 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 07090764
Plan Review Stops For Permit 07090764 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
13 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-12-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-12-03 |
Time |
08:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-12-03 |
Time |
08:31 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2008-12-03 08:32:03 | REVISION, T1, A1.1,A6.1 DATED 11/21/08 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
12 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-09-26 |
Time |
08:58 |
Rev Time |
1.22 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-09-26 |
Time |
08:58 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2008-09-26 09:01:16 | SUBMITTAL: SHOP DRAWINGS FOR SPIRAL STAIR CASE AND | | GAURD RAIL/ HANDRAIL AND | | GAURD RAIL/ HANDRAIL SYSTEM TO STAIRS TO ROOF LEVEL. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
11 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-09-22 |
Time |
16:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-09-22 |
Time |
16:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-09-22 16:23:22 | REVISION,INGERSOLL RAND NOA AND SHEETS T1, A8.1 DATED | | 9/9/8 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
10 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-09-22 |
Time |
14:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-09-22 |
Time |
14:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-09-22 14:48:10 | REVISION DATED 9/17/8 | | SHEETS T1, LS0.0, LS0, LS1, LS2, A1.1, A3.1, A5-0.1, | | A5-0.2, A5-1.1, A5-1.2, A6.1 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-09-22 |
Time |
10:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-09-22 |
Time |
10:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-09-22 10:01:48 | REVISION DATED 9/2/8, SHEETS T1, LS1, LS2 | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-08-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-08-11 |
Time |
13:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-08-11 |
Time |
13:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-08-11 13:42:17 | ROOF REVISION |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-07-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-07-10 |
Time |
17:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-07-10 |
Time |
17:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-07-10 17:21:41 | REVISION #5, SHEETS T1, LS1, LS3, A1.1, A3.1, A6.1, | | A8.1, ID2-1.1 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-06-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-06-05 |
Time |
12:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-06-05 |
Time |
12:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-06-05 12:16:01 | ****BUILDING PROVISOS**** | | | | 1-2.ADDRESSED | | | | 3.PROVIDE FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR | | INGERSOLL-RAND REPORT S07-001 (29A) | | | | 4-5. ADDRESSED. | | | | 6.SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR DOORS IN ZONE 5. | | | | | | | | | | REVISION OK DATED 5/13/08 | | SHEETS T1, LS.1, LS.3, LS1-D.3, A1.1, A2.1, A3.1, A3.2, | | A4.1, A5-1.1, A5-3.1, A5-D.2, A6.1, A7.1, A7.2, A8.1, | | A9.1, A9.2, A9.3, ID2-1.1, |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-04-14 |
Time |
16:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-04-14 |
Time |
16:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-14 16:06:48 | ****BUILDING PROVISOS**** | | | | 1.PROVIDE PRECAST FASTENING (ITEM 23B) | | | | 2.PROVIDE METHOD OF ATTACHMENT PRECAST PILASTER (ITEM | | 26) | | | | 3.APPLY FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL, INGERSOLL RAND | | REPORT S07-001 (29A) | | | | 4.REVISE FIRE RESISTIVE DESIGN SHEETS (LS1-D1 THROUGH | | 3) TO INCLUDE UL U905 AND UL U926. | | | | 5.REVISE DETAIL C4 A5-D.1 TO INCLUDE UL ASSEMBLY OR | | CALCULATED FIRE RESISTANCE. | | | | 6.SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR DOORS IN ZONE 5. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-04-03 |
Time |
18:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-04-03 |
Time |
18:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-03 18:47:35 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | CODE | | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL | | FBC* CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | FSFLORIDA STATUTE | | | | 1.SEE ELECTRICAL AND MECHANICAL COMMENTS REGARDING | | ENERGY CALCS.CODE COMPLIANT ENERGY CALCS ARE REQUIRED | | PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE AND CANNOT BE PROVISO'D AS | | FLORIDA STATUTORY ITEMS CANNOT BE PROVISO ITEMS. | | | | 2.SEE THE SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCS.NO DOORS ARE | | SHOWN.TWO WINDOWS ARE SHOWN, BUT THE PLAN SHOWS MORE | | THAN TWO WINDOWS.THE DESCRIPTION STATES THAT THE | | DESCRIPTION IS "CLEMATIS GARAGE - ELECTRIC" BUT THE | | ENERGY CALC NEEDS TO SHOW ALL BUILDING COMPONENTS AS | | REQUIRED. | | | | 3.OWNER/AGENT IS TO SIGN THE ENERGY CALCS PRIOR TO | | SUBMITTAL, FBC13-103.1. | | | | 4.SEE ENERGY CALC PAGE WITH "OTHER REQUIRED | | COMPLIANCE" TITLE, SHEET 7.PLEASE COMPLETE. | | | | 5.NOTHING IS SHOWN IN THE COMPONENT "FLOORS", PAGE 5 | | OF THE ENERGY CALC, BUT CONFERENCE ROOM AND OFFICES | | HAVE A FLOOR OVER UNCONDITIONED SPACE. | | | | 6.THIS IS NOT AN EXHAUSTIVE LIST AS ENERGY CALCS ARE | | SPOT CHECKED FOR COMPLIANCE.PLEASE CHECK ALL | | COMPONENTS AND CONFIRM THAT INSULATION ON THE ENERGY | | CALC MATCHES INSULATION ON THE PLAN. | | | | PURSUANT TO CONTRACTOR'S REQUEST, THE PERMIT WILL BE | | ISSUED WITH THE FOLLOWING PROVISOS: | | | | 1.PROVIDE PRECAST FASTENING (ITEM 23B) | | | | 2.PROVIDE METHOD OF ATTACHMENT PRECAST PILASTER (ITEM | | 26) | | | | 3.APPLY FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL, INGERSOLL RAND | | REPORT S07-001 (29A) | | | | 4.REVISE FIRE RESISTIVE DESIGN SHEETS (LS1-D1 THROUGH | | 3) TO INCLUDE UL U905 AND UL U926. | | | | 5.REVISE DETAIL C4 A5-D.1 TO INCLUDE UL ASSEMBLY OR | | CALCULATED FIRE RESISTANCE. | | | | 6.SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR DOORS IN ZONE 5. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-02-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-02-26 |
Time |
17:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-02-25 |
Time |
12:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-02-26 17:57:51 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | SAMANTHA HILL, BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | 561-805-6724 [email protected] | | | | FBCFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 | | FBC EBFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING | | CODE | | FBC RFLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2004 RESIDENTIAL FBC* | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS TO THE FBC2004 | | | | FAC FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | FSFLORIDA STATUTE | | | | | | | | 1A. ---VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION | | AND REMOVE AND REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY.A | | TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT | | NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE | | CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILLH HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR | | PERMIT.THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | 1B. COMMENT ADDRESSED; 3 SETS SUBMITTED.FBC*106.1.1 | | | | 1C. SEE PREVIOUS LISTS REGARDING PLANS TO BE SPECIFIC | | TO TECHNICAL CODES.THE CODE SHALL NOT BE CITED AS A | | WHOLE OR IN PART.SEE SHEET A5-D.1; AN INCOMPLETE CODE | | REFERENCE NUMBER WAS USED.PLEASE SEE OTHER COMMENTS | | AND REVISE AS NECESSARY TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | | 4-5, 23B, 26. PROVISO ITEMS. | | | | 27.3RD REQUEST, PLEASE PROVIDE EITHER A LETTER FROM | | THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER THAT THE FASTENERS FOR THE | | OLDER NOAS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND CONFIRMED THAT 1/3 | | STRESS INCREASE WAS NOT TAKEN.THE RESPONSE STATES | | THAT ?ALL NOAS SUBMITTED ARE BASED ON THE 2004 FBC NOT | | 2001.HOWEVER, SEE FL1589 WHICH WAS SUBMITTED FOR | | INGERSOLL RAND DOOR.THIS PRODUCT APPROVAL IS BASED ON | | FBC2001, NOT FBC2004.FLORIDA STATE OR LOCAL PRODUCT | | APPROVAL IS REQUIRED FAC9B72.A LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL | | CANNOT BE ISSUED BECAUSE COMPLIANCE WITH FBC2004 HAS | | NOT BEEN SHOWN.PLEASE PROVIDE THE LETTER AS | | PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED.OTHER NOAS SUBMITTED WERE ISSUED | | PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION OF FBC2004; PLEASE CONFIRM THAT | | THE STRESS INCREASE WAS NOT TAKEN AND, IF IT WAS, THAT | | ANCHORING IS NOT AFFECTED. | | | | 29A.S07-001 IS NOTED IN THE PREVIOUS CORRECTION LIST, | | THE RESPONSE LETTER, AND SHEET A8.1, BUT I WAS UNABLE | | TO LOCATE THIS PAPERWORK IN THE SUBMITTAL.PLEASE | | ADDRESS. | | | | 30.THE PREVIOUS REVIEW REQUESTED PRODUCT APPROVAL | | INFORMATION AND CLARIFICATION.PLEASE NOTE THAT, IF A | | SCHEDULE OF OPENINGS WITH DESIGN PRESSURE FOR EACH | | OPENING IS NOT SUBMITTED, THE PRODUCTS ARE TO COMPLY | | WITH THE MOST STRINGENT PRESSURE ON THE CHART S0-3.0 | | WHICH IS +66/-71PSF FOR ZONE 4, +66/-88PSF FOR ZONE 5. | | NOTE THE FOLLOWING: | | | | A.NOA 03 0611.04, +-60PSF LIMITATION, BUT THE DOORS | | ARE LOCATED IN ZONE 5 WITH A +66/-88PSF DP REQUIREMENT | | SHEET S0 3.0. | | | | B.NOA 02 0712.03, SEE ITEM 27.THIS PRODUCT HAS A DP | | OF +-70; APPEARS TO BE OK BASED ON INTERPOLATION. | | | | C.THE STAIRWELL DOORS ARE TO BE FIRE RATED AND ALSO | | MEET DESIGN PRESSURE REQUIREMENTS OF ZONE 5 +66/-88. AS | | THE PAPERWORK S07 001R1 IS NOT IN THE PACKAGE, CODE | | COMPLIANCE CANNOT BE DETERMINED. | | | | D.NOA 03 0327.02 OK FOR ZONE 4, 05 0624.03 OK, 05 | | 0624.04 OK, 05 0624.06 OK, 07 0416.02 OK, 05 1005.02 | | OK | | | | E.PREPARED BY AN ENGINEER AND SUBMITTED FOR PUBLIC | | RECORD ARE TO BE SIGNED, SEALED, DATED ORIGINALS FS471. | | PROVIDE ORIGINALS FOR THE OPEN LATTICE WINDLOADS. | | ENGINEER FOR THE OPEN LATTICE IS TO USE ASCE7-02, | | FBC35.ASCE7-02 HAS NOT BEEN ADOPTED BY FBC. | | | | 31.PREVIOUS LIST HAD REQUESTED CLARIFICATION AND/OR | | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE WALL LOUVERS.SHEET A8.2 | | SPECIFIES A NOA WHICH WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE NOA | | SUBMITTAL BOOK.PLEASE PROVIDE. | | | | 33B.COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS LIST; CODE SUMMARY; PLEASE | | PROVIDE WHAT TYPE OF OCCUPANCY. SEE FBC302.1, | | STRUCTURES OR PORTIONS OF STRUCTURES TO BE CLASSIFIED. | | SHEET LS0.0, BUSINESS, MERCANTILE, AND S2 DECLARED, BUT | | ON LS0 FACTORY INDUSTRIAL AND SPECIAL PURPOSE | | INDUSTRIAL AREAS DECLARED.PLEASE RESOLVE | | INCONSISTENCIES. | | | | 33C. COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS LIST, SHEET LS.1, LS.2 S2 IS | | SHOWN AS INCIDENTAL BUT THIS IS NOT INCIDENTAL USE. THE | | ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER INDICATES THAT ALL | | REFERENCES TO INCIDENTAL HAVE BEEN REMOVED, SO | | APPARENTLY ARCHITECT IS IN AGREEMENT.PLEASE REMOVE | | REMAINING INCIDENTAL REFERENCES. PLEASE CHECK ALL | | SHEETS AS OTHER SHEETS MAY BE AFFECTED. | | | | 34A. WALL TYPE IDENTIFIERS ADDED.SHEET A6.1, FIRST | | FLOOR ENLARGED PLAN SOUTH, WALL TYPE IDENTIFIER BETWEEN | | RETAIL 1.102 AND FPL VAULT 1.103 SHOWS A 3 HOUR WALL | | FOR W2.1-8 AND A 2 HOUR REQUIREMENT BETWEEN RETAIL | | 1.102 AND PARKING GARAGE.THE DETAIL FOR W2.1 DOES NOT | | SHOW A FIRE RESISTIVE RATING AND STATES REF FBC 721.2 | | WHEN RATED, SHEET A5-D.1.SEE COMMENT 1C, DETAILS AND | | PLANS MUST BE SPECIFIC, CANNOT REFER TO CODE SECTIONS | | TO SHOW CODE COMPLIANCE.ALSO THIS IS NOT THE CORRECT | | CODE REFERENCE.AS THERE ARE TABLES AND UL ASSEMBLY | | DETAILS IN SHEETS LS1-D.1 THROUGH 3, YOU MAY REFER TO | | THE SPECIFIC ASSEMBLY OR PLAN PAGE RATHER THAN AN | | INCORRECT/INCOMPLETE CODE REFERENCE. | | | | 34B. THE COMMENT REGARDING OPENING PROTECTIVES WAS | | ADDRESSED BY SHOWING WINDOW W6 AT THE WAITING ROOM AS | | 90 MINUTE ON SHEET A8.2.THE IMPACT WINDOW IS NOT | | AVAILABLE AS A FIRE RATED WINDOW.IF YOU FEEL THIS | | COMMENT IS IN ERROR, PLEASE PROVIDE SPEC SHEETS FROM | | THE MANUFACTURER SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH FIRE RESISTIVE | | RATING REQUIREMENT. | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | | 37.SEE LS0.0, CODE SUMMARY, FIRE RESISTANT RATINGS OR | | SEPARATIONS.IT STATES THAT EVERY EXTERIOR WALL WITH | | 15FT OF A PROPERTY LINE . . . AS REQUIRED BY TABLE 602. | | NOTE THAT OPENING PROTECTION IS REQUIRED BY FBC TABLE | | 704.8, SEE ALSO COMMENT 1C.SEE FBC TABLE 704.8, 25% | | UNPROTECTED OPENINGS ALLOWED AS MODIFIED BY FBC704.8.1. | | IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO EXCEED CODE COMPLIANCE, BUT PLEASE | | CLARIFY DESIGN INTENT AS FIRE RESISTIVE RATINGS ARE NOT | | SHOWN FOR THE EAST ELEVATION. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-01-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-01-16 |
Time |
07:33 |
Rev Time |
5.55 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-01-16 |
Time |
07:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-01-16 07:35:28 | 500 BANYAN BLVD | | CITY PARKING GARAGE | | JAN.08, 2008 | | | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 07090764 | | ADD: 500 BANYAN BLVD | | CONT: CATALFUMO | | TEL: (561)307-4746 | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | 2NDREVIEW | | ACTION: DENIEDWPB AMENDMENT 105.13.6. W.P.B. | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR THRESHOLD | | BUILDINGS A SPECIAL INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY FL S S | | 553.79(5) FLORIDA STATUTES TO THE MINIMUM INSPECTIONS | | REQUIRED BY THIS CODE. CONTACT HAROLD PISKURA MANAGER | | OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR PROGRAM AT (561)805-6711 FOR | | FURTHER INFORMATION BEFORE THE PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED. | | | | 1A)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & | | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH | | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE | | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE | | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR | | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | 1B)PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, PLANS, REPORTS, | | REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR SUBMITTALS FOR | | REVIEW FOR PERMIT. IF YOUR PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A | | RESIDENT INSPECTOR OR IF YOUR PROJECT IS A THRESHOLD | | BUILDING REQUIRING A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN (3) THREE | | SETS OF ALL SAID DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PERMIT | | ISSUANCE. 106.1* /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTSWEST PALM | | BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | | 1C) 106.1.1* W.P.B. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE/2004 | | DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN | | THE FORM OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF | | MATERIALS, WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY | | WITH THE TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE | | SPECIFIC TO THE TECHNICAL CODES "SHALL NOT BE CITED AS | | A WHOLE OR IN PART, NOR THE TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS | | EQUIVALENT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC | | INFORMATION". CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE | | SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND | | EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT | | WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND | | RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS | | DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | | 1D) COMPLIED. | | | | 1E) COMPLIED. | | | | 2-3) COMPLIED. | | | | 4-5) BUILDING PROVISOS. | | | | 2-22) COMPLIED. | | | | 23) 2ND REQUEST,SHEET A2.1 DETAIL# 02 PLEASE PROVIDE | | WHAT TYPE OF MATERIAL THE ARCHITECTURAL TRIM WILL BE | | MADE FROM? 1406.2.2 PLANS INDICATE A PRECAST MOLDING | | WHAT TYPE? | | | | 23B) THE PLANS INDICATE THAT THE FASTENING SCHEDULE | | WILL BE SUPPLIED BY A SPECIALTY ENGINEER, WITH SHOP | | DRAWINGS THIS CAN BE A PROVISO ONCE REVIEWED BY THE | | DESIGNER OF RECORD. | | | | 24) COMPLIED. | | | | 25) 2ND REQUEST, SHEET A3.2 PROVIDE THE WIND LOAD | | INFORMATION (CALCULATIONS) FOR THE ROOF TOP LIGHT | | POLES. ASCE 7-02. RESPONSE INDICATES LOCATION TO BE IN | | THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOLDER, THERE IS A HIGHLIGHTED TAB | | BUT NO DOCUMENTATION. | | | | 26) PROVISO: SHOP DRAWINGS. | | | | 27) 2ND REQUEST,PLEASE PROVIDE EITHER A LETTER FROM | | THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER THAT THE FASTENERS FOR THE | | OLDER NOA?S HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND NO 1 1/3RD INCREASE | | WAS TAKEN FOR THE STEEL FASTENERS. | | | | WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT | | WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED | | AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR | | TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL.ALL OF | | THE PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE STAMPED WITH | | THORTON-TOMASETTIS' SHOP DRAWING STAMP THAT THEY WERE | | REVIEWED. THE ISSUE THAT IS NOT COMMONLY KNOWN THAT THE | | OLDER MIAMI-DADE | | NOA'S THAT WERE TESTED BEFORE THE 2004 FBC MAY OR MAY | | NOT MEET THE CURRENT 2004 FBC. 1605.3.1.1 LOAD | | REDUCTIONS. BEFORE THE 2004 FBC THE MANUFACTURERS WERE | | ALLOWED TO TAKE | | 1.33 STEEL INCREASES AND DID SO WITH THERE FASTENERS. | | THE NEWER MIAMI-DADE REPORTS AND THE OLDER REPORTS THAT | | ARE BEING UPDATED ARE BEING REVIEWED FOR THE ANCHOR | | CONNECTIONS. THE | | STATEMENTIS SHOWN UNDER C CALCULATION, REVISED | | ANCHOR CALCULATIONS THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED UNDER THE | | 2004 FBC WILL STATE THE ANCHOR CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN | | REVIEWED TO THE 2004 FBC. | | PLEASE REVIEW THE INGERSOLL- RAND AND THE TRAINER GLASS | | FOR THE ANCHOR CONNECTIONS MEETING 1605.3.1.1/ 2004 | | FBC. THIS MAY AFFECT THE PRESSURES LISTED IN THE | | REPORT. | | | | 28) COMPLIED. | | | | 29A)THE EVALUATION REPORT FROM INGERSOLL-RAND REPORT# | | S07-001 IS A COPY AND NEEDS TO BE AN ORIGINAL (3) FOR | | THRESHOLD BUILDING) SIGNED AND SEALED REPORTS. | | 29B) THIS REPORT INDICATES UNDER PRODUCT COMPARISON TO | | BE A IN SWING DOOR WHERE AS UNDER EVALUATION FOR A | | POSITIVE WIND APPLICATION THE WIND LOAD APPLIED TO THE | | DOOR PANEL WOULD BE DISTRIBUTED AROUND THE FRAME | | EQUALLY, THIS WOULD REQUIRE THE DOOR & FRAME TO BE | | INSTALLED IN A OUT SWING INSTALLATION. PLEASE CORRECT | | STATEMENTS. | | 29C) PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS INDICATING THE | | EXTRAPOLATION OF PRESSURES OR INTERPOLATION OF | | PRESSURES, DEPENDING ON REPORT. | | 29D) IT APPEARS THAT A LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL WILL BE | | REQUIRED, PLEASE FILL OUT FORM FOR A LOCAL PRODUCT | | APPROVAL FOR WEST PALM BEACH, SEE FORM ATTACHED. | | | | 30) EXTERIOR DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED DOES NOT | | TIE TO THE DOOR SCHEDULE FOUND ON | | SHEET A8.1, PLEASE PROVIDE THE FL NUMBER AS IN THE | | WINDOW SCHEDULE FOUND ON A8.2, | | OTHERWISE THE LOCATIONS CAN NOT BE LOCATED. 106.1.2 | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED. | | | | 31) 2ND REQUEST, SHEET A-8.02 WINDOW 12& 13 BOTH | | INDICATE WALL LOUVERS WITH A SPECIFIC NOA 05-0208.01 | | NCA MANUFACTURING, THIS IS A DISCREPANCY FROM THE NOA | | SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD, WHICH | | CAN BE USED ? | | | | 32) COMPLIED. | | | | NEW COMMENTS: | | | | 33) PLEASE CORRECT,LS0.0 CODE SUMMARY: | | 33A)CODE SUMMARY INDICATES A ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE | | WHERE-AS LS 1 & LS 2 ON EACH LEVEL INDICATE THAT THE | | DESIGN IS AN OPEN PARKING STRUCTURE, PLEASE CORRECT. IF | | OPEN PARKING GARAGE IS TO BE CONSIDERED PROVIDE | | CALCULATION FOR OPENNESS 406.3.3.1. | | | | 33B) CODE SUMMARY PLEASE PROVIDE WHAT TYPE OF OCCUPANCY | | THIS BUILDING WILL BE USED FOR, PLEASE SEE 406.2.7 FOR | | MIXED SEPARATION. | | | | 33C) LS.1 PLEASE CORRECT THE DESIGNATION OF THE PARKING | | AREA FROM BEING AN INCIDENTAL USE | | TO S-2. TABLE 302.1.1 INDICATE ALLOWABLE AREAS FOR | | INCIDENTAL USE AREAS. | | | | 34A) 406.2.7 PARKING GARAGES- MIXED USE, PARKING | | GARAGES SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM OTHER OCCUPANCIES IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 302.3.2. | | 302.3.2 SEPARATED USES. | | EACH PORTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE INDIVIDUALLY | | CLASSIFIED AS TO USE AND SHALL BE COMPLETELY SEPARATED | | FROM ADJACENT AREAS BY FIRE BARRIER WALLS OR HORIZONTAL | | ASSEMBLIES OR BOTH HAVING A FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING | | DETERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH TABLE 302.3.2 FOR USES | | BEING SEPARATED. PLEASE SEE TABLE 302.3.2 THAT REQUIRES | | A 2HR SEPARATION BETWEEN OCCUPANCIES. PLEASE PROVIDE | | WALL TAGS INDICATING TYPE OFFIRE RATED WALL. | | | | 34B) THIS SEPARATION WILL ALSO REQUIRE 1 ? HR OPENING | | PROTECTIVE ON DOOR NUMBER2-103A & 2-201B AS WELL AS THE | | WAITING ROOM WINDOW AND FIRST FLOOR DOOR NUMBER 1-010A. | | PLEASE SEE TABLE 715.3 & TABLE 715.4. | | | | 35) BUSINESS OCCUPANCY ON THE SECOND FLOOR LEVEL, THE | | CONFERENCE ROOM HAS A SECOND MEANS OF EGRESS WHICH | | LEAVES THIS OCCUPANCY AND DOES NOT INDICATE WHERE A | | DISCERNABLE PATH OF EGRESS TRAVEL TO AN EXIT EXIST. | | PLEASE PROVIDE A DISCERNABLE EGRESS PATH OF TRAVEL TO A | | VERTICAL EXIT ENCLOSURE. ALSO CONCERNS THAT CARS CAN | | SWING INTO THIS PATH OF TRAVEL PLEASE PROVIDE A BOLLARD | | SYSTEM OF PROTECTION AND DESIGNATION OF EGRESS PATH. | | PLEASE SEE 1013.2. | | | | 36) SHEETA8.2 INDICATES A WINDOW DESIGNATION W-8 AS | | WELL AS ON THE ELEVATIONS AND THE ROOF PLAN A2.1 BOTH | | INDICATE WHAT APPEARSTO BE A ROOF LINE THAT DOES NOT | | APPEAR ON SHEET S1-3.0, A DISCREPANCY THAT NEEDS | | CLARIFICATION. 106.1.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-10-21 |
Time |
14:04 |
Rev Time |
3.33 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-10-21 |
Time |
14:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-10-21 14:17:51 | 500 BANYAN BLVD | | CITY PARKING GARAGE | | OCT. 22/ 2007 | | | | | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 07090764 | | ADD: 500 BANYAN BLVD | | CONT: CATALFUMO | | TEL: (561)307-4746 | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | 1STREVIEW | | ACTION: DENIEDWPB AMENDMENT 105.13.6. W.P.B. | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | REQUEST FOR THRESHOLD BUILDINGS A | | SPECIAL INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY S. | | 553.79(5) FLORIDA STATUTES TO THE MIN- | | IMUM INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY THIS CODE. | | CONTACT HAROLD PISKURA MANAGER OF THE | | SPECIAL INSPECTOR PROGRAM AT (561) | | 805-6711 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION BEFORE | | THE PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED. | | | | 1A)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & | | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH | | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE | | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE | | FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR | | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | 1B)PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, PLANS, REPORTS, | | REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR SUBMITTALS FOR | | REVIEW FOR PERMIT. | | IF YOUR PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A RESIDENT INSPECTOR OR IF | | YOUR PROJECT IS A THRESHOLD BUILDING REQUIRING A | | THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN (3) THREE SETS OF ALL SAID | | DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. 106.1* | | /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTSWEST PALM BEACH | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | | 1C) 106.1.1* W.P.B. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE/2004 | | DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN | | THE FORM OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF | | MATERIALS, WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY | | WITH THE TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE | | SPECIFIC TO THE TECHNICAL CODES "SHALL NOT BE CITED AS | | A WHOLE OR IN PART, NOR THE TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS | | EQUIVALENT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC | | INFORMATION". CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE | | SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND | | EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT | | WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND | | RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS | | DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | | 1D) PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT (FIRST TIME REVIEW) | | AFTER JULY 1ST, 2007 SHALL BE REVIEWED TO THE 2004 FBC | | BUILDING WITH THE2007 REVISIONS, PLEASE SEE SHEET | | T-1& LS0.0 APPLICABLE CODES. | | | | 1E) PLEASE SEE SHEET T-1 UNDER APPLICABLE CODES (2)(E) | | UPDATE THE STANDARD ASCE 7-98,SEE SECTION 1609.1.1 & | | CHAPTER 35 REFRENECE STANDARDS. | | | | 2) NOTE, IMPACT FEE STAMP AND RADON FEES WERE PAID | | UNDER FOUNDATION PERMIT # 07070220. | | | | 3)WPB AMENDMENT 105.13.6. W.P.B. CONSTRUCTION | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR THRESHOLD BUILDINGS A | | SPECIAL INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY FL S S. 553.79(5) | | FLORIDA STATUTES TO THE MINIMUM INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY | | THIS CODE. CONTACT HAROLD PISKURA MANAGER OF THE | | SPECIAL INSPECTOR PROGRAM AT (561) 805-6711 FOR FURTHER | | INFORMATION BEFORE THE PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED. ALTHOUGH | | THERE IS A ON GOING FOUNDATION PERMIT, A SECOND | | AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED SINCE THESE ARE STAND ALONE | | PERMITS. | | | | 4) NOTEICE TO CONTRACTOR:109.3.10* IMPACT OF | | CONSTRUCTION. ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REGULATED BY | | THIS CODE SHALL BE PERFORMED IN A MANNER SO AS NOT TO | | ADVERSELY IMPACT THE CONDITION OF ADJACENT PROPERTY, | | UNLESS SUCH ACTIVITY IS PERMITTED TO AFFECT SAID | | PROPERTY PURSUANT TO A CONSENT BY THE APPLICABLE | | PROPERTY OWNER, UNDER TERMS & CONDITIONS AGREEABLE TO | | THE APPLICABLE PROPERTY OWNER. THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT | | LIMITED TO THE CONTROL OF DUST, NOISE, WATER OR | | DRAINAGE RUN-OFF, DEBRIS, AND THE STORAGE OF | | CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS. NEW CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL | | NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT HISTORIC SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE | | FLOWS SERVING ADJACENT PROPERTIES, & MAY REQUIRE | | SPECIAL DRAINAGE DESIGN COMPLYING WITH ENGINEERING | | STANDARDS TO PRESERVE THE | | POSITIVE PATTERNS OF THE AFFECTED SITES. ACCORDINGLY, | | DEVELOPERS, CONTRACTORS, AND OWNERS OF ALL NEW | | RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING ADDITIONS, POOLS, | | PATIOS, DRIVEWAYS, DECKS, OR SIMILAR ITEMS, ON EXISTING | | PROPERTIES RESULTING IN A DECREASE IN EXCESS OF 800SQ | | FT OF PERMEABLE LAND AREA ON ANY PARCEL SHALL AS A | | PERMIT CONDITION, PROVIDE A PROFESSIONALLY PREPARED | | DRAINAGE PLAN CLEARLY INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH THIS | | PARAGRAPH. UPON COMPLETION OF THE IMPROVEMENT, A | | CERTIFICATION FROM A LICENSED ENGINEER SHALL BE | | SUBMITTED TO THE INSPECTOR IN ORDER TO RECEIVE APPROVAL | | OF THE FINAL INSPECTION. | | | | 5) 109.3.10.1 HURRICANE PROTECTION. IT SHALL BE | | UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION RELATED | | MATERIALS EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS TO REMAIN LOOSE OR | | OTHERWISE UNSECURED AT A CONSTRUCTION SITE FROM 24 HRS. | | AFTER A HURRICANE WATCH HAS BEEN ISSUED UNTIL THE | | HURRICANE WATCH OR WARNING HAS BEEN LIFTED. ALL SUCH | | CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS,EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS SHALL BE | | EITHER REMOVED FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OR SECURED IN | | SUCH A MANNER AS TO MINIMIZE THE DANGER OF SUCH | | CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS CAUSING | | DAMAGE TO PERSONS OR PROPERTY FROM HIGH WINDS. ANY | | PERSONS WHO FAILS TO COMPLY TO REMOVE OR SECURE THE | | CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS EQUIPMENT AND DEBRIS WITHIN 24 | | HRS AFTER A HURRICANE WATCH HAS BEEN ISSUED SHALL BE | | SUBJECT TO A FINE NOT TO EXCEED $500.00.IN ADDITION | | TO THE ABOVE, A LICENSED CONTRACTOR WHO VIOLATES THIS | | SECTION SHALL BE SUBJECT TO DISCIPLINE PURSUANT TO | | SECTION 113 OF THIS CHAPTER. | | | | 6) PLEASE REVIEW ALL SHEETS ARCHITTECTAL AND | | ENGINEERING SHEETS FOR THE REQUIRED ADDRESSIN THE | | TITLEBLOCK. FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G15-23.002 & | | 61G1-16.004 , FBC 2004, | | 110.1.2 & 106.5. NOTE SHEET S1 HAS 401 CLEMATIS ST ON | | SHEET. | | | | 7) LS.1 VERSES A6.1 DETAIL# 01 THE RETAIL STORES 1.101 | | & 1.102 BOTH INDICATE A 2 HR RATED WALL BETWEEN THE | | PARKING GARAGE AND RETAIL AREAS, A6.1 DOES NOT HAVE ANY | | WALL TAGS IDENTIFYING TYPES OF WALLS NOR RATING. FBC | | 106.1.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED, TABLE 302.3.2 | | & 706.3.6 & 708.1. | | | | 8)LS.1 VERSES A6.1 DETAIL# 01 THE RETAIL STORES BOTH | | DO NOT INDICATE WALL RATINGS NOR WALL TAGS FOR THE | | TENANT SEPERATION WALLS BETWEEN THE TWO UNITS.FIRE | | PARTITIONS 708.1(5). | | | | 9)PLANS FAIL TO PROVIDE THE OCCUPANCY SEPERATION | | BETWEEN THE RETAIL AREAS AND THE S2 STORAGE OCCUPANCY | | ON THE 2ND FLOOR, 711.3 FIRE RESISTANCERATINGS, SHEET | | A5-0.2 INDICATES THE USE OF | | HOLLOW CORE SLAB FOR A RATED ASSEMBLY PLEASE SEE | | 721.2.2.1.1 FOR THE EQUIVALANT THICKNESS VALUE FOR TYPE | | OF SLABALSO SEE TABLE 721.2.2.1. | | | | 10) SHEET A5-D.1 INDICATES THE USE OF T-JOIST FLOOR | | SYSTEM PLEASE PROVIDE THE HOURLY FIRE RATING FOR SUCH | | FLOOR SYSTEM , 721.2.2.1.2 / TABLE 721.2.2.1. | | | | 11)LS.1 VERSES A6.1 DETAIL# 01 THE GENERATOR ROOM, | | LS.1 INDICATES A 2HR RATED WALL BETWEEN THE S2 STORAGE | | AND THE GENERATOR, SHEET A6.1 IT APPEARS THERE IS A | | LOUVER IN THIS WALL. | | SEE 702 FIRE DAMPERS, &716.3.1 FIRE PROTECTION | | RATING. FIRE DAMPERS SHALL HAVE THE MINIMUM FIRE | | PROTECTION RATING SPECIFIED IN TABLE 716.3.1 FOR THE | | TYPE OF PENETRATION. | | | | 12) LS.1 VERSES A6.1 DETAIL# 01 THE EMERGENCY POWER | | SUPPLY ROOM # 1.106. LS.1 INDICATES A TWO HOUR RATED | | WALL WHERE AS THE DOOR SCHEDULE ON A-8.1 DOES NOT SHOW | | ANY FIRE RATING AT ALL. | | PLEASE SEE SECTION 715.3 AND TABLE 715.3. | | | | 13) A6.1 DETAIL# 01 DOES NOT INDICATE WALL TAGS FOR THE | | 2 HR RATED WALL SEPERATING THE S2 OCCUPANCY FROM THE | | SEPERATED USE ROOMS GENERATOR, ELECTRIC ROOM , ETC, | | PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 106.1.2 & TABLE | | 715.3 REQUIRED WALL RATINGS, MAIN ELECTRIC ROOM NFPA | | 13:8.14.0, GENERATOR ROOM NFPA 110.7.2.2 & MAIN | | ELECTRIC ROOM NFPA 13.8.14.10. | | | | 14)A6.1 DETAIL# 01 STORAGE ROOM 1.108 PLEASE PLACE | | WALL IDENTIFICATION TAGS ON COMMON WALLS TO THE S2 | | ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE WALLS. PLANS APPEAR TO HAVE | | OPENINGS IN THE EAST END OF THE STORAGE ROOM WALL, ARE | | THEY ENCLOSED OR RATED? WHAT TYPE OF STORAGE IS THIS S1 | | OR S2? 106.1.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED.SECTION | | 302.1. | | | | 15) A6.1 DETAIL# 02 STORAGE ROOM 1.109 PLEASE INDICATE | | AS TO WHAT TYPE OF ITEMS ARE TO PLACED IN STORAGE | | CREATING EITHER A S1 OR S2 OCCUPANCY? SECTION302.1 . | | | | 16) A6.1 DETAIL# 03 THE ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOM # | | 2.003.1AND ROOM 2.005L DOESN'T INDICATE ANY WALL | | IDENTIFICATION TAGS NOR DOES THE DOOR SCHEDULE INDICATE | | A FIRE RATING ON DOOR# 2-003.1A SHEET A8.1. | | 3006.4 MACHINE ROOMS AND MACHINERY SPACES. ELEVATOR | | MACHINE ROOMS AND MACHINERY SPACES SHALL BE ENCLOSED | | WITH CONSTRUCTION HAVING A FIRE-RESISTANCE RATING NOT | | LESS THAN THE REQUIRED RATING OF THE HOISTWAY ENCLOSURE | | SERVED BY THE MACHINERY. | | | | 17) PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLIANCE WITH, 3002.4 ELEVATOR CAR | | TO ACCOMMODATE AMBULANCE STRETCHER . IN BUILDINGS FOUR | | STORIES IN HEIGHT OR MORE, AT LEAST ONE ELEVATOR SHALL | | BE PROVIDED FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT EMERGENCY ACCESS TO ALL | | FLOORS. SUCH ELEVATOR CAR SHALL BE OF SUCH A SIZE AND | | ARRANGEMENT TO ACCOMMODATE A 24-INCH BY 76-INCH (610 MM | | BY 1930 MM) AMBULANCE STRETCHER IN THE HORIZONTAL, OPEN | | POSITION AND SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY THE INTERNATIONAL | | SYMBOL FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES (STAR OF LIFE). | | THE SYMBOL SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 3 INCHES (76 MM) HIGH | | AND SHALL BE PLACED INSIDE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE | | HOISTWAY DOOR FRAME. | | | | 18)3003.6.1 VENTS. HOISTWAYS OF ELEVATORS SERVING | | MORE THAN 3 FLOORS SHALL BEPROVIDED WITH MEANS OF | | VENTING SMOKE AND HOT GASES TO THE OUTER AIR IN CASE OF | | FIRE. | | | | 19)3003.6.2 VENTS SHALL BE LOCATED BELOW THE FLOOR OR | | FLOORS AT THE TOP OF THE HOISTWAY, AND SHALL BE EITHER | | DIRECTLY TO THE OUTER AIR OR THROUGH NONCOMBUSTIBLE | | DUCTS TO THE OUTER AIR. | | | | 20) A6.1 DETAILS 02 AND 03 BOTH INDICATE THE VERTICAL | | EXIT ENCLOSURES AND ELEVATOR HOIST WAYS AGAIN THERE ARE | | NO WALL TYPE IDENTIFICATION TAGS INDICATING THESE WALLS | | ARE 2 HR RATED WALLS AND OF WHAT TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. | | THE LIFE SAFETY PLAN DOES IDENTIFY THEM AS TWO HR RATED | | BUT WHAT TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION. 707.4. | | | | 21) PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE SPIRAL STAIRWAY, | | RISERS, TREAD DEPTH, HEAD ROOM ETC, 1009.9.1. | | | | 22) DELETED.10-26-07 | | 23) SHEET A2.1 DETAIL# 02 PLEASE PROVIDE WHAT TYPE OF | | MATERIAL THE ARCHITECTURAL TRIM IS DEPICTED IN THIS | | PICTURE? AND HOW WILLIT BE ATTACHED TO THE STRUCTURE. | | 1406.2.2. | | | | 24)PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR CODE COMPLIANCE ON | | VAN ACCESSIBILITY AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH 11-4.6.3 VAN | | ACCESSIBLITY REQUIREMENTS | | | | 25) SHEET A3.2 PROVIDE THE WIND LOAD INFORMATION | | (CALCULATIONS) FOR THE ROOFTOP LIGHT POLES. ASCE 7-02. | | | | 26) A4.3 INDICATES VARIOUS PRECAST PILASTER DETAILS BUT | | THERE IS NO DETAILS FOR INSTALLATION PLEASE PROVIDE | | METHOD OF ATTACHMENT, 1405.6/ 1405.7/ 1405.9 . | | | | 27)WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE | | PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF | | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | ALL OF THE PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE STAMPED WITH | | THORTON-TOMASETTIS' SHOP DRAWING STAMP THAT THEY WERE | | REVIEWED. THE ISSUE THAT IS NOT COMMONLY KNOWN THAT THE | | OLDER MIAMI-DADE | | NOA'S THAT WERE TESTED BEFORE THE 2004 FBC MAY OR MAY | | NOT MEET THE CURRENT 2004 FBC. 1605.3.1.1 LOAD | | REDUCTIONS. BEFORE THE 2004 FBC THE MANUFACTURERS WERE | | ALLOWED TO TAKE | | 1.33 STEEL INCREASES AND DID SO WITH THERE FASTENERS. | | THE NEWER MIAMI-DADE REPORTS AND THE OLDER REPORTS THAT | | ARE BEING UPDATED ARE BEING REVIEWED FOR THE ANCHOR | | CONNECTIONS. THE | | STATEMENTIS SHOWN UNDER C CALCULATION, REVISED | | ANCHOR CALCULATIONS THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED UNDER THE | | 2004 FBC WILL STATE THE ANCHOR CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN | | REVIEWED TO THE 2004 FBC. | | PLEASE REVIEW THE INGERSOLL- RAND AND THE TRAINER GLASS | | FOR THE ANCHOR CONNECTIONS MEETING 1605.3.1.1/ 2004 | | FBC. THIS MAY AFFECT THE PRESSURES LISTED IN THE | | REPORT. | | | | 28) SHEET S0.30 PROVIDES THE ELEVATIONS WITH THE | | ILLUSTRATED INTERIOR ZONES AS WELL AS THE END ZONES, | | THE PLANS DO FAIL TO PROVIDE THE ZONE LOCATION AND | | ASSOCIATEDPRESSURES FOR THE DOORS LOCATED ON THE ROOF | | TOP STAIR TOWERS. PLEASE PROVIDE THIS ADDITIONAL | | INFORMATION TO REVIEW FOR WIND PRESSURES. 