Plan Review Stops For Permit 08120369 |
Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-12-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jnguyen |
Date |
2008-12-17 |
Time |
09:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jnguyen |
Date |
2008-12-17 |
Time |
09:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-12-17 09:37:34 | BACK ON 11-24-2008, THE ARCHITECT, STEPHEN L. BORUFF | | STOPPED BY MY OFFICE WITH A SITE PLAN FOR THIS PARCEL | | (PCN# 74434322000050050), WHERE THE CITY OF WPB LIBRARY | | CURRENTLY IS. ONCE THE CITY LIBRARY WAS GOING TO BE | | DEMOLISHED, THE SITE PLAN SHOWED THE PROSPECTIVE | | CONSTRUCTION OF A VISITOR'S CENTER ON THE NORTH SIDE OF | | THIS PARCEL WITH ACCESS OFF N CLEMATIS ST & A PAVILLION | | BUILDING ON THE SOUTH SIDE WITH ACCESS OFF S FLAGLER | | DR. I ISSUED THE PRIMARY ADDRESS OF 100 N CLEMATIS ST | | TO THE PROPOSED VISITOR'S CENTER (WHICH THIS PARTICULAR | | PERMIT RELATES TO IN INITIATING PHASE 1A). THE NEW | | VISITOR'S CENTER WILL TAKE OVER & ASSUME THE SOON-TO-BE | | DEMOLISHED CITY LIBRARY'S OLD PRIOR ADDRESS OF 100 N | | CLEMATIS ST, WHEREAS THE PROPOSED PAVILLION BUILDING | | WAS ISSUED AN ADDRESS OF 101 S FLAGLER DR. | 2008-12-16 16:11:05 | NEED ADDRESS FOR THIS LOCATION - OLD LIBRARY IS THERE | | AT THIS TIME |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-09-10 |
Time |
12:00 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-09-10 |
Time |
11:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-09-10 12:01:11 | SHOP DRAWINGS AND UPDATE OF NOA |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-05-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-05-19 |
Time |
13:49 |
Rev Time |
0.75 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-05-19 |
Time |
13:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-05-19 13:20:23 | REVISION# 3 SHEET S1, S1A, S2, S3, & S5. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-01 |
Time |
10:25 |
Rev Time |
3.33 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-03-31 |
Time |
10:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-03-31 10:31:06 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 08120369 | | ADD: 100 N CLEMATIS ST | | CONT: CATALFUMO | | TEL: (561)282-8265 | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | APRIL 1/ 2009 | | | | ARCHITECT: STEPHEN BORUFF | | STEPHEN L. BORUFF, AIA | | ARCHITECTS+ PLANNERS, INC. | | | | STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: TOLLIVER J. FRAZIER | | ONM&J STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS | | | | | | BUILDING PROVISO: | | | | | | 1) ROOFING SYSTEMS: | | ROOF INSULATION REVIEW THE MINIMUM THICKNESS FOR A 20.4 | | R-VALUE SEE ENERGY INPUT DATA REPORT | | PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA 07-0228.04 | | DECK TYPE 21: STEEL INSULATED | | DECK DESCRIPTION 18-22 GAUGE TYPE B | | SYSTEM TYPE B(1) | | MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE -75 PSF LIMITATION # 7 ALLOWS | | FOR ENHANCED FASTENING S-4 FOR THE ROOF ZONE 3 REQUIRES | | -107. | | THE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS CAN BE COMPLETED BY EITHER A | | ARCHITECT, ENGINEER OR REGISTEERED ROOF CONSULTANT. | | | | ARCHITECT RESPONSE: ROOFING SHOP DRAWING/ PRODUCT | | SUBMITTAL SHALL INCLUDE FASTENER CALCULATIONS. | | FASTENER CALCULATIONS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED AS PART OF | | THE ROOFING PERMIT UNDER SEPERATE REVIEW. | | | | 2) FBC BUILDING 3110.1.2 / CITY OF WPB CODE OF | | ORDINANCES SECTION 94-546. STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN AN | | "A" FLOOD ZONE. A FLOOD ELEVATION CERTIFICATE WILL BE | | REQUIRED BEFORE A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY WILL BE | | ISSUED. | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-02-23 |
Time |
14:43 |
Rev Time |
7.77 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-02-23 |
Time |
14:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-02-23 16:54:24 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 08120369 | | ADD: 100 N CLEMATIS ST | | CONT: CATALFUMO | | TEL: (561)282-8265 | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | FEB. 23,2006 | | 2ND REVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | 1A) INFORMATIONAL: WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE | | INDICATE THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS | | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL | | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE | | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO | | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED | | COOPERATION. | | | | 1B) INFORMATIONAL: PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, | | PLANS, REPORTS, REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR | | SUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW FOR PERMIT. 106.1* /2004 | | SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE | | CODE. | | | | 1C) COMPLIED. | | | | 2) QUEATIONABLE SOILS COMPLIED. SEE FOUNDATION PERMIT | | FOR SOILS ENGINEEER. | | | | 3) BUILDING PROVSO:BUILDING LOCATION: THIS STRUCTURE IS | | LOCATED WITH A A-5 FLOOD ZONE. THE FINISH FLOOR CAN NOT | | HAVE A FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION LESS THAN 7'-6". | | | | 4-7) COMPLIED. | | | | 8) SHEET VC A-1.0 ACCES RAMP SECTION INDICATES THE USE | | OF STAINLESS STEEL CABLES ON ALUMINUM POST HANDRAIL | | SYSTEM. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH: | | 1607.7.1.1 CONCENTRATED LOAD. | | HANDRAIL ASSEMBLIES AND GUARDS SHALL BE ABLE TO RESIST | | A SINGLE CONCENTRATED LOAD OF 200 POUNDS (0.89 KN), | | APPLIED IN ANY DIRECTION AT ANY POINT ALONG THE TOP, | | AND HAVE ATTACHMENT DEVICES AND SUPPORTING STRUCTURE TO | | TRANSFER THIS LOADING TO APPROPRIATE STRUCTURAL | | ELEMENTS OF THE BUILDING. THIS LOAD NEED NOT BE ASSUMED | | TO ACT CONCURRENTLY WITH THE LOADS SPECIFIED IN THE | | PRECEDING PARAGRAPH. | | 1607.7.1.2 COMPONENTS. | | INTERMEDIATE RAILS (ALL THOSE EXCEPT THE HANDRAIL), | | BALUSTERS AND PANEL FILLERS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO | | WITHSTAND A HORIZONTALLY APPLIED NORMAL LOAD OF 50 | | POUNDS (0.22 KN) ON AN AREA EQUAL TO 1 SQUARE FOOT | | (0.093M2), INCLUDING OPENINGS AND SPACE BETWEEN RAILS. | | REACTIONS DUE TO THIS LOADING ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE | | SUPERIMPOSED WITH THOSE OF SECTION 1607.7.1 OR | | 1607.7.1.1. | | | | 9) VC A-1.0, VC A-5.0 & VC A-6.0 ALL INDICATE THE USE | | OF HI-LO DRINKING FOUNTAINS SHEET VC A-6.0 INDICATES | | THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT THE UNITS ARE TO BE SEET AT BUT FAIL | | TO INDICATE THE MINIMUMHIGTH TO NOT BE CONSIDERED | | PROTRUDING OBJECTS 11-4.4.1.SEE FIGURE 11-8(A)(B). THE | | LOW SIDE IS IN COMPLIANCE BUT