Plan Review Details - Permit 07110731
Plan Review Stops For Permit 07110731
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 8 Status P Date 2009-09-29 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2009-09-29 Time 15:39 Rev Time 0.44
Received By jwitmer Date 2009-09-29 Time 15:39 Sent To  
Notes
2009-09-29 15:40:31REVISION# 11 8-25-0911-1.1/ A1-1.2

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 7 Status P Date 2009-09-22 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2009-09-22 Time 13:51 Rev Time 0.60
Received By jwitmer Date 2009-09-22 Time 13:19 Sent To  
Notes
2009-09-22 13:51:21900 BRANDYWINE RD
 UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
  
 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 PERMIT: 07110731
 ADD: 900 BRANDYWINE RD
 CONT: HEDRICK BROTHERS
 TEL: (561)281-7530
  
 FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS
 * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS
  
 REVISION REVIEW
 ACTION: REVIEWED
  
 SHEETS A-1.1 & A-1.1.2

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 6 Status F Date 2009-07-01 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2009-07-01 Time 11:09 Rev Time 0.50
Received By jwitmer Date 2009-07-01 Time 11:09 Sent To  
Notes
2009-07-01 11:10:06BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 PERMIT: 07110731
 ADD: 900 BRANDYWINE RD
 CONT: HEDRICK BROTHERS
 TEL: (561)281-7530
  
 FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS
 * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS
  
 REVISION REVIEW A-6.1.4
 ACTION: DENIED
  
 A-6.1.4 PLANS INDICATE THE USE OF EFIS TRIM ABOVE
 40'-0" PLEASE SEE 1406.2.2. ARCHITECTURAL TRIM THAT
 EXCEEDS 40 FEET (12 192 MM) IN HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE PLANE
 SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF APPROVED NONCOMBUSTIBLE
 MATERIALS AND SHALL BE SECURED TO THE WALL WITH METAL
 OR OTHER APPROVED NONCOMBUSTIBLE BRACKETS.
 JIM WITMER C. B. O.
 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II
  
 TEL: (561)805-6715
 FAX: (561)805-6731
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
 SURVEY:
 WWW.SURVEYMONKEY.COM/WESTPALMBEACHCONSTRUCTIONSERVICES
  
 PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS
 LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS
 REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO
 THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE
 THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE.

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2009-07-01 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2009-07-01 Time 11:27 Rev Time 5.55
Received By jwitmer Date 2009-06-30 Time 9:40 Sent To  
Notes
2009-07-01 11:28:44REVISIONS ACCEPTED DATED:
 3-20-09 AARCHITECTRURAL WITH EXCEPTION TO A-6.1.4
 4-16-09 STRUCTURAL

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2008-12-09 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2008-12-09 Time 07:42 Rev Time 2.22
Received By jwitmer Date 2008-12-09 Time 07:42 Sent To  
Notes
2008-12-09 11:49:48BUILDING PROVISO: FOR ROOF PERMIT A LAYOUT SHEET
 SHOWING STEPPED INSULATION WITH R-VALUES MATCHING THE
 ENERGY CALCULATIONS
 1056 MTL BLDG ROOF/ R-19 BATT RVALUE 20.3
  
 ROOF TILE SANTAFE TILE CORP MISSION BARREL ROOF TILE
 NOA 07-0626.04
 POLYFOAM - POLYPRO AH160 NOA 06-0201.02 REPLACES
 EXPIRED 01-0521.02
 INFORMAL INTERPRETATION# 5438 MINIMUM R-VALUES AT ROOF
 DRAIN
 JOHN MANVILLE MODIFIED BIT OVER STEEL DECK NOA
 07-0228.04
 SYSTEM TYPE: B(2) PAGES 9&10
 ON TARGET ENHANCED FASTENING REPORT
 END OF ROOF SUBMITTALS 12-09-08 J. WITMER
  

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2008-11-13 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2008-11-13 Time 07:41 Rev Time 0.77
Received By jwitmer Date 2008-11-13 Time 15:56 Sent To  
Notes
2008-11-13 16:12:56900 BRANDYWINE RD
 UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
 NOV.13,2008
  
  
  
  
  
 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 PERMIT: 07110731
 ADD: 900 BRANDYWINE RD
 CONT: HEDRICK BROTHERS
 TEL: (561)281-7530
  
 FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS
 * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS
  
 3RD REVIEW
 ACTION:
  
 ENERGY CALCULATIONS:
  
 1) IN THE INPUT DATA REPORT, FLOORS, HAVE TAKEN A VALUE
 OF 5.73 FOR THE TOTAL AREA OF THE BUILDING. FOR
 CONCRETE FLOOR, IN ELECTRIC ROOMS, MECHANICAL, JANITORS
 COLOSETS. THE SAME VALUE FOR CARPET AND PADDING ALSO
 WAS TAKEN FOR CERAMIC TILE FLOORS, THE ENERGY CODE
 APPENDIX-B 2.5.2 FOR MASS FLOORS. PLEASE REVIEW U-
 FACTORS IF THE INSULATION IS NOT CONTINUOUS.
  
 THIS ITEM PLUS THE MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENT RELATED TO
 THE ENRGY CODE WILL HAVE AN EFFECT ON THE OUTCOME OF
 THE BUILDING END USE SCORE OF 99.44.
  
 BOTH THE MECHANICAL AND BUILDING REVIEWERS WILL ACCEPT
 NEW ENERGY CALCULATION FOR THIS REVIEW.
 JIM WITMER C. B. O.
 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II
  
 TEL: (561)805-6715
 FAX: (561)805-6731
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS
 LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS
 REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO
 THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE
 THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE.

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2008-06-05 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2008-06-05 Time 07:32 Rev Time 5.55
Received By jwitmer Date 2008-06-04 Time 13:24 Sent To  
Notes
2008-06-05 07:34:39900 BRANDYWINE RD
 UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
 DEC.28, 2007
  
  
  
  
  
 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 PERMIT: 07110731
 ADD: 900 BRANDYWINE RD
 CONT: HEDRICK BROTHERS
 TEL: (561)281-7530
  
 FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS
 * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS
  
 2ND REVIEW
 ACTION: DENIED
  
 1-8 COMPLIED
  
 9) 2ND REQUEST, PLEASE SEE A-2.1.1 & A2.1.3 BOTH PLANS
 INDICATE THE USE OF RAMPS 3/4" /12". SEE DEFINITION OF
 RAMP 11-3 A WALKING SURFACE WHICH HAS A RUNNING SLOPE
 GREATER THAN 1:20. SEE 11-4.8.5 WHERE HANDRAILS WILL BE
 REQUIRED, HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS GRATER THAN 72". THE
 RESPONCE INDICATED THAT THE CITY IS IN RECEIPT OF A
 LETTER THAT WAS WRITTEN BY THE BOARD OF THE UNITED
 METHODIST OF THE PALM BEACHES, IN A MEETING BETWEEN
 ARCHITECT PAUL TWITTY AND ROBERT BROWN THIS WAS AGREED
 UPON BUT TO THIS DATE THIS REQUIREMENT HAS NOT BEEN
 MET.
  
 10) 2ND REQUEST, A-211 & A-2.1.3 BOTH INDICATE THE USE
 OF AN ELECTRIC LIFT, PLEASE PROVIDE CODE COMPLIANCE
 INFORMATION ON THE LIFT, 11-4.1.3 EXCEPTION# 4. THE
 MANUFACTURERS MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1
 AS OF 11-4.11.
  
 11-15) COMPLIED.
  
 16) 2ND REQUEST, ROOF HATCHES TO DATE THERE IS ONLY ONE
 ROOF HATCH THAT HAS SAUGHT AN APPROVAL WITHIN THE CITY
 A COPY OF THAT APPROVAL WAS PROVIDED TO YOUR OFFICE
 EARLIER. THIS IS A REQUIREMENT THAT WILL NEED TO BE MET
 BEFORE ISSUANCE OF THE PLAN. RULE 9B-72.
  
 17-23) COMPLIED.
  
 24) SEMI-COMPLIED, 3-HOUR FUSIBLE LINK DOOR APPROVALS
 FOR FIRE RATING HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO THIS OFFICE,
 DOOR D-173 IS OPEN TO AN EXTERIOR CORRIDOR WHICH WILL
 ALSO BE EXPOSED TO WIND AND WILL NEED A TEST REPORT
 ALSO FOR WIND PRESSURES. SINCE THERE IS NO GLAZING IN
 THIS DOOR IT WILL ONLY NEED TO BE TESTED FOR WIND
 RESISTANCE AND NEED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 1714.5.3.1.
  
 25) SEMI COMPLIED IMPACT RATED GLASS AND FRAMES A-7.3.3
 THE DALLE DE VERRE GLASS ALUMINUM WINDOWS PLEASE
 CLARIFY IF THE DALLE DE VERRE IS THE MANUFACTURER OF
 THE WHOLE WINDOW UNIT INCLUSIVE OF WINDOW FRAME OR IF
 THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR A STAIN GLASS INSET PANEL
 WHICH WILL BE SANDWICHED WITHIN A WINDOW AND FRAME UNIT
 THAT HAS BEEN TESTED FOR LARGE MISSILE IMPACT TESTING
 AND RECEIVED A ACCEPTANCE REPORT. ON BOTH THE FLORIDA
 WEBSITE AND THE MIAMI-DADE WEBSITE DALLE DE VERRE GLASS
 DOE NOT INDICATE THAT ANY OF THEIR PRODUCTS HAVE BEEN
 TESTED TO COMPLY WITH 1609.1.4.
  
 26 ) 2ND REQUEST, FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS &
 CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES,
 3 IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR OF PRODUCT TESTING
 REPORTS, MISSING REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
  
 A) GLAZED OPENINGS, FIXED
 YKKAP YHS 50 TU NOA 05-0317.03 IS MISSING THE FLORIDA
 APPROVAL, THERE ARE (3) APRROVALS THIS WINDOW CAN FALL
 UNDER, 2ND NO SHOP DRAWING STAMP OF APPROVAL FROM THE
 DESIGN TEAMPLEASE
 AFFIX THIS STAMP TO THE FRONT OF THE DOCUMENT, PLACED
 ON THE BACK DOES NOT TIE IT TO THE DOCUMENT WHEN
 STAMPED.SHEETS 3-5 THE TOP OF THE COLUMN HEADINGS ARE
 CUT OFF AND NO IDENTIFICATION OF
 THESE HEADINGS ARE NOT KNOWN.
  
 SHEET A-7.3.1 WINDOW TYPE J A SEMI CIRCULAR WINDOW IS
 MISSING THERE APPROVA NO SUBMITTED.
  
 YKK YHC-300 O/G CURTAIN WALL NOA 06-0306.02 IS MISSING
 THE FLORIDA APPROVAL, AND NO SHOP DRAWING STAMP OF
 APPROVAL FROM THE DESIGN TEAM, PLEASE AFFIX ON THE
 FRONT OF THE DOCUMENT.
 PLEASE IDENTIFY GLASS TYPE TO BE USED , THIS WILL
 EFFECT PRESSURE RATINGS OF GLASS.
  
 B) GLAZED OPENINGS, OPERABLE YKK YOW 225H NON-THERMAL
 ALUMINUM CASEMENT WINDOWSPLEASE NOTE THE WINDOW
 LIMITATION IN HEIGTH OF 62'" NOT THE 75.5" AS INDICATED
 ON THE PLANS. PLEASE APPLY THE DESIGN TEAMS APPROVAL ON
 THE FRONT OF THE DOCUMENT NOT THE BACK AS ON THIS
 DOCUMENTSHOWING APPROVAL.
  
 C) MULLIONS- MAY OR MAYNOT BE INCLUDED IN THE WINDOW
 PRODUCT APPROVAL WITH THE CASEMENT WINDOWS BEING A
 ISSUE THIS MAY STILL BE A CONCERN. SHEET A-7.3.1 DETAIL
 B2 INDICATES THE USE OF 2 MULLIONS FOR DOUBLE UNITS.
  
 D) EXTERIOR GLAZED DOORS
 YKK 35H SERIES ALUMINUM OUTSWING ENTRANCE DOOR, MISSING
 THE FLORIDA COVER SHEET,
  
 E) EXTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS
 DOORS 127 & 128 ARE EXTERIOR DOORS TO RESTROOMS A-7.2.1
 DOOR SCHEDULE INDICATES THESE DOORS ARE HOLLOW METAL
 DOORS BUT THE DOOR TYPE# 2 INDICATES THESE ARE WOOD
 INTERIOR DOORS.
 PAIR OF DOORS A147 EXTERIOR METAL DOORS WITH LOUVER
 PAIR OF DOORS A108 EXTERIR HOLLOW METAL DOORS
 NO PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED FOR HOLLOW METAL
 DOORS
  
 NEW DOOR HEADING:
 EXTERIOR WOOD DOOR
 EXTERIOR WOOD DOORS WITH GLAZING
 IN BOTH CASES OF THE EXTERIOR WOOD DOORS SITE SPECIFIC
 REPORT WILL NEED TO BE SUPPLIED SEE ATTACHEMENT FOR
 LOCAL AND SITE SPECIFIC PRODUCT APPROVAL REPORTS
 MEERTING THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 RULE 9B-72.040PRODUCT EVALUATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
 FOR LOCAL APPROVAL.
 METHOD 2 (B) AN EVALUATION REPORT FROM A FLORIDA
 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER DEVELOPED AND SIGNED AND SEALED,
 BASED UPON TESTING, OR COMPARARATIVE OR RATIONAL
 ANALYSIS, OR COMBINATION THEREOF WHICH PROVIDES
 VERIFIBLE DOCUMENTATIONINDICATING THE PRODUCT WAS
 EVALUATED TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE AND THAT
 THE PRODUCT IS, FOR THE PURPOSE INTENDED, AT LEAST
 EQUIVALENT TO THAT REQUIRED BY THE CODE.
 NOTE: THE CUSTOM WOOD ENTRY DOORS WITH GLAZED OPENINGS
 WILL NOT NEED TO MEET LARGE MISSILE IMPACT RESISTANCE
 AS PER THE BUILDING OFFICIALS INTERPRETATION PHAMPHLET
 QUESTION# 15.
  
 F) EXTERIOR ROLL UP DOORS- COVERED UNDER COMMENT# 24
 REQUIRES PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR WIND
  
 G) ROOF ACCESS HATCHES- NO APPROVAL SUBMITTED
  
 H) PANEL WALL SYSTEMS : LOUVERS NO APPROVALS SUBMITTED
  
 I) PANEL WALL SYSTEMS: EFIS WALL SYSTEMS - REMOVED FROM
 PROJECT NOT REQUIRED
  
 J) ROOFING SYSTEMS BOTH FOR FLAT ROOF AND TILED SLOPED
 SYSTEMS
  
 JOHN MANSVILLE MODIFIED NOA 07-0228.04 NO FLORIDA
 APPROVAL SUBMITTED. PAGES 7-41 OF THE PRODUCT APPROVAL
 THAT WAS SUBMITTED ARE SUB-SYSTEMS, EACH OF THESE
 SUB-SYSTEMS HAVE ASSOCIATED
 WIND PRESSURES THAT MAY OR MAY NO REQUIRE ENHANCED
 FASTENING. PLEASE CIRCLE THE SUB-SYSTEM TO BE
 INSTALLED, NOTE THE ASSOCIATED PRESSURES WITH THAT
 SUB-SYSTEM IF THE PRESSURES ARE LESS THAN 89PSF FOR
 ZONES 2 AND 3 , ENHANCED FASTENING WILL BE REQUIRED.
 PLEASE LOOK AT THE HIGH LIGHTED SUB-SYSTEM PICKED TO
 SEE IF LIMITATION 7 OR 9 EXIST. LIMITATION# 7 WILL
 ALLOW ENHANCED FASTENING IN ZONES 2& 3 LIMITATION# 9
 WILL NOT ALLOW ENHANCEDFASTENING. THIS REPORT DOES
 REQUIRE A DESIGN PROFESSIONAL TO COMPLETE THE RAS 117
 CALCULATION FOR ENHANCED FASTENING.
  
 POLYFOAM - NO PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED NOR
 FLORIDA COVER SHEET. THEERE ARE 4 SEPERATE FLORIDA
 APPROVALS ON THE WEBSITE. RULE 9B-72. NOT KNOWN AS TO
 WHAT PATTY SIZE WIL BE USED WITH ASSOCIATED PRESSURES.
  
 SANTAFE TILE , NO FLORIDA APPROVLA WAS SUBMITTED
  
 CENTRIA- RIB METAL WALL PANEL -NO FL APPROVAL
 SUBMITTED
  
 CLAYLITE- NO PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED, CLAY TILE
 VENTURES DOES HAVE A FL COVERSHEET.
  
 27) PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT APPLICATION
 AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE
 FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION PLEASE
 SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG.
 PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE
 SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT
 IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT
 HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR
 LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE
 9B-72. SEE ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG
  
 28-31) PART OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALSSEMI COMPLIED.
  
 32) NEW COMMENT:
 SHEET A-7.2.1/ DOOR SCHEDULE:
 DOOR# 113B& C REVISION INDICATES THESE DOORS ARE TO BE
 A FIRE RATED 45 MINUTE DOOR, IF THESE DOORS ARE TO BE
 CUSTOM MADE WHO WILL PROVIDE THE FIRE RATING FOR THESE
 DOORS?
 715.3 HSA TEST REQUIREMENTS PLUS THE DOOR ALSO HAS
 GLAZED OPENINGS THAT WILL NEED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS
 OF 715.4 FIRE-PROTECTION RATED GLAZING.
  
 DOOR 114A IS INDICATED AS A 90 MINUTE DOOR, TYPE 12 A
 SINGLE DOOR WITH LITE SEE TABLE 715.4 AND 715.4.3
  
 DOOR 126A & C BOTH ARE INDICATED AS A DOOR TYPE 9 A
 HOLLOW METAL DOOR BUT THE DEPICTION INDICATES THIS DOOR
 TO BE A WOOD ENTRY DOOR WITH WOOD PANELS, 90 MINUTE
 DOOR?
  
 DOOR 135A & 140A BOTH INDICATE THE DOOR TYPE TO BE A 12
 SINGLE DOOR WITH LITE, SEE TABLE 715.4 AND 715.4.3
  
 DOOR 145B IS LISTED AS A DOOR TYPE 2 HOLLOW METAL 90
 MINUTE DOOR BUT DEPICTED AS A WOOD DOOR.
  
 .DOOR 143A&C BOTH ARE INDICATED AS A DOOR TYPE 9 A
 HOLLOW METAL DOOR BUT THE DEPICTION INDICATES THIS DOOR
 TO BE A WOOD ENTRY DOOR WITH WOOD PANELS, 90 MINUTE
 DOOR?
  
 33) BEFORE A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT, MAY BE ISSUED, IMPACT
 FEES MUST BE PAID TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. THE ACTUAL
 PERMIT SET OF PLANS MUST BE STAMPED BY THAT OFFICE, AND
 A COPY OF THE PAID RECEIPT ATTACHED TO THE PERMIT
 APPLICATION. PLEASE CALL (561)233-5025 FOR MORE
 INFORMATION.
  
 JIM WITMER C. B. O.
 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II
  
 TEL: (561)805-6715
 FAX: (561)659-8026
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS
 LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS
 REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO
 THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE
 THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT APPLICATION
 AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE
 FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION PLEASE
 SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG.
 PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE
 SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT
 IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT
 HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR
 LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE
 9B-72. SEE ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG

Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2007-12-26 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2007-12-26 Time 14:25 Rev Time 9.99
Received By jwitmer Date 2007-12-26 Time 14:25 Sent To  
Notes
2007-12-26 16:52:48900 BRANDYWINE RD
 UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
 DEC.28, 2007
  
  
  
  
  
 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 PERMIT: 07110731
 ADD: 900 BRANDYWINE RD
 CONT: HEDRICK BROTHERS
 TEL: (561)281-7530
  
 FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS
 * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS
  
 1ST REVIEW
 ACTION: DENIED
  
 1A) --- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT ---
 PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE!
 WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION &
 REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL
 LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH
 A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE
 SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE
 FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR
 YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 1B)PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, PLANS, REPORTS,
 REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR SUBMITTALS FOR
 REVIEW FOR PERMIT. IF YOUR PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A
 RESIDENT INSPECTOR OR IF YOUR PROJECT IS A THRESHOLD
 BUILDING REQUIRING A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN (3) THREE
 SETS OF ALL SAID DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PERMIT
 ISSUANCE. 106.1* /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS WEST PALM
 BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.
  
 1C) 106.1.1* W.P.B. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE/2004 DRAWINGS &
 SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN THE FORM
 OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS,
 WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY WITH THE
 TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE SPECIFIC TO
 THE TECHNICAL CODES "SHALL NOT BE CITED AS A WHOLE OR
 IN PART, NOR THE TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS EQUIVALENT BE USED
 AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC INFORMATION". CONSTRUCTION
 DOCUMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE
 LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND
 SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS
 OF THIS CODE AND RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND
 REGULATIONS, AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL.
  
 1D ) FL S S 713.13 NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED
 WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT. NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE
 WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS NOT
 ACTUALLY COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING
 THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6)
 THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE
 CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION.
  
 1E) PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT (FIRST TIME REVIEW)
 AFTER JULY 1ST, 2007 SHALL BE REVIEWED TO THE 2004 FBC
 BUILDING WITH THE 2007 REVISIONS PLEASE REVISE YOUR
 CODE SUMMARY FOUND ON SHEET A-0.1.1.
  
 2( SHEET A-0.1.1:
 2A) THE PLANS APPEAR TO HAVE CODE TERMINOLOGY THAT IS
 FOUND UNDER THE 2001 FBC THE BUILDING, (NEW) IS LABEL
 BUILDING TYPE II SPRINKLED AND A-1 ASSEMBLY LARGE.
 PLEASE SEE TABLE 503 FOR THE ALLOWABLE HEIGHT AND AREAS
 FOR A A-3 OCCUPANCY (CHURCH) FOR AND DECLARE THE
 MINIMUM BUILDING TYPE. 602.1.1 FOUND IN THE 2004 FBC.
 IF AREA INCREASES ARE TO BE TAKEN PLEASE INDICATE THE
 CALCULATIONS WHERE THESE INCREASES WERE TAKEN. PLEASE
 SEE UNLIMITED AREA UNDER 507.5 IS FOR A SINGLE STORY
 BUILDING, SHEET A-2.2.1 INDICATES A SECOND STORY
 LOCATED WITHIN THE BUILDING.
  
 2B) CODE SUMMARY STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS, THE HOUR RATINGS
 AND FOOTNOTES FOUND IN THIS SECTION ARE ALSO TAKEN FROM
 THE 2001 FBC, PLEASE REVIEW AND UPDATE TO THE 2004 FBC
 SEE TABLE 601, TABLE 602 & TABLE 704.8.
  
 2C) BUILDING INFORMATION MAKES IT UNCLEAR AS TO WHAT
 BUILDING TYPE IS BEING INDICATED, THERE IS A EXISTING
 BUILDING AND A NEW BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED,
 THEN A TOTAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT. IF THIS TO BE TWO
 SEPARATE BUILDINGS WITH A PROPOSED FIREWALL LEAVE OFF
 THE TOTAL BUILDING FIGURE, THEY WOULD BE CONSIDERED TWO
 SEPARATE BUILDINGS. IF DESIGNING TO THE MORE CRITICAL
 TYPE I-B FOR THE TOTAL BUILDING THE AREA IS UNLIMITED.
 106.1.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS REQUIRED.
  
 3) SHEET A-2.1.3: DISCREPANCY, PLEASE SEE DOOR NUMBER
 A126 & C126 THE TWO DOORS HAVE A COMBINED OCCUPANT LOAD
 OF 194 ALSO LOOK AT THE EGRESS PATH TO DOOR 126B AND
 THE OCCUPANT LOAD REFLECTED ON THE PLAN IS ONLY159 THIS
 IS LOWER THAN THE 194 REGRESSING THROUGH THE 2 PAIR OF
 DOUBLE DOORS PLUS AN ADDITIONAL 5 FROM THE EXIT ACCESS
 CORRIDOR HEADING TOWARDS THIS EXIT DOORWAY. THIS IS
 CREATING A CONVERGING EXIT AT A DOORWAY THAT CAN ONLY
 HANDLE 170 THROUGH THE DOOR. 1004.5 CONVERGING EXITS.
  
 4A) SHEET A-2.1.3 & A2.1.1, THE CONTINUATION OF THE
 EGRESS PATH FROM DOOR 126B LEADS TO A EXTERIOR SIDEWALK
 INTO WHAT APPEARS TO BE A EGRESS COURT AND THROUGH THE
 COVERED WALKWAY OF THE EXISTING BUILDING. 705.1 FIRE
 WALLS SERVING TO CREATE SEPARATE BUILDINGS, THEREFORE
 ALL PROVISIONS OF THE CODE INCLUDING HEIGHT AND AREA
 LIMITATIONS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS AND MEANS OF
 EGRESS ARE TO BE APPLIED INDIVIDUALLY TO EACH BUILDING.
 IF THE COVERED WALKWAY FROM THE EXISTING BUILDING IS TO
 BE CONSIDERED PART OF THE EGRESS PATH FROM THE COURT
 AREA SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL BE REQUIRED. 4B)
 THE PLANS INDICATE THE EXISTING BUILDING TO BE A TYPE V
 BUILDING, IS THIS A 2001 OR 2004 TYPE V? 4C) PLANS
 INDICATE THIS EXTERIOR WALL NOT HAVING ANY WINDOWS
 WITHIN THE COVERED WALKWAY WHICH WOULD CREATE A FIRE
 HAZARD REQUIRING FIRE RATED OPENING PROTECTIVE? 4D) THE
 OTHER ISSUE IS THE PLAN ALSO INDICATE THE EXISTING WALL
 TO HAVE A WALL IDENTIFICATION TAG AS A 710, A 2HR RATED
 WALL WITH CORE FILL 500, IS THIS WALL ALREADY
 CONSTRUCTED THIS WAY?
  
 1023.5.2 CONSTRUCTION AND OPENINGS OF EGRESS COURTS
 WHERE AN EGRESS COURT SERVING A BUILDING OR PORTION
 THEREOF IS LESS THAN 10 FEET (3048 MM) IN WIDTH, THE
 EGRESS COURT WALLS SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 1-HOUR
 FIRE-RESISTANCE-RATED EXTERIOR WALLS COMPLYING WITH
 SECTION 704 FOR A DISTANCE OF 10 FEET (3048 MM) ABOVE
 THE FLOOR OF THE COURT , AND OPENINGS THEREIN SHALL BE
 EQUIPPED WITH FIXED OR SELF-CLOSING, ?-HOUR OPENING
 PROTECTIVE ASSEMBLIES.
  
 4E) NOTE THE NEW FLAT DECKS CREATED ON THE EXISTING
 BUILDING WILL CREATE ADDITIONAL ROOF CONTRIBUTIONS SEE
 A-5.1.2 & A5.1.6 SEE PLUMBING COMMENTS FOR ADDITIONAL
 INFORMATION FOR ROOF DRAINAGE.
  
 4F) THE EXISTING TWO STORY CHAPEL, IS THERE OPENINGS
 ABOVE THE SLOPED ROOF SECTIONS , THE NEW HORIZONTAL
 ROOF DECKS? 705.6.1.
  
 5) SHEET A-2.1.3 DISCREPANCY, PLEASE SEE CHOIR
 REHEARSAL ROOM 153 AND SHEET A-2.1.1 ON THIS SHEET
 CORRIDORS 152 & 157 ARE BLOCKED BY A WALL NOT SHOWN ON
 SHEET A-2.1.3. 106.1.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
 REQUIRED.
  
 6) PLEASE PROVIDE CODE COMPLIANCE WITH TABLE 1016.1FOR
 ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES GREATER THAN 30 THE CORRIDORS ARE
 TO BE FIRE RATED 1 HR EVEN WITH FIRE SPRINKLERS.
 CORRIDORS, 111, 118 & 120 DO NOT INDICATE RATED WALLS
 AND OPENING PROTECTIVE ON DOOR AND WINDOW OPENINGS
 TABLE 715.3. PLEASE PROVIDE CODE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS
 SITUATION.
  
 7) PLEASE SEE M-2.1.0 WHERE MECHANICAL DUCTS CROSS
 RATED WALLS WITHOUT THE INSTALLATION OF RATED DAMPERS,
 712.3.3 DUCTS AND AIR TRANSFER OPENINGS.
  
 8) PLEASE PROVIDE ON LIFE SAFETY SHEET A-2.1.3 WHICH
 DESIGN METHOD WAS USED 1024.6.1 WITHOUT SMOKE
 PROTECTION OR 1024.6.2 SMOKE PROTECTED SEATING.
  
 9) PLEASE SEE A-2.1.1 & A2.1.3 BOTH PLANS INDICATE THE
 USE OF RAMPS 3/4" /12". SEE DEFINITION OF RAMP 11-3 A
 WALKING SURFACE WHICH HAS A RUNNING SLOPE GREATER THAN
 1:20. SEE 11-4.8.5 WHERE HANDRAILS WILL BE REQUIRED,
 HORIZONTAL PROJECTIONS GRATER THAN 72".
  
 10) A-2.1.1 & A2.1.3 BOTH PLANS INDICATE THE USE OF AN
 ELECTRIC LIFT, PLEASE PROVIDE CODE COMPLIANCE
 INFORMATION ON LIFT11-4.1.3, EXCEPTION# 4.
  
 11) A-2.1.1 & A-2.1.3 BOTH STAIRS BY DOORS A126 & A143
 BOTH HAVE F.E.C. THIS ABBREVIATION IS NOT LISTED ON
 A-0.1.1 ARCHITECTURAL ABBREVIATIONS, 106.1.2 ADDITIONAL
 INFORMATION REQUIRED.
  
 12) SHEET A-2.1.1& A-2.1.3 BOTH INDICATE CLASSROOM 1
 ROOM# 1 AND DOOR# B172, THIS DOOR IS MISSING THE CLEAR
 FLOOR SPACE (18") LATCH SIDE OF THE DOOR. 11-4.13.5
 DOORWAY MIN CLEAR WIDTH . DOORWAYS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM
 CLEAR WIDTH OF 32" WITH THE DOOR OPEN 90-DEGREES,
 MEASURED BETWEEN THE FACE OF THE DOOR AND OPPOSITE
 STOP.
 11-4.13.6 MANEUVERING CLEARENCES AT DOORS. MINIMUM
 MANEUVERING CLEARANCES AT DOORS THAT ARE NOT AUTOMATIC
 OR POWER-ASSISTED SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN
 FIG. 25. THE FLOOR OR GROUND AREA WITHIN THE REQUIRED
 CLEARANCES SHALL BE CLEAR & LEVEL.
  
 13) SHEET A-2.1.1 & A2.1.3 DISCREPANCY SHEET A-2.1.1 IS
 MISSING OPENINGS INTO THE RESTROOMS 150 & 159 FROM THE
 VESTIBULES, 106.1.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED.
  
 14) SHEET A-2.11 & A-2.1.3 THERE APPEARS TO BE A
 DISCREPANCY IN THE RAMP AT THE ENTRY POINT 146,
 A-12.1.1 INDICATES A DIFFERENCE OF 5" BUT THE RAMP IS
 NOT CLEARLY MARKED WHEREAS ON A-2.1.3 THE RAMP SHOWS
 EXPANSION JOINTS SPREAD AT 14'-0" APART? 11.4.8.5.
 HANDRAILS: IF A RAMP HAS A RISE GREATER THAN 6" OR A
 HORIZONTAL PROJECTION GREATER THAN 72", THEN IT SHALL
 HAVE HANDRAILS ON BOTH SIDES.
  
 15) SHEET A-2.1.3 & A-2.2.3 THERE SEEMS TO BE A
 DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE 1 HR FIRE RATING AND THE 2HR
 FIRE RATING? 106.1.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED.
  
 16) A-2.2.1 THIS SHEET INDICATES (3) AREAS WHERE ACCESS
 TO THE ROOF WILL BE THROUGH A ROOF HATCH. PLEASE NOTE,
 TO DATE THERE IS NO PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT COMPLY WITH
 THE FLORIDA STATE STATUTE RULE 9B-72
 REQUIRING PRODUCT TESTING AND A THIRD PARTY QUALITY
 ASSURANCE PROGRAM. THIS ITEM WILL BE A PROVISO AND IF
 BY THE TIME A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS ASKED FOR THE
 MANUFACTURER OF THE ROOF HATCH WILL NEED TO HAVE
 RECEIVED EITHER A STATEWIDE APPROVAL, A ISSUED
 MIAMI-DADE NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE(NOA) OR RECEIVED A
 LOCAL APPROVAL FROM THIS JURISDICTION.
  
 17) M-2.2.0 THE BLOWER ROOM WHICH IS PART OF THE FIRE
 RATED ASSEMBLY INDICATES DUCT PENETRATION THROUGH THESE
 WALLS WITHOUT DAMPERS. 712.3.3 DUCTS AND AIR TRANSFER
 OPENINGS.
  
 18) A-2.2.3 SPIRAL STAIR, STAIR# 201 TO CONTROL ROOM
 PLEASE SEE 1009.9.1(6) THE TURN OF THE STAIRWAY SHALL
 BE SUCH THAT DESCENDING USERS HAVE THE OUTER HANDRAIL
 AT THEIR RIGHT SIDE. PLEASE INDICATE COMPLIANCE.
  
 19) A-3.1.1 PLANS INDICATE THE USE OF EFIS TRIM ABOVE
 40'-0" PLEASE SEE 1406.2.2. ARCHITECTURAL TRIM THAT
 EXCEEDS 40 FEET (12 192 MM) IN HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE PLANE
 SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF APPROVED NONCOMBUSTIBLE
 MATERIALS AND SHALL BE SECURED TO THE WALL WITH METAL
 OR OTHER APPROVED NONCOMBUSTIBLE BRACKETS. PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE ATTACHMENT DETAILS FOR THE EFIS OR EPS FOAM
 PRODUCTS WHERE THIS PRODUCT CAN BE USED BELOW 40'-" IN
 HEIGHT FROM GRADE.
  
 20) A-6.1.3 DETAIL# 7INDICATES THE USE OF A HIP AND
 RIDGE BOARD BUT NO METHOD OF ATTACHMENT HAS BEEN
 INDICATED PLEASE SEE:
 1507.3.7 ATTACHMENT. CLAY AND CONCRETE ROOF TILES SHALL
 BE FASTENED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1609 OR IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH FRSA/TRI 07320 INSTALLATION MANUAL.
  
 1507.3.8 APPLICATION. TILE SHALL BE APPLIED ACCORDING
 TO THE MANUFACTURER?S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS OR
 RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE FRSA/TRI 07320.
  
 PLEASE INDICAT ON THE PLANS WHICH TYPE OF STEEL ANGLE
 PLACEMENT OF FASTENER AND SPACING OF BRACKET IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH FRSA/ TRI 07320.
  
 21) SHEET A-6.1.4 VARIOUS DETAILS INDICATE THE USE OF
 5/8 INCH CDX PLYWOOD ROOF DECKING, PLEASE SEE TABLE 601
 FOOTNOTE (C) (2) WHERE FIRE RETARDANT TREATED PLYWOOD
 CAN AND CAN'T BE USED IN THE ROOF
 ASSEMBLIES. IF FIRE TREATED PLYWOOD IS TO BE USED, ALSO
 PROVIDE THE TYPE OF FASTENER AND TYPE OF METAL THE
 FASTENER WILL BE MADE FROM.
  
 22) SHEET A-6.1.4 DETAIL "6" INDICATES THE USE OF UL
 SYSTEM P537, PLEASE REVIEW THIS SYSTEM VERSES WHAT IS
 SHOWN ON THE SHEET. THE PLANS AGAIN INDICATE THE 5/8 "
 CDX PLYWOOD ON THE ROOF DECK AS WELL AS BENEATH THE
 BOTTOM CORD OF THE TRUSS AS A BACKER BOARD. PLEASE
 REVIEW AND CORRECT. TABLE 601 FOOTNOTE (C)(2) AND
 SECTION 603.
  
 23) A-6.1.6 DETAIL OR ELEVATION 1 INDICATES THE USE OF
 GILFORD FABRIC SCRIM STRETCHED AND STAPLED TO THE BACK
 OF FACED WOOD, PLEASE PROVIDE THE FLAME SPREAD RATING
 OF THIS FABRIC.
  
 803.6.1 TEXTILE WALL COVERINGS.
 TEXTILE WALL COVERINGS SHALL HAVE A CLASS A FLAME
 SPREAD INDEX IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 84 AND BE
 PROTECTED BY AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERS INSTALLED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 903.3.1.1 OR 903.3.1.2 OR THE
 COVERING SHALL MEET THE CRITERIA OF SECTION 803.6.1.1
 OR 803.6.1.2 WHEN TESTED IN THE MANNER INTENDED FOR USE
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 265 USING THE PRODUCT MOUNTING
 SYSTEM, INCLUDING ADHESIVE.
  
 803.6.1.1 METHOD A TEST PROTOCOL.
 DURING THE METHOD A PROTOCOL, FLAME SHALL NOT SPREAD TO
 THE CEILING DURING THE 40 KW EXPOSURE. DURING THE 150
 KW EXPOSURE, THE TEXTILE WALL COVERING SHALL COMPLY
 WITH ALL OF THE FOLLOWING:
 1. FLAME SHALL NOT SPREAD TO THE OUTER EXTREMITY OF THE
 SAMPLE ON THE 8-FOOT BY 12-FOOT (203 MM BY 305 MM)
 WALL.
 2. THE SPECIMEN SHALL NOT BURN TO THE OUTER EXTREMITY
 OF THE 2-FOOT-WIDE (610 MM) SAMPLES MOUNTED IN THE
 CORNER OF THE ROOM.
 3. BURNING DROPLETS DEEMED CAPABLE OF IGNITING TEXTILE
 WALL COVERINGS OR THAT BURN FOR 30 SECONDS OR MORE
 SHALL NOT FORM.
 4. FLASHOVER, AS DEFINED IN NFPA 265, SHALL NOT OCCUR.
 5. THE MAXIMUM NET INSTANTANEOUS PEAK HEAT RELEASE
 RATE, DETERMINED BY SUBTRACTING THE BURNER OUTPUT FROM
 THE MAXIMUM HEAT RELEASE RATE, DOES NOT EXCEED 300 KW.
  
  
 803.6.1.2 METHOD B TEST PROTOCOL.
 DURING THE METHOD B PROTOCOL, FLAMES SHALL NOT SPREAD
 TO THE CEILING AT ANY TIME DURING THE 40 KW EXPOSURE.
 DURING THE 150 KW EXPOSURE, THE TEXTILE WALL COVERING
 SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING:
 1. FLAME SHALL NOT SPREAD TO THE OUTER EXTREMITIES OF
 THE SAMPLES ON THE 8-FOOT BY 12-FOOT (203 MM BY 305 MM)
 WALLS.
 2. FLASHOVER, AS DESCRIBED IN NFPA 265, SHALL NOT
 OCCUR.
  
 24) A-7.2.3 DETAIL# 2 INDICATES THE USE OF A 3 HOUR
 FUSED LINK DROP FIRE DOOR. PLEASE PROVIDE THE
 MANUFACTURERS SPEC FOR THIS PRODUCT. 715.3/ 106.1.2.
  
  
 25) 1609.1.4 PROTECTION OF OPENINGS IN WIND-BORNE
 DEBRIS REGIONS, EXTERIOR GLAZING THAT RECEIVES POSITIVE
 PRESSURE IN THE LOWER 60 FEET (18.3 M) IN BUILDINGS
 SHALL BE ASSUMED TO BE OPENINGS AND THE BALANCE OF
 GLAZED OPENINGS IN THE REST OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE
 ASSUMED TO BE ZERO UNLESS SUCH GLAZING THAT RECEIVES
 POSITIVE PRESSURE IS IMPACT RESISTANT OR PROTECTED WITH
 AN IMPACT RESISTANT COVERING MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS
 OF SSTD 12, ASTM E 1886 AND ASTM E 1996, OR MIAMI-DADE
 TAS 201, 202 AND 203 REFERENCED THEREIN AS FOLLOWS: 1.
 GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED WITHIN 30 FEET (9.1 M) OF GRADE
 SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LARGE MISSILE TEST.
 2. GLAZED OPENINGS LOCATED MORE THAN 30 FEET (9.1 M)
 ABOVE GRADE SHALL MEET THE PROVISIONS OF THE SMALL
 MISSILE TEST.
  
 26) FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & CLADDING,
 PROVIDE 2 COPIES,
 3 IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR OF PRODUCT TESTING
 REPORTS, MISSING REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
 A) GLAZED OPENINGS, FIXED
 B) GLAZED OPENINGS, OPERABLE
 C) MULLIONS
 D) EXTERIOR GLAZED DOORS
 E) EXTERIOR HOLLOW METAL DOORS
 F) EXTERIOR ROLL UP DOORS
 G) ROOF ACCESS HATCHES
 H) PANEL WALL SYSTEMS : LOUVERS
 I) PANEL WALL SYSTEMS: EFIS WALL SYSTEMS ( NOT TRIM) J)
 ROOFING SYSTEMS BOTH FOR FLAT ROOF AND TILED SLOPED
 SYSTEMS
  
 27) PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT APPLICATION
 AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE
 FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION PLEASE
 SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG.
 PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE
 SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT
 IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT
 HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR
 LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE
 9B-72. SEE ATTACHMENT. WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG
  
 28) WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE
 PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE
 REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF
 RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL.
  
 29) 1714.5.5 MULLIONS OCCURRING BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL
 WINDOW AND GLASS DOOR ASSEMBLIES. 1714.5.5.1 MULLIONS.
 MULLIONS, OTHER THAN MULLIONS WHICH ARE AN INTEGRAL
 PART OF A WINDOW OR GLASS DOOR ASSEMBLY TESTED AND
 LABELED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 1714.5.2.1 , SHALL
 BE TESTED BY AN APPROVED TESTING LABORATORY OR BE
 ENGINEERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED ENGINEERING
 PRACTICE. BOTH METHODS SHALL USE PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
 CITED IN SECTIONS 1714.5.5.2 , 1714.5.5.3 AND
 1714.5.5.4 .
  
 30) 1714.5.5.2 LOAD TRANSFER. MULLIONS SHALL BE
 DESIGNED TO TRANSFER THE DESIGN PRESSURE LOADS APPLIED
 BY THE WINDOW AND DOOR ASSEMBLIES TO THE ROUGH OPENING
 SUBSTRATE.
  
 1714.5.5.4 STRUCTURAL SAFETY FACTOR.
 MULLIONS SHALL BE CAPABLE OF RESISTING A LOAD OF
 ONE-AND-ONE-HALF TIMES THE DESIGN PRESSURE LOADS
 APPLIED BY THE WINDOW AND DOOR ASSEMBLIES TO BE
 SUPPORTED WITHOUT EXCEEDING THE APPROPRIATE MATERIAL
 STRESS LEVELS. IF TESTED BY AN APPROVED LABORATORY, THE
 ONE AND ONE-HALF TIMES THE DESIGN PRESSURE LOAD SHALL
 BE SUSTAINED FOR 10 SECONDS, AND THE PERMANENT
 DEFORMATION SHALL NOT EXCEED 0.4 PERCENT OF THE MULLION
 SPAN AFTER THE ONE-AND-ONE-HALF TIMES DESIGN PRESSURE
 LOAD IS REMOVED.
  
 31) PLEASE REVIEW THE CRITERIA FOR FLAT ROOF PRODUCT
 APPROVAL SUBMITTALS,
 106.1.1.2 FOR ROOFING ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED BY THIS CODE,
 THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL ILLUSTRATE, DESCRIBE,
 AND DELINEATE THE TYPE OF ROOFING SYSTEMS, MATERIALS,
 FASTENING REQUIREMENTS, FLASHING REQUIREMENTS AND WIND
 RESISTANCE RATING THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED.
 FLAT ROOF:
 ____ CONTRACTOR DID NOT PROVIDE THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT.
  
 ___ CONTRACTOR DID NOT INDICATE THE ROOF PITCH.
  
 ___ CONTRACTOR FAILED TO INDICATE WHICH SUB-SYSTEM WILL
 BE INSTALLED.
  
 ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED HAS A LOW PRESSURE FOR ZONE
 _2&3__ .
  
 SINCE THE ROOFING REPORT DOESN?T HAVE THE SUBSYSTEM
 HIGHLIGHTED THE NEXT 2 ITEMS ARE HIGHLIGHTED.
  
 ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATES LIMITATION# 7, SHOULD
 THE FASTENER RESISTANCE BE LESS THAN THAT REQUIRED, AS
 DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL, A REVISED FASTENER
 SPACING, PREPARED , SIGNED AND SEALED BY A FLORIDA
 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED ARCHITECT
 OR REGISTERED ROOF CONSULTANT MAY BE SUBMITTED.
  
 ___ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED INDICATES LIMITATION# 9, NO
 ENHANCED FASTENING ALLOWED.
  
 102.1* WHERE, IN ANY SPECIFIC CASE, DIFFERENT SECTIONS
 OF THIS CODE SPECIFY DIFFERENT MATERIALS, METHODS OF
 CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS, THE MOST
 RESTRICTIVE SHALL GOVERN. WHERE THERE IS A CONFLICT
 BETWEEN A GENERAL REQUIREMENT AND A SPECIFIC
 REQUIREMENT, THE SPECIFIC
 REQUIREMENT SHALL BE APPLICABLE.
  
  
  
  
 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW
 JIM WITMER C. B. O.
 BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II
  
 TEL: (561)805-6715
 FAX: (561)659-8026
 E-MAIL: [email protected]
  
 PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS
 LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS
 REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO
 THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE
 THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE.

Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2009-07-07 Cont ID  
Sent By btrobaug Date 2009-07-07 Time 11:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By btrobaug Date 2009-07-07 Time 10:27 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2008-06-06 Cont ID  
Sent By btrobaug Date 2008-06-06 Time 13:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By btrobaug Date 2008-06-05 Time 16:37 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop E ELECTRICAL
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2007-12-22 Cont ID  
Sent By dpalmer Date 2007-12-22 Time 10:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dpalmer Date 2007-12-17 Time 17:10 Sent To  
Notes
2007-12-22 10:01:532007-12-22 10:01:53
  
 ** DENIEDREVIEW **
  
 ** PLEASE SEE THE COMMENTS BELOW AS THERE ARE MANY
 ITEMS WHICH ARE MISSING FROM MINIMUM CODE REQUIRED
 DESIGN.
 AS THERE ARE A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF ITEMS NOT SHOWN
 FOR WHICH A REVIEW CAN NOT BE DONE AT THIS TIME. THERE
 MAY BE NEW COMMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING REVIEW.
  
 1) NOTE:PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING RELEVANT CODES SHALL
 BE STATED ON PLANS FOR DESIGN. MANY OF THESE ARE SHOWN
 HOWEVER SOME SHOWN ARE NOT YET ADOPTED BY THE STATE.
 THESE ARE TO BE STATED ON BOTH ARCHITECTURAL AND
 ELECTRICAL. (SOME ARE DONE ALREADY)
 2004 FBC W/2007 REVISIONS.
 2005 NFPA-70
 2003 NFPA-101(SHOWS 2005) (FOR INFORMATION, THE NEXT
 LIFE SAFETY CODE WILL BE 2006 WHEN ADOPTED)
 2002 NFPA-72
 2003 NFPA-20 (NO YEAR SHOWN FP SHEETS)
  
 2) NOTE: NOTE REMOVED
  
 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SITE PLAN SHEET FP 2OF 5 AS THIS
 INDICATES A SECOND *PROPOSED BUILDING* YET NO PLANS
 WERE SUBMITTED FOR ANY NEW CONSTRUCTION.
 PLEASE VERIFY AS IT IS THE UNDERSTANDING OF THIS
 REVIEWER THAT THIS BUILDING ALREADY EXISTS AND WAS
 BUILT UNDER PREVIOUS PERMIT(S).
 PLEASE CLARIFY.
  
 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE LANDSCAPE PLANS DO NOT CONTAIN
 A *RAISED SEAL* AS REQUIRED UNDER FS 481.221
  
 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE CHAPTER 13.
 PLEASE SEE SPECIFICALLY 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND
 .1.3.
 PLANS ARE SUBMITTED WITH NO MINIMUM DESIGNS FOR THESE
 SECTIONS OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THESE CHANGES IN
 CHAPTER 13 WERE ADOPTED BY THE STATE OF FLORIDA OCTOBER
 1ST, 2005.THE LIGHTING CONTROLS ETC WERE PART OF A
 FEDERAL REQUIREMENT WHICH WAS PASSED IN JULY 04. PLEASE
 KNOW AS NO LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEM, DEVICES,
 SCHEDULING, MAXIMUM TIMES, OVER RIDE DEVICES ETC WERE
 SUBMITTED NO REVIEW OF THESE COULD BE DONE AT THIS
 TIME.
  
 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 13-413.1.ABC.2.1AND 2.2 AND
 PLACE NOTES ON PLANS ACCORDING TO THESE REQUIRED
 SECTIONS.
  
 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 13-413.1.ABC.1.1 AND .1.2.
 PLEASE PROVIDE WORST CASE VOLTAGE DROPS FOR BOTH
 FEEDERS AND BRANCH CIRCUITS.
  
 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC 13-415.1.AB.1, 13-415.2,
 13-415.1.A FOR ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND MINIMUM
 REQUIREMENTS FOR LIGHTING POWER ALLOWANCES.
 PLEASE SEE IN THIS CONTINUED NOTE THE INPUT DATA REPORT
 WILL BE FURTHER NOTED AS IDR.
 PLEASE SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1.3 AND 13-415.2.A FOR EXTERIOR
 LIGHTING ALLOWANCES. PLEASE SEE THE IDR SHOWS A TOTAL
 OF 12- 42W EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURES. HOW IS THIS
 POSSIBLE WHEN THE PLANS SHOW SUBSTANTIALLY MORE
 LIGHTING FIXTURES? PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLES: FIXTURES N,
 M, CC, BB, AA ETC.
 THIS IS ONLY TO NOTE A FEW. THE WATTAGES AS LISTED ON
 THE FIXTURE LEGEND CALL FOR FIXTURES AT 100W, 400W
 ETC.
 PLEASE BE SURE TO GO OVER ALL LIGHTING FIXTURES ON
 PLANS INSERT THESE INTO THE LIGHTING IDR.
 PLEASE SEE THE COMMENT IS ALSO FOR *ALL* INTERIOR
 LIGHTING FOR THE AMOUNT OF FIXTURES, THE WATTAGES OF
 FIXTURES, THE TYPES OF FIXTURES AND CONTROLS.
 HOW CAN THE CONTROL OF FIXTURES BE LISTED AS *MANUAL
 ON/OFF* WHEN THE CODE REQUIRES ALL LIGHTING ON
 AUTOMATED CONTROL DEVICES WHICH CAN RANGE FROM CENTRAL
 CONTROL, OCCUPANCY SENSORS, TIMERS ETC?
 ** PLEASE SEE NOTE #2 ABOVE AS NO LIGHTING CONTROLS
 WERE SUBMITTED THERE ARE MANY ITEMS WHICH CAN NOT BE
 REVIEWED AT THIS TIME.
  
 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS
 SUBMITTED DO NOT CONTAIN AN *ORIGINAL SIGNATURE* AS
 REQUIRED UNDER THE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
 61G15-23.002 AND FLORIDA STATUTES 471.025. IN FACT
 THESE CONTAIN A RAISED SEAL OVER A PHOTO-COPIED
 SIGNATURE WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED UNDER THESE SECTIONS
 AS STATED.
 PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETE THE INFORMATION ON THE COVE
 PAGE FOR ADDRESS ETC ALONG WITH OWNER AGENT SIGNATURE.
 PLEASE SEE 13-101.1.1.1, AND FS AND FAC ABOVE.
 ONE SET HAS BEEN RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE.
  
 10) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT THE WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR
 STRUCTURAL BUILDING REVIEW.
 FBC 106.1.2
  
 11) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY AIR CONDITIONING UNIT AT THE
 DOORWAY TO THE MAIN ELECTRICAL ROOM. IS THIS ABOVE THE
 DOOR?
 110.26
 FBC 106.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
  
 12) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED LIGHTING
 PHOTO-METRICS FOR ALL DESIGNATED EGRESS PATHS. PLEASE
 SEE THIS INCLUDES ALL STAIRS AND HALLWAYS UNDER NORMAL
 AND EMERGENCY.
 PLEASE SEE NFPA-101 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.1AND 7.9.2.2. PLEASE
 SEE NO INFORMATION ON PROPOSED BATTERY BACK UP SYSTEM
 WAS SUBMITTED. PLEASE PROVIDE MINIMUM RUN TIMES AND
 OUTPUT UNDER EMERGENCY IF LIGHTING LUMENS LEVELS ARE
 DECREASED.
 PLEASE SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURES SPEC/CUT SHEETS ON
 PROPOSED SYSTEM FOR REVIEW. 90.7, 110.3
 PLEASE SEE NEC 700.12F AND LIFE SAFETY CODE AS NOTED
 ABOVE ALONG WITH SECTIONS 7.8.2, AND ALL OF 7.9.3. FAC
 61G15-33.004
 FBC 106.1.2
  
 13) NOTE: PLEASE INDICATE ALL ROOM AND AREA
 DESIGNATIONS ON PLANS.
 SOME AREAS FOR CODE REQUIRED REVIEW CAN NOT BE
 DETERMINED AT THIS TIME FOR USE.
 FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. LS
 101, NEC 2005
  
 14) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL ELECTRICAL
 FIXTURES/OUTLETS ETC WHICH ARE MISSING CIRCUITING.
 PLEASE COMPLETE ALL CIRCUITING AND CORRELATE WITH PANEL
 SCHEDULES.
 FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2
 NEC 408.4, 240.4, 310.16, 700.12F ETC
  
 15) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ROOM 204 AS 110.26 APPEARS NOT TO
 HAVE BEEN MET FOR ECB PL.
 PLEASE BE SURE TO GO OVER ALL OTHER LOCATIONS.
  
 16) NOTE: PLEASE LABEL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MAINS ON
 PLANS. AS THE MAIN ELECTRICAL ROOM LAYOUT ON E-3.1.0
 DOES NOT LABEL EQUIPMENT, CODE COMPLIANCE FOR 230.70,
 71 AND 72 CAN NOT BE DONE AT THIS TIME.
  
 17) NOTE: PLANS INDICATE *LOCK OFF* DEVICES ON SEVERAL
 ITEMS. PLEASE KNOW *LOCK OFF* DEVICE VARY IN USE AND
 LISTINGS. MANY OF THESE DEVICES ARE LISTED FOR
 TEMPORARY USE ONLY AND/OR FALL OFF EQUIPMENT ONCE A
 PANEL COVER ETC IS REMOVED. THESE WILL BE VERIFIED IN
 FIELD. IF UPON DETERMINATION THE CORRECT DEVICES ARE
 NOT INSTALLED PERMANENT MEANS WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE
 INSTALLED OR ALTERNATE METHODS OF MEETING CODE WILL BE
 REQUIRED.
 700.12, 110.3, 90.7 ETC
 ** WILL BE REDLINED ON FINAL PERMITTED SET OF PLANS
 ISSUED**
  
 18) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE LEGEND FOR FIRE ALARM DEVICES
 ON PLANS INDICATES MINIMUM LEVELS FOR CANDELA RATINGS
 TO BE 75CD WHICH IS WHAT IS REQUIRED PER FBC
 11-4.28.3(4). HOWEVER PLEASE SEE SOME CD LEVELS ARE
 BEING SHOWN WITH LESS THAN THE MINIMUM REQUIRED FOR ADA
 COMPLIANCE.
 PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE: CRYING ROOM. PLEASE SEE OTHER
 POSSIBLE AREAS.
 PLEASE SEE 11-4.28.1, .2 AND .3(4) FOR ALL DEVICES FOR
 ADA COMPLIANCE FOR LOCATIONS AND LEVELS.
 ** ONLY ONE EXAMPLE WAS GIVEN.
  
 19) NOTE: PLANS MENTIONS POSSIBLE LIGHTNING PROTECTION
 SYSTEM. PLEASE PLACE NOTE ON PLANS WHICH REQUIRES ANY
 PROPOSED OR INSTALLED SYSTEM SHALL MEET NFPA-780. ( OR
 WORDS TO THAT AFFECT)
  
 20) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PLANS ARE MISSING PANEL SCHEDULE
 FOR PANELS PL AND HL. NO REVIEW CAN BE DONE AT THIS
 TIME FOR CIRCUITS, OVER CURRENT PROTECTION ETC
 NEC 408.4, 310.16, 240.4
  
 21) NOTE: PLEASE SEE RISER AS RISER INDICATES PANEL L1
 AS A SINGLE PANEL HOWEVER ON SHEET E-5.1.0 THERE ARE
 TWO PANELS L1. THE SECOND PANEL L1 IN NOTES MENTIONS
 THIS IS FED FROM PANEL P1. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE WHEN
 RISER SHOWS ONLY ONE PANEL AND PANEL P1 ALREADY FEEDS A
 SECTION TWO OF P1?
 ** PLEASE COMPLETE AND CORRELATE ALL PANELS AND
 LABELING OF PANELS. AS THERE ARE PANELS MISSING ETC
 SOME ITEMS FOR CODE REVIEW CAN NOT BE DONE AT THIS
 TIME.
  
 22) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.63 AND 210.8 AS AC EQUIPMENT
 IS MISSING NEW OR EXISTING SERVICE RECEPTACLES.
  
 ** PLEASE KNOW ONE SET OF ELECTRICAL PLANS ARE BEING
 RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE ALONG WITH ONE COPY OF THE
 ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED.
  
 ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY
 COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE
 DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE.
 PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION.
  
 DEWEY PALMER
 ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT.
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 561-805-6717
 [email protected]
2007-12-11 17:14:041-SET IN ELECTRICAL FOR REVIEW.

Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2008-11-18 Cont ID  
Sent By mgonzale Date 2008-11-18 Time 16:08 Rev Time 1.00
Received By mgonzale Date   Time   Sent To ENG
Notes
2008-11-18 16:07:50- PASSED -
  
 COORDINATION WAS MADE WITH ENGINEERING THRU EMERY
 FABIAN. NORTHERN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT OWNS CANAL.
 WATER AND SEWER WILL BE THE CITY OF WPB. ANY FURTHER
 QUESTIONS FEEL FREE TO CONTACT:
  
 MANUEL J GONZALEZ, PROJECT COORDINATOR
 LOCATION ADDRESS:
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 1000 - 45TH STREET, SUITE 15
 WEST PALM BEACH FL 33407
 MAILING ADDRESS:
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 P.O. BOX 3506
 WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401
 TELEPHONE:
 45TH STREET OFFICE : 561-494-1040
 45TH DIRECT: 561-494-1085
 FAX: 561-494-1117
 CITY HALL OFFICE: (561) 805-6723
 CITY HALL DIRECT: (561) 805-6327
 CITY HALL FAX: (561) 805-6731 OR 805-6676
 NEXTEL: 561-644-7301
 NEXTEL DIRECT CONNECT: 159*28165*38
 EMERGENCIES:
 CENTRAL OPERATIONS CENTER (DISPATCH) 561-822-2210
 E-MAIL:
 [email protected]
  

Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2008-05-29 Cont ID  
Sent By rchokshi Date 2008-05-29 Time 14:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rchokshi Date 2008-05-29 Time 14:39 Sent To  
Notes
2008-05-29 14:48:39FAILED FOR FOLLOWING REASONS:
  
 1.PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE STORM WATER QUALITY
 CALCULATIONS, SFWMD PERMIT, GEO-TECH REPORT,
 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY TO 100045TH STREET FOR THEIR
 APPROVAL BEFORE WE ISSUE A PERMIT.
  
 2. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGS THE SILT FENCE AROUND THE
 WHOLE SITE,& TURBIDITY AROUND CATCH BASINS DURING
 CONSTRUCTION AND ALL DEMOLITION PHASE.HEIGHT OF FENCE
 SHOULD BE HIGH ENOUGH PER FDEP TO STOP DUST PARTICLES.
  
 3. WATER & SEWER PLANS MUST BE APPROVED FROM 45TH
 STREET (MANNY G.), UTILITY DEPT BEFORE WE APPROVE.
  
 PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR
 PERMITTING PROCESS
  
 RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723

Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2007-12-12 Cont ID  
Sent By rchokshi Date 2007-12-12 Time 10:08 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rchokshi Date 2007-12-12 Time 10:04 Sent To  
Notes
2007-12-12 10:08:45FAILED FOR FOLLOWING REASONS:
  
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF NOTICE OF INTENT (NOI).
 PLEASE APPLY AT FDEP, NPDES STORMWATER SECTION FOR
 NOI.
 YOU CAN GET NOI INFO FROM
 WWW.DEP.STATE.FL.US/WATER/STORMWATER/NPDES/
 NOTICE OF INTENT DEP FORM 62-621.300(4)(B),
 EFFECTIVE MAY 1, 2003
  
 2. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWING ALL CITY STANDARDS NOTES FOR
 SIDEWALK, DRIVEWAY, APPROACH, PARKINGS, HANDICAP
 PARKINGS, DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, YOU CAN GET A C D FOR ALL
 CITY STANDARDS NOTES FROM 1000, 45 STREET, ENGINEERING
 SERVICES, PHONE# 494-1040
  
 3. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGSDUMPSTER & ITS ENCLOSURE
 DETAILS PER CITY OF WPB, &LOCATION ON DWG, LOCATION
 MUST BE ACCESSIBLE FOR PICKUP TRUCK.
  
 4. PLEASE SHOW ON CALCULATION THAT YOU HAVE CONSIDERED
 FLOOD ZONE AREA, & 5,10, 25, 100 YEAR FLOOD CRITERIA
 AND CROWN OF THE ROAD WHEN YOU DETERMINE THE FIRST
 FLOOR ELEVATION. FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION SHOULD BE
 ATLEAST 1 FOOT HIGHER THAN HIGHEST CROWN OF THE ROAD.
  
 5. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAINAGE DRAWINGTHE SITE AREA,
 GREEN, LAKE,PARKING AREA, IMPERVIOUS,PERVIOUS AREAYOU
 ARE DEVELOPING FOR THIS PROJECT . PLEASEMAKE SURE
 THESE AREAS SHOWN ON DRAINAGE DRAWINGS MUST MATCH WITH
 AND USED IN STORM WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS. PLEASE
 PROVIDE A COPY OF THESE WATER QUALITYCALCULATIONS.
  
 6. PLEASE SHOW ALL STORM WATER PIPES AROUND YOUR SITE
 SO, WE CANSEE THE LAYOUT OF STORM WATER PIPES FROM
 ALL OTHER STORM WATER PIPES. PLEASE SHOW DETAIL OF THE
 CONTROL STRUCTURESWITH ELEVATIONS, NOTCHES, BLEEDING
 ELEVATION, ETC ON DRAWINGS, CALCULATION FOR
 EXFILTRATION TRENCHES, PLEASE SHOW DRY DETENTION/WET
 DETENTION AREAS IN STORM WATER CALS IF YOU HAVE ALL
 THESE.
  
 7. ALSO PLEASE SHOW ALL CATCH BASINS NEAREST,AROUND
 YOUR SITE FOR STORM WATER DRAIN SO YOUR SITE DO NOT GET
 FLOODED AND HAVE ENOUGH DRAINS.
  
 8. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF SFWMD PERMIT,,GEO-TECH
 REPORT &STORM WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS. STORM WATER
 CALS MUST BE APPROVED FROM 100045TH STREET
 ENGINEERING SERVICES.
  
 9. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGS THE POLLUTION PREVENTION
 DETAILS,CLOTHES USED FOR SILT ETC., PLANS SHOWING SILT
 FENCE AROUND THE SITE & CATCH BASINS DURING
 CONSTRUCTION AND ALL DEMOLITION PHASE.HEIGHT OF FENCE
 SHOULD BE HIGH ENOUGH PER FDEP TO STOP DUST PARTICLES.
  
 10. WATER & SEWER PLANS MUST BE APPROVED FROM 45TH
 STREET (MANNY G.), UTILITY DEPT BEFORE WE APPROVED.
  
 PLEASE RESPOND EACH ITEM IN DETAIL TO EXPEDITE YOUR
 PERMITTING PROCESS
  
 RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723
  

Review Stop ENG-F ENGINEERING FINAL DRAWING REV
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2009-09-15 Cont ID  
Sent By efabian Date 2009-09-15 Time 09:28 Rev Time 0.50
Received By efabian Date 2009-09-15 Time 09:28 Sent To Z
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2009-07-07 Cont ID  
Sent By mawillia Date 2009-07-07 Time 14:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mawillia Date 2009-07-07 Time 13:57 Sent To B
Notes
2009-07-07 14:01:00*****REVISION #10, DATED 3/20/09, APPROVED*****
  
 REVISED PLAN SHEETS A-2.1.3, A-2.2.3, A-7.2.1,
 FP-2.1.0, FP-2.2.0, E-2.1.0, E-2.2.0, E-3.1.0, AND
 E-3.2.0 WERE STAMPED, INITIALED, AND DATED.
  
  
 CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS
 FIRE PLAN REVIEW
 561-805-6722

Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2008-12-11 Cont ID  
Sent By mawillia Date 2008-12-11 Time 10:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mawillia Date 2008-12-11 Time 09:29 Sent To  
Notes
2008-12-11 09:31:19*****APPROVED*****
  
  
 PREVIOUSLY UNSTAMPED SHEETS A-2.1.3, A-2.2.3, AND
 A-7.2.1 WERE STAMPED, INITIALED, AND DATED; PLAN SHEETS
 FP-0.1.1, FP-2.1.0, FP-2.2.0, E-2.1.0, E-2.2.0, E-3.1.0
 & E-3.2.0 WERE ALREADY FIRE-STAMPED ON 11/19/2008.
  
  
 CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS
 FIRE PLAN REVIEW
 561-805-6722

Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2008-11-19 Cont ID  
Sent By mawillia Date 2008-11-19 Time 16:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mawillia Date 2008-11-19 Time 14:48 Sent To  
Notes
2008-11-19 16:05:04*****PARTIAL APPROVAL*****
  
  
 THE COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE PLAN REVIEWS HAVE
 BEEN ADDRESSED. PLAN SHEETS FP-0.1.1, FP-2.1.0,
 FP-2.2.0, E-2.1.0, E-2.2.0, E-3.1.0 & E-3.2.0; SHEETS
 A-2.1.3, A-2.2.3, AND A-7.2.1 TO BE FIRE-STAMPED WHEN
 THE BUILDING EXAMINER'S COMMENTS HAVE BEEN SATISFIED.
  
  
 CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS
 FIRE PLAN REVIEW
 561-805-6722

Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2008-06-12 Cont ID  
Sent By mwennerg Date 2008-06-12 Time 11:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mwennerg Date 2008-06-12 Time 11:04 Sent To  
Notes
2008-06-12 11:13:37***DENIED***
  
 MOST OF THE COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. PLEASE SEE
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENT NUMBERS TO CORRESPOND WITH THE
 FIRST FIRE REVIEW:
  
 05. NOTE TO READ: ELECTRONIC SWITCHES SHALL BE REQUIRED
 ON CONTROL VALVES. ADD NOTE REFERENCING CHAIN AND LOCK
 PER LOCAL REQUIREMENTS IN ADDITION TO ELECTRONIC
 SUPERVISION.
  
 08. OCCUPANT LOAD SIGNS REQUIRED FOR ASSEMBLY AREAS NOT
 HAVING FIXED SEATING. SIGNS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM BUREAU
 OF FIRE PREVENTION, (561) 804-4756.
  
 13. NFPA 101, 2003 EDITION SEC. 12.3.3.4 REQUIRES
 INTERIOR FINISH OF CLASS A OR CLASS B FOR SCREENS ON
 WHICH PICTURES ARE PROJECTED.
  
 15. OK FOUND ON DOOR SCHEDULE.
  
 17. PLEASE INDICATE THE SHEET NUMBER THAT REFERENCES
 INFORMATION REGARDING KNOX LOCKING CAPS FOR FIRE
 DEPARTMENT CONNECTION.
  
  
 MIKE WENNERGREN, ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL
 FIRE PLAN REVIEW
 FIRE PREVENTION (561) 804-4756

Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2008-01-04 Cont ID  
Sent By mawillia Date 2008-01-04 Time 14:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mawillia Date 2008-01-03 Time 22:41 Sent To  
Notes
2008-01-03 23:20:56*****DENIED*****
  
  
 05. ON SHEET FP 4 IN THE DOUBLE CHECK DETECTOR ASSEMBLY
 DETAIL, INDICATE IN THE NOTES AND/OR ILLUSTRATE THAT
 THE DEVICE IS TO BE CHAINED AND LOCKED (AS PER WEST
 PALM BEACH FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU) .
  
 08. ON SHEET A-0.1.1, PROVIDE THE OCCUPANT LOAD LOAD
 FOR THIS NEW ASSEMBLY STRUCTURE, AS IN THE NUMBER OF
 PERSONS WHOM MEANS OF EGRESS AND OTHER PROVISIONS ARE
 REQUIRED.
  
 17. PLEASE NOTE AND (OR) ILLUSTRATE ON AN APPROPIATE
 PLAN SHEET THAT KNOX LOCKING CAPS WILL BE REQUIRED ON
 FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION (FDC). FOR APPLICATIONS,
 CONTACT WEST PALM BEACH FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU AT
 561-804-4724.
  
  
  
  
  
  
 TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER INDICATING WHERE IN THE PLAN EACH ITEM WAS
 ADDRESSED
  
  
 CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS
 FIRE PLAN REVIEW
 561-805-6722

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 7 Status N Date 2009-09-08 Cont ID  
Sent By jwitmer Date 2009-09-08 Time 11:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jwitmer Date 2009-09-08 Time 11:32 Sent To  
Notes
2009-09-08 11:33:56INCOMING TO C-14

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 6 Status N Date 2009-09-03 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2009-09-03 Time 11:03 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2009-09-03 Time 11:03 Sent To  
Notes
2009-09-03 11:08:24SENT TO ZONING. (LANDSCAPE RK)

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 5 Status N Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 2009-06-04 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rmcdouga Date 2009-06-04 Time 16:39 Sent To  
Notes
2009-06-04 16:39:16TO C40

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 4 Status N Date 2008-12-08 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2008-12-08 Time 08:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2008-12-08 Time 08:17 Sent To  
Notes
2008-12-08 08:22:12TO "COMM" BD#41-PLANS ON RACK/4 ROLLS AND PAPERWORK

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 2008-10-22 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2008-10-22 Time 17:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2008-10-22 Time 17:04 Sent To  
Notes
2008-10-22 17:04:59TO "COMM" BD#55/PLANS ON RACK/3 ROLLS/3 BINDERS

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 2 Status N Date 2008-05-13 Cont ID  
Sent By adarroug Date 2008-05-13 Time 12:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By adarroug Date 2008-05-13 Time 12:40 Sent To  
Notes
2008-05-13 12:43:27TO "COMM" BD#31--PLANS ON RACK--4 ROLLS, 3 BINDERS

Review Stop I INCOMING/PROCESSING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 2008-01-06 Cont ID  
Sent By mawillia Date 2008-01-06 Time 21:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mawillia Date 2007-11-30 Time 14:32 Sent To  
Notes
2007-11-30 16:33:02TO "COMM" BD#43
2007-11-30 14:32:14WAITING FOR "COMM" BD

Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2009-09-17 Cont ID  
Sent By rkussner Date 2009-09-17 Time 17:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rkussner Date 2009-09-17 Time 17:58 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 2009-09-03 Cont ID  
Sent By rkussner Date 2009-09-03 Time 11:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rkussner Date 2009-09-03 Time 11:55 Sent To Z
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2009-06-27 Cont ID  
Sent By rregueir Date 2009-06-25 Time 14:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rregueir Date 2009-06-22 Time 16:02 Sent To  
Notes
2009-06-27 14:05:50M-2.1.0, M-2.2.0, M-2.3.0 REVISION 10

Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2008-12-11 Cont ID  
Sent By rregueir Date 2008-12-11 Time 17:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rregueir Date 2008-12-11 Time 17:55 Sent To PC
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2008-11-08 Cont ID  
Sent By rregueir Date 2008-11-08 Time 14:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rregueir Date 2008-11-08 Time 13:45 Sent To  
Notes
2008-11-08 14:14:21PLANS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND
 STAMPED. REVIEW IS NOT PASSED DUE TO FAILED REVIEW OF
 ENERGY CALCULATIONS.
  
 ENERGY CALCS: THE EFFICIENCIES LISTED IN THE INPUT
 REPORT (IR) DO NOT CORRESPOND WITH THE FAN RATINGS
 SHOWN ON THE MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL PLANS.
 EXAMPLE: AHU-1 IN THE IR SHOWS AN EFFICIENCY OF 1.25.
 THE EFFICIENCY IS DETERMINED USING THE FORMULA
 CFM/WATTS. AHU-1 CALLS FOR 10,800 CFM AND ELECTRICAL
 PLANS SHOW THE FAN FOR AHU-1 RATED AT 16.7 KVA OR
 16,700 WATTS. THIS GIVES AN EFFICIENCY RATING FOR AHU-1
 OF 0.65, WELL BELOW THE 1.25 RATING SHOWN ON THE IR.
 PLEASE CHECK THIS AND ALL OTHER AHU FANS AND MAKE THE
 NECESSARY CORRECTIONS IN THE INPUT REPORT.
  
 IF SOMEONE WOULD LIKE TO CONTACT ME TO DISCUSS THE
 POSSIBILITY OF CORRECTING THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS
 DURING THIS REVIEW CYCLE, PLEASE CONTACT ME AT THE
 PHONE NUMBER OR EMAIL ADDRESS LISTED BELOW.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT:
 RONALD J. REGUEIRO
 561.805.6719
 [email protected]

Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2008-06-03 Cont ID  
Sent By rregueir Date 2008-06-03 Time 10:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rregueir Date 2008-05-30 Time 11:05 Sent To  
Notes
2008-06-03 10:50:43REVIEW #: 2ND
 ACTION: DENIED
  
 FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS
 FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH
 PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL AS DESIGNER'S WRITTEN
 RESPONSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUITY.
  
 1. OK
  
 2. OK
  
 3. OK EXCEPT, THE DUCTS CONNECTED TO VTU-3-5 DO NOT
 QUALIFY FOR THE EXCEPTION TO THE SMOKE DAMPER
 REQUIREMENTS UNDER FBCM 607.5.4(3) BECAUSE THE DUCT
 CONNECTION TO THE VTU IS SHOWN AS FLEX ACCORDING TO
 DETAIL 11 ON PG M-6.0.1. ALL DUCTS MUST BE MIN. 26 GAGE
 TO QUALIFY FOR EXCEPTION #3 UNDER THIS SECTION.
  
 4 THROUGH 11: OK
  
 12. ARCHITECT?S WRITTEN RESPONSE IS, ?SEE ENGINEER?S
 RESPONSES.?
 ENGINEER?S RESPONSE IS, ?ARCHITECT TO RESPOND.? NO
 INFORMATION COULD BE FOUND IN PLANS OR SUBMITTALS TO
 RESPOND TO THIS COMMENT. ALSO, NO INFORMATION COULD BE
 FOUND REGARDING ROOF MOUNTED HOODS. SHOW ROOF MOUNTED
 HOODS, OR ROOF VENTILATORS ARE DESIGNED, AND HOW THEY
 WILL BE INSTALLED TO RESIST ANTICIPATED WIND PRESSURES
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCM 301.13.
  
 13 THROUGH 17: OK
  
 18. ENERGY CALCULATIONS: ALL AHU?S ARE LISTED IN THE
 INPUT DATA REPORT AS ?AIR COOLED PACKAGE? SYSTEMS. THIS
 IS NOT CORRECT. THE AIR HANDLERS ARE NOT PACKAGE
 SYSTEMS. PACKAGE SYSTEMS UTILIZE COMPRESSORS AND
 REFRIGERANT LINES, NOT CHILLED WATER COILS. AIR
 HANDLERS DO NOT HAVE THE SAME TYPE OF EFFICIENCY
 RATINGS AS PACKAGE SYSTEMS. THE END RESULT IS THAT THE
 ENERGY CALCULATIONS SHOW A TOTAL OF 400 TONS OF COOLING
 RATHER THAN THE 200 TONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND A
 CREDIT IS BEING RECEIVED FOR EFFICIENCY RATINGS WHICH
 ARE NOT APPLICABLE. THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SHALL
 ACCURATELY REFLECT THE WORK SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND
 SPECIFICATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB 13-103.2. PLEASE
 CORRECT AND RESUBMIT.
  
 19. OK
  
 NOTE: A CALL WAS PLACED TO TLC ENGINEERING AND A
 VOICEMAIL WAS LEFT FOR MR. WAMSLEY ON 5/30/08 IN AN
 EFFORT TO SEE IF ANY OF THESE OUTSTANDING ITEMS COULD
 BE ADDRESSED DURING THIS REVIEW. NO RETURN PHONE CALL
 WAS RECEIVED.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT:
 RONALD J. REGUEIRO
 561.805.6719
 [email protected]

Review Stop M MECHANICAL (A/C)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2007-12-11 Cont ID  
Sent By rregueir Date 2007-12-11 Time 10:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rregueir Date 2007-12-07 Time 14:38 Sent To  
Notes
2007-12-11 10:15:47REVIEW #: 1ST
 ACTION: DENIED
  
 FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 STATE AMENDMENTS
 FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
  
 1. M-0.1.1: VENTILATION DESIGN CRITERIA NOTE #1 STATES
 THE VENTILATION RATE PROCEDURE IS PER ASHRAE 62
 ADDENDUM N. THIS ADDENDUM IS PART OF ASHRAE 62-2001.
 ALL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT AFTER DEC.
 8, 2006 SHALL BE DESIGNED TO EITHER FBC, M SEC.403 OR
 ASHRAE 62.1-2004 W/ APPROVED ADDENDA IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 FBC, M 403.4. DECLARE THE METHOD USED AND SHOW THE
 VENTILATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE SPECIFIED METHOD. VENTILATION AND EXHAUST SYSTEMS
 CAN NOT BE REVIEWED AT THIS TIME.
  
 2. M-2.1.0: BASED ON LOCATIONS OF RATED WALLS AS SHOWN
 ON PG A-2.1.3, THERE ARE SEVERAL DUCTS PENETRATING
 RATED WALL ASSEMBLIES WITHOUT OPENING PROTECTIVES (SUCH
 AS FIRE DAMPERS) AS REQUIRED BY FBC, M 607.5. EXAMPLES:
 THERE IS AN 8 INCH ROUND SUPPLY AND AN 8X6 RETURN
 PENETRATING THE CORRIDOR WALL AT STORAGE ROOM 142
 WITHOUT ANY OPENING PROTECTIVES SHOWN AT THESE
 LOCATIONS. THIS OCCURS IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT
 CORRIDOR 173. PLEASE CHECK ALL AREAS AND SHOW HOW THESE
 OPENINGS ARE TO BE PROTECTED.
  
 3. M-2.1.0: CORRIDORS 173 AND 167 ARE SHOWN TO BE 1
 HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE RATED ON PG A-2.1.3. A LISTED
 SMOKE DAMPER DESIGNED TO RESIST THE PASSAGE OF SMOKE
 SHALL BE PROVIDED AT EACH POINT A DUCT OR AIR TRANSFER
 OPENING PENETRATES A CORRIDOR ENCLOSURE REQUIRED TO
 HAVE SMOKE AND DRAFT CONTROL DOORS IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 SECTION 715.3.3. SEE FBC 716.5.4.1.
 NOTE: FBC 715.3.3 REQUIRES DOORS IN A 1 HOUR FIRE
 RESISTANCE RATED CORRIDOR TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR
 A SMOKE-AND DRAFT-CONTROL DOOR ASSEMBLY TESTED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH UL 1784, WHICH TRIGGERS THE REQUIREMENT
 FOR SMOKE DAMPERS IN FBC 716.5.4.1.
  
 4. M-2.1.0: CORRIDORS 111, 118 AND 120 ARE NOT SHOWN ON
 PLANS TO BE FIRE RESISTANCE RATED. HOWEVER, BASED ON
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF FBC TABLE 1016.1, THESE CORRIDORS
 MAY BE REQUIRED TO BE RATED. PLEASE SEE BUILDING PLAN
 REVIEW FOR REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO THIS ISSUE.
 NOTE: IF THESE CORRIDORS ARE REQUIRED TO BE RATED, THEY
 ARE SUBJECT TO THE SAME REQUIREMENTS AS STATED IN
 COMMENTS 2 AND 3 ABOVE. PLEASE COORDINATE WITH
 ARCHITECT TO ASSURE LOCATIONS OF RATED ASSEMBLIES AND
 OPENING PROTECTIVES CORRESPOND ON ALL PLANS.
  
 5. M-2.1.0: ROOM 127 BOYS RESTROOM SHOWS 8 INCH ROUND
 DUCT TURNING DOWN WITH A FIRE DAMPER. THIS FIRE DAMPER
 APPEARS TO BE IN MID-AIR AND SERVING NO PURPOSE. IS
 THIS DAMPER INTENDED TO BE LOCATED AT THE WALL
 PENETRATION RATHER THAN IN THE VERTICAL DUCT? PLEASE
 CLARIFY. FIRE DAMPERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION, AND THE
 MANUFACTURER?S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS AND LISTING IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH FBC, M 607.2.
  
 6. M-2.1.0: EXHAUST DISCHARGE FOR RESTROOMS 127 AND 128
 APPEARS TO BE DISCHARGING ONTO A WALKWAY. OUTDOOR
 EXHAUST OPENINGS SHALL BE LOCATED SO AS NOT TO CREATE A
 NUISANCE. EXHAUST AIR SHALL NOT BE DIRECTED ONTO
 WALKWAYS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC, M 401.5.2.
  
 7. M-2.1.0 AND M-2.2.0: THREE DUCTS FROM AHU-7 ON 2ND
 FLOOR ARE SHOWN PENETRATING BLOCK WALL WHEN LEAVING
 ROOM 214 AND RUNNING IN TRUSSES ABOVE CORRIDOR 167.
 THIS CORRIDOR IS SHOWN AS FIRE RESISTANCE RATED.
 OPENING PROTECTIVES ARE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN FIRE
 RATING AT THIS LOCATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC, M 607.5
 AND FBC, M 607.5.4.
  
 8. M-2.2.0: DUCT PENETRATIONS AT BLOWER ROOM 208 DO NOT
 SHOW OPENING PROTECTIVES. SHOW HOW THESE OPENINGS ARE
 TO BE PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC, M 607.5.
  
 9. M-2.2.0: FIRE DAMPERS ARE SHOWN AT DUCT PENETRATIONS
 OF NON-RATED WALLS AT ROOMS 212 AND 214. FIRE DAMPERS
 CAN NOT BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR LISTING
 IF THEY ARE NOT INSTALLED IN RATED ASSEMBLIES. SHOW
 COMPLIANCE WITH FBC, M 607.2. IF RATED WALLS ARE
 REQUIRED AT THESE LOCATIONS, PLEASE COORDINATE WITH
 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. IF RATED WALLS ARE NOT REQUIRED AT
 THESE LOCATIONS, PLEASE REMOVE FIRE DAMPERS FROM THESE
 WALLS IN ORDER TO COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
  
 10. M-2.2.0: CATWALKS ARE SHOWN ABOVE THE SANCTUARY TO
 PROVIDE ACCESS TO ROOF HATCH AND MOTORIZED DAMPERS AT
 RELIEF VENTS. DETAIL 7 ON PG S-7 HAS NO DIMENSIONS
 RELATED TO SPACING AND HEIGHTS OF GUARDS FOR THE
 CATWALKS. PLEASE PROVIDE ALL DIMENSIONAL INFORMATION TO
 SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC, M 304.10.
  
 11. M-4.1.0: DETAIL 4, FCU-1 IS SHOWN APPROX. 2 FEET
 FROM THE WALL OF THE STAIRWELL. SHOW HOW MINIMUM
 SERVICE ACCESS CLEARANCE IS TO BE ACHIEVED IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH FBC, M 306.1 AND MANUFACTURER?S
 INSTRUCTIONS.
  
 12. M-4.1.0: OUTSIDE AIR INTAKES, WALL LOUVERS ARE
 DEFINED AS PANEL WALLS PER FAC RULE 9B-72. AS SUCH, A
 PRODUCT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. PROVIDE A COMPLETE
 PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE TYPE OF LOUVERS TO BE USED TO
 SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC, M 401.5.1. FOR MORE
 INFORMATION ON THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM,
 PLEASE VISIT: WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG
  
 13. M-6.0.2: DETAIL 1, FIRE DAMPERS, SMOKE DAMPERS,
 COMBINATION FIRE/SMOKE DAMPERS AND CEILING DAMPERS
 LOCATED WITHIN AIR DISTRIBUTION AND SMOKE CONTROL
 SYSTEMS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION, AND THE MANUFACTURER?S
 INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS AND LISTING IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH FBC, M 607.2. PLEASE VERIFY THAT THE DETAIL ON
 PLANS IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE DAMPER MANUFACTURER?S
 INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS OR THE PLANS MAY DEFER TO THE
 MANUFACTURER?S INSTRUCTIONS.
  
 14. M-6.0.2: DETAIL 2, THE THROUGH-PENETRATION FIRESTOP
 SYSTEM SHOWN SAYS AT BOTTOM ?PIPE/INSULATED.? HOWEVER,
 THIS DETAIL DOES NOT ACCOMMODATE INSULATED PIPE, RATHER
 IT CALLS FOR PACKING MATERIAL TO BE USED AS A FORM.
 ALSO PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS DETAIL IS FOR IRON/STEEL
 PIPE PENETRATING CONCRETE ASSEMBLIES ONLY, NOT FOR
 COPPER OR FOR PENETRATING FRAMED/GYPSUM ASSEMBLIES.
 PLEASE VERIFY THAT THIS SYSTEM MEETS ALL THE NEEDS FOR
 THIS PROJECT OR PROVIDE ADDITIONAL THROUGH-PENETRATION
 SYSTEMS FOR OTHER CONDITIONS NOT COVERED BY THIS
 ASSEMBLY. FBC 712.3 AND 712.4.
  
 15. M-7.0.1: SEQUENCE OF OPERATION: EXHAUST FANS ARE
 SHOWN TO BE CONTROLLED BY THE EMS. HOWEVER, FAN
 SCHEDULE ON M-5.0.1 CALLS FOR FANS TO BE CONTROLLED BY
 EITHER INTERLOCK WITH AHU OR LIGHT SWITCH. PLEASE
 CLARIFY HOW THE FANS ARE TO BE CONTROLLED AND MEET THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF FBC, M 401.3.
  
 16. M-7.0.1: SYSTEMS WITH DESIGN OUTSIDE AIR CAPACITIES
 GREATER THAN 3,000 CFM (1.4 M3/S) SERVING AREAS HAVING
 AN AVERAGE DESIGN OCCUPANCY DENSITY EXCEEDING 100
 PEOPLE PER 1,000 FEET (93 M3) SHALL INCLUDE MEANS TO
 AUTOMATICALLY REDUCE OUTSIDE AIR INTAKE BELOW DESIGN
 RATES WHEN SPACES ARE PARTIALLY OCCUPIED. SHOW
 VENTILATION CONTROLS FOR HIGH-OCCUPANCY AREAS IN
 COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 13-409.1.ABC.3.5.
  
 17. M-7.0.1: SHOW OPTIMUM START CONTROLS IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH FBC 13-407.1.ABC.2.4.2.
  
 18. ENERGY CALCULATIONS: THE SIGNATURE OF MR. WAMSLEY
 ON THE FRONT PAGE, WITH THE SEAL AFFIXED, AS WELL AS
 THE SIGNATURE ON THE CERTIFICATIONS PAGE ARE
 PHOTOCOPIES ON ALL 3 SETS OF CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED. A
 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SHALL SIGN HIS NAME AND AFFIX HIS
 SEAL TO ALL PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, REPORTS, FINAL BID
 DOCUMENTS PROVIDED TO THE OWNER OR THE OWNER?S
 REPRESENTATIVE, OR OTHER DOCUMENTS PREPARED OR ISSUED
 BY SAID REGISTRANT AND BEING FILED FOR PUBLIC RECORD IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH FAC RULE 61G15-23.002(1). ONLY ORIGINAL
 SIGNATURES SHALL BE PROVIDED AND SEALED IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH THIS RULE. PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WITH
 ORIGINAL SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF THE DESIGNER RESPONSIBLE
 FOR THEIR PREPARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC
 13-103.1.1.1.
  
 19. ENERGY CALCULATIONS: THE COMPLIANCE FORM WAS NOT
 SIGNED BY THE OWNER OR THE OWNER?S AGENT. THE
 BUILDING?S OWNER, THE OWNER?S ARCHITECT, OR OTHER
 AUTHORIZED AGENT LEGALLY DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER SHALL
 CERTIFY THAT THE BUILDING IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE
 CODE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC 13-103.1.2.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT:
 RONALD J. REGUEIRO
 561.805.6719
 [email protected]

Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 2009-06-29 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2009-06-29 Time 10:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2009-06-29 Time 10:36 Sent To  
Notes
2009-06-29 10:37:51REVISION OK -- SHTS P-2.1.0, P-3.1.0 & P-4.1.0.

Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 2008-05-30 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2008-05-30 Time 09:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2008-05-30 Time 09:30 Sent To  
Notes
2008-05-30 09:36:17 
  
 PASSED/PROVISO
  
 RPZV BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE AT LEAST THE SAME
 SIZE AS THE LINE IN WHICH THEY ARE INSTALLED. (SEE
 CIVIL SHEET 2 OF 12). TABLE 603.1(D).

Review Stop P PLUMBING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2007-12-22 Cont ID  
Sent By kstevens Date 2007-12-22 Time 06:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By kstevens Date 2007-12-15 Time 17:30 Sent To  
Notes
2007-12-22 06:57:04DENIED
 REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING
 FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1
 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
 FLORIDA STATUTES
  
 1. SHT P-0.1.1 ELECTRIC WATER HEATER - 2 DETAIL
 INDICATES THE EMERGENCY PAN DRAIN DRAINING TO A FLOOR
 DRAIN OR MOP SINK. FLOOR DRAINS ARE NOT APPROVED
 INDIRECT WASTE RECEPTORS. EITHER A FLOOR SINK OR HUB
 DRAIN IS REQUIRED. SECTIONS 802.3 & 802.3.2. PLEASE
 CORRECT DETAIL.
  
 2.SHTSLP-1 THRU LP-4 NOT SEALED AS REQUIRED BY FAC
 61G1-16.003, FS 481.2055 & SECTION 106.1. AN EMBOSSED
 SEAL IS REQUIRED. ALSO THE FIRM LICENSE NUMBER SHALL BE
 INDICATED ON EACH SHEET. FAC 61G1-16.001,
 61G1-16.004(2) & FS 481.306.
  
 3. SHTSP-2.2.0 NO SECONDARY ROOF DRAIN OR EMERGENCY
 OVERFLOW SCUPPER IS INDICATED ON THE SMALL ROOF, RD-1
 (260SF), AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 1107. PLEASE INDICATE
 THE LOCATION OF THE SECONDARY ROOF DRAIN OR EMERGENCY
 OVERFLOW SCUPPER AND INDICATE THE SIZE OF THE DRAIN OR
 SCUPPER. (LENGTH, WIDTH, HEIGHT). SECTION 106.1.2.
  
 4. SHT P-3.1.0 DETAILS 1, 2 & 6NO WASTE ARMS FOR THE
 DRINKING FOUNTAINS ARE SHOWN. PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTION
 106.1.1.
  
 5. SHT P-3.1.0 DETAIL 4 THE FLOOR DRAINS SHALL CONNECT
 TO THE VENTED BRANCH LINE, NOT THE SHOWER DRAIN LINE.
 SECTION 901.2.1.
  
 6. SHT P-4.1.0 DETAIL 4 THE FLOOR DRAINS SHALL CONNECT
 TO THE VENTED BRANCH LINE, NOT THE SHOWER DRAIN LINE.
 SECTION 901.2.1.
  
 7. SHT P-4.1.0 DETAIL 6 DOES NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR
 PLAN. THE FLOOR CLEANOUT SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN NEAR
 THE WATER CLOSET IS NOT SHOWN ON THE RISER DIAGRAM.
 ALSO SHOW THE WASTE ARMS FOR THE DRINKING FOUNTAINS.
 SECTION 106.1.1.
  
 8. SHT P-4.2.0 DETAILS 1 THRU 7. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE
 FITTINGS/DEVICES AT THE TOP OF THE DROPS. THEY ARE NOT
 SHOWN ON THE PLUMBING LEGEND ON SHT P-0.1.1. IF THEY
 ARE AIR CHAMBERS, PLEASE DELETE AS THEY ARE NOT
 APPROVED. SECTION 604.9. IF THEY ARE WATER HAMMER
 ARRESTORS, THEY SHALL BE LOCATED NEAR THE FIXTURES IN
 AN "EFFECTIVE RANGE", NOT IN THE CEILING AS SHOWN.
 PDI-WH 201 AND MANUF. INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS.
  
 9. AN RPZV BACKFLOW IS REQUIRED ON THE WATER SERVICE TO
 THE BUILDING. SECTION 608.13.2.
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE
 THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY
 PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER
 LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER,
 WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING
 THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION
 PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND
 WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE
 ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE
 ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE
 COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED.
 THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION.
  
 REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS
 (561) 805-6721
 FAX (561) 805-6731
 E-MAIL [email protected]

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 6 Status P Date 2009-09-29 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2009-09-29 Time 15:23 Rev Time 0.75
Received By eschneid Date 2009-09-29 Time 15:23 Sent To B
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 2009-09-17 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2009-09-17 Time 18:44 Rev Time 0.75
Received By eschneid Date 2009-09-17 Time 18:44 Sent To  
Notes
2009-09-17 18:45:52PASSED
  
 USE PAVING PLAN AND SHEET A-1.1.1 FOR EASTERNMOST
 INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLAND WIDTH.

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 2008-12-10 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 2008-12-10 Time 11:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 2008-12-10 Time 11:39 Sent To  
Notes
2008-12-10 11:47:21PASSED
  
 NOTE: PRIOR TO ZONING DIVISION SIGN OFF FOR THE C.O., A
 MINOR AMENDMENT IS REQUIRED THAT INCLUDES THE AS-BUILT
 SET OF ELEVATIONS AS THESE HAVE CHANGED (AND MAY CHANGE
 AGAIN) SINCE THE PREVIOUS MINOR AMENDMENT.
  
 CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1435.

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 2008-11-03 Cont ID  
Sent By bpowell Date 2008-11-03 Time 12:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By bpowell Date 2008-11-03 Time 12:06 Sent To  
Notes
2008-11-03 12:33:011. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS ARE INCONSISTENT WITH THE PLAN
 THAT WAS SUBMITTED FOR THE MINOR AMENDMENT PROCESS. THE
 PLAN THAT ARE APPROVED HAVE A REVISION DATE OF 5-20-08.
  
 2. REPEAT COMMENT: THE YELLOW TABEBUIA TREES SHALL BE
 CHANGED TO ANTOHER TREE SPECIES BECAUSE IT IS KNOWN TO
 HAVE A VERY WEAK ROOT SYSTEM. THE YELLOW TABEBUIA TRESS
 TEND TO BLOW OVER IN ANY WIND STORM.
  
 3. REPEAT COMMENT: THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE
 COMPLETELY FUNCTIONAL AND PROVIDE 100 PERCENT COVERATE
 TO ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS INCLUDING RIGHT OF WAY. SOD AND
 IRRIGATION SHALL EXTEND TO THE NORTHEAST TIP OF THE
 SITE.
  
 4. REPEAT COMMENT: PLEASE PAY PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO
 THE LANDSCAPING AT THE ENTRANCE AND IN THE CORNERS OF
 THE SITE. THE LANDSCAPING NEEDS TO BE UPGRADED IN THESE
 AREAS, EXTEND TO THE NORTHEAST TIP OF THE SITE.
  
 5. REPEAT COMMENT: PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443(C)(3)(A),
 EACH TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND SHALL CONTAIN AT LEAST
 ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE. A TREE IS REQUIRED IN THE
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND THAT TERMINATES THE PRAKING ROW ALONG
 THE EAST PERIMETER OF THE SITE AT THE SOUTH END.
  
 6. THE BUILDING THAT IS SHOWN AS PROPOSED ON THE
 PAVEMENT AND DRAINAGE PLAN ALREADY EXIST ON OTHER PLANS
 WITHIN THE PACKET.
  
 FOR QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS PLEASE CONTACT: BOBBY POWELL
 JR., PLANNER, (561) 822-1401.

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 2008-05-22 Cont ID  
Sent By bpowell Date 2008-05-22 Time 10:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By bpowell Date 2008-05-22 Time 10:50 Sent To  
Notes
2008-05-22 10:52:151. SUBMIT A REVISED TREE ALTERATION APPLICATION WITH
 TWO (2) COPIES OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.ADDITIONAL TREES
 WILL NEED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED, BASED UPON
 OBSERVATIONS MADE DURING THE MOST RECENT SITE VISIT.
 THE SPACING BETWEEN TREES AROUND THE ENTIRE PERIMETER
 OF THE SITE SHALL NOT EXCEED 30 FEET.THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN SHALL SHOW THE FINAL LOCATION OF ALL TREES, SHRUBS
 AND GROUND COVER.
  
 2. THERE ARE CONFLICTS BETWEEN UTILITIES AND PROPOSED
 TREES.UTILITIES SHALL BE KEPT OUT OF THE ISLANDS AND
 STREET LIGHTS SHALL BE CENTERED BETWEEN PROPOSED TREES.
  
  
 3. THE PROPOSED YELLOW TABEBUIA TREES SHALL BE CHANGED
 TO ANOTHER TREE SPECIES BECAUSE THIS TREE SPECIES IS
 KNOWN TO HAVE A VERY WEAK ROOT SYSTEM. YELLOW TABEBUIA
 TREES TEND TO BLOW OVER IN ANY WIND STORM.
  
 4. PLEASE PAY PARTICULAR ATTENTION TO THE LANDSCAPING
 AT THE ENTRANCE AND IN THE CORNERS OF THE SITE.THE
 LANDSCAPING NEEDS TO BE UPGRADED IN THESE AREAS.THE
 PALM GROUPINGS SHALL BE UNDER PLANTED WITH SHRUBS AND
 GROUND COVER.
  
 5. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE COMPLETELY FUNCTIONAL
 AND PROVIDE 100% COVERAGE TO ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS,
 INCLUDING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.SOD AND IRRIGATION SHALL
 EXTEND TO THE NORTHEAST TIP OF THE SITE.
  
 6. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443(C)(3)(A), EACH TERMINAL
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND SHALL CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR
 FLOWERING TREE.A TREE IS REQUIRED IN THE LANDSCAPE
 ISLAND THAT TERMINATES THE PARKING ROW ALONG THE EAST
 PERIMETER OF THE SITE AT THE SOUTH END.
  
 FOR QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS PLEASE CONTACT: BOBBY POWELL
 JR., PLANNER, (561) 822-1401.

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 2007-12-12 Cont ID  
Sent By bpowell Date 2007-12-12 Time 19:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By bpowell Date 2007-12-12 Time 19:36 Sent To  
Notes
2007-12-12 19:33:061. THE MINOR AMENDMENT WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE APPROVED
 PRIOR TO PERMITTING.
  
 2. PLEASE INCLUDE A PARKING COUNT FOR EACH ROW OF
 PARKING ON THE SITE PLAN.
  
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE THE INDIVIDUAL SQUARE FOOTAGES OF ALL
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED BUILDINGS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN
 DRAWING.
  
 4. PLEASE PROVIDE A DIMENSION LINE FOR THE WIDTH OF ALL
 DRIVE AISLES.
  
 5. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE A TABULATION
 CLEARLY DISPLAYING THE GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE, GROSS OPEN
 SPACE, SQUARE FOOTAGE OF PAVED AND LANDSCAPED AREAS,
 AND ANY OTHERAPPROPRIATE INFORMATION, PER SECTION
 94-448(2)(G).
  
 6. INTERIOR LANDSCAPE ISLANDS SHALL BE AT LEAST FIVE
 (5) FEET WIDE AND CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR
 FLOWERING TREE, PER SECTION 94-443(3)(B).THERE IS A
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND IN THE CENTER OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING
 SITE THAT DOES NOT HAVE A SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE.
  
 7. ALL PARKING SPACES SHALL BE DOUBLE STRIPPED.THE
 STRIPPING SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE PARKING DETAIL PER
 SECTION 84-485 (FIGURE G) OF THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
  
 8. THE NORTH EASTERN MOST PARKING SPACE SHALL HAVE A
 MINIMUM OF 3 FEET OF PULL OUT AREA ON THE EAST TO ALLOW
 ENOUGH ROOM FOR MANEUVERING WHEN BACKING OUT.
  
 9. ALL DISABLED SPACES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 12 FEET IN
 WIDTH, AND HAVE ACCESS TO A CURB RAMP OR CURB CUT, WHEN
 NECESSARY, TO ALLOW ENTRANCE INTO THE BUILDING SERVED,
 PER SECTION 94-485(O)(2)(A).THIS DOES NOT HAPPEN ON
 THE TWO (2) DISABLED PARKING SPACES LOCATED JUST SOUTH
 OF THE NEW SANCTUARY.
  
 10. A HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM
 THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK.
  
 11. IS THERE A PURPOSE FOR A SIDEWALK LEADING DIRECTLY
 FROM THE CHURCH TO THE MIDDLE OF AN ACCESS DRIVE?
 ADDITIONALLY, THAT SIDEWALK IS NOT SHOWN ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 12. AT LEAST ONE BICYCLE SPACE IS REQUIRED PER EVERY 20
 REQUIRED AUTOMOBILE PARKING SPACES OR PORTION THEREOF,
 PER SECTION 94-485(Q)(1).
  
 13. WHEN THIS PROJECT IS RESUBMITTED FOR A THIRD PHASE
 THE TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE CAN NOT EXCEED 71,325 OR A
 MAJOR AMENDMENT WILL BE REQUIRED.
  
 14. THE TOTAL APPROVED PAVED PARKING IS 449 SPACES,
 THIS SITE PLAN INCLUDES PARKING FOR A THIRD PHASE,
 WHICH EXCEEDS THE NUMBER OF PAVED PARKING SPACES
 ORIGINALLY APPROVED.
  
 FOR MORE INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT: BOBBY POWELL JR.,
 PLANNER, (561) 822-1435


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved