Plan Review Stops For Permit 07050076 |
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-12-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-12-17 |
Time |
11:48 |
Rev Time |
0.55 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-12-17 |
Time |
11:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-09-13 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-09-13 |
Time |
13:06 |
Rev Time |
2.22 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-09-13 |
Time |
13:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-09-13 13:14:52 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 07050076 | | ADD: 1817 S DIXIE HWY | | CONT: JEFFERY GOMERSALL BUILDING | | TEL: (561718-1867 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | 2NDREVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | NEW COMMENT:THE FIRST GENERATION OF PLANS SUBMITTED | | INDICATED HANDICAPPED PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE AISLES, | | THIS 2ND SET OF PLANS DOESN'T INDICATE ANY ACCESSIBLE | | SPACES.11-4.1.6(2) DUTY TO PROVIDE AN | | ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL TO ALTERED AREAS SHALL BE | | DEEMED DISPROPORTIONATE TO THE OVERALL ALTERATION WHEN | | THE COST EXCEEDS 20 % OF THE COST OF THE ALTERATION TO | | THE PRIMARY FUNCTION AREA. | | (A)(I) AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE | | (II) AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE | | (III) AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE RESTROOM FOR EACH SEX | | OR A SINGLE UNISEX RESTROOM | | (IIII) ACCESSIBLE TELEPHONE | | (IV) ELEMENTS SUCH AS PARKING, STORAGE OR ALARMS. | | | | 102.1* WHERE, IN ANY SPECIFIC CASE, DIFFERENT SECTIONS | | OF THIS CODE SPECIFY DIFFERENT MATERIALS, METHODS OF | | CONSTRUCTION OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS, THE MOST | | RESTRICTIVE SHALL GOVERN. WHERE THERE IS A CONFLICT | | BETWEEN A GENERAL REQUIREMENT AND A SPECIFIC | | REQUIREMENT, THE SPECIFIC | | REQUIREMENT SHALL BE APPLICABLE. | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW II | | | | | | | | | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-15 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-06-15 |
Time |
17:05 |
Rev Time |
1.11 |
Received By |
jwitmer |
Date |
2007-06-15 |
Time |
17:05 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2007-06-15 17:17:25 | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | PERMIT: 07050076 | | ADD: 1817 S DIXIE HWY | | CONT: JEFFERY GOMERSALL BUILDING | | TEL: (561718-1867 | | | | | | FL BLD CODE= 2004 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | W/ 2006 FBC REVISIONS | | * WEST PALM BEACH AMENDMENTS | | | | REVIEW | | ACTION: DENIED | | | | NOTE: SITE WALL WAS STRUCK FROM THE PERMIT APPLICATION | | AND THE VALUE DROPPED TO REFLECT SUCH WORK BEING | | DROPPED. PLEASE REMOSE THE S1 AND S2 THAT PERTAIN TO | | THE SITE WALL. | | SITE WALL WILL REQUIRE A SEPERATE PERMIT, FEES AND | | REVIEW. | | | | 1)--- VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENT --- | | PLEASE DO NOT IGNORE! | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE THE REVISION & | | REMOVE & REPLACE ANY PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL | | LETTER LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, WITH | | A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION MADE, IDENTIFYING THE | | SHEET OR SPECIFICATION PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE | | FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR | | ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | 2)) FL S S 713.13NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT, TO BE | | FILED WITH THE CLERK OF THE COURT.NOTE: 713.13(2) IF | | THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THE NOTICE OFCOMMENCEMENT IS | | NOT ACTUALLYCOMMENCED WITHIN 90 DAYS AFTER THE | | RECORDING THEREOF, SUCH NOTICE IS NULL & VOID. NOTE: | | 713.13(6)THE POSTING OF THE NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT AT | | THE CONSTRUCTION SITE BEFORE THE FIRST INSPECTION. | | | | 3) 3) PLEASESEE AREA CALCULATION, LS1 INDICATES 2293 | | SQ FT AND E0THE AREA INDICATED ON THE PLANS IS 2421. | | | | 4) PLANS SUBMITTED AFTER DEC 8, 2006 ARE TO BE DESIGNED | | TO THE 2006 FBC, BUILDING. | | | | BUILDING PLAN REVIEW | | JIM WITMER C. B. O. | | | | TEL: (561)805-6715 | | FAX: (561)659-8026 | | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-07-08 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-07-08 |
Time |
15:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
btrobaug |
Date |
2008-07-08 |
Time |
14:52 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-03-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-03-14 |
Time |
08:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2008-03-14 |
Time |
08:01 |
Sent To |
PC |
|
Notes |
2008-03-14 08:02:15 | REV #3 |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-10-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-10-31 |
Time |
16:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-10-31 |
Time |
16:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-09-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-09-04 |
Time |
08:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-09-04 |
Time |
07:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-09-04 08:20:38 | 2007-09-04 08:20:38 | | | | ** DENIED2ND REVIEW** | | | | ** PLEASE SEE THE COMMENT BELOW FROM THE PREVIOUS | | REVIEW. | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE BE SURE WHEN TYPING RESPONSE LETTERS TO | | ACCURATELY DEPICT THE NOTES FORM THE REVIEWER AS TYPED | | OR NOTED. PLEASE SEE NOTE #8 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW | | WHICH HAS CODES AND SECTIONS MIS-QUOTED FORM THE | | PREVIOUS REVIEW. | | THIS COULD VERY WELL LEAD TO CONFUSION OR | | MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE NOTES. | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE SEE NOTE #8 FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW. | | THE RESPONSE FROM DESIGNER SPEAKS OFLOADS AS BEING | | DETERMINED FROM THE NEC FOR LOAD CALCULATIONS WHEREAS | | THE NOTE HAD TO DO THE FBC CHAPTER 13 FOR LIGHTING | | LOADS. | | THE*MINIMUM* LOADS FIGURED FOR LIGHTING IN THE | | SERVICE CALCULATIONS FOR SIZING A SERVICE AND BRANCH | | CIRCUITS AS REQUIRED IN THE NEC (220) IS COMPLETELY | | DIFFERENT THAN THE MAXIMUM LOADS FOR LIGHTING | | ALLOWANCES PER THE FLORIDA ENERGY CODE. | | PLEASE SEE THE PREVIOUS REVIEW NOTE #8 WHICH SPOKE OF | | THE LOADS TO BE FIGURED FOR TRACK LIGHTING PER | | 13-415.2.ABC.1.2. THIS IS A MAXIMUM ALLOWANCE BASED ON | | THE TRACK LIGHTING FIXTURES OR LENGTH OF TRACK BASED ON | | A MINIMUM AS SET FORTH BY THE FBC DEPENDING ON THE TYPE | | OF TRACK LIGHTING BEING INSTALLED. | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE MAXIMUM LIGHTING ALLOWANCES PER | | 13-415.2 | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE INFORMATION FOR THESE MAXIMUM | | LIGHTING LEVELS. | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE AS OF THE THREE NEW SETS SUBMITTED | | ONLY TWO SETS ARE COMPLETED BEING SIGNED, AND SEALED. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY TWO ARE NEEDED HOWEVER IF THREE IS | | BEING SUBMITTED AND WANTING TO BE STAMPED FOR | | PERMITTING AND CONTRACTOR'S FIELD SETS THESE WOULD ALL | | NEED TO BE SIGNED, DATED AND SEALED. | | *PLEASE SEE THE A-SHEETS IN ONE SET. | | | | PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | REVIEWER. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] | 2007-09-04 07:38:23 | 2007-09-04 07:38:23 | | | | IN ELEC FOR REVIEW |
|
|
Review Stop |
E |
ELECTRICAL |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-05-17 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-05-17 |
Time |
10:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
dpalmer |
Date |
2007-05-17 |
Time |
08:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-05-17 10:50:57 | ** UNSAT** | | | | ** PLEASE SEE REFERENCES TO CHAPTER 1 OF THE FLORIDA | | BUILDING CODE IS THE ADMINISTRATIVE SECTION AS ADOPTED | | BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH. | | | | | | 1) NOTE: PLEASE SEE PLANS MUST REFLECT CURRENT CODES IN | | EFFECT AND ADOPTED BY THE STATE IN THE SCOPE OF WORK AS | | SHOWN. | | PLEASE KNOW HOWEVER AT THIS TIME AND AS OF DECEMBER | | 8TH, 2006 THE STATE IS UNDER THE 2004 FBC W/2006 | | REVISIONS. THESE ARE ONLY REVISIONS TO THE 2004 FBC. | | PLEASE ALSO SEE THE PLANS INDICATE * PALM BEACH COUNTY* | | LOCAL AMENDMENTS. | | SOME OF THESE ARE STATED ON ELECTRICAL HOWEVER SHOULD | | ALSO BE ON COVER SHEETS. | | WE ARE UNDER THE 2005 NFPA-70. (NEC). | | PLEASE ALSO LIST THE FOLLOWING. | | 2003 NFPA-101 | | 2002 NFPA-72 | | | | 2) NOTE: PLEASE VERIFY THE LOCATION OF PROJECT AS THE | | SITE/LOCATION PLAN INDICATES TWO LOCATIONS. | | FBC 106.1.2 | | | | 3) NOTE: PLEASE SEE THE VALUE FOR THE COMPLETE SCOPE OF | | WORK IS TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR AND MATERIALS EVEN IF ANY | | EQUIPMENT/MATERIALS ETC ARE OWNER SUPPLIED. | | FBC 108.3 | | | | 4) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 408.4 AS THE PANEL SCHEDULE | | SUBMITTED IS NOT COMPLETE AND NEEDS TO CONTAIN | | SPECIFICS FOR CIRCUITING TO ROOMS AND AREAS IN WHICH | | THEY FEED. | | PLEASE ALSO INCLUDE EXISTING CIRCUITING AS THERE ARE | | REQUIRED ITEMS MISSING NOT ON PANEL SCHEDULE. *SEE NOTE | | FOR LOAD CALCULATIONS. | | | | 5) NOTE: PLEASE SEE 600.5 FOR MISSING SIGN CIRCUIT. NEW | | ORE EXISTING? | | 408.4, 220, ETC. | | | | 6) NOTE: PLEASE SEE MISSING SHOW WINDOW RECEPTACLES PER | | 210.62. NEW OR EXISTING? | | PLEASE ALSO SEE 220.43 FOR LOADS. | | | | 7) NOTE: PLEASE COMPLETE AND COORDINATE LOAD | | CALCULATIONS. PLEASE SEE THE CODE SECTIONS REFLECTED | | ARE THAT FROM THE PREVIOUS CODE. PLEASE SEE THE | | RECEPTACLE LOAD MAY NOT BE USED AS 1VA PER FT, WHEN A | | KNOWN RECEPTACLE LOAD IS AVAILABLE. PLEASE SEE THAT THE | | PLANS MENTIONS ALL RECEPTACLES ARE EXISTING, HOWEVER | | NOT SHOWN, SO PLEASE CORRELATE. | | PLEASE SEE OTHER NOTES FOR RECEPTACLES. | | PLEASE SEE THAT LOADS SHOWN BELOW PANEL SCHEDULE DO NOT | | CORRELATE WITH THAT OF THE LOAD CALCULATIONS ON THE | | SAME SHEET. | | PLEASE SEE THE 2005 NEC.220. | | | | 8) NOTE: PLEASE CLARIFY THE BUILDING. AT THIS TIME THIS | | SPACE APPEARS TO BE PART OF A LARGER BUILDING AND MAY | | NOT MEET THE DEFINITION OF BUILDING. | | PLEASE SEE FBC CHAPTER 1313-415.1.ABC.1.1, .1.2 AND | | .1.3 FOR POSSIBLE LIGHTING CONTROLS REQUIRED. PLEASE | | SEE 13-415.2 AS PERFORMANCE CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED | | FOR ANY SIZE BUILDING. | | PLEASE SEE 13-415.2.ABC.1.2 FOR TRACK LIGHTING LOADS TO | | BE SHOWN. (HIGHER OF THE TWO AS SHOWN BASED ON FIXTURES | | OR LINEAR FT OF TRACK) FOR 120V SYSTEMS. | | | | ** PLEASE KNOW AS SOME ITEMS ARE NOT CLEAR AT THIS | | TIME, ALL COMMENTS FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND REVIEW CAN | | NOT BE DONE AT THIS TIME. | | | | * ** IMPORTANT** | | ONCE ALL REVIEWS ARE DONE AND PLANS ARE | | PICKED UP FOR CORRECTIONS, PLEASE BE | | SURE TO COMPLETELY REMOVE ALL OLD/VOIDED | | SHEETS AND ONLY INSERT NEW REVISED | | SHEETS INTO TWO COMPLETE SETS FOR REVIEW | | AND STAMPING. DO NOT LEAVE ANY | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS IN SETS. | | PLEASE KNOW ONLY ONE SET OF THE | | OLD/VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE SUBMITTED | | FOR REFERENCE. | | THIS WILL HELP IN THE REVIEW PROCESS AND | | AVOID ANY DELAYS. | | | | ** PLEASE BE SURE TO CALL IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS OR | | COMMENTS WITH RESPECT TO THE TYPED COMMENTS ABOVE. IF | | THERE ARE ANY COMMENTS WHICH ARE NOT CLEAR IN ANY WAY, | | NOT UNDERSTOOD OR NOT TYPED IN A CLEAR MANOR, PLEASE DO | | NOT HESITATE IN CONTACTING THIS OFFICE AND THIS | | REVIEWER. | | | | DEWEY PALMER | | ELECTRICAL PLAN REVIEW II | | CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPT. | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | 561-805-6717 | | [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-12-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-12-04 |
Time |
09:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-12-04 |
Time |
09:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-12-04 09:12:43 | THIS IS ALL INTERIOR WORK.OUTSIDE WORK, SIDEWALK, | | DRIWAY, SILT FENCE ETC ARE IN PERMIT# 07050649. | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI805-6723 |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-11-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-11-06 |
Time |
14:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-11-06 |
Time |
14:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-11-06 14:55:21 | **FAILED ** | | | | 1. PLEASE ADD CITY STANDARDS NOTES ON DRAWINGS FOR | | PARKING, DRIVEWAY, SIDEWALK, SIDEWALK SLOPE ETC. YOU | | CAN GET CITY'S STANDARDS NOTES IN A C. D. FROM 45TH | | STREET, 494-1040 | | OUR RESPONSE:ACCORDING TO YOUR RESPONSE, SEE SHEET | | A0. SHEET A0 DOES NOT SHOW CITY STANDARD NOTES AS WE | | ASKED FOR. | | | | 2. YOU NEED TO SHOW SIDEWALK, PARKINGS, DRIVEWAYETC., | | ON YOUR DRAWINGS. | | PER YOUR RESPONSE SEE SHEET A0.SHEET A0DOES NOT | | SHOW , THIS ITEM 2 | | | | 4. NEED TO SHOW THE DETAILS OF SILT FENCE, CLOTHES | | USED,HEIGHT, POST FOR SILT FENCE ETC FOR POLLUTION | | PREVENTION. NOT JUST SILT FENCE AROUND SITE. | | OUR RESPONSE: SHEET A0DOESNOT SHOWDETAILS OF SILT | | FENCE, WE ASKED LAST TIME. | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI 805-6723 |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-09-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-09-11 |
Time |
11:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-09-11 |
Time |
11:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-09-11 11:15:35 | **FAILED ** | | | | 1. IT APPEARS THAT THE SIDEWALK IS IN CITY'S RIGHT OF | | WAY.YOU NEED AN APPROVAL FROM WINDEL PALMER, BEFORE | | WE LOOK AT IT,1000 45TH STREET,, 494-1040,ENG | | DEPT. | | 2. PLEASE ADD CITY STANDARDS NOTES ON DRAWINGS FOR | | PARKING, DRIVEWAY, SIDEWALK, SIDEWALK SLOPE ETC. YOU | | CAN GET CITY'S STANDARDS NOTES IN A C. D. FROM 45TH | | STREET, 494-1040 | | 3. YOU NEED TO SHOW SIDEWALK, PARKINGS, DRIVEWAYETC., | | ON YOUR DRAWINGS. | | 4. NEED TO SHOW THE DETAILS OF SILT FENCE, CLOTHES | | USED,HEIGHT, POST FOR SILT FENCE ETC FOR POLLUTION | | PREVENTION. NOT JUST SILT FENCE AROUND SITE. | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI 805-6723 |
|
|
Review Stop |
ENG |
ENGINEERING CSD |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-01 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-06-01 |
Time |
11:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rchokshi |
Date |
2007-06-01 |
Time |
10:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-06-01 11:10:01 | **FAILED ** | | | | 1. NEED PROPERTY SURVEY TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE SIDE | | WALK IS IN YOUR PROPERTY OR IT IS IN CITY'S RIRGT OF | | WAY. | | 2. IF THE SIDEWALK IS IN CITY'S RIGHT OF WAY, THEN YOU | | NEED AN APPROVAL FROM WINDEL PALMER, BEFORE WE LOOK AT | | IT,1000 45TH STREET,, 494-1040,ENG DEPT. | | 3. PLEASE ADD CITY STANDARDS NOTES ON DRAWINGS FOR | | PARKING, DRVEWAY, SIDEWALK, SIDEWALK SLOPE ETC. YOU CAN | | GET CITY'S STANDARDS NOTES IN A C. D. FROM 45TH STREET | | | | 4. NEED A POLLUTION PREVENTION DETAILS, SILT FENCE | | AROUND THE SITE. | | | | RASIK CHOKSHI 805-6723 | 2007-05-17 09:07:02 | REPLACING SIDE WALK ON SOUTH SIDE OF BUILDING, NEEDS | | ENG. |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-11-02 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2007-11-02 |
Time |
10:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mwennerg |
Date |
2007-11-02 |
Time |
10:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-11-02 10:56:42 | PLANS APPROVED ON 9/24/07. NEW LS SHEET STAMPED. |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-24 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-09-24 |
Time |
13:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mawillia |
Date |
2007-09-24 |
Time |
13:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-09-24 13:33:54 | *****APPROVED***** | | | | THE COMMENTS FROM THE PREVIOUS FIRE PLAN REVIEW HAVE | | BEEN SATISFIED;PLAN SHEETS A-2, LS-1, AND E-1 WERE | | STAMPED, INITIALED, AND DATED.PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT | | ONLY TWO OF THREE SUBMITTED PLAN SETS WERE | | FIRE-STAMPED, THE THIRD NOT STAMPED DUE TO ABSENCE OF | | SIGN AND SEAL. |
|
|
Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2007-06-14 |
Time |
12:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
mcarsill |
Date |
2007-06-14 |
Time |
11:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-06-14 12:07:19 | 1. DEMOLITION, RENOVATION, AND CONSTRUCTION TO COMPLY | | WITH NFPA 241. | | | | 2. PLEASE INDICATE INTERIOR FINISH CLASSIFICATIONS FOR | | WALLS AND CEILINGS. | | | | 3. PLANS DO NOT DECLARE ANY EXISTING OR NEW FIRE | | SPRINKLER OR FIRE ALARM EQUIPMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE | | INFORMATION. | | | | 4. ELEVATION DRAWINGS DO NOT DISPLAY BUILDING ADDRESS. | | THE BUILDING ADDRESS IS REQUIRED ON THE PROPER | | ELEVATION. THE NUMBERS NEED TO BE AT LEAST SIX INCHES | | HIGH AND AT LEAST ONE INCH WIDE. | | | | 5. PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE EXISTING EXIT SIGNS ARE | | FUNCTIONING PROPERLY. | | | | MIKE CARSILLO, BATTALION CHIEF OF FIRE PREVENTION | | 804-4709 PHONE | | 804-4774 FAX |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
6 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-06-25 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-25 |
Time |
11:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2008-06-25 |
Time |
11:09 |
Sent To |
E |
|
Notes |
2008-06-25 11:09:21 | TO "DPALMER" DESK/REV |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2008-01-10 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
spalmer |
Date |
2008-01-10 |
Time |
09:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
spalmer |
Date |
2008-01-10 |
Time |
09:08 |
Sent To |
Z |
|
Notes |
2008-01-10 09:08:25 | TO ZONING BOX |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-11-21 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-21 |
Time |
11:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-11-21 |
Time |
11:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-11-30 13:50:40 | TO "COMM" BD#49 | 2007-11-21 11:30:50 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-10-11 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-11 |
Time |
16:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-10-11 |
Time |
16:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-10-30 15:05:50 | TO "COMM" BD#19 | 2007-10-11 16:21:11 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-08-06 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-08-06 |
Time |
13:18 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adarroug |
Date |
2007-08-06 |
Time |
13:18 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-08-31 08:55:02 | TO "COMM" BD#8 | 2007-08-06 13:19:05 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
I |
INCOMING/PROCESSING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-07-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-07-30 |
Time |
09:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
2007-05-03 |
Time |
15:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-05-15 09:14:35 | TO "COMM" BD#23 | 2007-05-03 15:41:39 | WAITING FOR "COMM" BD |
|
|
Review Stop |
M |
MECHANICAL (A/C) |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
2007-05-31 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-05-31 |
Time |
09:39 |
Rev Time |
0.20 |
Received By |
tgordon |
Date |
2007-05-31 |
Time |
09:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-05-31 09:40:06 | NO MECHANICAL PLANS SUBMITTED, AND NO | | MECHANICAL PERMIT NUMBER APPLIED FOR AT | | THIS TIME. |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-22 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-09-22 |
Time |
07:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-09-22 |
Time |
07:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Review Stop |
P |
PLUMBING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-06-09 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-06-09 |
Time |
14:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
kstevens |
Date |
2007-06-09 |
Time |
14:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-06-09 15:48:42 | DENIED | | REFERENCE: FBC-2004 PLUMBING | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 1 | | FBC-2004 CHAPTER 11 | | FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE | | FLORIDA STATUTES | | | | 1. ALL ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS. THE STATUS OF THE FIRM | | LICENSE NUMBER, (CERTIFICATE OF AUTHROIZATION), IS | | LISTED AS DELINQUENT. PLEASE HAVE STATUS UPGRADED PRIOR | | TO RESUBMITTING. FAC 61G1-16.004(4) & FS 481.219, | | 481.2055. | | | | 2. SHT A.O INDICATES A NEW DRINKING FOUNTAIN. PLEASE | | SUBMIT A DETAIL SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 11-4.15 | | AND ALL SUBSECTIONS AS WELL AS SECTION 11-4.1.3(10)(A) | | PROVISIONS FOR THOSE WHO HAVE DIFFICULTY BENDING OR | | STOOPING. | | | | 3. SHT LS.1 DETAIL 2 KITCHENETTE SINK. SHOW COMPLIANCE | | FOR THE FOLLOWING: | | A. 11-4.24.3 KNEE CLEARANCE | | B. 11-4.24.4 SINK DEPTH | | C. 11-4.24.5 CLEAR FLOOR SPACE | | D. 11-4.24.7 FAUCETS | | | | 4. A TURNING AREA IS REQUIRED IN THE KITCHENETTE AREA | | PER SECTION 11-4.2.3. | | | | 5. SHT LS.1 DETAIL 2 CODE REFERENCE IS FBC-2001. THE | | CODE ADOPTED IS FBC-2004. PLEASE CORRECT CODE | | REFERENCE. | | | | 6. SUBMIT A SANITARY RISER ISOMETRIC DIAGRAM FOR THE | | DRAINAGE WASTE & VENT FOR THE NEW DRINKING FOUNTAIN PER | | SECTION 106.3.5.1.3(4)(6)(13). SHOW ALL PIPE SIZES, | | TRAPS, VENTS AND POINT OF CONNECTION. | | | | 7. SUBMIT A WATER RISER ISOMETRIC DIAGRAM FOR THE | | DRINKING FOUNTAIN. SHOW ALL PIPE SIZES, VALVES, AND | | INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE REQUIRED RPZV BACKFLOW. | | SECTION 106.3.5.1.3(3)(8)(10)(13). | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING PLANS PLEASE INDICATE | | THE REVISION & REMOVE & REPLACE ANY | | PAGES AS NECESSARY. A TRANSMITTAL LETTER | | LISTING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW COMMENT NUMBER, | | WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE REVISION | | MADE, IDENTIFYING THE SHEET OR SPECIFICATION | | PAGE WHERE THE CHANGES CAN BE FOUND | | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PERMIT. REMOVE ALL VOID | | SHEETS FROM ALL PLANS AND PLACE ONE SET OF THEM LOOSELY | | ON TOP OF THE COLLATED PLANS TO BE REVIEWED. THANK YOU | | FOR YOUR ANTICIPATED COOPERATION. | | | | REVIEW BY KEN STEVENS | | (561) 805-6721 | | FAX (561) 805-6713 | | E-MAIL [email protected] |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2008-01-14 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2008-01-14 |
Time |
17:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2008-01-11 |
Time |
17:28 |
Sent To |
B |
|
Notes |
2008-01-14 17:26:10 | PER ERIC SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER. | | | | INTERIOR RENOVATIONS ONLY. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-12-04 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-12-04 |
Time |
10:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-12-04 |
Time |
09:44 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-12-04 09:53:40 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | | ***FAILED*** | | | | 1.BASED ON THE REVISED WORK VALUE DATED OCTOBER 11, | | 2007, THE NEW INSIDE COST IS $54,354.43 AND THE OUTSIDE | | PERMIT COST IS $60,000.BOTH OF THESE VALUES ADD UP TO | | $114,354.43, WHICH EXCEEDS 50 PERCENT OF THE | | IMPROVEMENT VALUE ($113,234.00).PLEASE ADDRESS. | | | | A. PLEASE NOTE THAT PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-441(C) OF | | THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, | | RENOVATIONS, REPAIRS, ALTERATIONS OR REDEVELOPMENTS | | WHICH EXCEED 50 PERCENT OF THE VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE | | SHALL COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE XIV, | | LANDSCAPING, LAND CLEARING, AND TREE PROTECTION, OF THE | | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. | | I. A LANDSCAPE PLAN, PREPARED, SIGNED AND SEALED BY A | | REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, AND MEETING THE | | PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE XIV, LANDSCAPING, LAND CLEARING, | | AND TREE PROTECTION, OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | REGULATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | II. THE LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS MAY BE VIEWED ONLINE AT | | WWW.MUNICODE.COM. | | | | COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA Q. OR ERIC | | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
2007-09-20 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-09-20 |
Time |
13:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-09-20 |
Time |
09:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-09-20 13:28:35 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | | ***PASSED*** | | | | TREE ALTERATION PERMIT RECEIVED ON SEPTEMBER 4, 2007. | | ALL CONDITIONS OF THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | MET PRIOR TO C.O. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-08-29 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-08-29 |
Time |
13:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-08-29 |
Time |
09:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-09-07 11:26:37 | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: | | | | 1.TREE REMOVAL APPLICATION PERMIT RECEIVED ON | | 09/04/2007. | | | | 2.IT CAME TO STAFF'S ATTENTION THAT THE RENOVATION | | VALUE OF ALL PERMITS APPLIED FOR THIS SITE EXCEEDS 50% | | OF THE IMPROVEMENT VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE.CURRENT | | INFORMATION BY THE PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY | | APPRAISER'S OFFICE STATES THAT THE IMPROVEMENT VALUE OF | | THE STRUCTURE IS $226,468.THEREFORE, COMMENT NO. 5 | | FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW (1ST REVIEW DATED MAY 30, | | 2007) STILL NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED (SEE BELOW). | | | | 3. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-441(C) OF THE ZONING AND LAND | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, RENOVATIONS, REPAIRS, | | ALTERATIONS OR REDEVELOPMENTS WHICH EXCEED 50 PERCENT | | OF THE VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE | | PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE XIV, LANDSCAPING, LAND CLEARING, | | AND TREE PROTECTION, OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | REGULATIONS. | | A. A LANDSCAPE PLAN, PREPARED, SIGNED AND SEALED BY A | | REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, AND MEETING THE | | PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE XIV, LANDSCAPING, LAND CLEARING, | | AND TREE PROTECTION, OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | REGULATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | B. THE LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS MAY BE VIEWED ONLINE AT | | WWW.MUNICODE.COM. | | C. PLEASE PROVIDE THE APPRAISED VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE. | | THE TOTAL VALUE OF THE PERMITS FOR THE RENOVATION OF | | THE BUILDING WILL BE CALCULATED TO DETERMINE THE 50 | | PERCENT THRESHOLD. | | | | COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA Q. OR ERIC | | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435. | 2007-08-29 13:16:25 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | | ***FAILED*** | | | | 1.(REPEAT COMMENT) A TREE REMOVAL LICENSE APPLICATION | | SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING | | DEPARTMENT FOR ALL TREES (7 PALMS) THAT WILL BE REMOVED | | AND/OR RELOCATED. | | | | 2.THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO | | THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO BUILDING | | PERMIT APPROVAL.PLEASE SUBMIT THE FOLLOWING WITH THE | | TREE ALTERATION PERMIT: | | A. A TREE SURVEY. | | B. LIST OF TREES TO BE RELOCATED ON OR OFF SITE. | | C. LOCATION OF TREES TO BE RELOCATED. | | | | COMMENTS/QUESTIONS CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA Q. OR ERIC | | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435. |
|
|
Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
2007-05-30 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
Sent By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-05-30 |
Time |
16:12 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
Received By |
adavila |
Date |
2007-05-21 |
Time |
20:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
Notes |
2007-05-30 16:12:43 | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | | ***FAILED*** | | | | 1. PROVIDE TWO (2) SIGNED AND SEALED SURVEYS.SURVEY | | SHALL BE LESS THAN A YEAR OLD. | | | | 2. PROVIDE A LETTER FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES | | DEPARTMENT APPROVING THE PROPOSED ON-STREET PARKING | | SPACES.THE LETTER SHALL ALSO STATE THE TOTAL NUMBER | | OF AVAILABLE PARKING SPACES ALONG KANUGA DRIVE. | | A. PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL ON-STREET PARKING SPACES SHALL | | BE DELINEATED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT APPROVAL. | | B. PROVIDE WIDTH AND DEPTH DIMENSIONS OF ALL APPROVED | | ON-STREET PARKING SPACES ON THE SITE PLAN. | | C. PROVIDE PARKING STALL DETAILS OF ALL APPROVED | | ON-STREET PARKING SPACES. | | D. PLEASE NOTE THAT FOUR (4) PARKING SPACES, ONE OF | | WHICH SHALL BE A HANDICAP PARKING SPACE, SHALL BE | | MAINTAINED FOR THIS SITE. | | | | 3. HANDICAP SYMBOL SHALL BE TWO (2) FEET FROM THE OPEN | | END OF THE PARKING SPACE. | | | | 4. PROVIDE DIMENSIONS OF THE AISLE WIDTH.PLEASE NOTE | | THAT PER SECTION 94-485(J) OF THE ZONING AND LAND | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, TWO-WAY DIRECTION MOVEMENT | | REQUIRES A MINIMUM OF 24 FEET WIDE REGARDLESS OF | | PARKING ANGLE AND DIMENSIONS. | | | | 5. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-441(C) OF THE ZONING AND LAND | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, RENOVATIONS, REPAIRS, | | ALTERATIONS OR REDEVELOPMENTS WHICH EXCEED 50 PERCENT | | OF THE VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE | | PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE XIV, LANDSCAPING, LAND CLEARING, | | AND TREE PROTECTION, OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | REGULATIONS. | | A. A LANDSCAPE PLAN, PREPARED, SIGNED AND SEALED BY A | | REGISTERED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, AND MEETING THE | | PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE XIV, LANDSCAPING, LAND CLEARING, | | AND TREE PROTECTION, OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | REGULATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | B. THE LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS MAY BE VIEWED ONLINE AT | | WWW.MUNICODE.COM. | | C. PLEASE PROVIDE THE APPRAISED VALUE OF THE STRUCTURE. | | THE TOTAL VALUE OF THE PERMITS FOR THE RENOVATION OF | | THE BUILDING WILL BE CALCULATED TO DETERMINE THE 50 | | PERCENT THRESHOLD . | | | | 6. PROVIDE LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS OF WHAT IS EXISTING | | VS. WHAT IS PROPOSED. | | | | 7. A TREE REMOVAL LICENSE APPLICATION SHALL BE | | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT FOR ALL | | TREES (7 PALMS) THAT WILL BE REMOVED AND/OR RELOCATED. | | | | | | 8. PROVIDE REAR SETBACK DIMENSION. | | | | 9. THE PROPOSED FENCE/WALL IS LOCATED WITHIN THE | | VISIBILITY TRIANGLE.PLEASE NOTE THAT PER SECTION | | 94-305(E) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | REGULATIONS, AT ANY ROAD INTERSECTIONS, VISIBILITY | | SHALL NOT BE OBSCURED BY ANY ITEM BETWEEN 18 INCHES OR | | 8 FEET IN HEIGHT WITHIN A TRIANGLE BEGINNING AT THE | | POINT WHERE PROPERTY LINES MEET AT THE CORNER, THEN 20 | | FEET ALONG THE FRONT PROPERTY LINE, THENCE DIAGONALLY | | TO A POINT ALONG THE SIDE PROPERTY LINE 20 FEET FROM | | THE POINT OF BEGINNING, AND THEN TO THE POINT OF | | BEGINNING.SHEET S.2 INCORRECTLY SHOWS THE VISIBILITY | | TRIANGLE BEING AT THE POINT WHERE THE CURBS MEET. | | | | 10. THE PROPOSED GATE ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE | | SHALL BE NO LESS THAN 24 FEET WIDE. | | | | 11. PLEASE NOTE THAT A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT SHALL BE | | SUBMITTED FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE EXISTING | | SIDEWALK. | | | | 12. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE LOCATION MAP HIGHLIGHTS TWO | | (2) DIFFERENT PROPERTIES/LOCATIONS. | | | | COMMENTS/QUESTIONS, CONTACT ANDREINA DAVILA Q. OR ERIC | | SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT 822-1435. | 2007-05-17 09:03:35 | NEEDS |
|
|