THE HIGH SIDE WOULD NEED | | A APRON TO DROP IT TO THE DESIRED HEIGTH. | | | | 10) COMPLIED. | | | | 11) 2ND REQUEST, DISCREPANCY IN PLANS BETWEEN VC A-3.0 | | & VC A-7.0 PLEASE REVIEW WHERE THE TRUE LOWEST POINT IN | | THE ROOF WILL BE AND THE DISTANCE FROM THE FRONT EDGE | | OF THE ROOF. IT APPEARS THE ROOF DRAINS ARE LOCATED | | APPROXIMATELY 5'-9" BACK FROM THE FRONT DEGE OF THE | | ROOF WHERE AS THE SCUPPERS ARE LOCATED ONLY 4'-0" AWAY | | FROM THE FRONT EDGE OF THE ROOF.SHEET VC A-7.0 IT | | APPEARS THE ROOF DRAINS ARE NOT LOCATED IN THE LOWEST | | PORTION OF ROOF. 1503.4. THE NEW DETAIL 2 LOCATED | | WITHIN SHEET VC A-3.0 THE ROOF DRAIN IS LOCATED HIGHER | | THAN THE HIGHEST POINT IN THE CRICKET, IN OHTER WORDS | | THE ROOF DRAINS WILL NOT TAKE ANY OF THE RUN OFF AND | | THE OVER FLOW SCUPPERS WILL TAKE ALL THE ROOF RAIN | | WATER. AS DRAWN 9" OF WATER WILL POND. 1503.4.3. | | | | 12) 2ND REQUEST PLEASE PROVIDE A ROOFING CUT SECTION AT | | THE ROOF DRAINS INDICATING THE TYPE OF INSULATION TO BE | | INSTALLED, PLEASE ALSO NOTE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | INDACATE A MINIMUM OF R-20.4 VALUE FOR ROOF INSULATION. | | WITHIN THE ROOFING PRODUCT APPROVAL PLEASE HIGHLIGHT OR | | CIRCLE THE SUB-SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED AND PLEASE | | SPECIFY THE TYPE OF INSULATION AND HICKNESS IT WILL | | TAKE TO MEET THE REQUIREMEENTS OF THE ENERGY CODE, | | PLEASE SEE BOAFS INFORMAL INTERPRETATION ON | | 13-404.ABCD.1 THE NEW DETAIL# 2 LOCATED ON SHEET VC | | A3.0 INDICATES A NOTE OF 2" MINIMUM INSULATION AT THE | | ROOF DRAIN. THE ROOFING PRODUCT APPROVAL SUB,MITTED | | INDICATES THE USE OF POLYTHERM ROOFINSULATION TO | | ACHIEVE A R-VALUE OF 20.4 THE MINIMUM ROOF INSULATION | | LOCATED AT THE ROOF DRAIN WOULD BE 3.25 INCHES, SEE | | MANUFACTURERS SPEC. | | | | 13) 1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS IN WIND-BORNE | | DEBRIS REGIONS, EXTERIOR GLAZING THAT RECEIVES POSITIVE | | PRESSURE IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 M) IN BUILDINGS | | SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE OPENINGS AND THE BALANCE OF | | GLAZED OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE | | ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH GLAZING THAT RECEIVES | | POSITIVE PRESSURE IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR PROTECTED WITH | | AN IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS | | OF SSTD 12, ASTM E 1886 AND ASTM E 1996, OR MIAMI-DADE | | TAS 201, 202 AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN AS FOLLOWS: 1. | | GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 FEET (9.1 M) OF GRADE | | SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LARGE MISSILE TEST. | | 2. GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED MORE THAN 30 FEET (9.1 M) | | ABOVE GRADE SHALL MEET THE PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL | | MISSILE TEST. | | | | FL BLD CODE 1609.6.2.2 COMPONENTS & CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 | | COPIES OF PRODUCT TESTING REPORTS, EITHER MISSING | | REPORTS OR MISSING INFORMATION ARE AS FOLLOWS: | | 13A) FIXED WINDOWS/STOREFRONT / (CURTAINWALL) HIGHLIGHT | | WHICH SYSTEM IS TO BE USED, SHEET VC A 8.1 DETAIL 5 AND | | 9 . DETAIL# 5 INDICATES USE OF A 1X FASTENED TO A STEEL | | COLUMN NO INFORMATION IS PROVIDED | | FOR THE ATTACHMENT OF THE WOOD BUCK TO THE STEEL COLUMN | | IN THE ARCHITECTURAL NOR STRUCTURAL SHEET. THE SECOND | | ISSUE IS DETAIL# 9 THE TOP OF THE WINDOW FRAME IS | | ATTACHED DIRECTLY TO THE STEEL BUT NO | | INFORMATION IS PROVIDED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL NOR | | STRUCTURAL SHEET. | | 13B) EXTERIOR GLAZED DOORS - TWO PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE | | SUBMITTED FOR GLAZED DOORS FL5705 CORRIM AND YKK NOA | | 06-0306.02 WHICH IS TO BE INSTALLED? | | 13C) EXTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS- NO PRODUCT APPROVALS | | WERE SUBMITTED. | | 13D) METAL WALL PANELS( WALL LOUVERS) OK | | 13E) WALL LOUVERS OK | | 13F) SOFFIT MATERIALS -STUCCO NO APPROVALS REQUIRED | | 13G) ROOFING SYSTEMS | | 1) ROOF INSULATION REVIEW THE MINIMUM THICKNESS FOR A | | 20.4 R-VALUE SEE ENERGY INPUT DATA REPORT | | 2) PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA 07-1030.01 | | DECK TYPE 21: STEEL INSULATED | | DECK DESCRIPTION 18-22 GAUGE TYPE B | | SYSTEM TYPE B | | MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE -90 PSF LIMITATION # 7 ALLOWS | | FOR ENHANCED FASTENING S-4 FOR THE ROOF ZONE 3 REQUIRES | | -107. THE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS CAN BE COMPLETED BY | | EITHER A ARCHITECT, ENGINEER OR REGISTEERED ROOF | | CONSULTANT. | | | | 14-15) COMPLIED. | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-01-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-01-02 |
Time |
15:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-01-02 |
Time |
15:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-01-02 16:58:01 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 08120369 | | ADD: 100 N CLEMATIS ST | | CONT: CATALFUMO | | TEL: (561)282-8265 | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | REVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | 1A) INFORMATIONAL: WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE | | INDICATE THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS | | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL | | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE | | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO | | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED | | COOPERATION. | | | | 1B) INFORMATIONAL: PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, | | PLANS, REPORTS, REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR | | SUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW FOR PERMIT. 