1609. 6.1.2. | | | | 29A)THE EVALUATION REPORT FROM INGERSOLL-RAND REPORT# | | S07-001 IS A COPY AND NEEDS TO BE AN ORIGINAL (3) FOR | | THRESHOLD BUILDING) SIGNED AND SEALED REPORTS. 29B) | | THIS REPORT INDICATESUNDER PRODUCT COMPARISON TO BE A | | INSWING DOOR WHERE AS UNDER EVALUATION FOR A POSITIVE | | WIND APPLICATION THE WIND LOAD APPLIED TO THE DOOR | | PANEL WOULD BE DISTRIBUTED AROUND THE FRAME EQUALLY, | | THIS WOULD REQUIRE THE DOOR & FRAME TO BE INSTALLED IN | | A OUTSWING INSTALLATION. PLEASE CORRECT STATEMENTS. | | 29C) PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS INDICATING THE | | EXTRAPOLATION OF PRESSURES OR INTERPALATION OF | | PRESSURES, DEPENDING ON REPORT. | | 29D) IT APPEARS THAT A LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL WILL BE | | REQUIRED, PLEASE FILL OUT FORM FOR A LOCAL PRODUCT | | APPROVAL FOR WEST PALM BEACH, SEE FORM ATTACHED. | | | | 30) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR TRAINER GLASS WILL REQUIRE | | FLORIDA APPROVAL COVERSHEETS, PRODUCT APPROVALS | | SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 | | ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT | | APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION PLEASE SEE THE STATE | | WEBSITE AT WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH | | STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A | | COVER SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM | | THE STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE | | APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT | | APPROVAL OR SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. | | | | 31) LOUVERS,THE PRODUCT APPROVAL THST WAS SUBMITTED | | FORAMERICAN WARMING AND VENTILATING UNDER FL# 5121 IS | | NOT THE REPORT THAT WASSPSECED ON SHEET A8.2 / W-12, | | NOTE THERE IS A | | W-13 AND NO REPORT NUMBER SPECIFIED? | | | | 32) ROOFING, NO ROOFING REPORT WAS SUBMITTED EVEN | | THOUGH THERE IS A ROOFER SIGNER ON THE PERMIT | | APPLICATION. | | THIS ROOF IS MISSING OR NOT INCOMPLIANCE WITH THE | | FOLLOW ITEMS: | | __XX_ CONTRACTOR DID NOT PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL | | REPORT. | | __XX_ CONTRACTOR FAILED TO INDICATE WHICH SUB-SYSTEM TO | | BE USED. | | __XX_ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED HAS A LOWPRESSURE FOR ZONE | | 2&3___ . | | __XX_ THE SYSTEM PROVIDED STATESLIMITATION# 7, | | SHOULD THE FASTENER RESISTANCE BE LESS THAN THAT | | REQUIRED, AS DETERMINED BY THE | | BUILDING OFFICIAL, A REVISEDFASTENER SPACING, | | PREPARED , SIGNEDAND SEALED BY A FLORIDA REGISTERED | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER, REGISTERED | | ARCHITECT OR REGISTERED ROOFCONSULTANT MAY BE | | SUBMITTED. | | __XX_ BE AWARE OF : THE SYSTEM PROVIDED INDICATES | | LIMITATION# 9, NO ENHANCEDFASTENING ALLOWED. | | | | A THOROUGH REVIEW CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A | | RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF | | THIS REVIEW. | | 102.1* WHERE, IN ANY SPECIFIC CASE, DIFFERENT SECTIONS | | OF THIS CODE SPECIFY DIFFERENT MATERIALS, METHODS OF | | CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS, THE MOST | | RESTRICTIVE SHALL GOVERN. WHERE THERE IS A CONFLICT | | BETWEEN A GENERAL REQUIREMENT AND A SPECIFIC | | REQUIREMENT, THE SPECIFIC | | REQUIREMENT SHALL BE APPLICABLE. | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
12 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-10-03 |
Time |
13:06 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-10-03 |
Time |
13:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-10-03 13:06:59 | REV FOR CHNAGING DESIGNATION FOR *FUTURE RETAIL* |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
11 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-09-29 |
Time |
14:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-09-29 |
Time |
13:40 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2008-09-29 14:12:12 | REVISED COORDINATION STUDY. | | COMMENT #2 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW WILL STILL NEED TO BE | | ADDRESSED BEFORE FINAL/CO. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
10 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-09-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-09-29 |
Time |
09:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-09-29 |
Time |
09:29 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2008-09-29 09:29:46 | ** DENIED ** | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE COORDINATE THE SELECTIVE COORDINATION | | STUDY WITH LATEST REVISED RISER ON FILE. | | PLEASE SEE SDP SWITCHBOARD WHICH INDICATES FOUR 125 AMP | | BREAKERS TO ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT. EVEN IF ONLY ONE OF | | THESE IS LEGALLY REQUIRED THE OTHER THREE MAY AFFECT | | THE COORDINATION OF THE SYSTEM. | | PLEASE VERIFY. | | 700.27, 701.18, 240.12 | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE LATEST ELECTRICAL RISER AS THIS | | INDICATES A 100 MCB FOR 10GH, YET COORDINATION STUDY | | SHOWS 60 AMP MCB. PLEASE SEE PANEL SCHEDULE AS THE | | LATEST REVISED PANEL SCHEDULE SHOWS THIS AS A 100AMP | | MAIN LUG ONLY PANEL. | | AS THE 10GH IS OF THE OPTIONAL STAND-BY SYSTEM, THIS IS | | NOT REQUIRED TO BE PART OF THE COORDINATION STUDY | | HOWEVER PLANS WILL NEED TO MATCH BEFORE CO. IF THIS | | WERE THE ONLY COMMENT A TCO COULD BE GRANTED AS THIS | | PARTICULAR PANEL IS NOT LIFE SAFETY OR LEGALLY | | REQUIRED. | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | CONTACT THIS OFFICE. | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-09-25 |
Time |
09:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-09-25 |
Time |
09:15 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2008-09-25 09:16:30 | | | EXIT LIGHT REVISION./WRT. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-08-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-08-12 |
Time |
10:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-08-12 |
Time |
10:22 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2008-08-12 10:22:41 | | | **DENIEDREVISION** | | | | ** PLEASE SEE SOME ITEMS FROM REVIEW DATED 6/25 ARE | | STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. | | | | 1) NOTE:PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW WHICH STATED THE | | REVISED ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE NEEDED DUE TO LIGHTING | | ETC BEING REVISED ON PLANS. THE RESPONSE LETTER | | MENTIONS TO SEE REVISED CALCULATIONS. HOWEVER PLEASE | | SEE THE PACKAGE AS ONLY THE CERTIFICATION SHEETS ALONG | | WITH SUMMARY SHEETS WERE SUBMITTED. PLEASE SEE SHEET | | TWO WHICH STATES THE INPUT DATA REPORT MUST BE | | SUBMITTED ALONG WITH COMPLIANCE REPORT. AS NO INPUT | | DATA REPORT WAS SUBMITTED A REVIEW OF THE SPECIFIC | | ITEMS ON PLANS CAN NOT BE REVISED AT THIS TIME. | | PLEASE BE SURE ALL REVISED LIGHTING ON PLANS ALONG WITH | | ALL OTHER COMPONENTS OF BUILDING REFLECTS THE INPUT | | DATA REPORT. | | 13-400.3B, 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2, AND .1.3. | | | | ** PLEASE SEE THE *CERTIFICATION SHEET* WHICH REQUIRES | | THE SIGNING, SEALING DATING AND OTHER INFORMATION TO BE | | COMPLETED. AS THESE DOCUMENTS ARE ALSO PART OF | | INFORMATION SENT TO THE STATE, THE CERTIFICATION SHEET | | NEEDS TO BE COMPLETED. SIGNING AND SEALING THE COVER | | SHEET DOES NOT PROVIDE THE INFORMATION ON THE | | CERTIFICATION SHEETS. | | 13-103.1, FS 471.025 | | | | 2) NOTE: AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW WHY WAS THE | | PHOTO-METRICS BEING SUBMITTED IF LIGHTING WAS NOT BEING | | REVISED? THE RESPONSE MENTIONS *INDUCTION LIGHTING * | | ETC. | | PLEASE BE SURE THERE IS COORDINATION BETWEEN ALL | | REVISED LIGHTING PLANS, PHOTO-METRICS AND CALCULATIONS | | AS NOTED ABOVE. | | FOR EXAMPLE: | | PLEASE SEE THE QUARTZ LIGHT FIXTURES AS NOTED ON | | PHOTO-METRICS ARE NOT THE SAME AS THE FIXTURES LISTED | | ON FIXTURE LEGEND FOR MANUFACTURE, WATTAGE ETC | | | | FOR EXAMPLE: | | PLEASE TAKE A LOOK AT THE FIXTURE DESIGNATIONS AND | | COORDINATED ANY CHANGES AS NEEDED. | | | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW AT THIS TIME THERE ARE NO COMMENTS | | ON SHEETS 2.1,2.2,4.1,5.1 AND 6.1 HOWEVER BASED ON | | OTHER COMMENTSTHESE MAY OR MAY NOT BE REVISED. | | IF NO REVISIONS ARE MADE PLEASE BE SURE TO SUBMIT THESE | | SHEETS BACK WHEN OTHER CORRECTIONS. | | | | | | | | | | **IMPORTANT** | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-07-08 |
Time |
15:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-07-08 |
Time |
15:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-07-08 15:25:48 | ** DENIEDREVISIONS ** | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE COORDINATE THE COMMENTS FROM REV #5 | | PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED FOR ELECTRICAL | | 6/26/08. THESE REVISIONS WERE SUBMITTED BEFORE COMMENTS | | FROM 6/26 WERE GENERATED. | | PLEASE ALSO SEE COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES WHICH MAY | | AFFECT PLANS, LAYOUT ETC. | | THIS IS FOR SHEETS E3.1 AND 4.1 | | | | | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | DELAYS. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-06-25 |
Time |
11:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-06-24 |
Time |
17:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-06-25 11:54:59 | ** DENIEDREVIEW ** | | | | | | | | 1)NOTE: PLEASESEE SHEET E1.1 WHICH STATES REVISIONS | | DUE TO PERMIT COMMENTS HOWEVERTHERE IS NO RECORD OF | | ANY COMMENTS. | | PLEASE COORDINATE PLANS OR PROVIDE A RESPONSE FOR | | REVISED ITEMS TO CLARIFY. | | 106.5, 106.1.1 | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE STORAGE ROOM WHICH HAS NOW BEEN | | CHANGED TO THE *METER STORAGE* HOWEVER IS ALSO NOW A | | WORK SHOP OF SORTS. | | THIS ROOM HAS NOW BEEN AIR CONDITIONED WHICH WILL | | REQUIRE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO BE REVISED. PLEASE | | SEE SHEET 3.1 WHICH DOES NOT HAVE THE REVISED ROOM | | LAYOUT. | | PLEASE COORDINATE PLANS. | | FBC 106.5,106.1.1,106.1.2 | | FBC CHAPTER 13, 13-400.3.B. | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SHEET E3.1 WHICH STATES A REVISION | | #5. THE ONLY REV #5 ON SHEET WAS UNDER ONE OF THE SCALE | | DETAILS. THIS SCALE DETAIL SHOWING 1/4INCH = 1FTIS | | THE SAME AS PREVIOUS PLANS WHICH INDICATED A REV #4 | | WITH THE SAME LOCATION CONTAINING A CLOUD FOR REVISING | | THE SCALE. | | A REVISED PLAN ALONG WITH CLOUDS OR TRIANGLES SHOWING | | THE REVISED ITEMS NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED. PLEASE KNOW | | ANY REVISIONS MAY ALSO BE NOTED IN A LETTER INFORMING | | THE REVIEWER OF CHANGE. THE LETTER IS NOT REQUIRED | | HOWEVER IS HELPFUL IN THE REVIEW PROCESS. | | FBC 106.1.1, 106.1.2, 106.5 FOR COORDINATION AND | | CLARITY OF RECORD PLANS. | | | | 4) NOTE: THE RISER HAS BEEN REVISED AND COORDINATE WITH | | PANEL SCHEDULES ETC ARE NEEDED. | | PLEASE SEE 1EGH SHOWS THIS PANEL FED FROM EDP HOWEVER | | EDP NO LONGER EXISTS. | | PLEASE SEE SDP SHOWS BEING FED FROM EM ATS HOVER BASED | | ON THE RISER THIS IS NO LONGER FED FROM THE EM ATS. | | 408.4 | | FBC 106.1.1, 106.1.2, 106.5 FOR COORDINATION AND | | CLARITY OF REVISED PLANS. | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SE THE MGP SHOWS SOME SORT OF | | DISCONNECTING MEANS ON RISER FOR FEEDERS FROM THE | | GENERATOR. BASED ON THE MGP PANEL SCHEDULE THIS IS A | | MAIN LUG ONLY PANEL. | | AS SHOWN ALL BREAKERS ON LOAD SIDE OF THE GENERATOR | | BREAKERS ARE NOW DISCONNECTS FOR THE GENERATOR | | FEEDERS. | | | | PLEASE BE SURE TO CLARIFY THE DISCONNECT SHOWN ON THE | | RISER CIRCLED IN RED ON ONE SET. | | PLEASE LABEL WITH NOTES FOR SIGNAGE THAT THE BREAKERS | | ON THE GENERATOR ARE NOW THE NEW DISCONNECTS FOR THE | | EMERGENCY POWER. THIS IS BASED ON THE RISER AS SHOWN. | | IF EQUIPMENT CHANGES OR THERE IS ACTUALLY A DISCONNECT | | WHICH IS NOT LABELED, THEN THIS COMMENT MAY CHANGE. | | PLEASE CALL TO GO OVER COMMENT. | | PLEASE VERIFY IF THE MGP MEETS SWITCHBOARD OR PANEL | | BOARD. PLEASE SEE COMMENTARY OF 700.9B BELOW. | | FBC 106.1.1, 106.1.2 FOR CLARITY AND COORDINATION. NEC | | 230.2E, 700.9B (FOR MGP) , 700.8, 701.9, 702.8 | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW AS REDLINED ON ORIGINAL PLANS: NO | | LOW VOLTAGE PERMITS HAVE BEEN APPLIED FOR OR ISSUED FOR | | THE LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS SHOWN ON PLANS. | | THIS IS GIVEN FOR INFORMATION SO PERMIT CAN BE APPLIED | | FOR BEFORE SCOPE OF WORK COMMENCES. | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE VERIFY WHY PHOTO-METRICS FOR ENTIRE | | BUILDIGN ARE BEING SUBMITTED. IF LIGHTING PLANS ARE NOT | | BEING REVISED FORAREAS AS SHOWN THEN REVISED | | PHOTO-METRICS ARE NOT NEEDED. | | | | | | **WHERE AN ALTERNATE POWER SOURCE SUPPLIES A | | SWITCHBOARD FROM A SINGLE FEEDER OR FEEDERS IN | | PARALLEL, THAT SWITCHBOARD MAY FURTHER DISTRIBUTE AND | | PROVIDE POWER FOR THE EMERGENCY, LEGALLY REQUIRED, AND | | OPTIONAL STANDBY SYSTEMS. | | SWITCHBOARDS PROVIDE THE PHYSICAL SEPARATION | | REQUIREMENTS OF BOTH SYSTEM AND WIRING FROM A COMMON | | POWER SOURCE. THIS PHYSICAL SEPARATION CANNOT OCCUR | | WITHIN A PANELBOARD ENCLOSURE BECAUSE OF ITS OPEN | | DESIGN. INDIVIDUAL OVERCURRENT SECTIONS CAN SUPPLY | | EMERGENCY, LEGALLY REQUIRED, AND OPTIONAL STANDBY | | TRANSFER SWITCHES.** | | | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-04-14 |
Time |
16:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-04-14 |
Time |
16:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-14 16:31:13 | OWNER AGENT TO SIGN ENERGY CALCULATIONS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-04-01 |
Time |
19:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-04-01 |
Time |
19:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-01 19:54:58 | ** DENIED4TH REVIEW** | | | | ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS | | REVIEWS WHICH ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE FIRST TWO REVIEWS REQUESTED THE | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO BE SUBMITTED AND NOT UNTIL THE | | THIRD REVIEW WERE THESE DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. THE THIRD | | REVIEW WAS THE FIRST TIME THIS OFFICE WAS TO REVIEW | | PLANS AND CALCULATIONS. THERE WERE COMMENTS WITH | | RESPECT TO THE TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT SETS OF | | CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED. THERE WERE ALSO COMMENTS WITH | | RESPECT THAT ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THE PLANS | | NEEDS TO COORDINATE WITH THE INPUT DATA REPORT. SOME | | EXAMPLES WERE GIVEN ON BOTH SETS OF CALCULATIONS | | PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FOR THE THIRD REVIEW. PLEASE SEE | | THAT PLANS AND LIGHTING ON THE CALCULATIONS STILL DO | | NOT COORDINATE. PLEASE SEE THERE ARE FIXTURES ON PLANS | | WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN DESIGNATION OR ARE NOT THE SAME AS | | PLACED IN THE INPUT DATA REPORT. THE INPUT DATA REPORT | | WILL BE NOTED AS IDR FOR THE REMAINDER OF THIS | | COMMENT. | | THIS OFFICE WILL GIVE SOME EXAMPLES ONCE AGAIN: | | EXAMPLE: | | PLEASE SEE THE PLANS AND DESIGNATIONS ON FIXTURES FOR | | ROOF TOP FLOODS. (ALSO NOTED AS 20FT POLES) WHAT IS THE | | WATTAGE ON THESE FIXTURES? PLEASE TAKE A LOOK AT THE | | IDR AS THESE FIXTURES COULD NOT BE IDENTIFIED. | | EXAMPLE: | | PLEASE SEE THE IDR WHICH CONTAINS 800W FIXTURES YET THE | | PLANS NOR THE FIXTURE LEGEND SHOW ANY 800W FIXTURES. | | EXAMPLE: | | PLEASE SEE THE IDR WHICH CONTAINS 4000W FIXTURES YET | | THE PLANS NOR THE FIXTURE LEGEND SHOW ANY 4000W | | FIXTURES. | | EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE THE IDR REPORT INDICATES 169 W AND | | 168W FIXTURES, ARE THESE THE *C-EM* FIXTURES? EXAMPLE: | | PLEASE SEE THE FIXTURE *A*, THESE ARE NOTED ON THE | | FIXTURE LEGEND AS 150W/VA RATED FIXTURES, YET THE *AE* | | FIXTURES ARE NOTED ON FIXTURE LEGEND AS *Q100* AND THE | | MANUFACTURES CATALOG INFORMATION STATES 150W. WHICH | | ONES ARE THESE AND PLEASE SEE THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF *A* | | AND *AE* FIXTURES ON PLANS COMPARED TO THE IDR. | | EXAMPLE: | | PLEASE TAKE A LOOK AT THE FIXTURE *B* AND *BE*. EACH OF | | THESE FIXTURES ARE SHOWN RATED ON MANUFACTURE CATALOG | | INFORMATION AS 200VA RATED, HOWEVER BASED ON THE | | FIXTURE LEGEND THE *B* IS SHOWN WITH A 200PMH AND THE | | *BE* FIXTURES ARE SHOWN LIKE THE *AE* FIXTURES WITH A | | Q-100. WHAT ARE THESE? HOW ARE THESE ARE ALL FIGURED | | INTO THE IDR? THE IDR DOES SHOW SOME 100W FIXTURES | | HOWEVER ONLY FOUR. | | EXAMPLE: | | PLEASE SEE IN ZONE #2 WHICH SHOWS 9-32W FIXTURES ON THE | | IDR HOWEVER THE AMOUNT OF THESE FIXTURES BASED ON PLANS | | IS HIGHER. PLEASE TAKE A LOOK AT THE LIGHTING ON THE | | SHEET E1.1 FOR THE ELEVATOR MACHINE ROOMS. THESE SAME | | ROOMS ON THE SHEET E2.2 SHOW MORE FIXTURES THAN ON E1.1 | | AND ALSO THESE FIXTURES IN THESE ROOMS ARE LABELED AS | | *B* FIXTURES. HOW ARE THESE NOW *B* FIXTURES IF THE *B* | | FIXTURES ON THE FIXTURE LEGEND ARE 200W MH? PLEASE ALSO | | CORRELATE THE AMOUNT OF FIXTURES. | | EXAMPLE: | | PLEASE SEE THE FIXTURES FOR IN ZONE #4 (OFFICE). PLEASE | | SEE THE AMOUNT OF 64W FIXTURES ON PLANS IS HIGHER THAN | | THE IDR WHICH SHOWS ONLY ONE OF THESE FIXTURES. | | EXAMPLE: | | PLEASE SEE THE TYPE OF FIXTURE BULBS SHOULD COORDINATE | | WITH PLANS. ALL FIXTURES ARE NOTED ON THE IDR AS THE | | FOLLOWING: FLUORESCENT OR METAL HALIDE, HOW IS THIS | | POSSIBLE? | | EXAMPLE: | | PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING CONTROL METHODS ON THE IDR | | STATES *CENTRAL CONTROL* FOR ALL PARKING LEVEL | | LIGHTING. HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE? ROOF TOP/OUT-DOOR | | LIGHTING WHICH WILL NOT BE INSIDE THE ENCLOSED GARAGE | | WHICH IS GREATLY AFFECT BY DAYLIGHT SHALL BE TURNED OFF | | AS REQUIRED PER 13-415.1.ABC.1.4. SOME OF THE LIGHTING | | ON PLANS DOES THIS AND THE IDR DOES SHOW PHOTO-SENSOR | | CONTROL FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTS ONLY. IN EITHER CASE, THE | | LIGHTING ON PLANS IS NOT ON CONTROL BY CENTRAL | | STATION. | | EXAMPLE: | | PLEASE SEE THE PLANS DOES INCLUDE AN ELECTRIC WATER | | HEATER, HOWEVER THE IDR IS *BLANK*. HOW IS THIS | | POSSIBLE? | | EXAMPLE: | | PLEASE SEE THE PLANS CALL FOR FIXTURES *H* FOR THE | | EXTERIOR AND A NUMBER UNDER THE FIXTURE LEGEND AS A | | *T5C40*. THE ONLY INFORMATION ON A *T5C40* IS THIS IS A | | 175W MH BULB, YET THE IDR DOES NOT CONTAIN AN 175W | | BULBS ON THE IDR. PLEASE SEE THE LOAD ON CIRCUIT | | *INGH-15* DOES NOT CORRESPOND TO WHETHER OR NOT THESE | | ARE 40W FIXTURES OR 175W FIXTURES. PLEASE BE SURE TO | | ADJUST ANY LOAD CALCULATIONS ONCE DETERMINED. PLEASE | | SEE FBC 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3. | | 13-400.3.B, 13-415.1.B, 13-412 ETC | | | | | | ** THESE ARE SOME EXAMPLES* | | PLEASE BE SURE TO GO THROUGH ALL LIGHTING ON PLANS; | | PLEASE BE SURE TO GO THROUGH ALL CALCULATIONS AND THE | | IDR. PLEASE BE SURE TO ADJUST PHOTO-METRICS ONCE | | COORDINATION IS COMPLETED. | | IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT ALL INFORMATION ON THE IDR | | NEEDS TO COORDINATE WITH PLANS NOT ONLY THE COMMENTS | | MADE FOR ELECTRICAL. HOW IS IT POSSIBLE THAT THE IDR | | DOES NOT CONTAIN MANY OTHER DESIGN ASPECTS FOR OTHER | | TRADES SUCH AS BUILDING COMPONENTS? | | | | 2) NOTE: THIS IS ONLY BEING NOTED: THE FIXTURES IN | | STAIRS SHOWN AS D AND DDE CONTAIN 3-32W BULBS? | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE THE CERTIFICATION SHEET | | CONTAINS THE SIGNATURE FROM THE OWNER'S | | REPRESENTATIVE. | | FBC 13-103.1 | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTICE IS NOW BEING GIVEN TO FS | | 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE | | COMPLIANCE. | | THIS IS ONLY A NOTICE AT THIS TIME. THE FIRST TWO | | REVIEWS REQUESTED THE CALCULATIONS. | | THE CALCULATIONS HAVE NOW ONLY BEEN REVIEWED TWICE, | | PLEASE BE SURE ALL PLANS AND CALCULATIONS COORDINATE ON | | THE FOLLOWING REVIEW. | | ONE COPY OF PLANS AND THE CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED MAY BE | | RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE. | | | | | | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY | | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE | | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. | | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | DELAYS. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-02-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-02-16 |
Time |
16:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-02-16 |
Time |
16:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-02-16 16:08:26 | ** DENIED 3RDREVIEW ** | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED | | ARE NOT CODE COMPLIANT. THE TWO PREVIOUS REVIEWS | | REQUESTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND THIS IS THE FIRST | | TIME THESE ARE BEING SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. | | NOW TWO COMPLETELY SEPARATE SETS ARE BEING SUBMITTED. | | ONE FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE SPACE. | | ONE FOR THE PARKING GARAGE. | | PLEASE SEE THAT THE CALCULATIONS TO BE SUBMITTED ARE | | FOR ONE BUILDING AND STRUCTURE. THE FOLLOWING WILL BE | | BROKEN UP INTO SECTIONS FOR NOTES AND THE INPUT DATA | | REPORT WILL BE NOTED AS IDR. | | | | A) PLEASE SEE THE CALCULATIONS WHICH WERE SUBMITTED FOR | | THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE SPACES ARE SHOWING ONLY TWO | | INTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURES. TO BE EXACT THEY SHOW 2-35 | | WATT FIXTURES WITH A TOTAL OF 70WATTS ON THE SUMMARY | | SHEETS AS WELL AS THE IDR. THESE CALCULATIONS ARE | | SUBMITTED AND SIGNED AND SEALED BY MR. WU. | | HOW IS THIS POSSIBLE WHEN THE PLANS SHOW DOZENS OF | | FIXTURES IN THESE SAME OFFICES?? | | PLEASE SEE 13-400.3.B, 13-415.1.B, 13-415.2 | | | | B) PLEASE SEE THE CALCULATIONS FOR WHICH ARE REQUIRED | | TO HAVE THE CERTIFICATION SHEET FILLED OUT IS NOT | | DONE. | | PLEASE KNOW AS THIS SHEET IS SENT INTO THE STATE FOR | | AUDITING ALONG WITH THE COVER SHEET ALL INFORMATION ON | | THE CERTIFICATION SHEET ALONG WITH BEING SIGNED, DATED | | AND SEALED NEEDS TO BE DONE. | | PLEASE BE SURE THE OWNER AGENT IS FILLED OUT AND | | SIGNED. | | FBC 13-103.1.1.1, FS 471.025, FAC 61G15-23.002 | | | | C) PLEASE SEE THE IDR REPORT FOR EXTERIOR SUBMITTED FOR | | GARAGE NEEDS TO BE COORDINATE WITH THE ELECTRICAL | | PLANS. | | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE: EXTERIOR IDR WHICH ONLY SHOWS | | 26-H FIXTURES WHICH IS OK, HOWEVER WHERE ARE THE | | J-FIXTURES? | | PLEASE SEE THE INTERIOR LIGHTING OF THE PARKING GARAGE | | DOES NOT MATCH WITH THE COUNT OF FIXTURES, THE WATTAGE | | OF FIXTURES AND THE METHOD OF CONTROL. | | FOR EXAMPLE:PLEASE SEE THE IDR DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY | | 150W OR 100W FIXTURES, YET THE FIXTURE LEGEND CONTAINS | | THESE. | | FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE THE IDR SHOWS 16-300W FIXTURES, | | HOWEVER THE FIXTURE LEGEND DOES NOT SHOW ANY 300W | | FIXTURES. | | FOR EXAMPLE: THE IDR SHOWS METHODS OF CONTROL AS | | DAYLIGHTINGON/OFF W/ OCCUPANCY SENSORS, PROGRAMMABLE | | ETC HOWEVER BASED ON PLANS AND KNOWN TO THIS OFFICE | | MANY OF THESE LOCATIONS ARE MANUAL ON/OFF, PHOTO-SENSOR | | CONTROL, OR OCCUPANCY SENSOR WITHOUT DAYLIGHTING. | | | | D) PLEASE KNOW A NOTE WHICH WAS NOT MENTIONED BUT GIVEN | | FOR INFORMATION. IF ANY LIGHTING IS DONE FROM AN | | ASTRONOMICAL TIME CLOCK, BATTERY BACK OF CONTROLS IS | | REQUIRED FOR TEN HOURS. THIS IS ONLY NOTED AS PLANS | | INDICATE PHOTO-SENSOR CONTROLS FOR LIGHTING CONTROL | | PANEL. 13-415.1.ABC.1.4 | | | | ** PLEASE COORDINATE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND SUBMIT | | ONLY ONE. ** THERE ARE OTHER FIXTURES WHICH NEED | | COORDINATION. | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE OFFICE AREAS WHICH SHOW ALL | | LIGHTING BEING CONTROLLED BY SENTRY SWITCHING AND OVER | | RIDES. | | IN MEETING HELD BEFORE PLANS WERE RESUBMITTED THE | | COMMENT WITH RESPECT TO EMERGENCY LIGHTING FOR EGRESS | | TO CONTROLS WAS BROUGHT UP. IF AN OCCUPANT IS LOCATED | | IN ANY AREA OF THESE OFFICES (EGRESS PATHS) AND TIME | | SWEEPS LIGHTING OFF, AN OCCUPANT WOULD BE IN TOTAL | | DARKNESS IN ORDER TO FIND THEIR WAY TO AN OVER RIDE. | | THIS OFFICE WILL REQUIRE OCCUPANCY SENSORS OF SOME TYPE | | FOR MINIMUM EGRESS TO OVER RIDES AS STATED IN THE | | FOLLOWING SECTIONS OF THE FBC AND LIFE SAFETY CODES. | | **PLEASE SEE FBC 1006.1.2 AND NFPA-101 7.8.1.2.2 WITH | | RESPECT TO AUTOMATED DEVICES IN EGRESS PATHS. THIS IS | | PERMITTED BY BOTH CODES HOWEVER THE COVERAGE OF SUCH | | UNITS SHALL BE SUFFICIENT FOR ALL AREAS, THE DEVICES | | ARE REQUIRED TO BE 15MINS OF TIME FOR ON AND SHALL ALSO | | BE FAIL SAFE ON. | | PLEASE KNOW AS MENTIONED ON PREVIOUS PROJECTS WITH | | RESPECT TO FBC AND CHAPTER 13 THIS AHJ DOESHAVE AN | | ISSUE WITH NIGHT LIGHTS AS LONG AS THE LIGHTING BEING | | LEFT ON DOES NOT EXCEED THE MINIMUM LEVELS OF 1FT | | CANDLES WITHIN REASON FOR EGRESS AREAS. | | AS SHOWN AT THIS TIME, AN OCCUPANT ON STAIRS WOULD BE | | OK AS A NIGHT LIGHT WAS DESIGNATED AND ADDED TO PLANS. | | PLEASE SEE SOME OTHER EGRESS PATHS MAY NOT HAVE ANY | | AMBIENT LIGHTING FROM OUTSIDE OR OTHER AREAS TO PROVIDE | | NEEDED MINIMUM. | | PLEASE INCLUDE OCCUPANCY DEVICES OR OTHER MEANS. | | ** PLEASE KNOW THIS MAY BE PART OF A PROVISO IN ORDER | | TO NOT HAVE TO REPRINT SHEETS HOWEVER COMMENT NUMBER 1 | | ABOVE WILL KEEP FROM ISSUANCE AT THIS TIME. | | | | ** MAY CALL TO GO OVER. | | | | ** A CALL WAS PLACED TO THE ENGINEERS OFFICE AS OF | | REVIEW AND LEFT VOICEMAIL. | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | DELAYS. | | | | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY | | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE | | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. | | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-12-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-12-26 |
Time |
14:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-12-25 |
Time |
13:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-12-26 14:04:50 | | | *** DENIED2ND REVIEW*** | | | | ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL COMMENTS FROM THE | | PREVIOUS REVIEW WHICH ARE STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. | | PLEASE ALSO SEE AS STATED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW THERE WERE | | ITEMS NOT YET SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW WHICH COULD CREATE | | NEW COMMENTS. THIS WILL ALSO REMAIN AS THERE ARE NEW | | ITEMS ONLY NOW BEING SUBMITTED FOR THE FIRST REVIEW | | ALONG WITH ITEMS WHICH HAVE STILL NOT BEEN SUBMITTED. | | REVIEW COMMENTS CAN ONLY BE MADE ON PLANS AND | | DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED. | | | | | | 1) NOTE:THIS NOTE REMAINS AS THERE ARE STILL CODES | | REFLECTED ON PLANS WHICH ARE NOT CURRENT OR LATEST | | ADOPTED EDITIONS AS PREVIOUSLY NOTES: FOR EXAMPLE: | | PLEASE SEE LS0.0 WHICH SHOWS THE 2002 NEC/ NFPA-70. | | | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE** | | PLEASE KNOW THAT ANY PERMIT APPLICATIONS WHICH ARE | | SUBMITTED AFTER DECEMBER 8TH, 2006 PLACES PROJECTS | | UNDER THE NEW CODES ADOPTED BY THE STATE. PLEASE SEE | | THAT THIS SHALL INCLUDE 2006 REVISIONS TO THE 2004 FBC | | FOR ALL TRADES AND THE 2005 NFPA-70. PLEASE KNOW THERE | | ARE CHANGES IN THE FBC WHICH MAY AFFECT DESIGNS FOR ALL | | TRADES. | | PLEASE LIST THE FOLLOWING ON ELECTRICAL SHEETS FOR THIS | | REVIEWER AT A MINIMUM. | | 2004 FBC W/ 2006 REVISIONS | | 2005 NFPA-70 | | 2002 NFPA-72 | | 2003 NFPA-101 | | 2002 NFPA-110 | | 2003 NFPA-20 | | | | ** PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE THE T-1 SHEET WHICH CONTAINS | | CODE WHICH IS NOT ACCURATE OR NO LONGER ADOPTED BY THE | | STATE. | | PLEASE SEE THE 2002 NEC NOTED, PLEASE SEE A 2004 | | NFPA-101 WAS NOTED AND 2003 REVISIONS TO THE FBC. | | PLEASE SEE SOME OF THE CODE ON LS SHEET HAS BEEN | | UPDATED HOWEVER LS SHEET STILL INDICATES SOME CODE NO | | LONGER IN ADOPTION. | | ** MANY OF THESE ARE OK ON ELECTRICAL PLANS. | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PERMIT APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED | | AS PREVIOUSLY NOTED WERE NOT CORRECTED. PLEASE SEE THE | | DUPLICATE APPLICATION WHICH HAS CONTRACTORS SIGNED | | STILL NEEDS TO BE NOTARIZED. | | THIS WAS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE #34. | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FPL VAULT IS STILL SHOWING POWER | | BEING FED INTO THIS ROOM WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED PER FPL | | VAULT STANDARDS AND VAULT SPECIFICATIONS. PLEASE SEE | | E2.1, REDLINED SET FOR THIS ENLARGED ROOM LAYOUT. | | ** PREVIOUS NOTE #6 ** | | | | 4) NOTE:PLEASE SEE SHEET E2.1, WHAT IS THE MSBE-3 | | DESIGNATION ON THE PLANS AT THE FIRE PUMP ROOM? | | IT IS UNCLEAR WHAT THIS IS AT THIS TIME. | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED PHOTO-METRICS FOR | | EGRESS PATHS WHICH MEET THE MINIMUM LIGHTING LEVELS AS | | REQUIRED PER NFPA-101 7.8 AND 7.9. | | PLEASE SEE 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.2 | | THE RESPONSE LETTER MENTIONS THIS WILL BE DONE AT A | | LATER DATE; HOWEVER THIS IS REQUIRED AT THIS TIME TO | | MEET THE MINIMUM FOR LIFE SAFETY. | | PLEASE SEE THE LIGHT FIXTURES SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT | | CORRELATE WITH THE FIXTURE LEGEND.FOR EXAMPLE: PLEASE | | SEE B-EM WHICH IS NOT LISTED. | | PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE HID FIXTURES FOR BACK | | UP AND TIME RESPONSE AS THESE ARE LIFE SAFETY FIXTURES. | | HOW WILL THE FIXTURE PROVIDE REQUIRED LIGHTING IN THE | | TIME GIVEN IF THESE ARE HID? | | PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING IN STAIRS STILL SHOW A STANDARD | | FIXTURE WITH NO BATTERY BACK UP OF ANY KIND. BATTERY | | BACK UP FOR THE 1FT CANDLE MINIMUM WILL BE REQUIRED. | | PLEASE SEE THE ROOMS ARE PREVIOUSLY SPECIFIED WILL | | REQUIRE BATTERY BACK UP FIXTURES OF SOME KIND. THE REST | | OF THE RESPONSE STATES A COMMENT ABOUT THE STAIRS. | | THE SECTION WITH RESPECT TO THE SPIRAL STAIR HAS BEEN | | REMOVED AND REQUIRED EGRESS WAS CONFIRMED WITH THE | | BUILDING REVIEWER. | | LS 101 7.8, 7.9 AND SECTIONS GIVEN IN PREVIOUS REVIEW | | NOTES BELOW. | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES** | | MOST OF THESE WERE SUBMITTED HOWEVER PLEASE SEE THE | | MINIMUM AVERAGE ON SHEETS FOR NORMAL DO NOT MEET THE | | MINIMUM LEVELS. | | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO | | CONTAIN SOME SORT OF BATTERY BACK UP LIGHTING FIXTURE. | | THE STAIR TOWERS WILL REQUIRE A BATTERY BACK UP FIXTURE | | OF SOME TYPE TO MEET THE MINIMUM OF 1FT CANDLE LEVEL | | UNDER EMERGENCY.7.8.2.1, 7.9.2.2 | | PLEASE SEE THE OTHER LOCATIONS WILL BE THE GENERATOR | | ROOM, FIRE PUMP ROOM, MAIN ELECTRICAL ROOM, EMERGENCY | | MAIN ELECTRICAL ROOM, AND THE ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT ROOMS. | | (SOME OF THESE MAY ALREADY SHOW A BATTERY BACK UP | | FIXTURE, BUT MOST DO NOT). | | 700.12F. | | PLEASE SEE 700.16 FOR THESE SAME ROOMS. | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE #8 WITH RESPECT TO | | THE WIND LOADS ON ROOF TOP POLES WITH THE EFFECTIVE | | PROJECTED AREA. THE LIGHT POLE DETAIL ON SHEET 7.1 DOES | | NOT CORRELATE WITH THE AMOUNT OF LIGHTING FIXTURES | | SHOWN ON POLES ON E1.2. | | RESPONSE MENTIONS CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED, HOWEVER THE | | LOCATION IN BINDER WHICH IS LABELED FOR POLE | | CALCULATIONS IS EMPTY?? | | PLEASE KNOW THE ROOF TOP LIGHTING POLES WILL BE | | REQUIRED TO HAVE STRUCTURAL WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS AND | | WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING REVIEWER. | | ** THIS IS NOTED FOR INFORMATION. | | | | 7) NOTE:PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE #10. THE CODE | | SECTIONS GIVEN WERE FOR REQUIRED DEDICATED CIRCUITS. | | PLEASE SEE THE RESPONSE MENTIONS THIS WAS DONE. | | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING FOR A COUPLE OF EXAMPLES: | | PLEASE SEE E1.1, AS CIRCUIT 1EGL-1 STILL FEEDS ELEVATOR | | PITS ON NORTH SIDE AS WELL AS SOUTH SIDE ELEVATOR | | PITS. | | PLEASE SEE CIRCUIT 1EGH-19 AS THIS CIRCUIT IS SHOWN ON | | E2.2 AS FEEDING BOTH ROOMS ON NORTH AND SOUTH SIDE | | ELEVATOR ROOMS. | | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING COMMENT AND THE NOTE FROM | | PREVIOUS REVIEW. | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE #13. SAME | | COMMENT. | | RESPONSE MENTIONS TO SEE E1.1 AND DETAIL 01 AND ALSO | | SAYS TO SEE E0.1? | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** | | PLEASE SEE 620.23 AS THE EXPLANATORY NOTE IN THE | | HANDBOOK FOR ELEVATOR PIT LIGHTING REQUIRES A 5FT | | CANDLE LIGHTING LEVEL. | | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING WHICH WAS EXTRACTED FOR THIS | | SECTION ON THE NEC. | | *ASME A17.1-2004, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND | | ESCALATORS, REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 5 FT-CANDLES (54 LUX) | | AT THE PIT FLOOR AND REQUIRES LUMINAIRES TO BE | | EXTERNALLY GUARDED TO PREVENT ACCIDENTAL BREAKAGE.* | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE LIGHTING SYSTEM IN OFFICES AS SOME | | AREAS DO NOT SHOW CONTROL/COMPLETED SYSTEM. PLEASE SEE | | SHEET E6.1 FOR EXAMPLE AS THE LCP IS BASICALLY BLANK. | | WHAT IS THIS? | | PLEASE SEE ALL AREAS PER CODE NOT DONE. | | PLEASE SEE NOTES FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW EVEN GAVE | | EXAMPLES AND SPECIFIC ROOMS SUCH AS RETAIL SPACES, YET | | NO CHANGES WERE MADE. | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND 1.3. | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING ENERGY CALCULATIONS/ | | LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS PER 13-415.2 AND | | 13-415.2.ABC.1.3 ETC. RESPONSE MENTIONS TO SEE ATTACHED | | CALCULATIONS HOWEVER THIS REVIEWER HAS GONE THROUGH ALL | | BOOKS AS SUBMITTED. PLANS DO NOT SHOW MINIMUM | | COMPLIANCE FOR MAXIMUM LIGHTING LEVELS FOR INTERIOR OR | | EXTERIOR LIGHTING. | | PLEASE SEE SOME AREAS OF THIS BUILDING WILL HAVE | | CONDITIONED SPACE. | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE #17. | | PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED INFORMATION FOR FIRE PUMP AND | | LOCKED ROTOR OVER CURRENT PROTECTION AND AMPERAGES. THE | | NOTE HERE FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW IS BASICALLY THE SAME. | | THE RESPONSE MENTIONS THESE ITEMS WERE REVISED AND | | ADJUSTED HOWEVER PLEASE SEE RISER SHEET E5.1. ?? | | PLEASE SEE FP SHEET FP0.1 AS THIS SHEET STILL SHOWS THE | | SAME INFORMATION FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW WHICH DOES NOT | | CORRELATE WITH ELECTRICAL SHEETS NOR DOES IT COORDINATE | | WITH THE FIRE PUMP SUBMITTALS. | | PLEASE ADJUST PLANS AND IF THERE IS ANY QUESTION ON | | WHAT IS MEANT FROM THE TYPED COMMENT, PLEASE CALL TO GO | | OVER. | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** | | PLEASE SEE NEC 695.4B1, 9.3.2.2.3.2(A), (B) ETC PLEASE | | SEE THE ELECTRICAL PLANS INDICATE A DISCONNECT WITH | | OVER CURRENT PROTECTION AHEAD OF THE FIRE PUMP | | CONTROLLER WHICH WILL ALSO CONTAIN OVER CURRENT | | PROTECTION. | | PLEASE KNOW THERE MAY NOT BE OVER CURRENT PROTECTION ON | | THE LINE SIDE OF THE FIRE PUMP CONTROLLER. THE TYPICAL | | LISTED FIRE PUMP CONTROLLER CONTAINS THE LOCKED ROTOR | | CURRENT SETTING FOR THE SELECTED PUMP AND ASSEMBLY. | | 10.4.4.1 NFPA-20 | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE FIRE PUMP IS BEING SHOWN AS 60 HP | | ON FP SHEETS AND 75HP ON ELECTRICAL SHEETS. | | PLEASE SEE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON WHAT TYPE OF BREAKERS | | ARE ON THE SECONDARY EMERGENCY SIDE FOR FIRE PUMP | | POWER. AS THE FIRE PUMP IS BEING FED THROUGH A TOTAL OF | | THREE BREAKERS ON THE EMERGENCY SIDE, THESE MAY CREATE | | AN ISSUE WITH SELECTIVE COORDINATION. | | PLEASE SEE THESE BREAKERS ARE TYPICALLY MAGNETIC TYPE. | | PLEASE SEE NEC 695 AND NFPA-20CHAPTER 9 AND 10. | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE #22. THE | | RESPONSE STATES *THIS HAS BEEN VERIFIED WITH FPL AND | | CAN BE GRANTED*. | | PLEASE KNOW THAT FPL HAS NO AUTHORITY OVER SERVICES | | GRANTED BY THE NEC AND ARTICLE 230.2. THE NOTE WAS HOW | | DOES THIS SEPARATE SERVICE SHOWN MEET THE NEC AND 230.2 | | NOT WHAT FPL WILL OR WILL NOT DO. | | PLEASE KNOW THIS SEPARATE SERVICE AS SHOWN IS NOT | | GRANTED. | | | | 13) NOTE: NO ACTION NEEDED, ONLY A RESPONSE FOR LETTER | | RESPONSE FROM DESIGNER. | | PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE #27, THE REQUEST WAS TO | | COMPLETE EDP1 SCHEDULE FOR FEEDERS ETC FOR THE | | ELEVATORS AND BASE DISCONNECTS.THE NOTE/REQUEST WAS | | NOT FOR THE FINAL OVER CURRENT PROTECTION FROM THE | | DISCONNECT(S) TO THE ELEVATOR MOTORS. | | THE EDP1 SCHEDULE WAS BLANK ON PREVIOUS PLANS. THANK | | YOU FOR COMPLETING INFORMATION. | | | | 14) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE #24 AS THE FIXTURES | | ON ROOF-TOP LIGHT POLES AND FIXTURE LEGEND DOES NOT | | CORRELATE. | | PLEASE SEE E1.2 FOR EXAMPLE AS THERE ARE FIXTURES ON | | PLANS WHICH ARE NOT ON THE FIXTURE LEGEND. | | PLEASE GO THROUGH CIRCUITING, FIXTURES, FIXTURE | | SCHEDULE, LIGHT POLE DETAILS ETC AND COORDINATE ALL. | | PLEASE SEE NOTE ABOVE WITH RESPECT TO OTHER PARKING | | GARAGE FIXTURES WHICH DO NOT COORDINATE WITH OTHER | | LOCATIONS. | | ** PLEASE COMPLETE. | | LS 101 7.8, 7.9, FBC 13-415.2.ABC.1.3, NEC 408.4, | | 310.16, 240.4 ETC | | FBC 106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2 | | | | 15) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE GENERATOR SPECS SUBMITTED | | INDICATE A LOAD BANK WHICH WILL NOT BE PART OF THE | | GENERATOR UNIT AND WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE MOUNTED | | SEPARATELY. PLEASE SEE THE PLANS AS THE ELECTRICAL | | RISER DIAGRAM AND PLANS DO NOT SHOW ANY BREAKER, ANY | | LOCATION, ANY CONDUCTORS ETC. | | ** PLEASE SEE SUBMITTAL IN SPEC BOOKS FOR A UNIT WHICH | | NOTES BEING PART OF THE GENERATOR? | | PLEASE COMPLETE RISER AND ADJUST AS NEEDED. | | 240.4, 310.16, 215.5, 110.3, 90.7 ETC | | FBC 106.1.2 FOR COORDINATION. | | | | | | 16) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE #29. | | RESPONSE MENTIONS THIS WAS DONE, HOWEVER COULD NOT | | LOCATE ON RISER. | | ** PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ** | | PLEASE SEE 230.2E, 700.8 ETC AS ALL MAINS ARE REQUIRED | | TO BE LABELED. | | PLEASE SEE 230.2 AS THE POWER FOR THE EMERGENCY SERVICE | | EQUIPMENT IS BEING TAPPED FROM THE NORMAL ELECTRICAL | | SERVICE. IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES PLEASE BE SURE TO | | LABEL ALL MAINS ACCORDINGLY. | | PLEASE SEE COMMENT ABOVE WITH RESPECT TO RETAIL SERVICE | | PROPOSED. | | | | 17) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE #31 WITH RESPECT TO | | COMPLETION OF RETAIL SERVICE CONDUCTORS ETC. AS THE | | RISER WILL BE CHANGING AND THE INFORMATION WAS NOT | | SHOWN ON REVISED RISER FOR TAPPED CONDUCTORS ETC, THEN | | PLEASE SEE 310.16, 240.4 , 250.6, ETC | | | | 18) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FLORIDA STATUTES WITH RESPECT TO | | REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. THIS IS ONLY A | | NOTICE GIVEN AT THIS TIME. | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | DELAYS. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | 2007-12-25 14:30:47 | 2007-12-25 14:30:47 | | | | REVIEW IN PROGRESS | 2007-12-25 13:01:05 | 2007-12-25 13:01:05 | | | | ONE SET IN ELECTRICAL FOR REVIEW. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-10-20 |
Time |
18:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-10-19 |
Time |
17:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-10-20 18:58:56 | 2007-10-20 18:58:56 | | | | *** DENIED*** | | | | **THIS IS THE FIRST REVIEW UNDER PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | | CITY PARKING GARAGE. | | 500 BANYAN BLVD. | | | | ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE ITEMS WHICH WERE NOT SUBMITTED | | FOR REVIEW OR WHICH WILL REQUIRE CHANGE ON PLANS WHICH | | MAY GENERATE NEW COMMENTS ON THE FOLLOWING REVIEW. | | THESE COMMENTS ARE BASED ON PLANS AND DOCUMENTATION | | PROVIDED. | | | | 1) NOTE:PLEASE KNOW THAT ANY PERMIT APPLICATIONS | | WHICH ARE SUBMITTED AFTER DECEMBER 8TH, 2006 PLACES | | PROJECTS UNDER THE NEW CODES ADOPTED BY THE STATE. | | PLEASE SEE THAT THIS SHALL INCLUDE 2006 REVISIONS TO | | THE 2004 FBC FOR ALL TRADES AND THE 2005 NFPA-70. | | PLEASE KNOW THERE ARE CHANGES IN THE FBC WHICH MAY | | AFFECT DESIGNS FOR ALL TRADES. | | PLEASE LIST THE FOLLOWING ON ELECTRICAL SHEETS FOR THIS | | REVIEWER AT A MINIMUM. | | 2004 FBC W/ 2006 REVISIONS | | 2005 NFPA-70 | | 2002 NFPA-72 | | 2003 NFPA-101 | | 2002 NFPA-110 | | 2003 NFPA-20 | | | | ** PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE THE T-1 SHEET WHICH CONTAINS | | CODE WHICH IS NOT ACCURATE OR NO LONGER ADOPTED BY THE | | STATE. | | PLEASE SEE THE 2002 NEC NOTED, PLEASE SEE A 2004 | | NFPA-101 WAS NOTED AND 2003 REVISIONS TO THE FBC. | | PLEASE SEE SOME OF THE CODE ON LS SHEET HAS BEEN | | UPDATED HOWEVER LS SHEET STILL INDICATES SOME CODE NO | | LONGER IN ADOPTION. | | ** MANY OF THESE ARE OK ON ELECTRICAL PLANS. | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SHEET T-1 WHICH CONTAINS | | *WHITE-OUT* ON SHEETS COVERING FIRE ALARM ON LEGEND. | | PLEASE SEE THE FIRE ALARM PLANS ARE NEEDED AND REQUIRED | | WITH THE BASE BUILDING PLANS FOR REVIEW. | | PLEASE KNOW EVEN THOUGH THE FA IS UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT | | PLEASE SUBMIT THESE AT THIS TIME TO SHOW BASE DESIGN | | INTENT AND PROTECTION. | | PLEASE SEE FBC 11-4.28.1, .2, AND .3(4) AS THE MINIMUM | | DEVICE LOCATIONS AND LEVELS FOR ADA COMPLIANCE. | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT THE MANUFACTURES SPECS/CUT SHEET | | FOR THE GENERATOR, FIRE PUMP, FIRE PUMP CONTROLLER, ATS | | AND SUB-BASE FUEL TANK. | | PLEASE SEE OTHER COMMENTS BELOW WHICH WILL AFFECT THE | | DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION AS SHOWN ON PLANS. 110.3, | | 90.7OF NEC,NFPA-20 ETC | | FBC 106.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | | 4) NOTE:PLEASE SEE FBC ADMIN SECTION 109.3.6, | | 109.3.6.4.4 WHICH REQUIRES THE STATEMENT FOR THRESHOLD | | PROJECTS ON ALL ARCH AND ENG SHEETS. | | THIS WAS DONE ON THE ARCHITECTS SHEETS HOWEVER NOT | | ALL. | | " TO THE BEST OF THE ARCHITECT'S /OR ENGINEER'S | | KNOWLEDGE, THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE | | APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES AND THE APPLICABLE | | FIRE-SAFETY STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL | | AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION AND CHAPTER | | 633 OF THE FLORIDA STATUTES". | | THIS IS REQUIRED FOR EACH DESIGN PROFESSIONAL ON | | PLANS. | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETED PHOTO-METRICS FOR | | EGRESS PATHS WHICH MEET THE MINIMUM LIGHTING LEVELS AS | | REQUIRED PER NFPA-101 7.8 AND 7.9. | | PLEASE SEE 7.8.1.3, 7.9.2.2 | | MOST OF THESE WERE SUBMITTED HOWEVER PLEASE SEE THE | | MINIMUM AVERAGE ON SHEETS FOR NORMAL DO NOT MEET THE | | MINIMUM LEVELS. | | PLEASE ALSO SEE FOR EXAMPLE THE SPIRAL STAIRS LOCATED | | IN OFFICE LOCATIONS. | | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO | | CONTAIN SOME SORT OF BATTERY BACK UP LIGHTING FIXTURE. | | THE STAIR TOWERS WILL REQUIRE A BATTERY BACK UP FIXTURE | | OF SOME TYPE TO MEET THE MINIMUM OF 1FT CANDLE LEVEL | | UNDER EMERGENCY.7.8.2.1, 7.9.2.2 | | PLEASE SEE THE OTHER LOCATIONS WILL BE THE GENERATOR | | ROOM, FIRE PUMP ROOM, MAIN ELECTRICAL ROOM, EMERGENCY | | MAIN ELECTRICAL ROOM, AND THE ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT ROOMS. | | (SOME OF THESE MAY ALREADY SHOW A BATTERY BACK UP | | FIXTURE, BUT MOST DO NOT). | | 700.12F. | | PLEASE SEE 700.16 FOR THESE SAME ROOMS. | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PLANS FOR LIGHTING AND POWER | | INDICATES ELECTRICAL LIGHTING AND RECEPTACLE IN THE FPL | | VAULT WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED PER FPL. THIS ROOM IS ALSO | | FPL LEGAL EASEMENT AREA AND IS NOT CONSIDERED PART OF | | THE GARAGE BUILDING. | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE ADDRESS OF THIS STRUCTURE WAS | | GIVEN AS 500 BANYAN BLVD. | | PLEASE ADJUST ALL TITLE BLOCKS TO INCLUDE THE ADDRESS. | | PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE THAT THERE ARE SEVERAL LOCATIONS | | ON PLANS WHICH MENTIONS THE *CLEMATIS ST GARAGE* | | INCLUDING TITLE BLOCKS. | | IF THE ADDRESS IS ASSIGNED AS BANYAN BLVD, PLEASE | | ADJUST. (ANY REQUEST FOR LOCATION DESIGNATION CHANGE | | NEEDS TO GO THROUGH ADDRESSING REVIEWER). | | FAC 61G15-23.002, 61G1-16.004 | | FBC 110.1.2, 106.5, ETC ADMIN SECTION. | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THE ROOF TOP LIGHTING POLES WILL | | BE REQUIRED TO HAVE STRUCTURAL WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS | | AND WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE BUILDING REVIEWER. | | ** THIS IS NOTED FOR INFORMATION. | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE EXHAUST FANS ON E1.1 ARE NOT | | SHOWN ON ENLARGED PLANS FOR THE SAME ROOM. | | FBC 106.1.2 FOR COORDINATION. | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 620.22-620.24 AS THE REQUIRED | | DEDICATED CIRCUITS NEEDS TO BE FOR EACH ELEVATOR | | EQUIPMENT ROOM. | | PLEASE SEE THE PLANS CURRENTLY SHOW THE SAME CIRCUITS | | FOR BOTH ROOMS WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 110.26C AS THE DOOR SWINGS ON | | ELECTRICAL ROOM DOORS MAY NOT SWING IN. PLEASE BE SURE | | TO ADJUST ON ELECTRICAL SHEETS AND BE SURE TO GIVE | | INFORMATION TO OTHER DESIGNERS FOR COORDINATION OF ALL | | SHEETS FOR ALL TRADES. | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT THE STATE OF FLORIDA GOVERNING | | ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT ROOMS. IT HAS COME TO THE ATTENTION | | ON THIS OFFICE THAT SEVERAL LOCATIONS WHEN BEING | | INSPECTED BY THE STATE FOR ELEVATOR CERTIFICATION ARE | | BEING REQUIRED TO HAVE THE EQUIPMENT ROOM AIR | | CONDITIONED. THIS IS NOT IN THE ELECTRICAL CODE. | | | | 13) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 620.23 AS THE EXPLANATORY NOTE IN | | THE HANDBOOK FOR ELEVATOR PIT LIGHTING REQUIRES A 5FT | | CANDLE LIGHTING LEVEL. | | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING WHICH WAS EXTRACTED FOR THIS | | SECTION ON THE NEC. | | *ASME A17.1-2004, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS AND | | ESCALATORS, REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 5 FT-CANDLES (54 LUX) | | AT THE PIT FLOOR AND REQUIRES LUMINAIRES TO BE | | EXTERNALLY GUARDED TO PREVENT ACCIDENTAL BREAKAGE.* | | | | 14) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY THE LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEM | | BEING PROPOSED FOR THE ENTIRE PARKING GARAGE. PLEASE | | VERIFY WITH THE CITY IF THE GARAGE AREA WHICH DO NOT | | INCLUDE ROOMS AND OFFICES IS GOING TO BE A 24HR | | OPERATION. | | IF THIS IS 24 HR OPERATION AND USE, THEN NO LIGHTING | | CONTROL SYSTEM WOULD BE SHOWN FOR MANY OF THESE | | LIGHTING FIXTURES. | | PLEASE SE THERE ARE AREAS IN WHICH THE LIGHTING | | CONTROLS FOR DURING DAYLIGHT HOURS ARE IN QUESTION. IF | | THE LIGHTING LEVELS INSIDE THE GARAGE DURING THE DAY | | FALL BELOW MINIMUM SAFETY LEVELS FOR EGRESS, WHAT WILL | | TURN THE LIGHTING ON? | | PLEASE SEE THE CIRCUITING WILL NEED TO BE ADJUSTED | | ALONG WITH ANY LIGHTING CONTROLS. | | AS THERE ARE SEVERAL UNANSWERED QUESTIONS ON THIS NOTE, | | THIS MAY NEED TO BE GONE OVER WITH CITY STAFF OTHER | | THAN PLAN REVIEW. PLANS REVIEW WILL BE FOR MINIMUM | | LIGHTING LEVELS AND CONTROLS OF THOSE LEVELS. PLEASE | | SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1, 13-415.1.ABC.1.4 ETC | | | | 15) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THAT MORE INFORMATION WILL BE | | NEEDED FOR LIGHTING IN OFFICES AND DUE TO THE | | ADJUSTMENTS POSSIBLY WITH NOTE #14 ABOVE, THE OFFICES, | | MEETINGS ROOMS ETC MAY NEED TO BE GONE OVER. PLEASE SEE | | 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2, AND .1.3. PLEASE SEE MISSING | | LIGHTING CONTROLS IN RETAIL AREAS. | | | | 16) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING ENERGY CALCULATIONS, | | LIGHTING PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS PER 13-415.2 AND | | 13-415.2.ABC.1.3 ETC. | | PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM MECHANICAL REVIEWER WHICH | | WILL BE FORTH COMING. | | PLEASE SEE SOME AREAS OF THIS BUILDING WILL HAVE | | CONDITIONED SPACE. | | | | 17) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETED INFORMATION FOR FIRE | | PUMP AND LOCKED ROTOR OVER CURRENT PROTECTION AND | | AMPERAGES. | | PLEASE SEE NEC 695.4B1, 9.3.2.2.3.2(A), (B) ETC PLEASE | | SEE THE ELECTRICAL PLANS INDICATE A DISCONNECT WITH | | OVER CURRENT PROTECTION AHEAD OF THE FIRE PUMP | | CONTROLLER WHICH WILL ALSO CONTAIN OVER CURRENT | | PROTECTION. PLEASE KNOW THERE MAY NOT BE OVER CURRENT | | PROTECTION ON THE LINE SIDE OF THE FIRE PUMP | | CONTROLLER. THE TYPICAL LISTED FIRE PUMP CONTROLLER | | CONTAINS THE LOCKED ROTOR CURRENT SETTING FOR THE | | SELECTED PUMP AND ASSEMBLY. 10.4.4.1 NFPA-20 PLEASE | | ALSO SEE THE FIRE PUMP IS BEING SHOWN AS 60 HP ON FP | | SHEETS AND 75HP ON ELECTRICAL SHEETS. | | PLEASE SEE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON WHAT TYPE OF BREAKERS | | ARE ON THE SECONDARY EMERGENCY SIDE FOR FIRE PUMP | | POWER. AS THE FIRE PUMP IS BEING FED THROUGH A TOTAL OF | | THREE BREAKERS ON THE EMERGENCY SIDE, THESE MAY CREATE | | AN ISSUE WITH SELECTIVE COORDINATION. | | PLEASE SEE THESE BREAKERS ARE TYPICALLY MAGNETIC TYPE. | | PLEASE SEE NEC 695 AND NFPA-20CHAPTER 9 AND 10. | | | | 18) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE THE MINIMUM FUEL TIMES FOR | | EMERGENCY GENERATOR AND FUEL FOR FIRE PUMP. NFPA-20 | | 9.6.2.2. (8HRS PLUS OTHER LOADS) | | | | 19) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE RISER INDICATES THE NORMAL | | FEED FROM FPL TO THE EMERGENCY SIDE OF THE FIRE PUMP | | CONTROLLER/ATS. | | PLEASE SEE THIS APPEARS TO BE A MISPRINT AND WILL NEED | | TO BE REVISED. | | FBC 106.1.2 FOR COORDINATION. | | NEC 695.1 | | | | 20) NOTE: PLEASE SEE GROUNDING DETAIL FOR GENERATOR | | DOES NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT THE SERVICE EQUIPMENT. FBC | | 106.1.2 FOR COORDINATION, | | 230.2, 230.70, 250.50 ETC | | | | 21) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AS THE RISER, PANELS AND EQUIPMENT | | NEED COORDINATION THERE ARE SOME ITEMS WHICH CAN NOT BE | | CONFIRMED AT THIS TIME. | | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE: | | A) THE RISER INDICATES THE MSB AS A 1200AMP WITH WHAT | | APPEARS TO BE A 800AMP BREAKER, HOWEVER THE MSB PANEL | | INDICATES THIS AS A 1200AMPS MAIN LUG ONLY DISTRIBUTION | | BOARD. | | | | B) PLEASE SEE 240.13, AND 230.95 CAN NOT BE CONFIRMED | | IF REQUIRED OR NOT. | | | | C) PLEASE SEE 250.30, 250.20 AND WHETHER OR NOT A | | 4-POLE ATS IS REQUIRED CAN NOT BE CONFIRMED. | | | | D) PLEASE SEE 230.70, 230.71 ETC CAN ALSO NOT ME | | CONFIRMED. IF THIS MSB DOES NOT CONTAIN A MAIN, IT DOES | | NOT MEET EITHER OF THESE TWO SECTIONS OF CODE ALONG | | WITH SEVERAL OTHERS INCLUDING 240.4 AND 310.16 | | | | THESE ARE SOME OF THE ITEMS WHICH NEED TO BE | | COORDINATED AND ADJUSTED ON PLANS. | | | | 22) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY WHERE/HOW THE ADDITIONAL | | SERVICE FOR RETAIL CAN BE GRANTED PER 230.2. | | | | 23) NOTE: PLEASE ADJUST AND PLACE ON THE LIGHTING | | PROTECTION PLANS. PLEASE KNOW ANY SYSTEM SHALL BE MEET | | NFPA-780. (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT) | | | | 24) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY FIXTURE SC ON LEGEND AND ON | | PLANS. | | PLEASE SEE THE CIRCUITING TO 5TH FLOOR LIGHTING WHICH | | IS CIRCUITED TO 1NGH-11 IS THE SAME AS THE CIRCUIT FOR | | WHAT APPEARS TO BE FEEDING THESE SC FIXTURES ON ROOF ON | | E6.1. | | PLEASE SEE ON PLANS ONLY ONE LOCATION SHOWS THE FIXTURE | | SC YET THE SYMBOL FOR THIS SAME FIXTURE APPEARS TO BE | | FOR OTHER FIXTURES BUT THEY ARE NOT LABELED OR | | IDENTIFIED. | | PLEASE COMPLETE, ADJUST AND COORDINATE. | | FBC 106.1.2. | | 408.4, 310.16, 240.4 ETC | | | | 25) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR FAIL SAFE | | OPERATION OF GATES. | | PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM FIRE MARSHAL WITH RESPECT TO | | OPERATION OF THESE GATES UNDER THE LOSS OF POWER. | | PLEASE SEE POSSIBLE CHAPTER 7 OF THE LS CODE. | | THIS IS ONLY BEING NOTED AS ANY CHANGES AND COMMENTS | | FROM OTHER TRADES SUCH AS BUILDING FOR CHAPTER 10 OF | | THE FBC AND CHAPTER 7 OF NFPA-101 WILL AFFECT THE | | ELECTRICAL PLANS. | | | | 26) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE SHEET E4.1 WHICH CONTAINS THE | | LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS/CONDUIT LOCATIONS IS LABELED AND | | IDENTIFIED AS LIGHTING PLANS AND DETAILS. | | FBC 106.1.2 FOR COORDINATION. | | | | 27) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE FEEDERS ON EDP1 IS NOT | | COMPLETE AT THIS TIME FOR MCC, AND ELEVATORS 1-4. | | PLEASE COMPLETE INFORMATION FOR THE SIZE OF THE | | ELEVATOR MOTORS SO THAT THE FEEDERS CAN BE SHOWN AND | | DETERMINED FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. | | PLEASE SEE THAT THE BASE OVER CURRENT PROTECTION AT THE | | ELEVATOR DISCONNECTS/CONTROLLERS ARE NOT REQUIRED AT | | THIS TIME UNLESS KNOWN. IF THIS INFORMATION IS KNOWN AT | | THIS TIME, THEN THIS WILL ALLEVIATE PLANS FROM HAVING | | TO BE REVISED AT A LATER DATE. AT SOME POINT IN TIME | | THE PLANS WILL BE REQUIRED TO SHOW AND INDICATE ALL OF | | THESE. | | PLEASE SEE NEC 620.1,240.4, 310.16, 408.4 ETC | | FBC 106.