Plan Review Stops For Permit 08030069 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-02-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-02-03 |
Time |
07:26 |
Rev Time |
0.79 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-02-03 |
Time |
07:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-02-03 07:34:17 | FIELD DIRECTIVE# 13 | | 1.1 CONTRACTOR SUPPLIED DETAIL# 1 DIAGONAL BRACING FOR | | INTERIOR (NON-STRUCTURAL) PARTITIONS. | | 1.2 CONTRACTOR SUPPLIED DETAIL# 2 POST TO DECK | | CONNECTIONDETAIL. | | | | FIELD DIRECTIVE# 11 | | 1.1 THIS FIELD DERECTIVE REPLACES FIELD DIRECTIVE# 9 | | ENTIRELY. | | 1.2 SKETCH 1OF 2 STOREFRONT DIAGONAL BRACING AT RIBS. | | THIS DETAIL IS TO MODIFY EXISTING CONNECTION TO MEET | | STOREFRONT WIND LOADINGREQUIREMENTS. SIGNED AND RAISED | | SEAL | | 1.3 SKETCH 2 OF 2 STOREFRONT DIAGONAL BRACING BETWEEN | | RIBS. THIS DETAIL IS TO MODIFY EXISTING CONNECTION TO | | MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS. SIGNED AND RAISED SEAL. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-01-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-01-14 |
Time |
10:03 |
Rev Time |
0.44 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-01-14 |
Time |
10:03 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2009-01-14 10:12:37 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 08030069 | | ADD: 700 S ROSEMARY "VICTORIA SECRETS" | | CONT: RCC | | TEL: (561)818-7777 | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | CONTRACTOR SUPPLIED DETAILS REVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | 1) FL 61G1-23.015 (2) THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR | | SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, | | SHOP DRAWINGS ETC... PLEASE HAVE THE ARCHITECT OF | | RECORD REVIEW SHOP DRAWINGS, STAMP THE DRAWINGS WITH | | THEIR SHOP DRAWING STAMP OF APPROVAL. | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)805-6731 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-01-14 |
Time |
10:02 |
Rev Time |
0.44 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-01-14 |
Time |
10:02 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2009-01-14 10:03:36 | OK- FIELD DIRECTIVE# 11 2 HEETS |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-01-02 |
Time |
17:50 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-01-02 |
Time |
17:00 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2009-01-02 17:54:27 | JAN. 02-2009 5:00-6:00PM | | EXPEDITED OVERTIME REVIEW: | | STOREFRONT CONNECTION DETAILS GLAZING SUPPORT DETAILS | | SKETCH B & C WITH SUPPORTING SCREW ATTACHMENT | | CALCULATIONS FOR WOOD & STEEL. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-01-02 |
Time |
12:18 |
Rev Time |
0.66 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2009-01-02 |
Time |
12:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-01-02 12:28:42 | FIELD DECECTIVE# 8 AND UL WALL LISTINGS |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-12-11 |
Time |
12:16 |
Rev Time |
2.22 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-12-11 |
Time |
12:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-01-02 12:17:46 | REVISION RELEASING CAPRI FROM PRIVATE PROVIDERS |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-07-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-07-01 |
Time |
14:30 |
Rev Time |
2.22 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-07-01 |
Time |
14:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-04-29 |
Time |
14:09 |
Rev Time |
2.22 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-04-29 |
Time |
14:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-29 14:10:24 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 08020069 | | ADD: 700 S ROSEMARY AV# 108 | | CONT: RCC ASSOCIATES INC | | TEL: (954)429-3700 | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | 2NDREVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | 1)2ND REQUEST, NO RESPONSE LETTERS WERE SUBMITTED. | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & | | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH | | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE | | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE | | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR | | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | 2-6) COMPLIED. | | | | 7) 2ND REQUEST,SHEET S04.1 DETAIL C,D & LPLEASE | | PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE FLOOR SHEATHING | | PRODUCT CONCRETE BONDED PARTICLE BOARD, PROVIDE THE | | THICKNESS OF THE PRODUCT SPAN RATINGS , ADDITIONAL | | INFORMATION REQUIRED 106.1.2. DURAROCK CEMENT BOARD, | | CCMC EVALUATION REPORT 10788-RUNDER USAGE AND | | LIMITATIONS DURAROCK CEMENT BOARD MAY BE USED AS A | | NON-STRUCTURALBACKER BOARD. PLEASE PROVIDE A REPORT | | INDICATING THIS PRODUCT CAN BE USED AS A STRUCTURAL | | COMPONENT. | | | | 8)2ND REQUEST, SHEET S04.1 PROVIDE COMPUTATIONS WITH AN | | AFFIDAVIT FROM THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER STATING THE | | SAFE ALLOWABLE FLOOR LOAD ON EACH FLOOR (DECK ABOVE | | RESTROOMS) IN POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT UNIFORMLY | | DISTRIBUTED. 110.4.2. | | | | 110.4.3 SIGN REQUIRED, IN EVERY BUILDING OR PART OF | | BUILDING USED FOR STORAGE THE SAFE FLOOR LOADS AS | | REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL ON THE PLANS, SHALL | | BE MARKED ON PLATES OF APPROVED DESIGN WHICH SHALL BE | | SUPPLIED AND SECURELY AFFIXED BY THE OWNER OF THE | | BUILDING IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE IN EVERY STORY WHICH IT | | RELATES. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-03-21 |
Time |
07:35 |
Rev Time |
4.55 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-03-18 |
Time |
11:41 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2008-03-21 07:36:54 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 08020069 | | ADD: 700 S ROSEMARY AV# 108 | | CONT: RCC ASSOCIATES INC | | TEL: (954)429-3700 | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | REVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | | | | | 1A)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & | | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH | | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE | | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE | | FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR | | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | 1B)PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, PLANS, REPORTS, | | REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR SUBMITTALS FOR | | REVIEW FOR PERMIT. | | IF YOUR PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A RESIDENT INSPECTOR OR IF | | YOUR PROJECT IS A THRESHOLD BUILDING REQUIRING A | | THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN (3) THREE SETS OF ALL SAID | | DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. 106.1* | | /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTSWEST PALM BEACH | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | | 1C) 106.1.1* W.P.B. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE/2004 | | DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN | | THE FORM OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF | | MATERIALS, WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY | | WITH THE TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE | | SPECIFIC TO THE TECHNICAL CODES "SHALL NOT BE CITED AS | | A WHOLE OR IN PART, NOR THE TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS | | EQUIVALENT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC | | INFORMATION". CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE | | SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND | | EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT | | WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND | | RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS | | DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | | 1D) FL S. S. 713.13NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE | | FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT.NOTE: 713.13(2) IF | | THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS NOT | | ACTUALLY COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING | | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) | | THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE | | CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. | | | | 1E) PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT (FIRST TIME REVIEW) | | AFTER JULY 1ST, 2007 SHALL BE REVIEWED TO THE 2004 FBC | | BUILDING WITH THE 2007 SUPPLEMENTS. | | | | 2) ARCHITECT CHRIS DOERSCHLAG IS MISSING THE FOLLOWING | | INFORMATION IN THE TITLE BLOCK. | | 61G1-16.004FL. ADMIN. CODE.PLANS PREPARED BY A | | REGISTERED ARCHITECT SHALL INCLUDE A TITLE BLOCK WHICH | | MUST: | | - STATE THE FIRM NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE | | NUMBER | | - STATE THE FIRM LICENSE NUMBER | | XX - STATE PROJECT NAME OR IDENTIFICATION SUITE NUMBER | | - STATE DATE PREPARED | | XX - INCLUDE AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND DATED SEAL - | | INCLUDE THE PRINTED NAME OF THE | | ARCHITECT & SEAL NUMBER SEALING THE PLANS. | | | | 3)SHEET A00.3 CODE SYNOPSIS PLEASE CORRECT THE | | CORRELATION FROM THE 2001 FBC TYPE | | II SPRINKLED FROM 2004 FBC TYPE II-A TO 2004 FBC TYPE | | I-B, SEE CODE COMMENTARY | | FIGURE 600. | | | | 4) SHEET A00.3 KEY NOTES REFERS TO THE SSMA (STEEL STUD | | MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION) | | AS THE REFERENCEDSTANDARD. PLEASE SEE TABLE 2508.1 | | STEEL FRAMING FOR GYPSUM BOARD. | | ASTM C 754 FOR NON-LOAD BEARING WALLS 5.3.1.2/ NOTE 1 | | REFERS TO APPENDIX X1. | | ASTM C 1007 FOR LOAD BEARING WALLS. | | GA -216 | | | | 5)A01.1 DEMOLITION NOTE 15 IS STRUCK THROUGH | | APPEARING TO REMOVE IT FROM THE SCOPE OF WORK, BUT | | A02.1 INDICATES A NEW DOORWAY AND RATED WALLS. | | DISCREPANCY, PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, | | 106.1.2. PROVIDE RATING OF DOOR AND WALL. | | | | 6) A01.1 DEMOLITION NOTE 23 INDICATES TWO DOORS ARE TO | | BE WELDED SHUT, PLEASE SEE NFPA 80- 5.2.4 (3)DOOR , | | FRAME HINGES, HARDWARE AND NONCOMBUSTIBLE THRESHOLD ARE | | SECURED, ALIGNED AND IN WORKING ORDER WITH NO VISIBLE | | SIGNS OF DAMAGE. | | | | | | NFPA 80- 5.2.4.2 (10) NO FIELD MODIFICATIONS TO THE | | DOOR ASSEMBLY HAVE BEEN PREFORMED THAT VOID THE LABEL. | | | | 7)SHEET S04.1 DETAIL C,D & LPLEASE PROVIDE | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE FLOOR SHEATHING PRODUCT | | CONCRETE BONDED PARTICLE BOARD, PROVIDE THE THICKNESS | | OF THE PRODUCT SPAN RATINGS AND FIRE RATING IS THIS | | PRODUCT FIRE RETARDANT TREATED, ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | | REQUIRED 106.1.2. | | | | 8) SHEET S04.1 PROVIDE COMPUTATIONS WITH AN AFFIDAVIT | | FROM THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER STATING THE SAFE | | ALLOWABLE FLOOR LOAD ON EACH FLOOR (DECK ABOVE | | RESTROOMS) IN POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT UNIFORMLY | | DISTRIBUTED. 110.4.2. | | | | 110.4.3 SIGN REQUIRED, IN EVERY BUILDING OR PART OF | | BUILDING USED FOR STORAGE THE SAFE FLOOR LOADS AS | | REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL ON THE PLANS, SHALL | | BE MARKED ON PLATES OF APPROVED DESIGN WHICH SHALL BE | | SUPPLIED AND SECURELY AFFIXED BY THE OWNER OF THE | | BUILDING IN A CONSPICUOUS PLACE IN EVERY STORY WHICH IT | | RELATES. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-02-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-02-05 |
Time |
13:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-02-05 |
Time |
13:12 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2009-02-05 13:12:50 | NO GROSS ERRORS |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-01-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-01-28 |
Time |
13:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2009-01-28 |
Time |
13:59 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2009-01-28 13:59:44 | ** DENIED PLANS/REVISIONS** | | | | 1) NOTE: SEE THE NOTES FROM THE PREVIOUS ELECTRICAL | | REVIEW. THE METHOD *C* CALCULATIONS ARE STILL BEING | | SUBMITTED. THESE MAY HAVE BEEN LEFT OVER FROM PREVIOUS | | REVIEW AND SHOULD BE REMOVED. | | THE NEW SUBMITTED METHOD *B* IS NOT SEALED BY THE | | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL AS REQUIRED. FS 471.025/ FAC | | 61G15-23.002, FBC 13-101 | | THE NEW THE METHOD *B* DOES NOT HAVE ANY INPUT DATA | | REPORT ATTACHED TO THE SUMMARY SHEETS. THIS WAS ALSO A | | COMMENT FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW. THE COMPLIANCE | | SUMMARY SHEET #2 STATES THE * INPUT DATA REPORT MUST BE | | SUBMITTED*. IN ORDER FOR CODE COMPLIANCE REVIEW TO TAKE | | PLACE THIS OFFICE MUST HAVE THE IDR TO REVIEW WITH THE | | SUBMITTED PLANS. | | | | 2) NOTE: THE BEAUTY CASES ARE NOT MANUFACTURED WITH | | LIGHTING INSTALLED FROM THE MANUFACTURE. BASED ON THE | | PRODUCT SHEETS SUBMITTED THESE ARE LIGHT FIXTURES ADDED | | TO GENERAL DISPLAY CASES/RACKS.13-415.2.ABC.1. THERE IS | | ALLOWANCES PERMITTED FOR ADDITIONAL LIGTHING FOR | | DSIPLAY AREAS HOWEVER SEE 13-415.2.B.2. PLEASE | | RE-CONFIGURE CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT ** | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED | | INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-12-24 |
Time |
14:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-12-24 |
Time |
14:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-12-24 14:11:22 | ** DENIED REVIEW OF REVISIONS** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: METHOD *C* FLA-COMM SUBMITTED DOES NOT CONTAIN | | ANY INPUT DATA REPORT. THE DESIGN WATTAGE IS HIGHER | | THAN ALLOWANCE PER FBC 13-415.2.ABC.1.1,.1.2, TABLE | | 13-415.2.C. | | PLEASE SEE PLANS WHICH CONTAINS METHOD *B* TABLE | | 13-415.2.B FOR COMPLIANCE WHICH HAS NOT BEEN UPDATED | | FOR CHANGES IN LIGHTING ON PLANS. | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1. IT IS NOT PERMISSIBLE BY | | CODE TO USE MULTIPLE METHODS OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO | | TRY AND ACHIEVE CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | | ** PLEASE SUBMIT MANUFACTURES SPECS/CUT SHEETS FOR | | BEAUTY CASES IN WHICH EXEMPTION IN 13-415.2.ABC.1 IS | | BEING APPLIED. | | 110.3, 90.7. | | FBC 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2. | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE UPDATE AND REVISED | | PLANS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. THE INPUT DATA REPORT AS | | STATED ON SHEET TWO OF THE SUBMITTED CALCULATIONS MUST | | ACCOMPANY THE SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS. NO REVIEW FOR CODE | | COMPLIANCE CAN BE ACHIEVED. | | FBC 106.1.1 FOR COMPLETE INFORMATION, CLARITY AND | | COORDINATION. | | CODE SECTIONS NOTED IN NOTE #1. | | | | 3) NOTE: FEE DUE FOR ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED AS A | | SUBMITTAL. THIS IS ACTUALLY A REVISION TO BE REVIEWED | | AND COORDINATED WITH PLANS SUBMITTED. | | | | 4) NOTE: LETTERS SUBMITTED BY CITY PLACE AND RCC WERE | | NOT CORRECTLY NOTARIZED PER FS 117.05. PLACING THE | | NOTARY STAMP ON LETTER AND SIGNING IS NOT THE ONLY | | INFORMATION REQUIRED. LETTER FROM RCC DOES CONTAIN SOME | | MORE INFORMATION HOWEVER NOT ALL. A COMPLETED STATEMENT | | IN SECTION GIVEN CAN BE VIEWED ON LINE AT STATE | | WEBSITE. THE INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN SECTION | | 117.05(12)(B). | | | | | | **IMPORTANT** | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED | | INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-08-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-08-14 |
Time |
14:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-08-14 |
Time |
14:01 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2008-08-14 14:02:29 | METHOD B CALCS SENT BACK WITH ALL OLD/VOIDED DOCUMENTS | | AS THE PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS ARE SHOWN ON PLANS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-06-26 |
Time |
17:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-06-26 |
Time |
17:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-06-26 17:03:35 | ** DENIED3RD AUDIT ** | | | | | | 1) NOTE:PLEASE SEE THE SUBMITTED FLA-COM ENERGY | | CALCULATIONS STATES METHOD *C* HOWEVER PLEASE SEE | | 13-415.2.C, 13-415.2.C.1. THE SUBMITTED CALCULATIONS | | ARE NOT CODE COMPLIANT BASED ON *C* AS METHOD C FOR | | AREA ONLY ALLOWS 1.5 WATTS/PER/SQFT. | | BASED ON THE SQUARE FOOTAGE THIS WOULD BE SUBSTANTIALLY | | LOWER THAN THE DESIGN WATTAGE OF JUST OVER | | 18,000WATTS. | | THE OTHER ITEM IS THE SHEET ON PLANS SHOWS SPACE BY | | SPACE FOR METHOD *B*.PLEASE SEE THE SALES AREA AS A | | TOTAL IS SHOWING 2.1 WATTS/PER/SQFT ALLOWANCE WHICH | | EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWANCES ON TABLE 13-415.2.B. | | PLEASE LOOK AT SALES AREAS ON THE TABLE WHICH HAS A | | BASE ALLOWANCE OF 1.7, NOT 2.1. | | WHICH IS GOING TO BE USED? | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2, .1.3. | | | | BASED ON ALL CODE SECTIONS GIVEN ABOVE AND BASED ON THE | | FACT THE LIGHTING DESIGN IS SUBSTANTIALLY OVER THE | | MAXIMUM ALLOWANCES ALLOWED BY THE CODE. | | THIS AUDIT SHALL BE PLACED INTO A FAILED STATUS FOR THE | | THIRD TIME. | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AREAS AROUND DRESSING ROOMS. WHERE | | IS THE LIGHTING CONTROL? THIS IS ONE EXAMPLE. | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3 FOR ALL | | REQUIRED CONTROLS ONCE AGAIN. | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ONE SET OF THE SUBMITTED FLA COM | | CALCULATIONS WERE INDEED PHOTO-COPIES AND NOTE | | ORIGINAL. | | FAC 61G15-23.002, FS 471.025 | | | | ** PLEASE KNOW ELECTRICAL LIGHTING SHEETS, ELECTRICAL | | SHEETS WITH LIGHTING CALCULATIONS AS WELL AS FLACOM | | CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE. | | | | ** A CALL WAS PLACED TO THE ENGINEERED SIGNED AND | | SEALED ON PLANS AS OF THIS REVIEW. MR. VAN STRATEN WAS | | IN NEED OF LOCATING THE ELECTRICAL DESIGNER WHO WORKED | | ON PROJECT.HE WAS NOT ABLE TO GO OVER COMMENTS. | | | | | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-05-05 |
Time |
10:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-05-05 |
Time |
10:13 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2008-05-05 10:14:07 | ** DENIEDAUDIT ** | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE NOTICE TO BUILDING OFFICIAL | | NEEDS TO COORDINATE WITH THE SIGNED AFFIDAVITS. PLEASE | | SEE THESE SHOW SEPARATE PRIVATE PROVIDERS AS THE | | RESPONSIBLE ENGINEERS. | | PLEASE SUBMIT. | | FS 553.791 | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE AFFIDAVITS DO NOT LIST THE | | ENERGY/PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS. | | FS553.791 | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ONLY ONE COPY OF THE CALCULATIONS | | DATED 2/4/08 WERE SUBMITTED. | | PLEASE SEE THE SUBMITTED INPUT DATA REPORT WHICH | | FOLLOWS DOES NOT CORRELATE WITH LIGHTING ON PLANS. IN | | FACT THERE ARE SEVERAL LIGHT FIXTURES ON PLANS WHICH | | ARE NOT ON THE IDR. | | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE: PLANS CLEARLY SHOW EXTERIOR | | LIGHTS, HOWEVER THE IDR DO NOT INDICATE ANY LIGHTS. | | THIS IS ACTUALLY BLANK. | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1.3. | | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE: | | TRACK LIGHTS ARE NOT SHOWN PER 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2. | | | | ** THESE ARE ONLY SOME EXAMPLES AND IS NOT AN EXHAUSTED | | LIST OF ALL ITEMS WHICH DO NOT CORRELATE WITH PLANS. | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AS STATED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW. THERE | | IS NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION FOR REVIEW OF THE REQUIRED | | LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEM. THE RESPONSE LETTER STATES | | THREE OVER RIDES WERE ADDED HOWEVER WHERE ARE THE | | LIGHTING CONTROLS REQUIRED PER 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2, | | .1.3 AND .1.4? | | THERE ARE A COUPLE OF NOTES ON PLANS WHICH MENTIONS | | THERE WILL BE SOME SORT OF LIGHTING CONTROLS HOWEVER | | PLACING NOTES ON PLANS IN LIEU OF SHOWING CODE | | COMPLIANCE IS NOT PERMITTED. | | THE RESPONSE LETTER ALSO STATES IT IS *NOT CAPABLE* TO | | SHOW ZONES. THIS OFFICE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND HOW MEETING | | * MINIMUM REQUIRED* BY CODE IS NOT POSSIBLE. | | ONE AGAIN PLEASE SHOW COMPLETE LIGHTING CONTROL(S) | | SYSTEM(S) PER SECTIONS GIVEN ABOVE. | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SECTION NOTED ABOVE FOR EXTERIOR | | LIGHTS PER 13-415.1.ABC.1.4. | | PLEASE COMPLETE WITH ONE OF THE TWO MINIMUM REQUIRED BY | | CODE. | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COMMENT #9 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW. | | PLEASE SEE ONCE AGAIN THESE ARE *STANDARD SWITCHES* | | BEING NOTED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. | | SEE NOTE #4 ABOVE. | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTICE TO FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH | | RESPECT TO REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE IS | | GIVEN. | | FS 553.80(2)(B) IS APPLICABLE TO ANY PROJECT AS IT IS | | FOR THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL WITH RESPECT TO REPEAT | | COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | | | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY | | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE | | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. | | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-03-08 |
Time |
23:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-03-08 |
Time |
23:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-03-08 23:40:43 | 2008-03-08 23:40:43 | | | | ** DENIED REVIEW ** | | | | *** PLEASE KNOW THAT SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS ARE NOT | | COMPLETE AT THIS TIME. | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COVER SHEET A0.00 WHICH STATES | | NFPA-70 2005 AS THE SPRINKLER CODE WHEN NFPA-70 IS THE | | NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE. PLEASE SEE THIS SAME COVER | | SHEET STATES NFPA-101 2003 ALSO AS THE SPRINKLER CODE | | WHICH IS ALSO NOT POSSIBLE. THE 2003 NFPA-101 IS THE | | LIFE SAFETY CODE. | | PLEASE ADJUST ON COVER SHEET AND IN PLANS AS NEEDED. | | PLEASE BE SURE THE FOLLOWING RELEVANT CODES ARE STATED | | ON ELECTRICAL PLANS. | | 2005 NFPA-70 | | 2003 NFPA-101 | | 2002 NFPA-72 | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE FLA-COM ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | SUBMITTED WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN ANY INPUT DATA REPORT. | | PLEASE SEE SHEET WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THE IDR MUST | | BE SUBMITTED. A REVIEW OF COORDINATION WITH THE ACTUAL | | ITEMS ON PLANS CAN NOT BE DONE AT THIS TIME WITHOUT | | THESE SHEETS. | | PLEASE BE SURE TO CORRELATE ALL LIGHTING ON PLANS WITH | | THE IDR WHEN RESUBMITTING. PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE | | 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2, .1.3. | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1( TRACK LTS, AND OTHER | | SPECIALTY LIGHTING SYSTEMS) | | ** PLEASE SEE ANY COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES WITH | | RESPECT TO THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED. | | ** PLEASE BE SURE THE DESIGNER OF RECORD SIGNS DATES | | AND SEALS THE CERTIFICATION SHEETS ALONG WITH THE | | SIGNATURE FROM THE OWNER AGENT. | | FS 471.025, FBC 13-103.1.1.1 | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING PRINTED NAME AND PRINTED | | LICENSE NUMBER IS LISTED ON TITLE BLOCKS AS REQUIRED | | PER FAC 61G15-23.002 | | ** THIS IS REQUIRED FOR ALL TRADES AND ALL REVIEWS | | WHETHER OR NOT COMMENT IS MADE BY THOSE OTHER TRADES. | | ** PLEASE KNOW FOR ANY SHEETS WHICH DO NOT NEED TO BE | | RE-PRINTED FOR COMMENTS, THIS MAY BE NEATLY PRINTED OR | | STAMPED ON TITLE BLOCKS. | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PLANS APPEAR TO BE SIGNED WITH | | INITIALS. PLEASE PROVIDE AN ORIGINAL NOTARIZED LETTER | | FOR SIGNATURE VERIFICATION. THIS WILL BE PLACED IN | | SIGNATURE FILE FOR FUTURE REFERENCE. | | FS 471.025 | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE UNIT AS STATED ON TITLE BLOCKS | | IS SHOWN AS *B-5* WHEN THE ACTUAL SUITE/UNIT NUMBER AT | | LOCATION IS #108. PLEASE ADJUST TITLE BLOCKS. | | ** ONCE AGAIN FOR SHEETS WHICH MAY NOT NEED TO BE | | REVISED FOR COMMENTS THIS MAY BE NEATLY PRINTED OR | | STAMPED ON THE TITLE BLOCKS. | | FAC 61G1-16.004, 61G15-23.002, FBC ADMIN SECTION 106.5 | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 11-4.28.1,.2 AND .3(4). PLEASE | | SEE THE MINIMUM LEVELS FOR ADA COMPLIANCE FOR ALL | | STROBE DEVICES SHALL MEET 75CD MINIMUM. PLEASE SEE THE | | LEVELS FOR THE HORN/STROBES INDICATE 75CD HOWEVER ALL | | STROBES ARE SHOWN AS 15CD WHICH IS WAY BELOW MINIMUM. | | PLEASE ADJUST. | | PLEASE SEE SOUND LEVELS ALSO WHICH MAY | | | | 7) NOTE:PLEASE ADJUST THE COLOR CODING FOR 277/480V | | SYSTEMS TO BROWN, PURPLE AND YELLOW. | | THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AND ALL SURROUNDING | | JURISDICTIONS CONTAINED LOCAL AMENDMENTS FOR THE LAST | | 20PLUS YEARS WHICH HAD THE ABOVE COLORING CODING. EVEN | | AS THE TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS ARE NOT LONGER IN AFFECT | | KEEPING WITH ALL OTHER WIRING SYSTEMS ALREADY PRESENT | | IN THIS JURISDICTION AS WELL KEEPING WITH THE | | ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS ALREADY ON SITE THE ABOVE WILL BE | | REQUIRED.THE NEC ONLY PROVIDES ORANGE FOR A HIGH-LEG | | OPEN DELTA SYSTEMS, WHICH 277/480V IS NOT. AS THE NEC | | DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY COLOR CODING THIS IS PER AHJ AS A | | LIFE SAFETY, FIRE HAZARD, AND PROPERTY DAMAGE SAFETY | | MEASURE. | | 90.4. | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE VERIFY THE NOTE #3 IN SECTION 26 51 00 | | ON SHEET E01.1 WHICH STATES ** THE ENERGY POLICY ACT OF | | 1992*?? | | PLEASE KNOW THAT ANY ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE MEASURES | | SHALL BE ACCORDANCE WITH THE FLORIDA ENERGY CODE | | CHAPTER 13. | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SECTION 26 27 28 FOR SWITCHING | | DEVICES DOES NOT APPLY. | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2, .1.3 AND | | .1.4. | | PLEASE SEE THAT NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION WAS SUBMITTED | | FOR LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEM. | | PLEASE SHOW ALL OVER RIDE DEVICE LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED. | | FOR EXAMPLE REAR ENTRANCE. OCCUPANT IS REQUIRED TO | | VISUALLY SEE THE LIGHTING BEING CONTROLLED OR MEETING | | THE EXCEPTION OF PILOT LIGHTS ETC. | | PLEASE PROVIDE TIMED SCHEDULING AND MAXIMUM OVER RIDE | | TIMES. | | PLEASE SHOW A LAYOUT OF ZONES REQUIRED. | | ** PLEASE KNOW AS NOTED ABOVE REVIEW FOR LIGHTING | | COMPLIANCE CAN NOT BE DONE.SEE NOTE ABOVE #2 | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE CODE SECTIONS REFLECTED IN THE | | LOAD CALCULATIONS ARE NOT UNDER THE CURRENT NFPA-70 | | (NEC). | | PLEASE SEE SHOW WINDOWS ARE NOW IN 220.43. (PLANS | | REFLECT 220.12) | | | | 13) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW DEPENDING ON THE STRUCTURAL SCOPE | | OF WORK, THREE SETS OF PLANS MAY BE REQUIRED AS THIS IS | | A THRESHOLD BUILDING. THIS IS ONLY NOTED ONLY FOR | | INFORMATION. | | | | 14) NOTE: PLEASE VERIFY BUS RATING OF PANELS A, B AND C | | AS THESE ARE SHOWN AS 100A YET 42CIR PANELS. 110.3, | | 90.7. | | SUBMIT SPEC SHEET. | | FBC 106.1.2 | | | | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY | | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE | | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. | | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | DELAYS. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2009-02-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-02-02 |
Time |
14:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2009-02-02 |
Time |
14:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-02-02 14:43:37 | *****REVISION DENIED**** | | | | PLAN SHEETS A00.4, F01.1, F02.2, AND F0.4 WERE STAMPED, | | INITIALED, AND DATED; HOWEVER THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS, | | WITH SUGGESTION(S), ARE TO BE ADDRESSED: | | | | 1. NO TENANT SPACE NUMBER SHOWN ON THE EXTERIOR | | ELEVATION FRONTING SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE. AS PER WEST | | PALM BEACH CODE, THE NUMBERS SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 3" | | IN HEIGHT AND NO LESS THAN 1" IN WIDTH/STROKE. DISPLAY | | SUITE NUMBER (108) ON SHEET A08.1 & A08.1A | | | | 2. SHEETS E03.1 & E03.2 ARE TO BE FIRE-STAMPED. THESE | | SHEETS ARE TO BE FIRE-STAMPED WHEN THE ELECTRICAL | | EXAMINER'S COMMENT HAVE BEEN SATISFIED | | | | 3. THE REVISED COVER SHEET DOES NOT INDICATE THAT | | DRAWING F01.2 HAS BEEN VOIDED (LINED THRU) AS SHOWN IN | | THE CITY'S FILED PLAN SET. VERIFY/CLARIFY AS NECESSARY | | | | 4. WHAT IS BEING VOIDED ON OR TO DRAWING F02.1 IN THE | | REVISED PLANS. | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-12-16 |
Time |
14:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-12-16 |
Time |
14:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-12-16 14:27:19 | ***DENIED*** | | | | 1) SOME OF THE FIRE PROTECTION SHEETS SUBMITTED HAVE | | BEEN VOIDED WITH NO EXPLANATION. IN ADDITION TO THIS | | SUBMITTAL, SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS AND PERMITS ARE | | REQUIRED FOR FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS | | PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. INDICATE MINIMUM REQUIRED LEVELS | | FOR AUDIBLE AND VISUAL DEVICES. | | | | | | | | MIKE WENNERGREN, ASST. FIRE MARSHAL | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | FIRE PREVENTION (561) 804-4756 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-04-30 |
Time |
09:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-04-30 |
Time |
09:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-30 09:55:01 | COMMENTS FROM FIRST FIRE REVIEW HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-03-20 |
Time |
19:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-03-20 |
Time |
18:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-03-20 18:49:08 | *****DENIED***** | | | | | | 1.THE CODES LISTED ON COVER SHEET ARE INCORRECT; | | REFERENCE SHOULD BE AS FOLLOWS:*FIRE ALARM - 2002 | | NFPA 72,*LIFE SAFETY - 2003 NFPA 101, *SPRINKLER - | | 2002 NFPA 13 | | | | 2.STRUCTURES UNDERGOING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, OR | | DEMOLITION OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 241. | | | | 3.THE SCOPE OF WORK SHALL NOT INTERFERE/HINDER ACCESS | | TO AND (OR) EGRESS FROM THE PROPERTY OR VICINITY | | THEREOF (INCLUDING STREETS, ALLEYS, FIRELANES, ETC). | | | | 4.COMBUSTIBLE WASTE MATERIALS, DUST, AND DEBRIS SHALL | | BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AT THE END OF EACH SHIFT OR | | MORE FREQUENTLY AS NECESSARY FOR SAFE OPERATION. | | | | 5.ON THE APPROPIATE EXTERIOR ELEVATION WHICH FRONTS | | SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE, SHOW/DISPLAY THE SUITE NUMBER | | FOR THIS TENANT SPACE.AS PER WEST PALM BEACH CODE, | | SUITE NUMBERS SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 3" IN HEIGHT AND NO | | LESS THAN 1" IN WIDTH. | | | | 6.SPECIFY THE INTERIOR FINISH MATERIALS FOR THE WALL | | AND CEILINGS IN TERMS OF CLASS A OR CLASS B. | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER INDICATING WHERE ON THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET | | EACH COMMENT IS ADDRESSED | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
15 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-02-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-10 |
Time |
08:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-10 |
Time |
08:29 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2009-02-10 08:30:08 | TO "M" BOX/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
14 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-02-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-04 |
Time |
16:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-04 |
Time |
16:34 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2009-02-04 16:34:48 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
13 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-02-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-02 |
Time |
08:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-02-02 |
Time |
08:31 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2009-02-02 08:31:28 | TO "JWITMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
12 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-01-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-01-22 |
Time |
09:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-01-22 |
Time |
09:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-01-22 09:53:08 | TO "KSTEVENS" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
11 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-01-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-01-21 |
Time |
16:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-01-21 |
Time |
16:36 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2009-01-21 16:36:50 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
10 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-01-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-01-12 |
Time |
16:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2009-01-12 |
Time |
16:56 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2009-01-12 16:57:00 | TO "JWITMER" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
9 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2009-01-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2009-01-02 |
Time |
16:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2009-01-02 |
Time |
16:29 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2009-01-02 16:29:21 | TO "JWITMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-12-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-18 |
Time |
09:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-18 |
Time |
09:45 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2008-12-18 09:46:10 | TO "JWITMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-12-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-15 |
Time |
11:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-15 |
Time |
11:41 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2008-12-15 11:41:52 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-12-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-03 |
Time |
09:23 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-03 |
Time |
09:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-12-03 09:23:18 | TO "COMM" BD#45--EXPEDITED-- |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-08-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-08-01 |
Time |
11:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-08-01 |
Time |
11:08 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2008-08-01 11:08:51 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-07-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-14 |
Time |
09:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-14 |
Time |
09:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-07-14 09:45:20 | TO "COMM" BD#25/ PLANS ON RACK--PRIVATE PROVIDER-- |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-06-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-19 |
Time |
08:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-19 |
Time |
08:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-06-19 08:51:39 | TO "COMM" BD#35/PLANS ON RACK/1 ROLL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-04-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-24 |
Time |
08:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-24 |
Time |
08:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-24 08:24:29 | TO"COMM"BD#41-PLANS ON RAC/-PRIVATE PROVIDER/1 ROLL, 2 | | LARGE FOLDED PLANS |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-03-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-03-20 |
Time |
18:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-03-05 |
Time |
09:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-03-05 09:45:00 | | | --PRIVATE PROVIDER-- | | | | TO "COMM" BD#13/PLANS ON RACK/3 ROLLS |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-01-11 |
Time |
11:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2009-01-11 |
Time |
11:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-01-11 11:39:44 | *******PROVISO********* | | RETURN DUCT NEAR FRONT ENTRANCE IS MISSING DUCT SIZE ON | | PLANS. REVISE PLAN TO SHOW THE MISSING SIZE PRIOR TO | | FINAL MECHANICAL INSPECTION. FBCM 603.1 | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | 561.805.6719 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-04-28 |
Time |
10:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-04-28 |
Time |
10:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-03-12 |
Time |
16:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-03-12 |
Time |
13:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-03-12 16:06:37 | REVIEW #: 1ST | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | 1. OUTSIDE AIR OR VENTILATION CALCULATIONS COULD NOT BE | | FOUND ON PLANS. THE MINIMUM VENTILATION RATE OF | | REQUIRED OUTDOOR AIR SHALL BE DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE | | WITH SECTION 403.3. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS SHOWING | | OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATIONS, OCCUPANT LOADS, VENTILATION | | RATE REQUIRED AND VENTILATION PROVIDED FOR EACH SPACE | | WITHIN THE PROPOSED WORK AREA IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM | | TABLE 403.3. | | | | 2. AHU SCHEDULE INDICATES THAT OUTSIDE AIR IS BEING | | PROVIDED. ONCE VENTILATION RATES HAVE BEEN VERIFIED IN | | RELATION TO COMMENT #1, PLEASE VERIFY THAT SUPPLY, | | RETURN AND EXHAUST SYSTEMS ARE IN BALANCE. THE AMOUNT | | OF SUPPLY AIR SHALL BE APPROXIMATELY EQUAL TO THE | | AMOUNT OF RETURN AND EXHAUST AIR IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | FBCM 403.1. IN OTHER WORDS, FOR THE SYSTEM TO BE | | BALANCED THE SUPPLY SHOULD BE APPROXIMATELY EQUAL TO | | THE RETURN MINUS THE EXHAUST PLUS THE OUTSIDE AIR, WITH | | A SLIGHT DIFFERENCE TO THE POSITIVE TO BE IN COMPLIANCE | | WITH THIS SECTION AND FBCB 13-409.1.ABC.2. EXAMPLE: AHU | | 2 ON FLOOR PLAN CALLS FOR 4410 CFM SUPPLY AND 4165 CFM | | RETURN. THAT LEAVES A DIFFERENCE OF 235 CFM. THE AHU | | SCHEDULE CALLS FOR 1371 CFM OF OUTSIDE AIR. IT?S NOT | | POSSIBLE TO INTRODUCE MORE OUTSIDE AIR THAN THE | | DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE SUPPLY AND RETURN(IN THIS CASE | | 235 CFM). PLEASE CORRECT AIR BALANCES, KEEPING IN MIND | | THE REQUIRED VENTILATION RATES RELATED TO COMMENT #1. | | | | 3. SHUTOFF DAMPER CONTROLS ARE REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE | | WITH FBCB 13-409.1.ABC.3.3. BOTH OUTDOOR AIR SUPPLY AND | | EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH MOTORIZED | | DAMPERS THAT WILL AUTOMATICALLY SHUT WHEN THE SYSTEMS | | OR SPACES SERVED ARE NOT IN USE. GRAVITY | | (NON-MOTORIZED) DAMPERS ARE ACCEPTABLE IN BUILDING | | EXHAUST AIR SYSTEMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH EXCEPTION #1 OF | | THIS SECTION. IT IS ACKNOWLEDGED THAT MOTORIZED DAMPERS | | ARE CALLED FOR IN THE AHU SEQUENCE ON PG M04.1, BUT | | THESE DAMPERS ARE NOT SHOWN ON PLANS. PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | 4.EACH SHEET OF PLANS AND PRINTS WHICH MUST BE SEALED | | UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 471, F.S., SHALL BE | | SEALED, SIGNED AND DATED BY THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER | | IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE. ENGINEERS SHALL LEGIBLY INDICATE | | THEIR NAME, ADDRESS, AND LICENSE NUMBER ON EACH SHEET | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAC 61G15-23.002(2). THE FULL LEGAL | | SIGNATURE OF THE DESIGNER OF RECORD SHOULD ALSO BE | | USED. THESE PLANS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN SIGNED WITH AN | | INITIAL. PLEASE VERIFY THAT THIS IS THE DESIGNER'S FULL | | SIGNATURE PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL. SEE SIMILAR COMMENTS | | FROM OTHER TRADES. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | 561.805.6719 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-01-22 |
Time |
18:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-01-22 |
Time |
18:06 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2009-01-22 18:07:24 | REVISIONS OK -- SHTS P01.1, P02.1, P02.2 & P03.1. |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-12-15 |
Time |
14:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-12-15 |
Time |
14:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-12-15 15:03:30 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | 1. SHT P01.1 REVISIONS 3A, 3B, & 4 WERE NOT INDICATED | | ON THE SHEET AS REVISIONS. THE ONLY CLOUD IS FOR | | REVISION 5 AND IT INDICATES THE COMPLETE SHEET. UNLESS | | ALL INFORMATION ON THE SHEET HAS BEEN REVISED, ONLY | | CLOUD AND NUMBER EACH REVISION ONLY ON THE SHEET. | | SECTION 106.1.3. | | | | 2. SHT P02.1 REVISIONS 3B & 4 WERE NOT INDICATED ON THE | | SHEET AS REVISIONS. THE ONLY CLOUD IS FOR REVISION 5 | | AND IT INDICATES THE COMPLETE SHEET. UNLESS ALL | | INFORMATION ON THE SHEET HAS BEEN REVISED, ONLY CLOUD | | AND NUMBER EACH REVISION ONLY ON THE SHEET. SECTION | | 106.1.3. | | | | 3. SHT P02.2 REVISIONS 3B & 4 WERE NOT INDICATED ON THE | | SHEET AS REVISIONS. THE ONLY CLOUD IS FOR REVISION 5 | | AND IT INDICATES THE COMPLETE SHEET. UNLESS ALL | | INFORMATION ON THE SHEET HAS BEEN REVISED, ONLY CLOUD | | AND NUMBER EACH REVISION ONLY ON THE SHEET. SECTION | | 106.1.3. | | | | 4. SHT P03.1 REVISIONS 3A, 3B, & 4 WERE NOT INDICATED | | ON THE SHEET AS REVISIONS. THE ONLY CLOUD IS FOR | | REVISION 5 AND IT INDICATES THE COMPLETE SHEET. UNLESS | | ALL INFORMATION ON THE SHEET HAS BEEN REVISED, ONLY | | CLOUD AND NUMBER EACH REVISION ONLY ON THE SHEET. | | SECTION 106.1.3. | | | | 5. THIS OFFICE WAS UNABLE TO GLEAN ALL THE INFORMATION | | REQUIRED ON THE SEAL BY FAC 61G15-23.001(1)(2) & FS | | 471.025. PLEASE RESEAL ALL SHEETS SO THAT EMBOSSING | | INFORMATION IS LEGIBLE. | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-07-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-06-27 |
Time |
12:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-06-27 |
Time |
12:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-04-25 |
Time |
06:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-04-25 |
Time |
06:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-25 06:22:19 | AUDIT DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS AUDIT: | | | | 1.ALL ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS. THE PRINTED NAME OF THE | | PERSON SEALING THE PLANS IS REQUIRED. THE SIGNATURE OF | | THE PERSON SEALING THE DOCUMENTS IS REQUIRED. FAC | | 61G1-16.003, 61G1-16.004(5)(6) & FS 481.2055. IT | | APPEARS THAT THE PLANS HAVE BEEN SIGNED WITH INITALS. | | IF IT IS INDEED THE LEGAL SIGNATURE OF THE ARCHITECT | | THEN A SIGNED, SEALED, NOTORIZED LETTER INDICATING THE | | LEGAL SIGNATURE OF THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR | | OUR FILES. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT LETTER NOT SUBMITTED. | | | | | | 2. SHT A01.1 DEMO KEY NOTE #10 INDICATES CAPPING | | PLUMBING IN THE NEAREST DEMISING WALL. SECTION 704.5 | | PROHIBITS DEAD ENDS. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH | | SECTION AND SHOW THE LOCATION OF ALL DEMO'D PIPING. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE NOTE STILL INDICATES "CAP | | ALL PLUMBING LINES TO THE NEAREST WALL. IF PIPES ARE IN | | THE SLAB, CAP LEVEL WITH THE FLOOR SLAB". THIS DOES NOT | | MEET THE CODE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 704.5 PROHIBITING | | DEAD ENDS. ALL PLUMBING LINES SHALL BE DEMO'D BACK TO | | THE MAIN BRANCH LINE, OR IF THE BRANCH LINE IS NOT IN | | USE, THE PLUMBING LINE SHALL BE DEMO'D BACK TO THE | | BUILDING DRAIN. THERE IS NO REQUIREMENT FOR | | ACCESSIBILITY TO A DEMO'D PLUMBING LINE. | | | | 3. OK | | 4. OK | | 5. OK | | | | **********NEW COMMENT********** | | | | 1B. THE NOTICE TO BUILDING OFFICIAL USE OF PRIVATE | | PROVIDER INDICATES THE PRIVATE PROVIDER TO BE MORGAN | | DICKINSON, P.E., ADDRESS: 5808-D BRECKENRIDGE PARKWAY, | | TAMPA, FL 33610, BUT THE PRIVATE PROVIDER ON THE | | PRIVATE PROVIDER BUILDING PLANS COMPLIANCE AFFIDAVIT IS | | INDICATED ASVALDO AREVALO, P.E., ADDRESS: 1011 SHOTGUN | | ROAD, SUNRISE, FL 33326. PLEASE CLARIFY. FS 553.791. | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING | | THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-03-08 |
Time |
13:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-03-08 |
Time |
13:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-03-08 13:31:32 | AUDIT DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | 1. ALL ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS. THE PRINTED NAME OF THE | | PERSON SEALING THE PLANS IS REQUIRED. THE SIGNATURE OF | | THE PERSON SEALING THE DOCUMENTS IS REQUIRED. FAC | | 61G1-16.003, 61G1-16.004(5)(6) & FS 481.2055. IT | | APPEARS THAT THE PLANS HAVE BEEN SIGNED WITH INITALS. | | IF IT IS INDEED THE LEGAL SIGNATURE OF THE ARCHITECT | | THEN A SIGNED, SEALED, NOTORIZED LETTER INDICATING THE | | LEGAL SIGNATURE OF THE ARCHITECT SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR | | OUR FILES. | | | | 2. SHT A01.1 DEMO KEY NOTE #10 INDICATES CAPPING | | PLUMBING IN THE NEAREST DEMISING WALL. SECTION 704.5 | | PROHIBITS DEAD ENDS. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH | | SECTION AND SHOW THE LOCATION OF ALL DEMO'D PIPING. | | | | 3. SHT A13.1 DETAIL D ELEVATION D-4 SHOWS THE DISPENSER | | MINIMUM OF 15" ABOVE THE FLOOR. PER SECTION 11-4.16.6 | | THE MINIMUM IS 19" TO THE DISPENSER. PLEASE SHOW | | COMPLIANCE. | | | | 4. ALL PLUMBING SHEETS. THE PRINTED NAME OF THE | | ENGINEER AND THE ENGINEER'S LICENSE NUMBER SHALL BE | | LEGIBLY INDICATED ON EACH SHEET. FAC 61G15-23.002(2). | | ALSO THE SIGNATURE OF THE ENGINEER IS REQUIRED ON ALL | | SHEETS. IT APPEARS THAT INITALS HAVE BEEN USED TO SIGN | | THE PLANS. IF THIS IS INDEED THE LEGAL SIGNATURE OF THE | | ENGINEER, THEN A SIGNED, SEALED, NOTORIZED LETTER | | INDICATING THE LEGAL SIGNATURE OF THE ENGINEER SHALL BE | | SUBMITTED FOR OUR FILES. | | | | 5. SHT P02.2 DOMESTIC WATER PIPING ISOMETRIC RISER | | DIAGRAM SHOWS WATER HAMMER ARRESTORS AT THE TOP OF THE | | DROPS, IN THE CEILING. PER PDI-WH 201 THE WATER HAMMER | | ARRESTORS, IF INSTALLED, SHALL BE LOCATED NEAR THE | | FIXTURES, IN AN "EFFECTIVE RANGE", NOT IN THE CEILING | | AS SHOWN. PLEASE SHOW THE WATER HAMMER ARRESTORS NEAR | | THE FIXTURES. | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING | | THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-12-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-12-03 |
Time |
17:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-12-03 |
Time |
17:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-12-03 17:40:52 | PASSED (RESTAMP) | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL SIGNAGE, TO INCLUDE THOSE ON THE | | CONSTRUCTION BARRIER, REQUIRES A SEPARATE SIGN PERMIT. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-04-25 |
Time |
08:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-04-25 |
Time |
08:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-25 08:58:42 | PASSED (RESTAMP) | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL SIGNAGE, TO INCLUDE THOSE ON THE | | CONSTRUCTION BARRIER, REQUIRES A SEPARATE SIGN PERMIT. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-03-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-03-13 |
Time |
10:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-03-13 |
Time |
10:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-03-13 10:18:37 | PASSED | | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL SIGNAGE, TO INCLUDE THOSE ON THE | | CONSTRUCTION BARRIER, REQUIRES A SEPARATE SIGN PERMIT. |
|
|