| 2008-12-17 16:37:33 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6724 [email protected] |
| | |
| | FBC FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 |
| | FBC EB FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING |
| | CODE |
| | FBC R FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL |
| | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 |
| | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE |
| | FS FLORIDA STATUTE |
| | |
| | FROM PREVIOUS LIST: |
| | |
| | 1. USE OF REMOVABLE IMPACT PROTECTION ON COMMERCIAL |
| | BUILDINGS IS TO BE APPROVED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL |
| | THROUGH A PRESTORM PREPARATION PLAN; SEE WIND-BORNE |
| | DEBRIS IMPLEMENTATION STANDARD, ITEM 13. IMPACT ON THE |
| | SECOND FLOOR IS GENERALLY REQUIRED. HTTP://WWW.CITYOFWP |
| | B.COM/CONSTRUCTION/PDF/WIND-BORNE_DEBRIS_IMPLEMETATION. |
| | PDF |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW - A PRESTORM PREPARATION PLAN WAS SUBMITTED. |
| | PLEASE REVISE AS FOLLOWS: |
| | |
| | A. THE PLAN IS TO BE SIGNED BY THE OWNER. |
| | |
| | B. THE PLAN STATES THAT THIS IS A SINGLE FAMILY |
| | RESIDENCE. A SITE VISIT HAS BEEN DONE; THERE ARE FOUR |
| | ELECTRIC SERVICES TO THIS ADDRESS. THIS APPEARS TO BE |
| | MULTI FAMILY, CONSISTENT WITH PAPA RECORDS. PLEASE |
| | REVISE OR CONTACT ME TO RESOLVE THIS INCONSISTENCY. |
| | |
| | C. THE PLAN STATES THAT THE SHUTTERS WILL BE INSTALLED |
| | BY THE OWNER, HER HUSBAND, AND "ANY OTHERS THEY DEEM |
| | NECESSARY". PROVIDE CONTRACTS OR OTHER DOCUMENTATION |
| | FOR THE OTHER INDIVIDUALS. PROVISIONS MUST BE MADE IN |
| | THE EVENT THAT THE OWNER IS ON VACATION, ILL, OR |
| | OTHERWISE UNABLE TO DO THE INSTALLATION. |
| | |
| | D. WHO HAS ACCESS TO THE GARAGE WHERE THE SHUTTERS WILL |
| | BE STORED? HOW WILL THEY BE SECURED FROM THEFT? |
| | |
| | E. THE PLAN STATES THAT SHUTTESR WILL BE INSTALLED |
| | "UPON NOTIFICATION OF AN APPROACHING HURRICANE". THERE |
| | IS VERY SPECIFIC LANGUAGE IN ITEM #13 REGARDING |
| | INSTALLATION; THE OWNER MUST AGREE TO INSTALL THE |
| | SHUTTERS WITHIN OR EXCEEDING THESE PARAMETERS. |
| | |
| | F. THE PLAN SUBMITTED STATES THAT SHUTTERS WILL BE |
| | INSTALLED ON THE SECOND FLOOR. PER CONTRACTOR |
| | INFORMATION, PLEASE REVISE THIS AS IT IS MY |
| | UNDERSTANDING THAT IMPACT WILL BE INSTALLED ON THE |
| | SECOND FLOOR. |
| | |
| | THE PLAN CAN BE SUBMITTED FOR PRELIMINARY REVIEW VIA |
| | EMAIL, [email protected]. |
| | |
| | 2. IF USE OF REMOVABLE STORM PANELS IS APPROVED, AN |
| | INSTALLATION SCHEDULE IS REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC R301 (WIND). TWO SETS REQUIRED. HTT |
| | P://WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/CONSTRUCTION/PDF/SCHEDULE_FOR_INS |
| | TALLATION.PDF |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, PLEASE REVISE THE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE AS |
| | SHUTTERS WILL BE INSTALLED ON THE FIRST FLOOR ONLY. |
| | |
| | 3. ELECTRIC PERMIT REQUIRED. THIS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO |
| | ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 4. THE PERMIT APPLICATION SCOPE INCLUDES REPAIR OF A |
| | STAIRWAY. PLEASE NOTE LOCATION AND SCOPE (2 PLANKS PER |
| | CONTRACTOR) ON THE FLOOR PLAN SO THAT THIS ALTERATION |
| | CAN BE INCLUDED IN THIS PERMIT PACKAGE. FIRST REVIEW |
| | REQUESTED A DETAIL; DUE TO LIMITED SCOPE THIS WILL NOT |
| | BE REQUIRED BUT THE PLAN NEEDS TO BE REVISED TO NOTE |
| | THE WORK PROPOSED AS WELL AS THE LIMITATION IN SCOPE. |
| | |
| | 5. DECLARE GOVERNING CODE, INCLUDING 2007 |
| | REVISIONS/SUPPLEMENTS. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER STATES "SEE ATTACHED |
| | LETTER". NO LETTER ATTACHED, BUT THIS NEEDS TO BE |
| | INCORPORATED INTO THE ENGINEER'S PLAN. PLEASE REVISE. |
| | |
| | 6. DECLARE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA, FBC R301. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER STATES 'SEE ATTACHED |
| | DOCUMENT". THIS NEEDS TO BE INCORPORATED INTO THE |
| | ENGINEER'S DESIGN. THE WIND LOAD CHARTS PROVIDED WERE |
| | PREPARED BY A DIFFERENT ENGINEER. THE ENGINEER WHO |
| | PREPARED THE DRAWINGS IS REQUIRED TO STATE HIS WIND |
| | DESIGN CRITERIA FBC R301. |
| | |
| | 7. DECLARE LEVEL OF ALTERATION FBC EB 301.5. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER ANSWERED THE QUESTION BUT |
| | THIS NEEDS TO BE INCORPORATED INTO THE PLAN. RESPONSE |
| | LETTERS ARE USEFUL IN EXPEDITING PLAN REVIEW BUT DO NOT |
| | IN THEMSELVES SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE AS THEY ARE NOT A |
| | PART OF THE PERMIT PACKAGE. |
| | |
| | 8. STRUCTURAL DETAILS PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER WERE |
| | SUBMITTED. THIS IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE SCOPE OF WORK ON |
| | THE APPLICATION. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY THESE DETAILS HAVE |
| | BEEN PROVIDED. THE DETAIL STATES THAT THE 2X4 IS "AS |
| | NEEDED FOR REINFOCEMENT". REINFORCEMENT - STRUCTURAL |
| | FOR THE WALL, OR BLOCKING FOR THE DRYWALL? THE |
| | APPLICATION STATES "REPAIR SHEETROCK FOR UPDATED |
| | ELECTRICAL". CLARIFY EXTENT OF DRYWALL REPAIR. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVISE PLAN TO ADDRESS THE COMMENT. |
| | |
| | 9. INSULATION IS NOT SHOWN, WALL AND TENANT SEPARATION |
| | (FLOOR/CEILING), FBC13. AS SCOPE IS NOT CLEAR, |
| | COMPLIANCE AND REQUIREMENTS NOT CLEAR AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, PLEASE SUBMIT PLANS TO SHOW SCOPE OF WORK |
| | FBC*106. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