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | | 28) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE MAIN MEANS OF DISCONNECT FOR | | THE FEEDERS FROM THE GENERATOR APPEARS TO BE FED | | THROUGH AND *BACK-FED* BREAKER IN MSBE. | | PLEASE NOTE REJECTION CLIP IF THIS IS INDEED THE CASE. | | PLEASE SEE FBC 106.1.2 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | | 29) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 230.2E, 700.8 ETC AS ALL MAINS ARE | | REQUIRED TO BE LABELED. | | PLEASE SEE 230.2 AS THE POWER FOR THE EMERGENCY SERVICE | | EQUIPMENT IS BEING TAPPED FROM THE NORMAL ELECTRICAL | | SERVICE. IF THERE ARE ANY CHANGES PLEASE BE SURE TO | | LABEL ALL MAINS ACCORDINGLY. | | PLEASE SEE COMMENT ABOVE WITH RESPECT TO RETAIL SERVICE | | PROPOSED. AT THIS TIME THIS ADDITIONAL SERVICE AS SHOWN | | NOTED ON NOTE #22 ABOVE IS NOT GRANTED. EACH OF THOSE | | TENANT/RETAIL DISCONNECTS WOULD HAVE BEEN MAINS. | | | | 30) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTE ABOVE WITH RESPECT TO | | LIGHTING CONTROLS AND EXTERIOR LIGHTING CONTROLS PER | | 13-415.1.ABC.1.4. | | PLEASE CLARIFY HOW ALL LIGHTING ON FA?ADE IS BEING | | CONTROLLED. | | PLEASE SEE SOME OF THIS IS SHOWN BEING CONTROLLED FROM | | A PHOTO-CELL AS WELL AS A LIGHTING CONTROL PANEL. SEE | | CIRCUITING ON SCHEDULE. | | PLEASE SEE FBC 106.1.2 FOR COORDINATION. | | | | 31) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NO INFORMATION FOR CONDUITS, | | CONDUCTORS, TAPS ETC ON THE RETAIL SERVICE EQUIPMENT IS | | SHOWN. | | PLEASE COMPLETE. | | PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE COMMENT #22 ETC FOR SERVICE. | | | | 32) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NO GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM IS | | BEING SHOWN FOR THE SAME RETAIL SERVICE. | | 250.50. | | | | 33) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SELECTIVE COORDINATION IS NEEDED | | TO BE SHOWN FOR THE LIFE SAFETY ITEMS PER 240.12 | | | | 34) NOTE: PLEASE SEE TWO PERMIT APPLICATIONS WERE | | SUBMITTED AT TWO DIFFERENT TIMES ON THE SAME DAY. THE | | PERMIT APPLICATION WHICH DOES CONTAIN ALL OF THE | | SIGNATURES FOR SUB CONTRACTORS NEEDS TO BE NOTARIZED ON | | THE BACK WHERE THE CONTRACTORS AUTHORIZED AGENT IS | | SIGNED ON. THIS CAN BE DONE WHEN PLANS ARE RESUBMITTED. | | THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION WHICH WAS SUBMITTED WILL | | BECOME VOID. | | THIS CAN BE DONE AT ANY TIME BEFORE RESUBMISSION OF | | PLANS. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, OR IF THE AUTHORIZED | | AGENT IS IN THE OFFICE, THIS CAN BE DONE AT THAT TIME. | | PLEASE CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS. | | | | ** PLEASE KNOW AS THERE ARE MANY CHANGES AND ITEMS NOT | | SUBMITTED; PLEASE BE AWARE OF ANY POSSIBLE COMMENTS | | WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN MADE AT THIS TIME. | | PLEASE SEE COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES WHICH MAY HAVE AN | | AFFECT ON ELECTRICAL PLANS. | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | REVIEWER. | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | DELAYS. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | 2007-10-20 08:02:17 | | | | | IN ELEC FOR REVIEW. 1-SET ONLY, AND 1-BOOK. |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-04-04 |
Time |
09:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-04-04 |
Time |
09:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-02-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-02-28 |
Time |
13:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2008-02-28 |
Time |
13:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-02-28 13:39:43 | ***FAILED**** PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | 1.YOU NEED TO PROVETHAT YOUR FINISHED FLOOR IS HIGH | | ENOUGH TO TAKE ALL WORST FLOOD CONDITION.THEREFORE, | | PLEASE SHOW ON STORM WATER CALCULATTION THAT YOUR FF | | ELEVATION IS HIGH ENOUGH ANDHAVE CONSIDERED FLOOD | | ZONE AREA, & 5,10, 25, 100 YEAR FLOOD CRITERIA TO | | DETERMINE THE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION, PARKING LOT | | ELEVATION, CROWN OF THE ROAD ELEVATION, SIDEWALK ETC. | | ALSO, PLEASE SHOW WORST CROWN OF THE ROAD ELEVATION ON | | THE DRAWINGS. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OFSTORM WATER | | CALS TO 1000 45TH STREET ENGINEERING FOR THEIR APPROVAL | | BEFORE WE APPROVE. | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH OF THE ABOVE ITEMSIN DETAIL TO | | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-12-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-12-28 |
Time |
13:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-12-28 |
Time |
12:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-12-28 13:54:20 | ***FAILED**** PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF NOTICE OF INTENT (NOI). | | PLEASE APPLY AT FDEP, NPDES STORMWATER SECTION FOR | | NOI. | | YOU CAN GET NOI INFO FROM | | WWW.DEP.STATE.FL.US/WATER/STORMWATER/NPDES/ | | NOTICE OF INTENT DEP FORM 62-621.300(4)(B), | | EFFECTIVE MAY 1, 2003 | | | | OUR RESPONSE: WE LOOKEDAN NOI APPLICATION COPY YOU | | FILED.JUST A NOI APPLICATION YOU FILED NOT ENOUGH. | | YOU NEED TO GET A LETTER FROM FDEP THAT YOU HAVE PAID | | FEES & FILED PAPERS FOR NOI. | | | | 2.PLEASE SHOW ON STORM WATER CALCULATTION THAT YOUR | | FF ELEVATION IS HIGH ENOUGH ANDHAVE CONSIDERED FLOOD | | ZONE AREA, & 5,10, 25, 100 YEAR FLOOD CRITERIA TO | | DETERMINE THE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION, PARKING LOT | | ELEVATION, CROWN OF THE ROAD ELEVATION, SIDEWALK ETC. | | ALSO, PLEASE SHOW WORST CROWN OF THE ROAD ELEVATION ON | | THE DRAWINGS. | | | | 3. STORM WATER CALS MUST BE APPROVED FROM 1000 45TH | | STREETENG OFFICE BEFORE WE ISSUE A PERMIT. | | | | 4. WATER & SEWER PLANS MUST BE APPROVED FROM 45TH | | STREET (MANNY G.), UTILITY DEPT BEFORE WE APPROVED. | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH OF THE ABOVE ITEMSIN DETAIL TO | | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-10-24 |
Time |
13:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-10-24 |
Time |
13:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-10-24 13:48:29 | ***FAILED**** PLEASE PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF NOTICE OF INTENT (NOI). | | PLEASE APPLY AT FDEP, NPDES STORMWATER SECTION FOR | | NOI. | | YOU CAN GET NOI INFO FROM | | WWW.DEP.STATE.FL.US/WATER/STORMWATER/NPDES/ | | NOTICE OF INTENT DEP FORM 62-621.300(4)(B), | | EFFECTIVE MAY 1, 2003 | | 2. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAWINGSDUMPSTER LOCATION ON DWG, | | LOCATION MUST BE ACCESSIBLE FOR PICKUP TRUCK. YOUR NOTE | | ON SHEET C-10, SAYS "DUMPSTER AND RECEPTACLES WILL BE | | MANUALLY ROLLED OUT........." YOU NEED TO GET AN | | APPROVAL FROM CITY'S SANITATION DEPT FOR PICKUP. | | 3. PLEASE SHOW ON STORM WATER CALCULATTION THAT YOUR FF | | ELEVATION IS HIGH ENOUGH ANDHAVE CONSIDERED FLOOD | | ZONE AREA, & 5,10, 25, 100 YEAR FLOOD CRITERIA TO | | DETERMINE THE FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION, PARING LOT | | ELEVATION, CROWN OF THE ROAD ELEVATION, SIDEWALK ETC. | | ALSO, PLEASE SHOW WORST CROWN OF THE ROAD ELEVATION ON | | THE DRAWINGS. | | 4. PLEASE SHOW ON DRAINAGE DRAWINGTHE SITE AREA, | | GREEN, LAKE,PARKING AREA, IMPERVIOUS,PERVIOUS AREAYOU | | ARE DEVELOPING FOR THIS PROJECT . PLEASEMAKE SURE | | THESE AREAS SHOWN ON DRAINAGE DRAWINGS MUST MATCH WITH | | AND USED IN STORM WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS. | | 5. PLEASE SHOW ALL STORM WATER PIPES AROUND YOUR SITE | | SO, WE CANSEE THE LAYOUT OF STORM WATER PIPES FROM | | ALL OTHER STORM WATER PIPES. PLEASE SHOW DETAIL OF THE | | CONTROL STRUCTURESWITH ELEVATIONS, NOTCHES, BLEEDING | | ELEVATION, ETC ON DRAWINGS, | | 6.IN YOURCALCULATION FOR EXFILTRATION TRENCHES, PER | | SFWMD YOU NEED TOTAKE WORST ONE EITHER 1" OVER ENTIRE | | AREA OR 2.5" CRITERIA FOR % OF IMPERVIOUS AREA. SO, | | PLEASE RECALCULATE LENGTH OF EXFILTRATION TRENCH. ALSO, | | PLEASE SHOW DRY DETENTION/WET DETENTION AREAS IN STORM | | WATER CALS I YOU HAVE THEM. | | 7. ALSO PLEASE SHOW ALL CATCH BASINS NEAREST,AROUND | | YOUR SITE FOR STORM WATER DRAIN. | | 8. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF SFWMD PERMIT,, &STORM | | WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS. STORM WATER CALS MUST BE | | APPROVED FROM 100045TH STREET ENGINEERING SERVICES | | BEFORE WE ISSUE PERMIT. | | 9. POLLUTION PREVENTION DETAILS:CLOTHES USED FOR SILT | | FENCE ETC., HEIGHT OF FENCE SHOULD BE HIGH(5' OR MORE) | | ENOUGH PER FDEP TO STOP DUSTPARTICLES. | | 10. WATER & SEWER PLANS MUST BE APPROVED FROM 45TH | | STREET (MANNY G.), UTILITY DEPT BEFORE WE APPROVED. | | | | PLEASE RESPOND EACH OF THE ABOVE ITEMSIN DETAIL TO | | EXPEDITE YOUR PERMITTING PROCESS | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-10-08 |
Time |
16:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-10-08 |
Time |
16:14 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2008-10-08 16:46:50 | *****REVISION, DATED 9/16/08, APPROVED***** | | | | REVISED PLAN SHEETS LS0.0, LS.0 THRU LS.2, E3.1, FA1.1, | | AND FP1.1 WERE STAMPED, INITIALED, AND DATED. | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-09-23 |
Time |
14:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-09-23 |
Time |
14:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-09-23 14:43:18 | REVISED SHEETS LS-1 AND LS-2 DATED 9/2/08. |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-07-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-07-10 |
Time |
10:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-07-10 |
Time |
10:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-07-10 10:40:22 | REVISION DATED 6/13/08 STAMPED LS-1 AND LS-3 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-06-26 |
Time |
18:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-06-26 |
Time |
18:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-06-26 18:18:45 | *****REVISION,DATED 4/28/08,PARTIAL APPROVED***** | | | | REVISED PLAN SHEETS LS.1 AND LS.3 WERE STAMPED, | | INITIALED, AND DATED;HOWEVER E3.1 STILL NEEDS TO BE | | FIRE STAMPED | | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-04-08 |
Time |
14:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-04-08 |
Time |
13:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-08 14:50:21 | *****APPROVED***** | | | | THE COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE PLAN REVIEWS HAVE | | BEEN ADDRESSED; PLAN SHEETS C-16, LS.0 THRU LS.3, A4.2, | | A9.1, E3.1, FA0.1 THRU FA1.2, AND FP0.1 THRU FP3.1 WERE | | STAMPED, INITIALED, AND DATED. | | | | | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-03-12 |
Time |
15:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-03-12 |
Time |
14:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-03-12 15:04:57 | *****UNSAT***** | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENT TAKEN FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE PLAN | | REVIEW STILL NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED.CAPS BEHIND THE | | COMMENTS MAY BE USED AS GUIDELINES TO ADDRESS THE | | COMMENT. | | | | | | 07.A TEMPORARY STANDPIPE SYSTEM IS REQUIRED WHEN THE | | BUILDING REACHES THREE STORIES OR THIRTY FEET IN | | HEIGHT.COULD NOT LOCATE THIS NOTATATION ON SHEET | | LS0.0 AS PER YOUR RESPONSE LETTER | | | | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER INDICATING WHERE EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-01-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-01-04 |
Time |
11:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-01-04 |
Time |
09:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-01-04 11:27:15 | *****UNSAT***** | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS TAKEN FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE | | PLAN REVIEW STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED.CAPS BEHIND | | THE COMMENTS MAY BE USED AS GUIDELINES TO ADDRESS THE | | COMMENT. | | | | | | 07.A TEMPORARY STANDPIPE SYSTEM IS REQUIRED WHEN THE | | BUILDING REACHES THREE STORIES OR THIRTY FEET IN | | HEIGHT.ADD COMMENT TO SHEET LS0.0 | | | | 17.FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS TO BE MONITORED.ADD | | COMMENT TO SHEET FP0.1 | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER INDICATING WHERE EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-11-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-11-15 |
Time |
16:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-11-15 |
Time |
12:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-11-15 16:53:43 | *****DENIED***** | | | | 01.THE PROJECT SITE ADDRESS SHALL BE IN THE TITLE | | BLOCK OF EACH SUBMITTED PLAN SHEET. | | | | 02.ON SHEET T-1, MAKE REFERENCE TO NFPA 101 - 2003 | | EDITION, NOT 2004. | | | | 03.ON SHEET T-1, INCLUDE THE STANDARD FOR PARKING | | STRUCTURES NFPA 88A - 2002 EDITION. | | | | 04.DOORWAYS AND OTHER OPENINGS IN FIRE WALLS AND FIRE | | PARTITIONS SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH APPROVED FIRE DOORS | | INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 80, STANDARD FOR FIRE | | DOORS AND WINDOWS. | | | | 05.CLEAR AISLE SPACE SHALL BE MAINTAINED TO PERMIT | | READY ACCESS TO, AND THE USE OF, FIRE-FIGHTING | | EQUIPMENT. | | | | 06.FLOORS SHALL BE KEPT CLEAN AND FREE OF OIL AND | | GREASE. | | | | 07.A TEMPORARY STANDPIPE SYSTEM IS REQUIRED WHEN THE | | BUILDING REACHES THREE STORIES OR THIRTY FEET IN | | HEIGHT. | | | | 08.ON SHEET LS.O, PROVIDE DISTANCE (IN FEET) OF THE | | ADJACENT FIRE HYDRANT LOCATED AT CLEMATIS AND ROSEMARY | | TO THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE. | | | | 09.ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE | | FIGHTER'S EMERGENCY REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1. | | | | 10.ELEVATOR WARNING SIGNS (DO NOT USE IN EVENT OF | | FIRE) SHALL BE REQUIRED. | | | | 11.PLEASE PROVIDE EMERGENCY LIGHTING FACILITIES FOR | | THE MEANS OF EGRESS AREAS FOR THIS STRUCTURE. | | | | 12.DISPLAY/ILLUSTRATE THE NUMERICAL ADDRESS ON THE | | APPROPIATE EXTERIOR ELEVATION WHICH FRONTS CLEMATIS | | STREET.AS PER WEST PALM BEACH CODE, THE NUMBERS SHALL | | BE NO LESS THAN 6" IN HEIGHT AND NO LESS THAN 1" IN | | STROKE. | | | | 13.ON SHEET A4.3, ILLUSTRATE THAT THE DOUBLE DETECTOR | | VALVE ASSEMBLY IS TO CHAINED AND LOCKED. | | | | 14.ON SHEET E0.1, REFERENCE IS TO MADE TO NFPA 13 - | | 2002 EDITION, NOT 1999. | | | | 15.KNOX LOCKING CAPS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE FIRE | | DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS (FDC).FOR A APPLICATION, | | CONTACT WEST PALM BEACH FIRE PREVENTION AT | | 561-804-4724. | | | | 16.SEPARATE PLAN AND PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FO THE | | FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM INSTALLATION. | | | | 17.FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS TO BE MONITORED. | | | | 18.SPECIFY THE INTERIOR WALL AND CEILING FINISH | | MATERIALS FOR THE EXITS, EXIT AISLE CORRIDORS, AND | | OTHER SPACES IN TERMS OF CLASS A, CLASS B, OR CLASS C. | | | | | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER INDICATING WHERE EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
17 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-11-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-26 |
Time |
10:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-26 |
Time |
10:18 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2008-11-26 10:18:58 | TO "SHILL" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
16 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-09-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-26 |
Time |
14:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-26 |
Time |
14:48 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2008-09-26 14:49:21 | TO "M" BOX/2 SUBMITTALS |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
15 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-09-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-26 |
Time |
14:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-26 |
Time |
14:42 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2008-09-26 14:42:51 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
14 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-09-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-25 |
Time |
16:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-25 |
Time |
16:36 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2008-09-25 16:37:20 | TO "JWITMER" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
13 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-09-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-22 |
Time |
13:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-22 |
Time |
13:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-09-22 13:12:01 | TO "COMM" BD#45--EXPEDITED-- |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
12 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-09-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-12 |
Time |
09:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-12 |
Time |
09:40 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2008-09-12 09:40:25 | TO "SHILL" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
11 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-09-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-10 |
Time |
09:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-10 |
Time |
09:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-09-10 09:13:55 | TO "COMM" BD#33 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
10 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-08-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-08-21 |
Time |
11:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-08-21 |
Time |
11:06 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2008-08-21 11:06:46 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
9 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-07-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-30 |
Time |
08:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-30 |
Time |
08:42 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2008-07-30 08:42:52 | TO "SHILL" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-07-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-22 |
Time |
16:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-22 |
Time |
16:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-07-22 16:39:37 | TO "COMM" BD#16--EXPEDITED-- |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-06-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-17 |
Time |
08:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-17 |
Time |
08:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-06-17 08:53:21 | TO "COMM" BD#31 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-05-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-05-29 |
Time |
16:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-05-29 |
Time |
16:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-05-29 16:47:36 | TO "COMM" BD#40 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-04-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-10 |
Time |
16:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-10 |
Time |
16:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-10 16:13:22 | TO "COMM" BD#6--PLANS ON RACK--7ROLLS AND 1 | | BOX---EXPEDITED--- |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-03-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-03-28 |
Time |
15:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-03-28 |
Time |
15:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-03-28 15:55:47 | TO "COMM" BD#26/PLANS ON RACK--7 ROLLS, 1 | | BOX--EXPEDITED-- |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-02-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-02-11 |
Time |
13:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-02-11 |
Time |
13:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-02-15 15:58:37 | TO "COMM" BD#51/PLANS BY "RBROWN" OFFICE.7 ROLLS, 1 | | BOX | 2008-02-11 13:30:43 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-12-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-12-18 |
Time |
11:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-12-18 |
Time |
11:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-12-18 11:29:39 | TO "COMM" BD#47/PLANS ON RACK-3 ROLLS AND 1 BOX |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-11-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-11-15 |
Time |
12:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-09-28 |
Time |
13:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-10-17 15:04:35 | TO "COMM" BD#50--PLANS ON RACK/3 ROLLS AND BINDERS | 2007-09-28 13:22:30 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
12 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-10-02 |
Time |
14:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-10-02 |
Time |
14:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-10-02 14:36:26 | REVISED M1.1 AND M2.1 |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
11 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
|
Date |
2008-10-01 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
|
Date |
2008-10-01 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
10 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
|
Date |
2008-10-01 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
|
Date |
2008-10-01 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-09-22 |
Time |
11:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-09-22 |
Time |
11:09 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2008-09-22 11:10:01 | REVISED ENERGY CALCULATIONS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-08-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-08-07 |
Time |
16:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-08-07 |
Time |
13:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-08-07 16:21:07 | PAGE M1.1 REV 4, PAGE M2.1 REV 5 |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-07-03 |
Time |
16:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-07-03 |
Time |
16:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-07-03 16:25:07 | REVIEW #: REVISION 4 | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | 1. DATA CLOSET 2.201A IS BEING CONVERTED INTO A RETURN | | AIRR PLENUM BY INSTALLING THE AHU FOR THE | | CONFERENCE/TRAINING ROOM IN THERE. PROVIDE | | DOCUMENTATION SHOWING ALL DATA EQUIPMENT AND ALL | | ASSOCIATED MATERIALS EXPOSED WITHIN THIS PLENUM TO BE | | NONCOMBUSTIBLE OR HAS A FLAME SPREAD INDEX OF NOT MORE | | THAN 25 AND A SMOKE-DEVELOPED INDEX OF NOT MORE THAN 50 | | WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E84 PER FBCM | | 606.2.1. | | | | 2. THE DOOR ON DATA CLOSET 2.201A IS SHOWN ON DOOR | | SCHEDULE TO BE MADE OF WOOD. THIS DOOR MUST ALSO BE IN | | COMPLIANCE WITH FBCM 606.2.1. | | | | 3. IS CLOSET 2.204A ALSO TO BE A PLENUM? IF SO, THIS | | DOOR IS ALSO SHOWN ON DOOR SCHEDULE TO BE WOOD. THIS | | DOOR MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH FBCM 606.2.1. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | 561.805.6719 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-06-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-06-20 |
Time |
15:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-06-20 |
Time |
14:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-06-20 15:17:30 | REVISION #3 PAGES M0.1, M1.1, M2.1 |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-04-11 |
Time |
14:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-04-11 |
Time |
14:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-11 14:26:07 | MECHANICAL PORTION OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS OK. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-04-11 |
Time |
14:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-04-03 |
Time |
14:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-11 14:18:56 | PENDING SUCCESSFUL REVIEW OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS BY ALL | | INTERESTED TRADES. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-03-11 |
Time |
15:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-03-10 |
Time |
17:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-03-11 15:31:54 | ALL PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED, | | MECHANICAL PAGES WILL BE STAMPED. THE REVIEW WILLL | | REMAIN IN FAIL STATUS PENDING SATISFACTORY COMPLETION | | OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS. | | | | THE NEWLY SUBMITTED ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT | | ACCEPTABLE. THERE HAVE BEEN TWO SEPARATE SETS OF | | CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED. ONE SET IS METHOD A AND COVERS | | BOTH THE CONDITIONED AND UNCONDITIONED PORTIONS OF THE | | BUILDING. THE OTHER SET IS METHOD B AND ONLY COVERS ONE | | PORTION OF THE CONDITIONED SPACE IN THE BUILDING. IT IS | | NOT CLEAR WHY THE BUILDING IS BEING SPLIT FOR TWO | | DIFFERENT CALCULATIONS, YET ONE SECTION OF THE BUILDING | | IS INCLUDED IN BOTH CALCULATIONS (OFFICE AREA?). | | | | BASED ON THE FACT THAT THERE ARE UNFINISHED PORTIONS OF | | THE CONDITIONED SPACE, THE APPROPRIATE METHOD TO USE TO | | DEMONSTRATE CODE COMPLIANCE WOULD BE METHOD B OR METHOD | | C FOR THE ENTIRE BUILDING, INCLUDING ALL ENERGY | | UTILIZING SYSTEMS ON ONE REPORT. PLEASE CORRECT AND | | RESUBMIT. ONCE ALL DISCIPLINES HAVE FOUND THE ENERGY | | CALCULATIONS TO BE ACCURATELY COMPLETED AND VIA THE | | CORRECT METHOD, THIS REVIEW STATUS WILL BE CHANGED. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | 561.805.6719 | | [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-01-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-01-03 |
Time |
16:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-01-03 |
Time |
07:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-01-03 16:36:26 | REVIEW #: 2ND | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL AS DESIGNER'S WRITTEN | | RESPONSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUITY. | | | | 1. LS.1 AND LS.2: ONLY TWO OF THE 8 REFERENCES TO ?OPEN | | PARKING GARAGE? ON THESE PAGES HAVE BEEN CORRECTED. THE | | OTHER SIX ARE STILL INCORRECT. PLEASE CORRECT ALL | | REFERENCES TO AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE. FBC 406.2.1. | | | | 2. M1.1: EF-2 LOCATION IS NOT SHOWN AS BEING PROTECTED | | BY BOLLARDS ON PG A1.1 OR M1.1. PLEASE SHOW THIS FAN TO | | BE PROTECTED FROM MECHANICAL DAMAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | FBC, M 304.5. ALSO, EF-20 IS SHOWN IN THE WALL BETWEEN | | THE FIRE PUMP ROOM AND THE STORAGE ROOM AS WELL AS AT | | COLUMN LINE C. WHICH IS CORRECT? HOW WILL THIS PROVIDE | | THE REQUIRED VENTILATION FOR THE FIRE PUMP ROOM? | | | | 3 & 4: OK | | | | 5. OK EXCEPT, SEE COMMENT #2 REGARDING EF 20. | | | | 6 - 9: OK | | | | 10. IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO ASCERTAIN THE DESIGN INTENT | | RELATED TO OCCUPANCY TYPES AND REQUIRED OCCUPANCY | | SEPARATIONS RELATED TO THIS BUILDING AS THE ENTIRE | | GARAGE IS BEING CALLED ?S2 INCIDENTAL USE? ON PG LS0.0. | | THE S2 OCCUPANCY IS NOT INCIDENTAL TO THE USE OF THE | | BUILDING. IT IS THE PRIMARY USE AND OCCUPANCY OF THE | | BUILDING. THERE ARE OTHER OCCUPANCIES WHICH MAY BE | | CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL OR ACCESSORY TO THE PRIMARY | | OCCUPANCY, BUT EITHER WAY A FIRE RATED SEPARATION | | BETWEEN THESE SPACES IS REQUIRED, INCLUDING THE TYPE B | | OCCUPANCY AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC 302.1.1 AND | | 302.2 AND 302.3. | | | | THE EXHAUST DUCT PENETRATIONS IN THIS AREA WILL REQUIRE | | OPENING PROTECTIVES IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC 607.5 OR | | 607.1.1. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THESE SECTIONS AND | | COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND LIFE SAFETY PLANS. | | | | 11 & 12: OK | | | | 13. TOILET ROOMS 1.205 AND 1.206 BOTH RECEIVE SUPPLY | | AIR FROM AHU #3. ALL AIR SUPPLIED TO SUCH SPACES SHALL | | BE EXHAUSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC, M 403.2.1(3). IF | | THE LIGHT SWITCHES ARE OFF AND AHU #3 IS RUNNING, HOW | | WILL THE AIR BEING SUPPLIED TO THESE SPACES BE | | EXHAUSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION? THE | | REQUIREMENTS OF401.3 AND 403.2.1(3) SHALL BE MET FOR | | THESE SPACES. | | | | 14 - 17: OK | | | | 18. OK PENDING BUILDING PLAN REVIEW. | | | | 19. OK | | | | 20. M4.1: DETAIL 03 SHOWS A SECONDARY DRAIN OFF A | | SECONDARY DRAIN PAN TIED INTO THE PRIMARY DRAIN LINE. | | THIS IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE MEANS OF AUXILIARY OR | | SECONDARY DRAIN PROTECTION. SEE FBC, M 307.2.3 FOR A | | LIST OF APPROVED METHODS AND SHOW COMPLIANCE. | | | | 21. MOTORIZED DAMPERS HAVE NOT BEEN SHOWN IN THE O.A. | | DUCT ON PLANS FOR AHU-1 OR AHU-2. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH | | FBC 13-409.1.ABC.3.3. GRAVITY OPERATED DAMPERS | | (BACKDRAFT DAMPERS) ARE ACCEPTABLE ON BATHROOM EXHAUST | | DUCTS. | | | | 22. OK | | | | 23. NO ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE FORM COULD BE FOUND IN | | THIS SUBMITTAL. | | | | 24 ? 26: OK | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | 561.805.6719 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-10-29 |
Time |
17:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-10-25 |
Time |
20:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-10-29 15:15:34 | REVIEW #: 1 | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2005 AND 2006 SUPPLEMENTS FBC | | CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | 1. PG LS.0 DECLARES AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE, BUT | | LS.1 AND LS.2 ARE SHOWING AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE. | | CORRECT ALL REFERENCES, SHOWING THIS TO BE AN ENCLOSED | | PARKING GARAGE. FBC 406.2.1 | | | | 2. PG M1.1: EF-1, EF-2, EF-20 AND RELATED DUCTWORK, | | WHAT IS THEIR ELEVATION? APPLIANCES LOCATED IN PUBLIC | | GARAGES OR OTHER AREAS FREQUENTED BY MOTOR VEHICLES, | | SHALL BE INSTALLED A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR. | | WHERE MOTOR VEHICLES EXCEED 6 FEET IN HEIGHT AND ARE | | CAPABLE OF PASSING UNDER AN APPLIANCE, APPLIANCES SHALL | | BE INSTALLED A MINIMUM OF 2 FEET HIGHER ABOVE THE FLOOR | | THAN THE HEIGHT OF THE TALLEST VEHICLE UNLESS THE | | APPLIANCES ARE PROTECTED FROM MOTOR VEHICLE IMPACT AND | | INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 88B. FBC,M 304.5 | | | | 3. PG M1.1: EF-11 IN STORAGE ROOM 1.108 IS SHOWN TO | | DISCHARGE INSIDE THE ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE. THE AIR | | REMOVED BY EVERY MECHANICAL EXHAUST SYSTEM SHALL BE | | DISCHARGED OUTDOORS AT A POINT WHERE IT WILL NOT CAUSE | | A NUISANCE AND FROM WHICH IT CANNOT AGAIN BE READILY | | DRAWN IN BY A VENTILATING SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | FBC,M 501.2. AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE IS NOT | | OUTDOORS. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTION. | | | | 4. PG M0.1: FAN SCHEDULE CALLS FOR EF-12 IN STORAGE | | ROOM 1.109. HOWEVER, EF-12 IS NOT SHOWN ON PG M1.1 AND | | PG M1.2 SHOWS EF-11 IN THIS ROOM. COORDINATE ALL FLOOR | | PLANS AND SCHEDULES. FBC,M 501.1 AND FBC 106.1.1. ALSO, | | EF-12 IN ROOM 1.109 IS DISCHARGING INTO THE ENCLOSED | | PARKING GARAGE. THE AIR REMOVED BY EVERY MECHANICAL | | EXHAUST SYSTEM SHALL BE DISCHARGED OUTDOORS AT A POINT | | WHERE IT WILL NOT CAUSE A NUISANCE AND FROM WHICH IT | | CANNOT AGAIN BE READILY DRAWN IN BY A VENTILATING | | SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC,M 501.2. AN ENCLOSED | | PARKING GARAGE IS NOT OUTDOORS. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH | | THIS SECTTION. | | | | 5. PG M1.1: EF-20 ON 1ST FLOOR, EF-21 ON 2ND FLOOR, | | EF-5A AND EF-22 ON 3RD FLOOR ARE NOT SHOWN TO BE | | PROTECTED FROM MECHANICAL DAMAGE. SHOW THESE FANS TO BE | | PROTECTED FROM VEHICLE IMPACT OR OTHER MECHANICAL | | DAMAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC,M 303.4 AND 304.5. | | | | 6. PG M1.2: EF-23 ON 4TH FLOOR AND EF-24 ON 5TH FLOOR | | ARE NOT SHOWN TO BE PROTECTED FROM MECHANICAL DAMAGE. | | SHOW THESE FANS TO BE PROTECTED FROM VEHICLE IMPACT OR | | OTHER MECHANICAL DAMAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC,M 303.4 | | AND 304.5. | | | | 7. PG M2.1: KEY NOTE #3, WILL 7 FT BE AT LEAST 2 FT | | ABOVE THE HEIGHT OF THE TALLEST VEHICLE IN THE GARAGE? | | SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC,M 304.5. | | | | 8. PG M2.1 DETAIL 02: L-13 O.A INTAKE LOUVER IS | | ADJACENT TO THE PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCE. MECHANICAL | | OUTSIDE AIR INTAKE OPENINGS SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM | | OF 10 FEET FROM ANY HAZARDOUS OR NOXIOUS CONTAMINANT, | | SUCH AS STREETS, ALLEYS, PARKING LOTS AND LOADING DOCKS | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC,M 401.5.1. SHOW A LOCATION FOR | | THE O.A. INTAKE WHICH IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS | | SECTION. | | | | 9. PG M2.1 DETAIL 02: EF-13, 14 AND 16, ARE THESE | | EXHAUST OUTLETS DISCHARGING ONTO WALKWAYS? SHOW | | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC,M 401.5.2. ALSO, EF-16 SHALL | | DISCHARGE DIRCTLY TO THE OUTDOORS IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | FBC,M 501.2. | | | | 10. PG M2.1 DETAIL 02: EF 13, 14 AND 16 EXHAUST DUCTS, | | IF THE WALL SEPARATING OFFICES FROM THE PARKING GARAGE | | ARE REQUIRED TO BE FIRE RESISTANCE RATED (SEE BUILDING | | REVIEW COMMENTS), SHOW HOW DUCT PENETRATIONS OF RATED | | WALL ASSEMBLIES ARE TO BE PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | FBC,M 607.5 OR 607.1.1. | | | | 11. PG M2.1 DETAIL 02: EF-17 IS DISCHARGING INTO AN | | ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE. THE AIR REMOVED BY EVERY | | MECHANICAL EXHAUST SYSTEM SHALL BE DISCHARGED OUTDOORS | | AT A POINT WHERE IT WILL NOT CAUSE A NUISANCE AND FROM | | WHICH IT CANNOT AGAIN BE READILY DRAWN IN BY A | | VENTILATING SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC,M 501.2. AN | | ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE IS NOT OUTDOORS. SHOW | | COMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTTION. ALSO, SEE COMMENT #10 | | ABOVE REGARDING OPENING PROTECTION IN RATED WALL | | ASSEMBLIES. | | | | 12. PG M2.1 DETAIL 01: EF-11 (OR EF-12, ACCORDING TO | | THE FAN SCHEDULE) IS DISCHARGING INTO AN ENCLOSED | | PARKING GARAGE. THE AIR REMOVED BY EVERY MECHANICAL | | EXHAUST SYSTEM SHALL BE DISCHARGED OUTDOORS AT A POINT | | WHERE IT WILL NOT CAUSE A NUISANCE AND FROM WHICH IT | | CANNOT AGAIN BE READILY DRAWN IN BY A VENTILATING | | SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC,M 501.2. AN ENCLOSED | | PARKING GARAGE IS NOT OUTDOORS. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH | | THIS SECTTION. ALSO, SEE COMMENT #10 ABOVE REGARDING | | OPENING PROTECTION IN RATED WALL ASSEMBLIES. | | | | 13. PG M2.1 DETAIL 02: EF-13 AND EF-14, WHAT IS THE | | METHOD OF CONTROL FOR THESE FANS? ALL AIR SUPPLIED TO | | THESE SPACES SHALL BE EXHAUSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | FBC,M 403.2.1(3). THEY MAY BE INTERLOCKED WITH AHU-2, | | RUN CONTINUOUS OR BE PROVIDED WITH TRANSFER AIR FOR | | MAKE-UP OF EXHAUST. ALSO, VENTILATION SHALL BE PROVIDED | | DURING OCCUPANCY IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC,M 401.3. | | | | 14. PG M2.1 DETAIL 02: OFFICE 1.210, THERE IS NO RETURN | | SHOWN IN THE CEILING FOR THIS HABITABLE ROOM. SHOW | | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC,M 601.4. ALS, PLEASE SEE THE | | FOLLOWING COMMENT REGARDING RETURN AIR FLOW ABOVE THE | | CEILING. | | | | 15. PG M2.1 DETAILS 02 AND 04: FLOOR PLANS SHOW PLENUM | | CEILINGS WITH FREE-FLOW RETURNS BACK TO AHU'S. HOWEVER, | | WALL TYPES AS SHWON ON PG A5-D.1 AND A6.1 SHOW | | PARTITIONS FROM FLOOR TO DECK IN MOST AREAS. HOW WILL | | RETURN AIR FLOW BACK TO AHU'SWHEN BLOCKED BY | | PARTITIONS? CHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC,M 601.4. NOTE: IF | | PARTITION TYPES ARE CHANGED, DUCTS FOR EF'S 13, 14 AND | | 16 SHOULD NOT BE EXPOSED TO PLENUM IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | FBC,M 601.3. | | | | 16. PG M2.1 DETAIL 02 AND 04: AHU'S 3 AND 4 ON 1ST | | FLOOR SHARE A COMMON RETURN PLENUM AND ARE REQUIRED TO | | HAVE FAN SHUT-DOWN BY SMOKE DETECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | FBC,M 606.2.2. THE SAME CONDITION OCCURS ON 2ND FLOOR | | WITH AHU'S 5 AND 6. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTION | | IN THESE AREAS. NOTE: DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS SHALL BE | | CONNECTED TO THE BUILDING FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IF ONE IS | | REQUIRED BY CODE. FBC,M 606.4.1 | | | | 17. PG M2.1 DETAIL 03: AHU'S 1 AND 2 ARE EACH OVER 2000 | | CFM AND REQUIRE FAN SHUT-DOWN BY SMOKE DETECTOR IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBC,M 606.2.1. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH | | THIS SECTION. NOTE: DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS SHALL BE | | CONNECTED TO THE BUILDING FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IF ONE IS | | REQUIRED BY CODE. FBC,M 606.4.1 | | | | 18. PG M2.1 DETAIL 03: THE 12X10 O.A. DUCT IS PASSING | | THROUGH A TENANT SEPARATION WALL BETWEEN THE TWO | | MERCANTILE UNITS. IF THIS WALL REQURES A FIRE | | RESISTANCE RATING (SEE BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS) PLEASE | | SHOW OPENING PROTECTIVES AT THIS PENETRATION IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBC,M 607.5. | | | | 19. PG M2.1 DETAIL 03: THE 24X24 VERTICAL O.A. DUCT IS | | SHOWN PENETRATING A RATED FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLY (SEE | | BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS). SHOW THIS PENETRATION TO BE | | PROTECTED IN ACCIRDANCE WITH FBC,M 607.6. | | NOTE: COORDINATE ANY CHANGES IN FLOOR PLANS BETWEEN | | ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL DESIGNERS TO ENSURE ALL | | PENETRATIONS OF RATED ASSEMBLIES ARE PROTECTED IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBC,M SEC.607 AND FBC CH.7. | | | | 20. PG M2.1 DETAILS 02 AND 04: WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE | | O.A. BRANCH DUCTS FEEDING AHU'S 3 AND 5? HOW WILL THIS | | DUCT BE TIED TO THE AHU'S SINCE THIS IS AN OPEN RETURN | | CEILING? PROVIDE HANGING DETAIL FOR AHU'S SHOWING DUCT | | CONNECTIONS, HOW UNITS ARE HING AND ATTACHED TO | | STRUCTURE AS WELL AS THE MEANS OF AUXILIARY DRAIN | | PROTECTION. FBC,M 301.1, 307.2.3, 603.1, FBC 106.1.2 | | | | 21. PG M2.1 DETAIL 02,03,04: AHU 1-6 OUTSIDE AIR DUCTS | | FOR VENTILATION SHALL BE DESIGNED TO BE CAPABLE OF | | REDUCING THE SUPPLY OF OUTDOOR AIR TO THE MINIMUM | | VENTILATION RATES REQUIRED BY SECTION 6.1.3 OF ASHRAE | | 62. SYSTEMS MAY BE DESIGNED TO SUPPLY OUTSIDE AIR | | QUANTITIES EXCEEDING MINIMUM LEVELS, BUT THEY SHALL BE | | CAPABLE OF OPERATING AT NO MORE THAN MINIMUM LEVELS | | THROUGH THE USE OF RETURN DUCTS, MANUALLY OR | | AUTOMATICALLY OPERATED CONTROL DAMPERS, FAN VOLUME | | CONTROLS, OR OTHER DEVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC | | 13-409.1.ABC.1.1. ALSO, BOTH OUTDOOR AIR SUPPLY AND | | EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH MOTORIZED | | DAMPERS THAT WILL AUTOMATICALLY SHUT WHEN THE SYSTEMS | | OR SPACES SERVED ARE NOT IN USE. VENTILATION OUTSIDE | | AIR DAMPERS SHALL BE CAPABLE OF AUTOMATICALLY SHUTTING | | OFF DURING PREOCCUPANCY BUILDING WARMUP, COOLDOWN, AND | | SETBACK, EXCEPT WHEN VENTILATION REDUCES ENERGY COSTS | | (E.G., NIGHT PURGE) OR WHEN VENTILATION MUST BE | | SUPPLIED TO MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS. FBC | | 13-409.1.ABC.3.3. | | | | 22. PG M0.1 AND M2.1: AC SYSTEMS 1-6 SHALL BE EQUIPPED | | WITH AUTOMATIC SHUTDOWN CONTROLS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC | | 13-407.1.ABC.2.4.1. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTION. | | | | 23. PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS IN THE FORM OF AN | | APPROVED ENERGY CODE COMPLIANCE FORM IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | FBC 13-101.1.1 AND 13-103.2. | | | | 24. BUILDING CAVITIES WHICH WILL BE USED AS RETURN AIR | | PLENUMS (CEILING SPACES) SHALL BE LINED WITH AN AIR | | BARRIER AND SEALED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION | | 410.1.ABC.3.7 AND SHALL BE INSULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | SECTION 410.1.ABC.2. SEE FBC 13-410.1.ABC.3.6. | | | | 25. PG M4.1: PROVIDE WALL MOUNTING DETAIL FOR DUCTLESS | | SPLIT SYSTEMS TW-1 THROUGH TW-7, SHOWING WALL BRACKET, | | ANCHORING, REQUIRED CLEARANCES FOR SRVICE AND PROPER | | AIRFLOW AS REQUIRED BY MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBC,M 304.1 AND FBC 106.1.2. | | | | 26. PG M4.1: DETAIL 5 SHOWS A CONDENSER INSTALLED ON A | | BUILT-UP ROOF SYSTEM. THIS DETAIL IS NOT APPLICABLE TO | | THIS PROJECT. PG M1.2 6TH FL PLAN SHOWS CONDENSERS | | INSTALLED ON THE TOP LEVEL OF THE PARKING STRUCTURE. | | SHOW HOW THESE UNITS ARE TO BE SECURED TO THE STRUCTURE | | TO MEET WIND LOAD REQUIREMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC,M | | 301.13 AND FBC CH.16. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | 561.805.6719 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
10 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-10-27 |
Time |
12:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-10-27 |
Time |
12:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-10-27 12:00:58 | REVISION OK -- SHT IR-1 |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-09-24 |
Time |
16:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-09-24 |
Time |
16:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-09-24 16:49:01 | REVISION OK -- SHT P1.1. |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-07-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-07-29 |
Time |
12:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-07-29 |
Time |
12:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-07-29 12:21:02 | REVISIONS APPROVED--SHTS P1.1, P2.1 & P3.2 |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-07-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-07-14 |
Time |
14:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-07-14 |
Time |
14:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-07-14 14:55:27 | REVISIONS OK--SHTS P2.1 & P3.2 |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-06-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-06-26 |
Time |
12:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-06-26 |
Time |
12:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-06-26 12:39:23 | REVISION DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | | 1. SHT P1.1 REVISIONS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE STORM & | | CONDENSATE RISER DIAGRAMS TO REFLECT CHANGES TO THESE | | SYSTEMS. PLEASE INDICATE HOW THE CONDENSATE CONNECTS TO | | THE STORM AT COL LINE 2.1/H-J AND COL LINE 3-2.1/C-D. | | REVISIONS FOR RISER DIAGRAMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED WHEN | | SHT P1.1 SO CONNECTIONS CAN BE APPROVED WITH FLOOR PLAN | | CHANGES. SECTIONS 106.1.1, 106.1.3, 106.3.5.1.3 314.2.1 | | &1101.1. | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-06-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-06-26 |
Time |
12:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-06-18 |
Time |
12:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-06-26 12:32:31 | REVISIONS OK--SHTS P2.1 & P3.1 |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-04-01 |
Time |
14:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-04-01 |
Time |
14:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-01 14:28:12 | IRRIGATION PERMIT REQUIRED.--RPZV BACKFLOW REQUIRED | | DOWNSTREAM OF THE METER AND INSTALLED BY LICENSED | | PLUMBING CONTRACTOR. |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-02-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-02-21 |
Time |
14:35 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-02-19 |
Time |
18:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-02-21 14:38:33 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | 1. OK | | 2. OK | | 3. OK | | | | 4. SHTS IR.1 & IR.2 ARE REQUIRED TO SEALED WITH AN | | EMBOSSED TYPE SEAL THAT WILL IMPRESS ALL REQUIRED | | INFORMATION ON EACH SHEET. A STAMP SEAL IS NOT | | APPROVED. SECTION 106.1. FAC 61G1-16.001 & 61G1-16.002 | | INDICATE THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SEAL. PLEASE COMPLY. | | FS 481.306. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SEAL | | INDICATE THAT THE SEAL BE "APPROXIMATELY 2 INCHES IN | | DIAMETER". THE OLD SEALS WERE APPROXIMATELY 1-1/2" AND | | THESE ARE NOT APPROVED. | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING | | THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-12-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-12-27 |
Time |
10:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-12-26 |
Time |
16:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-12-27 10:42:05 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | 1. SHT IR.1 SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE WATER SOURCE. IF | | IT IS POTABLE WATER FROM THE CITY, SHOW THE WATER METER | | LOCATION AND THE RPZV BACKFLOW LOCATION.THE NOTE | | "CONNECT TO EXISTING SYSTEM". WHAT EXISTING SYSTEM? | | PLEASE SHOW ALL PIPING FOR THE COMPLETE SYSTEM.(METER | | 2 LOCATION IS INDICATED. IS THERE ANOTHER METER?). | | PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTIONS 106.1.1 & 106.1.2. | | | | 2. SHT IR.1 SOME INFORMATION ON THE SHEET IS NOT | | LEGIBLE. PLEASE MAKE ALL INFORMATION LEGIBLE. SECTION | | 106.1.1. | | | | 3. SHT IR.1 SHOWS CONTROLLER B,AND THE LEGEND | | INDICATES A RAIN SENSOR ONE PER EACH CONTROLLER. PLEASE | | CLARIFY. IS THERE MORE THAN ONE CONTROLLER. IF SO | | PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF EACH CONTROLLER. | | SECTION 106.1.1. | | | | 4. SHTS IR.1 & IR.2 ARE REQUIRED TO SEALED WITH AN | | EMBOSSED TYPE SEAL THAT WILL IMPRESS ALL REQUIRED | | INFORMATION ON EACH SHEET. A STAMP SEAL IS NOT | | APPROVED. SECTION 106.1. FAC 61G1-16.001 & 61G1-16.002 | | INDICATE THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SEAL. PLEASE COMPLY. | | FS 481.306. | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING | | THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-10-26 |
Time |
17:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-10-25 |
Time |
17:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-10-26 18:48:02 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | 1. SHT T-1 WHITE OUT NOT APPROVED ON SIGNED SEALED | | PLANS. SECTION 106.1.3. | | | | 2. SHT T-1 THE SHEET INDEXSHOWS SHEETS LP-0, LP-1, | | LP-2, LP-3 & IRR-1 & IRR-2, BUT THESE SHEETS WERE NOT | | SUBMITTED. PLEASE CORRELATE INDEX WITH SHEETS | | SUBMITTED. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | | 3. SURVEY SHEET. THE ADDRESS IN THE TITLE BLOCK DOES | | NOT REFLECT THE ADDRESS OF RECORD ON THE FLORIDA STATE | | DBPR WEBSITE. PLEASE UPDATE THE TITLE BLOCK OR THE DBPR | | WEBSITE PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING FOR REVIEW. FAC | | 61G1-16.004(1), 61G15-23.002(2) & FS 472.025. | | | | 4. SHT A2.1 DETAIL 05 SCUPPER SHOWS AN 8" OVERFLOW | | OPENING OPPOSITE THE SCUPPER OPENING FROM THE ROOF. | | THIS SEEMS LIKE THE WATER WILL DRAIN OUT THIS OPENING | | AS WELL AS DRAIN DOWN THE DOWNSPOUT. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | SECTION 106.1.2 & SECTION 1106. | | | | 5. SHT A5-D.2 DETAIL 01 IDENTIFY THE DETAIL. NO DETAIL | | TITLE INDICATED. WHAT IS THE DRAIN FOR? PLEASE CLARIFY. | | SECTION 106.1.1 & TABLE 1106.3. | | | | 6. SHT A9.1 DETAIL 02. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE | | FOLLOWING: | | A. 11-4.24.4 SINK DEPTH | | B. 11-4.24.5 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE | | C. 11-4.24.6 EXPOSED PIPES & SURFACES | | D. 11-4.24.7 FAUCETS | | | | 7. SHTS P1.1 & P1.2 PLANS SHALL BE DRAWN TO A MINIMUM | | 1/8TH SCALE. SECTION 106.1.3. | | | | 8. SHTS P1.1 & P1.2 SHOW ALL RWL RISER DESIGNATIONS FOR | | EACH FLOOR. THIS WILL AID IN FOLLOWING THE RISERS THRU | | THE BUILDING AND DECREASE REVIEW TIME. SECTION | | 106.1.2. | | | | 9. SHT P1.1 SHOW THE SECONDARY ROOF DRAINS/OVERFLOW | | SCUPPERS FOR THE LOWER ROOF AT THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE | | BUILDING. SECTION 1107 & ALL SUBSECTIONS. | | | | 10. SHT P1.2 DETAIL 03 SHOWS A LOWER ROOF ON THE SOUTH | | SIDE OF THE BUILDING, BUT NO PIPING IS SHOWN TO THE | | ROOF DRAINS. PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTION 106.1.1 & TABLE | | 1106.3. | | | | 11. SHT P3.2 RWL-3 MINIMUM 8" PIPE REQUIRED ON THE | | HORIZONTAL (9288SF). TABLE 1106.3. | | | | 12. SHT P3.2 RWL-2 MINIMUM 8"PIPE REQUIRED ON THE | | HORIZONTAL (9288SF). TABLE 1106.3. | | | | 13. SHT P3.2 RWL-1 MINIMUM 12"PIPE REQUIRED ON THE | | HORIZONTAL (23214SF). TABLE 1106.3. | | | | 14. SHT P3.2 RWL-1 RISER DOES NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR | | PLAN. AREA DRAINS ARE SHOWN ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE | | RISER ON THE FLOOR PLAN AND THE OFFSET AT THE BASE OF | | THE RISER IS NOT SHOWN. PLEASE CORRELATE RISER AND | | FLOOR PLAN. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | | 15. SHT P3.2 THE CONDENSATE SHALL RUN SEPARATELY TO THE | | CATCH BASIN, NOT DISCHARGE INTO THE STORM RISER | | DIAGRAM. PLEASE CONNECT THE CONDENSATE TO THE STORM. | | SECTION 1106.3 & TABLE 1106.3. | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE ALL VOID | | SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY | | ON TOP OF THE COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. THANK YOU | | FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-12-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2008-12-04 |
Time |
16:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2008-12-04 |
Time |
16:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-12-04 16:04:42 | ZONING REVIEW: PASSED | | | | ** REVISION OF ENTRY ISLANDS AT BANYAN BLVD | | | | MATT FLIS - 822-1445 |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2008-10-22 |
Time |
08:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2008-10-22 |
Time |
08:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-10-22 08:38:49 | ZONING REVIEW (FOR LANDSCAPE): PASSED | | | | MATT FLIS - 822-1445 |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-12-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2007-12-21 |
Time |
13:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2007-12-21 |
Time |
13:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-12-21 13:42:25 | ZONING REVIEW: PASSED | | | | OLD COMMENTS: | | | | 1) OK | | 2) OK - GRILLES WERE ADDED. | | 3) OK - SEPARATE PERMIT | | 4) OK - SEPARATE PERMIT | | 5) OK - ARCH INDICATED THESE WERE BELOW-GRADE UTILITY | | BOXES AND WOULD NOT INTERFERE WITH PEDESTRIAN ACCESS | | 6) OK | | 7) OK | | 8) OK | | 9) OK | | 10) OK | | 11) OK | | | | MATT FLIS - 822-1445 |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mflis |
Date |
2007-10-24 |
Time |
17:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mflis |
Date |
2007-10-24 |
Time |
17:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-10-25 08:35:45 | ZONING REVIEW: FAILED | | | | 1) PLEASE SUBMIT EXTERIOR MATERIAL AND PAINT COLOR | | SELECTIONS TO CITY FOR APPROVAL. | | 2) ON A4 - 2, DOWNTOWN ACTION COMMITTEE CHAIR REQUESTED | | A GRILLE BE USED IN ARCH INSET AREAS ABOVE STOREFRONT | | ALONG CLEMATIS (TO MATCH GRILLES ON QUADRILLE FACADE). | | ARCHITECT SAID THIS WOULD BE OK. PLEASE CONFIRM GRILLES | | WILL BE ADDED. | | 3) SIGNAGE SHALL BE REVIEWED UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. | | 4) AWNINGS SHALL BE REVIEWED UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. | | 5) METER BOXES APPEAR TO BE LOCATED IN SIDEWALK ALONG | | EASTER SIDE OF SITE. PLEASE CONFIRM AND RELOCATE | | AGAINST BUILDING SO THEY DO NOT IMPEDE PEDESTRIAN | | MOVEMENT. | | 6) BIKE RACK COUNT AND LOCATIONS SHOULD BE REVIEWED IN | | CONSULTATION WITH CITY STAFF. THESE WILL NEED TO BE | | INDICATED IN PLAN. | | 7) PARKING ADMIN OFFICES AND EQUIPMENT LOCATIONS TO BE | | REVIEWED BY S. OLLEY. PLEASE CONFIRM. | | 8) LANDSCAPE PLANS TO BE REVIEWED UPON RESUBMILLAL OF | | PERMIT. | | 9) AWNING ALONG QUADRILLE ELEVATION ONLY SHOW FROM SIDE | | VIEW ON CLEMATIS AND BANYAN ELEVATION DRAWINGS. PLEASE | | SHOWN ON QUADRILLE ELEVATION. | | 10) PLEASE CONFIRM THERE IS ENOUGH CLEARANCE FOR | | PEDESTRIANS TO EXIT/ENTER GARAGE WITHOUT WALKING IN | | DRIVE LANES ALONG CLEMATIS STREET SIDE. PLANS AND | | ELEVATIONS INDICATE APPROXIMATELY 3'-6" OF WIDTH IN PED | | PASSAGES. PLEASE CONFRIM. | | 11) DASHED LINES ARE SHOWN ABOVE ELEVATOR/STAIRS IN | | A1.2/02 - NOT SURE WHAT THIS IS SHOWNING. PLEASE | | CLARIFY. | | | | MATT FLIS - 822-1445 |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |