Plan Review Stops For Permit 07050102 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-12-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-12-11 |
Time |
12:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-12-11 |
Time |
12:33 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-12-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-12-04 |
Time |
12:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-12-04 |
Time |
12:38 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-11-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-11-05 |
Time |
13:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-11-05 |
Time |
12:39 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2007-11-05 13:43:55 | RESIDENTIAL ADDITION BUILDING REVIEW FOURTH CHECKLIST. | | REVIEW UNDER EXISTING BUILDING 2004 CODE, FLORIDA | | RESIDENTIAL CODE 2004 AND FBC 2004. | | | | 1- DESIGN PARAMETERS INFORMATION IS MISSING THE ATTIC | | LIVE LOAD AS REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5 OF 2004 FLORIDA | | RESIDENTIAL CODE. THIS IS THE FOURTH TIME THAT THIS | | INFORMATION IS REQUESTED. ARCHITECTTO PAY $524.80 AS | | REQUIRED BYFLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B) FOR PLAN | | REVIEW FEE. SEE ATTACHED COPY. | | | | ***NOTE: ONE COPY OF PLANS WILL BE RETAINED IN THIS | | OFFICE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTS FOR | | REVIEW. | | | | 2- ARCHITECT SPECIFIED CONSTRUCTION TYPE III. | | CONSTRUCTION TYPE III REQUIRES A TWO HOUR WALL ASSEMBLY | | AS REQUIRED BY TABLE 601 FBC 2004, THEREFORE,NEED TO | | PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS FOR 2 HOUR FIRE | | RATED CONCRETE BLOCK.ALSO, ARCHITECT TO SPECIFYIF | | CONSTRUCTION TYPEIS A OR B. SEE TABLE 601 FBC 2004. | | | | 3- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AS REQUIRED BY | | SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA STATUTE. THIS MAY BE PROVIDED WHEN | | PICKING UP THE PERMIT. | | | | 4- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: ONE OF THE COPIES IS MISSING | | THE INFORMATION ON TABLE 6C-1 AND TABLE 6C-2. COMPLETE | | INFORMATION AS REQUIRED. | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-10-11 |
Time |
14:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-10-11 |
Time |
14:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-10-11 14:30:38 | RESIDENTIAL ADDITION BUILDING REVIEW THIRD CHECKLIST. | | REVIEW DONE UNDER 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE, | | EXISTING BUILDING CODE 2004AND 2004 FBC 2004 WITH | | 2006 REVISIONS. | | | | 1-PLANS NEED TO CLEARLY SPECIFY ALL DESIGN LOADS, | | WIND LOADS, LIVE LOADS AND DEAD LOADS,INCLUDING THE | | ATTICLIVE LOAD AS REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5 OF 2004 | | FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE.INFORMATION SUBMITTED UNDER | | DESIGN PARAMETERS ON SHEET 1 OF 4 DOESN'T MAKE SENSE. | | ITSHOWS LIVE LOAD OF 30 AND DEAD LOAD OF 15. WHAT ARE | | THESE LOADS FOR?.FLOOR, ROOF?.IT'S NOT CLEAR.ON | | THE OTHER HAND AT BOTTOM OFDESIGN PARAMETERS | | INFORMATION IT STATES "TOTAL ROOF DEAD LOAD OF 45". HOW | | WAS THIS LOAD ACHIEVED?.PROVIDECALCULATIONS. | | SECTION 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004.PROVIDE | | CLEAR AND COORDINATEDINFORMATION SHOWING DESIGN LOADS | | FOR ROOF TOP CHORD LIVE AND DEAD LOADS ANDROOF BOTTOM | | CHORD LIVE AND DEAD LOADS. THIS IS THE INFORMATION | | REQUIRED FOR THE DESIGN OF ROOF TRUSSES. SEC. 106.1.2 | | CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | ***NOTES:A) SEE ATTACHED COPY OF SEC. 553.80(2)(B) | | REGARDING DESIGN PROFESSIONAL DOCUMENTS AND MULTIPLE | | PLAN REVIEW FAILURES. | | B) ONE COPY OF PLANS WILL BE | | RETAINED IN THIS OFFICE FOR FUTURE SUBMITTAL TO THE | | BOARD OF ARCHITECTS FOR REVIEW. | | | | 2- THIS IS AN ADDITION, NOT ALTERATION LEVEL 3.SEE | | CHAPTER 9 OF EXISTING BUILDING 2004 CODE AND SCOPE OF | | WORK SPECIFIED ON PLANS AND REVISE INFORMATION AS | | REQUIRED. | | | | 3- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AS REQUIRED BY | | SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA STATUTE. | | | | 4- ARCHITECT PROVIDED PRODUCT APPROVAL WITH THE REVIEW | | STAMP, BUT FAILED TO MARK ACTION TAKEN.STAMP DOESN'T | | STATE IF PRODUCT APPROVALWAS DENIED OR APPROVED. | | PROVIDE INFORMATION AS REQUIRED. SEC. 106.3.3 CITY | | AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | 5- MISSING THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | 13-600 FBC 2004. | | | | 6- MISSING PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SIMPSON CONNECTORS | | SPECIFIED ON PLANS. REQUIRED BY DCA RULE 9B-72. | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | (561) 805-6712 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-08-16 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-08-16 |
Time |
12:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-08-16 |
Time |
12:54 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-08-16 13:42:37 | ADDITION BUILDING REVIEW SECOND CHECKLIST: | | REVIEW DONE UNDER 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE AND FBC | | 2004. | | | | 1- PROVIDE COPY OF IMPACT FEES PAID RECEIPTAS | | REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS CHECKLIST: | | | | 2- PLANS NEED TO SPECIFY ALL DESIGN LOADS, INCLUDING | | THE ATTIC LIVE LOAD AS REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5 OF 2004 | | FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE AND AS REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS | | CHECKLIST. | | | | 3- SPECIFY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | 602.1 FBC 2004 AND SEC. 106.3.5.4 OF CITY AMENDMENTS TO | | FBC 2004. THIS ITEM WAS ALSO REQUESTED ON PREVIOUS | | CHECKLIST. | | | | 4- STORM SHUTTERS: | | A) INSTALLATION SCHEDULE SUBMITTED: | | (1) PROVIDE COMPLETE AND CORRECTINSTALLATION | | SCHEDULE. | | (2)REVISE PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBERS ON TOP OF FORM. | | SEE SUBMITTED PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR CORRECT NUMBERS.. | | (3) REVISE DESIGN PRESSURES. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS | | FOR CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. | | (4) REVISE INFORMATION GIVEN ON SHUTTER MOUNTING | | COLUMN (COLUMN 4). LOOK AT SHUTTERS DRAWINGS AND | | SPECIFY TYPE OF MOUNTING. EG: WALL MOUNTED, BUILT OUT | | MOUNT, ETC.SPECIFIC MOUNTING CONDITION IS REQUIRED | | SINCE THERE ARE MANY DIFFERENT MOUNTING CONDITIONS AND | | TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH PROPOSED INSTALLATION. SEC. | | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | (5) WHAT'S THE SHUTTER GLASS SEPARATION.SEE | | SHUTTERS DRAWINGS FOR REQUIRED SEPARATION. | | (6) SPECIFY ANCHOR SPACING. | | | | B) CIRCLE ON SHUTTERSDRAWINGS SPECIFIC MOUNTING | | CONDITIONS AND ANCHOR TYPE AND SPACING TO BE USED. SEC. | | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | C) PROVIDE LEGIBLE DRAWINGS. DRAWING SUBMITTED ARE | | NOT LEGIBLE. | | | | 5- TRUSS PACKAGE: | | A) COMPLETE PACKAGE NEEDS TO HAVE ALL THE ENGINEER'S | | INFORMATION AND ALL DRAWINGS TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED AS | | REQUIRED BY SEC. 61G15-23.002 AND CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA | | STATUTE. | | NOTE: COPY OF SIGNATURE IS NOT ALLOWED. | | | | B) COMPLETE TRUSS PACKAGE NEED TO BE REVIEWED AND | | APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD. NOT SIGNED AND | | SEALED BY HIM. | | NOTE: ARCHITECT CAN'T SIGN AND SEAL THESE DRAWINGS | | BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT DONE BY HIM. SEE CHAPTER 481 | | FLORIDA STATUTES. | | | | 6- SHEET 1 OF 4: | | A) THIS IS AN ADDITION, NOT ALTERATION TYPE 2.SEE | | CHAPTER 9 OF EXISTING FBC 2004 AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | | | B) TOTAL ROOF DEAD LOAD LINE SHOWS 30PSF, WHILE DEAD | | LOAD LINE SHOWS 25PSF. REVISE AND COORDINATE AS | | REQUIRED.ALSO SEEITEM#2ABOVE. | | | | 7- REVISE GABLE END WALL SECTION. | | A) ROOF SHEATHING NAIL SPACING NEEDS TO BE REVISED | | FOR ROOF ZONE 3. SEE SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA | | RESIDENTIAL CODE AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | B) USP CONNECTORSPECIFIED DOESN'T MATCH CONNECTOR | | SPECIFIED ON ROOF FRAMING PLAN AND TRUSS ANCHOR | | SCHEDULE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | 8- REVISE ROOF SHEATHING NAIL SPACING SPECIFIED ON | | TYPICAL WALL SECTION.SEE SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 | | FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE FOR NAIL SPACING AT ROOF ZONE | | #3 AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | 9- TYPICAL WALL SECTION TITLE CALLS FOR 1'-6" O.H. | | WHILE TYP. WALL SECTION DRAWINGS SHOW 24" OVERHANG. | | REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. | | | | 10- CLARIFY WHY ARCHITECT REVIEWED AND APPROVED PRECAST | | LINTEL PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR 4", 6 AND 12" PRECAST | | LINTELS IF THERE ARE NOT LINTELS THIS SIZE?. SEE | | PLANS. | | | | 11- NEED RECORDED NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AS REQUIRED BY | | SEC. 713.13 FLORIDA STATUTE. | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | (561)805-6712 |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-08-14 |
Time |
12:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-06-20 |
Time |
16:45 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-06-20 16:47:57 | BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST: | | 1- AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH | | COUNTY FOR IMPACT FEES (2300N. JOG RD (561)233-5115). | | BRING BACK STAMPED PLANS AND COPY OF PAID RECEIPT IF | | ADDITIONAL FEES ARE DUE. | | | | 2- PERMIT VALUATION WAS UPDATED AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | 108.3CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. THEREFORE, OWES | | $80.19 FOR UPDATED VALUATION AND RADON FEES. | | | | 3- PLANS NEED TO SPECIFY ALL DESIGN LOADS, INCLUDING | | THE ATTIC LIVE LOADS AS REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.5 OF | | 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE. | | | | 4- SPECIFY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED BY SEC. | | 602.1 FBC 2004. | | | | 5- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL AS REQUIRED BY DCA RULE | | 9B-72 FOR: | | A) ALL SIMPSON CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. | | | | B) ROOF SHINGLES. NOA 04-0820.01 SUBMITTED WAS | | SUPERSEDED ACCORDING TO DADE COUNTY PRODUCT APPROVAL | | WEBSITE. SEE ATTACHED COPY.NEED TO PROVIDE CURRENT | | NOA OR PRODUCT APPROVAL. | | ***NOTE: IF PROVIDING FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL FL 183 | | MAKE SURE NOA SUBMITTED CORRESPONDS TO SAME NOA | | SUBMITTED FOR FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL.GO THE THE | | FLORIDA WEBSITE WWW.FLORIDABUILDING.ORG AND DOWNLOAD | | CORRESPONDING NOA THAT WAS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL. | | | | 6- ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS NEED TO BE REVIEWED AND | | APPROVED IN WRITING BY ARCHITECT OF RECORD. | | ***NOTE: ONE PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR SINGLE HUNG WINDOW IS | | MISSING THE ARCHITECT'S APPROVAL ON ONE COPY.ONLY THE | | APPROVAL STAMP WAS SUBMITTED WITHOUT THE ARCHITECT'S | | SIGNATURE. AND, MAKE SURE PRODUCT APPROVALS LISTED | | ABOVE ARE APPROVED ALSO. | | | | 7- STORM SHUTTERS: | | A) PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. SEE | | ATTACHED SAMPLE AND COMPLETE ALL THE INFORMATION. | | | | B) CIRCLE ON ENGINEERED DRAWINGS SPECIFIC MOUNTING | | CONDITIONS AND ANCHOR TYPE AND SPACING TO BE USED. SEC. | | 106.1.2 CITY AMENDMENTS TO FBC 2004. | | | | C) PROVIDE LEGIBLE DRAWINGS. | | | | 8- ENERGY CALCULATIONS: | | A) PROVIDE REVISED FORM 600C-04 R. | | | | B) COMPLETE ALL INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM. | | | | C) REVISE PREDOMINANT EAVE OVERHANG LENGTH. SEE | | PLANS. | | | | D) OWNER/AGENT TO SIGN AND DATE BOTTOM OF FORM. | | | | 9- TRUSS PACKAGE: | | A) COMPLETE PACKAGE NEEDS TO HAVE ALL THE ENGINEER'S | | INFORMATION AND NEEDSTO BE SIGNED AND SEALED AS | | REQUIRED BYCHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTE AND SEC. | | 61G15-23.002 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE.BOTH | | COPIES. | | | | B) COMPLETE TRUSS PACKAGE NEEDS TO BE APPROVED BY THE | | ARCHITECT OF RECORD. | | | | C) PROVIDE COMPLETE AND CORRECT TRUSS PACKAGE | | INFORMATION TO THE BUILDING INSPECTOR AT TIME OF | | FRAMING INSPECTION. | | | | | | 10- SHEET 1 OF 4:. | | A)THIS IS NOT AN ALTERATION LEVEL 2. SEE SEC. 307 OF | | EXISTING BUILDING CODE AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | B) TOTAL ROOF DEAD LOAD LINE IN DESIGN PARAMETERS | | INFORMATION IS BLANK. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | 11- SHEET 2 OF 4: THIS IS NOT A FLOOR PLAN ADDITION | | REVISION TO PERMIT 06080496. THIS IS A COMPLETE | | SEPARATE PERMIT. REVISE NOTES AS REQUIRED. | | | | 12- SHEET 3 OF 4: | | A) FOUNDATION PLAN NOTE REGARDING 8"X12" POURED | | COLUMN DOESN'T MATCH INFORMATION SHOWN ON WALL AND BEAM | | ATTACHMENT DETAIL ON SHEET 4 OF 4. REVISE AS REQUIRED | | TO MATCH. | | | | B) GABLE END DETAIL: | | * WHERE IS THE ROOF SHEATHING AND WALL SHEATHING | | SCHEDULE?. | | ** USP STRAP SPECIFIED DOESN'T MATCH INFORMATION | | GIVEN ON ROOF FRAMING PLAN. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH | | AND SEE TRUSS CONNECTOR CATALOG FOR PROPER SIZE AND | | NUMBER OF FASTENERS REQUIRED. SEC. 106.1.2 CITY | | AMENDMENTS STO FBC 2004. | | | | 13- SHEET 4 OF 4: | | A) INFORMATION ON FOOTING ATTACHMENT DETAIL IS NOT | | LEGIBLE. SEE MINIMUM EMBEDEMENT. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | B) TYPICAL WALL SECTION: | | * INSTALLING SHINGLES OR CEMENT TILE.ROOF LOADING | | IS DIFFERENT. REVISE AS REQUIRED. | | | | ** REVISE TYPE OF NAIL REQUIRED FOR ROOF SHEATHING. | | SEE SEC. R803.2.3.1 OF 2004 FLORIDA RESIDENTIAL CODE | | FOR MIN. TYPE OF NAIL REQUIRED. | | | | *** REVISE TRUSS CONNECTOR TO MATCH TRUSS ANCHOR | | SCHEDULE. | | | | JULIO GOMEZ | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | (561)805-6712 | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
7 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-12-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-12-11 |
Time |
13:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-12-11 |
Time |
08:00 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-11-26 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-11-26 |
Time |
07:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-11-26 |
Time |
06:47 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-11-26 07:42:58 | | | | | REVISION DENIED/INCOMPLETE INFORMATION | | | | THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES: | | | | THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2006 REVISIONS, 2004 | | RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE, 2005 NEC, NFPA-72 2002, | | NFPA-101 2003, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, CHAPTER 1.AND FOUND | | NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | | 1} THE REVISION IS NOT CLEARLY INDICATED BY CLOUDING, | | DELTA'S OR ANY OTHER USUAL TYPE OF MARKING THAT WOULD | | INDICATE THE CHANGES TO THE PLAN. PLEASE INDICATE SAME | | AND RESUBMIT. 106.1.1 FBC AS AMENDED. | | | | 2} PER FLORIDA STATUTE 481.221 (4):NO REGISTERED | | ARCHITECT SHALL AFFIX, OR PERMIT TO BE AFFIXED, HER OR | | HIS SEAL OR SIGNATURE TO ANY FINAL CONSTRUCTION | | DOCUMENT OR INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE WHICH INCLUDES ANY | | PLAN, SPECIFICATION, DRAWING, OR OTHER DOCUMENT WHICH | | DEPICTS WORK WHICH SHE OR HE IS NOT COMPETENT TO | | PERFORM. THE SIGNATURE ON THE PLANS IS NOT THE SAME | | SIGNATURE ON THE PERMITTED SET. SUBMIT DOCUMENTATION | | INDICATING THE SIGNATURE OF THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD, | | SIGNED AND NOTORIZED. | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561/805-6718 |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-11-05 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-11-05 |
Time |
07:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-11-05 |
Time |
06:47 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-12-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-11-05 |
Time |
07:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-11-05 |
Time |
07:45 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-11-05 07:45:11 | | | | | OPENED IN ERROR./WRT. | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-10-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-10-01 |
Time |
12:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-10-01 |
Time |
11:57 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-10-01 12:29:10 | | | | | THIS REVIEW WAS DONE UNDER THESE CURRENT CODE CYCLES: | | | | THE 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 2006 REVISIONS, 2004 | | RESIDENTIAL BUILDING CODE, 2005 NEC, NFPA-72 2002, | | NFPA-101 2003, 2004 FBC AS AMENDED, CHAPTER 1.AND FOUND | | NONCOMPLIANT WITH THE FOLLOWING: | | | | 1} THE WATER HEATER IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE LOAD | | CALCULATION PER 220.82(A)(4). INDICATE WHY THE WATER | | HEATER IS NOT IN THE 150 AMP PANEL. | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561/805-6718 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-08-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-08-14 |
Time |
07:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-08-13 |
Time |
16:52 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2007-08-14 07:38:26 | | | | | | | NONCOMPLIANT | | | | PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS FOR CODE | | COMPLIANCE AND RESUBMIT FOR REVIEW. | | | | THESE COMMENTS ARE UNANSWERED FROM THE PREVIOUS | | REVIEW. | | | | COMMENTS MARKED WITH* ARE ADDITIONAL | | | | 1} LOCATE THE NEW WATER HEATER AND DISCONNECTON THE | | PLAN SO THAT COMPLIANCE WITH 110.26 AND 240.24 CAN BE | | DETERMINED. | | | | 2} THE 2 #4 FEEDERS TO THE WATER HEATER DISCONNECTON | | THE RISER DO NOT CORRELATE WITH THE #8CONDUCTORS IN | | THE PANEL SCHEDULE, AND A #6 ON A NOTE ON THE PLAN. | | CORRELATE SAME.REMOVE ALL NOTES AND CALCULATIONS NOT | | PERTINENT FOR RECORD KEEPING FROM THE PLAN FOR | | CLARITY. | | | | 3} THE FEEDER FOR THE WATER HEATER MUST GROUNDED PER | | 250.110 SIZED PER 250.122. | | | | 4} OK | | | | 5} THE FACT THAT THE 60 AMP DISCONNECT IS SHOWN "DOUBLE | | LUGGED" FROM THE METER, REQUIRES THAT IT BE SERVICE | | RATED PER 225.36. AND * GROUPED PER 230.70(A)(1) | | | | 6} 225.34(A) GENERAL THE TWO TO SIX DISCONNECTS AS | | PERMITTED IN 225.33 SHALL BE GROUPED. EACH DISCONNECT | | SHALL BE MARKED TO INDICATE THE LOAD SERVED. ALSO SEE | | 230.72(A) | | | | 7} THE WATER HEATER IS LISTEDIN THE PANEL SCHEDULE ON | | A 40 AMP BREAKER, BUT INDICATED AS HAVING A SEPARATE | | DISCONNECT ON THE RISER, CORRELATE SAME. | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561/805-6718 |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-05-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-05-07 |
Time |
09:52 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2007-05-07 |
Time |
07:13 |
Sent To |
M |
|
Notes |
2007-05-07 07:53:43 | | | | | NONCOMPLIANT | | | | PLEASE MAKE THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS FOR CODE | | COMPLIANCE AND RESUBMIT FOR REVIEW. | | | | 1} LOCATE THE NEW WATER HEATER AND DISCONNECTON THE | | PLAN SO THAT COMPLIANCE WITH 110.26 AND 240.24 CAN BE | | DETERMINED. | | | | 2} THE 2 #4 FEEDERS TO THE WATER HEATER DISCONNECTON | | THE RISER DO NOT CORRELATE WITH THE #8CONDUCTORS IN | | THE PANEL SCHEDULE, AND A #6 ON A NOTE ON THE PLAN. | | CORRELATE SAME.REMOVE ALL NOTES AND CALCULATIONS NOT | | PERTINENT FOR RECORD KEEPING FROM THE PLAN FOR | | CLARITY. | | | | 3} THE FEEDER FOR THE WATER HEATER MUST GROUNDED PER | | 250.110 SIZED PER 250.122. | | | | 4} THE CIRCUIT NUMBERS ON THE PANEL SCHEDULE ARE | | INCORRECT AND ARE DUPLICATED. SEE 408.4 2005 NEC | | REGARDING"SPECIFIC PURPOSE OR USE". | | | | 5} THE FACT THAT THE 60 AMP DISCONNECT IS SHOWN "DOUBLE | | LUGGED" FROM THE METER, REQUIRES THAT IT BE SERVICE | | RATED PER 225.36. | | | | 6} 225.34(A) GENERAL THE TWO TO SIX DISCONNECTS AS | | PERMITTED IN 225.33 SHALL BE GROUPED. EACH DISCONNECT | | SHALL BE MARKED TO INDICATE THE LOAD SERVED. ALSO SEE | | 230.72(A) | | | | 7} THE WATER HEATER IS LISTEDIN THE PANEL SCHEDULE ON | | A 40 AMP BREAKER, BUT INDICATED AS HAVING A SEPARATE | | DISCONNECT ON THE RISER, CORRELATE SAME. | | | | 8} THE ADDITION TO THE BEDROOMS DO NOT COMPLY WITH | | 210.52(A)(1) & (2) FOR RECEPTACLE SPACING. | | | | IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL. | | | | BILL TROBAUGH | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561/805-6718 |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-12-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-12-10 |
Time |
14:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-12-10 |
Time |
14:01 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-12-10 14:02:15 | TO "BTROBAUG" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-11-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-21 |
Time |
08:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-21 |
Time |
08:45 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-11-21 08:45:41 | TO "BTROBAUG" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-11-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-02 |
Time |
11:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-02 |
Time |
11:53 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-11-02 11:53:52 | TO "BTROBAUG" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-09-27 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-27 |
Time |
10:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-09-27 |
Time |
10:13 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2007-09-27 10:13:42 | TO "Z" BOX/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-08-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-08-06 |
Time |
16:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-08-06 |
Time |
16:49 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-08-06 16:50:25 | TO "BTROBAUG" DESK/RESUB |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-06-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-06-20 |
Time |
16:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jgomez |
Date |
2007-05-03 |
Time |
14:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-05-03 14:16:34 | TO "SFR" "Z" |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-08-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-08-14 |
Time |
10:38 |
Rev Time |
0.20 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-08-14 |
Time |
10:38 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-08-14 10:42:52 | MECHANICAL PERMIT #07050104 HAS BEEN VOIDED AND NO | | MECHANICAL WORK IS TO BE DONE. |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-05-07 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-05-07 |
Time |
11:55 |
Rev Time |
0.25 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-05-07 |
Time |
11:55 |
Sent To |
P |
|
Notes |
2007-05-07 11:57:55 | *** DENIED *** | | 1) ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE ON FORM600C-04R, | | SEE 2004 FBC 13-600.3.C (12-8-06 REVISION). | | | | 1) ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE SIGNED BY OWNER/AGENT | | ALSO, PER 2004 FBC 13-600.3.ABC.2. | | | | 2) MECHANICAL PERMIT #07050104 HAS BEEN APPLIED FOR BUT | | NO MECHANICAL PLANS WERE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW. PLEASE | | SUBMIT MECHANICAL PLANS FOR REVIEW, PER 2004 FBC CITY | | OF WPB AMEND. 106.3.5.4 (10). | | | | MECHANICAL PLAN REVIEW BY; | | TOM GORDON (561) 805-6729. |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-05-10 |
Time |
07:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
jleech |
Date |
2007-05-10 |
Time |
07:09 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2007-05-10 07:11:37 | NO PLUMBING SHOWN ON PLANS |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-10-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2007-10-01 |
Time |
09:11 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
choops |
Date |
2007-10-01 |
Time |
09:11 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-10-01 09:13:05 | ***PASSED - RESUB #2*** |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-05-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
choops |
Date |
2007-05-04 |
Time |
11:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
choops |
Date |
2007-05-04 |
Time |
11:21 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2007-05-04 11:27:52 | BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED 30' |
|
|