2007-09-12 15:57:53 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| SEPT. 10, 2007 |
| PERMIT: 07080049 |
| ADD: 2345 OKEECHOBEE BLVD |
| CONT: POPPER AND ASSOCIATES |
| TEL: (561)719-7131 |
| |
| FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS |
| * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS |
| |
| REVIEW |
| ACTION: DENIED |
| |
| 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- |
| PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! |
| WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & |
| REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL |
| LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH |
| A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE |
| SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE |
| FOUND WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR |
| YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. |
| |
| |
| 2) FL S S 713.13NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE FILED |
| WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT.NOTE: 713.13(2) IF THE |
| WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS NOT |
| ACTUALLYCOMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE RECORDING |
| THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: 713.13(6) |
| THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT THE |
| CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. |
| |
| 3A) SHEET SP-1 CODE SUMMERY, THE PLANS FAIL TO INDICATE |
| AS TO WHICH EDITION OF THE CODE THIS BUILDING IS BEING |
| DESIGNED TO. 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE W/ 2006 |
| AMENDMENTS. |
| |
| 3B) THE PERMIT APPLICATION AND PLAN INDICATE THAT THE |
| WORK TO BE COMPLETED UNDER THIS PERMIT IS A COMMERCIAL |
| REMODEL. PLEASE SEE 2004 EXISTING BUILDING CODE- |
| BUILDINGW/ 2006 AMENDMENTS. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE |
| PLANS AS WELL AS THE LEVEL OF ALTERATIONS? |
| |
| 4A) SHEET A-102 THERE IS 2 NEW COLUMNS ON COLUMN LINE |
| A-2 & COLUMN LINE A-6 PLEASE PROVIDE A CUT SECTION |
| THROUGH THIS AREA, PLAN ARE NOT CLEAR AS TO THE |
| ANCHORING TO SLAB AND OR MAIN RESISTING SYSTEM FROM THE |
| ROOF THROUGH TO THE FOUNDATION. |
| |
| 4B) SHEET A-102 PLEASE PROVIDE A CUT SECTION THROUGH AT |
| GRADE TO INDICATE HOW THE COMPONENTS WILL ENTER ACT AT |
| GRADE OR IF SIDEWALK AT AIDE WALK. |
| 2603.9.2 CLEARANCE BETWEEN EARTH AND FOAM PLASTICS |
| APPLIED TO THE EXTERIOR WALL SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN 6 |
| INCHES (152 MM). |
| |
| 5A) SHEET A-102 INDICATES THAT THE EXISTING STOREFRONT |
| WILL BE REUSED, BUT THE PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED |
| HAVE ALUMIGLASS CURTAIN WALL SYSTEM AS PART OF THE |
| PACKAGE. |
| NOTE: THIS REPORT IF TO BE USED WILL NEED TO DIVIDE THE |
| PRESSURES BY 1.33 FOR HAVE A FLORIDA LICENSED P.E. |
| RESEARCH THE FASTENING SYSTEM. BEFORE THE 2004 FBC |
| MANUFACTURES TOOK STEEL INCREASES OF 1.33% ON THE |
| FASTENING SYSTEM. |
| |
| 5B) SHEETS A-101 AND A-102 BOTH INDICATE THE USE OF |
| EXTERIOR BI-FOLD DOORS, A 3?-0? |
| WIDE EXTERIOR SWING DOOR AND A 6?-0? WIDE SWING DOOR. |
| THE WERE NO PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED FOR THESE |
| OPENINGS AT ALL. 1609.1.4. |
| |
| 5C) THERE ARE NO DETAIL SHEETS HOW THE BI-FOLD DOORS |
| AND SWING DOORS WERE TESTED AS AN ASSEMBLY, NOTE IS |
| THERE A DOOR JAMB ON THE LATCH SIDE OF THE SWING DOOR, |
| DOES THE BI-FOLD DOOR HAVE WHAT TYPE OF LOCKING |
| ASSEMBLY THAT ALLOWS THE SWING DOOR TO LOCK INTO ITS |
| RAILS? 106.1.2* ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED. |
| |
| 5D) SUBMITTED ALSO ARE STORM SHUTTER PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| BUT THERE IS NO KEY PLAN INDICATING TO WHICH OPENINGS |
| THEY ARE TO BE PLACED? SHEET A-107 NOTE INDICATES NEW |
| STOREFRONTS WITH BI-FOLD DOORS, ARE THE STOREFRONT |
| WINDOWS GETTING REPLACED? |
| |
