| Plan Review Stops For Permit 08120230 |
| Review Stop |
AD |
ADDRESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jnguyen |
Date |
2009-01-12 |
Time |
13:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jnguyen |
Date |
2009-01-09 |
Time |
10:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-12 13:35:37 | BRENDA KELLEY MENTIONED THERE WERE TWO RETAIL TENANT | | | SPACES ON THE FIRST FLOOR FACING CLEMATIS ST OF THE | | | CITY CENTER PARKING GARAGE (AT 500 BANYAN BLVD). I | | | EXAMINED THE SITE PLANS & WENT OUT ON LOCATION TO | | | INSPECT THE AREA FOR MYSELF. GOING EAST TO WEST, I | | | DECIDED TO GIVE THE FIRST TENANT SPACE AN ADDRESS OF | | | 505 CLEMATIS ST & THE SECOND ONE WAS ASSIGNED 509 | | | CLEMATIS ST. I SENT OUT AN E-MAIL NOTIFICATION ADVISING | | | ALL OF THE RELEVANT PARTIES OF THE NEW SECONDARY | | | ADDRESSES & CREATED THEIR SEQUENTIAL UNIT RECORDS 0001 | | | & 0002 IN COMMUNITYPLUS UNDER PCN# 74434321010250010. I | | | ALSO INFORMED PAPA TO FIX THEIR WEB SITE TO SHOW THE | | | PRIMARY ADDRESS OF 500 BANYAN BLVD INTEAD OF THE | | | INCORRECT ADDRESS, 500 1ST ST FOR THIS PARCEL. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2009-01-27 |
Time |
10:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2009-01-27 |
Time |
10:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2008-12-15 |
Time |
07:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mjacobs |
Date |
2008-12-15 |
Time |
07:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-12 16:49:42 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | | PERMIT: 08120230 | | | ADD: 500 BANYAN BLVD (RETAIL SPACE) | | | CONT: CATALFUMO CONSTRUCTION LTD. | | | TEL: (561)253-2580 | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | | | REVIEW: 1ST | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | 1) INFORMATIONAL: WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE | | | INDICATE THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS | | | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL | | | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE | | | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO | | | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED | | | COOPERATION. | | | | | | 2) FL S S 713.13 NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED | | | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT. NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE | | | WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS NOT | | | ACTUALLY COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING | | | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) | | | THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE | | | CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. | | | | | | 3) INFORMATIONAL: PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT (FIRST | | | TIME REVIEW) AFTER JULY 1ST, 2007 SHALL BE REVIEWED TO | | | THE 2004 FBC BUILDING WITH THE 2007 SUPPLEMENTS. THIS | | | INFORMATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. | | | | | | 4) THE DRAWINGS FAIL TO INDICATE THE TYPE OF BUILDING | | | PER CHAPTER 6, THE USE AND OCCUPANCY PER CHAPTER 3 AND | | | TABLE 503. | | | | | | 5) SHEET A1 SHOWS ONE OPEN SPACE FOR THE RETAIL STORE. | | | THE OCCUPANT LOAD OF THE SPACE REQUIRES TWO EXITS. FBC | | | 1014.2.1 (EXCEPTION #2) THE SEPARATION DISTANCE OF THE | | | EXIT DOORS OR EXIT ACCESS DOORS SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN | | | ONE-THIRD OF THE LENGTH OF THE MAXIMUM OVERALL DIAGONAL | | | DIMENSION OF THE AREA SERVED. THE LOCATION OF THE DOORS | | | DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENT. SHOW COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 6) THE ORIGINAL PERMIT SHEET A1.1 REVISION #6 DATED | | | 9-16-08 SHOWS TWO SEPARATE RETAIL SPACES AT THE SAME | | | LOCATION. THE DOORS WERE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TENANT | | | SEPARATION WALL FOR SPACE #1.101 AND SPACE #1.102. THE | | | PLANS SUBMITTED DO NOT MATCH THE PERMIT SET; THE | | | SEPARATION WALL IS REMOVED, INDICATING ONE TENANT. A | | | REVISION OF SHEET A1.1 SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR THE | | | ORIGINAL PERMIT SET INDICATING THE REMOVAL OF THE WALL | | | WHICH ONCE SEPARATED THE TWO TENANTS. | | | | | | MYRON JACOBS | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEWER | | | (561)805-6726 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-02-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-02-06 |
Time |
16:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-02-06 |
Time |
16:12 |
Sent To |
B |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-01-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-01-26 |
Time |
14:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2009-01-26 |
Time |
12:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-26 13:35:17 | | | | | | | | | | THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES: | | | | | | THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2007 REVISIONS, 2005 | | | NEC, NFPA-72 2002, NFPA-101 2003, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, | | | CHAPTER 1.AND FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | 1} THE POWER DENSITY CALCULATION ON SHEET E2 IS | | | INCORRECT AS IT USES 2.1 W/SQ.FT. TABLE 13-415.2.C.1 | | | INDICATES 1.5 W/SQ.FT FOR RETAIL. PLEASE CORRECT THE | | | CALCULATION. | | | | | | 2} THE SQUARE FOOTAGE GIVEN IN THE CALCULATION DOES NOT | | | CORRELATE WITH THE SQUARE FOOTAGE ON SHEET A1. | | | CORRELATE SAME. | | | | | | 3} SHEET E4 ELECTRICAL RISER DIAGRAM THE GEC SIZE IS | | | NOT INDICATED FOR MAIN2 OF 3 BUT MUST BE A MINIMUM OF | | | #4 PER 250.66. INDICATE SIZE. | | | | | | 4} THE GEC FOR MAIN 3OF 3 IS LABELED AS 4-600KMCM. | | | ALTHOUGH NOT A VIOLATION, IF PART OF THE PERMITTED SET | | | OF PLANS THEY MUST BE INSTALLED, OR A REVISION WILL BE | | | MUST BE SUBMITTED TO MAKE A CHANGE IN THE FUTURE. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-12-16 |
Time |
16:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-12-16 |
Time |
14:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-16 16:08:18 | | | | | | | | | | | | | THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES: | | | | | | THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2007 REVISIONS, 2005 | | | NEC, NFPA-72 2002, NFPA-101 2003, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, | | | CHAPTER 1.AND FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | THE FORE REFERENCE STANDARDS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE | | | PLANS. | | | | | | 1} PER CHAPTER 13 FBC, SUBCHAPTER 13-400.0.C.4, PROVIDE | | | PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS FOR REVIEW PER 13-415.2. | | | | | | 2} THE CONDUCTORS FOR THE AIR HANDLERS DO NOT COMPLY | | | WITH THE OCP IN THE PANEL SCHEDULES PER 310.16, AND DO | | | NOT CORRELATE WITH THE MANUFACTURERS SPEC'S ON SHEET | | | MO. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 561/805-6718 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-02-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-02-09 |
Time |
10:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-02-09 |
Time |
10:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-09 10:36:22 | *****APPROVED***** | | | | | | | | | PLAN SHEETS A1, E1, AND E2 WERE STAMPED, INITIALED, AND | | | DATED; PLAN SHEET FP1 WAS PREVIOUSLY FIRE-STAMPED ON | | | 01/28/2009. | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-01-28 |
Time |
13:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-01-28 |
Time |
12:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-28 12:26:48 | *****PROVISO***** | | | | | | 1. STRUCTURES UNDERGOING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, OR | | | DEMOLITION OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY WIITH NFPA 241. ON | | | SHEET A1, DELETE REFERENCE TO 2008 NFPA 241; AT THE | | | TIME OF ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL, THE 2000 EDITION OF NFPA | | | 241 WAS REFERENCED. | | | | | | (PLAN SHEET FP1 WAS STAMPED, INITIALED, AND DATED; THE | | | FOLLOWING SHEETS ARE TO BE FIRE-STAMPED WHEN THE ABOVE | | | COMMENT AS WELL AS THE ELECTRICAL REVIEWER'S COMMENTS | | | HAVE BEEN SATISFIED: A1, E1, AND E2.) | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-12-17 |
Time |
16:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-12-17 |
Time |
15:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-17 16:14:45 | *****UNSAT***** | | | | | | | | | 1. STRUCTURES UNDERGOING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, OR | | | DEMOLITION OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY WIITH NFPA 241. | | | | | | 2. IN ORDER TO PREVENT DELAY IN EMERGENCY RESPONSE, HOW | | | DOES RESCUE PERSONNEL DISTINGUISH THE PROJECTED TENANT | | | SPACE FROM THE OTHER TENANT SPACE(S) ON THE FLOOR | | | AND/OR THE BUILDING. PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT IF A SUITE | | | NUMBER IS REQUIRED, THAT SUITE NUMBER SHALL BE INCLUDED | | | IN THE ADDRESS LOCATED IN THE TITLE BLOCK OF EACH | | | SUBMITTED PLAN SHEET. | | | | | | 3. ON SHEET A1 - CAPTION 3 - LIFE SAFETY PLAN, PLEASE | | | EXPLAIN WHY THERE IS NO FIRE ALARM STROBE LOCATED IN | | | EACH RESTROOM. | | | | | | 4. SPECIFY THE NEW INTERIOR FINISH MATERIAL FOR THE | | | WALLS AND CEILING IN TERMS OF CLASS A, CLASS B, OR | | | CLASS C. | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | | LETTER INDICATING WHERE EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
|
Date |
2009-04-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-04-27 |
Time |
14:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-04-27 |
Time |
14:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-04-27 14:18:00 | SENT TO RREGUEIRO DESK |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-01-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-01-22 |
Time |
09:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-01-22 |
Time |
09:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-01-22 09:19:34 | TO "BOB"#10 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-12-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-12-20 |
Time |
11:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-12-11 |
Time |
09:04 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-11 09:04:45 | TO "BOB"#8 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-05-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-05-05 |
Time |
10:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-05-04 |
Time |
16:57 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2009-05-05 10:27:26 | DETAIL #5 FOR THROUGH-PENETRATIONS SHALL BE APPLIED TO | | | BOTH DUCTS PENETRATING THE TENANT SEPARATION WALL. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-02-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-02-05 |
Time |
19:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-02-05 |
Time |
19:17 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-12-20 |
Time |
11:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-12-20 |
Time |
10:41 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-20 11:08:12 | REVIEW #: 1ST | | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS, REVISE PLANS | | | ACCORDINGLY AND RESUBMIT FOR REVIEW: | | | | | | 1. PAGE M1 SHOWS A PLENUM RETURN CEILING CAVITY. IN | | | ADDITION, THIS PAGE ALSO SHOWS TWO CEILING MOUNTED | | | BATHROOM EXHAUST FANS (EF1 AND EF2). THESE FANS ARE | | | DISCHARGING THROUGH AN EXHAUST DUCT WHICH IS LOCATED IN | | | THE PLENUM CEILING CAVITY. THIS DUCT WOULD BE UNDER A | | | POSITIVE PRESSURE. EXHAUST DUCTS UNDER POSITIVE | | | PRESSURE SHALL NOT PASS THROUGH DUCTS OR PLENUMS IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 601.3. PLEASE SHOW AN EXHAUST | | | CONFIGURATION WHICH DOES NOT PLACE A POSITIVELY | | | PRESSURIZED EXHAUST DUCT WITHIN THE PLENUM SPACE IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | | 561.805.6719 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-02-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-02-04 |
Time |
11:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-02-04 |
Time |
11:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-04 11:59:07 | PASSED PROVISO -- DRINKING FOUNTAIN SPOUT SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH SECTION 11-4.15.2 SPOUT HEIGHT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-12-16 |
Time |
09:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-12-16 |
Time |
09:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-16 09:41:14 | DENIED | | | REFERENCE: | | | FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | | | 1. SUBMIT A CODE SUMMARY. SHOW OCCUPANCY OF BUILDING, | | | DESIGN CRITERIA (FBC-2004 W/2005, 2006 2007 REVISIONS), | | | INDICATE SQUARE FOOTAGE, ETC. SECTION 106.1.1 | | | | | | 2. SHT A1 MOST OCCUPANCIES REQUIRE A DRINKING FOUNTAIN. | | | ONCE THE OCCUPANCY IS DECLARED, AND IF REQUIRED, A | | | DRINKING FOUNTAIN SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN. | | | | | | 3. IF A DRINKING FOUNTAIN IS REQUIRED, THEN SUBMIT A | | | DETAIL SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 11-4.15 WITH ALL | | | SUBSECTIONS AS WELL AS SECTION 11-4.1.3(10)(A) | | | PROVISIONS FOR THOSE WHO HAVE DIFFICULTY BENDING OR | | | STOOPING. | | | | | | 4. SHT A4 SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 11-4.16.5 FLUSH | | | CONTROLS. DETAILS 04(A) & 05(A) SHOW CONTROLS ON THE | | | WALL SIDE. CORRELATE WITH DETAIL 01 WHICH SHOWS & | | | INDICATES THE CONTROLS ON THE WIDE SIDE. | | | | | | 5. ALL SHEETS WITH MEINHARDT ENGINEERING TITLE BLOCK. | | | THE STATE OF FLORIDA INDICATE FOR EB 25980 THE NAME AS | | | MEINHARDT OF TEXAS INC. AND THE ADDRESS AS 5429 LBJ | | | FREEWAY SUITE 300 DALLAS TAXAS, BUT THE TITLE BLOCKS DO | | | NOT INDICATE THIS. PLEASE HAVE THE TITLE BLOCKS REFLECT | | | THE NAME AND ADDRESS AS INDICATED IN THE FLORIDA STATE | | | DBPR RECORDS. THE FLORIDA INFORMATION CAN ALSO BE | | | INCLUDED IN THE TITLE BLOCKS. FAC 61G15-23.002(2) & FS | | | 471.025. | | | | | | 6. SHT P0 WATER ISOMETRIC WATER RISER DIAGRAM. IDENTIFY | | | THE FITTING AT THE TOP OF THE DROP AS IT IS NOT | | | INDICATED IN THE PLUMBING LEGEND. IF IT IS AN AIR | | | CHAMBER, PLEASE DELETE AS AIR CHAMBERS ARE NOT | | | APPROVED. IF IT IS A WATER HAMMER ARRESTOR, THEN THE | | | WATER HAMMER ARRESTOR SHALL BE LOCATED NEAR THE | | | FIXTURES IN AN "EFFECTIVE RANGE" NOT IN THE CEILING. | | | PDI-WH 201 & SECTION 604.9. | | | | | | 7. SHT P1 SUBMIT A CONDENSATE ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM | | | INDICATING ALL PIPE SIZES, TRAPS, AND THE POINT OF | | | DISPOSAL. SECTIONS 106.3.5.1.3 AND 314.2.1. | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | | (561) 805-6721 | | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-02-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2009-02-03 |
Time |
09:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2009-02-03 |
Time |
09:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2009-02-03 09:08:24 | ZONING REVIEW: PASSED | | | | | | ** PLANS REVISED TO REMOVE HUNG CEILING | | | | | | MATT FLIS - 822-1445 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2008-12-15 |
Time |
09:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2008-12-15 |
Time |
09:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2008-12-15 09:37:03 | ZONING REVIEW: FAILED | | | | | | ** UNDER DOWNTOWN ACTION COMMITTEE CASE 07-14, THE | | | BOARD GRANTED A VARIANCE TO ALLOW A CEILING HEIGHT NO | | | LESS THAN 9'-0" IN HEIGHT. THESE PLANS INDICATE CEILING | | | HEIGHT AT 8'-0" CLEAR. PLEASE ADJUST. | | | | | | MATT FLIS - 822-1445 | | | |
|
|
