 |
Plan Review Details - Permit 07090648
Plan Review Stops For Permit 07090648 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
11 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-10-08 |
Time |
12:22 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-10-10 |
Time |
12:22 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2008-10-10 12:24:37 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 07090648 | | ADD: 700 S ROSEMARY AVE# 100 | | CONT: IN MOTION BUILDERS, INC. | | TEL: (954)698-0900 | | MARCH 18/2008 | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | REVISION DATED 10-08-08 REVIEW | | | | ACTION: BUILDING PROVISO | | | | 32"X32" "B" LABELED FIRE RATED DOOR LOCATED WITH | | STAIRWELL LANDING FROM RESTROOM. THIS STAIR CANNOT BE | | PART OF A VERTICAL EXIT OR EXIT PASSAGE WAY. | | 1019.1.2 PENETRATIONS. | | PENETRATIONS INTO AND OPENINGS THROUGH AN EXIT | | ENCLOSURE ARE PROHIBITED EXCEPT FOR REQUIRED EXIT | | DOORS, EQUIPMENT AND DUCTWORK NECESSARY FOR INDEPENDENT | | PRESSURIZATION, SPRINKLER PIPING, STANDPIPES, | | ELECTRICAL RACEWAY FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION | | AND ELECTRICAL RACEWAY SERVING THE EXIT ENCLOSURE AND | | TERMINATING AT A STEEL BOX NOT EXCEEDING 16 SQUARE | | INCHES (0.010 M 2 ). SUCH PENETRATIONS SHALL BE | | PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 712 . THERE SHALL | | BE NO PENETRATIONS OR COMMUNICATION OPENINGS, WHETHER | | PROTECTED OR NOT, BETWEEN ADJACENT EXIT ENCLOSURES. | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
10 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-09-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-09-30 |
Time |
14:51 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-09-30 |
Time |
14:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-10-08 07:45:05 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 07090648 | | ADD: 700 S ROSEMARY AVE# 100 | | CONT: IN MOTION BUILDERS, INC. | | TEL: (954)698-0900 | | MARCH 18/2008 | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | REVISION DATED 10-08-08 REVIEW | | | | ACTION: BUILDING PROVISO | | | | 32"X32" "B" LABELED FIRE RATED DOOR LOCATED WITH | | STAIRWELL LANDING FROM RESTROOM. THIS STAIR CANNOT BE | | PART OF A VERTICAL EXIT OR EXIT PASSAGE WAY. | | 1019.1.2 PENETRATIONS. | | PENETRATIONS INTO AND OPENINGS THROUGH AN EXIT | | ENCLOSURE ARE PROHIBITED EXCEPT FOR REQUIRED EXIT | | DOORS, EQUIPMENT AND DUCTWORK NECESSARY FOR INDEPENDENT | | PRESSURIZATION, SPRINKLER PIPING, STANDPIPES, | | ELECTRICAL RACEWAY FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION | | AND ELECTRICAL RACEWAY SERVING THE EXIT ENCLOSURE AND | | TERMINATING AT A STEEL BOX NOT EXCEEDING 16 SQUARE | | INCHES (0.010 M 2 ). SUCH PENETRATIONS SHALL BE | | PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 712 . THERE SHALL | | BE NO PENETRATIONS OR COMMUNICATION OPENINGS, WHETHER | | PROTECTED OR NOT, BETWEEN ADJACENT EXIT ENCLOSURES. | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. | 2008-09-30 14:56:33 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 07090648 | | ADD: 700 S ROSEMARY AVE# 100 | | CONT: IN MOTION BUILDERS, INC. | | TEL: (954)698-0900 | | MARCH 18/2008 | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | REVISION DATED 9-10-08 REVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | 32"X32" "B" LABELED FIRE RATED DOOR LOCATEDED WITH | | STAIRWELL LANDING FROM RESTROOM. | | 1019.1.2 PENETRATIONS. | | PENETRATIONS INTO AND OPENINGS THROUGH AN EXIT | | ENCLOSURE ARE PROHIBITED EXCEPT FOR REQUIRED EXIT | | DOORS, EQUIPMENT AND DUCTWORK NECESSARY FOR INDEPENDENT | | PRESSURIZATION, SPRINKLER PIPING, STANDPIPES, | | ELECTRICAL RACEWAY FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATION | | AND ELECTRICAL RACEWAY SERVING THE EXIT ENCLOSURE AND | | TERMINATING AT A STEEL BOX NOT EXCEEDING 16 SQUARE | | INCHES (0.010 M 2 ). SUCH PENETRATIONS SHALL BE | | PROTECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 712 . THERE SHALL | | BE NO PENETRATIONS OR COMMUNICATION OPENINGS, WHETHER | | PROTECTED OR NOT, BETWEEN ADJACENT EXIT ENCLOSURES. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
Time |
13:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
Time |
13:28 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2008-09-04 13:30:07 | SHEET S1SK-3, SK-4, SK-8 & SK-9 | | SHEET S4 SK-3-4 SK-6-7 & SK-13-14 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
Time |
13:05 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
Time |
13:05 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2008-09-04 13:07:10 | SHEET S5.0 RE-ISSUED | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-08-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-08-25 |
Time |
13:06 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-08-25 |
Time |
13:06 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2008-08-25 13:08:04 | REVISION: | | A2.1 FOR SUSPENDED CEILING HANGING DETAIL | | A6.2 SCREW ATTACHMENT FOR WOOD BUCKS |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-07-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-07-21 |
Time |
11:03 |
Rev Time |
0.77 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-07-21 |
Time |
11:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-07-21 11:05:39 | S0.0 REISSUED 5-22-08 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-05-10 |
Time |
09:54 |
Rev Time |
1.75 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-05-10 |
Time |
09:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-05-10 09:58:39 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 07090648 | | ADD: 700 S ROSEMARY AVE# 100 | | CONT: IN MOTION BUILDERS, INC. | | TEL: (954)698-0900 | | MAY 10/2008 | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | PASSED FOR INTERIOR WORK ONLY! |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-04-21 |
Time |
12:51 |
Rev Time |
3.33 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-04-21 |
Time |
12:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-28 11:18:53 | 4-25-08 | | COMMENT 1F)IN REVIEWING THIS COMMENT WITH THE | | BUILDING OFFICIAL, NEIL HAS DIRECTED THAT THIS COMMENT | | IS IRRELEVENT AND NOT BE INCLUDED IN THIS REVIEW. THE | | CBC WOULD BE ABLE TO HAVE THE CGC AS A SUB-CONTRACTOR | | AND THE ENGINEERING FIRM COULD CONTRACT WITH THE CBC . | 2008-04-21 13:15:05 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 07090648 | | ADD: 700 S ROSEMARY AVE# 100 | | CONT: IN MOTION BUILDERS, INC. | | TEL: (954)698-0900 | | MARCH 18/2008 | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | 3RDREVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | 1A)NOTE, INFORMATIONAL, WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS | | PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER LISTING THE | | ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF | | THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR | | SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND WILL | | HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR | | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | 1B) NOTE INFORMATIONAL, PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, | | PLANS, REPORTS, REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR | | SUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW FOR PERMIT. IF YOUR PROJECT WILL | | REQUIRE A RESIDENT INSPECTOR OR IF YOUR PROJECT IS A | | THRESHOLD BUILDING REQUIRING A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN | | (3) THREE SETS OF ALL SAID DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED | | FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE. 106.1* /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS | | WEST PALM BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | | 1C) NOTE INFORMATIONAL, 106.1.1* W.P.B. ADMINISTRATIVE | | CODE/2004 DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN | | INFORMATION, IN THE FORM OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO | | THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO | | CONFORMITY WITH THE TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION | | SHALL BE SPECIFIC TO THE TECHNICAL CODES "SHALL NOT BE | | CITED AS A WHOLE OR IN PART, NOR THE TERM "LEGAL" OR | | ITS EQUIVALENT BE USED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC | | INFORMATION". CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL BE | | SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE LOCATION, NATURE AND | | EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT | | WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS CODE AND | | RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS | | DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | | 1D )NOTE INFORMATIONAL, FL S S 713.13NOTICE OF | | COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT. | | NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF | | COMMENCEMENT IS NOT ACTUALLYCOMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS | | AFTER THE RECORDING THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & | | VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF | | COMMENCEMENT AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST | | INSPECTION. 2)SHEET T1.1,CODE ANALYSIS PLEASE UPDATE | | THE 2004 TO THE 2007 FBC, BUILDING WITH 2007 | | REVISIONS. | | | | 1E) PARTIALLY COMPLIED, THEEXTERIOR WORK THAT COULD | | NOT BE COMPLETED UNDER A CBC LICENSE DOES NOT ONLY | | APPLY TO THE CANOPY BUT THE EXTERIOR GLAZING AND DOOR | | SYSTEMS SINCE THE PRESSURES ASSOCIATED WITH THE DOOR | | AND WINDOW SYSTEM DO EFFECT THE STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF | | THE BUILDING. THE CGC WOULD ALSO NEED TO INCORPORATE | | THE INSTALLATION OF THE EXTERIOR COMPONENTS UNDER THE | | CGC LICENSURE. PLEASE ADD THIS WORK TO THE PERMIT | | APPLICATION UNDER THE DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT. | | | | 1F)THE SECOND LICENSING ISSUE IS THE WINGERTER | | LABORTIES THAT WILL BE COMPLETING THE THRESHOLD | | INSPECTIONS WILL NEED TO CONTRACT THROUGH THE CGC, NOT | | THE CBC, PLEASE CHANGE OUT THE WINGERTER LABORATORIES | | COVER SHEET,(3) COPIES OF RAISED SIGNED AND SEALED | | COVER SHEETS, THE MENTION OF IN MOTION BUILDERS SHOULD | | TRUELY REFLECT THE NEW CGC AND IT WOULD BE WITHIN THE | | CGC'S LICENSE SCOPE OF WORK. | | | | 2-9) COMPLIED. | | | | 10-16) COMPLIED. | | 17) ***FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & CLADDING, | | PROVIDE 2 COPIES (FOR THRESHOLD BUILDINGS (3 COPIES) OF | | PRODUCT TESTING REPORTS ,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS | | FOLLOWS: | | | | 17A-G) COMPLIED. | | | | 17H) ROOFING ASSEMBLIES W / INSULATION,NONE OF THE | | SUB-SYSTEMS WERE HIGHLIGHTED INDICATING WHICH SYSTEM | | WAS TO BE INSTALLED. 2ND ISSUE ISALL SUB-SYSTEMS WILL | | REQUIRE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS FOR THE REQUIRED ENHANCED | | FASTENING, PLEASE PROVIDE 3 COPIES OF THE ENHANCED | | FASTENING SCHEDULE FOR ZONES 2 & 3. TABLE 1609.2.1(2) * | | TABLE 1609.2.1(4). TO BE REVIEWED BY CAPRI THEN | | SUBMITTED TO THE CITY. | | | | 18-19) COMPLIED. | | | | 20) COMPLIED. | | | | 21-22) COMPLIED. | | | | 23) THIS COMMENT DIDN'T APPEAR ON THE COMMENT RESPONCE | | SHEET, SHEET A6.3 PLEASE PROVIDE PRODUCT INFORMATION ON | | THE STUCCO TAPE TO BE USED ON STC-1 WALLS? ADDITIONAL | | INFORMATION REQUIRED. | | | | 24) BUILDING PROVISO:A6.4 DETAIL # 2 & S5.0 FOR A | | BRUSHED ALUMINUM CANOPY, THIS WILL REQUIRE SHOP | | DRAWINGS, TO BE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. THIS STRUCTURE | | DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF 3105, MUST MEET THE | | 140 MPH PROVISIONS OF 1609.6.2.1(2) & 1609.2.1(4) THIS | | CAN BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW TO CAPRIFOR REVIEW THEN | | TO WPB CONSTRUCTION SEERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | | 25)COMPLIED. | | | | 26-27) COMPLIED. | | | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-03-18 |
Time |
16:30 |
Rev Time |
3.33 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-03-17 |
Time |
16:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-03-18 11:04:38 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 07090648 | | ADD: 700 S ROSEMARY AVE# 100 | | CONT: IN MOTION BUILDERS, INC. | | TEL: (954)698-0900 | | MARCH 18/2008 | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | 3RD REVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | 1A) --- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & | | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH | | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE | | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE | | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR | | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | 1B)PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, PLANS, REPORTS, | | REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR SUBMITTALS FOR | | REVIEW FOR PERMIT. IF YOUR PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A | | RESIDENT INSPECTOR OR IF YOUR PROJECT IS A THRESHOLD | | BUILDING REQUIRING A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN (3) THREE | | SETS OF ALL SAID DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PERMIT | | ISSUANCE. 106.1* /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS WEST PALM | | BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | | 1C) 106.1.1* W.P.B. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE/2004 DRAWINGS & | | SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN THE FORM | | OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, | | WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY WITH THE | | TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE SPECIFIC TO | | THE TECHNICAL CODES "SHALL NOT BE CITED AS A WHOLE OR | | IN PART, NOR THE TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS EQUIVALENT BE USED | | AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC INFORMATION". CONSTRUCTION | | DOCUMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE | | LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND | | SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS | | OF THIS CODE AND RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND | | REGULATIONS, AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | | 1D ) FL S S 713.13 NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED | | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT. NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE | | WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT IS NOT | | ACTUALLY COMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING | | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) | | THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE | | CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. 2)SHEET | | T1.1,CODE ANALYSIS PLEASE UPDATE THE 2004 TO THE 2007 | | FBC, BUILDING WITH 2007 REVISIONS. | | | | 1E) NEW COMMENT, PLANS INDICATE A NEW COVERED PATIO | | AREA BUT THE PERMIT APPLICATION | | (DUPLICATE) INDICATES ?ONLY INTERIOR WORK? WHICH IS | | CORRECT? THIS GREATLY AFFECTS THE SCOPE OF WHAT WORK | | WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED UNDER THIS PERMIT AND REVIEW. | | SINCE THE FIRST 2 REVIEWS WERE REVIEWED WITH THE | | COVERED PATIO ADDITION AS PART OF THE PERMIT SCOPE THIS | | REVIEW WILL ALSO INCLUDE THIS SAME SCOPE OF WORK. IF | | THE EXTERIOR COVERED PATIO IS NOT PART OF THIS PERMIT | | IT SHOULD NOT SHOW UP ON THE PLANS. | | | | 2-9) COMPLIED. | | | | 10) STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS WERE RESUBMITTED, | | STRUCTURAL DESIGN CALCULATIONS ARE MISSING A SIGNED AND | | SEALED INDEX SHEET INDICATING WHAT WORK IS COVERED IN | | THIS REPORT.. FL S S 471.025. | | | | 11A) COMPLIED. | | | | 11B) 3RD REQUEST FROM PREVIOUS AUDITS,*** WPB AMENDMENT | | 105.13.6. W.P.B. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | REQUEST FOR THRESHOLD BUILDINGS A SPECIAL INSPECTOR AS | | REQUIRED BY S. 553.79(5) FLORIDA STATUTES TO THE | | MINIMUM INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY THIS CODE. CONTACT | | HAROLD PISKURA MANAGER OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR PROGRAM | | AT (561) 805-6711 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION BEFORE THE | | PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED. | | | | 11C) 3RD REQUEST FROM PREVIOUS AUDITS,*** W.P.B. | | AMENDMENT 105.13.4.4 ALL PLANS FOR THE BUILDING WHICH | | ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT | | OR ENGINEER OF RECORD CONTAIN A STATEMENT THAT, TO THE | | BEST OF THE ARCHITECT'S PR ENGINEER'S KNOWLEDGE, THE | | PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE | | FIRE-SAFETY STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL | | AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION AND 633 | | FLORIDA STATUTE. | | | | 12) 3RD REQUEST FROM PREVIOUS AUDITS,*** THE STRUCTURAL | | SHEET S0.0 FOUNDATION DESIGN INDICATES THERE TO BE A | | GEOTECHNICAL SOILS ENGINEER SHALL VERIFY THAT THE SOILS | | OF THE DESIGN BEARING CAPACITY HAVE BEEN ENCOUNTERED. | | 1802.2.1 QUESTIONABLE SOIL. WHERE THE SAFE-SUSTAINING | | POWER OF THE SOIL IS IN DOUBT, OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING | | VALUE SUPERIOR TO THAT SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS | | CLAIMED, THE BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE | | NECESSARY INVESTIGATION BE MADE. SUCH INVESTIGATION | | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 1802.4 | | THROUGH 1802.6 . | | | | 13-16) COMPLIED. | | | | 17) 3RDD REQUEST FROM PREVIOUS AUDITS,*** FL BLD CODE | | 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES (FOR | | THRESHOLD BUILDINGS (3 COPIES) OF PRODUCT TESTING | | REPORTS ,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: | | | | 17A) FIXED WINDOWS, STOREFRONT, FL COVERSHEET ONLY | | SUBMITTED | | PLANS CALL FOR LARGE MISSILE IMPACT RATED GLAZING, THE | | FL# 6001.1 | | IS FOR NON-RATED SYSTEM REQUIRING STORM SHUTTERS OR | | ROLL DOWN SYSTEM | | | | 17B) GLAZED EXTERIOR SWING DOOR, SINGLE AND PAIRS FL | | COVERSHEET SUBMITTED, NON-IMPACT | | | | 17C) DOORS W/ SIDELIGHTS, FL COVERSHEET | | ONLY SUBMITTED, PLANS CALL FOR LARGE MISSILE IMPACT | | RATED GLAZING, THE FL# 7237.1 & 7237.2 IS FOR NON-RATED | | IMPACT SYSTEM REQUIRING STORM SHUTTERS OR ROLL DOWN | | SYSTEM , | | THE ROLL-DOWN SYSTEM IS NOT FOUND IN THE SECTION | | DETAILS, THERE ARE HEATERS FOUND IN SOME OF THESE | | AREAS. | | | | 17D) FOLDING DOOR SYSTEM FL COVERSHEET ONLY SUBMITTED. | | FL 6859.1 IMPACT RATED, A +/- | | 75 PSF BUT IN NON WIND BORNE DEBRIS REGION. | | | | 17D) FOLDING WALL SYSTEM FL 2947.2FL COVERSHEET | | SUBMITTED. .NANA WALL SYSTEM- FBC 2001 FBC NOT 2004FBC, | | SEE RESTRICTIONS PLANS INDICATE 13?-0? OPENINGS WITH 4 | | EQUAL PANELS, RESTRICTION SIZE IS LIMITED TO 3?-0?. SEE | | REPORT NOT SUBMITTED!!! | | | | 17E) HURRICANE SHUTTER, HORIZONTAL ROLLER, FL | | COVERSHEET ONLY SUBMITTED, PLANS INDICATE LARGE MISSILE | | ON THE EGRESS DOOR BUT THE FL NUMBERS SUBMITTED ARE FOR | | NON-RATED GLAZING BLOCKING REQUIRED EXITS WITH STORM | | SHUTTER OR ROLL DOWN SHUTTER SYSTEMS. | | | | 17F) TRUSS ANCHOR TYPE HARDWARE, FL COVERSHEET | | SUBMITTED, OK WILL USE VALUES FROM CATALOG | | NO 1/3RD STEEL INCREASES TAKEN COLUMN. | | | | 17G) LOUVER, FL COVERSHEET SUBMITTED THE REPORT NOT | | SUBMITTED WILL SHOW THIS TO BE A NON- | | RATED WALL LOUVER, SEE 1609.1.4(5). | | | | 17H) ROOFING ASSEMBLIES W / INSULATION, FL COVERSHEET | | SUBMITTED ONLY, THE REPORT NOT SUBMITTED WILL INDICATE | | THAT THIS SYSTEM IS TO BE USED FOR APPLICATION TO A | | PLYWOOD DECK. | | BOTH THE ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL SHEETS INDICATE | | THE USE OF A METAL DECK, PLEASE SEE | | PLANS FOR DETAILS. | | | | 18) 3RD REQUEST FROM PREVIOUS AUDITS,*** PRODUCT | | APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER | | OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA | | PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION PLEASE SEE THE | | STATE WEBSITE AT WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH | | STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A | | COVER SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM | | THE STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE | | APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT | | APPROVAL OR SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. | | | | 19) 3RD REQUEST FROM PREVIOUS AUDITS,*** WPB ADMIN CODE | | 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE | | REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND | | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO | | SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | FL 61G1-23.015 (2)*** THE ARCHITECT IS RESPONSIBLE FOR | | SUPERVISING AND REVIEWING ALL PROJECT DATA, REPORTS, | | SHOP DRAWINGS ETC... | | WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT | | WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED | | AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR | | TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | 20)3RD REQUEST FROM PREVIOUS AUDITS,*** SHEET EX1.1 | | INDICATES POINTS WHERE THE EXIT IS 3?-8? BUT THE WIDTH | | OF THE EGRESS PATH MAY BE AS LITTLE AS 30? IN SOME | | AREAS, PLEASE PROVIDE THE EGRESS PATH SHOWING THE FULL | | 44? WHERE IT SERVES AN OCCUPANT LOAD GREATER THAN 50 | | AND 36? WHERE REQUIRED FOR LESS THAN 50. 1024.9.1.1 THE | | MINIMUM WIDTH OF AISLES SERVING SEATING AT TABLES SHALL | | BE 44 INCHES (1118 MM). EXCEPTION: THIRTY-SIX INCHES | | (914 MM) WHERE SERVING AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF NOT MORE | | THAN 50. | | | | THERE ARE STILL AREAS ON THE EGRESS PLAN THAT WILL NOT | | MEET THE MINIMUM CLEARANCES PENCILED IN AREAS OF | | CONCERN. | | | | 21-23) COMPLIED. | | | | 24) BUILDING PROVISO: A6.4 DETAIL # 2 & S5.0 FOR A | | BRUSHED ALUMINUM CANOPY, THIS WILL REQUIRE SHOP | | DRAWINGS, TO BE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. THIS STRUCTURE | | DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF 3105, MUST MEET THE | | 140 MPH PROVISIONS OF 1609.6. | | | | 25) COMPLIED. | | | | NEW COMMENTS, 3RD REVIEW: | | | | 26) THE NEW SHEET A8.1 DOES NOT HAVE THE STAMP FROM | | CAPRI INDICATING CODE COMPLIANCE. | | | | 27) THE NEW SHEET A8.1 THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL JAMES R | | LENCIONI, ARCHITECT PUT THE EXPIRATION DATE OF HIS | | LICENSE ON THIS SHEET NOT THE DATE IT WAS DRAWN OR | | CHANGES MADE. | | | | 61G1-16.004 FL. ADMIN. CODE. PLANS PREPARED BY A | | REGISTERED ARCHITECT SHALL INCLUDE A TITLE BLOCK WHICH | | MUST: | | - STATE THE FIRM NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER | | - STATE THE FIRM LICENSE NUMBER | | - STATE PROJECT NAME OR IDENTIFICATION | | XX - STATE DATE PREPARED | | XX - INCLUDE AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND DATED SEAL - | | INCLUDE THE PRINTED NAME OF THE | | ARCHITECT SEALING THE PLANS | | | | | | | | A THOROUGH REVIEW CAN NOT BE MADE AT THIS TIME, AS A | | RESULT OF THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY APPEAR THAT WERE NOT PART OF | | THIS REVIEW. | | | | NOTE: | | *** CHAPTER 553.80(2)(B) FLORIDA STATUTES STATES THAT A | | LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE | | FEE FOR PLAN REVIEW, IF PLANS ARE REJECTED THREE OR | | MORE TIMES FOR REPEATED FAILURE TO CORRECT A CODE | | VIOLATION. | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-02-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-02-01 |
