Plan Review Stops For Permit 08110263 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
Time |
07:44 |
Rev Time |
0.55 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
Time |
07:44 |
Sent To |
FIRE |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-02-03 |
Time |
10:12 |
Rev Time |
1.77 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-02-03 |
Time |
10:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-02-03 10:18:48 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 08110263 | | ADD: 4631 N CONGRESS AV | | CONT: "PLAN REVIEW/ | | TEL: (561)635-6935/ NAT HEALY | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | TUESDAY FEB.03/2009 | | 2ND REVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | 1A) INFORMATIONAL: WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE | | INDICATE THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS | | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL | | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE | | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO | | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED | | COOPERATION. | | | | 1B) FL S S 713.13 NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED | | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT. NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE | | WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS NOT | | ACTUALLY COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING | | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) | | THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE | | CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. | | | | 2) NEW COMMENT DOOR 102 IT APPEARS THE DIMENSION OF | | 1'-0" IS MISLABELED, IT APPEARS TO BE THE CORRECT 1'-6" | | REQUIRED BY 11-4.13.6. NOTE THE FIRE EXTINGUISHER | | LOCATED NEXT TO THE DOOR MAY CAUSE AN ISSUE IF GREATER | | THAN 4" AWAY FROM THE WALL. 11-4.4 PROTRUDING OBJECTS. | | | | 3) NEW COMMENT, DOOR # 113TO THE DATA CLOSET IS NOT IN | | COMPLIANCE WITH: 1008.1.8.8 DURING ITS SWING, ANY DOOR | | IN A MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL LEAVE UNOBSTRUCTED AT LEAST | | ONE HALF OF THE REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, CORRIDOR, | | PASSAGEWAY, OR LANDING, NOR PROJECT MORE THAN 7 INCHES | | (178 MM) INTO THE REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, CORRIDOR, | | PASSAGEWAY OR LANDING, WHEN FULLY OPEN. | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | MEMBER OF BOAF, THE BUILDING OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION OF | | FLORIDA: PROTECTING LIVES AND PROPERTY SINCE 1953. | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | LAW. UNDER FLORIDA STATE STATUTE SB 80, E-MAIL | | ADDRESSES ARE PUBLIC RECORDS.WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO | | OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE | | PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. | | YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE THEREFORE SUBJECT TO | | PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-12-10 |
Time |
07:21 |
Rev Time |
2.22 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-12-10 |
Time |
07:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-12-10 07:49:40 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 08110263 | | ADD: 4631 N CONGRESS AV | | CONT: "PLAN REVIEW/ | | TEL: (561)635-6935/ NAT HEALY | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | REVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | 1A) INFORMATIONAL: WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE | | INDICATE THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS | | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL | | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE | | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO | | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED | | COOPERATION. | | 1B) FL S S 713.13 NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED | | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT. NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE | | WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS NOT | | ACTUALLY COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING | | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) | | THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE | | CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. | | | | 1C) : PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT (FIRST TIME REVIEW) | | AFTER JULY 1ST, 2007 SHALL BE REVIEWED TO THE 2004 FBC | | BUILDING WITH THE 2007 SUPPLEMENTS NOT INCLUDING ALL | | AMENDMENTS. | | | | 2) ENERGY CALCULATIONS PLEASE REVIEW 13-400.0.C.4 | | RENOVATED BUILDINGS. | | RENOVATED BUILDINGS SHALL, WHEN APPLICABLE (SEE SECTION | | 202), MEET THE EFFICIENCIES LISTED ON FORM 400C FOR | | COMPONENTS BEING CHANGED OR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE | | ENVELOPE OR SYSTEMS CRITERIA IN METHOD B OF FLA/COM FOR | | THE COMPONENTS BEING CHANGED. EXISTING BUILDINGS NOT | | MEETING THE DEFINITION OF A RENOVATION IN WHICH NEW | | HEATING, COOLING, WATER HEATING, ELECTRICAL OR LIGHTING | | SYSTEMS ARE INSTALLED SHALL MEET THE BASIC PRESCRIPTIVE | | MINIMUM EFFICIENCIES LISTED IN THIS CODE FOR THE | | SYSTEM(S) BEING CHANGED. | | | | RENOVATION. ANY STRUCTURAL REPAIR, RECONSTRUCTION OR | | RESTORATION TO A STRUCTURE, THE COSTS OF WHICH EQUALS | | OR EXCEEDS, OVER A ONE-YEAR PERIOD, A CUMULATIVE TOTAL | | OF 30 PERCENT OF THE ASSESSED VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE | | WHEN THAT VALUE IS ASSESSED, EITHER: | | 1. BEFORE THE IMPROVEMENT OR REPAIR IS STARTED; OR | | 2. BEFORE THE DAMAGE OCCURRED, IF THE STRUCTURE HAS | | BEEN DAMAGED. | | FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS CODE, RENOVATION OCCURS WHEN | | THE FIRST ALTERATION OF ANY WALL, CEILING, FLOOR, OR | | OTHER STRUCTURAL PART OR MECHANICAL SYSTEM OF THE | | BUILDING COMMENCES, WHETHER OR NOT THAT ALTERATION | | AFFECTS THE EXTERNAL DIMENSIONS OF THE STRUCTURE. | | | | WITH THIS ONLY BEING A PLAN REVIEW AND NOT A PERMIT | | APPLICATION IT APPEARS THE WORK TO BE COVERED UNDER | | THIS PERMIT WILL NOT MEET THE 30% OF THE VALUE OF THE | | BUILDING, REQUIRING FORM 400 C, ONCE THE VALUE IS KNOWN | | WE WILL HAVE THE CRITERIA TO ASSESS WHICH METHOD B OR C | | SHOULD HAVE BEEN USED. | | | | 3) SHEET A-1 DOES NOT INDICATE WHAT AREAS ARE ALREADY | | THERE AND WHAT IS TO BE CONSIDERED NEW WORK. ADDITIONAL | | INFORMATION REQUIRED 106.1.2. | | | | 4) SHEET A-3 DETAIL 4 & 5 BOTH INDICATE SOFFIT DETAILS | | BUT DO NOT PROVIDE WHAT TYPE OF ATTACHMENT METHOD WILL | | BE USED TO INSTALL SOFFITS TO DECK ABOVE? 2508.1, TABLE | | 2508.1 & GA-216. | | | | 5) SHEET A-4 INDICATES WALL ASSEMBLIES FOR RATED WALLS | | BUT DOES NOT PROVIDE FLOOR PENETRATIONS FOR HORIZONTAL | | ASSEMBLIES. 712.4.1.2. | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-03-02 |
Time |
17:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-03-02 |
Time |
17:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-03-02 17:24:35 | *** REDLINED PLANS*** | | | | *NOTE: E-1 WAS REVISED FOR HEIGHTS OF DEVICES FOR ADA | | COMPLIANCE ALONG WITH PULL STATIONS HOWEVER THE MINIMUM | | CANDELA LEVELS AS NOTED IN PREVIOUS REVIEWS WERE NOT | | INDICATED. | | THE MINIMUM CD LEVEL IS 75 PER FBC 11-4.28.3(4). | | REDLINED ON SHEET E-1. PLANS STAMPED OK. | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-02-09 |
Time |
17:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-02-09 |
Time |
17:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-02-09 17:15:03 | ** DENIED ** | | | | ** PLANS ARE COMING BACK FOR SOME OTHER COMMENTS. | | PLEASE SEE COMMENT BELOW. | | | | 1) NOTE: ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW A REQUEST FOR ANY HORN | | AND STROBE DEVICES NEED TO BE SHOWN ON PLANS. DEVICES | | HEIGHTS AND LEVELS NEED TO BE SHOWN ON PLANS. | | RESPONSE MENTIONS THIS WILL BE UNDER SEPARATE PERMITS | | HOWEVER ANY REQUIRED SYSTEMS PER FS 633 MUST BE SHOWN | | ON BASE BUILDING PLANS FOR BASE CODE COMPLIANCE. | | ANY SEPARATE PERMITS WILL ALSO BE DONE AT A LATER DATE. | | CALLED ARCHITECT TO CLARIFY. | | FBC 11-4.28.1, .2 AND .3. | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-12-03 |
Time |
08:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-12-03 |
Time |
08:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-12-03 08:40:59 | | | ** DENIED REVIEW** | | | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PLAN REVIEW ONLY. EVEN | | ONCE ALL ITEMS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE ARE MET AND PERMIT | | APPLICATION HAS NOT BEEN MADE REVIEW WILL REMAIN IN | | FAILED STATUS. ITEMS SUCH AS LICENSING, CODES ETC ARE | | REVIEWED AT TIME OF APPLICATION. | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE THE RELEVANT CODES ARE | | ADJUSTED. CODES ON THE COVER SHEET COMPARED TO | | ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR EXAMPLES ARE NOT THE SAME. | | PLEASE SEE COVER SHEET WHICH SHOULD REFLECT 2004 FBC W/ | | 2007 REVISIONS. | | PLEASE SEE COVER SHEET WHICH SHOULD REFLECT THE 2005 | | NFPA-70 (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE) PLANS SHOW 2002. | | LIFE SAFETY SHEET DOES CONTAIN THE CORRECT 2005 NEC | | HOWEVER ELECTRICAL PLANS STATE *LATEST*. | | PLEASE ADJUST ALL SHEETS AS APPLICABLE. | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 13-101.1.3 AND SECTION 202 FOR | | DEFINITIONS. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW FLA-COM FORM *B* BE | | USED. PLEASE KNOW BASED ON DEFINITIONS, PLANS | | SUBMITTED, NO PERMIT APPLICATION FOR VALUE THE METHOD | | *B* MAY NOT BE USED. | | PLEASE SEE 13-400.C FOR EXAMPLE WHICH MENTIONS WHEN NOT | | MEETING THE DEFINITION OF A RENOVATED BUILDING, BASIC | | PRESCRIPTIVE REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET. | | PLEASE SUBMIT LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS PER | | TABLES 13-415.2.B, OR 13-415.2.C. PLEASE CALL TO GO | | OVER AS SOME INFORMATION ON E3 IS SHOWN. | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 11-4.27.4 AS THE TIMER TYPE | | DEVICES AS SHOWN ARE NOT PERMITTED TO BE THE TYPE WHICH | | WOULD REQUIRE TWISTING ACTION ETC. PLEASE SEE SECTION | | GIVEN AS ALL CONTROLS FOR LIGHTING ETC NEED TO MEET ADA | | REQUIREMENTS. | | PLEASE ADJUST NOTES AND SPECIFICS FOR DEVICES. | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE WALL/FLOOR PENETRATION DETAILS | | FOR LISTED WALL ASSEMBLIES. 300.21. PLEASE SEE | | COMMENTARY IN NEC HANDBOOK WHICH WILL REFERENCE | | ACCEPTABLE STANDARDS. | | IF THE SAME DETAILS ON A4 ARE TO BE USED PLEASE MAKE | | NOTE ON ELECTRICAL PLANS REFERENCING TO THIS SHEET. | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY THE SECTION ON E3 SHOWN AS | | *DEMAND LOAD* WHICH SHOWS EXISTING FEEDERS AS 4- | | 500MCM. WHAT FEEDERS ARE THESE AS THE NEW FEEDERS ON | | RISER FROM GUTTER ARE NOT THE SAME. | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE NOTE A *FLOATING NEUTRAL KIT* REQUIRED | | AT THE TENANT METER. 250.6,250.24 ETC. | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SHOW ANY NEW OR EXISTING FIRE ALARM | | DEVICES. PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE FBC 11-4.28.1,.2 AND .3 | | FOR MINIMUM LEVELS FOR ADA COMPLIANCE. | | (IF APPLICABLE IN THIS BUILDING). | | | | | | | | | | | | **IMPORTANT** | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED | | INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
Time |
13:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2009-03-04 |
Time |
13:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-03-04 13:30:49 | ***PROVISO*** | | | | SWING OF THE DOOR TO THE DATA ROOM WAS CORRECTED ON | | A-SHEETS ONLY. |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2009-02-18 |
Time |
12:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2009-02-18 |
Time |
12:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-02-18 12:37:46 | ***DENIED*** | | | | | | 1) THE DOOR TO DATA ROOM 113 SEEMS TO EXTEND GREATER | | THAN 1/2 THE WIDTH OF THE CORRIDOR. SEE NFPA 101, | | SEC.7.2.1.4.4. | | | | | | PLANS WILL REMAIN IN FAILED STATUS UNTIL SUBMITTED AND | | APPROVED FOR PERMIT REVIEW. | | | | | | MIKE WENNERGREN, ASST. FIRE MARSHAL | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | FIRE PREVENTION (561) 804-4756 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-12-11 |
Time |
13:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-12-11 |
Time |
13:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-12-11 14:04:35 | PLANS APPEAR TO BE CODE COMPLIANT HOWEVER PLEASE SEE | | THE FOLLOWING: | | | | 1) TITLE SHEET INDICATES THAT PROJECT IS PROTECTED BY | | AN AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM. WHEN PLANS ARE | | SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT REVIEW, PLEASE SHOW THE FIRE | | SPRINKLER LAYOUT. THIS CAN BE ILLUSTRATED ON THE | | REFLECTED CEILING PLAN. IN ADDITION, SEPARATE SHOP | | DRAWINGS AND PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR FIRE SPRINKLER | | REMODEL. | | | | 2) THE DOOR TO DATA ROOM 113 SEEMS TO EXTEND GREATER | | THAN 1/2 THE WIDTH OF THE CORRIDOR. SEE NFPA 101, | | SEC.7.2.1.4.4. | | | | | | PLANS WILL REMAIN IN FAILED STATUS UNTIL SUBMITTED AND | | APPROVED FOR PERMIT REVIEW. | | | | | | MIKE WENNERGREN, ASST. FIRE MARSHAL | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | FIRE PREVENTION (561) 804-4756 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-03-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-03-02 |
Time |
16:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-03-02 |
Time |
16:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-03-02 16:34:27 | TO "BOB"#12 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-01-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-01-21 |
Time |
16:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-01-21 |
Time |
16:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-01-21 16:22:48 | TO "COMM" BD#14 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-12-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-12-18 |
Time |
10:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-11-14 |
Time |
13:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-11-14 14:00:31 | TO "COMM" BD#57 |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-02-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-02-20 |
Time |
09:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-02-20 |
Time |
09:43 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-12-06 |
Time |
12:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-12-06 |
Time |
12:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-12-06 12:52:03 | REVIEW #: 1ST **PLAN CHECK ONLY** | | ACTION: P/F | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE AND PASSED. | | HOWEVER, PLANS HAVE ONLY BEEN SUBMITTED FOR PLAN | | REVIEW. NO PERMIT APPLICATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED. PLANS | | WILL REMIAN IN FAILED STATUS PENDING SUBMISSION OF | | PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | NOTE: ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE NOT REVIEWED FOR CODE | | COMPLIANCE. IT IS NOT CLEAR AT THIS TIME WHETHER THIS | | WORK QUALIFIES AS A "RENOVATION" AS DEFINED IN FBCB | | 13-202. IF THIS PROJECT IS NOT A RENOVATION UNDER THIS | | DEFINITION, SEE FBCB 13-101.6 BELOW FOR MINIMUM | | REQUIREMENTS. ENOUGH INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED ON | | PLANS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS | | OF FBCB 13-101.6. THEREFORE, NO ENERGY OR COOLING LOAD | | CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED. | | | | 13-101.6 BUILDING SYSTEMS. | | THERMAL EFFICIENCY STANDARDS ARE SET FOR THE FOLLOWING | | BUILDING SYSTEMS WHERE NEW PRODUCTS ARE INSTALLED OR | | REPLACED IN EXISTING BUILDINGS, AND FOR WHICH A PERMIT | | MUST BE OBTAINED. SUCH SYSTEMS SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM | | EFFICIENCIES ALLOWED FOR THAT SYSTEM ON FORM 400C FOR | | COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS AND ON FORM 600C FOR RESIDENTIAL | | BUILDINGS. | | 1. HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS; | | 2. SERVICE WATER OR POOL HEATING SYSTEMS; | | 3. ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS AND MOTORS; | | 4. LIGHTING SYSTEMS. | | EXCEPTIONS: | | 1. WHERE PART OF A FUNCTIONAL UNIT IS REPAIRED OR | | REPLACED. FOR EXAMPLE, REPLACEMENT OF AN ENTIRE HVAC | | SYSTEM IS NOT REQUIRED BECAUSE A NEW COMPRESSOR OR | | OTHER PART DOES NOT MEET CODE WHEN INSTALLED WITH AN | | OLDER SYSTEM. | | 2. WHERE EXISTING COMPONENTS ARE UTILIZED WITH A | | REPLACEMENT SYSTEM, SUCH AS AIR DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM | | DUCTS OR ELECTRICAL WIRING FOR LIGHTS, SUCH COMPONENTS | | OR CONTROLS NEED NOT MEET CODE IF MEETING CODE WOULD | | REQUIRE THAT COMPONENT?S REPLACEMENT. | | 3. REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT THAT WOULD REQUIRE EXTENSIVE | | REVISIONS TO OTHER SYSTEMS, EQUIPMENT OR ELEMENTS OF A | | BUILDING WHERE SUCH REPLACEMENT IS A LIKE-FOR-LIKE | | REPLACEMENT, SUCH AS THROUGH-THE-WALL CONDENSING UNITS | | AND PTACS, CHILLERS, AND COOLING TOWERS IN CONFINED | | SPACES. | | 4. HVAC EQUIPMENT SIZING CALCULATIONS ARE NOT REQUIRED | | FOR SYSTEMS INSTALLED IN EXISTING BUILDINGS NOT MEETING | | THE DEFINITION OF RENOVATION IN SECTION 202. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | 561.805.6719 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-02 |
Time |
18:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-02 |
Time |
18:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-02-20 |
Time |
10:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-02-20 |
Time |
10:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-02-20 10:29:41 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: | | FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | | PLAN REVIEW ONLY: | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | 1. OK | | | | 2. SHT A.5 SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 11-4.24.3 KNEE | | CLEARANCE (27" REQD), AND 11-4.24.6 EXPOSED PIPES & | | SURFACES. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT SECTION 1-4.24.6 NOT ADDRESSED. | | | | 3. SHT P.1 THE SANITARY AND TRAP ARE NOT SHOWN AT THE | | SINK IN ROOM 121. PLEASE CLARIFY SECTIONS 106.1.1, | | 701.1 & 1002.1. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED. PIPING | | AND TRAP STILL NOT SHOWN AT THE SINK. THE PIPING AND | | TRAP ARE SHOWN OUTSIDE THE CABINET. | | | | 4. OK | | 5. OK | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-12-18 |
Time |
09:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-12-17 |
Time |
16:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-12-18 10:19:51 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: | | FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | FBC-2004 BUILDING | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | | PLAN REVIEW ONLY: | | | | 1. SHT A.3 SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 11-4.16.5 FLUSH | | CONTROLS. | | | | 2. SHT A.5 SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 11-4.24.3 KNEE | | CLEARANCE (27" REQD), AND 11-4.24.6 EXPOSED PIPES & | | SURFACES. | | | | 3. SHT P.1 THE SANITARY AND TRAP ARE NOT SHOWN AT THE | | SINK IN ROOM 121. PLEASE CLARIFY SECTIONS 106.1.1, | | 701.1 & 1002.1. | | | | 4. SHTS T.1 & LS.1 PLEASE INDICATE 2007 REVISIONS WITH | | THE FBC-2004 IN THE CODE SUMMARY. | | | | 5. SHT P.3 PLEASE INDICATE THE REQUIRED INSULATION FOR | | THE HOT WATER PIPING WITH A NOTE ON THE WATER RISER | | DIAGRAM AS INDICATED IN THE INPUT DATA REPORT SHT 9 FOR | | THE PIPING. CHAPTER 13. | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-01-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2009-01-27 |
Time |
14:32 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2009-01-27 |
Time |
14:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-01-27 14:33:31 | INTERIOR WORK ONLY. | | | | IF WORK EXCEEDS 50% OF THE VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE, THEN | | A LANDSCAPE PLAN IS REQUIRED. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-11-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-11-19 |
Time |
11:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-11-19 |
Time |
11:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-11-19 11:56:19 | PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE FINAL PERMIT VALUE EXCEEDS 50% | | OF THE ASSESSED VALUE OF THE BUILDING, THEN A LANDSCAPE | | PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE LANDSCAPE CODE IS | | REQUIRED. | | | | OTHERWISE, COMPLIES WITH ZONING REQ. | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1435. |
|
|