLOW.
 IRRIGATION:
 I.1. IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN IS TOO GREAT FOR A 5/8,
 ?? OR 1??? METER, THAT IS THE ONLY SIZE METERS THAT CAN
 BE USED ON THE SERVICE SHOWN TO BE USED FOR THE
 IRRIGATION SYSTEM. REDESIGN THE SYSTEM SO THERE ARE
 MORE ZONES OR INCREASE THE METER, BACKFLOW PREVENTER
 AND PIPE SIZES TO ALLOW FOR THE REQUIRED FLOWS. THERE
 ARE 4 ZONES SHOWN OVER 30 GPM EACH, A 5/8??? METER WILL
 ONLY ALLOW 10 GPM FOR CONTINUOUS USE, A ????? METER
 WILL ONLY ALLOW 15 GPM CONTINUOUS USE, A 1??? METER
 WILL ONLY ALLOW A 25 GPM CONTINUOUS USE.
 I.2. THE IRRIGATION PLAN SHOWS A 1-1/2??? DOUBLE CHECK
 BACKFLOW PREVENTER TO BE INSTALLED, THERE IS NO SERVICE
 LARGE ENOUGH FOR THIS SIZE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AT THE
 LOCATION SHOWN (NORTH SIDEWALK). THERE IS A 2??? WATER
 SERVICE, JUST SOUTH OF THE ALLEY ON THE EAST SIDE OF S.
 ROSEMARY, IT IS SUGGESTED THAT THIS SERVICE BE USED IF
 THE ZONE FLOWS ARE TO BE KEPT.
 C-1 PAVING AND DRAINAGE PLAN:
 C-1.1. NORTH GATE ARM EXTENDS INTO ALLEY RIGHT-OF-WAY,
 MOVE IT NORTH.
 C-1.2. THERE IS NO WAY IN OR OUT OF THE NORTH PARKING
 LOT FOR A PEDESTRIAN, ADD SIDEWALK OUT TO THE CITY
 SIDEWALK, ???LIKE??? ON THE SOUTH SIDE.
 C-1.3. CHECK THE ZONING REGS, I BELIEVE THAT THERE HAS
 TO BE A GREEN SPACE BETWEEN EVERY 10 PARKING SPACES.
 C-1.4. IN THE NORTH PARKING LOT AT THE NW, NE, AND SE
 CORNERS OF THE LOT, IT APPEARS TO CONFLICT WITH
 VEHICLES PARKING, THEY LOOK LIKE THEY WILL HIT EACH
 OTHER. IN THE SW PARKING SPACE, IT APPEARS THE PARKED
 VEHICLE WILL PARTIALLY BLOCK THE EXIT LANE. THE PROBLEM
 APPEARS TO EXIST IN THE SOUTH LOT ALSO.
 C-1.5. THE STORM WATER DESIGN WILL NOT WORK, IT WILL
 OVERFLOW INTO THE PROPERTIES TO THE EAST DURING A 25
 YEAR RAIN EVENT AND THIS CAN NOT BE ALLOWED.
 C-1.6. THE SWALES CAN NOT BE USED TO DIRECT THE FLOW OF
 WATER, NOT WHEN THE SWALES ARE FULL OF HEDGES AND
 FILLED WITH MULCH. REDESIGN.
 C-1.7. WHO HAS RIGHT-OF-WAY BETWEEN THE TWO PARKING
 LOTS AND THE ALLEY? ADD STOPS SIGNS, STOP BARS TO THE
 PLAN.
 C-1.8. ADD STOP SIGN AND STOP BAR TO THE ALLEY WHERE
 THE PARKING LOT EMPTIES INTO ROSEMARY.
 ELECTRICAL PLAN:
 E.1. PLAN SHOWS ELECTRICAL METER AND PANEL IN CENTER OF
 ALLEY, RELOCATE OUT OF ALLEY RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
  
2009-09-09 09:58:29RESPOND TO;
 DEAN LAUDERMILK, PROJECT COORDINATOR
 W-494-1083, F-1116, [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2009-08-28 Cont ID  
Sent By mcarsill Date 2009-08-28 Time 08:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mcarsill Date 2009-08-28 Time 08:09 Sent To  
Notes
2009-08-28 08:13:09312 SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE
 PERMIT NUMBER 09080455
  
 1. DEMOLITION, RENOVATION, AND CONSTRUCTION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. SEE BUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTES ON PAGE
 SP-1.0.
  
 2. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 70, THE
 NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE.
  
 3. NO OTHER COMMENTS PROVIDED AT THIS TIME.
  
  
 MIKE CARSILLO, BATTALION CHIEF
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION
 804-4709 PHONE
 804-4774 FAX
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 2009-09-18 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmartine Date 2009-08-19 Time 14:11 Sent To  
Notes
2009-08-19 14:14:24C-3
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2009-08-24 Cont ID  
Sent By rkussner Date 2009-08-24 Time 15:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rkussner Date 2009-08-24 Time 15:52 Sent To  
Notes
2009-08-24 17:11:01***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED***
  
 1. LIVE OAK TREES CANNOT BE PLANTED WITHIN 30 FEET OF
 ANY OVERHEAD POWER LINES. PLEASE REFER TO THE FPL
 WEBSITE AND CLICK ONTO "PLANT THE RIGHT TREE IN THE
 RIGHT PLACE" WHICH REGULATES WHICH TREE SPECIES CAN BE
 PLANTED UNDER OR IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO OVERHEAD LINES.
  
 2. PURSUSNT TO SECTION 94-443 (C)(3)(B), ONE INTERIOR
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EVERY TEN
 PARKING SPACES OR FRACTION THEREOF. INTERIOR LANDSCAPE
 ISLANDS SHALL BE AT LEAST FIVE FEET WIDE, EXCLUDING THE
 REQUIRED CURB, AND SHALL CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR
 FLOWERING TREE. NO INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLANDS HAVE BEEN
 PROPOSED.
  
 3. PROPOSED LANDSCAPING IS SHOWN WITHIN A RETENTION
 SWALE. LIVE OAK TREES CANNOT SURVIVE IN AREAS THAT
 FLOOD.
  
 4. THERE ARE EXISTING SABAL PALMS THROUGHOUT THE SITE.
 IF THEY ARE IN GOOD CONDITION, THEY SHALL BE SAVED AND
 RELOCATED TO ANOTHER LOCATION. A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT
 IS REQUIRED.
  
 5. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443 (C)(3)(A), EACH ROW OF
 PARKING SPACES SHALL BE TERMINATED BY LANDSCAPE
 ISLANDS. ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE IS REQUIRED TO BE
 PLANTED IN EVERY TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND. TREES ARE
 MISSING IN MOST OF THE TERMINAL ISLANDS.
  
 6. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-445 (4)(G)(3), AUTOMATIC
 IRRIGATION SYSTEMS SHALL BE USED FOR THE CULTIVATED
 LANDSCAPE AREAS FOR ALL PROPERTIES. THIS INCLUDES THE
 ADJACENT RIGHTS-OF-WAY PLANTINGS.
  
 7. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443 (C)(2), TABLE XIV-1,
 TREES SHALL BE PLANTED AT 30-FOOT INTERVALS AND HEDGES
 SHALL BE PLANTED AT TWO-FOOT INTEVALS FOR EACH REQUIRED
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER. THE REQUIRED HEDGE AND TREES ARE
 MISSING ALONG BOTH SIDES OF THE ALLEY. IN ADDITION, THE
 BUFFER SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN FIVE FEET IN WIDTH.
  
 8. THERE IS A CONFLICT BETWEEN A PROPOSED STREET LIGHT
 AND A TREE ALONG THE NORTH PERIMETER OF THE NORTH
 PARKING LOT. STREET LIGHTS SHALL BE CENTERED BETWEEN
 THE TREES AND NO CLOSER THAN 15 FEET FROM THE TRUNK.
  
 9. THE HEDGE ALONG THE EAST PERIMETER OF THE NORTH
 PARKING LOT SHALL BE PLANTED ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE
 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAINTENANCE.
  
 10. IN KEEPING WITH XERISCAPE GUIDELINES, GROUND COVER
 SHOULD BE PLANTED INSTEAD OF SOD IN THE SMALLER AREAS
 AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE SITE. A TIERING OF THE
 PLANT MATERIAL ADJACENT TO THE RIGHTS-OF-WAYS IS
 RECOMMENDED.
 WHEN THE HEDGE IS PLANTED ALONG THE INTERIOR PERIMETER
 OF THE SITE, GROUND COVER SHOULD BE PLANTED BETWEEN THE
 HEDGE AND THE CITY SIDEWALK. FOR THE SIDES OF THE
 PARKING LOT THAT ARE ADJACENT TO OTHER PROPERTIES,
 GROUND COVER CAN BE PLANTED BETWEEN THE HEDGE AND THE
 PARKING LOT.
  
 11. PLEASE SUBMIT A CERTIFIED COST ESTIMATE THAT
 INCLUDES THE TOTAL COST OF ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIRALS AND
 LABOR, BROKEN DOWN INTO UNIT COST.
  
 12. THE NORTH ARROW IS FACING IN THE WRONG DIRECTION ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT
 KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462.
  
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2009-08-19 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2009-08-19 Time 16:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2009-08-19 Time 16:52 Sent To  
Notes
2009-08-19 16:55:48DENIED
 REFERENCE:
 FBC-2007 PLUMBING
  
 1. LI-1 POINT OF CONNECTION DETAIL INDICATES A FEBCO
 805 V DOUBLE CHECK BACKFLOW FOR THE IRRIGATION. THIS IS
 NOT APPROVED. AN RPZB BACKFLOW IS REQUIRED PER TABLE
 608.1.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE
 THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY
 PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER
 LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER,
 WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE,
 IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION
 PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND
 WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE
 ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE
 ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE
 COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED.
 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS
 (561) 805-6721
 FAX (561) 805-6731
 E-MAIL [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2009-09-14 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 2009-08-25 Time 13:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 2009-08-25 Time 13:49 Sent To  
Notes
2009-08-25 14:14:111. SURFACE PARKING AS A PRIMARY USE IS NOT PERMITTED AT
 THIS LOCATION. IF CODE MODIFICATION IS IN PROCESS,
 PERMIT CAN NOT BE APPROVED UNTIL CODE CHANGES ARE IN
 EFFECT.
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL INFORMATION OF MODIFICATION ON
 ROW TO ALLOW ALLEY TO BE WIDEN. EXISTING VS PROPOSED.
 3. SP-1.0 DRAWINGS IS VERY DIFFICULT TO READ. PLEASE
 PROVIDE A NEW COPY WITH BETTER RESOLUTION.
 4. TICKET BOOTHS CANNOT BE LOCATED WITHIN THE REQUIRED
 LANDSCAPE AREA.
 5. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW ALLEY CIRCULATION WILL BE
 MAINTAINED.


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved