Plan Review Stops For Permit 08060493 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-08-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-08-07 |
Time |
16:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-08-07 |
Time |
16:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-07-30 |
Time |
09:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-07-30 |
Time |
09:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-07-30 09:31:15 | 2004 FBC W/2007 REVISIONS | | INSTALL SIGN ON HIGH RISE | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | 1) THE SIGN IS LOCATED ON A HIGH RISE BUILDING WITH A | | MEAN ROOF HEIGHT ABOVE 60 FEET. THE COMPONENT AND | | CLADDING WINDLOADS ARE REQUIRED TO BE CALCULATED USING | | ASCE7-02 OR WIND TUNNEL TESTING. SEE FBC 1609.1.1 THE | | SIMPLIFIED WINDLOAD METHOD CAN NOT BE USED FOR | | BUILDINGS WITH A MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF 60 FEET AND THE | | BUILDING HAS A MEAN ROOF HEIGHT OF 237 FEET. REPEAT | | COMMENT. | | | | 2) THE FBC TABLE NUMBERS REFERENCED ON THE ENGINEERING | | WERE CHANGED IN THE REVISIONS TO THE 2004 FBC. PLEASE | | NOTE. | | | | 3)THE NEW DRAWINGS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE THE CITY | | PLACE STAMP OF APPROVAL. | | | | 4) A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT WILL | | BE REQUIRED. FS 713 | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | (561)805-6714 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-07-09 |
Time |
09:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-07-09 |
Time |
09:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-07-09 09:31:07 | 2004 FBC W/2007 REVISIONS | | INSTALL SIGN ON HIGH RISE | | | | DENIED BY BUILDING | | | | 1) THE SIGN IS LOCATED ON A HIGH RISE BUILDING WITH A | | MEAN ROOF HEIGHT ABOVE 60 FEET. THE COMPONENT AND | | CLADDING WINDLOADS ARE REQUIRED TO BE CALCULATED USING | | ASCE7-02 OR WIND TUNNEL TESTING. SEE FBC 1609.1.1 | | | | 2) THE FBC TABLE NUMBERS REFERENCED ON THE ENGINEERING | | WERE CHANGED IN THE REVISIONS TO THE 2004 FBC. PLEASE | | NOTE. | | | | 3) THE DESIGN CRITERIA IN THE TITLE BLOCK OF THE | | DRAWINGS INCORRECTLY SPECIFY THE 2004 FBG. PLEASE | | CHANGE TO FBC. | | | | 4) PLEASE COORDINATE THE SIZE OF THE LETTERING ON THE | | FRONT AND SIDE VIEW DRAWINGS. FBC 106.1.1* CITY | | AMENDMENTS AND ZONING COMMENTS. | | | | 5) THE VALUE FOR THE WORK IS TOO LOW. FBC 108.3* CITY | | AMENDMENTS STATES THAT FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES | | VALUATION OF WORK INCLUDES DESIGN, ENGINEERING, LABOR, | | MATERIALS, ELECTRICAL, OVERHEAD AND PROFIT. THE VALUE | | OF THE WORK BASED ON MARSHALL AND SWIFT HAS BEEN | | DETERMINED AS $13,540.00. PLEASE PAY ADDITIONAL FEES. | | NOTE:A RECORDED COPY OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT | | WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | | ROBERT MCDOUGAL | | BLDG. PLAN REVIEW | | (561)805-6714 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-07-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-07-29 |
Time |
10:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-07-29 |
Time |
10:20 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-06-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-06-23 |
Time |
10:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-06-23 |
Time |
10:32 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-07-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-28 |
Time |
09:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-28 |
Time |
09:12 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2008-07-28 09:12:23 | TO "BTROBAUG" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-07-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-23 |
Time |
10:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-23 |
Time |
10:53 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2008-07-23 10:53:47 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-07-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-07-09 |
Time |
09:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rmcdouga |
Date |
2008-06-18 |
Time |
09:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-06-18 09:40:30 | TO "Z" BOX |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-07-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-07-25 |
Time |
16:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-07-25 |
Time |
16:08 |
Sent To |
I |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-06-19 |
Time |
09:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-06-19 |
Time |
09:48 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2008-06-19 11:06:39 | FAILED | | | | 1) THE SIGN BACKING'S DIMENSIONS ON THE FRONT VIEW IS | | LARGER THAN THE DIMENSIONS OF THE SIGN BACKING APPROVED | | IN THE CITYPLACE MASTER SIGN PLAN - THE SIGN BACKING IS | | APPROVED AS ONLY 7 FEET NOT 7'2" TALL AS SHOWN ON | | PERMIT. | | | | 2)ON THE FRONT VIEW THE DIMENSION LINE FOR THE | | OVERALL HEIGHT DOES NOT CORRESPOND TO THE EDGE OF THE | | SIGN BACKING. | | | | 3) THE OVERALL HEIGHT OF THE CHANNEL LETTERS IS SHOWN | | AS 67" ON THE FRONT VIEW AND 70" ON THE SIDE VIEW. | | THESE SHALL BE THE SAME. | | | | 4) PLEASE NOTE THAT SIGN LOCATION ON THE RENDERING | | PROVIDED WITH THE PERMIT AND THE ARCHITECTURAL | | ELEVATION PROVIDED WITH THE CITYPLACE MASTER SIGN PLAN | | SHOW THIS SIGN ON DIFFERING PLACES ALONG THE FACADE. | | THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION (INCLUDED WITH THIS COMMENT | | RESPONSE) SHOWS THE SIGN CLOSER TO THE NORTH CORNER | | THAN THE RENDERINGS.PLEASE VERIFY WITH YOUR CLIENT | | THE EXACT LOCATION THAT THEY WANT THE SIGN AND THEN | | PROVIDE THE APPROPRIATE LOCATION PLAN (WETHER THE | | RENDERING OR THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION. | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1435. |
|
|