Time |
10:29 |
Rev Time |
3.33 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2008-02-01 |
Time |
09:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-02-01 10:46:36 | KONA GRILL | | 700 S ROSEMARY AVE SUITE# 100 | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 07090648 | | ADD: 700 S ROSEMARY AVE# 100 | | CONT: IN MOTION BUILDERS, INC. | | TEL: (954)698-0900 | | FEB. 01/08 | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | 2NDREVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | 1A)--- VERY IMPORTANT | | STATEMENT --- | | PLEASE DO | | NOT IGNORE! | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & | | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH | | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE | | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE | | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR | | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | 1B)PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, PLANS, REPORTS, | | REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR SUBMITTALS FOR | | REVIEW FOR PERMIT. IF YOUR PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A | | RESIDENT INSPECTOR OR IF YOUR PROJECT IS A THRESHOLD | | BUILDING REQUIRING A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN (3) THREE | | SETS OF ALL SAID DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PERMIT | | ISSUANCE. 106.1* /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTSWEST PALM | | BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | | 1C) 106.1.1* W.P.B. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE/2004 DRAWINGS & | | SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN THE FORM | | OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, | | WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY WITH THE | | TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE SPECIFIC TO | | THE TECHNICAL CODES "SHALL NOT BE CITED AS A WHOLE OR | | IN PART, NOR THE TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS EQUIVALENT BE USED | | AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC INFORMATION". CONSTRUCTION | | DOCUMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE | | LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND | | SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS | | OF THIS CODE AND RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND | | REGULATIONS, AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | | 1D ) FL S S 713.13NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED | | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT.NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE | | WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS NOT | | ACTUALLYCOMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING | | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) | | THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE | | CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. 2)SHEET | | T1.1,CODE ANALYSIS PLEASE UPDATE THE 2004 TO THE 2007 | | FBC, BUILDING WITH 2007 REVISIONS. | | | | 2-9) COMPLIED. | | | | 10) STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS WERE NOT RESUBMITTED, | | STRUCTURAL DESIGN CALCULATIONS ARE MISSING TITLE BLOCK | | INFORMATION AS WELL AS NOT HAVING AN INDEX OF HOW MANY | | SHEETS ARE IN THIS REPORT. FL S S 471.025. | | | | 11A) COMPLIED. | | | | 11B) 2ND REQUEST, WPB AMENDMENT 105.13.6. W.P.B. | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR THRESHOLD | | BUILDINGS A SPECIAL INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY S. | | 553.79(5) FLORIDA STATUTES TO THE MINIMUM INSPECTIONS | | REQUIRED BY THIS CODE. CONTACT HAROLD PISKURA MANAGER | | OF THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR PROGRAM AT (561) 805-6711 FOR | | FURTHER INFORMATION BEFORE THE PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED. | | | | 11C) 2ND REQUEST,W.P.B. AMENDMENT 105.13.4.4 ALL | | PLANS FOR THE BUILDING WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED | | AND SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD | | CONTAIN A STATEMENT THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE | | ARCHITECT'S PR ENGINEER'S KNOWLEDGE, THE PLANS AND | | SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE FIRE-SAFETY | | STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION AND 633 FLORIDA STATUTE. | | | | 12) 2ND REQUEST, THE STRUCTURAL SHEET S0.0 FOUNDATION | | DESIGN INDICATES THERE TO BE A GEOTECHNICAL SOILS | | ENGINEER SHALL VERIFY THAT THE SOILS OF THE DESIGN | | BEARING CAPACITY HAVE BEEN ENCOUNTERED. 1802.2.1 | | QUESTIONABLE SOIL. WHERE THE SAFE-SUSTAINING POWER OF | | THE SOIL IS IN DOUBT, OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING VALUE | | SUPERIOR TO THAT SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS CLAIMED, THE | | BUILDING OFFICIAL SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE NECESSARY | | INVESTIGATION BE MADE. SUCH INVESTIGATION SHALL COMPLY | | WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 1802.4 THROUGH 1802.6 | | . | | | | 13-16) COMPLIED. | | | | 17)2ND REQUEST, FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & | | CLADDING, PROVIDE 2 COPIES | | (FOR THRESHOLD BUILDINGS (3 COPIES) OF PRODUCT TESTING | | REPORTS ,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: | | 17A) FIXED WINDOWS, STOREFRONT | | 17B) GLAZED EXTERIOR SWING DOOR, SINGLE AND PAIRS 17C) | | DOORS W/ SIDELIGHTS | | 17D) FOLDING DOOR SYSTEM | | 17E) HURRICANE SHUTTER, HORIZONTAL ROLLER | | 17F) TRUSS ANCHOR TYPE HARDWARE | | 17G) LOUVER | | 17H) ROOFING ASSEMBLIES W / INSULATION | | | | 18) 2ND REQUEST, PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH | | PERMIT APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED | | TO COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR | | INFORMATION PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE | | APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A COVER | | SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE | | STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, | | SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR | | SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. | | | | 19) 2ND REQUEST, WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT | | APPROVALS. THOSE PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA | | RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY | | THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR | | JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | 20) 2ND REQUEST, SHEET EX1.1 INDICATES POINTS WHERE THE | | EXIT IS 3?-8? BUT THE WIDTH OF THE EGRESS PATH MAY BE | | AS LITTLE AS 30? IN SOME AREAS, PLEASE PROVIDE THE | | EGRESS PATH SHOWING THE FULL 44? WHERE IT SERVES AN | | OCCUPANT LOAD GREATER THAN 50 AND 36? WHERE REQUIRED | | FOR LESS THAN 50. 1024.9.1.1 THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF | | AISLES SERVING SEATING AT TABLES SHALL BE 44 INCHES | | (1118 MM). EXCEPTION: THIRTY-SIX INCHES (914 MM) WHERE | | SERVING AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF NOT MORE THAN 50. | | | | 21-23) COMPLIED. | | | | 24) BUILDING PROVISO:A6.4 DETAIL # 2 & S5.0 FOR A | | BRUSHED ALUMINUM CANOPY, THIS WILL REQUIRE SHOP | | DRAWINGS, TO BE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. THIS STRUCTURE | | DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF 3105, MUST MEET THE | | 140 MPH PROVISIONS OF 1609.6. | | | | 25) COMPLIED. | | | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | PLEASE NOTE: FLORIDA HAS A VERY BROAD PUBLIC RECORDS | | LAW. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS TO OR FROM LOCAL OFFICIALS | | REGARDING CITY BUSINESS ARE PUBLIC RECORD, AVAILABLE TO | | THE PUBLIC UPON REQUEST. YOUR E-MAIL COMMUNICATIONS ARE | | THEREFORE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE. |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-09-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-09-25 |
Time |
18:51 |
Rev Time |
4.55 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-09-25 |
Time |
18:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-09-25 21:04:28 | | | KONA GRILL | | 700 S ROSEMARY AVE SUITE# 100 | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 07090648 | | ADD: 700 S ROSEMARY AVE# 100 | | CONT: IN MOTION BUILDERS, INC. | | TEL: (954)698-0900 | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2007 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | REVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | 1A) --- VERY IMPORTANT | | STATEMENT --- | | PLEASE DO | | NOT IGNORE! | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & | | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH | | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE | | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE | | FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR | | YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | 1B)PLEASE SUBMIT 2 OF ALL SURVEYS, PLANS, REPORTS, | | REVISIONS , PRODUCT APPROVALS AND OR SUBMITTALS FOR | | REVIEW FOR PERMIT. IF YOUR PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A | | RESIDENT INSPECTOR OR IF YOUR PROJECT IS A THRESHOLD | | BUILDING REQUIRING A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR THEN (3) THREE | | SETS OF ALL SAID DOCUMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR PERMIT | | ISSUANCE. 106.1* /2004 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTSWEST PALM | | BEACH ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. | | | | 1C) 106.1.1* W.P.B. ADMINISTRATIVE CODE/2004 DRAWINGS & | | SPECIFICATIONS SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION, IN THE FORM | | OF NOTES OR OTHERWISE, AS TO THE QUALITY OF MATERIALS, | | WHERE QUALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO CONFORMITY WITH THE | | TECHNICAL CODES. SUCH INFORMATION SHALL BE SPECIFIC TO | | THE TECHNICAL CODES "SHALL NOT BE CITED AS A WHOLE OR | | IN PART, NOR THE TERM "LEGAL" OR ITS EQUIVALENT BE USED | | AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR SPECIFIC INFORMATION". CONSTRUCTION | | DOCUMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENT CLARITY TO INDICATE THE | | LOCATION, NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE WORK PROPOSED AND | | SHOW IN DETAIL THAT IT WILL CONFORM TO THE PROVISIONS | | OF THIS CODE AND RELEVANT LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES AND | | REGULATIONS, AS DETERMINED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | | 1D ) FL S S 713.13NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED | | WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT.NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE | | WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS NOT | | ACTUALLYCOMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING | | THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) | | THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE | | CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. 2)SHEET | | T1.1,CODE ANALYSIS PLEASE UPDATE THE 2004 TO THE 2007 | | FBC, BUILDING WITH 2007 REVISIONS. | | | | 3) SHEET T1.1 TYPE OF BUILDING, PLANS INDICATE THIS TO | | BE A TYPE IIB PLEASE CORRECT TO A TYPE IB, PLEASE NOTE | | THAT 700 S ROSEMARY IS CONSIDERED A MIXED USE BUILDING | | THE PARKING GARAGE IS 5 STORIES AND IS CONSIDERED PART | | OF THE MERCANTILE AND A2 RESTAURANTS FOUND IN THIS | | BUILDING. THE LOCATION OF THE ELEVATORS AND STAIRWAY | | ARE OVER 30? WIDE CREATING ONE LARGE BUILDING. | | DEFINITIONS:WALKWAY , COVERED. A ROOFED, UNOBSTRUCTED | | WALKWAY CONNECTING BUILDINGS AND USED AS A MEANS OF | | TRAVEL BY PERSONS AND WHERE LESS THAN 50 PERCENT OF THE | | PERIMETER IS ENCLOSED AND THE MAXIMUM WIDTH | | PERPENDICULAR TO THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL IS LESS THAN | | 30 FEET (9144 MM). PLEASE CORRECT THE MINIMUM BUILDING | | TYPE. | | | | 4) SHEET T1.1 SINCE THE MINIMUM BUILDING TYPE HAS | | INCREASED THE FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS WILL ALSO | | INCREASE, SEE TABLE 603. | | | | 5) SHEET T1.1 PLEASE CORRECT THE CODE ANALYSIS THIS IS | | NOT A SINGLE STORY BUILDING AND A 300% INCREASE CAN NOT | | BE TAKEN, MULTI-STORY BUILDING AND ONLY A 200% INCREASE | | CAN BE TAKEN. 506.3. | | | | 6) THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS ARE MISSING THEIR | | CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION FOR ARIA GROUP ARCHITECTS | | INC. 481.219 F.S.CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION.THE | | TITLE BLOCK FOR ANY SHEET BEARING THE NAME OF AN | | ARCHITECT PRACTICING UNDER A FICTITIOUS NAME, A | | CORPORATION, OR A PARTNERSHIP, OFFERING ARCHITECTURAL | | SERVICES, SHALL INCLUDE THE CERTIFICATE OF | | AUTHORIZATION | | NUMBER.ADD THE NUMBER TO EACH SHEET. | | | | 7) THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS IN THE TITLE BLOCK THE | | ARCHITECT OF RECORD WHICH SEALED THE PLANS HADN?T | | PLACED THE PRINTED NAME OF THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. | | 61G1-16.004FL. ADMIN. CODE.PLANS PREPARED BY A | | REGISTERED ARCHITECT SHALL INCLUDE A TITLE BLOCK WHICH | | MUST: | | - STATE THE FIRM NAME, ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE | | NUMBER | | XX- STATE THE FIRM LICENSE NUMBER | | - STATE PROJECT NAME OR IDENTIFICATION | | XX - STATE DATE PREPARED- INCLUDE AN ORIGINAL SIGNATURE | | AND DATED SEAL, IN THE SET BEING | | REVIEWED ONLY THE TOP SHEET OF THE | | ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS HAS A DATE ON THEM. | | XX - INCLUDE THE PRINTED NAME OF THE ARCHITECT SEALING | | THE PLANS. | | | | 8) SHEET S0.0 HART, GAUGLER & ASSOCIATES, INC. IS | | MISSING THEIR CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION. 471.023 | | F.S.CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION.THE TITLE BLOCK | | FOR ANY | | SHEET BEARING THE NAME OF AN ENGINEER PRACTICING UNDER | | A FICTITIOUS NAME, A CORPORATION, OR A PARTNERSHIP, | | OFFERING ENGINEERING SERVICES, SHALL INCLUDE THE | | CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER. ADD THE NUMBER TO | | EACH SHEET. | | | | 9) SHEET S0.0 THE ENGINEER OF RECORD HAS NOT: | | 61G15-23.002(2)FL. ADMIN. CODE. | | PLANS SIGNED & SEALED BY A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER SHALL | | INCLUDE EITHER THE NAME, ADDRESS AND LICENSE NUMBER OF | | THE ENGINEER OR, THE NAME AND LICENSE NUMBER OF THE | | ENGINEER AND THE NAME, ADDRESS AND CERTIFICATE OF | | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER OF THE ENGINEERING BUSINESS | | THROUGH WHICH THE ENGINEER IS PRACTICING (471.025 F.S. | | AND 471.023 F.S.). | | | | 10) STRUCTURAL DESIGN CALCULATIONS ARE MISSING TITLE | | BLOCK INFORMATION AS WELL AS NOT HAVING AN INDEX OF HOW | | MANY SHEETS ARE IN THIS REPORT. FL S S 471.025 | | | | 11) ARCHITECTURAL AS WELL AS STRUCTURAL PLANS INDICATE | | STRUCTURAL WORK TO BE ACCOMPLISHED UNDER THIS PERMIT. | | NOTE THIS BUILDING BEING A 5 STORY STRUCTURE WILL | | REQUIRE A THRESHOLD | | INSPECTION PLAN AND A THRESHOLD INSPECTOR. | | | | 11A)FL S. S. 553.71(7) " THRESHOLD BUILDING" | | MEANING ANY BUILDING WHICH IS | | GREATER THAN (3) STORIES OR 50 FT IN HEIGHT, OR WHICH | | HAS AN ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCYCLASSIFICATION AS DEFINED IN | | THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WHICH EXCEEDS 5,000 SQ FT IN | | AREA AND AN OCCUPANT CONTENT OF GREATER THAN 500 | | PERSONS. 105.13.1 THE ENFORCING AGENCY SHALL REQUIRE | | A SPECIAL INSPECTOR TO PERFORM STRUCTURAL INSPECTIONS | | ON A THRESHOLD | | BUILDING PURSUANT TO A STRUCTURALINSPECTION PLAN | | PREPARED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. THE STRUCTURAL | | INSPECTION PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THEENFORCING | | AGENCY PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR | | THE CONSTRUCTION OF A THRESHOLD BUILDING. | | THE PURPOSE OF THE STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN IS TO | | PROVIDE SPECIFIC INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND SCHEDULES SO | | THAT THE BUILDING CAN BE ADEQUATELY INSPECTED FOR | | COMPLIANCE WITH THE PERMITTED DOCUMENTS. | | | | 11B) WPB AMENDMENT 105.13.6. W.P.B. CONSTRUCTION | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR THRESHOLD BUILDINGS A | | SPECIAL INSPECTOR AS REQUIRED BY S. 553.79(5) FLORIDA | | STATUTES TO THE MINIMUM INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BY THIS | | CODE. CONTACT HAROLD PISKURA MANAGER OF THE SPECIAL | | INSPECTOR PROGRAM AT (561) 805-6711 FOR FURTHER | | INFORMATION BEFORE THE PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED. | | | | 11C)W.P.B. AMENDMENT 105.13.4.4 ALL PLANS FOR THE | | BUILDING WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY | | THE ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD CONTAIN A STATEMENT | | THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE ARCHITECT'S PR ENGINEER'S | | KNOWLEDGE, THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE | | APPLICABLE FIRE-SAFETY STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY THE | | LOCAL AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION AND 633 | | FLORIDA STATUTE. | | | | 12) THE STRUCTURAL SHEET S0.0 FOUNDATION DESIGN | | INDICATES THERE TO BE A GEOTECHNICAL SOILS ENGINEER | | SHALL VERIFY THAT THE SOILS OF THE DESIGN BEARING | | CAPACITY HAVE BEEN ENCOUNTERED. 1802.2.1 QUESTIONABLE | | SOIL. WHERE THE SAFE-SUSTAINING POWER OF THE SOIL IS IN | | DOUBT, OR WHERE A LOAD-BEARING VALUE SUPERIOR TO THAT | | SPECIFIED IN THIS CODE IS CLAIMED, THE BUILDING | | OFFICIAL SHALL REQUIRE THAT THE NECESSARY INVESTIGATION | | BE MADE. SUCH INVESTIGATION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE | | PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 1802.4 THROUGH 1802.6 . | | | | 13) S0.0 WIND DESIGN DOES NOT INDICATE IF THIS IS TAKEN | | FROM TABLE 1609.6 OR ASCE 7-02, NOTE AGAIN THIS IS A 5 | | STORY BUILDING NOT A SINGLE STORY BUILDING? | | | | 14)SHEET S0.0 INDICATES VARIOUS STANDARDS, EXAMPLE | | ACI 318 MOST RECENT EDITION, PLEASE SEE CHAPTER 35 | | WHICH LIST ALL THE STANDARDS AND YEARS THAT ARE | | REFERENCED IN THE 2004 FBC. | | | | 15) S0.0 ALSO HAS STANDARDS FOR THE HIGH VELOCITY | | HURRICANE ZONE WHICH ARE UNENFORCEABLE EXCEPT DADE & | | BROWARD COUNTIES PLEASE REMOVE. | | 16) S0.0 INSPECTIONS REQUIRED, PLEASE UPDATE TO A | | THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN AS PER FL S S 553.7(71). | | | | 17)FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & CLADDING, | | PROVIDE 2 COPIES | | (FOR THRESHOLD BUILDINGS (3 COPIES) OF PRODUCT TESTING | | REPORTS ,MISSING REPORTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: | | 17A) FIXED WINDOWS, STOREFRONT | | 17B) GLAZED EXTERIOR SWING DOOR, SINGLE AND PAIRS 17C) | | DOORS W/ SIDELIGHTS | | 17D) FOLDING DOOR SYSTEM | | 17E) HURRICANE SHUTTER, HORIZONTAL ROLLER | | 17F) TRUSS ANCHOR TYPE HARDWARE | | 17G) LOUVER | | 17H) ROOFING ASSEMBLIES W / INSULATION | | | | 18) PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT APPLICATION | | AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE | | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR INFORMATION PLEASE | | SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. | | PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | SUBMITTED WITH A COVER SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT | | IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT | | HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR | | LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE | | 9B-72. | | | | 19) WPB ADMIN CODE 106.3* PRODUCT APPROVALS. THOSE | | PRODUCT WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9B-72 SHALL BE | | REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF | | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL. | | | | 20) ) SHEET EX1.1 INDICATES POINTS WHERE THE EXIT IS | | 3?-8? BUT THE WIDTH OF THE EGRESS PATH MAY BE AS LITTLE | | AS 30? IN SOME AREAS, PLEASE PROVIDE THE EGRESS PATH | | SHOWING THE FULL 44? WHERE IT SERVES AN OCCUPANT LOAD | | GREATER THAN 50 AND 36? WHERE REQUIRED FOR LESS THAN | | 50. 1024.9.1.1 THE MINIMUM WIDTH OF AISLES SERVING | | SEATING AT TABLES SHALL BE 44 INCHES (1118 MM). | | EXCEPTION: THIRTY-SIX INCHES (914 MM) WHERE SERVING AN | | OCCUPANT LOAD OF NOT MORE THAN 50. | | | | 21) SHEET A6.2 INDICATES A NEW CANOPY WITH WOOD BEAMS | | AND DECKING. PLEASE REFER BACK TO COMMENT # 3 | | CLASSIFYING THIS BUILDING AS A TYPE 1B, SEE TABLE 601 | | ROOF CONSTRUCTION FOOTNOTE ?C?, COMBUSTIBLE | | WOOD COMPONENTS AND DECKING WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED, | | UNLESS A 4 HOUR FIRE WALL IS INTRODUCED CREATING A | | SEPARATE BUILDING. THERE MAY BE OTHER ISSUES THEN WITH | | THE MEP PLANS AS WELL AS FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE | | ALARM. | | | | 22)SHEET A6.3 INDICATES IN VARIOUS DETAILS THE USE OF | | PLYWOOD SUB-SHEATHINGWITHIN EXTERIOR NON-LOAD BEARING | | WALLS. SEE SECTION 603 .1.1(1.2)FIRE RETARDANT | | ?TREATED WOOD SHALL BE PERMITTED. | | | | 23)SHEET A6.3 PLEASE PROVIDE PRODUCT INFORMATION ON | | THE STUCCO TAPE TO BE USED ON STC-1 WALLS? ADDITIONAL | | INFORMATION REQUIRED 106.1.2. | | | | 24)BUILDING PROVISO:A6.4 DETAIL # 2 & S5.0 FOR A | | BRUSHED ALUMINUM CANOPY, THIS WILL REQUIRE SHOP | | DRAWINGS, TO BE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. THIS STRUCTURE | | DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF 3105, MUST MEET THE | | 140 MPH PROVISIONS OF 1609.6. | | | | 25) SHEET A3.1/A6.2 BOTH INDICATE A CANOPY WITH ROOF | | SLOPE AND A DETAIL WITH A CURB OF APPROXIMATELY 3?, IS | | THERE TO BE ROOF DRAINS SCUPPERS AND OR OVER FLOWS? | | ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED | | 106.1.2*/ 1503.4 & 1503.6. | | | | | | | | 102.1* WHERE, IN ANY SPECIFIC CASE, DIFFERENT SECTIONS | | OF THIS CODE SPECIFY DIFFERENT MATERIALS, METHODS OF | | CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS, THE MOST | | RESTRICTIVE SHALL GOVERN. WHERE THERE IS A CONFLICT | | BETWEEN A GENERAL REQUIREMENT AND A SPECIFIC | | REQUIREMENT, THE SPECIFIC | | REQUIREMENT SHALL BE APPLICABLE. | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
11 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-12-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-12-22 |
Time |
10:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-12-22 |
Time |
10:17 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2008-12-22 10:18:33 | REVISED PLAN, AUDITED. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
10 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-12-01 |
Time |
11:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-12-01 |
Time |
11:36 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2008-12-01 11:36:26 | ** FAILED AUDIT** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: NO COMPLIANCE AFFIDAVITS SUBMITTED. FS 553.791 | | | | | | | | | | **IMPORTANT** | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC. SHOULD BE PLACED | | INTO TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS; OR IF COMMENTS ARE NOT | | TYPED IN A CLEAR MANNER PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE TO | | CONTACT THIS REVIEWER. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
Time |
14:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
Time |
14:26 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2008-09-04 14:27:05 | REVISIONS DATED 6/19/08 SUBMITTED 8/27 |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
Time |
14:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-09-04 |
Time |
14:25 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2008-09-04 14:26:19 | REVISIONS DATED 5/30/08 SUBMITTED 8/27 |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-07-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-07-31 |
Time |
08:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-07-31 |
Time |
08:09 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2008-07-31 08:09:31 | ** DENIEDAUDIT ** | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT THE COMPLIANCE AFFIDAVITS AS | | REQUIRED UNDER FS 553.791. PLEASE SEE THAT ONLY ONE WAS | | LOCATED IN PACKAGE FOR ELECTRICAL REVISIONS DATED | | 5/30/08 HOWEVER THERE ARE ELECTRICAL REVISIONS IN SETS | | DATED 6/19/08. | | PLEASE SUBMIT ORIGINAL LETTERS. | | | | | | ** IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR IF THE COMMENTS ARE | | NOT CLEAR IN ANY MANOR PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE IN | | CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. | | | | | | IMPORTANT** | | ONCE AUDIT/REVIEWS ARE COMPLETE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP | | FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE | | ALL OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. | | DO NOT LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE AUDIT/REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID | | ANY DELAYS. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-05-16 |
Time |
08:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-05-16 |
Time |
08:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-05-12 |
Time |
13:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-05-12 |
Time |
13:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-05-12 13:11:20 | ** DENIED/TEMPORARY FAILED STATUS** | | | | 1) NOTE:ALL THREE SETS OF PLANS DO NOT CONTAIN THE | | AFFIDAVITS FOR SHEETS WHICH WERE NOT REVISED. THE NEW | | AFFIDAVITS FOR NEW REVISED SIGNED AND SEALED SHEETS | | WERE THE ONLY ONES ATTACHED TO PLANS. | | PLEASE OBTAIN THREE COMPLETE SETS OF AFFIDAVITS AND | | ATTACH TO PLANS. THIS WILL BE FOR ALL TRADES.THIS | | INFORMATION WAS FORWARDED TO OTHER TRADES ALONG WITH | | ASSISTANT BUILDING OFFICIAL MR. ROBERT BROWN. FS | | 553.791 | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SHEET F-1.1 STILL SHOWS THE WEST | | PATIO WITH FIRE SPRINKLERS WHICH ARE NOT INCLUDED IN | | SCOPE OF WORK. | | THIS WAS GIVEN TO FIRE MARSHAL AND TO ASSISTANT | | BUILDING OFFICIAL MR. ROBERT BROWN FOR CONTRACTOR TO | | OBTAIN REVISED PLANS WHICH COORDINATE WITH OTHER SHEETS | | AND PLANS IN SETS. | | | | 3) NOTE: ELECTRICAL PLANS NEED THE THIRD SET, SIGNED, | | DATED, SEALED, REVIEWED FROM PRIVATE PROVIDER ETC. | | | | | | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY | | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE | | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. | | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-04-18 |
Time |
18:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-04-18 |
Time |
18:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-18 18:21:30 | ** DENIED 4TH AUDIT ** | | | | | | ** PLEASE SEE NEW COMMENTS FOR AUDIT DUE TO COMPLETELY | | NEW DOCUMENTS NOW SUBMITTED WHICH ARE NOT THE SAME AS | | PREVIOUS SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS. | | PLEASE SEE NOTES BELOW. THESE ARE REQUIRED BY FLORIDA | | STATUES AND SHALL CORRECTED AND COMPLETE BEFORE PERMIT | | MAY BE ISSUED. | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE TO SUBMIT ALL DOCUMENTS INTO | | TWO SETS. PLEASE DO NOT SUBMIT ALL DOCUMENTS INTO ONE | | BOOK. | | FBC 106.1.3, 106.1. ADMIN SECTION OF THE FLORIDA | | BUILDING CODE FOR COORDINATION OF PLANS AND DOCUMENTS. | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW THE TWO SUBMITTED *NOTICE TO | | BUILDING OFFICIAL* LETTERS AS REQUIRED PER FS 553.791 | | ARE BOTH IN FACT *COLORED PHOTO-COPIES* AND ARE NOT | | ORIGINAL. | | PLEASE KNOW THAT ORIGINALS NOTARIZED AND COORDINATED | | WITH THE PLAN REVIEW AFFIDAVITS WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED | | DO NOT CONTAIN ANY REQUIRED STAMPS OR SIGNATURES BY THE | | PRIVATE PROVIDER AS REQUIRED PER FS 553.791. PLEASE BE | | SURE TO SUBMIT NEW ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO THE PRIVATE | | PROVIDER TO REVIEW FOR CODE COMPLIANCE WITH REVISED | | PLANS. | | PLEASE BE SURE THESE ARE COORDINATED WITH ALL SUBMITTED | | DOCUMENTS AND SUBMIT TWO COMPLETED NEW SETS OF ENERGY | | CALCULATIONS FOR MINIMUM DOCUMENTS REQUIRED PER FBC | | 106.1 | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT TWO COMPLETE SETS OF PLANS | | SHOWING THE ACCURATE SCOPE OF WORK. PLANS/SETS ARE NOT | | COMPLETE AND ARE MISSING SHEET(S). | | PLEASE SEE ONE SET CONTAINS A SHEET E2.2 WHICH WAS | | SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED BY THE ELECTRICAL ENGINEER ON | | 2/21/08. THIS SHEET ON ONE OF THE SETS IS STILL SHOWING | | THE OUTSIDE ROOF COVERED EATING AREA WHICH IS NOT ON | | OTHER SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE KNOW THAT THIS SHEET E2.2 IS NOT REVISED NOR IS | | THERE A SHEET E2.2 IN THE FIRST REVISED SET. THIS OTHER | | SET IS MISSING SHEET E2.2 ALL TOGETHER. COVER SHEET | | T1.1 CLEARLY STATES THERE SHOULD BE AN E2.2 IN BOTH | | SETS. BOTH SHOULD BE REVISED TO ACCURATELY DEPICT THE | | LATEST REVISED FLOOR PLANS ALONG WITH ELECTRICAL SCOPE | | OF WORK. | | PLEASE ALSO SEE ONE SET IS MISSING SHEET E5.1 WHICH IS | | ALSO SHOWN ON COVER SHEET T1.1. THE SECOND SET DOES | | CONTAIN THIS SHEET E5.1 WHICH WAS SIGNED, SEALED AND | | DATED 2-21-08. | | ** PLEASE COORDINATE ALL PLANS AND DOCUMENTS. | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FLORIDA STATUTES 471.025 AND | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G15-23.002 WHICH REQUIRES | | THE DESIGNER OF RECORD TO SIGN, DATE AND SEAL ALL PLANS | | RELEVANT TO THAT LICENSED DESIGNERS SCOPE OF WORK. | | PLEASE SEE THE REVISED ELECTRICAL SHEETS ARE NOW COMING | | IN WITH A COMPLETELY NEW SIGNATURE THAN THOSE SHOWN ON | | PREVIOUS PLANS AS WELL AS SOME OF THE SHEETS IN THESE | | SETS ALSO DO NOT CORRELATE. | | THIS NEW SIGNATURE DOES NOT COORDINATE WITH THE | | SIGNATURE GIVEN TO THIS OFFICE ON PREVIOUS PROJECTS BY | | SIGNATURE VERIFICATION LETTER WHICH WAS SIGNED, DATED, | | SEALED AND NOTARIZED. ALL SHEETS AND DOCUMENTS WILL NOW | | BEE RETAINED BY THIS REVIEWER. THIS OFFICE MAY HAVE NO | | CHOICE BUT TO TURN SAID PLANS AND DOCUMENTS OVER TO THE | | FLORIDA BOARD OF ENGINEERS FOR REVIEW. | | THE DESIGNER OF RECORD MAY APPEAR IN PERSON WITH PHOTO | | IDENTIFICATION TO SIGN, DATE AND SEAL REVISED PLANS | | WHICH WILL BE NEEDED AS CURRENT SHEETS ARE BEING | | RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE. | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PRIVATE PROVIDER INFORMATION | | LISTED ON THE NOTICE TO BUILDING OFFICIAL AND PRIVATE | | PROVIDER AFFIDAVIT DOES NOT CORRELATE. THE NOTICE TO | | BUILDING OFFICIAL STATES MR. MORGAN DICKINSON P.E. WITH | | AN ADDRESS LOCATED TAMPA, FLORIDA. HOWEVER THE PRIVATE | | PROVIDER AFFIDAVITS STATE THE PRIVATE PROVIDER AS MR. | | OSVALDO AREVALO P.E.. | | PLEASE COORDINATE ALL DOCUMENTS AND INFORMATION. FS | | 553.791 | | FBC 106.1, 106.3.5 ADMIN SECTION OF THE FLORIDA | | BUILDING CODE FOR MINIMUM CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS | | REQUIRED AND COORDINATION OF INFORMATION. | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE THE JURISDICTION AS LISTED ON | | THE COVER OF THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ACTUALLY LISTS THE | | JURISDICTION IN WHICH THE SCOPE OF WORK IS TAKING | | PLACE. | | PLEASE SEE THESE SHEETS LIST PALM BEACH COUNTY AND NOT | | THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH. | | 13-400.3.B, 13-415.2 | | FBC 106.1, 106.3.5 FOR COORDINATION OF CONSTRUCTION | | DOCUMENTS AND PLANS FOR RECORD. | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ALL THREE PREVIOUS AUDITS WITH | | RESPECT TO THE LIGHTING ON PLANS WHICH NEED TO | | COORDINATE WITH THE SUBMITTED INPUT DATA REPORT ON THE | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS. | | 13-400.3.B, 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2, .1.3. THE | | BELOW IS ONCE AGAIN SOME EXAMPLES OF LIGHTING WHICH IS | | LOCATED ON PLANS AND LISTED ON FIXTURE LEGEND WHICH ARE | | NOT IN THE IDR. THIS IS NOT AN EXHAUSTED LIST OF ALL | | LIGHT FIXTURES WHICH MAY NOT COORDINATE. THE AUDIT IS | | TO SHOW WHERE MINIMUM CODE COMPLIANCE IS NOT MET AND | | EXAMPLES ARE GIVEN AS A BENEFIT ONLY. | | FOR EXAMPLE: | | PLEASE SEE THE EXTERIOR LIGHTING ON THE IDR. THERE ARE | | FIXTURE LOCATIONS FOR TYPE NN FIXTURES ON WEST | | ELEVATION; THE COUNT ON PLANS IS THE SAME AS THE IDR | | HOWEVER THE VA RATING USED IN THE IDR IS LOWER THAN | | THAT STATED ON THE FIXTURE LEGEND. THE NN FIXTURE IS | | LISTED AS 50W ON LEGEND HOWEVER WITH 75W BALLAST. THE | | SHEET A2.2 WHICH IS REFERENCED IN NOTE #1 ON LIGHTING | | LEGEND SPECIFICALLY MENTIONS TO SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS | | FOR ACTUAL FIXTURES AND LOCATIONS. IF YOU GO TO SHEET | | A2.2 THE SHEET DOES SHOW FIXTURES *NN* HOWEVER THE | | ARCHITECT?S FIXTURE LEGEND SPECIFICALLY STATES THE *NN* | | FIXTURES ARE * NOT USED*. ONCE AGAIN AS STATED ON | | PREVIOUS REVIEW PLEASE COORDINATE ALL LIGHTING ON | | ARCHITECTURAL PLANS WITH THAT OF THE LIGHTING AND | | FIXTURES ON ELECTRICAL PLANS. THE PREVIOUS REVIEWS | | SPECIFICALLY GAVE CODE SECTIONS 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2 | | AND .1.3. | | THE MINIMUM INPUT REQUIRED INTO THE IDR IS THAT IF THE | | BALLAST OUTPUT, MAXIMUM FIXTURE VA RATING ETC. THIS IS | | NOT THE VA OR WATTAGE OF BULB INSTALLED IS IT THE | | MAXIMUM RATING OF A FIXTURE OR THE BALLAST OUTPUT. AN | | EXAMPLE WAS GIVEN ON PREVIOUS REVIEW. | | FOR EXAMPLE: | | PLEASE SEE THE FIXTURE LEGEND WHICH SHOWS TYPE *QQ* | | FIXTURES FOR EXTERIOR. WHAT ARE THESE? DOES THE PLANS | | OR IDR CONTAIN A MISPRINT? IF SO PLEASE ALSO SEE THE | | TYPE *QQ* FIXTURES LISTED AS EXTERIOR SCONCES ARE | | 100W/VA FIXTURES. THESE SAME FIXTURE ARE NOTED AS NOT | | USED ON SHEET A2.2 SO PLANS AND IDRDO NOT | | COORDINATE. | | FOR EXAMPLE: | | AS NOTED ABOVE FOR FIXTURES *NN* ON ARCHITECTURAL SHEET | | A2.2 WHICH WERE NOT SHOWN OR LABELED AS *NOT USED* | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THERE ARE SEVERAL FIXTURES ON | | ELECTRICAL LIGHTING PLANS SHEET E1.1 WHICH ARE NOT | | LOCATED ON SHEET A2.2. SOME OF THESE ARE FIXTURES SUCH | | AS EM8 AND EM4 ARE ON ELECTRICAL HOWEVER NOT ON | | ARCHITECTURAL. | | | | | | | | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY | | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE | | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. | | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. | | | | ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | DELAYS. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-03-12 |
Time |
18:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-03-12 |
Time |
18:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-03-12 18:06:53 | ** DENIED 3RD REVIEW ** | | | | ** PLEASE SEE SOME ITEMS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS ARE | | STILL IN NEED OF ADDRESSING.EXAMPLES WERE GIVEN ON | | PREVIOUS REVIEW HOWEVER NOT ALL ITEMS AS MENTIONED. | | PLEASE SEE SOME EXAMPLES ARE GIVEN ONCE AGAIN. | | | | ** PLEASE ALSO SEE THERE ARE SOME NEW COMMENTS BASED ON | | DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED AND/OR CHANGES MADE TO PLANS OR | | DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED. REVIEW COMMENTS CAN ONLY BE MADE | | ON PLANS AND DOCUMENTS REVIEWED. | | IN EITHER CASE THE COMMENTS NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE PLANS STILL SHOW A PERMANENT | | STRUCTURE FOR OUTSIDE EATING ON THE WEST SIDE WHICH BY | | GOING OVER WITH ERIC SCHNEIDER FROM ZONING, THIS | | STRUCTURE MAY NOT BE BUILT AS SHOWN. THIS WILL AFFECT | | ALMOST ALL DOCUMENTS AND PLANS INCLUDING ARCHITECTURAL, | | ELECTRICAL, AND PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS. | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SUBMITTED PLANS AND ALL DOCUMENTS | | WERE GONE THROUGH AND AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW | | COMMENT #1, THE OWNER AFFIDAVIT WAS NOT SUBMITTED IN | | PACKAGE. | | PLEASE SEE FS 553.791(4)( C) | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ONE SHEET OF THE PRIVATE PROVIDER | | BUILDING COMPLIANCE FOR MECHANICAL CONTAINS A NOTARY | | STAMP AND SIGNATURE OF THIS SHEET HOWEVER THE SHEET | | WHICH IS REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED BY THE REVIEWER IS NOT | | SIGNED AND IS BLANK? | | PLEASE SEE FS 553.791 AS THIS IS REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED | | BY THE PLANS EXAMINER AND A NOTARY UNDER FS 117.05 MAY | | NOT NOTARIZE A BLANK PAGE WHERE A SIGNATURE IS | | REQUIRED. | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE RESPONSE FROM THE DESIGNER FOR | | SIGNATURE MENTIONS THE TOP SIGNATURE IS THE ONE TO USE | | HOWEVER LETTER IS SIGNED WITH ANOTHER SIGNATURE ALL | | TOGETHER.THE LETTER MAY NOT LIST MULTIPLE SIGNATURES | | AND NEEDS TO STATE THIS IS THE LEGAL SIGNATURE. THE | | LETTER WILL BE PLACED IN SIGNATURE FILE. | | FS 471.025 | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COMMENTS BELOW WITH RESPECT TO | | ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLANS | | FOR LIGHTING WHICH DO NOT CORRELATE. PLEASE SEE SHEET | | A2.2 SPECIFICALLY WHICH DOES NOT SHOW THE REVISED | | LIGHTING FOR EMERGENCY LIGHTS, EXIT LIGHTS WHICH MANY | | WERE ADDED AND SOME WERE REMOVED OR RELOCATED. ONE | | EXAMPLE GIVEN: SEE THE AREA IN KITCHEN JUST TO THE LEFT | | OF THE LIQUOR STORAGE ROOM #121 WHICH ON ELECTRICAL | | PLANS THE EXIT LIGHT WAS REMOVED. | | PLEASE SEE THE NEW UPDATED ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS NOW | | CONTAIN COMPLETELY DIFFERENT SIGNATURES THAN THE | | PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED PLANS? | | PLEASE SEE THE PRINTED LICENSE NUMBER OF THE ARCHITECT | | WHICH MAY SIMPLY BE ADDED TO TITLE BLOCKS ON ANY SHEETS | | WHICH DO NOT NEED TO BE RE-PRINTED. THIS IS GIVEN AS A | | NEW COMMENT DUE TO THE A-SHEETS NOT CORRELATING WITH | | ELECTRICAL. THIS WAS A COMMENT FROM OTHER TRADES ON | | PREVIOUS REVIEW(S) AND IS GIVEN FOR INFORMATION AND IS | | REQUIRED EVEN IF COMMENT IS NOT MADE BY OTHER | | TRADE(S). | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW WITH RESPECT TO | | EGRESS LIGHTING REQUIRED TO MEET MINIMUM LEVELS PER THE | | LIFE SAFETY CODE. 7.8 AND 7.9. THE RESPONSE MENTIONS | | THIS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND | | WILL NEED TO PERFORM READINGS OF LIGHTING LEVELS AT THE | | END OF THE PROJECT. THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE AS THIS IS | | NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND IS THE | | RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. PLEASE SEE | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G15-33.004 WITH RESPECT | | TO MINIMUM RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE ENGINEER. | | IF THE LIGHTING IN AREAS OF CONCERNS WERE NOT ON | | DIMMING PANELS AND ALL A PART OF NORMAL LIGHTING AS | | SHOWN ON PLANS THIS WOULD NOT BE OF CONCERN. THEFACT | | THAT THE PLANS CONTAINS LIGHTING ON DIMMING PANELS AND | | THERE IS NO INFORMATION ON A STARTING LIGHTING LEVEL | | POINT AND NO INFORMATION ON THE MINIMUM LEVEL IN WHICH | | EGRESS LIGHTING IN ALL PATHS WILL BE DIMMED TO, THIS | | SHALL BE ADDRESSED AT THIS TIME. | | PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON LEVELS, DIMMING ETC. | | PLEASE SEE7.8.1.3, 7.8.1.4 WHICH REQUIRES 1FT CANDLE | | MINIMUM NO DESIGNATED AREA TO FALL BELOW 2.2 LUX OR .02 | | FT CANDLES WITH THE FAILURE OF ANY ONE UNIT. PLEASE SEE | | SOUTHEAST CORNER OF DINING AREA FOR ONE EXAMPLE AS THE | | LEVELS SHOWN ON PHOTO-METRIC PLANS FOR THAT AREA ARE | | ALREADY LOW AND APPEARS IT WILL FALL BELOW MINIMUM AS | | ONLY ONE UNIT IS SHOWN ON PLANS FOR THAT AREA. | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE | | WHICH MENTIONED VERSION 3.0 OF FLA-COMM COULD NOT BE | | USED WAS AS FOLLOWS AND IS QUOTED FROM DESIGNER'S | | RESPONSE: | | * | | BUILDING OFFICIALS: ENERGY GAUGE SUMMIT VERSION 3.0 AND | | 3.1 SATISFIES THE REQUIREMENTS IN 13-400.3.A AND | | 13-400.3.B (GENERATED BY FLA/COM-2004 COMPUTER PROGRAM, | | VERSION 2.5).* | | * | | PLEASE SEE THIS IS EXACTLY THE WORDING ON THE STATE | | WEBSITE. PLEASE READ WHAT THE STATEMENT SAYS, THE | | VERSION 3.0 AND 3.1 *ENERGY GAUGE SUMMIT* GENERATED BY | | THE FLA/COM 2004 COMPUTER PROGRAM, * VERSION 2.5*. | | THESE MEANS IT IS STILL THE VERSION 2.5 AS TITLED IN | | PROGRAM AND YOU WILL SEE THE ENERGY GAUGE SUMMIT 3.0 OR | | 3.1 ON THE LAST LINE OF SHEET. | | NOW THE SUBMITTED CALCULATIONS DO SHOW THE 2.5 HOWEVER | | SAYS ENERGY GAUGE SUMMIT 3.14. | | THE MECHANICAL REVIEW STATED IN THE PREVIOUS REVIEW | | THAT METHOD *B* WAS NOT AN OPTION FOR MECHANICAL REVIEW | | AND TO ADDRESS NOTE #17. | | PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS ELECTRICAL REVIEWS GAVE | | SECTIONS 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3 FOR | | PRESCRIPTIVE REQUIREMENTS. | | PLEASE SEE THAT NOT ALL LIGHTING ON PLANS COORDINATE | | WITH THE LIGHTING ON FIXTURE SCHEDULE ALONG WITH | | LIGHTING IN THE INPUT DATA REPORT. | | EXAMPLE: WOMEN AND MEN BATH ROOMS, DIMMING PANELS | | CLEARLY SHOW VANITY LIGHTING IN THESE AREAS YET NOT IN | | THE IDR. | | EXAMPLE: MECHANICAL ROOM WHICH IS NOTED AS ROOM 129 ON | | PLANS WHICH IS BEING ASSUMED AS THE ROOM WHICH IS | | LABELED AS STORAGE ON IDR. | | EXAMPLE: FIXTURE U, WHICH FIXTURE LEGEND STATES 75W | | TRANSFORMER MONO-POINT USE. | | EXAMPLE: UMBRELLA LIGHTS ON DIMMING PANEL CIRCUIT 24. | | WHAT ARE THESE FIXTURES, WHERE ARE THEY IN THE IDR, HOW | | ARE THEY FIGURED? | | THESE CALCULATIONS MAY ONLY BE FOR ELECTRICAL LIGHTING | | AND MAY NOT TRADE OFF ANY OTHER ITEMS SUCH AS BUILDING | | SYSTEMS ETC. | | THIS SECTION13-101.1.3 APPLIES TO RENOVATIONS WHICH | | THIS DOES NOT FALL UNDER AND ONLY 13-415.2 APPLIES AND | | ITS ADOPTED SECTIONS THERETO. | | PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE EFFECTIVE WATTAGE IS LESS THAN | | DESIGN AND DESIGN IS HIGHER THAN THE ALLOWANCE. PLEASE | | EXPLAIN HOW THE DESIGN WATTAGE ON COMPLIANCE SUMMARY | | SHEET IS NOT THE SAME AS DESIGN WATTAGE ON LIGHTING | | COMPLIANCE SHEET. | | PLEASE SEE SECTION ABOVE AS THIS IS NOT A TRADE OFF FOR | | OTHER COMPONENTS. | | ** AS NOTED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW, PLEASE GO OVER ALL | | LIGHTING ON PLANS, PLEASE BE SURE THE SPECIFIC | | REQUIREMENTS OF 13-415.2.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3 ARE | | MET. | | ** PLEASE SEE AS MENTIONED ON THE PREVIOUS REVIEW | | PLEASE BE SURE THE OWNER AGENT IS SIGNED ON THE | | CERTIFICATION SHEETS. THIS DOES NOT MEAN THE NAME SHALL | | BE TYPE WRITTEN ON SHEETS, THIS REQUIRES A SIGNATURE. | | PLEASE BE SURE AS MENTIONED ON PREVIOUS REVIEW THE | | CERTIFICATION SHEET CONTAINS THE SIGNATURE AND SEAL | | FROM THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL.13-103.1., FBC 106.1.2 | | ADMIN SECTION. | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE COMPLIANCE FOR 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, | | .1.2 AND .1.3 HAVE NOT BEEN ACHIEVED FOR ALL LIGHTING | | AS REQUIRED. | | THERE ARE LOCATIONS ON PLANS WHICH STILL ONLY SHOW A | | STANDARD METHOD OF CONTROL WHEN THE CODE REQUIRES | | AUTOMATED SHUT OFF. SOME AREAS WERE GIVEN AS EXAMPLES | | ON PREVIOUS REVIEW AND NOTED AS ALSO SEE OTHER AREAS. | | PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE WITH RESPECT TO SOME OF THE | | FIXTURES NOTED WHICH WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THE IDR. ONE | | FOR EXAMPLE WAS FIXTURE *P* WHICH WAS GIVEN. PLEASE SEE | | HOST AREA WHICH SHOWS FIXTURE *P* ABOVE ARE WHICH | | CONTAINS A STANDARD DIMMING SWITCH AND DOES NOT GO TO | | ANY CIRCUITING, CONTROLS, DIMMING PANEL ETC? THE PLANS | | DO CONTAIN NOTES #9 AND #10 HOWEVER THEY MENTION TO SEE | | E2.1 FOR CONTINUATION HOWEVER 2.1 DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY | | CONTROL OR CIRCUITING INFORMATION. PLEASE EXPLAIN AND | | SHOW HOW THE OCCUPANT CAN SEE ALL LIGHTING WHICH IS | | BEING CONTROLLED AS THIS PROPOSED CONTROL IS AT ONE | | LOCATION. HOW WILL SYSTEM MEET IDENTIFICATION AND PILOT | | LIGHTS REQUIRED? | | PLEASE SEE BAR RELAY PANEL MENTIONS THIS BEING A RELAY | | PANEL HOWEVER THE CIRCUITS IN THIS PANEL ARE SHOWN FROM | | PANEL L1 AND NO OVER RIDES OR TIMES COULD BE FOUND. | | EXAMPLE: PLEASE SEE PLANS STILL INDICATE LIGHTING IN | | MEN'S AND WOMEN'S BATHROOM WITH NO SEPARATE SPACE OVER | | RIDE CONTROLS. SOME LIGHTING WAS NOW PLACED ON | | OCCUPANCY SENSORS HOWEVER SEE DIMMING PANEL WHICH STILL | | LIST LIGHTS IN BOTH OF THESE LOCATIONS. | | ** PLEASE VERIFY LISTING OF MARLIN PANELS AND MATRIX | | CONTROLLERS. AS THE SYSTEM ON PLANS WAS NOT COMPLETE | | SOME RESEARCH OF SYSTEM COMPONENTS WAS DONE AND EVEN AS | | EACH MAY BE LISTED, COULD NOT LOCATE THESE AS A LISTED | | ASSEMBLY OR SYSTEM. PLEASE PROVIDE TECHNICAL SPECS/CUT | | SHEETS FOR THIS PER 110.3, 90.7. THESE ARE NOW BEING | | REQUESTED AS THE INFORMATION FOR LABELING, PILOT LIGHTS | | ETC HAS NOT BEEN CLEAR ALONG WITH CONTROLS. | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTES WITH RESPECT | | TO TRACK LIGHTING LOADS AND HOW THEY WERE FIGURED INTO | | SERVICE PER 220.43B. THE DIMMING PANELS NOW SHOW THE VA | | PER TWO FT HOWEVER THE LOADS ARE STILL SHOWN AT 1.0 | | FACTOR. ARE THESE NOT CONTINUOUS LOADS? | | 125%, 215.3, 230.42 ETC PLEASE ADJUST. | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW GAVE NOTICE TO | | FLORIDA STATUES 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO REPEAT | | COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. AT THIS TIME AS REQUIRED | | UNDER FLORIDA STATUTES, THIS OFFICE HAS ASSESSED THE | | FEE AS REQUIRED WHICH IS REQUIRED TO BE PAID BEFORE THE | | PLANS MAY BE RESUBMITTED. PLEASE BE SURE TO GO OVER | | COMMENTS, IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT | | THIS OFFICE/REVIEWER TO GO OVER COMMENTS. | | PLEASE SEE THE FEE OF $18, 600 WILL BE DUE UPON | | RESUBMITTING OF PLANS. | | ** ONE SET OF ELECTRICAL PLANS ALONG WITH ONE COPY OF | | THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED ARE BEING RETAINED BY | | THIS OFFICE. | | | | ** THIS OFFICE EXPRESSES THAT IF THERE ARE ANY | | COMMENTS, QUESTIONS OR CLARIFICATION NEEDED TO PLEASE | | DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE. | | PLEASE SEE BELOW FOR CONTACT INFORMATION. | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | DELAYS. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | 2008-03-11 19:37:58 | | | | | ** REVIEW WILL GO INTO A FAILED STATUS. NOTES TO FOLLOW | | ONCE COMPLETED. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-01-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-01-30 |
Time |
14:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-01-30 |
Time |
14:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-01-31 15:27:03 | ** NOTE ADDED ** | | 1/31 | | | | | | 1) NOTE: IT HAS BEEN CONFIRMED WITH FIRE MARSHAL THAT | | AN EXIT SIGN WILL BE REQUIRED AT DELIVERY DOOR FOR | | KITCHEN PERSONNEL. | | LS 101 7.8,7.9 | 2008-01-30 14:58:50 | ** DENIED 2ND REVIEW ** | | | | ** PLEASE SEE THERE ARE STILL SOME COMMENTS FROM | | PREVIOUS REVIEW WHICH ARE IN NEED OF ADDRESSING. | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SUBMIT THE REQUIRED FEE OWNER AFFIDAVIT | | WHICH IS REQUIRED PER FS 553.791(4)(C). | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE SIGNATURE LETTER SUBMITTED FOR THE | | ENGINEER CONTAINS TWO DIFFERENT SIGNATURES OF THE | | RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER OF RECORD. | | PLEASE SEE FS 471.025 WHICH SIGNATURE IS THE LEGAL | | ORIGINAL SIGNATURE FOR ENGINEER OF RECORD? | | PLEASE CALL TO GO OVER. | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE #17 WITH | | RESPECT TO LIGHTING ON BATH ROOMS BEING NOTED TO BE | | CONTROLLED BY DIMMING PANEL. THE RESPONSE WAS THE | | EMERGENCY LIGHT FIXTURE IS CIRCUITED TO THE HOT/LINE | | SIDE OF THE LOCAL CIRCUIT WHICH IS OK. PLEASE SEE THE | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT WAS NOT FOR THE EMERGENCY | | LIGHTING AND CIRCUITING, IT WAS FOR THE LEVELS OF | | LIGHTING UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONS. PLEASE SEE THE CODE | | SECTION WHICH WAS GIVEN ON PREVIOUS REVIEW WAS LS 101 | | 7.8 WHICH IS FOR MINIMUM LIGHTING LEVELS UNDER NORMAL | | CONDITIONS. THIS IS NOT FOR THE EMERGENCY (BATTERY BACK | | UP) LIGHT FIXTURE. | | PLEASE SEE THE LIGHTING LEVELS FOR EGRESS IN, AROUND | | AND EXITING BATHROOMS MAY NOT FALL BELOW 1FT CANDLE | | AVERAGE AT ALL EGRESS WALKING SURFACES. | | THIS COMMENT IS ALSO FOR OTHER EGRESS PATHS AS | | DESIGNATED AS GENERAL LIGHTING ON DIMMER PANEL MAY NOT | | FALL BELOW MINIMUM 1FT CANDLE LEVEL. PLEASE INDICATE | | HOW THIS IS BEING DONE. | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT # 14 WITH | | RESPECT TO LIGHTING CONTROLS REQUIRED IN SEPARATE | | SPACES AND AN EXAMPLE WAS NOTED *SUCH AS BATHROOMS*. | | THE RESPONSE MENTIONS THE PARTITIONS INSIDE THE | | BATHROOMS AND CONTROLS ARE NOT REQUIRED AS THESE | | PARTITIONS DO NOT GO ALL THE WAY TO THE CEILING. PLEASE | | SEE 13-415.1.ABC.1.1 AND .1.2. THE PREVIOUS COMMENT WAS | | NOT FOR THE STALL AREAS IN THE BATHROOMS. THIS WAS FOR | | THE *BATHROOMS* AS THEY ARE CONSIDERED SEPARATE SPACES | | FROM OTHER OPEN AREAS WITH LIGHTING CONTROLS. | | PLEASE SEE THIS AND ANY OTHER AREAS. | | PLEASE SEE THIS PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE ALSO CONTAIN A | | NOTICE ABOUT THE OCCUPANT BEING ABLE TO VISUALLY SEE | | ALL LIGHTING IN WHICH IS BEING OVER RIDDEN. PLEASE SEE | | THE RESPONSE LETTER ONLY RESPONDED TO PARTITIONS IN | | BATHROOMS. PLEASE CLARIFY HOW THE OCCUPANT FROM EACH | | OVER RIDE/ ENTRANCE LOCATION CAN VISUALLY SEE THE | | LIGHTING WHICH IS BEING CONTROLLED OR MEETING THE | | EXCEPTION IN SAME SECTION AS PREVIOUSLY NOTED. THIS | | WOULD REQUIRE PILOT LIGHTS ETC CLEARLY LABELED. | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENT # 15 WITH | | RESPECT TO CHAPTER 13 AND ENERGY CALCULATIONS | | SUBMITTED. | | PLEASE KNOW THE PREVIOUS SUBMITTED METHOD WAS *A* WHICH | | IS NOW CHANGED TO METHOD *B* WHICH IS ACCEPTABLE | | HOWEVER PLEASE SEE FBC 13-400.3.B AS THE VERSION | | SUBMITTED IS NOT THE VERSION AS ADOPTED UNDER THE FBC. | | PLEASE SEE THE SECTION AS NOTED WHICH REFERENCES | | VERSION 2.5/400.B-04R. | | PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS TO THIS SAME NOTE: | | PLEASE SEE THE INPUT DATA REPORT WILL BE NOTED AS IDR | | ON THE FOLLOWING NOTES. | | | | A) ONCE AGAIN PLEASE CORRELATE ALL LIGHTING ON PLANS | | WITH THE IDR. PLEASE SEE SOME EXAMPLES WERE GIVEN ON | | PREVIOUS REVIEW HOWEVER THEY WERE NOT ALL. | | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE: THE EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHOWN ON | | PLANS DOES NOT COORDINATE WITH THE IDR FOR EXTERIOR | | LIGHTS. PLEASE SEE FIXTURES *H*, *BB*, *EM4*, ETC. | | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE: THE FIXTURES WHICH ARE NOTED AS | | INTERIOR LIGHTING WHEN THEY ARE LOCATED OUTSIDE. HOW IS | | THIS POSSIBLE? | | PLEASE SEE THE FIXTURES NOTED AS *EM4* ON PLANS ARE | | FIXTURES USED AS PART OF THE GENERAL LIGHTING WHICH ARE | | NOT EXEMPT. | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE LIGHTING ON PLANS FOR INTERIOR | | FIXTURES DO NOT CORRELATE WITH THE IDR AND FIXTURE | | LEGEND. FOR EXAMPLE: SEE MISSING VA INPUTS FOR FIXTURES | | *P*, SEE MISSING VA REQUIRED FOR TRACK LIGHTING AS | | PREVIOUS NOTED, SEE ENTRY E1 FIXTURES AND COUNTS ON | | THESE IN HOST AREAS ETC | | | | THERE ARE SEVERAL INSTANCES ON PLANS AS NOTED WHICH | | NEED COORDINATION. PLEASE KNOW AS THE LOCATION | | DESIGNATIONS ON PLANS DO NOT CORRELATE WITH THE IDR AND | | BASED ON THE FACT NOT ALL LIGHTING IS FIGURED INTO THE | | IDR A COMPLETE REVIEW OF ALL ITEMS CAN NOT BE DONE AT | | THIS TIME.MECHANICAL ROOM, OTHER ROOM ON PLANS NEAR | | TOILET VESTIBULE NOT LABELED. | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.1.B, 13-415.2, 13-415.2.ABC.1.3, | | 13-415.2.ABC.1.2 (TRACK LIGHTING FOR LINE VOLTAGE AND | | LOW VOLTAGE) ETC. | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE CERTIFICATION SHEET CONTAINS A | | SIGNATURE FOR THE PERSON WHO *PREPARED* CALCULATIONS | | HOWEVER DOES NOT LIST ANY INFORMATION FOR THIS PERSON. | | PLEASE LIST INFORMATION AS LICENSED PE IN THE STATE OF | | FLORIDA. PLEASE SEE 13-103.1, FAC 61G15-23.002, | | FS471.025. | | THE COVER SHEET CONTAINS SIGNATURES AND SEALS FROM TOW | | OTHER DESIGNERS HOWEVER THIS INFORMATION SHOULD BE ON | | THE CERTIFICATION SHEET AS STATED. | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS NOTE #12 WITH RESPECT TO | | LOADS FOR TRACK LIGHTING. PLEASE SEE RESPONSE MENTIONS | | LOAD WAS ADDED TO PANELS ON E4.1 HOWEVER COULD NOT | | LOCATE ON PLANS, PANELS OR ANY LOAD CALCULATIONS HOW | | THESE LOADS WERE DERIVED PER 220.43B. | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FIXTURES EM4 ON SOUTH SIDE OF ENTRY | | VESTIBULE WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE CIRCUITED TO THE LOCAL | | BRANCH CIRCUIT FEEDING OTHER *Q* FIXTURES IN THAT AREA | | PER 700.12F. | | PLEASE SEE THEY ARE CURRENTLY SHOWN COMING FROM SOUTH | | PATIO CIRCUIT. | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FS 553.80(2)(B) WITH RESPECT TO | | REPEAT COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. THIS IS ONLY A | | NOTICE GIVEN AT THIS TIME. | | PLEASE KNOW ONE SET OF ELECTRICAL PLANS ALONG WITH ONE | | SET OF ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE BEING RETAINED BY THIS | | OFFICE. | | | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO ADDRESS COMMENTS. IF THERE ARE ANY | | QUESTIONS, ANY COMMENTS NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR OR | | NOT UNDERSTOOD IN ANYWAY PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE IN | | CONTACTING THIS REVIEWER. | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE PICKED UP FOR | | CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED SHEETS | | INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW AND STAMPING. DO NOT | | LEAVE ANY OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE DO NOT ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO PLANS. ANY | | ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION SUCH AS PRODUCT APPROVALS, | | SPEC/CUT SHEETS, CALCULATIONS ETC SHOULD BE PLACED INTO | | TWO SETS/FOLDERS/BINDERS ETC. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE OLD/VOIDED SHEETS | | SHOULD BE SUBMITTED FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND AVOID ANY | | DELAYS. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | 2008-01-29 20:16:33 | ON SET IN ELECTRICAL FOR REVIEW. |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-09-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-09-24 |
Time |
17:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-09-24 |
Time |
17:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-09-24 17:57:21 | 2007-09-24 17:57:21 | | | | | | ** DENIED** | | | | KONA GRILL | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE STATE THE FOLLOWING RELEVANT CODES ON | | PLANS. | | PLEASE KNOW THAT ANY PERMIT APPLICATIONS WHICH ARE | | SUBMITTED AFTER DECEMBER 8TH, 2006 PLACES PROJECTS | | UNDER THE NEW CODES ADOPTED BY THE STATE. | | PLEASE SEE THAT THIS SHALL INCLUDE 2006 REVISIONS TO | | THE 2004 FBC FOR ALL TRADES AND THE 2005 NFPA-70. | | PLEASE KNOW THERE ARE CHANGES IN THE FBC WHICH MAY | | AFFECT DESIGNS FOR ALL TRADES. | | PLEASE LIST THE FOLLOWING ON ELECTRICAL SHEETS FOR THIS | | REVIEWER AT A MINIMUM. | | 2004 FBC W/ 2006 REVISIONS | | 2005 NFPA-70 | | 2002 NFPA-72 | | 2003 NFPA-101 | | | | ** PLANS INDICATE THE 2004 FLORIDA ELECTRICAL CODE. | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING REQUIRED INFORMATION ON | | TITLE BLOCKS FOR ARCHITECTURAL FIRM. PLEASE SEE MISSING | | PRINTED INFORMATION ALONG WITH MISSING LICENSE | | INFORMATION. | | PLEASE SEE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G1-16.004. | | PLEASE ALSO SEE FLORIDA STATUES 481.219 FOR MISSING | | CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER ALSO KNOWN AS FIRM | | LICENSE NUMBER. | | PLEASE BE SURE THE PRINTED NAME IS ALSO STATED. | | ** THIS IS REQUIRED FOR ALL SHEETS WHICH CONTAIN THE | | TITLE BLOCKS FOR ARIA GROUP ARCHITECTS INC. INFORMATION | | ON REQUIREMENTS MAY ALSO BE FOUND THROUGH THE STATE OF | | FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL | | REGULATION OR FLORIDA BOARD OF ARCHITECT'S LEGAL | | COUNSEL TO THE BOARD. | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ARCHITECTURAL AND OTHER SHEETS SUCH | | AS *G* SHEETS WHICH WERE NOT DATED WHEN SIGNED AND | | SEALED. | | PLEASE SEE ONLY THE FIRST SHEET IN SET WAS SIGNED, | | DATED AND SEALED AS REQUIRED PER FS 481.221 | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS ALSO AS | | THE *S* SHEETS ARE MISSING THE REQUIRED TITLE BLOCK | | INFORMATION FOR THE ENGINEERING FIRM. | | PLEASE SEE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G15-23.002 AND | | FLORIDA STATUTES 471.023 FOR THE REQUIRED CERTIFICATE | | OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER. (ALSO KNOWN AS ENGINEERING | | BUSINESS NUMBER) | | THIS REQUIRES PRINTED NAME, PRINTED LICENSE NUMBER OF | | THE DESIGNER AS WELL. | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE ELECTRICAL SHEETS AS WELL AS ALL | | MEP SHEETS WHICH ARE MISSING REQUIRED INFORMATION ON | | TITLE BLOCKS PER THE FAC 61G15-23.002 AND FS 471.023. | | THIS IS THE SAME INFORMATION AS STATED ABOVE IN NOTE | | #4. | | TITLE BLOCKS TO INCLUDE PRINTED NAME OF DESIGNER, | | PRINTED LICENSE NUMBER AND CA/EB LICENSE NUMBER FOR | | FIRM. | | *** THIS IS REQUIRED FOR ALL MEP SHEETS WHETHER OR NOT | | COMMENT IS MADE BY OTHER TRADE(S). IF THERE ARE ANY | | QUESTIONS, PLEASE DO NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS | | OFFICE. INFORMATION ON REQUIREMENTS MAY ALSO BE FOUND | | THROUGH THE STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND | | PROFESSIONAL REGULATION OR FLORIDA BOARD OF | | PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS. | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE TO PROVIDE THE UNIT/SUITE | | NUMBER ON TITLE BLOCKS FOR PROJECT. THE BUILDING | | ADDRESS IS ALREADY ON SHEETS, HOWEVER NEEDS TO CONTAIN | | UNIT NUMBER. | | FAC 61G1-16.004, 61G15-23.002, FBC ADMINISTRATIVE | | SECTION 110.1.2, 106.1.2. | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW EVEN AS THE REQUIRED FIRE ALARM | | SYSTEM WILL BE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT THE BASE BUILD | | OUT PLANS ARE STILL REQUIRED TO SHOW THE MINIMUM | | DEVICES AND DEVICE LEVELS FOR THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | CHAPTER 11 FOR ADA. | | PLEASE SEE 11-4.28.1, .2 AND .3(4) AS THE MINIMUM | | LEVELS ARE TO BE STATED ON PLANS. | | THE SYMBOL LEGEND AND F SHEETS DO INDICATE LEVELS | | HOWEVER MANY DEVICES DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM LEVELS. | | PLEASE KNOW IF MULTIPLE LOCATIONS ARE INDEED USING A | | DEVICE WITH LESS THAN THE MINIMUM THEN PLEASE PROVIDE | | POINT BY POINT CALCULATIONS ON THE MINIMUM LIGHTING | | LEVELS FOR CANDELA LEVELS. | | PLEASE ADJUST FOR THE MINIMUM LEVELS AS REQUIRED IN | | SECTIONS ABOVE. | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE COLOR CODING AS STATED ON SHEET | | E5.1 FOR 277/480V NEEDS TO BE BROWN, PURPLE, AND | | YELLOW. | | PLEASE KNOW THE NEC ONLY PROVIDE THE IDENTIFICATION OF | | *ORANGE* FOR HIGH-LEG SYSTEMS. AS THIS SYSTEM DOES NOT | | CONTAIN A HIGH-LEG AND ALONG WITH THE FACT THE LOCAL | | COLOR CODING USED IN THIS EXISTING BUILDING IS THE | | COLOR CODING AS NOTED ABOVE ANY NEW CONDUCTORS WILL | | REQUIRE THE SAME IDENTIFICATION. PLEASE ADJUST NOTE. | | NEC 90.4. | | | | 9) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE RISER CONTAINS AN | | IDENTIFICATION AS EX FROM THE FPL TRANSFORMER TO THE | | BUILDING SERVICE MAIN. THE EX ON THE RISER NOTES | | MENTIONS THESE ARE *FEEDERS*. PLEASE CLARIFY THIS | | IDENTIFICATION AS THE CONDUCTORS AHEAD OF ANY SERVICE | | MAIN ARE IN FACT *SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUCTORS* AND | | WOULD CONTAIN IDENTIFICATION ACCORDINGLY. | | NEC 100, 215, ETC | | FBC 106.1.2 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | | 10) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE CONDUCTORS FROM THE SECONDARY | | SIDE OF THE TRANSFORMER TO THE LDP ARE NOT LARGE | | ENOUGH. | | PLEASE SEE 240.21C2, 240.4, 310.16 AND 110.14 | | ** THE CODE DOES PERMIT OVER CURRENT PROTECTION TO THE | | NEXT STANDARD AS LISTED IN 240.6 IN MANY INSTANCES | | HOWEVER NOT ON THE SECONDARY SIDE OF THE TRANSFORMERS | | AS THEY ARE REQUIRED TO TERMINATE IN OVER CURRENT | | PROTECTION WHICH LIMITS THE LOAD ON THE CONDUCTORS. | | | | 11) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PANEL *CC* WHICH IS NOTED ON RISER | | AS BEING FED BY 80AMP OVER CURRENT PROTECTION ON THE | | CIRCUIT SCHEDULE, HOWEVER THE RISER INDICATES 125AMP | | OVER CURRENT PROTECTION ON PANEL LDP WHICH DOES NOT | | CORRELATE. | | PLEASE COORDINATE AND ADJUST PLANS. | | FBC 106.1.2, 106.1.3 ADMIN FOR COORDINATION. | | | | 12) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY WHERE AND HOW TRACK LIGHTING | | LOADS FOR THE LOAD CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN FIGURED PER | | 220.43B. | | | | 13) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 210.8B2 AS PROTECTION OF ALL | | RECEPTACLES IN KITCHENS ARE REQUIRED TO CONTAIN GFCI | | PROTECTION. THIS IS FOR ALL 15 AND 20AMP RECEPTACLES | | WHETHER OR NOT THEY ARE FEEDING THE COUNTER SPACES. THE | | PLANS DO INDICATE A NOTE WHICH MENTIONS THIS HOWEVER | | THERE ARE NUMEROUS CIRCUITS ON PANEL SCHEDULES WHICH DO | | NOT INDICATE THE DESIGNATION FOR GF TYPE BREAKERS WHICH | | IS NOTED ON LEGEND ON PANEL SCHEDULE. | | PLEASE SEE SOME ARE NOTED AS GFEP FOR GROUND FAULT | | EQUIPMENT PROTECTION HOWEVER PLEASE KNOW THAT THE CLASS | | OF GROUND FAULT PROTECTION IS NOT THAT FOR EQUIPMENT | | BUT FOR PERSONNEL. | | PLEASE SEE FOR EXAMPLE A FEW CIRCUITS MISSING REQUIRED | | PROTECTION: | | KP1-16, KP1-31, KP2-22, KP2-15. THIS IS ONLY A FEW AS | | NOTED FOR EXAMPLE. | | | | 14) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING SOME INFORMATION FOR | | COMPLIANCE TO FBC CHAPTER 13. | | THERE IS NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION FOR LIGHTING CONTROLS | | AT THIS TIME. | | PLEASE SEE MISSING INFORMATION FOR LIGHTING CONTROLS OF | | MAIN DINING AREAS AND OTHER SEPARATE SPACES PER | | 13-415.1.ABC .1.1, .1.2 AND .1.3. | | PLEASE SEE SOME OCCUPANCY DEVICES ARE SHOWN FOR SOME | | AREAS AND TWO CONTACTORS ARE SHOWN FOR SOME EXTERIOR | | LIGHTING AND KITCHEN PREP AREAS HOWEVER MISSING | | INFORMATION AND CONTROLS FOR OTHER SPACES INCLUDING | | SEPARATE SPACES WHICH CONTAIN FLOOR TO CEILING HEIGHT | | PARTITIONS (BATHROOMS) AND ACCENT LIGHTING. | | PLEASE PROVIDE LOCATIONS FOR ALL DEVICES OR SYSTEMS. | | SECTION 13-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 REQUIRES THE OCCUPANT TO | | SEE THE LIGHTING IN WHICH IS BEING OVER RIDDEN OR | | CONTROLLED. THERE IS AN EXCEPTION AND IF USING THE | | EXCEPTION FOR PILOT LIGHTS ETC PLEASE INDICATE AND | | PROVIDE DETAIL. | | PLEASE PROVIDE SCHEDULING OF SYSTEM OR INFORMATION ON | | OTHER DEVICES. | | PLEASE BE SURE TO PROVIDE ALL MAXIMUM OVER RIDE TIMES | | ON OTHER DEVICES INSTALLED. THIS WAS DONE FOR THE | | DEVICES ALREADY ON PLANS. | | | | 15) NOTE: PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 13, 13-415.1.B, | | 13-415.1.C, 13-415.2. | | A)PLEASE SEE MECHANICAL REVIEW COMMENTS ALSO WITH | | RESPECT TO THE *METHOD* OF CALCULATIONS BEING | | SUBMITTED. PLEASE CLARIFY HOW *A* IS BEING USED WHEN | | THIS IS NOT A WHOLE BUILDING. | | METHOD *A* CLEARLY STATES *WHOLE BUILDING METHOD*. | | | | B) PLEASE COORDINATE ALL LIGHTING ON THE ENERGY | | CALCULATIONS SPECIFICALLY THE INPUT DATA REPORT WITH | | THE PLANS. | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1.2 FOR REQUIRED MINIMUM | | LOADS/FIGURES TO BE USED FOR TRACK LIGHTING. PLEASE SEE | | THE MINIMUM FOR LINE VOLTAGE TRACK IS BASED ON THE | | NUMBER OF FIXTURES AT THE WATTAGE OF EACH OR THE TOTAL | | LINEAR FT OF TRACK AT 30VA PER FT, WHICH EVER IS | | GREATER. | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE ANY LOW VOLTAGE TRACK IS BASED ON | | THE AVAILABLE VA OF THE TRANSFORMER. | | PLEASE BE SURE TO COMPLETE PLANS WITH ALL INFORMATION | | EACH OF THE TRANSFORMERS. | | PLEASE SEE THE PLANS SEEM TO INDICATE A *T* IN A SQUARE | | BOX FOR WHAT IS BEING ASSUMED AS THE LOW VOLTAGE | | TRANSFORMERS. PLEASE CLARIFY THIS AS THE SYMBOL LEGEND | | ON THE MEP1.0 SHEET DOES NOT CONTAIN THIS DESIGNATION. | | C) PLEASE COORDINATE ALL OTHER LIGHTING FIXTURES, | | WATTAGE AND METHOD OF CONTROLS ON THE INPUT DATA | | REPORT. THE FIXTURE LEGEND ON PLANS INDICATES A CERTAIN | | WATTAGE AND THE IDR INDICATES ANOTHER. | | EXAMPLE, PLEASE SEE TYPE N-2 FIXTURE ON E1.1 WHICH IS | | SHOWN LISTED FOR THE OFFICE, MECHANICAL ROOM AND LIQUOR | | STORAGE. THIS SAME FIXTURE N-2 IS LISTED AS 96VA/WATTS | | ON THE FIXTURE LEGEND ON SHEET E4.1, AND YET THE IDR | | LIST THIS SAME FIXTURE AS 84VA AND 64VA? PLEASE SEE TWO | | DIFFERENT VA LISTINGS FOR THE SAME FIXTURE. (MECHANICAL | | ROOM/OFFICE) | | PLEASE SEE THIS IS ONLY ONE LOCATION IN QUESTION. | | PLEASE BE SURE TO SEE PART *B* OF THIS COMMENT ABOVE AS | | THE TRACK LIGHTING LOADS ON THE CALCULATIONS WILL NEED | | ADJUSTING. | | | | D) PLEASE SEE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS SUBMITTED ARE | | REQUIRED TO FILL OUT WITH COMPLETED INFORMATION ON THE | | CERTIFICATION SHEETS ALONG WITH BEING SIGNED, DATED AND | | SEALED BY THE RESPECTIVE RESPONSIBLE DESIGNERS OF | | RECORD. | | PLEASE SEE NEITHER COPY SUBMITTED CONTAIN THIS REQUIRED | | INFORMATION ON THE *CERTIFICATION SHEET* AS REQUIRED. | | PLEASE SEE ONLY ONE COPY ACTUALLY CONTAINED ANY | | SIGNATURES AND SEALS. IN FACT THE SECOND SET OF | | CALCULATIONS WERE *PHOTO-COPIES* OF THE FIRST SET. | | PLEASE SEE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 13-101.1.1.1, FLORIDA | | ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G15-23.002 AND FLORIDA STATUTES | | 471.025. | | PLEASE ALSO BE SURE THE OWNER AGENT IS SIGNED ON | | SHEET. | | | | 16) NOTE: PLEASE PROVIDE THE MINIMUM DESIGNATED EGRESS | | PATHS AND MINIMUM PHOTO-METRIC LEVELS FOR THESE SAME | | EGRESS DESIGNATION PATHS AS REQUIRED PER NFPA-101 7.8 | | AND 7.9. | | PLEASE SEE FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE 61G15-33.004. | | FBC ADMIN SECTION106.1.2, 106.3.5.1.2 | | | | 17) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY LIGHTING NOTE #2 WITH RESPECT | | TO *DIMMING* LIGHTING IN BATHROOMS. | | LS 101 7.8. | | FBC 106.1.2 | | | | 18) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY HOW PANEL *CC* MEETS 110.26, | | 110.11, 240.24D, 110.3, 90.7. | | PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION ON CLEARANCES FOR | | EQUIPMENT AND IF THIS PANEL IS LOCATED NEAR FLOOR WHICH | | IN A KITCHEN WOULD PLACE THIS PANEL NOT ONLY IN A WET | | AREA BUT ALSO NEAR DETERIORATING FACTORS IF NOT LISTED | | FOR THE LOCATION OR ENVIRONMENT INSTALLED. | | FBC 106.1.2 ADMIN SECTION FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. | | | | 19) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY HOW THE LOAD IN THE PANEL | | SCHEDULE ON SHEET E3.1 IS LOWER THAN THE LOAD ON THE | | EQUIPMENT PLANS FOR THE SAME PANEL. | | PLEASE COORDINATE. | | 240, 408.4, 220, 215, ETC. | | FBC 106.1.2 COORDINATION. | | | | 20) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW AS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSE | | ONLY. ALL LOW VOLTAGE SYSTEMS SUCH AS PHONE, CATV, AND | | DATA ETC ARE REQUIRED TO BE UNDER SEPARATE PERMITS. THE | | PLANS MAY CONTAIN THIS LOW VOLTAGE INFORMATION AND ANY | | LV PERMIT APPLICATIONS MAY REFERENCE THE BASE PLANS | | ONCE ISSUED FOR PERMIT. | | ANY LOW VOLTAGE NOT INCLUDED ON BASE BUILD OUT PLANS | | WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PLANS. | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS PLEASE DO NOT | | HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS REVIEWER. | | | | 21) NOTE: PLEASE KNOW AS PLANS ARE *PROVIDE PROVIDER* | | STAMPED AND REVIEWED PER FS553.791, PLANS MAY NOT BE | | STAMPED WITH *REDLINES* OR *PROVISOS* FOR CONDITIONS OF | | PERMIT ISSUANCE. | | | | ** PLEASE SEE ANY POSSIBLE COMMENTS FROM OTHER TRADES | | WHICH MAY AFFECT ELECTRICAL PLANS. | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | REVIEWER. | | | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-10-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-10-16 |
Time |
13:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-10-16 |
Time |
13:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-10-16 13:22:32 | *****REVSION, PROVISO***** | | | | REVISED PLAN SHEET A1.1 STAMPED, INITIALED, AND DATED. |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-07-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-07-30 |
Time |
15:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-07-30 |
Time |
15:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-07-30 15:48:58 | REVISION DATED 5/30/08 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-05-16 |
Time |
15:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-05-16 |
Time |
15:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-05-16 15:06:14 | PLANS STAMPED, SIGNED AND DATED FOR CAPT. WILLIAMS |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-04-21 |
Time |
15:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-04-21 |
Time |
14:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-21 14:54:41 | *****PROVISO***** | | | | THE COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE PLAN REVIEWS HAVE | | BEEN ADDRESSED, HOWEVER THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEETS TO | | BE FIRE-STAMPED WHEN THE OTHER REVIEWERS HAVE BEEN | | SATISFIED. | | | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-03-19 |
Time |
18:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2008-03-19 |
Time |
17:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-03-19 17:05:58 | *****DENIED***** | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE PLAN | | REVIEW STILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED: | | | | 06.PLEASE PROVIDE FLAME SPREAD DETAILS FOR THE ENTRY | | CANOPY. | | | | 07.A DOOR NORMALLY REQUIRED TO BE KEPT CLOSED SHALL | | BE SELF-CLOSING OR AUTOMATIC CLOSING IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | 7.2.1.8.2 OF NFPA 101. | | | | 09.SPECIFY INTERIOR FINISH CLASSIFICATION FOR THE | | WALLS AND CEILINGS.INTERIOR WALL AND CEILING FINISH | | MATERIALS SHALL BE CLASS A OR CLASS B IN GENERAL | | ASSEMBLY AREA HAVING AN OCCUPANT LOADS OF MORE THAN | | 300. | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER INDICATING WHERE (ON THE APPROPIATE PLAN SHEET | | OR IN THE SPECIFICATIONS) EACH COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-02-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-02-05 |
Time |
13:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2008-02-05 |
Time |
13:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-02-05 14:00:19 | ***DENIED*** | | | | 1) OK | | | | 2) OK | | | | 3) OK | | | | 4) OK | | | | 5) OK | | | | 6) PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION FOR THIS PLAN REVIEW. | | | | 7) UNDERSTOOD. PLEASE PROVIDE APPLICABLE INFORMATION IN | | DOOR SCHEDULE. | | | | 8) OK | | | | 9) PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS COMMENT REGARDING MINIMUM | | INTERIOR FINISH CLASSIFICATION FOR WALLS AND CEILING. | | REFER TO NFPA 101, SEC. 12.3.3.3. | | | | 10) OK | | | | 11) OK | | | | 12) OK | | | | 13) OK | | | | | | MIKE WENNERGREN, ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | FIRE PREVENTION (561) 804-4756 | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-10-04 |
Time |
19:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-10-04 |
Time |
12:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-10-04 14:29:10 | *****DENIED***** | | | | | | 01.THE SUITE NUMBER SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE | | PROJECT SITE ADDRESS LOCATED IN THE TITLE BLOCK OF EACH | | SUBMITTED PLAN SHEET. | | | | 02.NFPA 101, LIFE SAFETY CODE, 2003 EDITION SHALL BE | | REFERENCED.ADD TO CODE ANALYSIS UNDER APPLICABLE | | CODES (SHEET T1.1). | | | | 03.STRUCTURES UNDERGOING CONSTRUCTION, ALTERATION, OR | | DEMOLITION OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 241. | | | | 04.COMBUSTIBLE WASTE MATERIALS, DUST, AND DEBRIS | | SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE FREQUENTLY | | AS NECESSARY FOR SAFE OPERATION. | | | | 05.ON THE APPROPIATE EXTERIOR ELEVATION WHICH FRONTS | | SOUTH ROSEMARY AVENUE, DISPLAY THE SUITE NUMBER.AS | | PER WEST PALM BEACH CODE, TENANT SPACE NUMBERS SHALL BE | | NO LESS THA 3" IN HEIGHT AND NO LESS THAN 1" IN WIDTH. | | | | 06.PLEASE PROVIDE FLAME SPREAD DETAILS FOR THE ENTRY | | CANOPY. | | | | 07.A DOOR NORMALLY REQUIRED TO BE KEPT CLOSED SHALL | | BE SELF-CLOSING OR AUTOMATIC CLOSING IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | 7.2.1.8.2 OF NFPA 101. | | | | 08.COMMERCIAL COOKING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA 96.SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMIT | | WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE HOOD INSTALLATION AS WELL AS | | THE HOOD SUPPRESSION SYSTEM. | | | | 09.SPECIFY INTERIOR FINISH CLASSIFICATION FOR THE | | WALLS AND CEILINGS.INTERIOR WALL AND CEILING FINISH | | MATERIALS SHALL BE CLASS A OR CLASS B IN GENERAL | | ASSEMBLY AREA HAVING AN OCCUPANT LOAD S OF MORE THAN | | 300. | | | | 10.SPECIFY THE INTERIOR FLOOR FINISH IN TERMS OF | | CLASS I OR CLASSII. | | | | 11.THE 2002 EDITION NFPA 13 SHALL BE BE REFERENCED | | FOR THE FIRE SPRINKLER INSTALLATION AND/RE-MODEL. | | | | 12.THE 2002 EDITION OF NFPA 72 SHALL BE REFERENCED | | FOR THE INSTALLATION/RE-MODEL OF THE FIRE ALARM | | SYSTEM. | | | | 13.AS PER LOCAL REQUIREMENTS, DUCT SMOKE DETECTORS | | SHALL INITIATE A GENERAL FIRE ALARM.AMEND FIRE ALARM | | GENERAL NOTE 6 ON SHEET F1.1 AND ALSO THE FIRE ALARM | | SEQUENCE OF OPERATIONS ON SHEET F2.1 SECTION 16C 2-3. | | | | | | TO EXPEDITE THE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS, INCLUDE A RESPONSE | | LETTER INDICATING WHERE (ON THE PLAN OR IN THE | | SPECIFICATIONS) EACH COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED | | | | CAPT. MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS | | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | 561-805-6722 |
|
|
Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-02-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-02-02 |
Time |
17:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-02-02 |
Time |
17:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-02-02 17:33:13 | REVISIONS OK -- SHTS P2.1 & P3.1. |
|
|
Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2009-01-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-01-22 |
Time |
18:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2009-01-22 |
Time |
18:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2009-01-22 18:54:51 | REVISIONS OK -- SHTS P2.1 & P3.1. |
|
|
Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-12-19 |
Time |
10:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-12-19 |
Time |
10:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-12-19 10:19:45 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | | 1. SHT P2.1 THE REVISIONS ON FILE FOR PUBLIC RECORD | | SHOW REVISIONS 07/25/07, 1, 3, 11/12/07, 4, 5, 6, | | REVISION 7 (DATED 4/7/08), 4/29/08, 5/22/08 & 9 DATED | | 5/30/08 BUT THE SHEET SUBMITTED FOR REVISION HAS | | DELETED THE REVISION NUMBERS 7 & 9 FROM THE REVISION | | INDEX AND ADDED 2 REVISION DATED 6/19/08 & 10/20/08 | | (INDICATED AS #SK-P1 BUT NOT FOUND). IN ORDER TO REVIEW | | THE REVISIONS, EACH REVISION AFTER REVISION 7 SHALL BE | | INDICATED WITH A REVISION NUMBER AND EACH REVISION | | SHALL BE CLOUDED ON THE FLOOR PLAN AND A REVISION | | NUMBER INDICATED ON EACH CLOUDED REVISION. REVISION 7 | | NUMBER SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE REVISION INDEX FOR | | DATE 4/7/08. SECTION 106.1.3. | | FBC-2004 106.1.3 QUALITY OF BUILDING PLANS. | | BUILDING PLANS SHALL BE DRAWN TO A MINIMUM 1/8 INCH | | SCALE UPON SUBSTANTIAL PAPER, CLOTH OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE | | MEDIUM. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY ESTABLISH THROUGH | | DEPARTMENTAL POLICY, STANDARDS FOR PLANS AND | | SPECIFICATIONS, IN ORDER TO PROVIDE CONFORMITY TO ITS | | RECORD RETENTION PROGRAM. THIS POLICY MAY INCLUDE SUCH | | THINGS AS MINIMUM SIZE, SHAPE, CONTRAST, CLARITY, OR | | OTHER ITEMS RELATED TO RECORDS MANAGEMENT. | | | | 2. SHT P2.1 THE GAS PIPING IS INCORRECT FOR THE 3/4" | | PIPE WITH 68 CFH. PER TABLE 402.4(1) 1" PIPE IS | | REQUIRED. -- THE GAS PIPING IS INCORRECT FOR THE 1 PIPE | | WITH 106 CFH. PER TABLE 402.4(1) 1-1/4" IS REQUIRED. | | THIS IS FOR THE GAS PIPING CHANGED AT THE PATIO | | HEATERS. | | | | 3. SHT P3.1 THE REVISIONS ON FILE FOR PUBLIC RECORD | | SHOW REVISIONS 07/25/07, 1, 3, 11/12/07, 4, 5, 6 & | | REVISION 7 (DATED 4/7/08, BUT THE SHEET SUBMITTED FOR | | REVISION HAS DELETED THE REVISION NUMBER 7 FROM THE | | REVISION INDEX AND ADDED 5 REVISIONS DATED 4/29/08, | | 5/22/08, 5/30/08, 6/19/08 & 10/20/08 (INDICATED AS | | #SK-P1 BUT NOT FOUND). IN ORDER TO REVIEW THE | | REVISIONS, EACH REVISION AFTER REVISION 7 SHALL BE | | INDICATED WITH A REVISION NUMBER AND EACH REVISION | | SHALL BE CLOUDED ON THE FLOOR PLAN AND A REVISION | | NUMBER INDICATED ON EACH CLOUDED REVISION. REVISION 7 | | NUMBER SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE REVISION INDEX FOR | | DATE 4/7/08. SECTION 106.1.3. | | FBC-2004 106.1.3 QUALITY OF BUILDING PLANS. | | BUILDING PLANS SHALL BE DRAWN TO A MINIMUM 1/8 INCH | | SCALE UPON SUBSTANTIAL PAPER, CLOTH OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE | | MEDIUM. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY ESTABLISH THROUGH | | DEPARTMENTAL POLICY, STANDARDS FOR PLANS AND | | SPECIFICATIONS, IN ORDER TO PROVIDE CONFORMITY TO ITS | | RECORD RETENTION PROGRAM. THIS POLICY MAY INCLUDE SUCH | | THINGS AS MINIMUM SIZE, SHAPE, CONTRAST, CLARITY, OR | | OTHER ITEMS RELATED TO RECORDS MANAGEMENT. | | | | 4. SHT P3.1 SHT P2.1 THE GAS PIPING IS INCORRECT FOR | | THE 3/4" PIPE WITH 68 CFH. PER TABLE 402.4(1) 1" PIPE | | IS REQUIRED. -- THE GAS PIPING IS INCORRECT FOR THE 1 | | PIPE WITH 106 CFH. PER TABLE 402.4(1) 1-1/4" IS | | REQUIRED. THIS IS FOR THE GAS PIPING CHANGED AT THE | | PATIO HEATERS. | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-05-09 |
Time |
09:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-05-09 |
Time |
09:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-06-03 10:31:30 | IF GAS PIPING TO BE WELDED, THEN THE WELDING PROCEDURE | | AND WELDERS CERTIFICATIONS ARE REQUIRED AT THE TIME OF | | APPLICATION. |
|
|
Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-01-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-01-28 |
Time |
14:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-01-28 |
Time |
14:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-23 14:21:39 | DENIED | | SEE COMMENTS ON PLUMBING REVIEW STOP |
|
|
Review Stop |
G |
GAS REVIEW |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-09-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-09-29 |
Time |
14:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-09-29 |
Time |
14:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-23 14:19:19 | DENIED | | SEE COMMENTS ON PLUMBING REVIEW STOP |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
21 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-12-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-10 |
Time |
16:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-10 |
Time |
16:30 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
2008-12-10 16:31:05 | TO "P" BOX/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
20 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-12-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-10 |
Time |
11:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-12-10 |
Time |
11:07 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2008-12-10 11:08:23 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/SUBMITTAL |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
19 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-11-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-18 |
Time |
13:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-18 |
Time |
13:15 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
2008-11-18 13:15:33 | TO "P" BOX/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
18 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-11-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-18 |
Time |
13:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-18 |
Time |
13:12 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2008-11-18 13:12:49 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
17 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-11-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-18 |
Time |
11:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-11-18 |
Time |
11:52 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2008-11-18 11:53:15 | TO "M" BOX/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
16 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-09-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-26 |
Time |
15:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-26 |
Time |
15:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-09-26 15:11:21 | TO "COMM" BD#55 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
15 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-09-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-15 |
Time |
10:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-15 |
Time |
10:16 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2008-09-15 10:16:20 | TO "JWITMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
14 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-09-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-15 |
Time |
10:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-09-15 |
Time |
10:08 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2008-09-15 10:09:09 | TO "M" BOX/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
13 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-08-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-08-28 |
Time |
08:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-08-28 |
Time |
08:48 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2008-08-28 08:49:27 | TO "ELECT" D.P. |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
12 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-08-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-08-28 |
Time |
08:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-08-28 |
Time |
08:46 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2008-08-28 08:47:51 | TO "ELECT"D.P. |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
11 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-08-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-08-28 |
Time |
08:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-08-28 |
Time |
08:40 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2008-08-28 08:41:30 | TO "BUILD" JIM W. |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
10 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-08-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-08-28 |
Time |
08:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2008-08-28 |
Time |
08:33 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2008-08-28 08:34:17 | TO "BUILD" JIM W. |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
9 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-08-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-08-14 |
Time |
16:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-08-14 |
Time |
16:06 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2008-08-14 16:06:45 | TO "JWITMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-07-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-24 |
Time |
08:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-07-24 |
Time |
08:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-07-24 08:27:41 | TO "COMM" BD#10--EXPEDITED-- |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-07-03 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
shill |
Date |
2008-07-03 |
Time |
16:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
shill |
Date |
2008-07-03 |
Time |
16:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-07-03 16:19:54 | TO "COMM" BD#17--EXPEDITED-- |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-05-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-05-16 |
Time |
09:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-05-16 |
Time |
09:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-05-16 09:12:13 | TO "COMM" BD#39/PLANS ON RACK--1 BOX***PRIVATE | | PROVIDER***3RD SET OF PLANS NEED TO BE STAMPED BY ALL | | TRADES. |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-05-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-05-07 |
Time |
11:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-05-07 |
Time |
11:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-05-07 11:58:47 | TO "COMM" BD#8**PRIVATE PROVIDER**/PLANS ON RACK--3 | | ROLLS, 3 BINDERS, 1 BOX W/2 BINDERS AND 1 FOLDER |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-04-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-17 |
Time |
08:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-04-17 |
Time |
08:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-17 08:34:29 | TO "COMM" BD#41/PLANS ON RACK--3 ROLLS, 2 BINDERS AND 1 | | LARGE FOLDER***PRIVATE PROVIDER**** |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-03-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-03-07 |
Time |
15:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-03-07 |
Time |
15:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-03-07 16:10:17 | *****PRIVATE PROVIDER**** | | | | | | TO "COMM" BD#12/PLANS ON RACK--2 ROLLS AND 1 BOX | 2008-03-04 14:35:19 | 3/3/08 WHEN PLANS ARE RESUBMITTED, PLEASE ADD LETTER | | FROM HGA STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS TO THE RESUBMITTAL | | PACKAGE.THE LETTER (DATED 2/29/08) IS WITH AISHA.RB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-01-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-01-22 |
Time |
13:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-01-22 |
Time |
13:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-01-22 13:24:20 | TO "COMM" BD#38--PRIVATE PROVIDER-- |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-10-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-10-04 |
Time |
12:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
2007-09-24 |
Time |
11:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-09-24 11:41:12 | TO "COMM" BD#43--PRIVATE PROVIDER-- |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
9 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-11-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-11-22 |
Time |
18:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-11-22 |
Time |
18:04 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2008-11-22 18:04:53 | REVISED M1.1 |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-09-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-09-24 |
Time |
15:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-09-24 |
Time |
13:09 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2008-09-24 15:22:26 | PAGES M1.1 AND M2.1 REVISED 9/9/08 |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-08-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-08-08 |
Time |
10:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-08-08 |
Time |
08:38 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2008-08-08 10:20:37 | REVISED M1.1 DATED 7/7/08 |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-05-16 |
Time |
14:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-05-16 |
Time |
14:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-05-16 14:34:16 | ALL PROPERLY SIGNED AND DATED AFFIDAVITS FOR MECHANICAL | | PAGES HAVE BEEN PROVIDED. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-05-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-05-12 |
Time |
14:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-05-12 |
Time |
13:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-05-12 14:02:47 | THE PRIVATE PROVIDER AFFIDAVIT FOR MECHANICAL PLANS | | DATED 2/21/08 ARE NOT ATTACHED TO PLANS. UPON SEARCHING | | OLD DOCUMENTATION WHICH WAS RETURNED WITH THIS | | SUBMITTAL, ONE ORIGINAL, CORRECTLY DATED AFFIDAVIT WAS | | FOUND. A SECOND ORIGINAL AFFIDAVIT IS NEEDED TO | | COMPLETE TWO IDENTICAL PERMIT SETS OF PLANS AND SATISFY | | THE AUDIT REQUIREMENTS OF FS 553.791. PER A PHONE | | CONVERSATION WITH CYNTHIA FUENTES OF CAPRI ENGINEERING, | | A SECOND AFFIDAVIT WILL BE MAILED TO THIS OFFICE IN | | ORDER TO FACILITATE A PASSED AUDIT. THIS AUDIT IS ON | | HOLD PENDING RECEIPT OF THE MISSING AFFIDAVIT AND WILL | | BE PLACED IN A TEMPORARY FAILED STATUS. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | 561.805.6719 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-04-23 |
Time |
11:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-04-23 |
Time |
10:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-23 13:57:10 | REVIEW #: 4TH | | ACTION: PASSED | | | | PLANS AND SUBMITTALS HAVE BEEN AUDITED FOR COMPLIANCE | | WITH FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS, FBC CH.1 | | AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH AND FS | | 553.791. | | | | ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS SUBMITTED WERE NOT CONSIDERED | | FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE MECHANICAL PROVISIONS OF FBCB | | CHAPTER 13. EXISTING BUILDINGS NOT MEETING THE | | DEFINITION OF A RENOVATION (FBCB 13-202) IN WHICH NEW | | HEATING, COOLING, WATER HEATING, ELECTRICAL OR LIGHTING | | SYSTEMS ARE INSTALLED ARE REQUIRED TO MEET THE BASIC | | PRESCRIPTIVE MINIMUM EFFICIENCIES LISTED IN THIS CODE | | FOR THE SYSTEM(S) BEING CHANGED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBCB | | 13-400.0.C.4. THIS REQUIREMENT HAS BEEN DEMONSTRATED ON | | THE PLANS FOR MECHANICAL SYSTEMS. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | 561.805.6719 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-03-17 |
Time |
10:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-03-17 |
Time |
09:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-03-17 10:27:52 | REVIEW #: 3RD | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | ALL PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY | | ADDRESSED. HOWEVER, REVIEW CANNOT BE PASSED AT THIS | | TIME. THESE PLANS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED UNDER THE PRIVATE | | PROVIDER PROVISIONS OF FS 553.791. AN AFFIDAVIT WAS | | SUBMITTED TO THIS DEPARTMENT FOR THE REVIEW OF THE | | MECHANICAL SHEETS AS REQUIRED BY 553.791(6). HOWEVER, | | THE AFFIDAVIT, WHILE NOTARIZED, WAS NOT SIGNED BY THE | | RESPONSIBLE PLAN REVIEWER AS REQUIRED BY THIS SECTION. | | IT IS NOT CLEAR WHAT WAS BEING NOTARIZED, SINCE THERE | | WAS NO SIGNATURE ON THE AFFIDAVIT. | | | | THIS SHEET IS BEING RETAINED BY THIS OFFICE FOR | | SUBMITTAL TO THE PROPER AUTHORITIES FOR INVESTIGATION | | AS A PROHIBITED ACT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FS 117.107(3): A | | NOTARY PUBLIC MAY NOT AFFIX HIS OR HER SIGNATURE TO A | | BLANK FORM OF AFFIDAVIT OR CERTIFICATE OF | | ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND DELIVER THAT FORM TO ANOTHER PERSON | | WITH THE INTENT THAT IT BE USED AS AN AFFIDAVIT OR | | ACKNOWLEDGMENT. | | | | PLEASE RESUBMIT PLANS WITH A CORRECTLY COMPLETED | | AFFIDAVIT FOR VERIFICATION. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | 561.805.6719 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-02-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-02-05 |
Time |
17:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2008-02-04 |
Time |
11:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-02-05 17:19:37 | REVIEW #: 2ND | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2007 SUPPLEMENTS | | FBC CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NUMBERED TO CORRESPOND WITH | | PREVIOUS REVIEW COMMENTS AS WELL AS DESIGNER'S WRITTEN | | RESPONSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONTINUITY. | | | | 1 THROUGH 5: OK | | | | 6. ACCESS PANELS MUST BE LARGE ENOUGH TO ALLOW SERVICE | | OR REPLACEMENT OF THE APPLIANCE WITHOUT REMOVING | | ELEMENTS OF PERMANENT CONSTRUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | FBC, M 306.1. ARE ACCESS PANELS LARGE ENOUGH TO ALLOW | | APPLIANCE TO BE REPLACED? THIS ITEM MAY BE COORDINATED | | WITH FIELD INSPECTOR. | | | | 7 THROUGH 9: OK | | | | 10. OK. NOTE: GREASE DUCT MANUFACTURER?S INSTALLATION | | INSTRUCTIONS ARE REQUIRED TO BE ON SITE FOR INSPECTION. | | ALSO, PROVIDE INFORMATION ON HOW THIS LISTED PRODUCT IS | | TO BE CONNECTED TO THE EXISTING GREASE DUCT IN A MANNER | | WHICH WILL MAINTAIN ITS LISTING. IS THERE A PRODUCT | | FROM THE MANUFACTURER WHICH FACILITATES THIS | | TRANSITION/CONNECTION? BASED ON A CONVERSATION WITH | | METAL-FAB, THEY MAKE SUCH A TRANSITION FOR THEIR G4 | | DUCT BUT NOT FOR THE SPECIFIED G2 DUCT. A SITE-SPECIFIC | | DETAIL IN CONJUNCTION WITH AN ENGINEERING JUDGMENT FROM | | THE MANUFACTURER MAY BE ABLE TO RESOLVE THIS ISSUE. | | THIS COULD BE A PROVISO ITEM TO BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | INSPECTION IF NECESSARY. | | | | 11. OK. THROUGH PENETRATION FIRESTOP SYSTEM UL | | INSTALLATION DETAIL MAY BE SHOWN ON PLANS OR PROVIDED | | IN FIELD FOR INSPECTION. | | | | 12. GREASE DUCT SUPPORT DETAIL #7 ON M3.1 IS NOT IN | | CONFORMANCE WITH SUPPORT DETAIL FROM MANUFACTURER?S | | INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. SUPPORTS SHALL BE IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER?S INSTALLATION | | INSTRUCTIONS AND LISTING PER FBC, M 304.1. SEE | | EXCEPTION TO FBC, M 506.3.1.1. | | | | 13 AND 14: OK | | | | 15. PRODUCT APPROVAL WITH APPROVED INSTALLATION | | INSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH PERMIT | | DOCUMENTATION. PRODUCT APPROVALS SHALL BE REVIEWED AND | | APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO | | SUBMITTAL FOR JURISDICTIONAL APPROVAL IN ACCORDANCE | | WITH FBC 106.3.3 (LOCAL AMENDMENT). | | | | 16. OK | | | | 17. THIS COMMENT WAS NOT ADDRESSED. AHU #1 STILL SHOWS | | A 3 HP MOTOR WHILE THE MODEL NUMBER OF THE APPLIANCE | | INDICATES A 5 HP MOTOR. ALSO, THE MOTOR RATINGS ON AHU4 | | AND AHU 5 ARE STILL IN EXCESS OF THE HP ALLOWED IN | | TABLE 13-410.1.1.1. THE MAXIMUM HP ALLOWED FOR THIS | | EQUIPMENT IS 1.2 HP PER 1000 CFM. THEREFORE THE MAXIMUM | | MOTOR NAMEPLATE RATING ALLOWED FOR THESE UNITS BASED ON | | THE CFM SHOWN ON THE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE WOULD BE 4.62 | | HP. PLEASE ADDRESS THIS COMMENT AND RESUBMIT. | | | | 18. METHOD B CALCULATIONS ARE NOT AN OPTION TO | | DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE FOR THIS PROJECT IN ACCORDANCE | | WITH FBC 13-400.0.C.4. HOWEVER, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF | | COMMENT #17 ABOVE, THE MATERIALS AND SYSTEMS SHOWN MEET | | THE MINIMUM PRESCRIPTIVE EFFICIENCIES REQUIRED BY THIS | | SECTION. ONCE COMMENT #17 IS ADDRESSED, CODE COMPLIANCE | | WILL HAVE BEEN DEMONSTRATED ON THE PLANS. THEREFORE, | | THE METHOD B CALCULATIONS PROVIDED WILL NOT BE REVIEWED | | IN RELATION TO MECHANICAL SYSTEMS. | | | | 19. OK. NOTE: THIS COMMENT NO LONGER APPLICABLE, SEE | | COMMENT #18 ABOVE. | | | | 20 AND 21: OK | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | RONALD J. REGUEIRO | | 561.805.6719 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-10-01 |
Time |
08:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rregueir |
Date |
2007-09-28 |
Time |
17:42 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-09-28 18:15:07 | REVIEW #: 1 | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | FBC 2004 CODE FAMILY W/ 2005 AND 2006 SUPPLEMENTS FBC | | CH.1 AS AMENDED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | 1. PG A3.1: REGARDING EQUIPMENT SUPPORT DETAIL #2, IF | | ROOFING MATERIALS EXTEND UNDER EQUIPMENT, RAISED | | EQUIPMENT SUPPORTS SHALL PROVIDE MINIMUM CLEARANCE | | HEIGHT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC TABLE 1509.7. | | | | 2. PG A3.1: WHAT IS THE HEIGHT OF EXISTING PARAPET WALL | | ADJACENT TO NEW GREASE EXHAUST FAN? THE MINIMUM | | HORIZONTAL DISTANCE BETWEEN VERTICAL DISCHARGE FANS AND | | PARAPET-TYPE BUILDING STRUCTURES SHALL BE AT LEAST 10 | | FEET UNLESS SUCH STRUCTURES ARE LOWER THAN THE TOP OF | | THE FAN DISCHARGE OPENING. IF THE FAN DISCHARGE OPENING | | IS HIGHER THAN SUCH STRUCTURE THE MINIMUM DISTANCE | | SHALL BE TWO FEET. PLEASE PROVIDE AN ELEVATION VIEW | | SHOWING THE HEIGHT OF THE FAN OUTLET AND PARAPET WALL | | AS WELL AS THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THEM TO DEMONSTRATE | | COMPLIANCE WITH FBC,M 506.5.5. | | | | 3. PG A3.1: KEY NOTE #7, ANY EXISTING STANDS MAY BE | | USED AS-IS PROVIDED THE NEW EQUIPMENT IS ATTACHED TO | | MEET WIND LOADS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC,M 301.13 AND FBC | | CH.16. HOWEVER, ANY NEW EQUIPMENT INSTALLED ON NEW | | STANDS SHALL ALSO MEET THE CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS OF | | FBC TABLE 1509.7. | | | | 4. PG M1.1: MAU-1 IS SHOWN ABOVE THE WALK-IN COOLER. | | SERVICE ACCESS FOR MAU-1 WILL BE ABOVE THE COOLER. ARE | | THE COOLER CEILING PANELS STRUCTURALLY SOUND FOR THE | | PURPOSE OF BEING A WALKING SURFACE FOR SERVICE ACCESS? | | IF SO, PROVIDE DETAIL SHOWING SAME. ALSO, IF COOLER IS | | TO SERVE A SERVICE ACCESS, GUARDS ARE REQUIRED IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBC,M 304.10. | | | | 5. PG FS-13: FREEZER/COOLER DETAIL INDICATES THIS IS | | FOR AN OUTDOOR INSTALLATION. PG M1.1 SHOWS THE | | FREEZER/COOLER INDOORS. PLEASE CLARIFY. FBC,M 304.1. | | ALSO, PG FS-13 CALLS FOR 3/4 INCH PLYWOOD IN | | FREEZER/COOLER CEILING PANELS. AS THIS BUILDING IS OF | | TYPE IB CONSTRUCTION, PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC | | 603.1. | | | | 6. PG M1.1: AHU-2 IS ABOVE A GYPSUM BOARD CEILING. | | ACCESS FOR SERVICE OR REPLACEMENT IS REQUIRED WITHOUR | | REMOVING ELEMENTS OF PERMANENT CONSTRUCTION IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBC,M 306.1. PLEASE SHOW HOW ACCESS TO | | THIS EQUIPMENT IS TO BE PROVIDED. | | | | 7. PG M1.1: AHU-3, MOTORIZED OUTDOOR AIR DAMPER IS | | LOCATED ABOVE A GYPSUM BOARD CEILING. PROVIDE ACCESS IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBC,M 306.1 AND SPECIFICATION 15A 1-18 | | ON PG M4.1. | | | | 8. SHOW LOCATION OF DUCT MOUNTED SMOKE DETECTORS ON ALL | | AHU'S TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH FBC,M 606.3. | | DETECTORS ARE TO MONITOR THE ENTIRE AIRFLOW AND BE | | ACCESSIBLE FOR INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE. | | | | 9. PROVIDE OUTDOOR AIR CALCULATIONS SHOWING OCCUPANCY | | CLASSIFICATION, OCCUPANT LOADS AND CFM REQUIRED BASED | | ON FBC,M TABLE 403.3. THIS SHOULD BE INCLUDED AS PART | | OF SIGNED AND SEALED PLANS. FBC 106.1.2. | | | | 10. PG M1.2: NOTE #20 CALLS FOR GREASE DUCT (SHOWN ON | | M1.1) TO BE PITCHED MIN. 1/4 INCH PER FOOT. WHEN | | HORIZONTAL DUCTS EXCEED 75 FEET IN LENGTH, AS THEY DO | | IN THIS APPLICATION, THE SLOPE SHALL BE NOT BE LESS | | THAN 1 INCH PER FOOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC,M 506.3.7. | | GIVEN THE DISTANCE AS SHOWN BETWEEN KEH-1 OUTLET TO THE | | RISER LOCATION (PLAN NOTE #33 ON M1.1), A RISE OF OVER | | 100 INCHES WOULD BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN THE MINIMUM | | SLOPE. PLEASE VERIFY THAT THIS IS POSSIBLE AND ADJUST | | THE DESIGN, IF NECESSARY, TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THIS | | SECTION. | | | | 11. PG M1.2: CHILLED WATER PIPE PENETRATIONS OF FIRE | | RESISTANCE RATED WALL ASSEMBLY ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | PROTECTED WITH A THROUGH-PENETRATION FIRESTOP SYSTEM IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBC SEC.712. PROVIDE DETAIL WHICH | | CORRESPONDS WITH THE LISTED ASSEMBLY TO BE USED. | | | | 12. PG M3.1: PROVIDE DETAIL SHOWING HOW GREASE DUCTS | | ARE TO BE SUPPORTED, INCLUDING ATTACHMENTS TO | | STRUCTURE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC,M 506.3.3 AND FBC | | 106.1.2. | | | | 13. TYPE I HOODS SHALL BE SECURED IN PLACE BY | | NONCOMBUSTIBLE SUPPORTS. ALL TYPE I AND TYPE II HOOD | | SUPPORTS SHALL BE ADEQUATE FOR THE APPLIED LOAD OF THE | | HOOD, THE UNSUPPORTED DUCTWORK, THE EFFLUENT LOADING, | | AND THE POSSIBLE WEIGHT OF PERSONNEL WORKING IN OR ON | | THE HOOD. PROVIDE DETAIL FOR SUPPORTS ON TYPE I AND | | TYPE II HOODS. FBC,M 507.6 | | | | 14. PG M3.1: DETAIL 5 INDICATES "PREFABRICATED | | EQUIPMENT SUPPORT RAILS." ANY PRE-ENGINEERED EQUIPMENT | | STANDS ARE CONSIDERED STRUCTURAL COMPONNTS UNDER FAC | | RULE 9B-72 AND AS SUCH ARE SUBJECT TO THE FLORIDA | | PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR | | THE SPECIFIC STAND(S) TO BE USED IN ALL NEW | | APPLICATIONS, INCLUDING THOSE MENTIONED IN COMMENT #3. | | FOR MORE INFORMATION ON THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL | | SYSTEM PLEASE VISIT: WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | | 15. PG. M3.1: WALL LOUVERS ARE CLASSIFIED AS PANEL | | WALLS UNDER FAC RULE 9B-72 AND AS SUCH ARE SUBJECT TO | | THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. PROVIDE PRODUCT | | APPROVAL FOR THE SPECIFIC LOUVER(S) TO BE USED IN ALL | | NEW APPLICATIONS. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON THE FLORIDA | | PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM PLEASE VISIT: | | WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG | | | | 16. PG M3.1: DETAIL 5, CONNECTIONS TO SIDE-INLET | | UTILITY FANS SHALL BE FLANGED, GASKETED AND BOLTED TO | | THE INLET. PLEASE SHOW HOW DUCT IS TO BE CONNECTED TO | | EXHAUST FAN. FBC,M 506.3.2.2 | | | | 17. PG M2.1: AHU-4 AND AHU-5, THE HP RATING ON THESE | | FAN MOTORS EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE MOTOR POWER IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBC TABLE 13-410.1.1.1. ALSO, AHU-1 | | SHOWS A 3 HP MOTOR, BUT THE MODEL NUMBER SHOWN ON | | SCHEDULE INDICATES THIS SIZE UNIT WOULD HAVE A 5 HP | | MOTOR. PLEASE VERIFY MODEL NUMBERS AND SHOW ALL THREE | | UNITS TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THIS SECTION. | | | | 18. ENERGY CALCULATIONS: A METHOD A COMPLIANCE FORM HAS | | BEEN SUBMITTED FOR THIS PROJECT. HOWEVER, AS THIS IS | | NOT A WHOLE NEW BUILDING, COMPLIANCE WITH FBC CHAPTER | | 13 SHALL BE DEMONSTRATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH FBC | | 13-400.0.C.4. EXISTING BUILDINGS NOT MEETING THE | | DEFINITION OF A RENOVATION (SEE DEFINITION IN SEC.202) | | IN WHICH NEW HEATING, COOLING, WATER HEATING, | | ELECTRICAL OR LIGHTING SYSTEMS ARE INSTALLED SHALL MEET | | THE BASIC PRESCRIPTIVE MINIMUM EFFICIENCIES LISTED IN | | THIS CODE FOR THE SYSTEM(S) BEING CHANGED. | | | | 19. IF A CODE COMPLIANCE FORM IS TO BE SUBMITTED FOR | | THIS PROJECT, THE PERSON PREPARING THE COMPLIANCE | | CALCULATION SHALL CERTIFY THAT THE CALCULATION, OR | | AMENDMENTS THERETO, IS TRUE AND ACCURATE AND | | DEMONSTRATES THAT THE BUILDING IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 13 OF THIS CODE. ORIGINAL | | SIGNATURE AND SEAL IS REQUIRED ON THE CERTIFICATIONS | | PAGE OF EACH SET OF CALCULATIONS. FBC 13-400.3.ABC.2. | | ONE SET OF CALCULATIONS WHICH WERE SUBMITTED CONTAINS | | NO SEAL AND PHOTOCOPIED SIGNATURES. ALSO, THE PARTY | | RESPONSIBLE UNDER SUBSECTIONS 471.003 AND 481.228 AND | | CHAPTER 489, FLORIDA STATUTES, FOR THE DESIGN AND | | SPECIFICATION OF EACH BUILDING SYSTEM SHALL CERTIFY | | THAT THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THAT SYSTEM | | COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 13 OF THIS CODE | | (SEE ALSO SECTION 13-103.2). THIS INFORMATION SHALL | | ALSO BE INCLUDED ON THE CERTIFICATIONS PAGE IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION. | | | | 20. M1.1: ROOM 126 (MECHANICAL ROOM) HAS TWO 196,000 | | BTU/H GAS WATER HEATERS. DETAIL 9 ON PG P5.1 INDICATES | | EXHAUST AND INTAKE FOR WATER HEATERS ARE TO BE | | INSTALLED BY MECHANICAL. NO INFORMATION COULD BE FOUND | | IN MECHANICAL OR PLUMBING PLANS SHOWING ANY PROVISIONS | | FOR VENTING COMBUSTION OR DILLUTION AIR FOR THESE GAS | | APPLIANCES. SHOW MEANS OF VENTING AND COMBUSTION AIR IN | | ACCORDANCE WITH FBC,FG SEC. 304, PROVIDE CALCULATIONS | | IF COMBUSTION AIR IS REQUIRED UNDER THIS SECTION. IF A | | LISTED APPLIANCE IS BEING USED WITH INTEGRAL OR DIRECT | | VENTS, PROVIDE SUBMITTAL WITH INSTALLATION | | INSTRUCTIONS. | | | | 21. EACH SHEET OF PLANS AND PRINTS WHICH MUST BE SEALED | | UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 471, F.S., SHALL BE | | SEALED, SIGNED AND DATED BY THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER | | IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE. ENGINEERS SHALL LEGIBLY INDICATE | | THEIR NAME, ADDRESS, AND LICENSE NUMBER ON EACH SHEET. | | IF PRACTICING THROUGH A DULY AUTHORIZED ENGINEERING | | BUSINESS, ENGINEERS SHALL LEGIBLY INDICATE THEIR NAME | | AND LICENSE NUMBER, AS WELL AS, THE NAME, ADDRESS, AND | | CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER OF THE ENGINEERING | | BUSINESS ON EACH SHEET. A TITLE BLOCK ON EACH SHEET | | CONTAINING THE PRINTED NAME, ADDRESS, AND LICENSE | | NUMBER OF THE ENGINEER OR IF APPLICABLE, THE NAME AND | | LICENSE NUMBER OF THE ENGINEER, AND THE NAME, ADDRESS | | AND CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER OF THE | | ENGINEERING BUSINESS WILL SATISFY THIS REQUIREMENT. FAC | | 61G15-23.002(2) PLEASE CORRECT EACH SHEET SIGNED/SEALED | | BY AN ENGINEER WHICH IS MISSING THIS INFORMATION. | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT: | | RONALD J REGUEIRO | | 561.805.6719 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
8 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-12-19 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-12-19 |
Time |
10:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-12-18 |
Time |
16:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-12-19 10:19:16 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | | | 1. SHT P2.1 THE REVISIONS ON FILE FOR PUBLIC RECORD | | SHOW REVISIONS 07/25/07, 1, 3, 11/12/07, 4, 5, 6, | | REVISION 7 (DATED 4/7/08), 4/29/08, 5/22/08 & 9 DATED | | 5/30/08 BUT THE SHEET SUBMITTED FOR REVISION HAS | | DELETED THE REVISION NUMBERS 7 & 9 FROM THE REVISION | | INDEX AND ADDED 2 REVISION DATED 6/19/08 & 10/20/08 | | (INDICATED AS #SK-P1 BUT NOT FOUND). IN ORDER TO REVIEW | | THE REVISIONS, EACH REVISION AFTER REVISION 7 SHALL BE | | INDICATED WITH A REVISION NUMBER AND EACH REVISION | | SHALL BE CLOUDED ON THE FLOOR PLAN AND A REVISION | | NUMBER INDICATED ON EACH CLOUDED REVISION. REVISION 7 | | NUMBER SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE REVISION INDEX FOR | | DATE 4/7/08. SECTION 106.1.3. | | FBC-2004 106.1.3 QUALITY OF BUILDING PLANS. | | BUILDING PLANS SHALL BE DRAWN TO A MINIMUM 1/8 INCH | | SCALE UPON SUBSTANTIAL PAPER, CLOTH OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE | | MEDIUM. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY ESTABLISH THROUGH | | DEPARTMENTAL POLICY, STANDARDS FOR PLANS AND | | SPECIFICATIONS, IN ORDER TO PROVIDE CONFORMITY TO ITS | | RECORD RETENTION PROGRAM. THIS POLICY MAY INCLUDE SUCH | | THINGS AS MINIMUM SIZE, SHAPE, CONTRAST, CLARITY, OR | | OTHER ITEMS RELATED TO RECORDS MANAGEMENT. | | | | 2. SHT P2.1 THE GAS PIPING IS INCORRECT FOR THE 3/4" | | PIPE WITH 68 CFH. PER TABLE 402.4(1) 1" PIPE IS | | REQUIRED. -- THE GAS PIPING IS INCORRECT FOR THE 1 PIPE | | WITH 106 CFH. PER TABLE 402.4(1) 1-1/4" IS REQUIRED. | | THIS IS FOR THE GAS PIPING CHANGED AT THE PATIO | | HEATERS. | | | | 3. SHT P3.1 THE REVISIONS ON FILE FOR PUBLIC RECORD | | SHOW REVISIONS 07/25/07, 1, 3, 11/12/07, 4, 5, 6 & | | REVISION 7 (DATED 4/7/08, BUT THE SHEET SUBMITTED FOR | | REVISION HAS DELETED THE REVISION NUMBER 7 FROM THE | | REVISION INDEX AND ADDED 5 REVISIONS DATED 4/29/08, | | 5/22/08, 5/30/08, 6/19/08 & 10/20/08 (INDICATED AS | | #SK-P1 BUT NOT FOUND). IN ORDER TO REVIEW THE | | REVISIONS, EACH REVISION AFTER REVISION 7 SHALL BE | | INDICATED WITH A REVISION NUMBER AND EACH REVISION | | SHALL BE CLOUDED ON THE FLOOR PLAN AND A REVISION | | NUMBER INDICATED ON EACH CLOUDED REVISION. REVISION 7 | | NUMBER SHALL BE INDICATED ON THE REVISION INDEX FOR | | DATE 4/7/08. SECTION 106.1.3. | | FBC-2004 106.1.3 QUALITY OF BUILDING PLANS. | | BUILDING PLANS SHALL BE DRAWN TO A MINIMUM 1/8 INCH | | SCALE UPON SUBSTANTIAL PAPER, CLOTH OR OTHER ACCEPTABLE | | MEDIUM. THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MAY ESTABLISH THROUGH | | DEPARTMENTAL POLICY, STANDARDS FOR PLANS AND | | SPECIFICATIONS, IN ORDER TO PROVIDE CONFORMITY TO ITS | | RECORD RETENTION PROGRAM. THIS POLICY MAY INCLUDE SUCH | | THINGS AS MINIMUM SIZE, SHAPE, CONTRAST, CLARITY, OR | | OTHER ITEMS RELATED TO RECORDS MANAGEMENT. | | | | 4. SHT P3.1 SHT P2.1 THE GAS PIPING IS INCORRECT FOR | | THE 3/4" PIPE WITH 68 CFH. PER TABLE 402.4(1) 1" PIPE | | IS REQUIRED. -- THE GAS PIPING IS INCORRECT FOR THE 1 | | PIPE WITH 106 CFH. PER TABLE 402.4(1) 1-1/4" IS | | REQUIRED. THIS IS FOR THE GAS PIPING CHANGED AT THE | | PATIO HEATERS. | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, | | IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE | | ALL VOID SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE | | ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY ON TOP OF THE | | COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. | | THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-07-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-07-08 |
Time |
11:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mperson |
Date |
2008-07-08 |
Time |
11:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-07-08 11:42:39 | REVISION #9, SHEETS P1.1, P2.1, P3.2, AND P3.3: "OK". | | | | NOTE: PER ROBERT BROWN'S INSTRUCTIONS THE PRIVATE | | PROVIDER BUILDING PLANS COMPLIANCE AFFIDAVIT FOR PLBG | | SHEETS WAS FILED WITH THE PERMIT APPLICATION. |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-05-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-05-09 |
Time |
09:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-05-09 |
Time |
09:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-04-23 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-04-23 |
Time |
14:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-04-18 |
Time |
14:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-23 14:14:41 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | MUNICIPAL CODES WPB | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS AUDIT: | | | | ******FROM PREVIOUS AUDIS: (3RD AUDIT) | | | | ********FROM PREVIOUS AUDITS: (4TH AUDIT) | | | | 1. OK | | 2. OK | | | | 3. ALL ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS ARE MISSING REQUIRED | | INFORMATION. THE FIRM LICENSE NUMBER, (CERTIFICATE OF | | AUTHORIZATION), SIGNED, DATED SEAL, AND THE PRINTED | | NAME OF THE PERSON SEALING THE DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED IN | | THE TITLE BLOCK. ALSO THE SEAL APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN | | SIGNED WITH INITIALS. IF THIS IS INDEED THE LEGAL | | SIGNATURE OF THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD, THEN A SIGNED, | | SEALED, NOTORIZED LETTER SHALL BE SUBMITTED SHOWING THE | | LEGAL SIGNATURE OF THE ARCHITECT FOR OUR FILES. FAC | | 61G1-16.003, 61G1-16.004(2)(5)(6) & FS 481.219, | | 481.2055. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE SIGNED, SEALED, NOTORIZED | | LETTER HAS NOT BEEN SUBMITTED AS REQUESTED. | | ********RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE SIGNED, SEALED, | | NOTORIZED LETTER HAS NOT BEEN SUBMITTED AS REQUESTED. | | | | | | | | 4. OK | | 5. OK | | 6. OK | | | | 7. SHT FS-1 ITEM 86 WATER FILTER SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE | | REQUIREMENTS OF NSF-42. PLEASE SUBMIT MANUF. | | SPECIFICATIONS SHEETS SHOWING COMPLIANCE. SECTION | | 611.1. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE MANUF. SPECIFICATIONS FOR | | THE WATER FILTER HAVE NOT BEEN FOUND. ******RESPONSE | | NOTED, BUT THE MANUF. SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE WATER | | FILTER DO NOT SHOW COMPLIANCE/CERTIFICATION FOR NSF-42. | | THE REQUIREMENTS FOR NSF-42 ARE A REQUIREMENT FOR | | REDUCTION OF CHLORINE, TASTE & ODOR, CHLORAMINE, ZINC | | ETC AS WELL AS BACTERIOSTATIC EFFECTS. NSF-53 IS NOT | | SHOWN TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF NSF-42. A | | SEPARATE FILTER CAN BE ADDED TO THE SYSTEM TO COMPLY | | WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 611.1. | | ********RESPONSE NOTED. MANUF. SPECIFICATION SHEETS | | SUBMITTED, BUT FILTER IS NOT INDICATED ON THE PLANS. | | PLEASE SHOW THE FILTER ON FS SHEET OR PLUMBING SHEET. | | | | 8. OK | | 9. OK | | 10. OK | | 11. OK | | 12. OK | | 13. OK | | 14. OK | | 15. OK | | 16. OK | | 17. OK | | 18. OK | | 19. OK | | 20. OK | | 21. OK | | | | 22. SHT P3.1 A SEPARATE GAS PERMIT IS REQUIRED. THE | | FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS REQUIRED: | | | | A. OK | | B. OK | | C. OK | | D. OK | | E. OK | | F. OK | | G.OK | | H. OK | | 23. OK | | 24. OK | | 25. OK | | 26. OK | | 27. OK | | 28. OK | | | | **********NEW COMMENTS********** | | | | 1B. OK | | 2B. SEE ATTACHED SHEET CONCERNING THE DESIGN | | PROFESSIONAL AND FS 553.80(2)(B). THIS IS GIVEN AS A | | NOTICE ONLY AT THIS TIME. | | | | **********NEW COMMENTS********** | | | | 1C. OK | | 2C. OK | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE ALL VOID | | SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY | | ON TOP OF THE COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. THANK YOU | | FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | ****NO RESPONSE OF THE REQUEST FOR ONE COPY OF THE | | VOIDED SHEETS TO BE SUBMITTED FOR COMPARISON. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-03-08 |
Time |
10:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-03-08 |
Time |
10:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-03-08 10:48:55 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | MUNICIPAL CODES WPB | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | ******FROM PREVIOUS REVIEWS: (3RD REVIEW) | | | | 1. OK | | 2. OK | | | | 3. ALL ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS ARE MISSING REQUIRED | | INFORMATION. THE FIRM LICENSE NUMBER, (CERTIFICATE OF | | AUTHORIZATION), SIGNED, DATED SEAL, AND THE PRINTED | | NAME OF THE PERSON SEALING THE DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED IN | | THE TITLE BLOCK. ALSO THE SEAL APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN | | SIGNED WITH INITIALS. IF THIS IS INDEED THE LEGAL | | SIGNATURE OF THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD, THEN A SIGNED, | | SEALED, NOTORIZED LETTER SHALL BE SUBMITTED SHOWING THE | | LEGAL SIGNATURE OF THE ARCHITECT FOR OUR FILES. FAC | | 61G1-16.003, 61G1-16.004(2)(5)(6) & FS 481.219, | | 481.2055. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE SIGNED, SEALED, NOTORIZED | | LETTER HAS NOT BEEN SUBMITTED AS REQUESTED. | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE SIGNED, SEALED, NOTORIZED | | LETTER HAS NOT BEEN SUBMITTED AS REQUESTED. | | | | | | 4. OK | | 5. OK | | 6. OK | | | | 7. SHT FS-1 ITEM 86 WATER FILTER SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE | | REQUIREMENTS OF NSF-42. PLEASE SUBMIT MANUF. | | SPECIFICATIONS SHEETS SHOWING COMPLIANCE. SECTION | | 611.1. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE MANUF. SPECIFICATIONS FOR | | THE WATER FILTER HAVE NOT BEEN FOUND. ******RESPONSE | | NOTED, BUT THE MANUF. SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE WATER | | FILTER DO NOT SHOW COMPLIANCE/CERTIFICATION FOR NSF-42. | | THE REQUIREMENTS FOR NSF-42 ARE A REQUIREMENT FOR | | REDUCTION OF CHLORINE, TASTE & ODOR, CHLORAMINE, ZINC | | ETC AS WELL AS BACTERIOSTATIC EFFECTS. NSF-53 IS NOT | | SHOWN TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF NSF-42. A | | SEPARATE FILTER CAN BE ADDED TO THE SYSTEM TO COMPLY | | WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 611.1 | | | | 8. OK | | 9. OK | | 10. OK | | 11. OK | | 12. OK | | 13. OK | | 14. OK | | 15. OK | | 16. OK | | 17. OK | | 18. OK | | 19. OK | | 20. OK | | 21. OK | | | | 22. SHT P3.1 A SEPARATE GAS PERMIT IS REQUIRED. THE | | FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS REQUIRED: | | | | A. OK | | B. OK | | C. OK | | D. OK | | E. OK | | F. OK | | | | G. SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR ALL GAS | | EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH | | STANDARDS NFPA 54, NFPA 58, AND THE | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC 402.2.--NO MANUF. SHEETS | | FOR ITEM #5RICE COOKERS, THE WATER HEATERS, AND THE | | RH UNITS. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT MANUF. SHEETS ARE NOT | | SUBMITTED. | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE RICE COOKER IS NOT LISTED | | AS BEING TESTED FOR THE GAS COMPONETS. THE ONLY LISTING | | SHOWN IS FOR NSF. PER SECTION 301.3. PLEASE SHOW | | LISTING. | | | | H. OK | | 23. OK | | | | 24. SHT P3.2 GREASE WASTE RISER DIAGRAM DOES NOT | | REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN, NOR DOES IT MEET CODE | | REQUIREMENTS. THE ISLAND VENTS SHALL CONNECT TO THE | | DRAIN AT THE LOWEST POINT, AND CLEANOUTS ARE REQUIRED | | ON BOTH VENT LINES. (SEE ATTACHED SHEET). ****RESPONSE | | NOTED, BUT THE RISER DIAGRAM STILL DOES NOT REFLECT THE | | FLOOR PLAN, NOR DOES IT MEET CODE. THERE IS A DRY | | HORIZONTAL VENT UPSTREAM OF FS3 FOR FIXTURE 63. THIS IS | | NOT SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN. ALSO FS1 FOR THE | | CONDENSATE FROM THE WALK IN COOLER IS NOT SHOWN ON THE | | RISER DIAGRAM. SECTIONS 106.1.1, 905.3 & 905.4. | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE VENT FOR THE FLOOR SINK | | INDICATED IN COMMENT ABOVE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH CODE | | SECTION 905.4. FLOOR SINK CAN BE CONNECTED ON THE RISE | | OF THE VENT TO WASH THE BASE OF THE VENT. | | | | 25. OK | | 26. OK | | 27. OK | | 28. OK | | | | **********NEW COMMENTS********** | | | | 1B. ALL PRIVATE PROVIDER AFFIDAVIT PROJECTS REQUIRE THE | | OWNER TO SIGN AN OWNER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT LETTER PER FS | | 553.791. THIS SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PLANS AND | | APPLICATION FOR PERMIT. | | ******RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE LETTER HAS NOT BEEN | | SUBMITTED. | | | | 2B. SEE ATTACHED SHEET CONCERNING THE DESIGN | | PROFESSIONAL AND FS 553.80(2)(B). THIS IS GIVEN AS A | | NOTICE ONLY AT THIS TIME. | | | | **********NEW COMMENTS********** | | | | 1C. THE GAS SYSTEM IS NOW INDICATED AS A 2PSI SYSTEM. | | REGULATORS ARE REQUIRED IN THE SYSTEM TO REDUCE THE | | PRESSURE FROM 2PSI TO .5 PSI PRIOR TO EACH APPLIANCE OR | | GROUP OF APPLIANCES. A SHUT OFF VALVE IS REQUIRED | | UPSTREAM OF EACH REGULATOR WITH A UNION DOWNSTREAM OF | | THE SHUT OFF VALVE. SECTION 409.4. (SHUT OFF VALVES, | | REGULATORS & UNIONS CAN NOT BE LOCATION IN THE | | CEILING). | | | | 2C. SUBMIT MANUF. SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE GAS | | REGULATORS. IF THERE ARE VENT LINES ON THE REGULATORS, | | INDICATE MATERIAL FOR VENTS. (NO COMBUSTABLE MATERIALS | | FOR THE VENTS). SHOW ROUTING AND TERMINATION OF VENTS | | IF INSTALLED/REQUIRED. | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE ALL VOID | | SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY | | ON TOP OF THE COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. THANK YOU | | FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | ****NO RESPONSE OF THE REQUEST FOR ONE COPY OF THE | | VOIDED SHEETS TO BE SUBMITTED FOR COMPARISON. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-01-28 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-01-28 |
Time |
16:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2008-01-25 |
Time |
16:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-01-28 16:53:59 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | MUNICIPAL CODES WPB | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | ****FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW: | | | | 1. OK | | | | 2. THE GREASE INTERCEPTOR SHALL BE INSPECTED AND SIZED | | BY THE UTILITY DEPT. INDUSTRIAL PRE-TREATMENT, | | ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE. PLEASE CONTACT RODNEY COMPO, | | (561) 822-2272, E-MAIL [email protected] OR CALVIN | | WILLIAMS (561) 822-2284, E-MAIL [email protected]. | | THEIR FAX NUMBER IS (561) 822-2287. A WRITTEN | | DETERMINATION SHEET FROM ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SHALL | | BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PLANS SHOWING APPROVAL FOR | | EXISTING AND NEW GREASE INTERCEPTORS. WPB MUNICIPAL | | CODE ARTICLE III SECTION 90-124(7). | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL HAS NOT | | BEEN SUBMITTED. | | | | 3. ALL ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS ARE MISSING REQUIRED | | INFORMATION. THE FIRM LICENSE NUMBER, (CERTIFICATE OF | | AUTHORIZATION), SIGNED, DATED SEAL, AND THE PRINTED | | NAME OF THE PERSON SEALING THE DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED IN | | THE TITLE BLOCK. ALSO THE SEAL APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN | | SIGNED WITH INITIALS. IF THIS IS INDEED THE LEGAL | | SIGNATURE OF THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD, THEN A SIGNED, | | SEALED, NOTORIZED LETTER SHALL BE SUBMITTED SHOWING THE | | LEGAL SIGNATURE OF THE ARCHITECT FOR OUR FILES. FAC | | 61G1-16.003, 61G1-16.004(2)(5)(6) & FS 481.219, | | 481.2055. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE SIGNED, SEALED, NOTORIZED | | LETTER HAS NOT BEEN SUBMITTED AS REQUESTED. | | | | 4. OK | | | | 5. SHT A8.1 DETAIL 9. SUBMIT MANUF SPECIFICATIONS FOR | | THE LAV DRAIN PAN. INDICATE REFERENCE STANDARD FOR LAV. | | SECTIONS 303, 303.1 303.2, & 303.4. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE LAV DRAIN PAN AND GRANITE | | LAV SHALL BE SUBMITTED AS ALTERNATIVE MATERIALS, DESIGN | | & METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION AND EQUIPMENT PER SECTION | | 104.1.1 SUBMIT DETAILS AS TO THE FINISH AND POROSITY OF | | THE GRANITE AND INDICATE THE GUAGE OF THE STAINLESS | | STEEL LAV DRAIN PAN. INFORMATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO | | THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. | | | | 6. OK | | | | 7. SHT FS-1 ITEM 86 WATER FILTER SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE | | REQUIREMENTS OF NSF-42. PLEASE SUBMIT MANUF. | | SPECIFICATIONS SHEETS SHOWING COMPLIANCE. SECTION | | 611.1. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE MANUF. SPECIFICATIONS FOR | | THE WATER FILTER HAVE NOT BEEN FOUND. | | | | 8. OK | | 9. OK | | | | 10. SHT FS-2 FOOD SERVICE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE, ITEM 163 | | DOES NOT INDICATE DRAINAGE, AND ITEM 173 INDICATES | | DRAINAGE FOR A STORAGE CABINET. PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTION | | 106.1.1. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE KITCHEN SPEC BOOK HAS NOT | | BEEN FOUND. | | | | 11. SHT FS-4 DETAILS INDICATED SUCH AS THE TRENCH DRAIN | | DETAIL, DRAIN SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION THRU FLOOR | | RECESS, INDIRECT WASTE & AIR GAP. WHERE THESE DESIGNED | | BY THE EQUIPMENT SUPPLIERS? PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTION | | 106.1. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE KITCHEN CONSULTANT RESPONSE | | HAS NOT BEEN FOUND. | | | | 12. ALL STRUCTURAL SHEETS. THE CERTIFICATE OF | | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER, PRINTED NAME OF THE ENGINEER, AND | | THE LICENSE NUMBER OF THE ENGINEER ARE REQUIRED ON THE | | TITLE BLOCK. ALSO THE PLANS APPEAR TO BE SIGNED WITH | | INITIALS. IF THIS IS INDEED THE LEGAL SIGNATURE OF THE | | ENGINEER, THEN A SIGNED, SEALED, NOTORIZED LETTER SHALL | | BE SUBMITTED INDICATING THE LEGAL SIGNATURE FOR OUR | | FILES. FAC 61G15-23.002(2) & FS 471.025. ****RESPONSE | | NOTED, BUT THE SIGNED, SEALED, NOTORIZED LETTER HAS NOT | | BEEN SUBMITTED. | | | | 13. OK | | 14. OK | | 15. OK | | 16. OK | | 17. OK | | 18. OK | | 19. OK | | 20. OK | | | | 21. SHT P2.1 PLUMBING PLAN NOTES #11 THE GAS PROVIDER | | SUPPLIES THE GAS AT EITHER 2 PSI OR 1/2 PSI, (12" TO | | 14" W.C.). PLANS INDICATE 7" W.C. PLEASE CONTACT THE | | GAS PROVIDER AND INDICATE THE INLET PRESSURE PROVIDED. | | SECTION 402. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE INLET PRESSURE HAS BEEN | | INDICATED AS 2PSI AND .5 PSI. PLEASE CONTACT THE GAS | | PROVIDER AND INDICATE PRESSURE PROVIDED AT THE METER. | | | | 22. SHT P3.1 A SEPARATE GAS PERMIT IS REQUIRED. THE | | FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS REQUIRED: | | | | A. SUBMIT AN ISOMETRIC DRAWING THAT | | CLEARLY SHOWS ALL CUT SECTIONS OF PIPE | | AND CORRESPONDING LENGTHS PER FBC-2004 | | FUEL GAS CODE. - THE LENGTHS OF PIPE ARE NOT | | INDICATED. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE CUT SECTIONS FROM THE METER | | TO THE FIRST RISERS ON BOTH BRANCHES HAVE NO LENGTHS | | INDICATED AS WELL AS THE LENGTH FROM THE BRANCH LINES | | TO THE PATIO HEATERS. | | | | B. OK | | | | C. SHOW THE DISTANCE FROM THE POINT OF | | DELIVERY, (METER), TO THE MOST REMOTE | | OUTLET IN THE BUILDING AND/OR SYSTEM PER | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE APPENDIX A - USE | | OF CAPACITY TABLES A.3.1(4). - TO BE VERIFIED ONCE | | REQUIREMENT "A" IS ADDRESSED. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT "A" HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETLY | | ADDRESS AND THE TOTAL DISTANCE FROM THE METER TO THE | | MOST REMOTE OUTLET DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE CORRECT. | | PLEASE RECHECK THE ADDITION. | | | | D. OK | | | | E. INDICATE THE DELIVERY PRESSURE (PSI) | | PER FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC. 402.2. | | NATURAL GAS SPECIFY .5 PSI OR 2 PSI. - SEE COMMENT | | #21. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT THE DELIVERY PRESSURE CAN BE | | 2PSI OR .5 PSI, BUT NOT BOTH. INDICATE THE DELIVERY | | PRESSURE. | | | | F. OK | | | | G. SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR ALL GAS | | EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH | | STANDARDS NFPA 54, NFPA 58, AND THE | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC 402.2.--NO MANUF. SHEETS | | FOR ITEM #5RICE COOKERS, THE WATER HEATERS, AND THE | | RH UNITS. | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT MANUF. SHEETS ARE NOT | | SUBMITTED. | | | | H. OK | | | | 23. SHT P3.1 GAS RISER DIAGRAM, 2-1/2" REQUIRED FOR | | 1078 CFH, 1-1/4" REQUIRED TO EACH WATER HEATER, 2" | | REQUIRED FOR 374 CFH TO 1ST RH, 1" REQUIRED FOR THE | | RICE COOKERS (2) & 1-1/2" REQUIRED TO THE FRYERS. TABLE | | 402.4(2) - (IF SCHEDULE 40 PIPE). | | ****RESPONSE NOTED, BUT 3/4" IS STILL SHOWN TO THE RICE | | COOKERS. | | | | 24. SHT P3.2 GREASE WASTE RISER DIAGRAM DOES NOT | | REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN, NOR DOES IT MEET CODE | | REQUIREMENTS. THE ISLAND VENTS SHALL CONNECT TO THE | | DRAIN AT THE LOWEST POINT, AND CLEANOUTS ARE REQUIRED | | ON BOTH VENT LINES. (SEE ATTACHED SHEET). ****RESPONSE | | NOTED, BUT THE RISER DIAGRAM STILL DOES NOT REFLECT THE | | FLOOR PLAN, NOR DOES IT MEET CODE. THERE IS A DRY | | HORIZONTAL VENT UPSTREAM OF FS3 FOR FIXTURE 63. THIS IS | | NOT SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN. ALSO FS1 FOR THE | | CONDENSATE FROM THE WALK IN COOLER IS NOT SHOWN ON THE | | RISER DIAGRAM. SECTIONS 106.1.1, 905.3 & 905.4. | | | | 25. OK | | 26. OK | | 27. OK | | 28. OK | | | | **********NEW COMMENTS********** | | | | 1B. ALL PRIVATE PROVIDER AFFIDAVIT PROJECTS REQUIRE THE | | OWNER TO SIGN AN OWNER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT LETTER PER FS | | 553.791. THIS SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PLANS AND | | APPLICATION FOR PERMIT. | | | | 2B. SEE ATTACHED SHEET CONCERNING THE DESIGN | | PROFESSIONAL AND FS 553.80(2)(B). THIS IS GIVEN AS A | | NOTICE ONLY AT THIS TIME. | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE ALL VOID | | SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY | | ON TOP OF THE COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. THANK YOU | | FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | ****NO RESPONSE OF THE REQUEST FOR ONE COPY OF THE | | VOIDED SHEETS TO BE SUBMITTED FOR COMPARISON. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-09-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-09-29 |
Time |
16:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-09-27 |
Time |
16:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-10-01 09:52:11 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | MUNICIPAL CODES WPB | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | 1. ROUTE PLANS TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPT OF | | BUSINESS REGULATION, (DBPR), DIVISION OF HOTEL & | | RESTAURANT FOOD SERVICE LICENSE FOR REVIEW. REVIEWED | | SHEETS SHALL BE INSERTED INTO EACH SET OF PLANS AND THE | | TWO PAGE "SPECIFICATION WORKSHEETS" SHALL BE ATTACHED | | TO THE STAMPED PLANS REVIEWED BY DBPR. SECTION | | 102.2.1. | | | | 2. THE GREASE INTERCEPTOR SHALL BE INSPECTED AND SIZED | | BY THE UTILITY DEPT. INDUSTRIAL PRE-TREATMENT, | | ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE. PLEASE CONTACT RODNEY COMPO, | | (561) 822-2272, E-MAIL [email protected] OR CALVIN | | WILLIAMS (561) 822-2284, E-MAIL [email protected]. | | THEIR FAX NUMBER IS (561) 822-2287. A WRITTEN | | DETERMINATION SHEET FROM ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SHALL | | BE SUBMITTED WITH THE PLANS SHOWING APPROVAL FOR | | EXISTING AND NEW GREASE INTERCEPTORS. WPB MUNICIPAL | | CODE ARTICLE III SECTION 90-124(7). | | | | 3. ALL ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS ARE MISSING REQUIRED | | INFORMATION. THE FIRM LICENSE NUMBER, (CERTIFICATE OF | | AUTHORIZATION), SIGNED, DATED SEAL, AND THE PRINTED | | NAME OF THE PERSON SEALING THE DOCUMENT IS REQUIRED IN | | THE TITLE BLOCK. ALSO THE SEAL APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN | | SIGNED WITH INITIALS. IF THIS IS INDEED THE LEGAL | | SIGNATURE OF THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD, THEN A SIGNED, | | SEALED, NOTORIZED LETTER SHALL BE SUBMITTED SHOWING THE | | LEGAL SIGNATURE OF THE ARCHITECT FOR OUR FILES. FAC | | 61G1-16.003, 61G1-16.004(2)(5)(6) & FS 481.219, | | 481.2055. | | | | 4. SHT A1.1 KEY NOTES WERE NOT FOUND. PLEASE CORRELATE | | KEY NOTES WITH FLOOR PLAN. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | | 5. SHT A8.1 DETAIL 9. SUBMIT MANUF SPECIFICATIONS FOR | | THE LAV DRAIN PAN. INDICATE REFERENCE STANDARD FOR LAV. | | SECTIONS 303, 303.1 303.2, & 303.4. | | | | 6. SHT A8.1 DETAIL 10 INDICATES A STORAGE CABINET WHERE | | THE LAV DRAIN PAN SHOULD BE PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTION | | 106.1.1. | | | | 7. SHT FS-1 ITEM 86 WATER FILTER SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE | | REQUIREMENTS OF NSF-42. PLEASE SUBMIT MANUF. | | SPECIFICATIONS SHEETS SHOWING COMPLIANCE. SECTION | | 611.1. | | | | 8. SHTS FI-1 THRU FS-13 ARE SEALED BY THE ARCHITECT OF | | RECORD INDICATING "REVIEWED ONLY". IF THE PLANS ARE | | SIGNED AND SEALED THEN A TITLE BLOCK, PRINTED NAME OF | | THE PERSON SEALING THE DOCUMENT, DATED SEAL ETC IS | | REQUIRED. IF REVIEWING ONLY, INDICATE WITH A SHOP | | REVIEW APPROVAL STAMP ONLY SUCH AS USED IN SUBMITTALS. | | FAC 61G1-16.004 & FS 481.2055. | | | | 9. SHT FS-1 EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE ITEM #62 NOT FOUND ON | | THE FLOOR PLAN, & ITEM 147 INDICATES QTY 1 BUT 2 ARE | | SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN. PLEASE CORRELATE. SECTION | | 106.1.1. | | | | 10. SHT FS-2 FOOD SERVICE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE, ITEM 163 | | DOES NOT INDICATE DRAINAGE, AND ITEM 173 INDICATES | | DRAINAGE FOR A STORAGE CABINET. PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTION | | 106.1.1. | | | | 11. SHT FS-4 DETAILS INDICATED SUCH AS THE TRENCH DRAIN | | DETAIL, DRAIN SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION THRU FLOOR | | RECESS, INDIRECT WASTE & AIR GAP. WHERE THESE DESIGNED | | BY THE EQUIPMENT SUPPLIERS? PLEASE CLARIFY. SECTION | | 106.1. | | | | 12. ALL STRUCTURAL SHEETS. THE CERTIFICATE OF | | AUTHORIZATION NUMBER, PRINTED NAME OF THE ENGINEER, AND | | THE LICENSE NUMBER OF THE ENGINEER ARE REQUIRED ON THE | | TITLE BLOCK. ALSO THE PLANS APPEAR TO BE SIGNED WITH | | INITIALS. IF THIS IS INDEED THE LEGAL SIGNATURE OF THE | | ENGINEER, THEN A SIGNED, SEALED, NOTORIZED LETTER SHALL | | BE SUBMITTED INDICATING THE LEGAL SIGNATURE FOR OUR | | FILES. FAC 61G15-23.002(2) & FS 471.025. | | | | 13. ALL MEP SHEETS. THE CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION | | NUMBER, PRINTED NAME OF THE ENGINEER, AND THE LICENSE | | NUMBER OF THE ENGINEER ARE REQUIRED ON THE TITLE BLOCK. | | ALSO THE PLANS APPEAR TO BE SIGNED WITH INITIALS. IF | | THIS IS INDEED THE LEGAL SIGNATURE OF THE ENGINEER, | | THEN A SIGNED, SEALED, NOTORIZED LETTER SHALL BE | | SUBMITTED INDICATING THE LEGAL SIGNATURE FOR OUR FILES. | | FAC 61G15-23.002(2) & FS 471.025. | | | | 14. SHT P1.1 THE CONDENSATE FROM THE AHU'S SHALL NOT | | DRAIN INTO THE SANITARY SYSTEM. THE CONDENSATE SHALL | | DRAIN SEPARATELY OUT OF THE BUILDING AND CONNECT TO | | STORM DRAINAGE, A CATCH BASIN, A DRYWELL OR INTO A | | PLANTED AREA SO AS NOT TO CREATE A HAZARD. IF THE | | CONDENSATE CONNECTS TO THE STORM LINES OUTSIDE THE | | BUILDING, THEN A RELIEF VENT, (GOOSENECK), SHALL BE | | PROVIDED AS THE CONDENSATE LINE EXITS THE BUILDING. | | MUNICIPAL CODE ARTICLE III SECTION 90-125(5). | | | | 15. SHT P1.1 CONDENSATE FROM THE COOLER/FREEZER. FLOOR | | DRAINS ARE NOT APPROVED INDIRECT WASTE RECEPTORS. A | | FLOOR SINK OR HUB DRAIN IS REQUIRED. SECTIONS 802.3 & | | 802.3.2. | | | | 16. SHT P1.1 THE DISWASHER SHALL DRAIN TO THE SANITARY | | SYSTEM, NOT THE GREASE SYSTEM. MUNICIPAL CODE ARTICLE | | III SECTION 90-124(7)(B). PLEASE CHANGE THE FLOOR PLAN | | AND THE SANITARY RISER DIAGRAM. | | | | 17. SHT P1.1 PLUMBING WASTE & VENT PLAN NOTES #6. | | CLEANOUTS TO BE PROVIDED AT THE BASE OF THE STACK PER | | SECTION 708.3.4. PLEASE INDICATE THE CORRECT LOCATION | | FOR THE CLEANOUTS. | | | | 18. SHT P1.1 VBF'S DO NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF | | SECTION 913, ISLAND VENTS. (SEE ATTACHED SHEET FOR | | REQUIRED PIPING). PLEASE CORRECT VENTING TO COMPLY WITH | | SECTION 913. | | | | 19. SHT P2.1 THE 3" GAS LINE IS INDICATED AS HAVING | | 1,812 CFH & 1,482 CFH ON THE SAME LINE DOWNSTREAM OF | | THE METER. PLEASE ONLY SHOW THE CORRECT LOAD ON THE GAS | | LINE. SECTION 106.1.1. | | | | 20. SHT P2.1 PLUMBING PLAN NOTES #3. THE RPZV BACKFLOWS | | SHALL BE INSTALLED A MAXIMUM 4' ABOVE THE FLOOR FOR | | CERTIFICTION AND SERVICE. PLEASE INDICATE ON PLANS. | | SECTION 106.2.1. | | | | 21. SHT P2.1 PLUMBING PLAN NOTES #11 THE GAS PROVIDER | | SUPPLIES THE GAS AT EITHER 2 PSI OR 1/2 PSI, (12" TO | | 14" W.C.). PLANS INDICATE 7" W.C. PLEASE CONTACT THE | | GAS PROVIDER AND INDICATE THE INLET PRESSURE PROVIDED. | | SECTION 402. | | | | 22. SHT P3.1 A SEPARATE GAS PERMIT IS REQUIRED. THE | | FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS REQUIRED: | | | | A. SUBMIT AN ISOMETRIC DRAWING THAT | | CLEARLY SHOWS ALL CUT SECTIONS OF PIPE | | AND CORRESPONDING LENGTHS PER FBC-2004 | | FUEL GAS CODE. - THE LENGTHS OF PIPE ARE NOT | | INDICATED. | | | | B. SHOW TYPE OF PIPING MATERIAL BEING | | INSTALLED, ALL PIPE SIZES, (AND THE EDH | | NUMBER OF CORRUGATED STAINLESS STEEL | | TUBING FOR EACH PIPE SIZE IF BEING USED. | | | | C. SHOW THE DISTANCE FROM THE POINT OF | | DELIVERY, (METER), TO THE MOST REMOTE | | OUTLET IN THE BUILDING AND/OR SYSTEM PER | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE APPENDIX A - USE | | OF CAPACITY TABLES A.3.1(4). - TO BE VERIFIED ONCE | | REQUIREMENT "A" IS ADDRESSED. | | | | D. SUBMIT CALCULATIONS FOR COMBUSTION | | AIR (IF APPLICABLE) PER FBC-2004 FUEL | | GAS CODE SECTION 304. | | | | E. INDICATE THE DELIVERY PRESSURE (PSI) | | PER FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC. 402.2. | | NATURAL GAS SPECIFY .5 PSI OR 2 PSI. - SEE COMMENT | | #21. | | | | F. SUBMIT A DETAIL SHOWING THE TYPE, | | LOCATION, SIZE AND TERMINATION OF THE | | GAS VENTS PER FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE | | SECS. 502 THRU 505. | | | | G. SUBMIT MANUFACTURE SHEETS FOR ALL GAS | | EQUIPMENT TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH | | STANDARDS NFPA 54, NFPA 58, AND THE | | FBC-2004 FUEL GAS CODE SEC 402.2.--NO MANUF. SHEETS | | FOR ITEM #5RICE COOKERS, THE WATER HEATERS, AND THE | | RH UNITS. | | | | H. EMERGENCY HOOD SHUT DOWN SHUT OFF | | VALVE TO BE BELOW CEILING. MANUAL SHUT | | OFF VALVE TO BE UPSTREAM. UNION TO BE | | DOWN STREAM OF MANUAL VALVE. - UNION NOT SHOWN. | | | | 23. SHT P3.1 GAS RISER DIAGRAM, 2-1/2" REQUIRED FOR | | 1078 CFH, 1-1/4" REQUIRED TO EACH WATER HEATER, 2" | | REQUIRED FOR 374 CFH TO 1ST RH, 1" REQUIRED FOR THE | | RICE COOKERS (2) & 1-1/2" REQUIRED TO THE FRYERS. TABLE | | 402.4(2) - (IF SCHEDULE 40 PIPE). | | | | 24. SHT P3.2 GREASE WASTE RISER DIAGRAM DOES NOT | | REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN, NOR DOES IT MEET CODE | | REQUIREMENTS. THE ISLAND VENTS SHALL CONNECT TO THE | | DRAIN AT THE LOWEST POINT, AND CLEANOUTS ARE REQUIRED | | ON BOTH VENT LINES. (SEE ATTACHED SHEET). | | | | 25. SHT P3.2 GREASE WASTE & VENT RISER VENT DOES NOT | | MEET CODE PER SECTION 905.4. VENTS ARE TURNING | | HORIZONTALLY PRIOR TO 6" ABOVE THE FLOOD RIM LEVEL OF | | THE FLOOR SINKS. (SEE GENERAL NOTE). | | | | 26. SHT P3.2 GREASE WASTE & VENT RISER DOES NOT REFLECT | | THE FLOOR PLAN. FLOOR SINK (107) IS NOT SHOWN ON THE | | FLOOR PLAN.--IDENTIFY THE FIXTURE THAT THE ICE | | MACHINE IS DRAINING INTO. AN INDIRECT WASTE RECEPTOR IS | | REQUIRED. SECTIONS 106.1.1, 802.3 & 802.3.2. | | | | 27. SHT P3.2 SANITARY WASTE & VENT RISER DIAGRAM DOES | | NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN, NOR DOES IT MEET CODE | | REQUIREMENTS. 2 FLOOR DRAINS ARE SHOWN ON THE FLOOR | | PLAN THAT ARE NOT ON THE RISER DIAGRAM.--PIPING TO | | FIXTURE 166 DOES NOT REFLECT THE FLOOR PLAN.-- PIPING | | UPSTREAM OF FIXTURE 162 DOES NOT RELFECT THE FLOOR | | PLAN. (AS SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLAN IT IS A DRY | | HORIZONTAL VENT WHICH IS NOT APPROVED PER SECTION 905.3 | | & SECTION 905.4.--THE ISLAND VENT FOR FIXTURE 166 | | DOES NOT MEET CODE REQUIREMENT. (SEE ATTACHED SHEET). | | | | 28. SHT P3.3 SHOW WATER HAMMER ARRESTORS REQUIRED BY | | SECTION 604.9 ON THE RISER DIAGRAM. (QUICK CLOSING | | VALVES SUCH AS WASHING MACHINE, ICE MAKER ETC.). THE | | WATER HAMMER ARRESTORS SHALL BE LOCATED NEAR THE | | FIXTURES IN AN "EFFECTIVE RANGE" NO IN THE CEILING. | | PDI-WH 201 AND MANUF. INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE ALL VOID | | SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY | | ON TOP OF THE COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. THANK YOU | | FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6731 | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-04-18 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-04-18 |
Time |
16:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-04-18 |
Time |
16:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-04-18 16:41:44 | SIGNAGE AND AWNINGS NEED SEPARATE PERMITS. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-03-12 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-03-12 |
Time |
13:31 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-03-12 |
Time |
13:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-03-12 13:34:46 | FAILED | | | | THE PLANS THAT HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED DO NOT REFLECT THE | | REMOVAL OF THE OUTDOOR SEATING AREA ROOF AND COLUMNS ON | | THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING THAT WAS APPROVED BY A | | MINOR AMENDMENT AND FORMAL SITE PLAN ON FEBRUARY 28, | | 2008. | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER (561) 822-1435. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-01-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-01-24 |
Time |
15:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2008-01-24 |
Time |
15:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2008-01-24 15:25:33 | FAILED | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT - THE APPROVAL OF A MINOR PLANNED | | DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT AND FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW ARE | | REQUIRED FOR THE FRONT DOOR CANOPY AND THE STRUCTURE TO | | COVER THE OUTDOOR SEATING AREAS.PLEASE NOTE THAT | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE GENERATED AS PART OF THIS | | REVIEW PROCESS THAT WILL AFFECT THE SITE LAYOUT, | | ELEVATIONS, ETC. | | | | 2) REPEAT COMMENT - A SURVEY SHOWING ALL PROPOSED | | FEATURES IN RELATION TO THE PROPERTY LINE(S) AND | | EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREAS IS REQUIRED. | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1435. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2008-01-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
2007-09-27 |
Time |
15:44 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
2007-09-27 |
Time |
15:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-09-27 15:45:55 | FAILED | | | | 1) THE APPROVAL OF A MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT | | AMENDMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THE FRONT DOOR CANOPY AND THE | | CANOPY OVER THE OUTDOOR SEATING, INCLUDING ALL SUPPORT | | COLUMNS. | | | | 2) A SURVEY SHOWING ALL PROPOSED FEATURES IN RELATION | | TO THE PROPERTY LINE(S) IS BE REQUIRED. | | | | 3) IS LANDSCAPE PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL AS PART OF THIS | | PROJECT, SPECIFICALLY THE HEDGE NEAR THE ENTRANCE?ANY | | LANDSCAPE THAT IS MODIFIED WILL NEED TO BE INCLUDE WITH | | THE MINOR AMENDMENT. | | | | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1435. |
|
|
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |