|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 08100254
Plan Review Stops For Permit 08100254 |
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-10-29 |
Time |
10:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-10-29 |
Time |
09:50 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-10-14 |
Time |
16:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-10-14 |
Time |
13:38 |
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
2008-10-14 16:15:05 | | | | | THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES: | | | | THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2007 REVISIONS, 2005 | | NEC, NFPA-72 2002, NFPA-101 2003, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, | | CHAPTER 1.AND FOUND NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING | | | | :1} THE AIC RATING OF THE EQUIPMENT BEING SET MUST BE | | THE SAME AS THE AIC RATING OF THE EQUIPMENT FEEDING IT. | | | | 2} PROVIDE A RISER DIAGRAM AS IT CANNOT BE DETERMINED | | EXACTLY HOW THE ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS OCCUR FROM THE | | PICTURES SUBMITTED.RE: HOW IS THE METER FED AND FROM | | WHERE, INDICATE THE GEC WHICH SHOULD PROBABLY BE TIED | | TO THE EXISTING SYSTEM DEPENDING AGAIN ON THE FEED, | | THERE SHOULD BE NO EQUIPMENT GROUND RAN TO THE FIRST | | MEANS FROM THE METER UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONS. THE RISER | | DIAGRAM WILL CLARIFY THESE COMMENTS. | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561/805-6718 | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-10-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-10-14 |
Time |
16:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-10-14 |
Time |
13:38 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |
 |