| 2008-07-22 16:08:21 | ROOFING, BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| | REVIEW UNDER FBC 2004 WITH 2007 REVISIONS. |
| | |
| | ***NOTE:BUILDING PERMIT REFERENCED ON PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION IS THREEYEARS OLD AND THERE IS NOT WORK |
| | AND INSPECTION ACTIVITY. |
| | EXPIRED PERMIT WASREVIEWED UNDER 2001 FBC.CURRENT |
| | BUILDING CODE IS 2004 FBC.PERMIT APPLICATION IS TO BE |
| | REVIEWED UNDER THE 2004 FBC. |
| | |
| | 1- CLEARLY IDENTIFY SPECIFIC APPROVED ASSEMBLYAND |
| | SPECIFIC FASTENING OPTION TO BE INSTALLED AS REQUIRED |
| | BY CITY POLICY AND PROCEDURE FOR SUBMITTING PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS FOR ROOFING/REROOFING PERMITS. SEE ATTACHED |
| | COPY. |
| | |
| | 2- IF SELECTED ASSEMBLY AND FASTENING OPTION DOESN'T |
| | MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES OF TABLE1609.6.2.1(2) OF |
| | FBC 2004 FOR FIELD, PERIMETER AND CORNER AREAS, THEN |
| | SIGNEDAND SEALEDRAS 117 CALCULATIONS WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED FOR NAIL ENHANCING AT PERIMETER AND CORNER |
| | AREAS.SEE GENERAL LIMITATION #7 ON SHEET 16 OF 16 OF |
| | NOA 06-0601.08 SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | ***NOTE: NOTE: IF SELECTED ASSEMBLY IS LIMITED BY |
| | GENERAL LIMITATION #9 AND THE DESIGN PRESSURES DON'T |
| | MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ABOVE FBC 2004 TABLE, THEN |
| | THE ASSEMBLY CAN'T BE INSTALLED BECAUSE GENERAL |
| | LIMITATION #9 DOESN'T ALLOW NAILENHANCING. |
| | |
| | 3- CLEARLY SPECIFYROOF SQUARE FOOTAGE TO PROPERLY |
| | ASSESS PERMIT VALUATION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 108.3 OF |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. |
| | |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561)805-6712 |