| 5E)EASTERN METAL ALSO WILL REQUIRE A FLORIDA COVER |
| SHEET.PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED WITH PERMIT |
| APPLICATION AFTER OCTOBER 1, 2003 ARE REQUIRED TO |
| COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL SYSTEM. FOR |
| INFORMATION PLEASE SEE THE STATE WEBSITE AT |
| WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG. PRODUCTS WITH STATEWIDE |
| APPROVAL ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH A COVER |
| SHEET THAT LISTS THE PRODUCT IDENTITY NUMBER FROM THE |
| STATE. IF THE PRODUCT DOES NOT HAVE STATEWIDE APPROVAL, |
| SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL OR |
| SITE SPECIFIC FORM PER RULE 9B-72. |
| |
| 5F) SHEET A-102 ALSO INDICATES THE USE OF A NEW ROOF |
| HATCH. RULE 9B-72 REQUIRES A PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SUCH |
| ROOF OPENINGS. CURRENTLY THERE ARE NONE AVAILABLE BUT |
| THERE ARE MANUFACTURERS CURRENTLY UNDERGOING TESTING |
| AND CERTIFICATION THROUGH MIAMI-DADE TESTING PROGRAM. |
| THIS ISSUE WILL BE A PROVISO:THAT IF THE MANUFACTURER |
| DOES NOT ACQUIRE A ACCEPTANCE REPORT THROUGH THE STATE |
| OR MIAMI-DADE THEN THE |
| MANUFACTURER WILL BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT TO THE CITY AND |
| ACQUIRE A LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL BEFORE A CERTIFICATE |
| OF COMPLETION WILL BE ISSUED. RULE 9B-72, 106.3.3.* |
| |
| 6A) SHEET A-103 STAIR# A111 HAS A PASSAGEWAY TO THE |
| EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING,THIS STAIRWAY HAS 2 DOORS |
| WHERE THE 18 ? IS MISSING ON THE PULL SIDE AT THE |
| LATCH. |
| 11-4.13.6 MANEUVERING CLEARENCES AT DOORS. MINIMUM |
| MANEUVERING CLEARANCES AT DOORS THAT ARE NOT AUTOMATIC |
| OR POWER-ASSISTED SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN |
| FIG. 25. THE FLOOR OR GROUND AREA WITH IN THE REQUIRED |
| CLEARANCES SHALL BE CLEAR & LEVEL. |
| |
| 6B) SHEET A-103 SERVICE TECH ROOM# 119 PLEASE SEE DOORS |
| IN SERIES: 11-4.13.7 TWO DOORS IN SERIES.THE MINIMUM |
| SPACE BETWEEN TWO HINGED OR PIVOTED DOORS IN SERIES |
| SHALL BE 48 INCHES (1219 MM) PLUS THE WIDTH OF ANY DOOR |
| SWINGING INTO THE SPACE. DOORS IN SERIES SHALL SWING |
| EITHER IN THE SAME DIRECTION OR AWAY FROM THE SPACE |
| BETWEEN THE DOORS [SEE FIGURE 26 (A)]. |
| |
| 6C) SHEET A-103 HAS SEVERAL COUNTER AREAS, RETAIL PARTS |
| BOUTIQUE, SERVICE TECH AREA AND CASHIERS STATION. ALL |
| SHOW VARIOUS DETAILS ON EITHER SHEET A-12 AND A-14. |
| THESE SHEETS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THESE PLANS OR |
| INDEX.PLEASE REVIEW REQUIREMENTS FOR SERVICE COUNTERS |
| FOR SALES OR DISTRIBUTION OF GOODS TO THE PUBLIC. |
| 11-4.7.2. PROVIDE ELEVATIONS SHOWING COMPLIANCE. |
| |
| 6D) SHEET A-103 THE WOMEN?S RESTROOM A117 HAS 2 DOORS |
| IN SERIES, 1A117B AND DOOR 2A117B THE SECOND DOOR DOES |
| NOT INDICATE WHAT THE USAGE WILL BE? PLEASE REVIEW |
| 11-4.13.7 TWO DOORS IN SERIES. |
| |
| 7)FL BLD CODE 1609.1.4: COMPONENTS & CLADDING, |
| PROVIDE 2 COPIES(3 IF THRESHOLD OR RESIDENT INSPECTOR) |
| OF PRODUCT TESTINGREPORTS, MISSING REPORTS ARE AS |
| FOLLOWS: |
| A) ROOF HATCH |
| B) EFIS SYSTEMS |
| C) ROOF ASSEMBLIES- WORK ON THE ROOF |
| |
| 8)PLEASE MAKE CORRECTION AS TO WORK THAT WILL BE |
| COMPLETED ON THE 2ND FLOOR IS RELATED TO A/C. PERMIT |
| APPLICATION. |
| |
| |
| |
| 102.1* WHERE, IN ANY SPECIFIC CASE, DIFFERENT SECTIONS |
| OF THIS CODE SPECIFY DIFFERENT MATERIALS, METHODS OF |
| CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS, THE MOST |
| RESTRICTIVE SHALL GOVERN. WHERE THERE IS A CONFLICT |
| BETWEEN A GENERAL REQUIREMENT AND A SPECIFIC |
| REQUIREMENT, THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENT SHALL BE |
| APPLICABLE. |
| |
| BUILDING PLAN REVIEW |
| JIM WITMER C. B. O. |
| BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| TEL: (561)805-6715 |
| FAX: (561)659-8026 |
| E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| |
| |