Plan Review Details - Permit 08110405
Plan Review Stops For Permit 08110405
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 6 Status P Date 2010-10-28 Cont ID  
Sent By lmartine Date 2010-10-28 Time 11:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmartine Date 2010-10-28 Time 11:17 Sent To  
Notes
2010-10-28 11:22:12BUILDING PROVISO
  
  
 UPDATED ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE
 SUBMITTED ON THE 2007 FORMS.
  
  
  
 LUIS MARTINEZ
 CHIEF PLANS EXAMINER
 561-805-6710
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2010-03-17 Cont ID  
Sent By pyusko Date 2010-03-17 Time 14:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pyusko Date 2010-03-17 Time 14:27 Sent To  
Notes
2010-03-17 14:44:08BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. ENERGY CALCS ARE REQUIRED
 2. HISTORICAL APPROVAL IS REQUIRED
 3. SEPARATE PERMITS FOR FENCE AND WALL
  
 LUIS MARTINEZ, 805-6710
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2009-05-28 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2009-05-28 Time 08:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2009-05-28 Time 08:27 Sent To  
Notes
2009-05-28 08:29:53BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST.
  
 1- PLANS SUBMITTED NEED TO BE COORDINATED. SHEET 6.1
 SUBMITTED IS THE OLD SHEET THAT WAS DENIED THE FIRST
 TIME PLANS WERE REVIEWED. PROVIDE REVISED SHEET 6.1.
  
 2- FLAT ROOF PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED: SPECIFY WHICH
 APPROVED ASSEMBLY AND BASE SHEET FASTENING OPTION IS
 GOING TO BE USED. PROVIDE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR NAIL
 ENHANCING AT PERIMETER AND CORNER AREAS AS REQUIRED BY
 GENERAL LIMITATION #7. PRODUCT APPROVAL NOA SUBMITTED
 WAS SUPERSEDED BY DADE COUNTY. SEE ATTACHED COPY FROM
 DADE COUNTY WEBSITE. NEED TO PROVIDE CURRENT NOA.
  
 3- PROVIDE INFORMATION REQUESTED ON PROVISO DATED
 5/6/09. SEE ATTACHED COPY. NEED GUARDRAILS COMPLETE
 DETAILS/SPECS. PRODUCT APPROVAL FL4334-R3 SUBMITTED IS
 FOR 2007 CODE VERSION. PLANS WERE REVIEW UNDER 2004
 CODE VERSION. ALSO, NEED TO PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL
 FOR ALL DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 (561)805-6712
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2009-05-06 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2009-05-06 Time 13:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2009-05-06 Time 10:07 Sent To  
Notes
2009-05-06 13:15:28BUILDING REVIEW APPROVED WITH PROVISO:
  
 1- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
 BALCONY GUARDRAIL TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH TABLE R301.5
 AND SEC. R312 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 2- PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR EXTERIOR
 SWING DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. DCA RULE 9B-72.
 ***NOTE: DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE THEM
 PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC
 2004.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2009-03-03 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2009-03-03 Time 17:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2009-03-03 Time 17:02 Sent To PC
Notes
2009-03-03 17:06:43RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION/ALTERATION/RENOVATION
 BUILDING REVIEW SECOND CHECKLIST.
 REVIEW UNDER 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE WITH 2007
 REVISIONS.
  
 1- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. SEC. 713.13
 FLORIDA STATUTE.
 ***NOTE: THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE RECORDED LATER AT TIME OF
 PERMIT PICK UP.
  
 2- SHEET 1.1:
 A) CLARIFY SCOPE OF WORK. PERMIT APPLICATION DESCRIBES
 REMODELING THE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR ACCORDING TO
 PLANS. PERMIT APPLICATION DOESN'T INCLUDE THE ADDITION
 OF THE NEW BALCONY. ALSO, IS NOT CLEAR IF AREA OF WORK
 IS THE REAR ACCESSORY BUILDING ONLY. OR IF EXISTING
 MAIN HOUSE IS GOING TO HAVE SOME WORK ALSO. THERE IS
 ONLY ONE NOTE ON MAIN HOUSE SAYING THAT EXISTING
 RESIDENCE TO BE REMODELED, BUT THE DRAWINGS DON'T SHOW
 ANY WORK FOR THE MAIN HOUSE. FENCES AND PRIVACY WALL
 ARE TO BE DONE UNDER SEPARATE PERMITS. CLARIFY NOTES
 REGARDING GRADING SLOPE. IS REGRADING PART OF THE SCOPE
 OF WORK IN THIS PERMIT?
 ***COMMENTS TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED:
 (A) STILL NO CLEAR. PLANS SAY "NEW COVERED ENTRY AT
 EXISTING ENTRY" AND "NEW ADDITION" ON REAR OF HOUSE BUT
 THERE IS NOT INFORMATION PROVIDED ON PLANS. PROVIDE
 ONLY THE INFORMATION FOR SCOPE OF WORK TO BE PERFORMED
 AND PROVIDE INFORMATION ON SEPARATE PERMITS WHEN
 SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED.
  
 3- SHEET 2.1: CLARIFY SCOPE OF WORK FOR GUEST HOUSE
 NOTE: EXPAND BUILDING +/- 1'-6" TO ACCOMMODATE STAIRS
 TO MEET CURRENT CODE. THERE IS NOT INFORMATION PROVIDED
 TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THIS NOTE. AND, PLANS DON'T
 SHOW ANY BUILDING EXPANSION. ON THE OTHER HAND CHECK
 ZONING COMMENTS REGARDING BUILDING EXPANSION.
 ***OK.
  
 4- SHEET 3.1:
 A) SPECIFY SAFETY GLASS FOR WINDOWS ON BATHROOMS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. R308.4 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL
 CODE.
 ***COMMENTS TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED:
 (A) PLANS SUBMITTED SPECIFY ""ALL BATH WINDOWS TO BE
 GLAZED FOR PRIVACY". PRIVACY AND SAFETY GLASS ARE TWO
 DIFFERENT THINGS. SEE SEC. R308.4 AND REVISE AS
 REQUIRED.
  
 B) CLARIFY SCOPE OF WORK FOR GUEST HOUSE REGARDING THE
 EXPANSION OF BUILDING +/- 1'-6" TO ACCOMMODATE STAIRS.
 THERE IS NOT INFORMATION ON PLANS REGARDING THIS ISSUE.
 ***OK.
  
 C) CLARIFY FLOOR FRAMING NOTE. THERE IS NOT SECTION #1
 ON SHEET 6.1. ALSO, CLARIFY SCOPE OF WORK TO BE
 PERFORMED. COORDINATE WITH ITEM 2A ABOVE.
 ***OK.
  
 D) NEW BALCONY FRAMING PLAN:
 *SPECIFY ALL BEAMS. CLARIFY WHY SHOWING ONLY ONE MEMBER
 TO RECEIVE ALL FLOOR JOISTS?.
 ***OK.
  
 **CLARIFY IF USING 2X6 FLOOR JOISTS OR 2X8 FLOOR
 JOISTS. BOTH ARE MENTIONED ON PLAN. SEE COMMENTS ON
 REVIEWED SET OF PLANS.
 NOTE: COORDINATE SIZE OF JOIST HANGER ACCORDINGLY.
 ***OK.
  
 ***CLARIFY ATTACHMENT OF WOOD POST TO BEAM. PROVIDE
 DETAIL. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004 TO
 VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALCULATED LOADS OF SEC.
 R301 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. WHY IS THERE A
 LEDGER SHOWN INSTEAD OF A BEAM TO POST CONNECTION?.
 CLEARLY SPECIFY CONNECTIONS AT CORNER POSTS AND
 INTERMEDIATE POSTS.
 ***OK.
  
 ****SPECIFY HOW MANY SCREWS ARE REQUIRED TO ATTACH 2X6
 WOOD DECK. TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH UPLIFT LOADS OF
 SEC. R301 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
 ***OK.
  
 *****CLARIFY WHY DIMENSIONS SHOW 6" WHEN SHOWING THE
 WOOD POST IF THE POSTS ARE SPECIFIED AS 4X4 POSTS? SEE
 COMMENTS ON PLANS.
 ***OK.
  
  
 E) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
 GUARDRAIL TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH TABLE R301.5, AND
 SECTION R312 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
 ***COMMENTS TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED:
 (A) DETAIL SUBMITTED ON SHEET 5.1 DOESN'T PROVIDE ANY
 FASTENING SPECIFICATIONS. ALSO, THERE IS A NOTE SAYING
 THAT "WOOD HANDRAIL AND GUARDRAIL TO BE DESIGNED IN
 ACCORDANCE TO 2004 FBC". DESIGNER OF RECORD NEEDS TO
 PROVIDE THE DESIGN INFORMATION, NOT JUST CITE THE CODE
 IN GENERAL.
  
 5- SHEET 4.1:
 A) INFORMATION SHOWN ON EXISTING ROOF PLAN DOESN'T
 MATCH INFORMATION SHOWN ON CONNECTOR SCHEDULE. CLARIFY
 SCOPE OF WORK. COORDINATE WITH ITEM 2A ABOVE.
 ***OK.
  
 B) REVISE NOTES AT BOTTOM OF CONNECTOR SCHEDULE. SEE
 COMMENTS ON PLANS. SEE SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA
 RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR MINIMUM NAIL SIZE/TYPE AND SPACING
 INCLUDING ON ROOF ZONE #3.
 ***OK.
  
 C) COMPONENTS AND CLADDING PRESSURES ZONES TABLES FOR
 ROOF AND WALLS IS MISSING THE NAILING SPACING AT
 INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS. IT ONLY CALLS FOR NAILING AT
 EDGES. SEE COMMENTS ON PLANS.
 ***COMMENTS TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED:
 (A) NEED TO REVISE SPACING AT INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS.
 SEE SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE
 AND REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 D) CLARIFY WHY THE NAILING SPACING SHOWN ON WALLS
 COMPONENTS AND CLADDING TABLE IS CLOSER TOGETHER FOR
 WALL ZONE 4 THAN FOR WALL ZONE 5.
 ***COMMENTS TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED:
 (A) NO DONE. WHY ZONE 4 IS STRONGER THAN ZONE 5?
  
 6- SHEET 5.1:
 A) TYPICAL TWO STORY WALL SECTION:
 *CLEARLY SPECIFY WHAT'S NEW AND WHAT'S EXISTING.
 COORDINATE WITH ITEM 2A ABOVE.
 ***COMMENTS TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED:
 (A) STILL NO CLEAR WHAT'S NEW AND WHAT'S EXISTING.
 INFORMATION PROVIDED IS VERY CONFUSING. EG: IS THERE A
 NEW T&G SOFFIT?. HOW IS THE INSTALLATION OF NEW H10
 SIMPSON CONNECTORS DONE?. IS THERE A NEW GYPSUM BOARD
 CEILING ON INSIDE?. IS THER A NEW WALL SHEATHING
 OUTSIDE?. INFORMATION PROVIDED IS NOT CLEAR.
  
 **SPECIFY ALL CONNECTORS FROM ROOF TO FOOTING TO SHOW
 CONTINUOUS LOAD PATH AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R601.2 OF 2004
 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
 NOTE: CLARIFY WHY ONLY SECOND FLOOR JOISTS ARE RESTING
 ON ONLY ONE TOP PLATE IF THIS IS A BEARING WALL?.
 ***RESPONSE TO INFORMATION SUBMITTED:
 (A) ARE CONNECTORS NEW OR THEY ARE EXISTING?.
  
 ***SOFFIT AREA SPECIFIES 3"X16" VENTS AT 72"O.C..
 PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THAT THESE VENTS ARE
 ADEQUATE TO COMPLY WITH SEC. R806 OF 2004 FLORIDA
 RESIDENTIAL CODE.
 SEE COMMENTS ON PLANS.
 ***OK.
  
 B) DOOR AND WINDOWS JAMB DETAILS DON'T MATCH WITH
 TYPICAL WINDOW OPENING SECTION AND TYPICAL WALL FRAMING
 SECTION. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEE COMMENTS ON
 PLANS AND RETURN REVIEWED SET AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED.
 ***OK.
  
 *** C) NEW COMMENTS TO NEW TYPICAL STAIR DETAIL
 SUBMITTED:
 (A) CLARIFY IF RE-DOING EXISTING STAIRS. RISER TO TREAD
 RATION SHOWN ON THIS DETAIL DOESN'T COMPLY WITH SEC.
 R311.5.3.2 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. ALSO, WHY
 SHOWING A GUARDRAIL ON STAIRWAY. GUARDRAIL NOT
 REQUIRED. ONLY HANDRAIL IS REQUIRED. SPECIFICATIONS
 CALL FOR 2 LAYERS OF TYPE X GYPSUM BD. ONLY ONE LAYER
 WAS SHOWN. SEE COMMENTS ON PLANS.
  
 7- BRING REVISED PLANS FOR HISTORIC REVIEW STAMP (5TH
 FLOOR) PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE.
 ***NEED TO BRING ANY PLANS THAT ARE REVISED AFTER
 TODAY'S COMMENTS.
  
 8- OWES $1.70 FOR NEW BALCONY RADON FEES AS REQUIRED BY
 CHAPTER 10D-91 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE., SUBPART B.
 ***OK.
  
 9- PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY
 DCA RULE 9B-72 FOR:
 A) ALL NEW EXTERIOR DOORS. CLEARLY IDENTIFY ENTRY DOORS
 AND BALCONY DOORS.
 *** INFORMATION NOT PROVIDED.
  
 10- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
 (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
 *** THIS APPLIES TO PRODUCT APPROVALS NOT SUBMITTED AT
 THIS TIME.
  
 11- NEW COMMENT:
 (A) CLARIFY WHY SUBMITTING SEPARATE WIND LOAD
 CALCULATIONS.
 (B) SEPARATE WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS DON'T MATCH THOSE
 SHOWN ON SHEET 4.1. REVISE AS REQUIRED.
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 (561)805-6712
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2009-01-14 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2009-01-14 Time 12:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2009-01-14 Time 12:33 Sent To PC
Notes
2009-01-14 13:26:24RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION/ALTERATION/RENOVATION
 BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST.
 REVIEW UNDER 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE WITH 2007
 REVISIONS.
  
 1- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. SEC. 713.13
 FLORIDA STATUTE.
 ***NOTE: THIS DOCUMENT MAY BE RECORDED LATER AT TIME OF
 PERMIT PICK UP.
  
 2- SHEET 1.1:
 A) CLARIFY SCOPE OF WORK. PERMIT APPLICATION DESCRIBES
 REMODELING THE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR ACCORDING TO
 PLANS. PERMIT APPLICATION DOESN'T INCLUDE THE ADDITION
 OF THE NEW BALCONY. ALSO, IS NOT CLEAR IF AREA OF WORK
 IS THE REAR ACCESSORY BUILDING ONLY. OR IF EXISTING
 MAIN HOUSE IS GOING TO HAVE SOME WORK ALSO. THERE IS
 ONLY ONE NOTE ON MAIN HOUSE SAYING THAT EXISTING
 RESIDENCE TO BE REMODELED, BUT THE DRAWINGS DON'T SHOW
 ANY WORK FOR THE MAIN HOUSE. FENCES AND PRIVACY WALL
 ARE TO BE DONE UNDER SEPARATE PERMITS. CLARIFY NOTES
 REGARDING GRADING SLOPE. IS REGRADING PART OF THE SCOPE
 OF WORK IN THIS PERMIT?
  
 ***NOTE: SEE COMMENTS ON REVIEWED SET OF PLANS AND
 RETURN REVIEWED SET AFTER COMMENTS ARE ADDRESSED ON
 ORIGINAL PLANS TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS.
  
 3- SHEET 2.1: CLARIFY SCOPE OF WORK FOR GUEST HOUSE
 NOTE: EXPAND BUILDING +/- 1'-6" TO ACCOMMODATE STAIRS
 TO MEET CURRENT CODE. THERE IS NOT INFORMATION PROVIDED
 TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THIS NOTE. AND, PLANS DON'T
 SHOW ANY BUILDING EXPANSION. ON THE OTHER HAND CHECK
 ZONING COMMENTS REGARDING BUILDING EXPANSION.
  
 4- SHEET 3.1:
 A) SPECIFY SAFETY GLASS FOR WINDOWS ON BATHROOMS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. R308.4 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL
 CODE.
  
 B) CLARIFY SCOPE OF WORK FOR GUEST HOUSE REGARDING THE
 EXPANSION OF BUILDING +/- 1'-6" TO ACCOMMODATE STAIRS.
 THERE IS NOT INFORMATION ON PLANS REGARDING THIS ISSUE.
  
 C) CLARIFY FLOOR FRAMING NOTE. THERE IS NOT SECTION #1
 ON SHEET 6.1. ALSO, CLARIFY SCOPE OF WORK TO BE
 PERFORMED. COORDINATE WITH ITEM 2A ABOVE.
  
 D) NEW BALCONY FRAMING PLAN:
 *SPECIFY ALL BEAMS. CLARIFY WHY SHOWING ONLY ONE MEMBER
 TO RECEIVE ALL FLOOR JOISTS?.
  
 **CLARIFY IF USING 2X6 FLOOR JOISTS OR 2X8 FLOOR
 JOISTS. BOTH ARE MENTIONED ON PLAN. SEE COMMENTS ON
 REVIEWED SET OF PLANS.
 NOTE: COORDINATE SIZE OF JOIST HANGER ACCORDINGLY.
  
 ***CLARIFY ATTACHMENT OF WOOD POST TO BEAM. PROVIDE
 DETAIL. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004 TO
 VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE CALCULATED LOADS OF SEC.
 R301 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. WHY IS THERE A
 LEDGER SHOWN INSTEAD OF A BEAM TO POST CONNECTION?.
 CLEARLY SPECIFY CONNECTIONS AT CORNER POSTS AND
 INTERMEDIATE POSTS.
  
 ****SPECIFY HOW MANY SCREWS ARE REQUIRED TO ATTACH 2X6
 WOOD DECK. TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH UPLIFT LOADS OF
 SEC. R301 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 *****CLARIFY WHY DIMENSIONS SHOW 6" WHEN SHOWING THE
 WOOD POST IF THE POSTS ARE SPECIFIED AS 4X4 POSTS? SEE
 COMMENTS ON PLANS.
  
  
 E) PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
 GUARDRAIL TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH TABLE R301.5, AND
 SECTION R312 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 5- SHEET 4.1:
 A) INFORMATION SHOWN ON EXISTING ROOF PLAN DOESN'T
 MATCH INFORMATION SHOWN ON CONNECTOR SCHEDULE. CLARIFY
 SCOPE OF WORK. COORDINATE WITH ITEM 2A ABOVE.
  
 B) REVISE NOTES AT BOTTOM OF CONNECTOR SCHEDULE. SEE
 COMMENTS ON PLANS. SEE SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA
 RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR MINIMUM NAIL SIZE/TYPE AND SPACING
 INCLUDING ON ROOF ZONE #3.
  
 C) COMPONENTS AND CLADDING PRESSURES ZONES TABLES FOR
 ROOF AND WALLS IS MISSING THE NAILING SPACING AT
 INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS. IT ONLY CALLS FOR NAILING AT
 EDGES. SEE COMMENTS ON PLANS.
  
 D) CLARIFY WHY THE NAILING SPACING SHOWN ON WALLS
 COMPONENTS AND CLADDING TABLE IS CLOSER TOGETHER FOR
 WALL ZONE 4 THAN FOR WALL ZONE 5.
  
 6- SHEET 5.1:
 A) TYPICAL TWO STORY WALL SECTION:
 *CLEARLY SPECIFY WHAT'S NEW AND WHAT'S EXISTING.
 COORDINATE WITH ITEM 2A ABOVE.
  
 **SPECIFY ALL CONNECTORS FROM ROOF TO FOOTING TO SHOW
 CONTINUOUS LOAD PATH AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R601.2 OF 2004
 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
 NOTE: CLARIFY WHY ONLY SECOND FLOOR JOISTS ARE RESTING
 ON ONLY ONE TOP PLATE IF THIS IS A BEARING WALL?.
  
 ***SOFFIT AREA SPECIFIES 3"X16" VENTS AT 72"O.C..
 PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THAT THESE VENTS ARE
 ADEQUATE TO COMPLY WITH SEC. R806 OF 2004 FLORIDA
 RESIDENTIAL CODE.
 SEE COMMENTS ON PLANS.
  
 B) DOOR AND WINDOWS JAMB DETAILS DON'T MATCH WITH
 TYPICAL WINDOW OPENING SECTION AND TYPICAL WALL FRAMING
 SECTION. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEE COMMENTS ON
 PLANS AND RETURN REVIEWED SET AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED.
  
 7- BRING REVISED PLANS FOR HISTORIC REVIEW STAMP (5TH
 FLOOR) PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE.
  
 8- OWES $1.70 FOR NEW BALCONY RADON FEES AS REQUIRED BY
 CHAPTER 10D-91 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE., SUBPART B.
  
 9- PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY
 DCA RULE 9B-72 FOR:
 A) METAL ROOF AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
  
 B) ALL NEW EXTERIOR DOORS. CLEARLY IDENTIFY ENTRY DOORS
 AND BALCONY DOORS.
  
 C) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS.
  
 D) STORM SHUTTERS IF WINDOWS AND DOORS WITH GLAZING
 DON'T HAVE IMPACT GLAZING.
 ***NOTE: PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. SEE
 ATTACHED COPY. AND, CLEARLY MARK ON SHUTTERS DRAWINGS
 SPECIFIC MOUNTING CONDITIONS (EG: WALL MOUNTED, BUILD
 OUT, ETC) AND SPECIFIC ANCHOR TYPE AND SPACING TO BE
 USED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF
 SEC. R301 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.
  
 10- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING
 (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS
 REQUIRED BY SEC. 106.3.3 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.
  
 JULIO GOMEZ
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 (561)805-6712
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 6 Status P Date 2010-05-18 Cont ID  
Sent By btrobaug Date 2010-05-18 Time 16:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By btrobaug Date 2010-05-18 Time 16:15 Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2010-05-03 Cont ID  
Sent By btrobaug Date 2010-05-03 Time 12:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By btrobaug Date 2010-05-03 Time 12:16 Sent To  
Notes
2010-05-03 12:25:43THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES:
  
 THE 2007 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE, 2009
 REVISIONS, 2008 NEC, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, CHAPTER 1.AND
 FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING:
  
 1} AN ELECTRICAL PERMIT IS REQUIRED PER 105.1 FBC AS
 AMENDED.PLANS INDICATING THE SCOPE OF WORK MUST BE
 SUBMITTED WITH THE APPLICATION. 106.1 FBC AS AMENDED.
  
 BILL TROBAUGH
 ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561/805-6718
  
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2010-03-17 Cont ID  
Sent By pyusko Date 2010-03-17 Time 15:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pyusko Date 2010-03-17 Time 15:01 Sent To  
Notes
2010-03-17 15:33:00ELECTRICAL REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. NOTE: REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THE 2008 NEC. IF UNDER
 THE 2005 NEC PLEASE DISREGARD AREA COMMENTS NOTED WITH
 2008 NEC.
  
 2. NOTE: THERE IS CONFUSION OVER THE SERVICE AS SHOWN.
 THE ELECTRICAL RISER STATES *EXISTING ELECTRICAL RISER
 DIAGRAM*. HOWEVER, THERE ARE SEVERAL ITEMS WHICH ARE
 ALSO SHOWN AS NEW. REVIEW IS BASED ON THESE ITEMS AS
 NEW AND NOT EXISTING. THERE IS INFORMATION NOT YET
 SHOWN TO CONFIRM A COMPLETE REVIEW.
 A) PLEASE SEE 250.94 FOR REQUIRED INTERSYSTEM BOND.
 2008 NEC.
 B) PLEASE INDICATE THE SIZE OF THE EXISTING SERVICE TO
 INCLUDE SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUCTORS. 240.4, 31.16,
 310.15 ETC.
 C) PLEASE COORDINATE PANELS AND RISER. PANELS ARE SHOWN
 RATED AT 150AMPS, YET THE RISER INDICATES PANELS AS
 100AMPS.
 D) PLEASE SEE RISER AS BOTH DISCONNECTS SHOWN FOR BOTH
 UPSTAIRS AND DOWNSTAIRS PANELS ARE RATED AT 200AMPS. IT
 IS NOT PERMITTED TO HAVE 200AMP RATED OVER CURRENT
 PROTECTION FEEDING 100AMP OR 150AMP RATED PANELS.
 E) THE SAME 200AMP RATED DISCONNECTS ARE SHOWN ON
 FEEDERS RATED FOR 100AMPS. THIS IS NOT PERMITTED.
 PLEASE VERIFY MAINS AND OVERCURRENT PROTECTION. 310.16,
 240.4, 310.15B6
  
 3. NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.12 OF THE 2008 NEC AND LIST ALL
 REQUIRED ARC FAULT PROTECTED CIRCUITS. PLEASE SEE SAME
 CODE SECTION UNDER THE 2005 NEC AND LIST ACCORDINGLY.
  
 4. NOTE: PLEASE SEE 406.8 FOR REQUIRED RECEPTACLES
 OUTSIDE IN DAMP OR WET LOCATIONS. 2008 NEC
  
 5. NOTE: PLEASE SEE 250.32, 250.66, 250.50 FOR
 GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM REQUIRED AT DETACHED
 BUILDING.
  
 6. NOTE: PLEASE SEE 250.66 FOR SIZING OF THE GROUNDING
 ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR AT SERVICE. AS THE SERVICE ENTRANCE
 CONDUCTORS AND THE SIZE OF SERVICE ARE NOT SHOWN, THE
 #4 AS SHOWN CANNOT BE CONFIRMED TO BE CODE COMPLIANT.
 BASED ON THE LOAD AND SIZE OF ALL OVER CURRENT
 PROTECTIVE DEVICES SHOWN, THE GROUNDING ELECTRODE IS
 TOO SMALL.
  
 7. NOTE: CLOSET LIGHT FIXTURES SHOWN DO NOT APPEAR TO
 MEET 410.8
  
 8. NOTE: PLANS DO NOT CONTAIN ANY DESIGN PROFESSIONAL
 MEETING 481, 471, 489 OR 481.229, 471.003 EXCEPTIONS
 PLEASE BE SURE PLANS CONTAIN RESPONSIBLE DESIGNER UNDER
 SECTIONS NOTED.
  
 9. NOTE: ALL RECEPTACLES SERVING KITCHEN COUNTER SPACE
 ARE REQUIRED TO BE GFI/GFI PROTECTED. 210.8A6
  
 10. NOTE: OVER CURRENT PROTECTION FOR 5KW AHU IS TOO
 HIGH. 422.11
  
 11. NOTE: LIGHTING FIXTURE REQUIRED IN KITCHEN AND ALSO
 SHOWS LIGHT SWITCH NOT CONTROLLING ANYTHING? 210.70
 NEW OR EXISTING LIGHT FIXTURES IN STAIRS?
 NEW OR EXISTING LIGHT IN SECOND FLOOR BATH?
  
 12. NOTE: MISSING SMOKE ALARM PER 11.5.1, 11.8.3 OF
 NFPA-72 ON LOWER LEVEL OF STAIRS LEADING TO FLOOR
 ABOVE.
  
 13. NOTE: PANEL SCHEDULES NEED TO BE SPECIFIC. FIRST
 FLOOR ONLY INDICATES ONE CIRCUIT FOR GENERAL LIGHTING.
 WHERE ARE THE OTHER GENERAL LIGHTING AND RECEPTACLE
 CIRCUITS? THESE ARE ALSO REQUIRED TO BE SPECIFIC TO
 ROOMS AND AREAS IN WHICH THEY FEED. THE USE OF GENERAL
 LIGHTING AND RECEPTACLES IS NO LONGER ACCEPTACLE UNDER
 THE 2005 AND 2008 NEC. 408.4
  
 14. NOTE: NO ELECTRICAL SHOWN ON PLANS FOR SECOND FLOOR
 WASHER/DRYER? FBC 106.3.5.1.2, 210.52F, 210.11C2
  
 15. NOTE: DISCONNECTS FOR PANELS AT DETACHED STRUCTURE
 ARE SHOWN ON PLANS, HOWEVER NOT ON RISER. 225.31-225.39
  
  
 DEWEY PALMER
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2009-05-15 Cont ID  
Sent By btrobaug Date 2009-05-15 Time 13:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By btrobaug Date 2009-05-15 Time 12:31 Sent To B
Notes
2009-05-15 13:54:51 
  
 TO JULIO'S DESK, NEEDS STATUS ENTERED./WRT.
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2009-02-18 Cont ID  
Sent By btrobaug Date 2009-02-18 Time 14:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By btrobaug Date 2009-02-18 Time 12:12 Sent To P
Notes
2009-02-18 12:51:58 
 APPLICATION #08110405 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
 716 NEW YORK STREET 1/8/09
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL.
  
 THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES:
  
 THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2007 REVISIONS, 2005
 NEC, NFPA-72 2002, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, CHAPTER 1, AND
 FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING:
  
 ALL COMMENTS RELATE TO SHEET 7.1, UNLESS OTHERWISE
 NOTED
  
 THESE COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW NEED FURTHER
 RESPONCE, INDICATED BY ***
  
 1} THE PERSON TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DESIGN MUST
 PRINT AND SIGN THEIR NAME TO SAME PER 106.3.4.3. FBC.
 IF AN ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER, COMPLY WITH 481 AND 471
 FS, RESPECTIVELY*** NOT DONE AND NO RESPONSE GIVEN.
  
 3} PROVIDE A SITE PLAN INDICATING THE LOCATION OF ALL
 SERVICE EQUIPMENT SO THAT COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLES 230
 AND 225 CAN BE REVIEWED*** THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THERE
 ARE NO DISCONNECTS ON THE BACK BUILDING PER
 230.70(A)(1) "READILY ACCESSIBLE LOCATION THE SERVICE
 DISCONNECTING MEANS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT A READILY
 ACCESSIBLE LOCATION EITHER OUTSIDE OF A BUILDING OR
 STRUCTURE OR INSIDE NEAREST THE POINT OF ENTRANCE OF
 THE SERVICE CONDUCTORS". ALSO SEE 250.32 FOR GROUNDING
 OF SEPARATE STRUCTURES. INCLUDE ON THE RISER.
  
 7 } PROVIDE CONDUIT AND CONDUCTOR SIZE AND TYPE FOR THE
 FEEDERS ON THE RISER DIAGRAM.***THIS COMMENT MUST BE
 RESPONDED TOO SO THE COMPLIANCE FOR 250.122,
 310.15(B)(6) CAN BE REVIEWED. THE RESPONSE OF THE
 SERVICE BEING INSTALLED UNDER ANOTHER PERMIT IS ONLY
 PARTIALLY CORRECT AS THAT PERMIT (#06120063) EXPIRED
 WITHOUT HAVING PASSED ANY INSPECTIONS. THE CONDUCTORS
 AND CONDUIT SIZE AND TYPE NEED TO BE VERIFIED AS
 COMPLIANT. INDICATE ON DRAWINGS.
  
 PLEASE REMOVE OLD SHEETS, INSERT NEW ONES, SUBMIT OLD
 SHEETS (ONE SET) TO EXPEDITE REVIEW AND SUBMIT WRITTEN
 RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS MADE IN THIS REVIEW.
  
 IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL.
  
 BILL TROBAUGH
 ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561/805-6718
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2009-01-08 Cont ID  
Sent By btrobaug Date 2009-01-08 Time 16:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By btrobaug Date 2009-01-08 Time 14:34 Sent To P
Notes
2009-01-08 16:31:35 
  
 APPLICATION #08110405 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW
 716 NEW YORK STREET 1/8/09
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL.
  
 THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES:
  
 THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2007 REVISIONS, 2005
 NEC, NFPA-72 2002, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, CHAPTER 1, AND
 FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING:
  
 ALL COMMENTS RELATE TO SHEET 7.1, UNLESS OTHERWISE
 NOTED
  
 1} THE PERSON TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE DESIGN MUST
 PRINT AND SIGN THEIR NAME TO SAME PER 106.3.4.3. FBC.
 IF AN ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER, COMPLY WITH 481 AND 471
 FS, RESPECTIVELY.
  
 2} PER 110.9 AND 110.10: OBTAIN THE AVAILABLE FAULT
 CURRENT AT THE UTILITY AND CALCULATE THE SAME AT THE
 EQUIPMENT. INDICATE THE AIC RATING FOR THE EQUIPMENT IS
 EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THE AVAILABLE FAULT.
  
 3} PROVIDE A SITE PLAN INDICATING THE LOCATION OF ALL
 SERVICE EQUIPMENT SO THAT COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLES 230
 AND 225 CAN BE REVIEWED.
  
 4} PROVIDE LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR THE SERVICE SHOWN
 (INCLUDING THE MAIN HOUSE) PER ARTICLE 220 PART III,
 STANDARD OR PART IV OPTIONAL, INDICATE METHOD USED.
  
 5} THERE ARE TWO RECTANGULAR BOXES IN THE FEED FROM THE
 PANEL TO THE 100 AMP PANELS IN THE BACK BUILDING.
 INDICATE IF THESE ARE EQUIPMENT, AND IF SO WHAT. ADD TO
 ELECTRICAL SYMBOLS LEGEND ALONG WITH AN EXPLANATORY
 NOTE. 215.5 NEC
  
 6} LOCATE ALL PANELS AND DISCONNECTS ON THE FLOOR PLAN
 FOR THE UNITS, THIS SHEET. 215.5 NEC.
  
 7 } PROVIDE CONDUIT AND CONDUCTOR SIZE AND TYPE FOR THE
 FEEDERS ON THE RISER DIAGRAM.
  
 8} THE A/C IS LISTED AS 5 KW IN THE LOAD CALCULATIONS
 BUT SHOWN AS 10 KW IN THE PANEL SCHEDULES, BOTH FLOORS.
 THERE ARE NO MANUFACTURES SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE AIR
 HANDLERS ON SHEET 6.1, PROVIDE SAME SO THE CORRECT
 CALCULATIONS AND PANEL SCHEDULE OCP AND CONDUCTOR SIZES
 MAY BE REVIEWED. 220, 240 NEC. SEE NOTE 16 THIS SHEET.
  
 9} THE BATH CIRCUITS REQUIRED BY 210.11(C)(3) ARE NOT
 LISTED ON THE PANEL SCHEDULE.
  
 10} THERE ARE DISHWASHERS ON THE PANEL SCHEDULES (BOTH)
 THAT ARE NOT SHOWN IN THE UNITS OR LISTED IN THE
 CALCULATIONS. 408.4 NEC.
  
 11} THERE ARE NO SMOKE ALARMS IN THE FIRST FLOOR UNIT.
 313.1.1
  
 IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL.
  
 BILL TROBAUGH
 ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561/805-6718
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop HIST HISTORICAL
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2008-11-19 Cont ID  
Sent By ssherman Date 2008-11-19 Time 11:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ssherman Date 2008-11-19 Time 11:43 Sent To  
Notes
2008-11-19 11:44:02HISTORICAL APPROVAL PER JILLIAN PAPA
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 6 Status N Date 2010-04-30 Cont ID  
Sent By lmartine Date 2010-04-29 Time 12:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmartine Date 2010-04-29 Time 12:22 Sent To  
Notes
2010-04-30 12:23:39GAVE TO BILL, PLANS ARE BEING HAND CARRIED
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date 2009-05-21 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2009-05-21 Time 11:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2009-05-21 Time 11:52 Sent To  
Notes
2009-05-21 11:54:30TO R15
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2009-04-29 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2009-04-29 Time 10:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2009-04-29 Time 10:29 Sent To  
Notes
2009-04-29 10:29:28TO R-20
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2009-02-10 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2009-02-10 Time 09:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2009-02-10 Time 09:37 Sent To Z
Notes
2009-02-10 09:37:26TO "Z" BOX/REV
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2008-12-12 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2008-12-12 Time 10:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2008-12-12 Time 10:34 Sent To E
Notes
2008-12-12 10:35:15TO "SFR" "E"
Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2009-01-14 Cont ID  
Sent By jgomez Date 2009-01-14 Time 13:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jgomez Date 2008-11-21 Time 08:31 Sent To  
Notes
2008-11-21 08:31:58TO "SFR" "Z"
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2010-05-18 Cont ID  
Sent By hmoser Date 2010-05-18 Time 14:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By hmoser Date 2010-05-18 Time 14:17 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2010-03-17 Cont ID  
Sent By pyusko Date 2010-03-17 Time 14:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pyusko Date 2010-03-17 Time 14:44 Sent To  
Notes
2010-03-17 14:49:50MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 M1401.3 - HEATING AND COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS
  
 N1108.0.8 - ALL REPLACED OR RETROFITTED SYSTEMS AND
 COMPONENTS SHALL MEET PRESCRIPTION REQUIREMENTS
 CONTAINED IN METHOD B
  
 LUIS MARTINEZ, 805-6710
Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2009-01-13 Cont ID  
Sent By hmoser Date 2009-01-13 Time 09:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By hmoser Date 2009-01-13 Time 09:46 Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 6 Status P Date 2010-05-18 Cont ID  
Sent By lwagner Date 2010-05-18 Time 10:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lwagner Date 2010-05-18 Time 10:53 Sent To M
Notes
2010-05-18 10:57:28PLUMBING PERMIT REQUIRED
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 5 Status F Date 2010-03-17 Cont ID  
Sent By pyusko Date 2010-03-17 Time 14:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pyusko Date 2010-03-17 Time 14:50 Sent To  
Notes
2010-03-17 15:00:44PLUMBING REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. P3005.6 - PROVIDE CLEANOUT AT BASE OF VERTICAL WASTE
 STACK
  
 2. P2706.2 - STANDPIPE FOR WASHING MACHINE SHALL EXTEND
 A MINIMUM OF 18" AND A MAXIMUM OF 42"
  
 LUIS MARTINEZ, 805-6710
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2009-06-15 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2009-06-15 Time 14:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2009-06-15 Time 14:06 Sent To  
Notes
2009-06-15 14:14:35DENIED
 REFERENCE:
 FBC-2004 W/2007 REVISIONS
 FBC-2004 RESIDENTIAL
 FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1
  
 1. SHT 6.1 (7 OF 9) NOW SUBMITTED HAS A SANITARY RISER
 DIAGRAM THAT DOES NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN, NOR DOES
 IT MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS. AN APPROVED SANITARY RISER
 DIAGRAM IS STILL SHOWN ON SHT 5.1 (5 OF 8). PLEASE
 CLARIFY AND CORRELATE PLANS. SHT C.1 INDICATES 9
 SHEETS, BUT MANY SHEETS ARE INDICATED AS SHEETS # 2, 3,
 4, 5, 6 & 8 OF 8. SECTIONS 106.1 & 106.1.1.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE
 THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY
 PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER
 LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER,
 WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE,
 IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION
 PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND
 WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE
 ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE
 ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE
 COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED.
 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS
 (561) 805-6721
 FAX (561) 805-6731
 E-MAIL [email protected]
  
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2009-05-05 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2009-05-05 Time 10:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2009-05-05 Time 10:45 Sent To  
Notes
2009-05-05 10:48:51PLANS ARE CODE COMPLIANT FOR THE FBC-2004 PLUMBING, BUT
 SHEET C.1 ON BOTH SETS OF PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC
 RECORD ARE PHOTO COPIES AND ARE NOT SEALED. WHEN THE
 SHEETS ARE LEGALLY SIGNED, SEALED & DATED PER FAC
 61G1-15 & FS 481.2055 THEN THE PLUMBING STATUS WILL BE
 CHANGED TO PASSED.
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2009-02-27 Cont ID  
Sent By lwagner Date 2009-02-27 Time 14:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lwagner Date 2009-02-27 Time 14:02 Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2008-12-16 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2008-12-16 Time 14:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2008-12-16 Time 14:13 Sent To E
Notes
2008-12-16 14:36:02DENIED
 REFERENCE:
 FBC-2004 PLUMBING
 FBC-2004 EXISTING BUILDING
 FBC-2004 RESIDENTIAL
 FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1
 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
 FLORIDA STATUTES
  
 1. SHT 3.1 SCOPE OF WORK AND APPLICATION DOES NOT
 INDICATE PLUMBING WORK. PLANS SHOW EXISTING BATHROOMS,
 KITCHENS BUT NOT WASH MACHINES. SUBMITTED ON SHT 5.1 IS
 A SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM. PLEASE CLARIFY. WILL THERE BE
 PLUMBING WORK FOR THIS PERMIT? WILL THERE BE NEW
 FIXTURES, NEW SHOWER PANS, ETC.? SECTION 106.1.1.
 INDICATE THE EXTENT OF PLUMBING WORK IF ANY.
  
 2. ALL SHEETS. THE ADDRESS IN THE TITLE BLOCK OF THE
 ARCHITECT OF RECORD DOES NOT RELECT THE ADDRESS ON THE
 STATE OF FLORIDA DBPR WEBSITE, (2669 FOREST HILL BLVD).
 PLEASE UPDATE THE TITLE BLOCKS ON THE PLANS OR THE
 STATE OF FLORIDA DBPR WEBSITE PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING
 PLANS FOR REVIEW. FAC G1G1-16.004(1) & FS 481.2055.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE
 THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY
 PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER
 LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER,
 WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE,
 IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION
 PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND
 WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE
 ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE
 ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE
 COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED.
 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS
 (561) 805-6721
 FAX (561) 805-6731
 E-MAIL [email protected]
  
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2010-05-11 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2010-05-11 Time 16:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2010-05-11 Time 16:16 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 2009-06-03 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2009-06-03 Time 08:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2009-06-03 Time 08:58 Sent To  
Notes
2009-06-03 09:00:42ZONING PLAN REVIEW
  
 PERMIT NO.: 08110405
 ADDRESS: 716 NEW YORK STREET
 CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: PERUSA CONSULTANT & INVESTMENT
 TELEPHONE NO.: 772.528.9436
 SCOPE OF REVIEW: REMODEL OF INTERIOR/EXTERIOR OF
 ACCESSORY STRUCTURE
  
 REVIEW STATUS: FAILED
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1) THE FOLLOWING COMMENT IS A REPEAT COMMENT THAT WAS
 GENERATED DUE TO REVISIONS THAT WERE MADE ON THE LAST
 SUBMITTAL:
  
 1A) THE MECHANICAL (A/C) EQUIPMENT SHOW FOR THE
 ACCESSORY STRUCTURE DOES NOT MEET SETBACK REQUIREMENTS.
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-305 OF THE CITY'S ZONING AND
 LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
 SHALL ENCROACH NO MORE THAN FOUR (5) FEET INTO A
 REQUIRED SETBACK. AS THE REQUIRED SETBACK IS 12 FEET
 FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE
 LOCATED NO CLOSER THAN EIGHT (8) FEET TO THE REAR
 PROPERTY LINE.
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 PHONE: 561.822.1435
 FAX: 561.822.1459
  
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2009-05-08 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2009-05-08 Time 11:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2009-05-08 Time 11:45 Sent To  
Notes
2009-05-08 11:49:29ZONING PLAN REVIEW
  
 PERMIT NO.: 08110405
 ADDRESS: 716 NEW YORK STREET
 CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: PERUSA CONSULTANT & INVESTMENT
 TELEPHONE NO.: 772.528.9436
 SCOPE OF REVIEW:
  
 REVIEW STATUS: FAILED
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1) THE FOLLOWING COMMENT HAS BEEN GENERATED DUE TO
 REVISIONS THAT WERE MADE SINCE THE LAST SUBMITTAL:
  
 1A) THE MECHANICAL (A/C) EQUIPMENT SHOW FOR THE
 ACCESSORY STRUCTURE DOES NOT MEET SETBACK REQUIREMENTS.
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-305 OF THE CITY'S ZONING AND
 LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
 SHALL ENCROACH NO MORE THAN FOUR (5) FEET INTO A
 REQUIRED SETBACK. AS THE REQUIRED SETBACK IS 12 FEET
 FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE
 LOCATED NO CLOSER THAN EIGHT (8) FEET TO THE REAR
 PROPERTY LINE.
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 PHONE: 561.822.1435
 FAX: 561.822.1459
  
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2009-02-17 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2009-02-17 Time 09:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2009-02-17 Time 09:33 Sent To  
Notes
2009-02-17 09:36:37ZONING PLAN REVIEW
  
 PERMIT NO.: 08110405
 ADDRESS: 716 NEW YORK STREET
 CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: FERUSA CONSULTANT & INVESTMENT
 TELEPHONE NO.: (772) 528-9436
  
 REVIEW STATUS: FAILED
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1) THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS HAVE
 NOT BE ADDRESSED:
  
 1A) TWO (2) COPIES OF A CURRENT/ACCURATE SURVEY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED.
  
 1B) THE VALUE OF THE PROPOSED WORK ($35,000) IN
 ADDITION TO THE VALUE OF WORK ALREADY COMPLETED
 ($26,313.31 ACCORDING TO DOCUMATION PROVIDED BY THE
 PROPERTY OWNER), EXCEEDS 50% OF THE VALUE OF THE
 STRUCTURE ($100,677.51 ACCORDING TO AN APPRAISAL
 PROVIDED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER). PURSUANT TO SECTION
 94-513(B)(1)(D) OF THE CITY'S ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, NONCONFORMING USES WITH NO
 ADVERSE IMPACTS MAY ONLY BE REPAIRED OR ALTERED SO LONG
 AS THE COSTS INCURRED DO NOT EXCEED 50% OF THE ACCESSED
 VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE WITHIN ANY 12-MONTH PERIOD.
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER,
 AT (561) 822-1435.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2008-12-11 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 2008-12-11 Time 17:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 2008-12-11 Time 17:43 Sent To  
Notes
2008-12-11 17:55:41ZONING PLAN REVIEW
  
 PERMIT NO.: 08110405
 ADDRESS: 716 NEW YORK STREET
 CONTRACTOR/CONTACT: FERUSA CONSULTANT & INVESTMENT
 TELEPHONE NO.: (772) 871-0175
  
 REVIEW STATUS: FAILED
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1) TWO (2) COPIES OF A CURRENT/ACCURATE SURVEY SHALL BE
 PROVIDED.
  
 2) PURSUANT TO THE FINAL ORDER ISSUED IN ZBA CASE NO.
 3232, THE FOLLOWING ITEMS HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED:
  
 2A) A SIX (6) FOOT FENCE SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE
 EAST PROPERTY LINE, IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE
 ACCESSORY STRUCTURE.
  
 2B) LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED TO SCREEN THE DECK
 FROM THE IMMEDIATE ADJOINING NEIGHBOR.
  
 2C) SHIELDING SHALL BE PROVIDED OF ANY LIGHT UPON THE
 IMMEDIATE ADJOINGING NEIGHBOR.
  
 3) THE SCOPE OF WORK NOTED ON THE PLANS CONTINUE TO
 PROVIDE AN EXPANSION OF ONE (1) FOOT SIX (6) INCHES TO
 ACCOMMODATE THE STAIRS. PURSUANT TO THE FINAL ORDER IN
 ZBA CASE NO. 3232, THE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE MAY NOT BE
 ENLARGED IN ANY MANNER.
  
 4) THE VALUE OF THE PROPOSED WORK ($35,000) IN ADDITION
 TO THE VALUE OF WORK ALREADY COMPLETED ($26,313.31
 ACCORDING TO DOCUMATION PROVIDED BY THE PROPERTY
 OWNER), EXCEEDS 50% OF THE VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE
 ($100,677.51 ACCORDING TO AN APPRAISAL PROVIDED BY THE
 PROPERTY OWNER). PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-513(B)(1)(D) OF
 THE CITY'S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS,
 NONCONFORMING USES WITH NO ADVERSE IMPACTS MAY ONLY BE
 REPAIRED OR ALTERED SO LONG AS THE COSTS INCURRED DO
 NOT EXCEED 50% OF THE ACCESSED VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE
 WITHIN ANY 12-MONTH PERIOD.
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER,
 AT (561) 822-1435.
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved