Plan Review Stops For Permit 08090247 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-12-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-12-16 |
Time |
14:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-12-16 |
Time |
13:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-12-16 13:45:29 | MASTER:08090247 | | REVISION: 09120104 | | | | REVISION# 5 11-02-09 THE REMOVAL OF THE 2ND STORY | | BUILD-OUT FROM SCOPE OF PERMIT. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-10-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-10-28 |
Time |
16:15 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-10-28 |
Time |
16:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-10-28 16:26:03 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 08090247 | | ADD: 501 N ROSEMARY AVE | | CONT: NUJAK DEVELOPMENT | | TEL: (863)686-1565 | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | REVISION REVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | OCT. 28/2009 | | | | LETTER OF OCT 21/2009 IN REGARDS TO FOAM PLASTIC WALL | | INSULATION, PLEASE REFER TO SECTION : | | 2004 FBC- BUILDING 2603.5.2 THERMAL BARRIER. | | ANY FOAM PLASTIC INSULATION SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM THE | | BUILDING INTERIOR BY A THERMAL BARRIER MEETING THE | | PROVISIONS OF SECTION 2603.4, UNLESS SPECIAL APPROVAL | | IS OBTAINED ON THE BASIS OF SECTION 2603.8. | | | | | | PLEASE REVIEW THE MECHANICAL PLANS THE AREA ABOVE THE | | CEILING IS CONSIDERED A PLENUM: | | 2004 FBC MECHANICAL 602.2.1 MATERIALS EXPOSED WITHIN | | PLENUMS. | | EXCEPT AS REQUIRED BY SECTIONS 602.2.1.1 THROUGH | | 602.2.1.5, MATERIALS EXPOSED WITHIN PLENUMS SHALL BE | | NONCOMBUSTIBLE OR SHALL HAVE A FLAME SPREAD INDEX OF | | NOT MORE THAN 25 AND A SMOKE-DEVELOPED INDEX OF NOT | | MORE THAN 50 WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 84. | | | | 2004 MECHANICAL 602.2.1.5 FOAM PLASTIC INSULATION. | | FOAM PLASTIC INSULATION USED AS WALL OR CEILING FINISH | | IN PLENUMS SHALL EXHIBIT A FLAME SPREAD INDEX OF 75 OR | | LESS AND A SMOKE-DEVELOPED INDEX OF 450 OR LESS WHEN | | TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 84 AND SHALL ALSO | | COMPLY WITH SECTION 602.2.1.5.1, 602.2.1.5.2 OR | | 602.2.1.5.3. | | 602.2.1.5.1 SEPARATION REQUIRED. | | THE FOAM PLASTIC INSULATION SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM THE | | PLENUM BY A THERMAL BARRIER COMPLYING WITH SECTION | | 2603.4 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. | | 602.2.1.5.2 APPROVAL. | | THE FOAM PLASTIC INSULATION SHALL BE APPROVED BASED ON | | TESTS CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 2603.8 OF | | THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING . | | 602.2.1.5.3 COVERING. | | THE FOAM PLASTIC INSULATION SHALL BE COVERED BY | | CORROSION-RESISTANT STEEL HAVING A BASE METAL THICKNESS | | OF NOT LESS THAN 0.0160 INCH (0.4 MM). | | | | 2004 MECANICAL 603.8 CAVITIES OF THE BUILDING | | STRUCTURE. | | CAVITIES IN FRAMED SPACES, SUCH AS DROPPED SOFFITS AND | | WALLS, SHALL NOT BE USED TO DELIVER AIR FROM OR RETURN | | AIR TO THE CONDITIONING SYSTEM UNLESS THEY CONTAIN AN | | AIR DUCT INSERT WHICH IS INSULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | TABLE 13-410.1.ABC.2.2 OR TABLE 13-610.1.ABC.2.1 OF | | CHAPTER 13 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING AND | | CONSTRUCTED AND SEALED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 603.1 APPROPRIATE FOR THE DUCT | | MATERIALS USED. | | EXCEPTION: RETURN AIR PLENUMS. | | CAVITIES DESIGNED FOR AIR TRANSPORT SUCH AS MECHANICAL | | CLOSETS, CHASES, AIR SHAFTS, ETC. SHALL BE LINED WITH | | AN AIR BARRIER AND SEALED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION | | 603.9 AND SHALL BE INSULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE | | 13-410.1.ABC.2.2 OR TABLE 13-610.1.ABC.2.1 OF CHAPTER | | 13 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING. | | BUILDING CAVITIES WHICH WILL BE USED AS RETURN AIR | | PLENUMS SHALL BE LINED WITH A CONTINUOUS AIR BARRIER | | MADE OF DURABLE NON-POROUS MATERIALS. ALL PENETRATIONS | | OF THE AIR BARRIER SHALL BE SEALED WITH A SUITABLE | | LONG-LIFE MASTIC MATERIAL. | | EXCEPTION: SURFACES BETWEEN THE PLENUM AND CONDITIONED | | SPACES FROM WHICH THE RETURN/MIXED AIR IS DRAWN. | | BUILDING CAVITIES BENEATH A ROOF DECK THAT WILL BE USED | | AS RETURN AIR PLENUMS SHALL HAVE AN INSULATED ROOF WITH | | THE INSULATION HAVING AN R-VALUE OF AT LEAST R-19. | | | | STARTING AUGUST 21, 2009, THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES | | DEPARTMENT WILL BE CLOSED ON FRIDAYS UNTIL FURTHER | | NOTICE. | | | | OPENING HOURS MONDAY - THURSDAY WILL REMAIN AT 8:00 AM | | - 5:00 PM. | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO COMPLETE OUR ANONYMOUS ON-LINE | | CUSTOMER SERVICE SURVEY AT: | | WWW.SURVEYMONKEY.COM/WESTPALMBEACHCONSTRUCTIONSERVICES | | | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES HOME PAGE | | HTTP://WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM/CONSTRUCTION/INDEX.PHP | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. | | | | MEMBER OF BOAF: BUILDING OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION OF | | FLORIDA SAVING LIVES AND PROPERTY SINCE 1953 | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-09-03 |
Time |
13:59 |
Rev Time |
0.70 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-09-03 |
Time |
13:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-09-03 13:31:01 | BLDG REV# 4 DATED 7-30-09 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-07-16 |
Time |
08:29 |
Rev Time |
2.22 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-07-16 |
Time |
08:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-07-16 08:46:07 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 08090247 | | ADD: 501 N ROSEMARY AVE | | CONT: NUJAK DEVELOPMENT | | TEL: (863)686-1565 | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | JUNE 16/09 | | APPROVED WITH BUILDING PROVISO: | | | | PLEASE REVIEW ENGINEERINGS NOTE FOR AIR RIGHT EASEMENT, | | THERE ARE TWO DOORS THAT APPEAR TO CROSS THE PROPERTY | | LINE AS SHOWN, DOOR# 101-1 AND DOOR 102-1 A PAIR OF | | FRENCH DOORS.SECTION 3202.2 DOORS AND WINDOWS SHALL NOT | | OPEN OVER THE RIGHT OF WAY. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE | | WITH AIR RIGHTS EASEMENT FOR OBJECTS WITHIN THE RIGHT | | OF WAY OR REVISE PLANS TO NOT HAVE SUCH VIOLATION. THE | | PAIR OF DOORS MAY BE WITHIN THE LEGAL LIMITS IF ONE | | DOOR IS INACTIVE AND THIS IS THE DOOR THAT WOULD HAVE | | CROSSED THE PROPERTY LINE THEN ONLY DOOR# 101-1 WOULD | | NEED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE. | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | SURVEY: | | WWW.SURVEYMONKEY.COM/WESTPALMBEACHCONSTRUCTIONSERVICES | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-01 |
Time |
11:55 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-04-01 |
Time |
11:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-04-01 11:57:54 | BUILDING: PLANS READY FOR PERMIT | | | | ROOFING PRODUCT APPROVAL: | | GAF EVERGUARD TPO SINGLE PLY ROOFING SYSTEM OVER WOOD | | DECK | | NOA 04-0723.02 | | DECK TYPE 1I WOOD INSULATED | | DECK DESCRIPTION 19/32 | | ALL LAYERS OF INSULATION ARE ADHERED TO A MECHANICALLY | | ATTACHED ANCHOR SHEET. MEMBRANE FULLY OR PARTIALLY | | ADHERRED. | | MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE: -60 PSF LIMITATION# 7. | | RAS 117 CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED! |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-02-02 |
Time |
15:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-02-02 |
Time |
15:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-02-02 15:40:28 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 08090247 | | ADD: 501 N ROSEMARY AVE | | CONT: NUJAK DEVELOPMENT | | TEL: (863)686-1565 | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | 2ND REVIEW | | DENIED. | | | | PLANS APPEAR TO BE CODE COMPLIANT SPOKE WITH AL | | PHILLIPS ABOUT THE ROOFING PRODUCT APPROVAL: | | | | GAF EVERGUARD TPO SINGLE PLY ROOFING SYSTEM OVER WOOD | | DECK | | NOA 04-0723.02 | | DECK TYPE 1I WOOD INSULATED | | DECK DESCRIPTION 19/32 | | ALL LAYERS OF INSULATION ARE ADHERED TO A MECHANICALLY | | ATTACHED ANCHOR SHEET. MEMBRANE FULLY OR PARTIALLY | | ADHERRED. | | MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURE: -60 PSF LIMITATION# 7. | | | | REQUIRES INHANCED FASTENING IN ZONE# 3 TO -89. | | | | NAT HEALY TO BRING IN INHANCED FASTENING BEFORE THE END | | OF THIS PLAN REVIEW CYCLE, THEN I CAN PASS AND STAMP | | SHEETS. | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | MEMBER OF BOAF, THE BUILDING OFFICIALS ASSOCIATION OF | | FLORIDA: PROTECTING LIVES AND PROPERTY SINCE 1953. | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | LAW. UNDER FLORIDA STATE STATUTE SB 80, E-MAIL | | ADDRESSES ARE PUBLIC RECORDS.WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO | | OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE | | PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. | | YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE THEREFORE SUBJECT TO | | PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-10-02 |
Time |
10:28 |
Rev Time |
8.55 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-10-02 |
Time |
10:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-10-02 12:14:18 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 08090247 | | ADD: 501 N ROSEMARY AVE | | CONT: NUJAK DEVELOPMENT | | TEL: (863)686-1565 | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | REVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | 1A) INFORMATIONAL: WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE | | INDICATE THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS | | NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL | | REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE | | REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL HELP TO | | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED | | COOPERATION. | | | | 1B) INFORMATIONAL: PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, | | PLANS, REPORTS, REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR | | SUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW FOR PERMIT. IF YOUR PROJECT WILL | | REQUIRE A RESIDENT INSPECTOR OR IF YOUR PROJECT IS A | | THRESHOLD BUILDING REQUIRING A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN | | (3) THREE SETS OF ALL SAID DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED | | FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. 106.1* /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS | | WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | | 1C) INFORMATIONAL FL S S 713.13 NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, | | TO BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT. NOTE: | | 713.13(2) IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF | | COMMENCEMENT IS NOT ACTUALLY COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS | | AFTER THE RECORDING THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & | | VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF | | COMMENCEMENT AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST | | INSPECTION. | | | | 1E) INFORMATIONAL: PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT (FIRST | | TIME REVIEW) AFTER JULY 1ST, 2007 SHALL BE REVIEWED TO | | THE 2004 FBC BUILDING WITH THE 2007 SUPPLEMENTS. | | | | 2) SHEET A0.00 CODE ANALYSIS INDICATES THIS BUILDING IS | | TO BE A TYPE III-B BUILDING AND A LEVEL III ALTERATION, | | MIXED OCCUPANCY WITH A BUSINESS OCCUPANCY FIRST FLOOR | | AND R-2 RESIDENCY SECOND FLOOR. | | SHEET A-1.01 ALSO INDICATES THE PROPERTY LINE ON THE | | WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY TO BE APPROXIMATELY 3'-0" | | AWAY. THE SURVEY PROVIDES A DIMENSION AT THE NORTHWEST | | CORNER OF THE BUILDING INDICATING | | A DISTANCE OF 2.90' AWAY FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. LEVEL | | III ALTERATIONS SECTION 705.1 THE MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL | | COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 605 EXCEPT AS | | MODIFIED IN SECTIONS 705.2 AND 705.3. UNDER LEVEL II | | SECTION 605.1 THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION SHALL BE | | LIMITED TO WORK AREAS THAT INCLUDE EXITS OR CORRIDORS | | SHARED BY MORE THAN ONE TENANT WITHIN THE WORK AREA IN | | WHICH LEVEL 2 ALTERATIONS ARE BEING PREFORMED, AND | | WHERE SPECIFIED THEY SHALL APPLY THROUGHOUT THE FLOOR | | ON WHICH THE WORK AREAS ARE LOCATED OR OTHERWISE BEYOND | | THE WORK AREA. | | | | 2A) WITH THIS BEING A LEVEL III ALTERATION THE EXTERIOR | | STAIRWAY BEING REPAIRED AND RELOCATED BASICALLY IN THE | | SAME LOCATION , PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE WITH 1022.5 . | | EXTERIOR EXIT STAIRWAYS SHALL BE LOCATED IN ACCORDANCE | | WITH SECTION 1023.3. | | 1023.3 EXIT DISCHARGE LOCATION. | | EXTERIOR BALCONIES, STAIRWAYS AND RAMPS SHALL BE | | LOCATED AT LEAST 10 FEET (3048 MM) FROM ADJACENT LOT | | LINES AND FROM OTHER BUILDINGS ON THE SAME LOT UNLESS | | THE ADJACENT BUILDING EXTERIOR WALLS AND OPENINGS ARE | | PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 704 BASED ON FIRE | | SEPARATION DISTANCE. | | | | 2B) THE SECOND ISSUE WITH NOT KNOWING THE DISTANCE FROM | | THE PROPERTY LINE AT THE SECOND FLOOR DOOR OPENING IS | | IN TABLE 704.8 FOR UNPROTECTED OPENINGS 0-3-0? ZERO | | OPENINGS IN THE WALL LINE. | | | | 2C) SHEET A-1.03 INDICATE A 5?X5? DOWNSPOUT, THE SITE | | PLAN INDICATES A 6?-0? HIGH SECURITY FENCE ALONG THE | | SAME PROPERTY LINE AND THE SURVEY INDICATES FROM THE | | BUILDING TO PROPERTY LINE A DISTANCE OF 2.90?. HOW WILL | | SECTION 1009.1EXCEPTION# 1 REQUIRING A 36? WIDE STAIR? | | | | 2D) THE OTHER ISSUE IS WITH THE 5?X5? DOWNSPOUT, HOW | | WILL SECTION 1009.11.7 PROJECTIONS INTO THE REQUIRED | | WIDTH AT EACH HANDRAIL SHALL NOT EXCEED 4.5 INCHES AT | | OR BELOW THE HANDRAIL HEIGHT. NOTE HANDRAILS ARE TO BE | | CONTINUOUS SEE 1009.11.4 CONTINUITY. | | | | 2E) THE PLANS FAIL TO INDICATE HANDRAILS AT EACH SIDE | | OF THE STAIRS. 1009.11. | | | | 3) SHEET A-1.01 DOOR# 115-1 MACHINE ROOM, AGAIN THIS | | NEW ADDITION WALL LINES UP WITH THE EXISTING WALL THAT | | IS 2.90? FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. TABLE 704.8 THAT DOES | | NOT ALLOW OPENINGS UNTIL GRATER THAN 5.0? FROM THE | | PROPERTY LINE FOR UNPROTECTED OPENINGS. ALSO NOTE THIS | | DOOR NEEDS TO BE A 1-HR RATED DOOR AS TO 3006.4. THE | | ONE HR RATING WOULD ALLOW UNDER PROTECTED OPENINGS 15% | | ALLOWABLE OPENINGS AT DISTANCES OF 3?-0? AND GREATER. | | THE OTHER ISSUE IS THE DOOR SWING IS OVER THE ALLOWABLE | | EGRESS PATH. 1008.1.8.8. | | | | 4) SHEET A-1.02 WINDOW OPENING 18A IS UNPROTECTED, IS | | AGAIN LESS THAN 5?-0? FROM THE PROPERTY LINE AND NOT | | ALLOWED TABLE 704.8. | | | | 5) SHEET A-3.01 WEST ELEVATION INDICATES A LOUVERS ON | | THIS ELEVATION AGAIN UNPROTECTED OPENINGS WOULD NOT BE | | ALLOWED WITH UNPROTECTED OPENINGS, PLEASE SEE TABLE | | 704.8 FOR UNPROTECTED OPENINGS AND FOR PROTECTED | | OPENINGS. | | | | 6) THIS BUILDING DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION AS TO | | FIRE SPRINKLERS, SO IT IS ASSUMED TO BE AN | | UN-SPRINKLERED BUILDING. WITH THE R-2 OCCUPANCY AND THE | | ADDITION OF THE ELEVATOR THE REQUIREMENT FOR A AREA OF | | RESCUE ASSISTANCE NECESSARY. PLEASE REVIEW ALL THE | | REQUIREMENTS OF 11-4.3.11(1-3). | | | | 6A) PLEASE INDICATE IF THE AREA OF RESCUE ASSISTANCE | | WILL BE LOCATED ON THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING OR IF | | IT WILL BE LOCATED ON THE EXTERIOR 2ND FLOOR LANDING OF | | THE BUILDING, AND NEEDING TO HAVE FIRE RATED WINDOWS | | AND DOORS. IN EITHER CASE PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED | | CLEAR FLOOR SPACE REQUIRED FOR THE AREA OF RESCUE | | ASSISTANCE AND THE MEANS OF EGRESS | | | | 6B) PLEASE ALSO TAKE NOTE OF THE REQUIRED 48? CLEAR | | BETWEEN HANDRAILS, | | 11-4.3.11.3. | | | | 7) SHEET A-1.02 THE SECOND STORY LANDING INDICATES A | | SCUPPER LOCATED AT FLOOR LEVEL TO DRAIN WATER FROM THE | | LANDING. THE WATER THAT DRAINS FROM THE SCUPPER LANDS | | DIRECTLY ON TO THE STAIRS BELOW, PLEASE PROVIDE | | COMPLIANCE WITH 1009.5.2 OUTDOOR CONDITIONS. | | | | 8) SHEET A-1.03 ROOF PLAN INDICATES ?GAF LIBERTY OR | | APPROVED EQUAL?, 106.1.1* W.P.B. ADMINISTRATIVE | | CODE/2004 DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN | | INFORMATION, IN THE FORM OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO | | THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO | | CONFORMITY WITH THE TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION | | SHALL BE SPECIFIC TO THE TECHNICAL CODES "SHALL NOT BE | | CITED AS A WHOLE OR IN PART, NOR THE TERM "LEGAL" OR | | ITS EQUIVALENT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC | | INFORMATION". CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE | | SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND | | EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT | | WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND | | RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS | | DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | | 9) SHEET A-4.01 S-3.02 BOTH INDICATE A NEW SECOND STORY | | EPICORE CONCRETE PRE-ENGINEERED FLOOR SYSTEM, PLEASE | | PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ARE SHOP DRAWINGS BEING | | CREATED, INDICATING OF SPANS, LOADS TO BE IMPOSED, | | REINFORCING AND SHORING. 1905, 1907. | | | | 10) PLEASE PROVIDE HOURLY RATING FOR THE EPICORE | | CONCRETE FLOOR SYSTEM, A 2HR FIRE RATING WILL BE | | REQUIRED BETWEEN THE R-2 OCCUPANCY AND BUSINESS | | OCCUPANCY BELOW. SEE TABLE 302.3.2& 712.4, ALSO PROVIDE | | FIRE RESISTANCE RATED ASSEMBLIES FOR THE PENETRATION OF | | THE SECOND STORY FLOOR ASSEMBLIES, 712.4.1. | | | | 11) PLANS FAIL TO PROVIDE FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLIES | | SOUND RATING AS REQUIRED BY 1207.3. STRUCTURE-BORNE | | SOUND. FLOOR/ CEILING ASSEMBLIES BETWEEN DWELLING UNITS | | AND A PUBLIC OR SERVICE AREA WITHIN THE STRUCTURE SHALL | | HAVE AN IMPACT INSULATION CLASS RATING OF NOT LESS THAN | | 50(45IF FIELD TESTED) WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | ASTM E 492. | | | | 12) SHEET A-1.02 WALL TYPE# 8 FAILS TO PROVIDE A STC | | RATING OF 50, 1207.2 AIR-BORNE SOUND. | | | | 13) SHEET A-2.01 SECOND STORY CORRIDOR REFLECTED | | CEILING PLAN DOES NOT INDICATE THE EXIT SIGNS , 1006.3. | | | | 14) PLANS S-1.01 INDICATE THE USE OF HELICAL PIER UNDER | | PINNING OF FOUNDATION, PLEASE PROVIDE SOILS REPORT . | | 1802.2.1 QUESTIONABLE SOIL. WHERE THE SAFE-SUSTAINING | | POWER OF THE SOIL IS IN DOUBT, OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING | | VALUE SUPERIOR TO THAT SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS | | CLAIMED, THE BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE | | NECESSARY INVESTIGATION BE MADE. SUCH INVESTIGATION | | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 1802.4 | | THROUGH 1802.6 . | | | | 15) SHEET S-0.01 IS USING THE WRONG VERSION OF THE | | ASCE-7-05. | | 2004 FBC 1609.1.1 & CHAPTER 35 REFERENCED STANDARDS | | RECOGNIZES ASCE 7-02 . ALSO 1603.1.4 WIND DESIGN DATA. | | | | 16) FL BLD CODE 1609.6.2.2 COMPONENTS & CLADDING, | | PROVIDE 2 COPIES OF PRODUCT TESTING REPORTS, MISSING | | REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS:\ | | 16A) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS | | 16B) FIXED, STOREFRONT | | 16C) MULLIONS | | 16D) EXTERIOR GLAZED DOORS | | 16E) EXTERIOR METAL DOORS | | 16F) EXTERIOR LOUVER DOORS | | 16G) WALL LOUVERS | | 16H) LINTELS | | 16I) ROOFING ASSEMBLIES, FLAT ROOF, UNDERLAYMENT?S, | | TILE AND ADHESIVES | | | | 17) PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT APPLICATION | | AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE | | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION PLEASE | | SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. | | PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT | | IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT | | HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR | | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE | | 9B-72. SEE ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | | 18) WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE | | PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF | | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | 19) THE INPUT DATA REPORT FROM THE ENERGY CALCS DOES | | NOT MATCH THE PLANS, THE COUNT ON THE WINDOWS AND THE | | SQUARE FOOTAGE ARE OFF AND THE DOOR TYPE AND DOOR COUNT | | DOES NOT MATCH THAT OF THE PLANS. THERE ARE A TOTAL OF | | 5 DOORS THAT LEAD INTO THE BUSINESS OFFICE PLEASE | | CORRECT. MISSING NORTH DOOR 101-2 AND PAIR OF DOORS | | 102-1. | | | | 20) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT | | FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL | | PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND | | A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT | | APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE | | INFORMATION. | | | | A THOROUGH REVIEW CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A | | RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF | | THIS REVIEW. | | | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-04-03 |
Time |
08:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-04-03 |
Time |
08:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-04-03 08:43:16 | PLANS REMOVED FROM ANA APPONTE'S OFFICE, REVIEWED AND | | STAMPED ELECTRICAL SHEETS. PLANS TAKEN BACK TO ANA'S | | OFFICE AND PLACED BACK ON ANA'S CHAIR. E-MAILED SENT TO | | CONFIRM THE REMOVAL AND RETURN OF PLANS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-03-29 |
Time |
10:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-03-29 |
Time |
10:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-03-29 10:56:34 | ** DENIED REVIEW ** | | 3RD REVIEW | | | | 1) NOTE: AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW, THE SYSTEM PER | | FBC 3006.2 IS NOT ON ELECTRICAL PLANS. THE RESPONSE | | LETTER MENTIONS TO SEE NOTE #1 IN LETTER HOWEVER THAT | | NOTE #1 WAS SPECIFIC TO CIRCUIT H-8 FROM PREVIOUS | | REVIEW. | | THIS HAS BEEN NOTED IN THE LAST THREE REVIEWS. WHERE IS | | THE DEDICATED CIRCUITING? WHERE THESE ON THE PANEL ARE | | SCHEDULES AS DEDICATED CIRCUITS? | | THE ONLY REVISION TO THIS NOW IS CIRCUIT H-38 WHICH IS | | NOT DEDICATED FOR THE FAN. IT CAN NOT BE ON WITH ANY | | OTHER DEVICES. | | THE SYSTEM NEEDS TO BE INDEPENDENT. | | | | ** A SEPARATE INFORMATIONAL; PLEASE TAKE A LOOK AT 2004 | | ASME-17 FOR ELEVATOR CODE REQUIREMENTS. THERE ARE | | SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES WHICH WILL AFFECT THIS PROJECT. | | | | 2) NOTE: THE SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT | | COMPLETE WITH ALL ELECTRICAL ITEMS ON PLANS IN THE | | INPUT DATA REPORT. MANY EXAMPLES WERE GIVEN ON PREVIOUS | | REVIEWS HOWEVER THE IDR IS STILL MISSING ELECTRICAL | | ITEMS. | | AN EXAMPLE: THERE IS A 12KW ELECTRIC WATER HEATER ON | | PLANS YET THE IDR IS BLANK. ANOTHER WOULD BE THE HW | | PIPING WHICH GOES ALONG WITH THIS. | | THESE ARE MINIMUMS IN THE CODE. | | PLEASE CORRELATE. | | 13-412.1.ABC.4, 13-412, 13-400.B.3 ETC | | | | *** KEEP IN MIND THERE MAY BE OTHER BUILDING COMPONENTS | | WHICH ARE NOT IN THE IDR WHICH MAY BE NOTED BY OTHER | | TRADES. | | | | 3) NOTE: SERVICE HAS BEEN REVISED. NEED TO SHOW LOAD | | CALCULATIONS TO BE SHOWN FOR THE NEW 800AMP MAIN. | | PLEASE ALSO INCLUDE LOAD ON THE HOUSE METER. THE | | ELEVATOR IS SHOWN BEING TAPPED FROM THE 400AMP METER | | ALONG WITH THE HOUSE PANEL. THE ONLY LOAD SHOWN FOR THE | | HOUSE METER IS THE LOAD ON THE HOUSE PANEL. | | NEC220 | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE WHEN SEALING THE PLANS ( SEE | | NEW SHEETS) THE SEAL IS CLEAR AND VISIBLE. THE NEW | | SHEETS IN SETS ARE VERY FAINT AND SOME CAN NOT BE SEEN | | EVEN USING LEAD RUB. | | FS 471.0221. | | | | ** IMPORTANT ** | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED | | INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-02-09 |
Time |
09:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-02-06 |
Time |
16:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-02-09 09:50:04 | ** DENIED 2ND REVIEW ** | | | | ** THERE ARE ITEMS WHICH ARE STILL IN NEED OF | | ADDRESSING FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEWS. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE CIRCUITING IN THE ELEVATOR | | MACHINE ROOM AND ELEVATOR ARE SHOWN NOW ON THE SAME | | CIRCUIT FOR H-8. PANEL SCHEDULE STATES RECEPTS/LIGHTS | | FOR ELEVATOR PIT HOWEVER BASED ON THE PLANS THESE ARE | | BEING SHARD INTO OTHER AREAS WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. | | PLEASE SEE 680.22-680.24. DEDICATED CIRCUITS ARE | | REQUIRED FOR EACH OF THE SPACES AS LISTED INCLUDING FOR | | THE ELEVATOR CAR ITSELF. | | PLEASE SEE THE NEXT COMMENT AS THIS IS AFFECT BY THE | | SAME NOTE. | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 3006.2 WITH THE REQUIRED | | INDEPENDENT SYSTEM FOR THE ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM. THIS | | WOULD REQUIRE DEDICATED CIRCUITING AS NOTED ABOVE IN | | COMMENT #1. ( NOTED PREVIOUS REVIEW ) | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH | | RESPECT TO FBC CHAPTER 13. COMPLIANCE FOR MINIMUM HAS | | NOT BEEN MET. | | | | A) THE SQUARE FOOTAGE ON PLANS AND CALCULATIONS | | SUBMITTED DO NOT COORDINATE. | | | | B) THE PLANS CONTAINS A METHOD *B* TABLE CALCULATION | | FOR SPACE BY SPACE. IT IS NOT PERMISSIBLE TO MIX | | METHODS OF CALCULATIONS. PLEASE SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1 | | | | C) PLEASE SEE THE INFORMATION ON THE INPUT DATA REPORT | | ALSO NEEDS TO COORDINATE WITH THE SUBMITTED PLANS. THE | | INPUT DATA REPORT WILL BE NOTED AS IDR ON THE REMAINDER | | OF THIS COMMENT. | | THERE ARE STILL LIGHTING FIXTURES ON PLANS WHICH ARE | | NOT IN THE IDR OR FIXTURE WATTAGES WHICH DO NOT | | COORDINATE. | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE THE COUNT ON THE EXTERIOR | | LIGHTS, WATTAGES DO NOT COORDINATE. THE IDR ONLY | | INDICATE 2-500WATT FIXTURES AND 8-46 WATT FIXTURES. | | THERE ARE ACTUALLY MORE FIXTURES ON PLANS BY COUNT AND | | WATTAGE. | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: INTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL INCLUDE ALL | | AREAS. BASED ON THE IDR, IT ONLY LIST TWO DIFFERENT | | TYPE OF FIXTURES. BASED ON THE PLANS AND THE FIXTURE | | LEGEND THIS IS NOT THE CASE. | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: FIXTURES NEED TO BE SPECIFIC. MOST | | FIXTURES STATE *TBD* WHICH THE VA RATING CAN NOT BE | | VERIFIED. PLEASE SELECT SPECIFIC FIXTURES. THESE MAY | | ALWAYS BE REVISED AT A LATER DATE IF A PRODUCT CHANGES. | | THE GOAL IS AT LEAST TO MEET THE MINIMUM CODES. | | *D* FIXTURES ARE SHOWN ON PLANS HOWEVER HAVE DIFFERENT | | SYMBOLS. WHEN LOOKING AT THE SYMBOL LEGEND YOU WILL SEE | | EACH OF THESE ARE ACTUALLY DIFFERENT. ONE IS 58VA AND | | THE OTHER 29 VA. | | | | | | *** THESE ARE SOME EXAMPLES ONLY GIVEN AS A BENEFIT TO | | HELP. THESE MAY NOT BE ALL ITEMS. IT IS IMPORTANT TO | | FIGURE HOW CALCULATIONS WILL BE DONE FOR EACH SPACE OR | | AS PART OF THE BUILDING. | | PLEAS BE SURE TO GO OVER AND CALL WITH ANY COMMENTS OR | | QUESTIONS FOR COORDINATION. | | 13-415.2,13-415.2.ABC.1.1,.1.2 AND .1.3. | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.2 FOR SPACE CONTROLS | | REQUIRED FOR CONFERENCE ROOM. ( NOTED ON PREVIOUS | | REVIEW) | | | | 5) NOTE: BASED ON A COMPLETE REVISED ELECTRICAL RISER, | | PLEASE SEE 230.70. THERE ARE UNPROTECTED CONDUCTORS | | INSIDE THE BUILDING WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. THE CODE | | SECTION GIVEN DOES NOT GIVE AN AMOUNT PERMITTED. | | THE OLD PALM BEACH COUNTY AND CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS PERMITTED UP TO 8FT, HOWEVER AS | | THE OLDER CODE CHANGED THE TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS WENT | | AWAY. SOME MUNICIPALITIES DO NOT PERMIT ANY UNPROTECTED | | CONDUCTORS INSIDE THE BUILDING. | | THE AMOUNT AS SHOWN ON PLANS IS OVER. PLEASE ADJUST | | DESIGN. | | | | ** IMPORTANT ** | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED | | INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | 2009-02-06 17:00:40 | REVIEW TO CONTINUE. REVIEW WILL GO INTO A FAILED STATUS | | ONCE COMPLETE. SOME NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW AND | | MEETING STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-10-06 |
Time |
11:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-10-06 |
Time |
11:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-10-06 11:43:07 | | | ** DENIED REVIEW ** | | | | *** PLEASE SEE COVER SHEET OF PLANS CALL FOR PLANS | | BEING 95% COMPLETE. PLEASE SUBMIT 100% PLANS. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED ENERGY COMPLIANCE | | CALCULATIONS PER 13-101.1, 13-415.2, | | 13-415.2.ABC.1.1,.1.2, .1.3. | | PLEASE SEE THE METHOD *A* AS SUBMITTED IS FOR A WHOLE | | BUILDING WHICH THIS IS NOT BASED ON USE AND OCCUPANCY. | | PLEASE SEE DEFINITIONS IN SECTION 202 FOR SEPARATIONS | | ETC. | | PLEASE KNOW IN ANY CASE THE CALCULATIONS AS SUBMITTED | | ARE NOT COMPLETE AND DO NOT COORDINATE WITH THE | | SUBMITTED PLANS. SOME EXAMPLES WILL BE GIVEN. THE INPUT | | DATA REPORT WILL BE NOTED AS IDR BELOW. | | | | EXAMPLE: THERE IS NO EXTERIOR LIGHTING IN THE IDR YET | | THE PLANS CLEARLY SHOW EXTERIOR FIXTURES. | | EXAMPLE: THERE ARE NO WATER HEATERS IN THE IDR, YET | | PLANS INDICATE ELECTRIC WATER HEATER. ( OFFICE SPACE) | | EXAMPLE: THERE ARE OTHER COMPONENTS ON PLANS WHICH ARE | | NOT PART OF THE IDR. PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM OTHER | | TRADES. | | EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE THE NUMBER, TYPE, WATTAGES OF THE | | INTERIOR LIGHTING BASED ON THE FIXTURE SON PLANS AND | | THE FIXTURE LEGEND DOES NOT COORDINATE. | | PLEASE BE SURE THE FIXTURE LEGEND IS SPECIFIC, COMPLETE | | AND COORDINATE ALL ON PLANS WITH THE IDR. | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 3006.2 FOR MISSING EQUIPMENT IN | | ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM. THIS WILL AFFECT THE ELECTRICAL | | PLANS. | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.2 FOR SEPARATE | | SPACES WHICH DO REQUIRED AUTOMATED LIGHTING CONTROLS. | | THE IDR INDICATES OCCUPANCY SENSORS YET THE PLANS DO | | NOT SEEM TO INDICATE ANY. | | PLEASE COMPLETE PLANS FOR MISSING DEVICES AS REQUIRED. | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.4 FOR REQUIRED | | EXTERIOR LIGHTING CONTROLS. THERE ARE TWO METHODS FOR | | CONTROLLING EXTERIOR LIGHTING. THE CONTROLS ON SHEET | | E-301 DOES NOT COMPLETE ALL THAT IS REQUIRED. PLEASE | | KEEP IN MIND IF USING AN OVER RIDE AS SHOWN THIS DEVICE | | MUST HAVE AN OVER RIDE OF SOME KIND WHICH WILL NOT | | PERMIT THE LIGHTING TO BE ON DURING DAY LIGHT HOURS. | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE VERIFY THE SIGN CIRCUIT REQUIRED PER | | 600.5 | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NFPA-72 DEFINITIONS. THE PLANS CALL | | FOR A *S* AND THE *S* ON THE SYMBOL LEGEND INDICATES A | | SMOKE DETECTOR INSIDE AND OUTSIDE EACH SLEEPING ROOM. A | | SMOKE DETECTOR BY DEFINITION IS A DEVICE WHICH WILL | | DETECT AND NOT SOUND AN ALARM. A SMOKE ALARM IS A | | DEVICE WHICH WILL DETECT AND SOUND THE ALARM. THE | | SYMBOL LEGEND SEEMS TO LEND TO A SMOKE ALARM BY THE | | DESCRIPTION. PLEASE VERIFY AND ADJUST. | | IF INSTALLING SMOKE DETECTORS, PLEASE COMPLETE PLANS | | WITH THE SYSTEM. (PANEL, SOUNDING DEVICES ETC). | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE UNIT *C* WHICH WILL REQUIRE ARC | | FAULT FOR ALL CIRCUITS IN AREA USED FOR SLEEPING AND | | LIVING ROOM. AS THESE ARE ONE IN THE SAME AFCI | | PROTECTION IS REQUIRED. 210.12 | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE UNITS A AND B AS THESE ARE MISSING | | RECEPTACLES PER 210.52B1, 210.11C1, 210.52C3, 4. (ROOMS | | 206,211 | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE UNITS A AND B FOR MISSING WALL | | RECEPTACLES PER 210.52. THESE ARE ABOUT THE SAME AREAS | | AS NOTED ABOVE IN NOTE #8. | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 422.13 AS WATER HEATERS ARE NOW | | CONSIDERED CONTINUOUS LOADS UNDER THE 2005 NEC. PLEASE | | ADJUST LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR THESE LOADS AT 125%. | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE PHOTO-METRICS FOR | | EGRESS PATHS. PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.1,.2.2 | | STAIRS REQUIRE A MINIMUM OF 10FT CANDLES UNDER NORMAL | | AND IS PERMITTED DOWN TO 1FT CANDLE UNDER EMERGENCY | | POWER. | | PLEASE PROVIDE LEVELS FOR ALL EGRESS AREAS. | | FAC 61G15-33.004 | | FBC 106.1.1, FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE THE SIZE OF THE GUTTER SO | | COMPLIANCE WITH FILL CAN BE VERIFIED. | | 366.22 | | | | 13) NOTE: BASED ON THE SITE PLANS AND SURVEY SUBMITTED | | THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE MAY NOT BE LOCATED ON THE SIDE | | OF THE BUILDING AS SHOWN. THE OVER HEAD SERVICE DOES | | MEET MINIMUM CLEARANCE FROM OPENINGS PER 23.24. | | THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE LOCATION DOES NOT MEET 110.26 | | FOR WORKING CLEARANCES REQUIRED. | | | | 14) NOTE: BASED ON MANY ASPECTS OF THE SCOPE OF WORK | | STILL IN NEED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE FROM THIS TRADE AS | | WELL AS OTHER TRADES THER MAY VERY WELL BE NEW COMMENTS | | ON THE NEXT REVIEW. | | | | | | | | | | **IMPORTANT** | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2009-09-22 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2009-09-22 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-09-22 10:00:35 | PREVIOUS COMMENTS FROM ENGINEERING ARE STILL APPLICABLE | | (DATED 07-08-09) | | | | REVISIONS ON THIS PLAN WHERE NOT RELATED TO ENGINEERING | | COMMENTS. | | | | [email protected] | | (561) 494-1085 |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dlauderm |
Date |
2009-07-08 |
Time |
12:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dlauderm |
Date |
2009-07-08 |
Time |
12:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-07-08 13:00:49 | APPROVED WITH PROVISOS: | | DEAN S. LAUDERMILK, PROJECT COORDINATOR, CONTACT NUMBER | | 494-1083 (ENGINEERING) 805-6716 (CONSTRUCTION SERVICES) | | 1. IF AN AIR RIGHTS EASEMENT HAS BEEN APPLIED FOR THIS | | COMMENT IS NO LONGER VALID. IF AN AIR RIGHTS EASEMENT | | HAS NOT BEEN APPLIED FOR THEN ONE NEEDS TO BE APPLIED | | FOR AND APPROVED PRIOR TO GETTING A CO. NO PERMANENT | | STRUCTURES ARE ALLOWED IN CITY ROW (BALCONY ABOVE | | ENTRANCE DOOR). | | 2. DOORS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO OPEN OUT INTO A SIDEWALK | | AND OR ROW. THE ENTRANCE DOOR ON RODSEMARY TO THE | | RECEPTION AREA NEEDS TO BE RECESSED OR REDESIGNED TO | | OPEN IN. | | 3. IRRIGATION PLAN NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED. THE | | ENGINEERING REVIEW INVOLVES THE SIZE OF METERS TO BE | | USED. | | A) IRRIGATION SYSTEM ZONES, GALLON PER MINUTE (GPM) | | FLOWS MUST BE SHOWN (PER SHEET IR-1 THE 4 ZONES ARE | | CALLED OUT). THE VALVE INFORMATION DETAIL ON IR-2 | | SHOWS, THE ZONE NUMBER, GALLONS PER MINUTE OF EACH ZONE | | AND SIZE OF VALVE FOR EACH ZONE NEEDS TO BE CALLED OUT, | | THEY ARE NOT. THEN SEE NOTE IR-B. | | B) A 5/8" WATER METER IS CALLED OUT FOR IRRIGATION | | USAGE ON IR-1 IN THE NOTES SECTION. A 5/8" WATER METER | | WILL ONLY GIVE 10 GPM (SAFE OPERATING FLOW). IF ANY | | ZONE IS LARGER THAN THIS THE METER SIZE SHALL NEED TO | | BE INCREASED. A 3/4" WATER METER WILL GIVE 15 GPM AND A | | 1" WATER METER WILL GIVE 25 GPM. IF ANY ZONE IS OVER 10 | | GPM THEN REDESIGN THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM OR INCREASE THE | | METER SIZE ACCORDANTLY. | | 4. IF THE STORMWATER PRE AND POST SQUARE FOOTAGE HAS | | BEEN GIVEN TO ENGINEERING THIS NOTE IS NO LONGER VALID. | | IF THE INFORMATION HAS NOT BE RECIEVED THEN FORWARD THE | | PRE AND POST PERVIOUS AND IMPERVIOUS SQ. FOOTAGE TO | | ENGINEERING. THIS WILL BE CHECKED AND CAN HOLD UP THE | | CO ON THE BUILDING. |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
efabian |
Date |
2009-04-03 |
Time |
12:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
efabian |
Date |
2009-04-03 |
Time |
12:13 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2009-03-02 |
Time |
12:51 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
2009-03-02 |
Time |
12:50 |
Sent To |
ENG |
|
Notes |
2009-03-02 12:51:52 | *** NOT PASSED *** | | | | ENGINEERING IS STILL REVIEWING PLANS. DEAN L 561 | | 644-7338 |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-09-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-09-24 |
Time |
09:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-09-24 |
Time |
09:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-09-24 09:21:48 | FAILED FOR FOLLOWING REASONS: | | | | 1. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGS THE TURBIDITY DETAILS OF | | POLLUTION PREVENTION . PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGS THE | | TURBIDITY AROUND CATCH BASINS DURING CONSTRUCTION AND | | ALL DEMOLITION PHASE. HEIGHT OF TURBIDITY BARRIER FENCE | | SHOULD BE HIGH ENOUGH PER FDEP TO STOP DUST PARTICLES. | | | | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF BOND FOR ORDINANCE NO. | | 4060-07: | | | | ALL DEMOLITION AND NEW CONSTRUCTION PERMITS, WITH | | EXCEPTION OF SINGLE FAMILY, DUPLEX AND ACCESSORY | | APARTMENT, SHALL POST BONDS OR DEPOSITS FOR THE | | FOLLOWING: | | | | 1. EROSION CONTROL, AND | | 2. LAND STABILIZATION | | | | THE AMOUNT OF THE EROSION CONTROL AND LAND | | STABILIZATION BONDS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER | | OF RECORD USING THE CURRENT CITY COST SCHEDULE AND | | VERIFIED BY THE CITY'S ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPT. | | PLEASE CONTACT BRIAN MOREE, ENG SERVICES CONSTRUCTION | | SUPERVISOR, AT 561- 494 -1040 FOR MORE INFORMATION. | | | | UPON VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION COMMENCEMENT, PAYMENT IN | | FULL OF ALL APPLICABLE FEES, AND COMPLIANCE WITH ALL | | TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ANY POSTED BOND, THE PERMITTEE | | MAY REQUEST RELEASE OF THE BONDS OR DEPOSITS. | | | | A COPY OF ORDINANCE NO. 4060-07 MAY BE OBTAINED FROM | | THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE LOCATED ON THE FIRST FLOOR. | | | | 3. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGS DUMPSTER & ITS ENCLOSURE | | DETAILS PER CITY OF WPB, & LOCATION ON DWG, LOCATION | | MUST BE ACCESSIBLE FOR PICKUP TRUCK. | | | | 4. PLEASE SHOW ON CALCULATION THAT YOU HAVE CONSIDERED | | FLOOD ZONE AREA, & 5,10, 25, 100 YEAR FLOOD CRITERIA | | AND CROWN OF THE ROAD WHEN YOU DETERMINE THE FIRST | | FLOOR ELEVATION. FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION SHOULD BE | | ATLEAST 1 FOOT HIGHER THAN HIGHEST CROWN OF THE ROAD. | | | | 5. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAINAGE DRAWING THE SITE AREA, | | GREEN, LAKE,PARKING AREA, IMPERVIOUS,PERVIOUS AREA YOU | | ARE DEVELOPING FOR THIS PROJECT . PLEASE MAKE SURE | | THESE AREAS SHOWN ON DRAINAGE DRAWINGS MUST MATCH WITH | | AND USED IN STORM WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS. PLEASE | | PROVIDE A COPY OF THESE CALCULATIONS. | | | | 6. PLEASE SHOW ALL STORM WATER PIPES AROUND YOUR SITE | | SO, WE CAN SEE THE LAYOUT OF STORM WATER PIPES FROM ALL | | OTHER STORM WATER PIPES. PLEASE SHOW DETAIL OF THE | | CONTROL STRUCTURES WITH ELEVATIONS, NOTCHES, BLEEDING | | ELEVATION, ETC ON DRAWINGS, CALCULATION FOR | | EXFILTRATION TRENCHES, PLEASE SHOW DRY DETENTION/WET | | DETENTION AREAS IN STORM WATER CALS IF YOU HAVE ALL | | THESE. PLEASE RESUBMIT GEO-TECH REPORT AND ALL | | ENVRONMENTAL REPORT. | | | | 7. ALSO PLEASE SHOW ALL CATCH BASINS NEAREST, AROUND | | YOUR SITE FOR STORM WATER DRAIN SO YOUR SITE DO NOT GET | | FLOODED AND HAVE ENOUGH DRAINS. | | | | 8. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF GEO-TECH REPORT & STORM | | WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS TO 1000 45TH STREET FOR | | THEIR APPROVAL BEFORE WE ISSUE A PERMIT. | | | | 9. WATER & SEWER PLANS MUST BE APPROVED FROM MANNY G. | | OF 1000 45TH STREET BEFORE WE ISSUE A PERMIT. | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI 805-6723 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-12-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-12-22 |
Time |
14:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-12-22 |
Time |
14:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-12-22 14:25:41 | ******REVISION APPROVED***** | | | | SEE REVISION TRACKING PERMIT NUMBER 09120104 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-09-17 |
Time |
11:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-09-17 |
Time |
11:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-09-17 11:49:52 | *****REVISION #4, DATED 7/30/09, APPROVED***** | | | | REVISED SHEET A-1.01 STAMPED, INITIALED, AND DATED. | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-04-01 |
Time |
15:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-04-01 |
Time |
14:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-04-01 15:17:46 | *****APPROVED***** | | | | A-0.00, AD-1.01,A-2.01, A-3.02, A-4.11, A-6.01, AND | | E-202 WERE STAMPED, INITIALED, AND DATED; SHEET E-101 | | TO BE FIRE-STAMPED WHEN THE ELECTRICAL EXAMINER'S | | COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-02-20 |
Time |
11:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-02-20 |
Time |
09:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-02-20 11:08:53 | *****UNSAT***** | | | | THE COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE PLAN REVIEW HAVE | | BEEN ADDRESSED; HOWEVER THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEETS WILL | | BE FIRE-STAMPED WHEN THE BELOW NEW COMMENT AND THE | | OTHER PLAN EXAMINERS' COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED | | | | | | *NEW COMMENT | | | | AA. CIVIL DRAWINGS (C-1, C-2, C-3,) WHICH WERE INCLUDE | | IN THE ORIGINAL PLAN SUBMITTAL ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS | | PLAN SET (ALTHOUGH THE COVER SHEET HAS THEM INCLUDED IN | | THE DRAWING INDEX). PLEASE EXPLAIN. | | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-10-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-10-17 |
Time |
13:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-10-17 |
Time |
10:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-10-17 13:44:23 | *****DENIED***** | | | | 01. THE COMPLETE ADDRESS SHALL BE IN THE TITLE BLOCK OF | | EACH SUBMITTED PLAN SHEET. BE ADVISED THAT THIS IS | | NORTH ROSEMARY AVENUE, NOT JUST ROSEMARY AVENUE AS | | SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED SHEETS. | | | | 02. ON SHEET L-1.01 PICTORIAL CAPTION 1 AND SHEET | | C-0.01, C-0.03, A-0.01, AD-3.01 (EAST ELEVATION) & | | A-3.02 (EAST ELEVATION), ROSEMARY IS IS INCORRECTLY | | LABELED AS A STREET AND NOT AN AVENUE. | | | | 03. STRUCTURES UNDERGOING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, OR | | DEMOLITION OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 241. | | | | 04. THE SCOPE OF WORK SHALL NOT HINDER OR INTERFERE | | WITH EMERGENCY ACCESS TO THE SAID PROPERTY OR THE | | VICINITY THEREOF (INCLUDING ROADS, ALLEYS, FIRE LANES) | | . | | | | 05. ON SHEET A-0.00, THE PHONE NUMBER FOR WEST PALM | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE IS 561-804-4700. | | | | 06. EXPLAIN THE PURPOSE OF THE EXIT SIGN LIGHTS SHOWN | | ON SHEET A0.00 IN AREAS MARKED 107-1 & 107-2 AS | | INDICATED ON SHEET A-1.01. | | | | 07. PROVIDE THE PRESCRIPTIVE STRENGTHS FOR THE | | GUARDRAILS/HANDRAILS. | | | | 08. STAIRS SHALL HAVE HANDRAILS ON BOTH SIDES. IT | | APPEARS THAT THE WEST ELEVATION STAIRS HAVE HANDRAILS | | ON ONE SIDE. | | | | 09. OUTSIDE STAIRS AND LANDINGS SHALL BE DESIGNED BE TO | | MINIMIZE WATER ACCUMULATION ON THEIR SURFACES. | | | | 10. THE WIDTH OF STAIRS SHALL COMPY WITH NFPA 101 - | | 7.2.2.2.1 - 2003 EDITION. | | | | 11. IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE AND DETAILS (SHEET A-6.01), | | EXPLAIN WHY THE MECHANICAL ROOM (#111-1) AND STORAGE | | ROOM (#113-1) DOORS ARE NOT FIRE RATED. | | | | 12. IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE AND DETAILS (SHEET A-6.01), | | WHY IS EXTERIOR HALLWAY DOOR 204-1 FIRE-RATED BUT NOT | | 204-2 ? | | | | 13. IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE AND DETAILS (SHEET A-6.01), | | WHY ARE INTERIOR HALLWAY (COMMON CORRIDOR) DOORS 205-1 | | AND 210-1 NOT FIRE RATED. | | | | 14. DOORS AND WINDOWS REQUIRED TO HAVE A FIRE RATING | | SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 80. | | | | 15. IT IS SHOWN THAT THIS BUILDING WILL HAVE A FIRE | | ALARM SYSTEM. EXPLAIN WHAT SMOKE SENSORS ARE IN | | RELATION TO SMOKE DETECTORS AND/OR SMOKE ALARMS. BE | | ADVISE THAT SMOKE DETECTORS (SD) ARE TIED INTO THE | | BUILDING'S FIRE ALARM SYSTEM WHEREAS SMOKE ALARMS (SA) | | ALERT THE OCCUPANT(S) OF THE DWELLING UNIT ONLY. | | | | 16. IF THE BUILDING IS TO BE EQUIPPED WITH A FIRE ALARM | | SYSTEM, SMOKE DETECTORS (SD) ARE REQUIRED IN THE 2ND | | FLOOR HALLWAY (COMMON CORRIDOR) . | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER INDICATING WHERE/HOW THE ITEMS WERE ADDRESSED | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-12-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2009-12-07 |
Time |
08:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2009-12-07 |
Time |
08:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-12-07 08:28:11 | SENT TO C8. |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-10-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-10-28 |
Time |
12:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-10-28 |
Time |
12:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-10-28 12:26:25 | INCOMING TO: J WITMER |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-09-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-09-02 |
Time |
10:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-09-02 |
Time |
10:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-06-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-06-24 |
Time |
15:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-06-24 |
Time |
15:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-03-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-03-30 |
Time |
14:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-03-30 |
Time |
14:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-03-30 14:05:25 | TO "C33" |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-01-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-01-21 |
Time |
09:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-01-21 |
Time |
09:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-01-21 09:18:58 | TO "COMM" BD#63 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-10-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-10-17 |
Time |
10:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-09-12 |
Time |
10:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-09-12 10:49:13 | TO "COMM" BD#20 |
|
|
Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
2009-09-08 |
Time |
12:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
2009-09-08 |
Time |
12:32 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-03-31 |
Time |
15:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-03-31 |
Time |
15:22 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-02-21 |
Time |
15:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-02-21 |
Time |
15:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-02-21 15:40:13 | ALL PREVIOUS COMMENTS ADDRESSED. HOWEVER, NO ENERGY | | CALCULATIONS COULD BE FOUND IN THIS SUBMISSION FOR THE | | RESIDENTIAL UNITS. REVIEW WILL REMAIN IN FAIL STATUS | | PENDING SUBMISSION OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND COOLING | | LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | 561.805.6719 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-09-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-09-29 |
Time |
08:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-09-24 |
Time |
15:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-09-29 08:26:05 | REVIEW #: 1ST | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | 1. PAGE M-1.01: TOILET ROOM 113 EXHAUST DUCT FROM TEF-1 | | IS SHOWN ROUTED THROUGH THE RETURN AIR PLENUM CEILING. | | EXHAUST DUCTS UNDER POSITIVE PRESSURE SHALL NOT EXTEND | | INTO OR PASS THROUGH DUCTS OR PLENUMS IN ACCORDANCE | | WITH FBCM 601.3. | | | | 2. PAGE M-1.01: AHU-1 SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH DUCT SMOKE | | DETECTOR FOR FAN SHUT-DOWN IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM | | 606.2.1. DUCT DETECTOR SHALL BE TIED TO BUILDING FIRE | | ALARM SYSTEM (IF ONE IS PRESENT) OR BE PROVIDED WITH | | AUDIBLE/VISIBLE NOTIFICATION APPLIANCE (SUCH AS A | | HORN/STROBE) IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 606.4. | | | | 3. PAGE M-1.02: EF SCHEDULE INDICATES TEF-1 ON 1ST | | FLOOR IS TO BE CONTROLLED WITH LIGHT SWITCH. THIS FAN | | SHALL BE INTERLOCKED WITH AHU-1 IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM | | 403.2.1(3). | | | | 4. PROVIDE DETAIL FOR ATTACHMENT OF CU-1. CU-4 AND | | CU-5, SHOWING THEM ATTACHED TO RESIST WIND PRESSURES IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 301.13. ALSO, PROVIDE | | DOCUMENTATION FROM THE A/C APPLIANCE MANUFACTURERS | | SHOWING HOW ALL APPLIANCES EXPOSED TO WIND ARE DESIGNED | | AND CONSTRUCTED TO RESIST WIND PRESSURES IN ACCORDANCE | | WITH THIS SECTION. | | | | 5. 1ST FLOOR MECHANICAL PLAN SHOWS AN ABOVE-CEILING | | PLENUM RETURN SYSTEM. DETAILS ON ARCHITECTURAL PLANS | | SHOW INTERIOR FINISHES ON EXTERIOR WALLS, SUCH AS | | DRYWALL AND INSULATION ARE TO STOP AT THE CEILING LINE. | | EXPOSED CONCRETE BLOCK SHALL NOT BE USED AS A PLENUM | | AIR BARRIER. BUILDING CAVITIES WHICH WILL BE USED AS | | RETURN AIR PLENUMS SHALL BE LINED WITH A CONTINUOUS AIR | | BARRIER MADE OF DURABLE NON-POROUS MATERIALS IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 603.8, SHALL BE SEALED IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 603.9 AND INSULATED IN ACCORDANCE | | WITH FBCB TABLE 13-410.1.ABC.2.2. EXTERIOR WALLS USED | | AS PLENUM AIR BARRIERS SHALL BE INSULATED TO A MINIMUM | | OF R-8 PER THIS TABLE. THIS ALSO APPLIES TO THE | | EXTERIOR WALL IN MECHANICAL ROOM 111. | | | | 6. COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR THE SPACES LISTED ON | | FORM 400A SHALL BE PROVIDED. THIS CALCULATION SHALL BE | | ATTACHED TO THE CODE COMPLIANCE FORM SUBMITTED TO THE | | BUILDING DEPARTMENT WHEN THE BUILDING IS PERMITTED IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 13-407.1.ABC.1. | | | | 7. PAGE M-1.01: OUTSIDE AIR INTAKE FOR AHU-1 SHALL BE | | PROVIDED WITH SHUTOFF DAMPER CONTROLS IN ACCORDANCE | | WITH FBCB 13-409.1.ABC.3.3. | | | | PLEASE RESPOND TO EACH COMMENT IN WRITING, WITH A | | DESCRIPTION OF HOW EACH COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED AND WHERE | | THE REQUIRED INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND. THIS WILL HELP | | TO FACILITATE A TIMELY REVIEW. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | 561.805.6719 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-09-14 |
Time |
08:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-09-14 |
Time |
08:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-09-14 08:58:41 | REVISION OK -- SHT IR-1. -- IR-2 RETURNED TO CONTRATOR | | AS NOT CHANGES/REVISIONS WERE FOUND. |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-07-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-07-14 |
Time |
10:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-07-14 |
Time |
10:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-07-14 10:52:15 | REVISION OK -- NEW SHEETS IR-1 & IR-2. IRRIGATION | | PERMIT REQUIRED. |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-03-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-31 |
Time |
07:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-31 |
Time |
07:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-03-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-02 |
Time |
10:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-03-02 |
Time |
10:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-03-02 10:24:45 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | 1. OK | | | | 2. SUBMIT MANUF. SPECIFICTIONS FOR THE BUBBLER SHOWING | | CONFORMANCE WITH ASME A112.19.1M, ASME A112.19.2M OR | | ASME A112.19.9M AS WELL AS NSF61 SECTION 9. SECTION | | 410. | | ****NO WRITTEN RESPONSE, COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED FOR THE | | ASME REQUIREMENT. | | | | 3. SHT A-1.02 A WASH MACHINE CONNECTION IS REQUIRED IN | | THE UNIT WITH ROOMS 201, 202 & 203. TABLE 403.1. | | ****NO WRITTEN RESPONSE, COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED FOR THE | | UNIT WITH ROOM 201. | | | | 4. OK | | 5. OK | | 6. OK | | 7. OK | | 8. OK | | 9. OK | | 10. OK | | 11. OK | | | | **********NEW COMMENTS********** | | | | 1B. SHT S-1.05 NOTE STATES: " RECONSTRUCT ROOF DRAINS | | AND ADD OVERFLOW SCUPPERS. (SEE ARCH. DRAWINGS SHT | | A-1.03)". THERE ARE NO OVERFLOW SCUPPERS INDICATED ON | | SHT A-1.03. PLEASE CORRELATE. -- SECONDARY ROOF | | DRAINS/SCUPPERS ARE REQUIRED PER SECTIONS 1107.1, | | 1107.2 & 1107.3 AS WELL AS TABLE 1106.7. PLEASE SHOW | | REQUIRED OVERFLOW SCUPPERS. SUBMIT A DETAIL FOR THE | | SCUPPERS SHOWING THE HEIGHT & WIDTH AS WELL AS THE | | DISTANCE FROM THE ROOF TO THE FLOW LINE AS REQUIRED IN | | SECTION 1503.4.3 OF THE BUILDING CODE. | | | | 2B. SHT P-1.02 DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ISOMETRIC RISER | | AND THE SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER INDICATE FUTURE WASH | | MACHINE CONNECTIONS FOR ONE UNIT. THIS IS NOT APPROVED | | AS WASH MACHINE CONNECTIONS ARE REQUIRED PER TABLE | | 403.1. | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | ****NO RESPONSE TO THE TRANSMITTAL LETTER INDICATING | | THE DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE TO CORRECT THE | | COMMENTS. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-09-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-09-15 |
Time |
12:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-09-12 |
Time |
16:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-09-15 13:37:04 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | | | 1. SUBMIT A DETAIL FOR THE DRINKING FOUNTAIN SHOWING | | COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 11-4.15 WITH ALL SUBSECTIONS AS | | WELL AS SECTION 11-4.1.3(10)(A) PROVISIONS FOR THOSE | | WHO HAVE DIFFICULTY BENDING OR STOOPING. | | | | 2. SUBMIT MANUF. SPECIFICTIONS FOR THE BUBBLER SHOWING | | CONFORMANCE WITH ASME A112.19.1M, ASME A112.19.2M OR | | ASME A112.19.9M AS WELL AS NSF61 SECTION 9. SECTION | | 410. | | | | 3. SHT A-1.02 A WASH MACHINE CONNECTION IS REQUIRED IN | | THE UNIT WITH ROOMS 201, 202 & 203. TABLE 403.1. | | | | 4. SHT A-5.01 DETAIL (1), LAV SHALL BE MINIMUM 15" OFF | | THE WALL TO THE CENTERLINE OF THE FIXTURE TO BE | | CENTERED ON THE REQUIRED 30" WIDTH OF THE CLEAR FLOOR | | SPACE. SECTION 11-4.19.3 & FIGURE 32. | | | | 5. SHT A-5.01 DETAIL (2), THE DISPENSER SHALL BE | | MINIMUM 19" OFF THE FLOOR TO THE CENTERLINE. DETAIL | | SHOWS 17" TO CENTERLINE. SECTION 11-4.19.6 & FIGURE | | 29(B). | | | | 6. SHT A-5.01 SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 11-4.19.5 | | FAUCETS. | | | | 7. SHT A-5.01 DETAIL (4), INDICATES "OPTIONAL CUP | | HOLDER". IF THE CUP HOLDER IS NOT REQUIRED, THEN SHOW | | COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 11-4.1.3(10)(A) PROVISIONS FOR | | THOSE WHO HAVE DIFFICULTY BENDING OR STOOPING. | | | | 8. SHT P-1.01 AN RPZV BACKFLOW IS REQUIRED ON THE WATER | | SERVICE TO THE BUSINESS OCCUPANCY. SECTION 608.13.3. | | | | 9. SHT P-1.02 SANITARY ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM DOES NOT | | REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN. THE CLEANOUT SHOWN ON THE RISER | | DIAGRAM DOWNSTREAM OF THE LAST TWO 3" RISERS IS NOT | | SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN. -- RISER DOES NOT SHOW THE | | VENT THRU THE ROOF FOR THE FIXTURES ON THE FIRST FLOOR. | | PLEASE CORRELATE. SECTIONS 106.1.1, 708.3.3 & 903.3. | | | | 10. SHT P-1.02 NOTE FOR WATER HEATER AT THE TOP OF THE | | SHEET IS NOT LEGIBLE. PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | | 11. SUBMIT A WATER ISOMETRIC RISER DIAGRAM SHOWING ALL | | PIPE SIZES, VALVES, WATER HAMMER ARRESTORS (REQD BY | | SECTION 604.9) ETC. SECTION 105.3.5.1.3 & 601.1. | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-09-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
2009-09-10 |
Time |
10:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
2009-09-10 |
Time |
10:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-07-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
2009-07-21 |
Time |
11:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
2009-07-21 |
Time |
11:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-07-21 11:48:41 | 1. C-00.1 DRAWING AND LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS ARE | | INCONSISTENT. PATH FROM PARKING AREA IS SHOWN IN | | DIFFERENT LOCATION, AND AC SCREENING WALL IS MISSING ON | | CIVIL DRAWINGS. | | 2. PLEASE SHOW EXISTING TREE GRATES ON SIDEWALK. | | 3. LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY SHALL | | BE 5 FEET (PLANTING AREA). PLEASE REDUCE THE WIDTH OF | | THE PARKING SPACES TO 8'-6" TO PROVIDE FOR ADDITIONAL | | LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED. | | 4. LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS PRESENTED INDICATE A | | DEFICIENCY ON PLANTING MATERIAL. PLEASE CORRECT. | | 5. PLEASE INDICATE WHERE THE TRASH RECEPTACLES WILL BE | | LOCATED. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-04-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
2009-04-06 |
Time |
08:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
2009-04-06 |
Time |
08:35 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-04-06 10:23:33 | PROVISO: | | LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS SHALL BE RESUBMITTED WITH THE | | FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS: | | 1. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-442(A), LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL | | BE PREPARED, SIGNED AND SEALED BY A REGISTERED | | LANDSCAPED ARCHITECT. | | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE A TABULATION NECESSARY FOR THE | | EVALUATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZONING | | AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, INCLUDING THE | | XERISCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS. | | 3.PLEASE IDENTIFY ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN ALL UTILITIES, | | EASEMENTS, SITE LIGHTING, OVERHEAD LINES, OVERHANGING | | TREE LIMBS FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND ANYHTING ELSE | | THAT MAY INTERFERE WITH THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING. | | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE THE SCIENTIFIC AND COMMON NAMES AND | | THE SPACING OF ALL PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL. PLANTING | | DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED. NOTES CONCERNING IRRIGATION | | COVERAGE, DEPTH AND TYPE OF MULCH, PLANT GRADES AND | | ERADICATION OF PROHIBITED PLANT SPECIES SHALL ALSO | | APPEAR ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | 5. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443(C)(5)(A), LANDSCAPE AREAS | | SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM VEHICULAR USE AREAS BY | | NON-MOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURBING ON THE TYPE | | CHARACTERIZED AS "TYPE D". | | 6. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443(C)(2) TABLE XIV-1, TREES | | SHALL BE PLANTED AT 30 FOOT INTERVALS AND HEDGES SHALL | | BE PLANTED AT TWO-FOOT INTERVALS ALONG EACH REQUIRED | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER. PLEASE PROVIDE TREES ALONG THE NORTH | | AND WEST SIDE OF THE SURFACE PARKING LOT. | | 7. THE PROPOSED HEDGES ALONG THE NORTH AND WEST SIDE OF | | THE PARKING LOT SHALL BE PLANTED ALONG THE PROPERTY | | LINE TO AVOID CREATING A "DOG RUN" BETWEEN THE HEDGE | | AND THE FENCE. | | 8. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-445(4)(G)(3) AUTOMATIC | | IRRIGATION SYSTEMS SHALL BE USED FOR CULTIVATED | | LANDSCAPE AREAS FOR ALL PROPERTIES. THIS INCLUDES THE | | RIGHT-OF-WAY PLANITNGS. | | 9.PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-444(B) GARBAGE OR TRASH | | RECEPTACLES AND ALL OTHER MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL | | NOT BEPERMITTED UNLESS APPROPRIATE SCREENING IS | | PROVIDED. SCREENING SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF BRICK, | | DECORATIVE CONCRETE, OTHER DECORATIVE MASONRY, OR | | COMPARABLY DURABLE WOOD AND STEEL. WALLS SHALL BE | | LANDSCAPED WITH SHRUBS AND HEDGES PLANTED AT TWO-FOOT | | INTERVALS. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF THESE ITEMS | | AND INDICATE THE MANNER IN WHICH THESE ITEMS WILL BE | | SCREENED. | | 10. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-442(B)(2)(B)(1) AT LEAST ONE | | SHADE TREE SHALL BE PLANTED FOR EACH 1600 SQ FT. OF | | OPEN SPACE OR PORTION THEREOF. AT LEAST ONE FLOWERING | | TREE SHALL BE PLANTED FOR EACH 6,400 SQ.FT. OF OPEN | | SPACE OR PORTION THEREOF. | | 11. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-445(4)(A) SHADE AND | | FLOWERING TREES PLANTED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF | | THIS SECTIONS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET IN HEIGHT, | | AND POSESS A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET OF CLEAR TRUNK SPACE. | | THE PROPOSED PIGEON PLUM TREES DO NOT MEET THIS MINIMUM | | REQUIREMENT. | | 12. PLEASE STUDY THE POSSIBILITY TO HAVE WINDOWS ON THE | | WEST ELEVATION. IF WINDOWS ARE NOT POSIBLE OTHER | | TECHNIQUES SHOULD BE USE TO ENHANCE THE QUALITY OF THE | | WEST ELEVATION. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-01-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
2009-01-27 |
Time |
10:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
2009-01-27 |
Time |
10:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-01-27 11:25:07 | 1. A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THE REMOVAL | | OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING TREES ON SITE. | | 2. A TREE SHALL BE INSTALLED ON EMPTY TREE GRATE ON | | SIDEWALK. SPECIE SHALL BE CONSISTENT WILL OTHER SPECIES | | ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE. | | 3. PLEASE REFLECT THE EXISTING TREE ALONG THE SOUTH | | SIDE OF THE PROPERTY (2). | | 4. BUILDING ENCROACHMENTS, SUCH AS BALCONIES, SHALL NOT | | OCCUR WITHIN FOUR FEET OF THE BACK OF CURB. PROPOSED | | BALCONY ON SOUTH ELEVATION IS ONLY TWO FEET OF THE BACK | | OF CURB. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-09-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
2008-09-23 |
Time |
16:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
2008-09-23 |
Time |
15:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-09-23 15:21:10 | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A TABLE WITH BUILDING TOTAL SQUARE | | FOOTAGE. | | 2. PROPOSED CHAIN LINKE SHALL BE VINYL COATED. | | 3. PROPOSED CHAIN LINK FENCE SHALL NOT EXCEED 4 FEET IN | | HEIGHT WHEN LOCATED WITHIN FRONT SETBACK (12' FROM BACK | | OF CURB ALONG ROSEMARY AVE, AND 17' FROM BACK OF CURB | | ALONG 4TH STREET) | | 4. GARDEN WALL AND GATE SHALL NOT EXCEED 4 FEET ON | | MAXIMUM HEIGHT. A MAXIMUM 10% ADDITIONAL HEIGHT IS | | ALLOWED FOR DECORATIVE ELEMENTS SUCH AS BLOCK PIER. | | 5. TWO BIKE RACKS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE PROJECT. | | 6. STAFF RECOMMENDS INCREASING THE AMOUNT OF GLAZING | | AREA PROVIDED ON THE FIRST FLOOR ALONG 4TH STREET. | | REGULATIONS FOR NEW STRUCTURES REQUIRE A MINIMUM OF 30% | | TRANSPARENCY. |
|
|