106.1* /2004 | | SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE | | CODE. | | | | 1C) INFORMATIONAL: PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT (FIRST | | TIME REVIEW) AFTER JULY 1ST, 2007 SHALL BE REVIEWED TO | | THE 2004 FBC BUILDING WITH THE 2007 SUPPLEMENTS. SHEET | | S-3 INDICATES TWICE TO BE DESIGNED TO THE 2004 FBC WITH | | 2006 SUPPLEMENTS, PLEASE UPDATE TO THE 2007 | | SUPPLEMENTS. | | | | 2) QUEATIONABLE SOILS WITHIN THE PERMIT PACKAGE IS A | | PRELIMINARY REPORT FORM ARDAMAN FILE # 08-2035. WITHIN | | THE REPORT IT STATES "WE WILL PERSENT SPECIFIC | | RECOMMENDATIONS ONCE THE NATURE OF THE BUILDINGS AND | | THE STRUCTURAL LOADS ARE DEFINED." APPRENTLY THERE IS | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO | | ARDAMAN SINCE A AUGOR PILE AND GRADE BEAM FOUNDATION | | HAS BEEN DESIGNED. | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE ADDITIONAL SOILS REPORT WITH THE | | RECOMMENDATION FOR AUGOR CAST PLIE SYSTEM. | | 1802.2.1 QUESTIONABLE SOIL. WHERE THE SAFE-SUSTAINING | | POWER OF THE SOIL IS IN DOUBT, OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING | | VALUE SUPERIOR TO THAT SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS | | CLAIMED, THE BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE | | NECESSARY INVESTIGATION BE MADE. SUCH INVESTIGATION | | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 1802.4 | | THROUGH 1802.6 . | | | | 3) BUILDING LOCATION: THIS STRUCTURE IS LOCATED WITH A | | A-5 FLOOD ZONE. THE FINISH FLOOR CAN NOT HAVE A FINISH | | FLOOR ELEVATION LESS THAN 7'-6". AT THE EAST END OF THE | | BUILDING ELECTRIC ROOM# 104 THE FLOOR ELEVATION IS | | INDICATED AT 5'-6" OR 2 FEET BELOW THE ALLOWABLE FINISH | | FLOOR LEVEL. | | | | 4) SHEET A1.1 PHASE 1A TEMORARY CONSTRUCTION PLAN, | | INDICATES A 4'-0" WAIDE WALKWAY ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE | | BUILDING. PLEASE GIVE ELEVATION MARKERS ON THIS | | SIDEWALK FROM THE EXISTING SIDEWALK TO THE EXTERIOR | | LANDING IN FORNT OF THE RESTROOMS AT ELEVATION 7'-6". | | THE DIFFERENCE IN GRADE MAY MAKE THIS PORTION OF | | SIDEWALK TO BE CONSIDERED A RAMP AND REQUIRE HANDRAILS | | ON BOTH SIDES, AND GUARD RAILS. 11-4.8. | | | | 5) DURING PHASE 1A ARE ALL OF THE PILING AND GRADE | | BEAMS GOING TO BE PLACED AT THIS TIME OR WILL SOME OF | | THIS WORK OCCUR DURING A LATER PHASE? | | | | 6) BOTH LS1.0 & VC A-1.0 INDICATE THE STAIRWAY DIRECTLY | | IN FRONT OF THE RESTROOMS. THE HANDRAIL EXTENSIONS ( | | HORIZONTAL) ARE MISSING AT THE BOTTOM OF THE STAIRS. | | 11-4.9.4(2) SEE FIGURE 11-19(C-D) | | | | 7) SHEET VC A-1.0 ACCESS RAMP DETAILS 1& 2 BOTH | | INDICATE HANDRAILS LOCATED 2'-6" ABOVE THE RAMPS | | SURFACE, PLEASE REVIEW 11-4.8.5(5) TOP OF HANDRAIL | | GRIPPING SURFACES SHALL BE MOUNTED BETWEEN 34INCHES AND | | 38 INCHES ABOVE THE RAMP SURFACES. | | | | 8) SHEET VC A-1.0 ACCES RAMP SECTION INDICATES THE USE | | OF STAINLESS STEEL CABLES ON ALUMINUM POST HANDRAIL | | SYSTEM. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH: | | 1607.7.1.1 CONCENTRATED LOAD. | | HANDRAIL ASSEMBLIES AND GUARDS SHALL BE ABLE TO RESIST | | A SINGLE CONCENTRATED LOAD OF 200 POUNDS (0.89 KN), | | APPLIED IN ANY DIRECTION AT ANY POINT ALONG THE TOP, | | AND HAVE ATTACHMENT DEVICES AND SUPPORTING STRUCTURE TO | | TRANSFER THIS LOADING TO APPROPRIATE STRUCTURAL | | ELEMENTS OF THE BUILDING. THIS LOAD NEED NOT BE ASSUMED | | TO ACT CONCURRENTLY WITH THE LOADS SPECIFIED IN THE | | PRECEDING PARAGRAPH. | | 1607.7.1.2 COMPONENTS. | | INTERMEDIATE RAILS (ALL THOSE EXCEPT THE HANDRAIL), | | BALUSTERS AND PANEL FILLERS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO | | WITHSTAND A HORIZONTALLY APPLIED NORMAL LOAD OF 50 | | POUNDS (0.22 KN) ON AN AREA EQUAL TO 1 SQUARE FOOT | | (0.093M2), INCLUDING OPENINGS AND SPACE BETWEEN RAILS. | | REACTIONS DUE TO THIS LOADING ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE | | SUPERIMPOSED WITH THOSE OF SECTION 1607.7.1 OR | | 1607.7.1.1. | | | | 9) VC A-1.0, VC A-5.0 & VC A-6.0 ALL INDICATE THE USE | | OF HI-LO DRINKING FOUNTAINS SHEET VC A-6.0 INDICATES | | THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT THE UNITS ARE TO BE SEET AT BUT FAIL | | TO INDICATE THE MINIMUMHIGTH TO NOT BE CONSIDERED | | PROTRUDING OBJECTS 11-4.4.1.SEE FIGURE 11-8(A)(B). | | | | 10) VC A-3.0 THE LEFT HAND SECTION OF THE ROOF SYSTEM | | THE PLANS INDICATE DRAINAGE OF THE ROOF WITH SECONDARY | | DRAINAGE OVERFLOOW SCUPPER IN FLASHING, FORTHIS AREA OF | | ROOFING SAME ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF ROOF, THIS IS THE | | ONLY DRAINAGE FOR THIS PORTION OF ROOF, ALSO THERE IS | | NO DOWNSPOUT AS LOCATED ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE ROOF. | | 1503.4.2 & 1503.4.3. | | | | 11) DISCREPANCY IN PLANS BETWEEN VC A-3.0 & VC A-7.0 | | PLEASE REVIEW WHERE THE TRUE LOWEST POINT IN THE ROOF | | WILL BE AND THE DISTANCE FROM THE FRONT EDGE OF THE | | ROOF. IT APPEARS THE ROOF DRAINS ARE | | LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 5'-9" BACK FROM THE FRONT DEGE OF | | THE ROOF WHERE AS THE SSCUPPERS ARE LOCATED ONLY 4'-0" | | AWAY FROM THE FRONT EDGE OF THE ROOF.SHHE VC A-7.0 IT | | APPEARS THE ROOF DRAINS ARE NOT LOCATED IN THE LOWEST | | PORTION OF ROOF. 1503.4. | | | | 12) PLEASE PROVIDE A ROOFING CUT SECTION AT THE ROOF | | DRAINS INDICATING THE TYPE OF INSULATION TO BE | | INSTALLED, PLEASE ALSO NOTE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | INDACATE A MINIMUM OF R-20.4 VALUE FOR ROOF INSULATION. | | WITHIN THE ROOFING PRODUCT APPROVAL PLEASE HIGHLIGHT OR | | CIRCLE THE SUB-SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED AND PLEASE | | SPECIFY THE TYPE OF INSULATION AND HICKNESS IT WILL | | TAKE TO MEET THE REQUIREMEENTS OF THE ENERGY CODE, | | PLEASE SEE BOAFS INFORMAL INTERPRETATION ON | | 13-404.ABCD.1 | | | | 13) 1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS IN WIND-BORNE | | DEBRIS REGIONS, EXTERIOR GLAZING THAT RECEIVES POSITIVE | | PRESSURE IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 M) IN BUILDINGS | | SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE OPENINGS AND THE BALANCE OF | | GLAZED OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE | | ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH GLAZING THAT RECEIVES | | POSITIVE PRESSURE IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR PROTECTED WITH | | AN IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS | | OF SSTD 12, ASTM E 1886 AND ASTM E 1996, OR MIAMI-DADE | | TAS 201, 202 AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN AS FOLLOWS: 1. | | GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 FEET (9.1 M) OF GRADE | | SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LARGE MISSILE TEST. | | 2. GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED MORE THAN 30 FEET (9.1 M) | | ABOVE GRADE SHALL MEET THE PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL | | MISSILE TEST. | | | | FL BLD CODE 1609.6.2.2 COMPONENTS & CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 | | COPIES OF PRODUCT TESTING REPORTS, MISSING REPORTS ARE | | AS FOLLOWS: | | 13A) FIXED WINDOWS/STOREFRONT | | 13B) EXTERIOR GLAZED DOORS | | 13C) EXTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS | | 13D) METAL WALL PANELS | | 13E) WALL LOUVERS | | 13F) SOFFIT MATERIALS | | 13G) ROOFING SYSTEMS | | | | THE DESIGNER OF RECORD HAS ISSUED A LETTER WITH THE | | LISTED PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR THE BUILDING, THE | | CONTRACTOR WILL STILL NEED TO SUBMIT 2 COPIES OT HTE | | FULL REPORT FOR VARIFICATION OF PRESSURES, EXCEPTIONS, | | AND LIMITATIONS WITH IN EACH REPORT. EVEN THOUGH SOME | | REPORTS ARE LISTED UNDER THE 2004 FBC WEBSITE, THEY MAY | | BE OLDER NOA'S UNDERTHE 2001 FBC WHERE 1 1/3RD STEEL | | INCREASES WERE TAKEN ON | | FASTENERS. | | | | 14) S-1A FOUNDATION NOTE# 1 INDICATES ELEVATION 100'-0" | | IS XX.XX' NGVD, PLEASE FILL IN THE UNKNOWNS. FLOOD ZONE | | A5, MINIMUM FLOOR ELEVATION OF 7.5 NGVD. CITY CODE OF | | ORDINANCES. | | | | 15) SHEET S-3 INDICATES THE DESIGN TO THE 2004 FBCBASE | | CODE WITH 2006 SUPPLEMENTS, UPDATE TO 2007 SUPPLEMENTS. | | | | A THOROUGH REVIEW CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A | | RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF | | THIS REVIEW. | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-09-30 |
Time |
14:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-09-30 |
Time |
14:02 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-03-26 |
Time |
11:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-03-26 |
Time |
09:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-02-17 |
Time |
16:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-02-10 |
Time |
12:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-02-17 15:12:36 | | | THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES: | | | | THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2007 REVISIONS, 2005 | | NEC, NFPA-72 2002, NFPA-101 2006, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, | | CHAPTER 1.AND FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | THIS COMMENT WAS FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW | | | | 17} PER 13-415.2.ABC.1.1. PAGE #2 OF THE ENERGY GAUGE | | INPUT DATA REPORT, DOES NOT INDICATE THE CORRECT NUMBER | | OF FIXTURES AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE WATTAGES PER | | LUMINAIRE ARE INCORRECT, AND THE CONTROL TYPE MUST BE | | PER 13-415.1ABC.1.2. NO LIGHTING POWER DENSITIES PER | | 13-415, INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR WERE GIVEN. COMPLY WITH | | CHAPTER 13 FBC.***THE EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR WATTAGES | | AND COUNTS DO NOT CORRELATE WITH THE LIGHTING FIXTURE | | SCHEDULE ON SHEET VC E-11.0. | | | | NEW COMMENT, SHEET VC E-5.0 | | | | 1} THE NOTE REGARDING THE FIXTURES TO BE DETERMINED AT | | A LATER DATE IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. A SYSTEM MUST BE SHOWN | | THAT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CODE. IT MAY BE | | REVISED AT A LATTER DATE. ALSO SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1.2 -3. | | THE WATTAGE OF LINE-VOLTAGE LIGHTING TRACK AND PLUG-IN | | BUSWAY THAT ALLOW THE ADDITION AND/OR RELOCATION OF | | LUMINAIRES WITHOUT ALTERING THE WIRING OF THE SYSTEM | | SHALL BE THE SPECIFIED WATTAGE OF THE LUMINARIES | | INCLUDED IN THE SYSTEM WITH A MINIMUM OF 30 WATTS PER | | LINEAR FOOT. | | | | 2} SHEET VC E-10.0 AND AC-1 LOCATE THE AHU'S IN | | DIFFERENT SPACES IN THE ELECTRICAL ROOM. CORRELATE THE | | SHEETS AND SEE 110.26(F)(1)(B) 2005 NEC FOR FOREIGN | | SYSTEMS IN DEDICATED SPACE. | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561/805-6718 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-01-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-01-12 |
Time |
16:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-01-09 |
Time |
11:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-01-12 16:52:59 | | | | | APPLICATION #08120369 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW | | 100 CLEMATIS STREET 1/9/09 | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL. | | | | THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES: | | | | THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2007 REVISIONS, 2005 | | NEC, NFPA-72 2002, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, CHAPTER 1, AND | | FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | | 1} SHEET E-1.0 GENERAL NOTE (1) DOES NOT INDICATE THE | | CODE CYCLE GOVERNING THIS PROJECT. PLEASE NOTE THE 2005 | | NEC. 106.1.3 FBC. | | | | 2} INDICATE THE KW RATING OF TRANSFORMER ?T2? ON SHEET | | E-3.0 | | | | 3} THIS BUILDING IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE A-5. SHEET | | C12 SHOWS THE ELEVATION FOR THE ELECTRICAL ROOM @5? 6?. | | | | 4} SHEET E-3.0 NOTE #2 INCORRECTLY REFERS TO SHEET | | E-9.0 FOR ELECTRICAL ROOM LAYOUT. THE ELECTRICAL ROOM | | LAYOUT IS MORE CLEARLY SHOWN ON SHEET E-11.0. | | | | 5} THE 200 AMP OCP FOR THE PRIMARY PROTECTION IS NOT IN | | COMPLIANCE WITH 450.3(B), NOTE #1, 450.4 AND 240.6. 175 | | MAX. SHEET E-3.0 | | | | 6} BY ROUTING THE TRANSFORMER ?T-CP? SECONDARY | | CONDUCTORS INTO A WIREWAY AND THEM TAPPING THEM BEYOND | | THE TRANSFORMER TAP THOSE CONDUCTORS ARE IN VIOLATION | | OF 240.21(B)(1 THROUGH 5) WHICH REQUIRE THE SECONDARY | | CONDUCTORS TO TERMINATE IN A SINGLE CIRCUIT BREAKER OR | | SET OF FUSES.A DISCONNECT WITH OVERCURRENT PROTECTION | | MAY BE ADDED AHEAD OF THE PANELS OR THE TRANSFORMER | | COULD BE TRIPLE LUGGED AND SEPARATE CONDUITS RAN | | DIRECTLY TO THE PANELS AND THE CONDUCTORS TERMINATING | | AT THE MAINS OF THE PANELS. | | | | 7} THE GROUND RAN FROM FPL TRANSFORMER ?T2? TO SEVICE | | #1 AND SERVICE #2 IS NONCOMPLIANT WITH 250.6(A) AND | | CREATES A PARALLEL PATH WITH THE GROUNDED (NEUTRAL) | | CONDUCTOR. SEE 250.24(B) AND (C). | | | | 8} SHEET E-4.0 NOTE #2 INCORRECTLY REFERENCES SHEET | | E-8.0 AS DETAILS FOR THE BUILDING AND FOUNTAIN. SHEET | | E-8.0 IS A GROUNDING DETAIL. 106.1.3 FBC AS AMENDED. | | | | 9} SHEET E-7.0 HAS TWO HAND DRYER CIRCUITS LABELED | | L1-21, L1-26 ON THE PANEL SCHEDULE. 408.4 NEC. | | | | 10} THE BATH RECEPTACLES MUST BE GFI PER 210.8(B)(1) | | SHEET E-7.0 | | | | 11} SHEET E-6.0 DOES NOT HAVE THE PANEL DESIGNATION OR | | CIRCUIT NUMBERS FOR THE RESTROOM LIGHTING. 408.4 NEC. | | | | 12} PROVIDE MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS FOR VOLTAGE | | AND OVERCURRENT PROTECTION FOR THE AIR HANDLERS ON THE | | ?AC? SHEETS. 408.4 NEC. | | | | 13} SHEET E-8.0 GROUNDING. ALL THE GROUNDS SHOWING | | BEING RUN TO THE GROUND RING MUST BE CONNECTED TO THE | | METAL ENCLOSURE OR THE GROUND BARS IN THE EQUIPMENT. | | THE NEUTRALS MUST BE ISOLATED FROM THE EQUIPMENT | | GROUNDS IN ALL PANELS EXCEPT ?SWBD-VC? AND THE 70 AMP | | DISCONNECT SERVICE SWITCH #2. SEE NOTE #7. | | | | 14} SHEET E-10.0 RECEPTACLES MUST BE GFI PER | | 210.8(B)(4) OUTDOORS IN PUBLIC SPACES?FOR THE PURPOSE | | OF THIS SECTION A PUBLIC SPACE IS DEFINED AS ANY SPACE | | THAT IS FOR USE BY, OR IS ACCESSIBLE TO, THE PUBLIC. | | | | 15} SHEET E-10.0 ?SWBD-VC? IS SHOWN IN THE EXISTING | | FOUNTAIN EQUIPMENT ROOM. SHEET E-11 LOCATES THAT | | SERVICE EQUIPMENT IN THE ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT ROOM. | | CORRELATE SAME. | | | | 16} NOTES #1 AND #2 ARE INCORRECT, SHEET E-10.0 | | REFERENCING ?ROOM LAYOUT ? AND ?PANEL SCHEDULES?. | | | | 17} PER 13-415.2.ABC.1.1. PAGE #2 OF THE ENERGY GAUGE | | INPUT DATA REPORT, DOES NOT INDICATE THE CORRECT NUMBER | | OF FIXTURES AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE WATTAGES PER | | LUMINAIRE ARE INCORRECT, AND THE CONTROL TYPE MUST BE | | PER 13-415.1ABC.1.2. NO LIGHTING POWER DENSITIES PER | | 13-415, INTERIOR OR EXTERIOR WERE GIVEN. COMPLY WITH | | CHAPTER 13 FBC. | | | | 18} THE CONDENSING UNITS ALSO MUST BE ABOVE THE BASE | | FLOOD ELEVATION. | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561/805-6718 | | [email protected] | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2009-03-03 |
Time |
14:41 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2009-03-03 |
Time |
14:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-03-03 14:42:25 | *** APPROVED *** | | | | CIVIL SETS ACCEPTABLE. SHEET C-15 REMOVE LARGE METER | | DETAIL. CREATES CONFUSSION. | | [email protected] (561) 494-1085 |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-01-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dlauderm |
Date |
2009-01-20 |
Time |
14:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dlauderm |
Date |
2009-01-20 |
Time |
14:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-01-20 14:08:45 | FAILED. | | 1) CIVIL PLAN SHOULD HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED | | FIRST THRU: ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT, 1000 - | | 45TH STREET, SUITE 15, WEST PALM BEACH FL 33407. PLEASE | | SUBMIT UPDATED PLANS WITH WRITTEN EXPLANATION OF | | COMMENTS. WHEN CONTACTING THE REVIEWER PLEASE REFERENCE | | THE PERMIT NUMBER. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE | | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT THE REVIEWER: DEAN S. LAUDERMILK, | | PROJECT COORDINATOR. | | | | 2) POLLUTION CONTROL PLAN IS MISSING, PLEASE SUPPLY | | PLAN FOR ALL AREAS TO BE EXCAVATED AND THE SURROUNDING | | CATCH BASINS. ONLY SOME DETAILS ARE SHOWN ON SHEET C9. | | | | 3) SHEET C2: | | 3A) I AM CONFUSED AS TO WHAT IS PHASE 1A AND PHASE 1B. | | THIS SHEET SHOWS THE LARGE AREA TO BE 1A, C3 SHOWS IT | | AS 1B, WHILE C4 SHOWS THE LARGE AREA TO AGAIN BE 1A AND | | THE SMALL 2/3 BUILDING AREA TO BE 1A. PLEASE CORRECT | | THE DRAWINGS AND SUBMIT AN EXPLANATION OF THE PHASING | | AND WHAT IS TO TAKE PLACE. AS YOU WILL READ IN LATER | | COMMENTS IT IS CONFUSING WHEN THE DIFFERENT PHASES WILL | | TAKE PLACE AND WHAT THEY INVOLVE. | | 3B) NOT ALL OF THE REVIEWING STAFF UNDERSTANDS THAT THE | | FIRST FLOOR DOORS TO THE LIBRARY ARE IN LINE WITH THE | | DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION. SO, AT SOME TIME, FOR | | SOMETIME, THE DOORS TO THE GROUND FLOOR OF THE LIBRARY | | WILL BE COMPLETELY BLOCKED. PLEASE SHOW THE DOORS AND | | EXPLAIN HOW ACCESS WILL BE MAINTAINED. | | 3C) THIS PLAN SHOWS THE REMOVAL OF THE CATCH BASIN AND | | THE PIPING TO THE CATCH BASIN TO THE EAST. PLEASE | | EXPLAIN OR SHOW HOW THIS AREA THAT NORMALLY FLOODS WILL | | BE PROTECTED FROM FLOODING WHILE THE LIBRARY REMAINS | | OPEN. THE FLOOR OF THE LIBRARY IS THE LOWEST POINT IN | | THE AREA (4.8"+- PER SHEET C4). | | 3D) SHOULDN'T THE LIMITS OF THE DEMOLITION ALSO INCLUDE | | THE AREA TO THE EAST TO THE EXISTING CATCH BASIN, SINCE | | THE STORM SEWER IS TO BE REMOVED TO THE EAST TO THE | | NEXT CATCH BASIN? | | 3E) DURING LOW TIDE YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE IS A LARGE | | PIPE (PERHAPS 24") MUDDED UP GOING NORTH FROM THE | | EXISTING CATCH BASIN TO BE REMOVED, NOTE IT ON THE PLAN | | THAT THERE MAY STILL BE PIPE IN THE GROUND TO THE NORTH | | THAT NEEDS TO BE REMOVED. | | 3F) THE PLAN SHOWS THE REMOVAL OF THE DRIVEWAY SOUTH OF | | THE SIDEWALK, THIS CONCRETE AREA HAS 3 DUMPSTERS ON IT | | AND IS SIGNED; "PERMIT PARKING FOR THE LIBRARY". PLEASE | | EXPLAIN WHERE THE DUMPSTERS ARE TO BE RELOCATED TO | | DURING THE TIME THE LIBRARY IS OPEN AND WHERE THE | | LIBRARY STAFF WILL PARK (THERE WERE TWO CARS IN THIS | | SPACE TODAY, 1-20-09) AND ONE OF THEM WAS FOR AN ADA | | EMPLOYEE). | | 3G) REMOVE NOTE ON ALL PLAN SHEETS (EAST OF FP&L | | MANHOLE) "CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY W.M. SIZE AND | | LOCATION PRIOR TO ORDERING TAP". THE REASON IS | | EXPLAINED ON C12. | | | | 4) SHEET C3: | | 4A) NOTES ARE INCORRECT, REMOVE NOTES ON ALL APPLICABLE | | PLAN SHEETS AND REVIEW REASONS UNDER SHEET C12: | | 4A.1) UNDER NOTE FOR EXISTING WATER SERVICE "TO BE | | CONSTRUCTED DURING PHASE 1A". ALSO REMOVE THE ARROW. | | 4A.2) UNDER NOTE FOR EXISTING SANITARY SERVICE "TO BE | | CONSTRUCTED DURING PHASE 1A". ALSO REMOVE THE ARROW. | | 4B) ADD NOTE "PROTECT EXISTING WATER SERVICE FROM | | EXISTING METER TO THE BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, AND THEN | | INTO THE LIBRARY." WATER METER SERVING BUILDING IS OUT | | BY THE LIGHT POLE WEST OF SITE, NOT PICKED UP BY | | SURVEYOR. | | 4C) ADD NOTE "PROTECT EXISTING WATER SERVICE FROM | | EXISTING METER TO THE BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, AND THEN | | INTO THE EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM." SECOND WATER | | METER SERVING IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OUT BY THE LIGHT | | POLE WEST OF SITE, NOT PICKED UP BY SURVEYOR. | | 4D) ADD NOTE: "PROTECT EXISTING SANITARY SEWER | | SERVICE." EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CROSSES THRU | | THE SITE FROM THE MANHOLE OUT IN THE STREET THRU THE | | CLEAN-OUT IN THE STREET TO THE LIBRARY CLEAN-OUT AT THE | | ENTRANCE DOOR. | | | | 5) SHEET C4: | | 5A) THE LAY-OUT OF THE RAMPS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL DO NOT | | MATCH THE DESIGN SHOWN ON A-1.1. PLEASE CORRECT ONE OR | | BOTH DRAWINGS. I AM ASSUMING THAT A-1.1 IS CORRECT, | | WHICH WILL STILL NOT WORK. | | 5B) THERE IS NOT ENOUGH ROOM ON THE LANDING IN FRONT OF | | THE BATHROOM DOORS (THIS SHEET SHOWS IT AS A RAMP), FOR | | THE DOORS TO OPEN OUT FROM THE BATHROOMS AND SOMEONE | | WILL NOT BE ABLE TO GET BY IN A WHEEL CHAIR. PLEASE | | CORRECT. | | 5C) THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY CAN NOT BE UTILIZED. | | 5C.1) EXPLAIN WHY THE DRIVEWAY IS REQUIRED, THERE IS | | MORE THAN ENOUGH SPACE FOR ON STREET PARKING. | | 5C.2) AS LAID OUT, IF A TRUCK BACKS INTO THIS SPACE IT | | WILL RUN INTO THE BUILDING. | | | | 6) SHEET C5: | | 6A) EXPLAIN HOW LONG THE BATHROOMS (AND THE FOUNTAIN) | | WILL BE OUT OF SERVICE SINCE THE WOOD PLATFORM WILL | | NEED TO BE REMOVED AND THE CONCRETE RAMP AND PLATFORM | | BE BUILT? | | | | 7) SHEET C6: | | 7A) NONE OF THE DETAILS FOR STORMWATER ON THIS SHEET | | WILL BE BUILT. REMOVE IT. | | | | 8) SHEET C7: | | 8A) NONE OF THE DETAILS FOR STORMWATER ON THIS SHEET | | WILL BE BUILT. REMOVE IT. | | | | 9) SHEET C8: | | 9A) NONE OF THE DETAILS FOR STORMWATER ON THIS SHEET | | WILL BE BUILT. REMOVE IT. | | | | 10) SHEET C9: | | 10A) NO DETAILS FOR PROTECTING CATCH BASINS ARE SHOWN | | ON THIS SHEET, PLEASE ADD MORE POLLUTION CONTROL | | DETAILS. | | | | 11) SHEET C12: | | 12A) THERE IS NO NEED FOR A 4" TAP TO SERVE A 5/8" | | WATER METER. TAKE IT OFF THE PLAN. INSTEAD SHOW TYING | | INTO THE BACK OF THE EXISTING 2" WATER SERVICE TO THE | | LIBRARY AND SERVING THE BUILDING THRU THAT LINE. THE | | SURVEYOR DID NOT PICK IT UP BUT THERE IS A 2" METER BOX | | NEXT TO THE LIGHT POLE AT THE CURB, USE IT. ALSO SHOW | | ABANDONING THE REST OF THE PIPE INTO THE LIBRARY WHEN | | IT IS DEMOLISHED. | | | | 12B) THERE IS NO NEED FOR A NEW SANITARY SEWER LATERAL, | | THERE IS AN EXISTING 6" SANITARY SEWER LATERAL THAT | | COMES FROM THE MANHOLE IN THE STREET THRU THE CLEAN-OUT | | IN THE STREET (SHOWN ON THE PLAN) TO THE LIBRARY. THERE | | IS AN EXISTING CLEAN-OUT JUST OUTSIDE THE DOOR TO THE | | LIBRARY. SHOW CUTTING A "WYE" INTO THE LINE TO SERVE | | THE NEW BUILDING AND SHOW ABANDONING THE REST OF THE | | PIPE INTO THE LIBRARY WHEN IT IS DEMOLISHED. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-04-02 |
Time |
11:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-04-02 |
Time |
11:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-04-02 11:57:28 | *****APPROVED***** | | | | ALL COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE PLAN REVIEWS HAVE | | BEEN ADDRESSED; DRAWING # 08096Z01, PLAN SHEETS LS-1.0, | | A-2.0, A-5.0, AND E-5.0 WERE STAMPED, INITIALED, AND | | DATED. | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-03-06 |
Time |
15:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-03-06 |
Time |
14:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-03-06 15:03:35 | *****UNSAT***** | | | | | | THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEETS TO BE FIRE STAMPED WHEN THE | | FOLLOWING TWO COMMENTS (OF THE PREVIOUS SEVEN) AS WELL | | AS THE OTHER PLAN EXAMINER'S COMMENTS HAVE BEEN | | ADDRESSED: | | | | 3. DISPLAY/SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE FIRE HYDRANTS | | WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SITE. COULD NOT LOCATE THIS | | HYDRANT AS PER YOUR RESPONSE LETTER | | | | 5. IN ADDITION TO ELECTRONIC SWITCHES ON THE DOUBLE | | CHECK DETECTOR ASSEMBLY AS SHOWN ON PAGE C15, THE | | BACKFLOW DEVICE SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A CHAIN AND | | LOCK. COULD NOT LOCATE THIS COMMENT AS PER YOUR | | RESPONSE LETTER | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-01-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-01-26 |
Time |
15:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-01-26 |
Time |
14:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-01-26 15:21:40 | *****DENIED***** | | | | | | 1. ON SHEET LS-1.0, AMEND AND/OR INCLUDE IN THE | | BUIULDING CODE ANALYSIS - FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE | | (2007 EDITION) WHICH IS BASED ON NFPA 1, UNIFORM FIRE | | CODE, 2006 EDITION AND NFPA 101, LIFE SAFETY CODE, 2006 | | EDITION | | | | 2. THE SCOPE OF WORK SHALL NOT HINDER OR INTEREFERE | | WITH EMERGENCY ACCESS TO THE SITE OR THE VICINITY | | THEREOF (INCLUDING STREETS, ALLEYS, FIRE LANES, ETC.) . | | | | 3. DISPLAY/SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE FIRE HYDRANTS | | WITHIN 500 FEET OF THE SITE. | | | | 4. THE NUMERICAL ADDRESS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE TITLE | | BLOCK OF EACH SUBMITTED PLAN SHEET. | | | | 5. IN ADDITION TO ELECTRONIC SWITCHES ON THE DOUBLE | | CHECK DETECTOR ASSEMBLY AS SHOWN ON PAGE C15, THE | | BACKFLOW DEVICE SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A CHAIN AND | | LOCK. | | | | 6. ON SHEET LS-1.0, SMOKE DETECTORS (SD) ARE SHOWN ON | | THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN. BE REMINDED THAT SMOKE DETECTORS | | ARE TIED INTO A FIRE ALARM SYSTEM WHEREAS SMOKE ALARMS | | (SA) ONLY SOUND WITHIN WITHIN AN AREA AND SHALL NOT | | ACTUATE THE BUILDING FIRE ALARM SYSTEM. PLEASE VERIFY. | | | | 7. ON THE APPROPIATE EXTERIOR ELEVATION, SHOW/DISPALY | | THE NUMERICAL ADDRESS FOR THIS SITE. AS PER WEST PALM | | BEACH CODE, THE NUMBERS SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 6" IN | | HEIGHT AND NO LESS THAN 1 " IN WIDTH. | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER INDICATING HOW/WHERE EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
|
Date |
2009-09-08 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-09-08 |
Time |
10:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-09-08 10:39:53 | 9-08-09 REVISION TO C-23 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2009-05-12 |
Time |
16:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-05-12 16:50:43 | SENT TO JIM WITMER |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-03-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-03-12 |
Time |
16:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-03-12 |
Time |
16:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-03-12 16:27:18 | TO "C38"--EXPEDITED |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-02-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-04 |
Time |
10:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-04 |
Time |
10:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-02-04 10:25:32 | TO "COMM" BD#26--PLANS ON RACK-3 ROLLS AND 2 BINDERS |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-01-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-01-26 |
Time |
15:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-12-18 |
Time |
09:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-12-18 09:06:12 | TO "COMM" BD#59 |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-10-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-10-08 |
Time |
15:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-10-08 |
Time |
15:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-10-08 15:14:30 | REVISED AC-1 DELTA 3 |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-09-16 |
Time |
16:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-09-15 |
Time |
17:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-09-16 16:18:25 | REVISED AC-1, AC-3 DELTA 2 | | REDLINED NOTES ON PLANS BASED ON CONVERSATION WITH JACK | | MITCHELL, EOR. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-03-30 |
Time |
16:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-03-30 |
Time |
15:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-03-30 16:25:55 | ****PROVISO**** | | ALL OUTDOOR MECHANICAL APPLIANCES SHALL BE DESIGNED AND | | INSTALLED FOR WIND RESISTANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC-M | | 301.13. COMPLIANCE IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO FINAL | | MECHANICAL INSPECTION. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | 561.805.6719 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-02-21 |
Time |
12:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-02-21 |
Time |
12:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-02-21 12:26:38 | REVIEW #: 2ND | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | **PREVIOUS COMMENT** | | 1. PROVIDE COMPLETE SUBMITTALS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR | | LOUVERS TO BE USED ON THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING | | INSTALLATION DETAILS. ENSURE PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE | | CURRENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAC RULE 9B-72. PRODUCT | | APPROVALS ARE TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER | | OF RECORD IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 106.3.3. | | **PARTIALLY ADDRESSED** | | PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED FOR | | REVIEW AND MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER | | OF RECORD FOR THIS PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC-B | | SECTION 106.3.3. THIS IS GENERALLY ACCOMPLISHED BY | | PROVIDING A SHOP DRAWING REVIEW STAMP ON THE PRODUCT | | APPROVAL DOCUMENTATION. THIS DOCUMENTATION IS ALSO | | REQUIRED IN THE FIELD FOR INSPECTION TO ENSURE PRODUCTS | | ARE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED | | INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. | | | | 2. OK | | | | 3. OK. PLENUM CLOSET HAS BEEN ELIMINATED. | | | | 4. OK. A BACKDRAFT DAMPER HAS BEEN SHOWN ON PLANS. | | | | **PREVIOUS COMMENT** | | 5. FOR OUTDOOR CONDENSING UNITS: APPLIANCES AND | | SUPPORTS THAT ARE EXPOSED TO WIND SHALL BE DESIGNED AND | | INSTALLED TO RESIST THE WIND PRESSURES ON THE EQUIPMENT | | AND THE SUPPORTS AS DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM | | 301.13. PROVIDE MANUFACTURERS DATA SHOWING THESE | | CONDENSING UNITS DESIGNED FOR WIND RESISTANCE. | | **PARTIALLY ADDRESSED** | | DESIGNER INDICATES IN WRITTEN RESPONSE THAT NO | | INFORMATION COULD BE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLIANCE | | MANUFACTURER REGARDING DESIGN FOR WIND RESISTANCE. IN | | LIEU OF SUCH DATA, THE FOLLOWING METHODS OF | | DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE WITH FBC-M 301.13: | | | | A) PROVIDE A RATIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF | | THE APPLIANCES, SHOWING THEY ARE CAPABLE OF RESISTING | | THE ANTICIPATED WIND PRESSURES. | | | | B) ENCLOSE THE APPLIANCES IN A STRUCTURE DESIGNED FOR | | WIND RESISTANCE WHICH WILL PROVIDE ADEQUATE AIRFLOW FOR | | APPLIANCE OPERATION AS WELL AS SUFFICIENT ACCES FOR | | SERVICE AND REPLACEMENT. | | | | C) SITE INSTALLED REINFORCEMENT OF THE APPLIANCES, AS | | PROPOSED BY STRUCTURAL DETAIL ON PAGE S-5 MUST BE | | DESIGNED FOR THE SPECIFIC PROPOSED APPLIANCES AND | | SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR | | APPROVAL UNDER THE ALTERNATE MATERIALS AND METHODS | | PROVISIONS OF FBC-B 104.11. PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CALL | | AND DISCUSS THESE OPTIONS PRIOR TO RESUBMISSION OF | | PLANS. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE SEE FLORIDA | | BUILDING COMMISSION DECLARATORY STATEMENT DCA08-DEC205. | | | | 6. OK | | | | 7 THROUGH 9: OK. PLENUM CLOSET HAS BEEN ELIMINATED. | | | | NOTE: AT THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL OR CONTRACTOR???S | | REQUEST, WIND RESISTANCE FOR MECHANICAL APPLIANCES MAY | | BE COVERED WITH A PROVISO TO ALLOW PERMIT ISSUANCE | | WHILE A MEANS OF COMPLIANCE IS BEING DETERMINED. PLEASE | | RELAY SUCH A REQUEST AT TIME OF RESUBMISSION OF PLANS. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | 561.805.6719 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-01-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-01-24 |
Time |
16:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-01-24 |
Time |
16:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-01-24 16:58:46 | REVIEW #: 1ST | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | 1. PROVIDE COMPLETE SUBMITTALS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR | | LOUVERS TO BE USED ON THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING | | INSTALLATION DETAILS. ENSURE PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE | | CURRENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAC RULE 9B-72. PRODUCT | | APPROVALS ARE TO BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER | | OF RECORD IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 106.3.3. | | | | 2. NOTE #13 ON AC-1 CALLS FOR CONDENSATE TO DISCHARGE | | IN PLANTERS. CONDENSATE LINES SHALL DISCHARGE AT LEAST | | 1 FOOT AWAY FROM THE STRUCTURE SIDEWALL IN ACCORDANCE | | WITH FBCB 1503.6. | | | | 3. ARCHITECTURAL DOOR SCHEDULE CALLS FOR MECHANICAL | | ROOM 105 DOOR TO BE ???FRP.??? DOES THIS REPRESENT | | FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PLASTIC? MATERIALS EXPOSED WITHIN | | PLENUMS SHALL BE NONCOMBUSTIBLE OR SHALL HAVE A FLAME | | SPREAD INDEX OF NOT MORE THAN 25 AND A SMOKE-DEVELOPED | | INDEX OF NOT MORE THAN 50 WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE | | WITH ASTM E 84 PER FBCM 602.2.1. PROVIDE A | | NONCOMBUSTIBLE DOOR AT THIS LOCATION OR PROVIDE ASTM | | E84 DATA FOR THE SPECIFIED DOOR. | | | | 4. PROVIDE SHUTOFF DAMPER CONTROLS FOR THE AHU1 OUTSIDE | | AIR INTAKE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 13-409.1.ABC.3.3. | | | | 5. FOR OUTDOOR CONDENSING UNITS: APPLIANCES AND | | SUPPORTS THAT ARE EXPOSED TO WIND SHALL BE DESIGNED AND | | INSTALLED TO RESIST THE WIND PRESSURES ON THE EQUIPMENT | | AND THE SUPPORTS AS DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM | | 301.13. PROVIDE MANUFACTURERS DATA SHOWING THESE | | CONDENSING UNITS DESIGNED FOR WIND RESISTANCE. | | | | 6. PROVIDE CONFIRMATION THAT THE CONDENSING UNITS ARE | | TO BE INSTALLED ABOVE BASE FLOOD ELEVATION IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 301.14. | | | | 7. PROVIDE ADEQUATE DOCUMENTATION FOR ROOFING SYSTEM TO | | BE USED, CONFIRMING THAT MINIMUM R-20 INSULATION SHALL | | BE PROVIDED ABOVE MECHANICAL ROOM 105 AS REQUIRED BY | | THE MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS. | | NOTE: MINIMUM R-19 IS REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB | | 13-404.1.ABC.2. | | | | 8. SHOW HOW WALLS OF MECHANICAL ROOM 105 ARE TO BE | | FINISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 603.8 AND 603.9. | | | | 9. ALTHOUGH THE DOOR SCHEDULE CALLS FOR GASKETED FRAME | | AND THRESHOLD, IT IS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED THAT A DUCTED | | RETURN AND OUTSIDE AIR BE PROVIDED IN MECHANICAL ROOM | | 105 TO AVOID ANY INCIDENTAL RECIRCULATION OF AIR FROM | | THE MENS RESTROOM AREA INTO THE CONDITIONED VISITOR | | CENTER AREAS. THIS CHANGE WOULD ALSO NEGATE SOME OF THE | | REVIEW COMMENTS LISTED ABOVE. RECIRCULATION OF AIR FROM | | THIS AREA IS PROHIBITED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM | | 403.2.1. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | 561.805.6719 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-02-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-02-25 |
Time |
16:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-02-25 |
Time |
16:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-02-25 16:43:29 | PASSED PROVISO -- WATER RISER DIAGRAM SHT P-2 & | | PLUMBING SPECIFICATION NOTE 8 AIR CHAMBERS ARE NOT | | APPROVED. SECTION 604.9 & PDI-WH 201. |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-01-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-01-12 |
Time |
10:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-01-12 |
Time |
10:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-01-12 11:23:23 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: | | FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | 1. SHT IR-1 THE CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER IS | | REQUIRED IN THE TITLE BLOCK FOR THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT | | BUSINESS AND THE ARCHITECTS LA NUMBER IS INCORRECT IN | | THE TITLE BLOCK. (ON PLANS LA000907, BUT ON THE FLORIDA | | STATE DBPR WEBSITE IT IS LISTED AS LA0000907). FAC | | 61G1-16.004 & FS 481.306. PLEASE SHOW CORRECT NUMBERS | | ON TITLE BLOCK. (SEE ATTACHED SHEETS FROM FLA DBPR | | WEBSITE). | | | | 2. SHT IR-1 SHOWS NO PIPING. THE CONTROLLER, BACKFLOW, | | & RAIN SENSOR ARE NOT SHOWN AS WELL. PLEASE INDICATE | | THE LOCATION OF THE CONTROLLER, BACKFLOW, & RAIN SENSOR | | . INDICATE IF THE ITEM IS EXISTING OR TO BE INSTALLED | | IN PHASE I. SECTIONS 106.1.1, 608 AND APPENDIX F | | SUBSECTION J AS WELL AS FS 373.62. | | | | 3. SHT VC A-1.0 ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE FOR ROOMS 102 & | | 103. INDICATE HOW THE WALLS WITHIN 2 FEET OF THE W/C'S | | AND URINAL SHALL BE NONABSORBENT UP TO 4 FEET ABOVE THE | | FLOOR AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 1210.2. | | | | 4. SHT VC A-3.0 SUBMIT A DETAIL FOR THE WEST SIDE | | (LEFT) OF THE ROOF TITLED "SECONDARY DRAINAGE OVERFLOW | | SCUPPER IN FLASHING". THERE IS NO DOWNSPOUT OR GUTTER | | INDICATED AND THE RWL DETAIL 1/VC-A-3.0 IS ONLY SHOWN | | ON THE EAST SIDE (RIGHT) OF THE BUILDING. PLEASE | | CLARIFY IF THIS IS THE PRIMARY DRAIN AND WHERE THE RAIN | | WATER FROM THIS DRAIN WILL TERMINATE. SECTIONS 106.1.1, | | 106.1.2 &1106 AS WELL AS TABLES 1106.3 & 1106.6. | | | | 5. SHT A-6.0 SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | ___W/C: | | A. 11-4.16.5 FLUSH CONTROLS | | ___URINAL: | | A. 11-4.18.4 FLUSH CONTROLS | | ___LAV | | A. 11-4.19.5 FAUCETS | | | | 6. ALL A/C & PLUMBING SHEETS. THE SEAL HAS NOT | | IMPRESSED ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED. THE STATE OF | | FLORIDA IS NOT INDICATED ON ANY SHEET. PLEASE RESEAL TO | | IMPRESS ALL INFORMATION REQUIRED. FAC 61G1-23.001 & FS | | 471.025. | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-02-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2009-02-26 |
Time |
08:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2009-02-26 |
Time |
08:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-02-26 08:31:59 | ZONING REVIEW: PASSED | | | | ** ALL FINISHES SHALL BE REVIEW AND CONFIRMED BY DESIGN | | TEAM | | | | MATT FLIS - 822-1445 |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2008-12-26 |
Time |
11:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2008-12-26 |
Time |
11:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-12-26 11:28:23 | ZONING REVIEW: FAILED | | | | 1) MATERIAL AND COLOR SELECTIONS TO BE CONFIRMED BY | | J.GOLDBERG. PLANS INDICATED EXPOSED CMU WHICH WAS | | DISCUSSED TO BE STUCCO-COVERED. | | 2) CONFIRM LOCATIONS OF ALL BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, FIRE | | CONNECTIONS SO THEY MAY BE LOCATED AWAY FROM | | CIRCULATION OR PRIMARY BUILDING ELEVATIONS (SOUTH | | ELEV). | | 3) ON LP-1, CONFIRM ALL PLANTS LISTED ARE TO BE USED. | | COULD NOT FIND SOT ON PLAN. IS THIS SUPPOSED TO BE SPT? | | 4) ON IR-1, CONFIRM IRRIGATION LINES WILL BE INSTALLED. | | IT IS NOT CLEAR FROM THIS DRAWING OR THE NOTES WHAT | | WILL HAPPEN WITH PRELIM PHASES (LINES SHOULD BE IN | | PLACE FOR PLANTERS). | | 5) A 1/A-1.0 - ACCESS RAMP SECTION. CABLE RAILING IS | | INDICATED ON SOUTHERN SIDE OF RAMP UP. DO WE NEED THIS | | AT ALL? PLANTER PROVIDES BARRIER AND HANDRAIL IS | | PROVIDED ON NORTH SIDE, SO CABLING SHOULD NOT BE | | NECESSARY. CAN WE ELIMINATE THE CABLING AND HANDRAIL? | | IF NOT, JUST INSTALL HANDRAIL. | | 6) A-1.1 - DURING TEMPORARY ACCESS PHASE, IT DOES NOT | | APPEAR THAT THERE WILL BE ENOUGH WHEELCHAIR MANEUVERING | | CLEARANCE WHEN BATHROOM DOORS ARE OPEN. ACCESS AREA IS | | OVER 5' WIDE, DOORS WILL BLOCK WHEN OPEN. PLEASE | | CONFIRM THIS MEETS ADA REQUIREMENTS. | | 7) ON A-1.1, SCHEMATIC DRAWINGS SHOWED BATHROOM | | ENTRANCES RECESSED SO THAT THEY WOULD NOT BE DIRECTLY | | VIEWED FROM EXTERIOR. PLANS SHOW DOORS OPENING DIRECTLY | | TO THE OUTSIDE. CAN THE PLANS BE REVISED TO SHOW | | ORIGINAL SCHEMATIC DESIGN, WITH SOME MODIFICATION? THIS | | CREATES A BETTER SOUTH BUILDING ELEVATION. | | 8) ON CABLE RAIL DETAILS, RAIL SYSTEM SHOULD NEVER | | TERMINATE INTO BUILDING ELEVATION. IT SHOULD ALWAYS | | TERMINATE INTO VERTICAL STEEL SUPPORT WITH TIE-OFF. | | DETAILS SEEM TO SHOW THIS, BUT JUST CONFIRM. | | 9) A-5.0 - ALUM DOWNSPOUT INDICATED WITH HORIZONTAL | | STRUTS CONNECTING TO MAIN BUILDING. WHAT IS THE DETAIL | | FOR THE CONNECTION TO THE BUILDING? CONFIRM STRUTS | | ALIGN WITH STRUCTURAL GRID. | | 10) NOTE FOR ALL PLANTERS THAT ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS | | SHALL BE REMOVED PRIOR TO FILLING WITH SOIL. | | 11) S-1 -CONNECTION FROM DOWNSPOUT TO BUILDING NOT | | SHOW. (SEE NOTE #7). | | 12) S-1A - FOUNDATION NOTES ARE INCOMPLETE: ELEVATION | | 100'-0" IS X.XX NGVD. WHAT IS X.XX? | | 13) TREE ALTERATION PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE | | ENTIRE CITY COMMONS SITE. PLANNING STAFF WILL | | COORDINATE WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. CONTACT ROBERT | | KUSSNER, LANDSCAPE PLANNER, AT 822-1435. | | 14) ON SP-1, AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE VISITOR | | CENTER, WHAT IS THE TRANSITION FROM THE LANDSCAPED AREA | | TO THE EXISTING PAVERS? THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE ANY | | HEADER CURB OR OTHER EDGE. ALSO, THE SHAPE OF THIS | | LANDSCAPE AREA CHANGES BETWEEN THE DIFFERENT PLANS. | | CONFIRM THE ACTUAL LIMITS. | | 15) OTHER LANDCAPE COMMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED THROUGH | | SEPARATE LANDSCAPE REVIEWER. | | | | MATT FLIS - 822-1445 |
|
|